# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032443.txt_6940
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032443.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The\nScience of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos.\nContemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt.\n\nI’ll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of\nfun stuff to cheer our 2017.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/22/2017 7:33:34 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US\nrelations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt\n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt_6941
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt
subject: The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "Global Asset Allocation \n\n________________________________\n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\n*   Asset allocation –– Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market correlations to remain much lower than in recent years. \n\n*   Economics –– US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are responding to higher taxes.    \n\n*   Fixed Income –– Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\n\n*   Equities –– Japan remains our main country overweight.  \n\n*   Credit –– We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the core.\n\n*   Currencies –– Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the dollar.\n\n*   Commodities –– Stay long Brent and short gasoline. \n\n*   US stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds are generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains the troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt. \n\n*   Our overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead a number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk premia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been largely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”. \n\n*   In addition, we are seeing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into a bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD activity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst offsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile for the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\n*   Without a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a local impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this environment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various markets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our view of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term investors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\n*   Local issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese policy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The strong control of the government and its high approval rating are steadily raising the chance of success. We stay overweight Japanese equities and grow wary of the short yen trade, as capital inflows and rising growth expectations (chart of right) are ultimately bullish for the currency. Watch next week’s BoJ meeting, led by newly appointed Governor Kuroda, for new reflationary measures.  \n\n*   The Euro area economy remains in recession, while policy makers are making little effort to reverse the contraction. We monitor signs of any large deposit flight post Cyprus over coming weeks and months to judge whether the bailout may actually be worsening conditions in the Euro. Economic forecast momentum remains negative (chart of right). These are good reasons to underweight the Euro area, if not all of Europe, across asset classes, against the rest of the world. \n\n*   The US, in contrast, is seeing better spending from both corporates and consumers than we could have expected post Fiscal Cliff and sequestration. But given the huge amount of fiscal drag, which is a fact, we want to see another 1-2 months of data before extrapolating the good news. It did support US equities in recent weeks, which continue to benefit from US corporates issuing debt to buy their own shares and others', through M&A. This corporate rotation from debt to equities is almost exclusively a US flow, which helps explain US equity outperformance. \n\n*   Across risk assets, we are similarly seeing huge delinking, with equities rallying greatly and commodities and credit seeing no gains (chart p. 1), very much unlike last year. Commodities are delinking as there are no growth upgrades in EM, and inflation concerns are concentrated on two countries, UK and Japan. Credit is delinking as most investors are massively overweight credit versus equities, as evidenced by the disparity in buying flows in 2011-12. Relevering by US corporate and the Fed debating the end of QE are signaling that the 3-decade long rally in bonds is likely over. Investors are starting to dollar-average away from bonds to equities. \n\nFixed Income\n\n*   Bonds rallied again, except for Euro area peripherals, the source of this week’s market concerns. The imposition of capital controls on Cypriot deposits is to be sure a watershed moment, but for now not one we expect to spark significant deposit withdrawals elsewhere. Meanwhile, the most likely outcome to the Italian impasse appears to be new elections in the autumn. With seemingly little prospect of a material rise in yields on the safest assets, we think the search for carry evident across the full gamut of asset markets will see peripheral spreads narrow over time. \n\n*   Ten-year JGB yields have rallied to within a few bps of their all-time low, ahead of next week’s inaugural meeting for the new BoJ leadership. We do indeed expect aggressive easing, with JGB purchases out to 30 years, but think this will be trumped by profit taking in JGBs after the fiscal year end. \n\n*   Our latest Inflation Expectations Survey (F. Diamond, K. Gupta) was out yesterday. One interesting result is that almost 90% of respondents believe the BoJ has less than a 50/50 shot of hitting its 2% inflation target in two years, a reflection of the formidable challenge of sparking inflation expectations after two decades of falling prices. \n\nEquities\n\n*   The global rally in equity markets slowed this week, but did not reverse, on continued concerns about the fallout from a poorly executed Cyprus solution. The Euro area underperformed again, for a second week in a row.  As discussed last week, we view Cyprus as a local problem that we address by underweighting Euro area equities in a global portfolio. A potential negative feedback loop from markets to the economy poses a serious downside risk for Euro area growth over coming months prolonging the current run of negative economic surprises from the region.\n\n*   Japan is the region we like the most. In our mind the Japanese equity trade has further legs not only due to prospective BoJ balance sheet expansion but more importantly due to a reform agenda to be unveiled into the summer.  \n\n*   EM equities are suffering from renewed policy tightening in major EM economies such as Brazil and China. Investors have bitter memories of previous property tightening measures in China. As within DM, we see a lot of divergences within EM and prefer to focus on under-owned markets with good domestic demand story such as Mexico and Malaysia.  See “Consensus Asset Allocation”, Adrian Mowat and team, Mar 26th. Open overweights in Mexican and Malaysia equities vs MSCI EM.\n\n*   For long-term investors we just released our quarterly publication \"Trade opportunities for long term investors\" Mar 27. We monetize risk premia in Value stocks via a long in S&P500 Value vs S&P500 ETFs. It appears that a five year long underperformance of Value stocks has come to an end. We take profit on trades that monetize skew risk premia in S&P500 due to sharp contraction over the past quarter. We continue to monetize equity risk premia via buying high dividend yield equity ETFs against USTs. Our preference is to buy ETFs which track the S&P US Preferred stock due to its high yield, around 6%, and its high weight on Financials. \n\nCredit\n\n*   The news flow from the Cypriot bailout continued to push spreads wider and vol higher this week, with European Financials underperforming as creditor bail-in risks returned to the forefront. iTraxx senior and subordinated financials indices widened 20bp as investors sought to hedge via CDS rather than sell bonds. European credit continued to underperformed US credit.\n\n*   The fact that Cypriot banks debt is only 1.3% of total liabilities was a key factor in the decision to bail-in depositors. Yet events surrounding the banking sector restructuring also suggest that keeping senior unsecured bondholders immune from costly bail-outs is politically untenable. This removes the implicit ‘cover’ that senior bonds holders have enjoyed and has increased speculation that implementation of the bail-in proposals under the EU’s Resolution & Recovery Directive (RRD) will be brought forward to 2015 from the current 2018 time-frame.\n\n*   As such, our colleagues in European Credit have examined the implications of changing recovery rate expectations across the bank capital structure. Assuming that covered bonds remain outside the scope of the proposals, we expect senior bank bond spreads to widen relative to covered bonds and prefer being OW covered bonds vs senior bonds in the periphery, particularly in Spain where covered bonds have first claim over the entire mortgage book of the bank. From a relative value point of view, we also suggest owning subordinated bank bonds vs senior bank bonds in the core as, under the new RRD regime, there is a higher probability than before that senior bank bond holders will lose money and this risk is, in our mind, not yet in the price (Rethinking the capital structure, R. Henriques et al., Mar 27).\n\nForeign Exchange\n\n*   Today’s research note, Sacrificing Cyprus, examines several presumptions which have arisen over the past two weeks due to the Cyprus crisis, and scores them on a scale of truths, half-truths and falsehoods. There are indeed some right conclusions to draw from this experience, but also some wrong ones. As examples, it is true that capital controls have created a two-tier euro, but very unlikely that Cyprus is exiting EMU. And while it is true that markets deserve a risk premium for policy uncertainty, the size of the premium should be much lower than in previous crises due to backstops like the OMT.\n\n*   For example, during the first Greek crisis in May 2010 EUR undershot by 10% relative to cyclical conditions at that time, and during Greek elections in May 2012 the currency undershot by 5%. The combination of Italian and Cypriot events have eliminated the euro’s overvaluation from early 2013, when the currency spiked to the high $1.30s on a presumption that LTRO funds would be repaid rapidly, driving European rates higher. The currency is now close to fair value, so carries no risk premium for contagion. The message is similar in vol markets: the 1% premium for 3-mo implied versus realized vol is far less than the 5% premium witnessed during previous crises. \n\n*   While there is no evidence that the EUR/USD cash or options market carries a risk premium, it is also true that the required premium should probably be far less than in previous crises given that a sovereign funding backstop like the OMT is in place. We are thus reluctant to extrapolate this mini-crisis into a systemic event which triggers broad deleveraging, or to forecast trend euro weakness. The currency could trade down a couple of cents around an ECB rate cut, but assuming that fears around Cyprus contagion pass in a month or two, the currency should reverse its recent decline by the summertime. \n\nCommodities \n\n*   Commodities rallied this week, up almost 2%, led by energy. We went tactically long Brent in last week’s J.P. Morgan View as we believed that the correction in oil markets had brought prices too far below our price forecast of $112/bbl. Since then Brent is up around 1.5%. We stay long and expect further price appreciation over coming months. We are also short gasoline vs. Brent. Gasoline cracks (the premium for gasoline over crude prices) spiked over the first three months of the year due to a combination of low inventories and refinery closures that came during refinery maintenance season. As refinery maintenance comes to a close and demand falls seasonally, gasoline prices should fall relative to Brent. \n\n*   We went long Soybean time spreads late last year (GMOS, Dec 5) on a view that much higher Brazilian supplies would find it difficult to leave the country due to logistical constraints. Since then we have seen a record number of ships planning to load soybeans in Brazilian ports and this number is still rising. The average waiting time before loading is also rising, now 38 days compared to 26 days a month ago. This has caused the front Soybean contract to rally while longer maturity contracts have been depressed by the much higher than normal supply inside the country. The spread between the May-13 and Jul-13 contracts has doubled since we put the trade on in December. We stay long as we think these logistical issues are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029402.txt_6951
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029402.txt
subject: Fw: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)
messages:
  [{"sender": "HMS-in the News <HMS In The News@HMS.HARVARD.EDU>", "recipients": ["<HMSNEWS QUAD FAC STAFF@LISTSERV.MED.HARVARD.EDU>"], "timestamp": "March 22, 2017 at 2:34:12 PM EDT", "subject": "HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Tanzi, Rudolph iii", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 22, 2017 2:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": "WOW!!!"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 7:29:01 PM", "subject": "Fw: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": "See item # 2"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt_6957
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it\n-- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die.\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\n\nlauren petrella [a"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 8 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK\nbecause after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for me\neither way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:59:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Pass on midelfart wealthiest girl in Norway"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt_6964
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruenmler"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number i= and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032319.txt_6966
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032319.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 14, 2016, at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your heat map showign for trump clinton"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 15, 2016, at 5:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nWe are in the process of removing data from bots and making a clean report which I will share with you in few hours. Overall Trump is way more popular than Clinton.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/29/2016 1:40:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nLooks like Trump is back in game. We processed 11 million tweets this week for Trump and 50.03% are positive and only 20.66% are negative whereas Clinton is 56.05% negative and 20.03% positive.\n\nWe are trying to correlate that into popular vote outcome and electoral votes received.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029497.txt_6968
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029497.txt
subject: Re: Kim Jong Un's visit to China
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/1/2018 4:03:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Kim Jong Un's visit to China", "body": "I am curious to see what will be a reaction from Trump's administration and from Europe if Chinese\nForeign Minister Wang Yi do visit Kremlin and possibly Kim's visit right after... Reunion of\nthree socialist countries?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: Kim Jong Un's visit to China", "body": "Have you seen the full video? so interesting...\nSee the beginning. Looks like a theater, they emote too much. It's funny!\nAnd also on 5:45 min when he meets XI Jinping before their diplomatic discussion meeting\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQp1Qp0Gw7Y&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter axioschina&stream=top-stories"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028789.txt_6970
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028789.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey, \nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this. \nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with \nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,. \nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you: \nMr. Tarek El Sayed, \nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you. \nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for \nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like \nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase. \nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department \nwere as follows: \n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.) \nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr \nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations. \nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also \nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for \nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport \ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring \ncountries. \nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of \nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and \nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable. \nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many \nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be \nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you \nmay have seen already. \nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft \nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility. \nSincerely, \nLawrance Visoski \nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:23:25 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt_6977
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt
subject: Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:27:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip", "body": "did you get your money?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!! \nhttps://bossip.com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-her-pornographic-pleasure-pocket-43081/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt_6980
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt
subject: Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/15/2018 1:09:39 AM", "subject": "Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'", "body": "https://pagesix.com/2018/09/14/steve-bannon-was-supposed-to-appear-in-michael-moores-fahrenheit-11-9/? ga=2.179263469.891655311.1536972901-2116259238.1278814960  \n\nSteve Bannon almost appeared in Michael \nMoore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9' \nSteve Bannon was invited to be in Michael Moore's latest documentary, \"Fahrenheit 11/9,\" \nand while the former White House strategist declined to go on camera, he did meet with \nMoore for two hours, the filmmaker revealed after the film's NYC premiere. \nAfter a Lincoln Center screening, Moore, at a Tavern on the Green party, revealed Bannon \nwas almost in the film. \"We wanted Steve Bannon to answer that first question in the film: \n'How the f—k did this happen?' \" the liberal gadfly told guests. \n\"It took a long time. We finally got him to come over, no cameras ... He said he wanted to \ntalk to me first. And we talked to him for two hours.\" \nUltimately, Bannon decided not to go on camera, but the conversation had a seismic impact \non the finished film anyway. \n\"He said something very profound to us, and it changed us and it changed the course of the \nfilm,\" Moore said of Bannon. \"I asked him, 'How did you pull this [Trump's election] \noff?' And he said, 'It's a very easy answer. Our side, we go for the head wound. Your side, \nyou have pillow fights.'\" \nMoore continued, \"That so f—ked us up to hear him say that ... watching him smirk as he \nsaid it. As soon as he left, we decided to watch the film... and put the pillow fight filter.\" \nOne example Moore gave of a change to his film post-Bannon was a line about news \nnetworks being run by men, from \"most\" to \"all.\" \n\"It's amazing how we talk as liberals. We always want to be nice and maybe be fair,\" Moore \nexplained. \nThe film also jabs at the media, highlighting major newsmen who have turned out to be \npredators, including Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose. \nA spy told us, \"Everyone in the theater hissed when Les Moonves' face came up on-screen.\" \nMoore also held a Q&A after the screening. \nThe movie's already premiered in Moore's hometown of Flint, Mich., and played the \nToronto International Film Festival."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023349.txt_6983
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023349.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:29 PM", "subject": null, "body": "agenda for tomorrow.\n1 building an office from scratch. who doesit. ? so far little or no progress in real terms.. brad should remain and can administrate. follow up methodically, . has no idea of corrrect questions to ask. or understanding of family office issues. procedures checlks and balances. etc .. consultants , diana goldner foundtaion woman?. office . focus .\n2. without strong , very stroung direction, joslin will not make it. does not know where to focus. who to respond to. and how. unfortunately now getting more and more answers like the powers that be , want it that way.??"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:53 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I spoke to brad and made him aware of all my concerns and propsals to move forward. he is desperate for help"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "saved you 500k at the last minute, . brad has had the same chart since march 16th, its his job to review NOT MINE .appears he is one of those living in the dark leiwe. I found 8 million dollars today, missed deductions. . not yet in the numbers, .?\n\nemblematic of my frustration and ,in the end what I believe is a waste of our time energy money and resources. is the very simple question of bidco bank accounts. 4 months ago I asked the question , does it have a bank account and if so , who has authority, where is it located and what transacations ran through it. it is only one question out of hundreds that need to be answered. hundreds. . you asked that i not behave like Zeus and try to explain why I want need certain things. since isaid to placate Brad's inquisitive ness and his desire to learn I said a filing might be required. instead of merely getting me the answer. he has talked to joslin paul weiss , you , you wanted to ask brad karp. ( maybe a filing that reopened things, )\n\nnone of this as a practical matter has any influence upon the ultimate action taken . I merely needed to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025520.txt_6992
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025520.txt
subject: Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Oliver Lane", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'\n\nAs Steve Bannon continues his tour of Europe, energizing the anti-establishment populist base, the mainstream media cannot help but admit their admiration for his abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. In this week's issue, the left-wing German weekly Stern articulates the greatest fear of the European establishment: that Bannon \"could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.\" Many thought that the reign of the \"Dark Lord\" had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon's adversaries had underestimated him, because he is \"as dangerous as ever,\" he confesses. Kramper cannot conceal his respect for Bannon's ability to move a crowd. He was greeted by \"frenetic applause\" in his recent address before France's National Front party, Kramper writes, demonstrating his \"impressive potential,\" which the writer describes as \"dangerous.\" In the mind of his audience, Bannon is something of a miracle-worker, Stamper notes, having \"done the impossible\" by bringing Donald Trump into the White House. The reason Bannon is dangerous, Kramper continues, is because he \"lays out the political program of a worldwide right: He has already conquered the USA; now Europe and then the whole world will follow.\"\n\n\"You are part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary, bigger than all that,\" Bannon told French populists. Bannon showed that he \"dominates the mood against the 'elites,' the 'establishment' and the 'perverse system' of greedy corporations and banks, and of course also against the press, which is led around 'like a dog on the Leash,\" Stamper writes. And now he Mr. Bannon setting himself up as an instigator, if not an outright shepherd, of a movement that crosses borders, languages and parties. \"Bannon is a master of apocalyptic rhetoric,\" Stamper continues, effortlessly weaving together nationalist interests with an international populist movement. The American strategist showed his \"true caliber\" by expounding modern methods of political freedom through blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, Stamper said, leaving many of his hearers behind. Bannon has demonstrated that if the right wants to rule the future, \"it must dominate modern themes and rhetorically position them,\" he added. Aspiring to be far more than an uncle who tells stories to his nephews of how he won the fight for the White House, Stamper writes, \"Bannon wants to become the super godfather of the international right.\" Although Bannon often looks a bit disheveled, \"he should not be underestimated,\" the writer warns. Past business partners attribute impressive \"strategic foresight\" to the eccentric tactician, saying he was often \"three or four steps ahead\" of his opponents in business. Because of his phenomenal memory, his nickname is \"the encyclopedia,\" Stamper notes with a certain reverence, and in his speeches he will spontaneously cite \"forgotten thinkers, known only to a handful of specialists.\" \"Bannon brings with him exclusive knowledge of power from the very heart of power,\" Stamper writes, which he will bring to bear on Europe's fragmented populist populism. According to Stamper, Bannon has established his \"European headquarters\" in Italy, from where he intends to galvanize European populists. The Italian political situation is completely to his liking, Stamper declares, with a political landscape \"dominated by populists, right-wing ideologues and the political puppeteer Berlusconi.\""}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <IMII>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 7:47:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Pretty powerful"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt_6994
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt
subject: Re: hicks
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sidney Blumenthal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2018 2:08", "subject": "hicks", "body": "https://blindgossip.com/?p=89824"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 15, 2018 2:55 PM", "subject": "hicks", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2018 10:41:00 PM", "subject": "Re: hicks", "body": "So the florida shooter always wore a trump hat and was looking to kill Jews and women"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028762.txt_6999
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028762.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Frost [kevin.frost@amfar.org]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night.\n\nSee you soon,\nKevin"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\n\nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance.\n\nAll the best,\nLena"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I got it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name of your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:59:08 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Forgot to ask you — please have someone from your office confirm 2 tickets for LifeBall for you.\nAlso provide them with a name of the girl that you are taking.\n\nOn the pdf that I sent you there is a contact info and refer to the email below (Magdalena Schuster)\nAnd she is holding them for you.\n\nPlease do it asap as these are hard to get."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt_7002
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["tamem"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "will be in new york from tuesday sep 12 for a week.. let me know the date and time to meet you if you there"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt_7003
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt
subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 2:14:35 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "OK.. Here it is.. suggestions?\n1. Item 1: I did neck with that woman, but never forced myself on her, and we talked about kissing or going \nbeyond that and decided not to.\n2. Item 2: This was what I told you about.. A student who came to me for advice about science \ncommunication.. I never approached her, or did anything, and have emails rebuffing her requests to meet off \ncampus for coffee or meals.. not because they were suggestive, but because I didn't think it was appropriate. I \ndid ask her about being a female in a male dominated physics major group because I wanted to find out what \nproblems might be occurring. I was respectful of her, and in fact my wife and I gave her a lift later at a AAAS \nmeeting that I had helped get her a fellowship to attend. I was shocked later to learn that she had \ncomplained. There was no official investigation., no formal complaint lodged.. When I spoke to the Dean and \ntold her the above, including showing emails, it was agreed that there would be no formal complaint but \nbecause the student had been upset I would not interact with her at all. I was shocked and dismayed, as I had \nworked very hard to be supportive and mentor this girl\n3. Item 3: I have no idea about this.\n4. This never happened.. In March 2008 at the convention I was approached by a student who did ask to sit at a \ntable with the then executive director of the Dawkins foundation. She asked me to join her in the hot tub. I said \nnow. Afterwards the exec. director informed me that this person was complaining that I had harassed her, and \nshe told me as she was there at the time she would be more than happy to explain that it was quite the opposite.\n5. This was a cruise with Nancy, who was my female companion. When that report appeared I explained that \nmy wife Nancy was upset at the allegation as she was my companion and such a complaint could be considered \nlibelous, the complaint was removed from the bloggers web site. Moreover, CFI not only continued to invite \nme on cruises but to speak at their events, including this year, where they have strict harassment policies. I \ncontinue to receive letters of thanks from them for my contributions, attitude, graciousness etc.. No complaints \never. Not one!\n6. This one you know about.\nShall we talk?\nLMK"}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss:\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations \nagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in \ndetail.\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 \nbelow). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and \nfabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious \nintent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve \nUniversity, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I \nam reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia \nHughes.\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). \nOur reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, \nArizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center \nfor Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints \nand concerns about your behavior during this time.\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and \neyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, \nstudents, and peers in the skeptics movement.\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you \nwish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are \nplanning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\nIncident 1:\n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a \nvolunteer for CFI D.C.\n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked \nher if she was \"of age.\"\n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying.\n• You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work.\n• In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne, \ndespite her suggestion that you go down to dinner.\n• You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face.\n• You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her and \ntrying to pull down the crotch of her tights.\n• She struggled to push you off her.\n• You said, \"When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you.\"\n• When you pulled out a condom, she got out from under you. She said \"I have to go,\" and rushed out of \nthe room.\nIncident 2:\n• In an incident that occurred in fall of 2007 while you were a physics professor at Case Western Reserve \nUniversity, a student tried to talk to you about her plans after graduation. You mentioned to her how tough it \nmust be to have all the other physics majors asking her out on dates.\n• In a second incident in December of 2007, while you were still at Case Western, the same student \nvisited your office to interview you for a student science journal. You closed the door behind her, and ignored \nthe questions she had prepared. Then you made a casual comment about taking her out for dinner.\n• Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, without \nmentioning you by name. \"There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thought \ndifferently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left me \nupset for weeks afterward,\" she wrote.\n• She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you, \nbased on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and \nshe did.\n• University investigators interviewed both you and the student.\n• On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university's associate vice president for student \naffairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told: \n\"This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university's sexual harassment \npolicy.\n• The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she \nremained at Case.\n• The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics \ndepartment before setting foot on the campus again.\n• The letter also stated, \"Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also \nhis willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with \nstudents.\"\n• By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the \nmonth before.\n• \"The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,\" \nyou told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008.\nIncident 3:\n• A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous \nincident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her.\nIncident 4:\n• You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists \nConvention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she \nwas attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic.\n• During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student \nand volunteers for Dawkins' foundation.\n• Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink.\n• You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a \nmale friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go.\n• You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, Iowa, in April 2011.\n• \ntable.\nYou pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the \n• She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She \ncrossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away.\nIncident 5:\n• This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were \n\ninformed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your \nfemale companion for sex in your cabin.\n• At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urged \nCFI's president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise, \nhowever.\nIncident 6:\n• During a visit to Melbourne, Australia, in November 2016, you were accused of sexual misconduct once \nagain.\n• The incident happened at a dinner held at the Melbourne Zoo as part of the Australian Skeptics  \nNational Convention, where you were a featured speaker.\n• With conference delegates chatting over drinks, a woman asked you for a celebrity selfie.\n• As the woman held out her phone to take the picture, you reached over her shoulder and grabbed her \nright breast.\n• She immediately reacted, bodychecking you and spinning around. \"Don't do that,\" she said.\n• BuzzFeed News has seen the complaint made by another woman to ASU, ANU, and the New College \nof the Humanities in London, including the selfie, her face obscured to conceal her identity. It shows your hand \nin motion as a blur in front of her shoulder, apparently moving toward her chest. Two other eyewitnesses have \nconfirmed the complainant's account of what happened.\n• In April 2017, the complainant described the incident on her blog. After hearing more about your \nreputation for inappropriate behavior from blog readers, she decided to file a complaint about the Nov. 2016 \nincident.\n• On July 16, she filed formal complaints with Arizona State University, and with the Australian National \nUniversity in Canberra and the New College of the Humanities in London, where you have visiting \nappointments.\n• Both Arizona State and the Australian National University told her they would look into the matter. But \nneither university found against you.\n• \"Based on the material available to the University, we do not have sufficient evidence to substantiate \nthe allegations,\" Kiaran Kirk, dean of the College of Science at the Australian National University, wrote to her.\n• Erin Ellison, who heads Arizona State's Office of Equity & Inclusion, wrote to her explaining that an \ninquiry \"did not find a violation of university policy.\"\n• In October, Arizona State denied a request from BuzzFeed News for documents relating to complaints \nof sexual harassment against you. However, Cynthia Jewett, the university's senior associate general counsel, \nnoted that two individuals, neither affiliated with the university, had complained about you. \"The University did \nnot find either communication to state a credible allegation,\" Jewett wrote.\nMiscellaneous facts:\n• In 2008, you founded the Origins Project at Arizona State University in Tempe, a multidisciplinary effort \nto understand the origins of the universe, life, and social systems. You have led that effort ever since.\n• Thanks to best-selling books like The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe From Nothing, frequent \nessays in publications including the New Yorker and the New York Times, and the documentary you made with \nbiologist Richard Dawkins, called The Unbelievers, you are celebrated as one of America's leading public \nintellectuals.\n• You served on the science policy committee for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and are a \nvocal critic of President Donald Trump.\n• You also make regular public appearances across the world, often at gatherings of skeptics and \natheists.\n• At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheon \nwith you and Dawkins.\n• Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told — \nSo Far.\n• Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned \"Lawrence Krauss for President.\"\n• In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that \nreligion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe.\n• You have stated that science provides answers to many of life's biggest questions, and can even fix \ngreat societal injustices.\n• Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the \ndeath of women and minorities in science. \"Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,\" you \nsaid. \"It's built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical \nevidence.\"\n• You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in \n2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail.\n• Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has \nprovided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently \npledging $100,000 in 2014.\n• In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: \"As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and \nhe always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my \npresumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\"\n• In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: \"I remain skeptical, and I support a man \nwhose character I believe I know.. .If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\"\n• You were made an honorary member of CFI's board of directors in December 2011.\n• A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post, \npublished at around the same time, described incident #5.\n• The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault \nwere \"potentially illegal.\" The second post was quickly taken down.\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible.\nIf I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to \nreach you.\nThanks,\nPeter Aldhous"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.txt_7011
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.txt
subject: From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit relating to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dies
messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/26/2019 10:56:00 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit relating to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dies", "body": "A U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit\ninvolving a wealthy, Clinton-connected financier and sex offender died\nSunday at the age of 96.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/federal-judge-overseeing-key-lawsuit-relating-\nto-pedophile-jeffrey-epstein-dies\n\nExplore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http:/(www.foxnews.com/apps-\nproducts/index.html."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt_7019
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt
subject: Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion | World news | The Guardian
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribs i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:51:52 PM", "subject": "Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion | World news | The Guardian", "body": "Bad news for TJB\n\nhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A | www.theguardian.com_ world 2017 may 29 close-\n2Dfriend-2Dtrump-2Dthomas-2Dbarrack-2Dalleged-2Dtax-2Devasion-2Ditaly-2 Dsardinia-3 FCMP-3Dshare-\n5Fbtn-SFfb&d=DQIFA g&c=euGZstcaT DIlvimEN8b7j XrwqOf-\nv5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=qvsWPMySvJQKJyiCbbH3_ UeJCrKMWih9KXDAWYE2eSw&m=HWysklH7mKJ1s\ny-3HdPAkCHdCOMhzGIxMC3_stl3GEg&s=FOWqhPv3Cj87MVTDCVx3sZahVmybNtdsoq3D_ V-SyAU&e="}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026260.txt_7025
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026260.txt
subject:
  Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bano"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a confession privelege. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Populist/Nationalist first\nConservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next\nReverse alabama\n\nThis coalition staves off \"times up\" for next decade plus"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:24:39 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "understood. but need details. money needed for think tank, for ads. for policy meetings. . though leaders. we could also make the coin in some instances non negotiable for 2 years. . is there a super smart FEC person. ?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <i>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:26:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Yes...I've got the 2nd best--best is don mcegahn who is occupied currently"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt_7029
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt
subject:
  RE: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN

messages:
  [{"sender": "Bennet Moskowitz", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 6:02:16 PM", "subject": "RE: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Darren,\n\nRegards,\nBennet"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke [darren@indykepllc.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "Moskowitz, Bennet J."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD\nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP\nWHITE HOUSE POLICY.\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON\nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR\nESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!\nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE.\nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM\nBER!!!!!\nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST\nJEFF EPSTEIN !!!!\nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE\nGIRLS !!!!!!\nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE\nRECORDED BY JEFF EPSTEIN !!!!!\nJEFF EPSTEIN IS NOT IN FEDERAL PRISON ONLY BECAUSE JEFF EPSTEIN IS HOLDING TH\nE ABOVE PICTURES !!!!!!\nTHANK YOU SIR\nGO PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt_7031
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "catch up today?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Buying a new kayak...hard negotiations going on...will call when I am done...Rudy next ag..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-yiew-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25 story.html?utm term=.37edla334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know if your boy barrack is close witha lebanese/nigerian biz guy named chagoury?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I don't but with details can ask"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 3:12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Chagoury about to get indicted in I.a....wants me to rep him...supposed to be close to your guy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt_7032
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor, are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga. \nAre you in? \nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? I will come w bill at that time. Pis let me know."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me„ sultan just left. I will be up for another hour \nor so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:39:47 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower! \nWorked most of fight. \nLets plan rather to meet tmr. \nLets talk tmr. \nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt_7042
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt
subject: January 20, 2017
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom iii", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey,\nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!!\n\nPRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'!! HA HA!\n\nLOVE & KISSES"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt_7048
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt
subject: That was fun , see you in 3 weeks
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "5/19/2014 10:37:05 AM", "subject": "That was fun , see you in 3 weeks", "body": "FP Briefing non- classified\n19 May, 2014\nArticle 1.\tThe National Interest\tWhich Road Will Egypt Take?\nKathryn Alexeeff\nArticle 2.\tNow Lebanon\tWhat Saudi-Iran talks could mean for Lebanon and the\nregion\nAlex Rowell\nArticle 3.\tThe Economist\tIndia's next prime minister: The Modi era begins\nArticle 4.\tThe Christian Science Monitor\tAn India ready to dream big\nEditorial\nArticle 5.\t1-1Urriyet\tWill it be Cyprus' year?\nYusuf Kanli\nArticle 6.\tThe National Interest\tStars Are Aligned for a Solution in Cyprus\nOzdil Nami\nArticle 7.\tThe diplomat\tChina's Instructive Syria Policy\nAdrien Morin"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt_7066
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt
subject: Friday POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:04:53 AM", "subject": "Friday POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nBoston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI.\nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are:\nWhite Plains\n\nTeterboro\n\nOrlando\n\nDulles\n\nOrlando\n\nFortlauderdale\n\nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required\nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full.\n\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12, time TBD (likely PM)\n\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15, time TBD (likely PM)\n\nShould I request parking at Boca?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026601.txt_7067
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026601.txt
subject: A message to Global Conference 2013 Attendees
messages:
  [{"sender": "Skip Rimer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2013 4:20:39 PM", "subject": "A message to Global Conference 2013 Attendees", "body": "Dear Global Conference Registrant:\n\nWe look forward to seeing you in a few days at the 16th annual Milken Institute Global Conference. It’s a full and\nexciting program with a record 620 speakers on 140+ sessions addressing the major economic and policy issues\nof the day. In addition, we have many other events in store that we hope will make your time with us that much\nmore valuable and enjoyable, including a first-time Tuesday night wine tasting and shopping event in the heart of\nBeverly Hills.\n\nWe've made a number of other changes to this year’s program, including the addition of three late-afternoon\nplenary sessions — featuring Congressman and Majority Leader Eric Cantor together with Sen. Harry Reid,\nMajority Leader (Monday); former Vice President Al Gore (Tuesday); and a special session focused on\nAfrica’s brightening future (Wednesday), described below.\n\nWe have also added a larger stage in the Global Conference Pavilion, allowing for a variety of more innovative\nsessions and audience involvement.\n\nPlease note two important program/speaker updates:\n\n° We've saved one of the best for last. The Global Conference closes on Wednesday with “Investing in\nAfrican Prosperity,” featuring Rwandan President Paul Kagame, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair,\nphilanthropist Bill Gates, and Rhonda Zygocki of Chevron, moderated by Institute Chairman Mike Milken.\n\n° Wednesday’s lunch program brings together some of America’s most important health leaders, including\nNancy Brown, CEO of the American Heart Association; Francis Collins, Director of the National Institutes\nof Health; Thomas Frieden, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Andrew von\nEschenbach, former Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, to talk about the scientific\nrevolution that promises to change lives and society.\n\nWe may have moved some panels since you set your schedule, so | encourage you to visit\nwww.globalconference.org for the latest speakers and program.\n\nWithin the next 24 hours, you will be receiving your Global Conference confirmation email. Be sure to\nbring the confirmation email and a photo ID with you to registration.\n\nWe look forward to seeing you. | hope you take advantage of everything the Global Conference has to offer. Most\nimportant, have a great time.\n\nSincerely,\n\nSkip Rimer\nExecutive Director of Programs and Communications\nMilken Institute"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028986.txt_7075
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028986.txt
subject: Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra <MM=111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:57 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind I thought I'd share this\nSee you at 3PM\nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.php"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2016, at 5:43 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "i will forward it. he asked if you would come back again, without the russian. to me it was a woody\nallen movie. you talking conciousness , his wife more concerned with the salad dressing, and the russian\ndeciding the future of syria. . As you know I find ideas no matter how extreme , the root of possible\ninsight, so the other day I had viisitn the psychedelic crowd. one of them has opened a store on 1 st and the\nbowery called the alchemist kitchen. . How about we meet there , I want to see the store and you ride with\nme back uptown. lets say 230? I have left my schedule open after."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 9:52:40 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Yes\nThanks for forwarding it!\nIt was a fascinating evening!\nI've felt a kinship with Woody because he is tortured by existential dilemmas as am I.\nThe Russian was just being Russian- a socialist with right wing tastes . I actually liked him.\nThe wife was being a mother to Woody. I think he's needed that all his life .\nI will meet you at the Bowery at 230 PM\nSend me the address"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022344.txt_7078
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022344.txt
subject: mission acomplished for some
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic <j>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 13 2014 08:14 PM", "subject": "mission acomplished for some", "body": "Philanthropy — Full text articles\n\nRevealed: the world’s most admired people\nStephan Shakespeare — Times\n\nBill Gates is the most admired person in the world, according to a global survey for The Times by YouGov. The man who many\nsee as oe for the democratisation of computing and who is the biggest activist philanthropist across the globe is\n\nIn his home, America, he ranks only 5th, behind Pope Francis, President Obama, Billy Graham, and George W. Bush. Mr\nObama and the Pope have a strong lead in Western nations but Mr Gates is highly regarded in every country polled, from\nBrazil to Egypt, Nigeria to Indonesia, Britain to Russia to Australia. ee as respondents there said: “He\ngot into a good university, but gave up studying to start his business. He has become a rich man despite dropping out of school\n... He has a successful career and a caring heart — he is ordinary, but great.”\n\nThe Queen came highest in Britain and second in Australia, but didn’t make the Indian top ten. Nevertheless she is the most\nadmired woman in the world, in 17th place, closely followed by Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey.\n\nHalf of the top ten admired in Russia are women, including the pop singer Alla Pugacheva and the Queen. That is the highest\nfigure in all countries surveyed — women are strikingly under-represented.\n\nSome light is shed on this by comparing our results with a recent Gallup poll in America, which asked for most admired man\nand woman in separate questions. In that poll, Bill Clinton scored 2 per cent and Hillary Clinton 15. YouGov asked a single\nquestion, not differentiating men and women, and the two Clintons rated about the same. The two polls also show the power of\nthe media to direct public attention: Gallup polled early in December, and Pope Francis was “most admired” by only 4 per cent.\nBy the time of the YouGov survey, Time magazine had made him its Person of the Year, and he shot up to 21 per cent.\n\nBusiness leaders did well in general. YouGov puts Sir Richard Branson 4th in Britain, the Hong Kong billionaire Sir Li Kashing\nwas sixth in China; the Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote was third in his home country; Silvio Santos, a media billionaire,\nwas 4th in Brazil; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the tycoon recently freed by Vladimir Putin, was 8th in Russia; while Warren Buffett,\nwho is admired in India, Pakistan and China, was 8th in the world.\n\nActors and musicians do less well. With the exception of the Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan, Ms Jolie and Stephen\nFry, who confirms his enormous Twitter following by making 7th in Britain, just below Desmond Tutu. Johnny Depp and Brad\nPitt get close to the top in a couple of countries and Justin Bieber did well in Indonesia, but the rock star and anti-poverty\ncampaigner Bono is notable by his absence.\n\nSportsmen were more highly regarded, with the Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar 5th in the world — but only because he is so\nadored in the world’s second-most populous country. The footballer Lionel Messi had broader support, reaching 15th in the\nworld. In Britain, David Beckham squeaked into 10th place.\n\nIn only two countries of the 13 surveyed did no local politician make it into the top ten — Australia and the UK. The omission\nwas most striking in Britain where Nigel Farage, the top politician, was in 16th place. David Cameron received the “most\nadmired” accolade from only two people in a thousand. In Germany, Angela Merkel scored 65 times higher at 13 per cent,\nsecond only to the Pope. Vladimir Putin topped the Russian poll with a whopping 24 per cent, Nicolas Sarkozy was third in\nFrance and Goodluck Jonathan 8th in Nigeria. Edward Snowden, responsible for leaking classified documents that revealed\nthe extent of surveillance by America’s National Security Agency, was 10th most admired in the country that granted him\nasylum, Russia. He also showed strongly in Germany. We also asked who was the most famous person in the world. The"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105.txt_7080
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105.txt
subject:
  Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 4:15:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "Cool"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt_7099
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt
subject: Re: science in Trump time
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new\nPR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time.\n\nIt can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you © But what I really like it's\nactually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes akickstarter with no return, you form a501c3 charity , that can accept donations. and give them out to\nscientists.. it s avery clever idea. good work!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 11:39:24 PM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "I'll think how to execute on it. I'm very focused on my fund but I want it to exist, will find a way"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt_7116
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:58:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt_7117
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern TT", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in\nlondon. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 10:51:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\n\nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt_7141
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stephen Hanson [aa"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:15:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028536.txt_7144
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028536.txt
subject: Memo: Sex offender Jeffrey Epstein talked to FBI to get plea deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Scott J. Link", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2018 11:23:48 PM", "subject": "Memo: Sex offender Jeffrey Epstein talked to FBI to get plea deal", "body": "https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/fbi-epstein-files-say-gave-info-does-explain-sweetheart-deal/NdgitAifcilk6édJgpLV630/?utm_source=newspaper&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=4832804&ecmp=newspaper_email&\n\nFBI Epstein files say he gave info. Does it explain sweetheart deal?\n\nUpdated: 12:28 p.m. Wednesday, May 30, 2018 | Posted: 12:21 p.m. Wednesday, May 30, 2018\n\nUma Sanghvi WEST PALM BEACH —\n\nTen years after convicted Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein escaped federal charges in connection with allegations that he paid dozens of teenage girls for sex, the FBI last week released what appears to be an explosive explanation for what many have long described as a sweetheart deal.\n\n“Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon,” agents wrote in one of dozens of heavily redacted, decade-old memos that were unexpectedly and inexplicably posted on an FBI website known as “The Vault.”\n\nThe simple declaration stunned those who have been following the tortuous and celebrity-studded case for years. It rekindled talk that the billionaire’s 2008 decision to plead guilty to state charges to make the federal investigation disappear was part of a cover up to protect Epstein’s high-powered friends, including President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton and Britain’s Prince Andrew.\n\n“That sentence obviously means something but I, too, am at a loss as to what it really means,” said attorney Brad Edwards, who for a decade has been trying to unravel the mystery of Epstein’s plea deal. “If there was some cooperation I would have expected that we would have been told. However, nothing surprises me at this point.”\n\nIn recent years, federal prosecutors have offered various explanations for why they agreed to drop the case they were building against the 65-year-old enigmatic money manager if he pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges. In court papers, they have said they wanted to get justice for Epstein’s young victims but worried a jury wouldn’t believe them."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.txt_7156
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.txt
subject: Epstein paid three women $5.5 million to end underage-sex lawsuits
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren Indyke", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/2/2019 4:56:48 PM", "subject": "Epstein paid three women $5.5 million to end underage-sex lawsuits", "body": "https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/crime—law/epstein-paid-three-women-million-end-underage-sex-\nlawsuits/8GEJk4YYa2X4ffig4HAqyJ/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030351.txt_7159
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030351.txt
subject: Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Fo", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic -- but to answer a random gmail email, that is not smart!\n\nHow are you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "iknow, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Fo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "‘Thanks for sharing the foxhole’"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029600.txt_7160
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029600.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 2:31:48 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt_7167
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt
subject: trump getting RNC bounce...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2016 4:28:09 PM", "subject": "trump getting RNC bounce...", "body": "Monday, July 25\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) \tPoll \tResults \tSpread\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton \tCNN/ORC \tTrump 48, Clinton 45 \tTrump +3\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton \tCBS News \tTrump 44, Clinton 43 \tTrump +1\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein \tCNN/ORC \tClinton 39, Trump 44, Johnson 9, \nStein 3 \tTrump +5\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \tCBS News \tClinton 39, Trump 40, Johnson 12 \tTrump +1\nClinton vs. Johnson"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt_7169
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt
subject: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Brad Bowen", "recipients": ["Kevin McIntosh", "Ryan McIntosh", "Al Eckert", "Henry Peek", "Terry Kafka", "Coy E. Garrett", "Blake"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:16 PM", "subject": "FW: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "On trump."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Great one. Thanks"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Trump is a problem solver for sure."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka", "Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about. Media holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She's shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I love ole Bernie. Wish he wasn't a damn socialist. He probably reminds you of your Social Studies teacher from Lafayette high...?"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:21:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie's like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60's and 70's."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt_7174
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:12:21 PM", "subject": null, "body": "see video at the bottom of the page as someone at rally printed a picture of you and trump together \nhttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-trump-kicks-out-protesters-from-rally"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022191.txt_7179
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022191.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?\n\nOn Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, i rote:\n\nDefinitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\n\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Illtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\n\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "i rote", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\n\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Illtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\n\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt_7180
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 10:37:36 AM", "subject": null, "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt_7184
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too _:). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. .sorry . itseemsimasymbol for allills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im yourboy . atleast for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "send details ."}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt_7199
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:18:53 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt_7200
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\n1 why are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:56:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt_7204
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i stepped away from the royal jet. if you want to go after the bbj"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I just got my G550 - 5176 under contract at $18.5 and it's going to Pre-Purchase inspection on Monday.\nI'm aware that G550 - 5109 was under contract for $17,600,000.\nAs a company we have 5 G550, 2 G650 and 1 BBJ buyers.\nThat is all I know for now."}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:28:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new, friend asked yesterday. . one in virginia. paid 8. fixed up with 300k. asking 10"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt_7206
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt
subject: Re: NYT
messages:
  [{"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/30/2017 8:23:59 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "High stress."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "30 Apr 2017, at 19:43", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "both have the flu"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAbout time for our actions to turn into theatre and movie pieces.\nShall we talk? Any news from BC/AdR?\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 19:24", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI'm in Serengeti, Tanzania\n\nNo real communication. Cannot open the NYT article. But to judge from the article's title they are at least\nexaggerating if not totally wrong. This attack will not change strategy in a major way on either side. It will\nhowever raise respect for DJT in Moscow and few other capitals. That's not necessarily bad, if the WH won't\nread this change as a precedent which calls to be repeated too often.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 16:06", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/theater/oslo-broadway-review.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F04%2F13%2Ftheater%2Foslo-broadway-review.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014310.txt_7209
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014310.txt
subject: SPX put contingent on higher rates
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda [amanda.ens@???.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [???.com]"], "timestamp": "11/15/2016 2:44:06 PM", "subject": "SPX put contingent on higher rates", "body": "Navigating post-Trump volatility\n\n° We are recording unprecedented divergences in falling equity vol with rising rates vol post Trump’s win. Intra-day S&P realized vol collapsed from near 60% to below 20% in 2d [Chart 1]\n\n° While equities have shown less conviction over what a Trump win means (given strong sector rotation), the bond market has sold off with one of the largest moves in history [Chart 2 & 3]\n\ne Stabilizing rates volatility from here is key to markets remaining calm and while equity upside may continue, it is not without higher risks\n\ne We like cheap optionality to hedge long-equities if rates continue to move sharply\n\nFor investors long equities, we look at ways to cheapen protecting from downside risks in the event of further bond market volatility catalysed by Trump policy uncertainty\n\n° Buy an SPX Apr-17 95% put conditional on US 10Y CMS > 2.5% at maturity for 0.87%\nfe) 70% discount vs. vanilla\nfe) CMS ref. 2.11%, SPX ref. 2,164.2\n\nCMS = constant maturity swap\n\nChart 1: The response in S&P 500 realized equity volatility to the US election surprise was similar to Brexit but more extreme, as the spike in volatility collapsed at record speed"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027053.txt_7222
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027053.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now ie"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Please call me at I\n\nMy number is blocked and it does not go through when | am calling you\nB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.txt_7234
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Roy Black"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:51:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026571.txt_7248
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026571.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/2/2012 2:34:45 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Perfect, my father is in Florence now ; we all fly on Sunday to Tanzania for 6 days with my daughters. \nI believe that the American Ambassador will go back to the US in a few months after the elections , even if President Obama wins. Maybe you want to ask him about the letter for the Interallie before his departure?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "mercredi 31 octobre 2012 23:14", "subject": "RE:", "body": "due to hurrricane , i will not come until december. lets organize a call with your father, or if he likes i am happhy to fly mom and dad to new york. in a couple of weeks when hurrican isssues subside."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt_7254
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt
subject: Re: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication\nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "WO, Feb 2017 at 6:11 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:13 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030392.txt_7255
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030392.txt
subject: Re: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 09:37 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "What else would Mack the Knife do but support those he can trust in!\nBegs the question, who should we seek to silence next!?\nOnward, to bigger, and better things.\n\nI may have already had a stiff one, it’s been a long day, and I get no younger."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:08", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "You are a unique man, Mr McFarlane.\n\nYou came to my defense today with a courage not seen in many people. How do I thank\nyou?\n\nYou have a sense of what is right, and you have a sense of theatre. You mix humor with\ngrit.\n\nThank you John. Never underestimate my recognition of your support. And my respect\nfor your guile.\n\nAnd some day I want to see an ad lib guitar run. You have all the fearlessness of Clapton.\nThank you.\nJes"}, {"sender": "John McFarlane", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "However I do feel we’ve ceased the rally for you [sic] head today.\n\nSurely the fickleminded nature of the angry few will help tie up any loose ends.\nYou owe me a large Scotch.\n\nJohn"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030475.txt_7269
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030475.txt
subject: RE: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 11:17:34 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "I think this is a great article I think viki was clearly very nice.. .1 remember when I got the call when she was thinking about her writing the article 8 years ago...she was spot on here this is the article that citrick should work off of... Home all night"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax [gmaxl@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vani-tyfair.com/online/daily/2on/o3/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaincom/contributors/vicky-ward> March 8, 2011, 2:30 PM"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666.txt_7271
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666.txt
subject: Fwd: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories
messages:
  [{"sender": "Terry", "recipients": ["Jeffery Edwards [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Warren"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:21:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories", "body": "Jeff/Warren: Go directly to photo #9."}, {"sender": "DeMilked <noreply+feedproxyggoogle.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 7, 2019 at 2:48:52 PM GMT+1", "subject": "DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories", "body": "DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt_7283
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: — High\n\nNewsmax.com\n\nLaffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the\nnation’s economic woes is to adopt “common-sense” Reaganomics, the policy’s architect Arthur Laffer claims\nin an exclusive Newsmax interview.\n\nLaffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama’s former Council of\nEconomic Advisors’ chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing.\n\n“Reaganomics would fix any economy that’s in the doldrums,” Laffer said. “It’s not a magic sauce, it’s\ncommon sense.\n\n“You’ve got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business\nnet sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That’s number one.\n\n“Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not\ncure unemployment.\n\n‘Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I’ve ever\nheard of,\" Laffer said.\n\n“Number four you need regulations, but you don’t need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and\ncreate collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here.\n\n“And lastly you need free trade,\" Laffer said. \"Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we\nproduce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn’t sell them those things\nwe produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.”\n\nIn the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor’s was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit\nrating — in fact it should have done so far earlier.\n\nThe agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, don’t do the same they won’t be doing\ntheir jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of\ngovernment revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes.\n\n“If you had a company that had revenues of $2% million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in\nsight, $1% million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what\nwould you rate that company? I surely wouldn’t rate it AAA.\n\n“That is the U.S. situation today,” Laffer said. \"Taxes are about $2 trillion, government spending is about $4\ntrillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don’t see that as being a AAA country.\n\n“Tf the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.”\n\nLaffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030386.txt_7299
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030386.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:50:06 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High\n\nhttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt_7303
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt
subject: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:21:59 PM", "subject": "Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\nSkype =\nFaceTime = email."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt_7310
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt
subject: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["J Jep jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:17:39 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you,Vicky,” was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\n“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true.\n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that “Andy”—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing’s for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him.\n\nAnd Ghislaine?\n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It’s almost impossible not to.\n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I’ve spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else’s I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs’. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as “the Tennis Goddess”) Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability.\nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.\n\n“He saved her,” I remember a close friend of mine telling me. “When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She’s never forgotten that—and never will.”\n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine’s father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive “black hole” he’d fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey’s habits may not have seemed that strange.\n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don’t tend to get to the top by being the world’s most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn’t quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second “wife” for many years whose existence he has been open about.\n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven’t spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she’ll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt_7311
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Blac is"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "Leon Black (qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey- I can’t print this and when we try- it messes up the computer. Perhaps you can have Lesley scan it — or show it to Leon this afternoon. Thanks, Melanie"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 30, 2017 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030393.txt_7334
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030393.txt
subject: Re: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:43 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "As I retire for the night, I’m reminded of a poem my father was awfully fond of. It seems very apt.\n\nGood night, Jes.\n\nWorry not of tomorrow’s end\nHurry not towards falling trees\nIgnore at once, the jesters dance\nSigh, oh sigh, at the folly foiled\nTake down the mighty route of ills\nLest not make a scratch in time\nEvenhanded wins fair stance.\nBroken wooden spoons we take\nLeft, oh left, in such a state"}, {"sender": "John McFarlane <john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:45", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "In all seriousness, do let me know what fires/thorns you want me quelling over the next few days.\n\nIt’s important I stand fast, and alongside you.\n\nYou have carried yourself admirably today."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:40", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "I bet he doesn’t."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Clapton has nothing on me ha!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt_7341
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:23:25 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean? \nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use \nbonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive. \nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do \nyou stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt_7352
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt
subject: Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2017 3:05:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article: \nManafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer  \nTrump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort alerted authorities to Donald Trump Jr.'s infamous meeting \nwith the Russian lawyer during his father's presidential campaign. \nManafort, who is facing increasing pressure from U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller, divulged Trump Jr.'s \nmeeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya about three months ago, Bloomberg reported. \nResponding to a congressional request for information, Manafort revealed the meeting and provided 300 \ndocuments, although FBI agents went on to raid his Virginia home two weeks ago. \nTrump, responding to news of the raid, said, \"I was very, very surprised to see it... .I've always found Paul \nManafort to be a very decent man.\" \nInvestigators are looking into accusations of money laundering in an attempt to pressure Manafort into \ncooperating with the probe into the Trump campaign's possible ties to Russia, two sources told Reuters. \n\"If Mueller's team can threaten criminal charges against Manafort, they could use that as leverage to convince \nhim to cooperate,\" said one of the sources. \nBut the former campaign manager's spokesman Jason Maloni said, \"Paul Manafort is not a cooperating \nwitness.\" \nMaloni also told Bloomberg that Manafort was enlisting the services of a D.C.-based law firm Miller & \nChevalier,which focuses on tax law, to replace WilmerHale, where Mueller previously worked. \nMueller's investigation has extended to global bank transactions involving Manafort, as well as his business \npartner Rick Gates and son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai. \nYohai, who is under investigation for real estate deals he made with Manafort, turned over documents to \nMueller's probe more than two months"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt_7369
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt
subject: Re: Got another call from Connelly..
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon [i"], "timestamp": "9/27/2017 2:56:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was\nasking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea -- I think he\n\nis doing some Trump-related digging too.\nAnyway, for what its worth..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt_7383
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt
subject: Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners
messages:
  [{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": ["Michael"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Another big prize for Miami Herald."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Pile on"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Look at the judges on this thing: the right-thinking establishment to a tee (to a Ta-Nihisi)."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 4:06:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Fix always in"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt_7392
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt_7401
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:23:25 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for\nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like\nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 -60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many\nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\n\nSincerely,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt_7410
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2018 5:52:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "is this a sign trump will escape muller investigation unharmed..\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/20/democratic-party-files-suit-alleging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-\nwikileaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-election-report.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt_7422
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas iii"], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:01:12 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now that strauss kan girl will be shown to be a total liar. maybe your paper should jump on and show that s allegations re andrew are the same,, she also accused numnerous people of having sex with her,, dersh, ehud etc. not one newpaper had the balls to question her credibility"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 8:26:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This girl fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. the da after she accused others. said in writing that she had no credibility, she was never 15 years, old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell. total horseshit,, the daily mail paid her money,, they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth.. Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew,, as many of my employees have. I have never misled you , this girl is a total liar, they authorities should check her austrailain immigration form, you could talk to dershowitz. I will ask if they will cooperate-Prince people"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt_7423
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \". obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a21st century tale of power , sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth ,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:00 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030344.txt_7427
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030344.txt
subject: Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below,.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\n\nHSBC (Suisse) SA\nFAMILY INTEREST L.P.\n22079\n\nBESSIE"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029680.txt_7429
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029680.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "Jan 9, 2013, at 6:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how is it shaping up? what are the biggest hurdles."}, {"sender": "Mohammed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nThe campaign team is starting to come together. We are continuing discussions with Jim and tomorrow we will meet him face to face on skype. We will brief him on the situation here so that he will be able to advice us more effectively. Already he has sent some very useful suggestions and we are working on them. Getting the right people to head various aspects on the campaign is difficult here but we should be able to pull the team together shortly.\n\nWe will need some more help from Ian and Rory because we are still weak on international communication. Some old negative stuff keeps coming up in the Guardian newspaper in England. But most of the international media is not paying much attention to Maldives right now.\n\nI have asked Rory to help find a full time communications guy to stay here for about a year to work with me. He doesn't have to be an expert, just a good graduate student would do. Some really positive stuff is also happening now and we need the world to know about them.\n\nWorld Energy Forum and CGI guys are here. I am meeting Clinton people in a few minutes.\n\nI have some funding now but will ask all friends to help raise more later when things start happening in full swing. Election is now scheduled to early September.\n\nHope all is well and look forward to seeing you here in the not too distant future.\n\nWarm regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 17, 2013, at 7:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my friend in sweden, lisa svensson, would be perfect as your right hand orgainzing your team„ she has diplomaitc experieince and is currently amabssador to the oceans for sweden"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nWould be great if Lisa could visit us. She sounds like the right person to help us get organized.\n\nMaldives just got elected Vice President of International Renewable Energy Agency. We are also Vice Chair of the UN Human Rights Council. Not too bad considering we had so much bad coverage this year internationally.\n\nBest regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "18 January, 2013 2:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "also be advised that thorbjorn jagland is a great friend."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I remember meeting Jagland at your place when I came with Sultan."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 18, 2013, at 5:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "as chairman of the council of europe , he is really mr human rights, Im sure that if he can be of help, he will"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nNeed your advice.\n\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion dollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government promissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special purpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company can only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount lent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the finance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a large amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable about this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. I am very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading politician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for presidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "1/27/2013 4:15:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it is a scam.. what they will' tell you is the only thing they want is a vehicle and a bank acct and that you have no risk in setting it up. if the money doesn't come in , you lose nothing„ afterwards howver they use all the info you provide to try to defraud other people, saying, see , the govt of the maldives is our client and for only 250 k , we can get you a piece of the action. there is a treasury fraud site , at the us treasury web page, . very similar deals."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt_7432
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt
subject: Re: Great seeing you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephen Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel, \nIt was great seeing you. Hope to see you on my next trip which is every other week. Let me know when Andrew Lucasi is coming to town."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from California. \nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest. \nLook forward to hearing from you."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 8:03 PM -0500", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. i will pick up all costs. thanks"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "have him call me or better email his no and ill set something up with gerry and i...good trip to ny and isle...joel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "jack , aweekend when he could bring a friend would be appreciated"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Brian Baker jpm"], "timestamp": "1/7/2010 10:54:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "use my name"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030350.txt_7434
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030350.txt
subject: Re: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2017 12:41:05 AM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2017, at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "good, how are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029858.txt_7436
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029858.txt
subject: Small World
messages:
  [{"sender": "Hope, Doug", "recipients": ["Dave Hope"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 20, 2012 8:42 AM", "subject": "Small World", "body": "Dave, \nTalk about a small world. I got on the airplane Saturday night and opened up the Palm Beach newspaper and \nhere's what I found (see attached). Remember \"Bear\", Warren's friend from NY. Well, he is a Billionaire \n(Literally and really) and always seems to be in the news in South Florida. He competes with Trump on big \nproperty deals and seems to be quite the womanizer. The only problem is he goes after some of the young ones \nsometimes and must not check there ID's. \nOh well, I thought you might get a kick out of this article. What a small world. \nTake good care!! \nDoug"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030719.txt_7440
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030719.txt
subject: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\n\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "All good. Bannon with me"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 21, 2018, at 09:37", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "and i thought- I had tsuris"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:54 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "You and your boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie Get Hard.\n\nSent via tin can and string."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 21, 2018 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "you mean DONNI TEE"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 2:54:13 PM", "subject": "RE: hey", "body": "I’d rather be in Donni Dee’s shoes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt_7443
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt
subject: Re: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDuration: 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15, 2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if confirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein's victims' attorneys said Tuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims' lawyers on Monday, said they had recused themselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims."}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2019, at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:51:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025904.txt_7446
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025904.txt
subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito <Mil>", "Joichi (Joi) Ito"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2016 at 11:07:17 PST", "subject": "Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Joi, I am so very sorry but Jeffrey is canceling his trip to Vancouver! It is very sudden and he is sorry, but he is flying to Washington, DC now. I am sure he will be in touch with you... Please accept our apologies.. Lesley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 16 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Good not bad"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2016 7:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Good. Was worried you getting deposed about Trump or something. :-)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033306.txt_7447
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033306.txt
subject: Peter Thiel's Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming - NYTimes.com
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2016 12:00:41 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel's Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming - NYTimes.com", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/technology/peter-thiels-embrace-of-trump-has-silicon-valley-squirming.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032756.txt_7463
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032756.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 1:50:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Love the guy...(you were deadass right)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.txt_7466
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call a time out, its on the field and done with dignity, you cant retreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. in the next quarter she will appreciate whatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might want to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm.\nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "coming from you -- not mutually exclusive"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "?.."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "you can be both thoughtful and face to face"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "That is true.\nInteresting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "last i looked ( sic), you do not have ovaries."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "I hear you."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 8:35:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Home Boston. Will try to call"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030731.txt_7469
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030731.txt
subject:
  ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 10:16:04 AM", "subject": "‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030725.txt_7474
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030725.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in london. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\n\nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give co in russia id appreciate it. . dont know parties. ride tolondon . shesa futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:02:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am finding out what the plan is in Moscow - send me her number.I will fly from Moscow to Spain (not London)\n\nLet’s discuss DB. Seeing Chairman today in Munich..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033094.txt_7475
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033094.txt
subject: trump looking for attny, considering rifkin
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid [as"], "timestamp": "6/6/2018 10:29:46 PM", "subject": "trump looking for attny, considering rifkin", "body": "trump looking for attny, considering rifkin"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt_7477
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt
subject: Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Marty"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "With the understanding that we have not yet made determinations about what will or will not be included in our broadcast, here are the bullet points of the principal allegations Ms._________________ raised in the ABC interview regarding Mr. Epstein. I'm available on cell if you wish to discuss. We'd ask for your response as soon as possible — best if by close of business Friday. Thanks And I'm always available to talk to you if you wish to communicate with us."}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks"}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 3:36 PM", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings. This is James Hill of ABC News. I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein — and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener. ABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with (formerly known as Jane Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week. We would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mt Epstein. Can you tell me who among you I should be in contact with? Should you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business Wednesday. Thanks kindly,"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22 2015 07:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029864.txt_7485
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029864.txt
subject: SS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2015 10:00:33 PM", "subject": "SS", "body": "in case you, unlike Donald Trump, would like to collect Social Security\nage 62 2,002 per month\nage 66 2,669 per month (full retirement age)\nage 70 3,587 per month"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030662.txt_7510
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030662.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when I get settled..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 5:44:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "In between"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032605.txt_7517
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032605.txt
subject: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:33:39 PM", "subject": "Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers)\nwould like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nwould you be open to talk to them?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023360.txt_7519
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023360.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nAs you will recall, we used this same exchange agent last year on the Calder 1031. At the time, we discussed\nthe merits of using a gallery versus a commercial exchange agent and my recommendation to Leon was to use a\ngallery. I felt that there were advantages to using a commercial exchange agent instead of a gallery on the 1031\nside (e.g., less likelihood of a breach of confidentiality, IRS familiarity with CDEC in the event of an audit,\nsecurity of funds), but that a commercial exchange agent gave us less comfort on the sales tax side. Leon did\nnot want to use a gallery because he was concerned about confidentiality and he did not want to have to ask a\ngallery that he did not do much business with to act as exchange agent.\n\nWhen Leon first discussed the exchange for the Cezannes with me a few weeks ago, I asked him if he wanted\nto use the same exchange agent as last year, or if he wanted to use a gallery. I said that a gallery carried little to\nno risk on the sales tax side, but I reminded him that he had not wanted to use a gallery last year for the Calder\nbecause of confidentiality reasons. He said to use the same exchange agent as before, which made sense to me\nbecause he was extremely concerned about confidentiality with the purchase of the Cezannes.\n\nI will find out about sales tax audits and will let you know. The exchange agent has had a New York resale\ncertificate since 2014 and has been engaged in art transactions like this since then, but I do not believe they\nhave been audited. I will check, though, and I will also ask the Herrick lawyer if any of his clients who have\ndone similar deals have been audited.\n\nBest,\n\nHeather"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022272.txt_7521
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022272.txt
subject: Re: Oil options
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nay Gupta", "recipients": ["njeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Vinit Sahni/db"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey\nJust got off the phone with Vinit.\nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated I'd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and out.\nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given the 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is raised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show Merkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from Russia. Germany gets 30%.\nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each other past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused on European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up.\nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est):\n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92\nand\n35d expiry 16apri12014 underlying clk4 97.59\n** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM 100 call for 25. Net pay Scents. But 5d is a bit short for me.\n**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c (4.5usd OTM) for 76cents.\nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask.\nIf 5d is too short and 35d is too long / not enough gamma, Tazia may be able to source liquidity from the street. Am Cc'ing her for any live pricing or additional comment\nBest\nNay"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time we'll be much quicker."}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "I am on a plane to and from tokyo tomorrow next 2-3 days, if u need something otherwise available 24/7 on"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Vinit Sahni"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 3:39:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "thanks 4 hours for a quote in a normally fast moving market ?\nconfirms my voiced concerns"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032611.txt_7524
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032611.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "PO", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are We meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["PO"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["x"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_03261 1"}, {"sender": "{iE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["{iE"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "{jin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["{jin"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 10:25:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. im in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry 1 can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033269.txt_7546
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033269.txt
subject: Porn star: Trump said | reminded him of Ivanka after sex | New York Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/17/2018 7:08:41 PM", "subject": "Porn star: Trump said | reminded him of Ivanka after sex | New York Post", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/01/17/porn-star-detailed-alleged-affair-with-trump-in-201 1-interview/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031226.txt_7552
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031226.txt
subject: Fwd: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/18/2012 4:11:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep \nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this \nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\nBut he is a bit busy I gather! \nAnyway, hope got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail \nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific \nagenda and she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement? \nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..? \nLet me know what you think! \nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend \nGoldsamt! First prize for perseverance! \nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful! \nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS! \nKRAM \nBE"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033241.txt_7563
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033241.txt
subject: yikes
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 6:36:57 PM", "subject": "yikes", "body": "I’m against censorship, and that includes Kathy Griffin. CNN eats chickenshit. What she\ndid is nothing compared to Trump’s murderous evil.\n\nP.S. THIS LITERALLY REEKS WITH IRONY...THIS IS WHERE CNN GETS ITS\n\nCHICKENSHIT. A COMMERCIAL THAT THEY’RE LOSING BECAUSE OF KATHY:\n\nSQUATTY POTTY - KATHY GRIFFIN \"FULL OF SHIT\" (2017)\n(USA)\n\nSecond week of May this Kathy Griffin ad rolls out digital media only, where Kathy tells people that they are “full of\nshit.\" Literally. See, Kathy Griffin has a potty mouth but also a selling point - the reason you'd use the squatty potty\nis to properly empty your bowels. \"It's like a colonic” she explains, but without that hose up your ass. A cute blue\nturd bleeps her potty mouth but the point is still made.\n\nYou may remember Squatty Potty's pooping unicorn video created by the Harmon Brothers in 2015. Now Kathy\nGriffin is their first celebrity spokesperson. The brand’s CEO and co-creator, Bobby Edwards, finds her quirky, brave\nand fearless, which makes her a good ambassador for the brand as they target women with this campaign.\nEdwards says the brand team fell in love with the \"full of shit\" idea from Bravery Films, \"it got the biggest laughs\"\nfrom staff. Howie Ronay, Bravery Films’ founder and chief creative officer, a former FCB exec who worked on the\n2013 viral hit “Ship My Pants” for Kmart explains: “We know a lot of people struggle with this issue, and we decided\nto take a common colloquial phrase and use it literally.” Basically, this is \"ship my pants II.\" Enough about poop, not\nall ads can be great."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030886.txt_7581
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030886.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:29:14 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Just landed to Iga. \nAre you in? \nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? I will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor, are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon \nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031540.txt_7584
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031540.txt
subject: Subject to change
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 10:02:03 PM", "subject": "Subject to change", "body": "So the publisher wants me to trim down 700 to 400 pages in \"The Best of...\" collection. Tsk tsk. Below will be \nthe revised mini-essay to serve as the final piece. Although I detest Trump, to be fair, I realized, thanks to \nyou, that I had no evidence that he had raped a 13-year-old, though I did have have evidence that, as an adult, \nthere was evidence that she made an accusation. Also, I added another sentence with a positive ending. \nMeanwhile, Happy Earth Day. \nThe Last Word: Yikes! \nWhen George W. Bush was elected president in the year 2000, it was due to the electoral college (a rigged system \nwhich originally intended to prevent slaves from voting and evolved to gerrymandering), even though Bush's \noppone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030892.txt_7588
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030892.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "in paris„ emailed steve - no response yet„ you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be an eye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. . http ://www.thedailybeast. com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-j effrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence. I am curious what you think about Vanity fair piece? How the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew? Who would know that? Some of your employees?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 2:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "re vanity fair, paul seems imbalanced„ so many intricate computing details but fuzzy on reality. He seems like a wife that has been divorced for a younger girl. re woody allen„ my fault„ Charlie rose was also there. he has a big mouth.-- wasn't there a science person or someone that worked with consuelo that you thought intersting?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Agree. The book is much worst — it is coming out April 19th. Will tell you more. Try Consuelo — I can't think of other people right now in Paris. Few that I might interest you are traveling. I am so being answering on Consuelo's emails that you are better off to contact her directly. Steve will know many interesting people in Paris. He has great circle there."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 6:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "not nice for bill. It just makes choosing new friends even more difficult"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 1:36:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Not nice at all. Just wait to see the book. It is disgusting, >From someone whom he help made 30B. And who was silent out the whole issue for 27 years, pretending to be a great friend. At least try to discuss/solve the problem outside the entre press. I do feel sorry for Bill. How do you choose your close friend? Whom to trust?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026028.txt_7589
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026028.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Afri zp", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "November 29, 2016 at 3:26:13 AM GMT-3:30", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Larry, \nI'll be very please to meet or take you for diner. My mobile in Doha is"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Who is the guy you have set me up with? \nSpend zero effort on anything about me w trump. Seeing his approach to conflict of interest, his Putin proximity, and his mindless response on Castro death I'm best off a million miles away. \nUntil they are deeply humbled by the fuckups that are sure to come, I serve myself and country best by doing nothing that involves loyalty to them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 29, 2016, at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "ok, except I hope they can rely on you to give them guidance privately after the fact.? Karim Wade. is the son of the president of Senegal. ( they just found GAS offshore ). He is well educated and one of the most important figures in west africa. however full disclosure , he was put in jail to remove him from running against the current president . He is in qatar awaiting his political return to power which is almost guaranteed. He is the most charismatic ,and rational of all the africans and has theire respect."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 12:13:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Always quiet advice to anybody who can use it. Try always discreet. If u become associated publicly w something the reputations converge. Looking fwd to meeting Karim."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023348.txt_7598
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023348.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Po"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "no charge, and review the work done by tom/ joslin.\n\njoslin you and I should sit. you won't like it. AT ALL> he is afraid of telling you the story, as he belives brad\nis your guy and does not want to get fired. ada still refusing to share income tax opinions based on privilege\n, not under control at all. ? ? joslin said that murphy is not the cfo, as you told me but the coo. and the cfo is\nthe same guy that reported to andrew, mistakes after mistakes not picked up by murphy who joslin described\nasakind buffoon . he suggested a new ceo or coo who can make decisions. someone with some financail\nexperience. he asked for a chief decision maker. 50 for year roll in money owed . 30 till july , most up front\nneeded\n\nNov of 13 : I told you tom Eileen and Ralph were not up to the job, you disagreed very vocally\nand strongly , \" Ralph wrote the book, Tom has been doing it for 15 years and Eileen ran the trading desk at\nMorgan Stanley. \" Ada who had been working on all your documents for years while at the bank had\nbeen brought in- house but created more issues that didn't exist. and phaidon was its own animal\n\nDec 13. you were again annoyed that i said that they needed to be replaced and said \"i was talking out of both\nsides of my mouth.\" first time ( email available)\n\nJan 14, you decided that no third year was necessary for my help. andi told you i thought that unwise and\neven suggested giving you an option at 40 m so there would be no tension\n\nMar 14, I told you that to do the job right , my team would need to do it. not yours it would not be\ninexpensive, but it would get done properly, you chose not to do itand said lets wait and see\n\nApril 14. We agreed to clean up various past mess.with the end of my work OCT 15th only then would i get\npaid.. urged JPM ( first of 14 reminders)\nGS and db accounts to be set up in order to bring your financial structure into the 21 century\n\nJuly 26 , Icame to bens party, said new people needed to be hired, keep Eileen till end of year, and Ada till\nmarch, you suggested getting ada out earlier\n\noct structured the art partnership , but you wanted to wait until you fully understood ramifications formed the\ndoc in dec to have it in 14,\n\nnov/ dec 14 I told you I considered my work complete separate from art partnership. gave list of things to do.\nthree months of you and your high school friend , trying to build a house with little of the relenavt\nexperience. its silly . still no accurate numbers accounting _, charts, etc\n\njan 15, I told you joslin cannot hire people, has not so for more than 5 years, former job in a public accounting\nfirm.\n\napril 15 . no senior accountant even in the wings. joslin talking about reaching out to hire the only person he\nknew( worked in the past with dagazsitno ) and i interviewed 15 months ago. and rejected. low level . He\ndoes not want to hire himself out of a job, spoke to brad last night he wants a coo so that he does not feel\ndemoted\n\nyour choice!, ( brad maybe does have insight - to your credit, might have been right when he said- jeffrey you\nshould realize this is only about leon not wanting to pay more money , ( 1 ignored his summary , along with his\ncomments on the risk of fracturing"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt_7600
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt
subject:
  From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted

messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/7/2019 3:36:37 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted", "body": "DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-opens-probe-into-plea-bargain-awarded-by-trump-official-to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein\n\nIt is bizarre to see who tries to get political mileage out of this."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033255.txt_7603
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033255.txt
subject: Dylan Love of TNW & Business Insider (EEE person)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groft", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2017 8:27:09 PM", "subject": "Dylan Love of TNW & Business Insider (EEE person)", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, I was happy to meet you this morning.\n\nYou asked to see some things I’ve written. Here’s my (only slightly out of date) professional web presence, including\nLetterman clip:\n\nwww.thedylaniove.com\n\nHere are a few stories I've written more recently that are not displayed on my site:\n\nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/33173-virtual-reality-psychedelic-drugs\nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/11766-how-instant-translation-tech-will-change-the-way-the-world-talks-and-listens\n\nhttps://thenextweb.com/contributors/2017/09/14/russians-use-technology-influence-elections\nhttps://www.businessinsider.com/quantum-technologies-conference-2017-8\n\nYou might get a special kick out of this Trump story:\nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/20029-transhumanist-presidential-candidate-zoltan-istvan-donald-trump-new-technologies\n\nWhat kinds of media goals/story ideas are interesting to you? Masha has made it clear that she wants me to write\nsomething about you, but that’s much more your call to make. I suggest that there is mileage to be gained by quoting you\nin a story about how proper implementation of cryptocurrency might solve financial corruption issues.\n\nI travel back to Austin, Texas tomorrow evening, but am of course reachable. Thanks again for your time this morning.\n\n-Dylan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028950.txt_7617
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028950.txt
subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nMay I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your \nadvice about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for \nPoetry in America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the \nbottom a message just for you.... \n-Lisa \nThat you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose \nsupport— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to \nrealize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to \nproduce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of \nhumanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and \ninformal, online and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to \nbegin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work. \nWhether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker's Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal \nsponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an \nelusive friend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or \nprovided overnight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you \nhighlighted our work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors; \nwhether you flew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or asked \nyour children's school to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation to take \nan interest in the project, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of finance, or of \ndistribution; whether you praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you enabled what we \nhave done. \nHere's what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak \npeeks of works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects. \n• The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-\nproduction between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new \nproduction company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring  \nBill Clinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl \nSandburg, Katie Couric on Elizabeth Bishop, Nas on Whitman, and many more scheduled for \nnationwide launch in 2017. \n• Poetry in America's many initiatives to reach Middle and High School teachers and their \nstudents are taking root. Our first online course for Middle and High School Teachers, Poetry of \nthe City, will launch this Spring with the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Companion \nmaterials to this course will be made available for free on PBS LearningMedia. This course is \ndesigned to meet the needs of English Language Arts and Social Studies teachers in the US and \ninternationally. \n• We are eager to begin production of The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky. Designed, too, for \nMiddle and High School teachers, The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky will draw English Language \nArts instruction into dialogue with science, and will include extraordinary footage of the natural  \nworld, conversations with poets, scholars, and scientists as well as footage shot in class and in the \nfield with great teachers. \n• A recent partnership with Greenwich Country Day School and the Success Academy Network \nof charter schools will provide a base for the production of a new collection of classroom-ready \neducational material on The Poetry of Art Sport, and Play. This collection will include \ndiscussions on poems filmed everywhere from sports fields to Broadway theaters, and will feature \ndancers, athletes, fashion designers, and more. \n• With a growing archive of footage capturing teachers and students reading American poems, \nwe are eager to expand our reach and move into America's schools, disseminating, testing, \nand learning from teachers and students using our materials. We hope to be able to begin work \nevaluating the impact of poetry on literacy levels and character development and, eventually, to \nproduce a full suite of materials that foster character development along with intellectual growth. \nWorking closely with such partners as The Nantucket Project, Nautilus Magazine, The Aspen Ideas \nFestival, and The Big Think, and, of course, HarvardX, Harvard's provider of free open online \ncourses, we are continuing to create rich educational media on poetry for adult learners and \nlifelong learners. These materials include short form videos such as this one on Robert Pinsky's  \n\"Shirt\" (as featured in The New Yorker), and, this spring, the sixth module of the free seven-part \nPoetry in America MOOC, which has registrants in over 150 countries. \nGrowing rapidly, and outpacing our current staff and infrastructure, Poetry in America has a \nfundraising goal this year of 2.5 million dollars to fund its expanding group of projects. We've taken \na big step, hiring the design agency Threespot to help us develop our web presence. Our \nwebsite— to launch early 2016— will eventually serve as an online hub for our TV show and \neducational projects. We hope you'll join us then for a virtual launch! \nFinally, Jeffrey, you have been such a wonderful supporter of my Poetry in America project. The \nLeon Black gift changed everything for me last year. It paid salaries for staff I desperately needed \nto complete projects (detail below), but first and foremost, it gave me leverage, enabling me to set \ndown a solid Harvard base for my activities by giving the school something to point to: this public \nhumanities project among the list of projects the Dean supports. The money did it: as soon as they \nheard about the gift, they took my project more seriously. Because of that gift, the Faculty of Arts \nand Sciences, which is space-stingy, found and rewired a studio space for me to house my video \nproduction operation and team. That gift woke up the Deans to the importance of Harvard's role in \nproducing the highest quality humanities content for the WORLD, and not just for Harvard \nstudents. My main employee has half of her salary paid with these funds, and the foundation of our \ncollection for PBS LeamingMedia is being made with this support. This gift represented one of the \nmost consequential shifts of the last year, allowing me create content and launch projects this year \nthat make future projects that much more likely. If I can keep this base sturdy at Harvard, refilling \nthese coffers, I will be that much more able to keep working. \nI am also so grateful for the help you gave me in defining my project for Templeton, and, what help \nyou have offered to give in bringing them around. I have, since Templeton turned me down, gotten \nfunding to produce video on two of the poems I'd proposed to Templeton and to create, and test, \nthat video in schools as I proposed. One of my partners in that project is Success Academy, where \nI could also expand my work with Templeton. And there are still other poems that may satisfy their \ncharacter criteria more fully, including the third of the poems I'd originally proposed and that Joe \nBiden had agreed to discuss with me (on parenthood and humility). At this point, I'm gaining the \nplatform and the name recognition to be an effective spokesperson for the foundation on building \nliteracy and character in the schools. \nIt really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking \nabout me. You push back a lot (as Larry does), and it's always annoying but I always learn. \nWith abundant gratitude, \nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "That's ideal. Larry's away and I'll be working all day. I'm free any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Dec 2, 2015, at 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Do you know Chomsky, he Is with me"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 5:54:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "did you want to send the below to Lisa? (or have me ask her?)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014717.txt_7627
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014717.txt
subject: Buy hedges for May expiry
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "3/16/2017 6:27:30 PM", "subject": "Buy hedges for May expiry", "body": "David Woo (BAML head of FX, Rates and EM Strategy, very highly regarded across our client base) is back from meetings in DC with senior policymakers. Bottom line: sees market pullback over the next 6-8 weeks on near term policy disappointment and recommends buying protection such as S&P puts — very cheap and market is priced for perfection right now. May expiry 100%/90% SPX put spread costs 1.7% (6:1 gross max payout) David Woo takeaways • #1 focus these days is tax reform - if they don't get it done by Jan 2018, it won't happen at all, and then Republicans would be out of a job when midterm elections come • ACA has to be completed first — and it was a mistake to tackle this before tax reform. Obamacare difficult with only 52 seats in the Senate but Ryan has gone too far to back away from ACA and refocus on tax reform as a priority. McConnell's ACA target is mid-April and then they can start to focus on tax reform 2H April at the earliest. • Position for a market pullback over the next 6-8 weeks on bad headlines, data rollover (consumer confidence) as market focuses on ACA, low approval ratings and lack of progress with tax reform — buy early- or mid-May expiries vol and SPX puts are cheap — • Still long term bullish • 95% tax reform still happens this year (2H17 or Jan 2018) because Republicans know it has to happen this year or they are sitting ducks in 2018 and potentially unelectable for 6 years • Predicts no progress on tax reform over the next 6 weeks and then Republicans rally together to get behind a new plan and get it done (enter Woo's VAT proposal) — with market messy in the meantime • Trump is obsessed with the stock market — when he sees it trade lower, he will act • Regarding valuation adjustment tax (VAT) vs. border adjustment tax, Woo favors a 5% VAT over BAT o Why there is a <10% chance current proposal of BAT will get passed • Paul Ryan/Keven Brandy's proposal implies USD will appreciate +25%. Ryan is telling retailers this will happen but this is completely unrealistic and has serious consequences. Why this cannot happen: • $20tn in non-USD assets owned by US households - $5tn hit on country's balance sheet • EM has —$4tn in USD-denominated debt — increase of $1tn in EM debt and hurts US investors ultimately • —30% corporate profits are overseas ($400bn — so $100bn hit to [PS) — even exporters get hit — counterproductive • Commodity prices are in USD — hits purchasing power of rest of world in commodities — would see oil in the mid-$30s — hits Russia, Brazil, even Exxon • 60% of central bank reserves are in USD — this would go above 70% - would foreign CBs want to hold this much when the US economy is 25% of global GDP? Yields would need to increase o BAT could get hung up with WTO (3-4 years.) Under BAT, wages are deductible (imported goods taxed as a share of total value but domestic goods taxed on only profits) — trade partners like Canada, Japan would take this to the WTO and we would wait 4 years for a verdict o 5% VAT is WTO compliant and has several benefits • VAT levels playing field for US imported vs exported goods (no longer see BMW's cheaper in the US than Germany) • VAT is revenue neutral — would raise enough revenue to cut corporate tax rate to 15%, even 10% possibly • While consumption taxes like VAT can hit the poor (Democrats hate them), there is room for carve-outs on groceries, etc. There will be pushback from Republicans who hate lack of visibility of VAT as well. Only person who can pass this is Trump. • Under BAT, the working class is arguably hit even worse than under VAT o BAT would cause prices to go up at WMT and TGT (most of Trump's supporters shop there) o Retailers would raise prices but exporters won't lower prices o 5% VAT will result in a smaller average rise in prices (not entirely passed through), so less disruptive — would need USD to strengthen only 3-4% • Where does this leave us? Only Trump can cut through the logjam. • Woo prefers Europe over US right now. European equities are climbing a wall of worry • Getting positive on energy • Buy the dip in May (-6 weeks). But own early-May or mid-May equity puts now. • Other anecdotes o Regardless of your political preference, he thinks we all need Trump to succeed or the economy will get Bernie Sanders or worse. o Tillerson vs Kerry — Woo thinks Tillerson is actually working and getting things done, as opposed to Kerry who just cared about the Nobel. • Thus sees zero risk of a trade war with China • NAFTA is really more about China, not Mexico - and will ultimately benefit Mexico. Renegotiating NAFTA will remove the ability for Chinese exports to come in tariff-free through Mexico. o Mnuchin and Cohn really know what they're doing and Woo thinks they will get there on VAT/ tax reform • Cases for tax reform 1. US marginal tax rate = 35 % = highest among OECD = diminished returns to investment 4 solution = decrease marginal tax rate 2. US taxed on global income vs. territorial like other major economies. Issue because 1) US companies hold over $2t in capital overseas and 2) US companies acquiring smaller foreign companies to relocate headquarters internationally 4 solution = shift to territorial tax system 3. US = only OECD country w/ no VAT which puts US produced goods at disadvantage. (VAT — producer of exported goods get rebate while importers pay) 4 solution = create VAT • Solutions have nothing to do with stimulus, will allow companies to take risk, invest, grow, and critical for global growth for next 10 yrs And from earlier presentations/calls: 1. He mentioned on our March 1st tax reform call that the US is the only country amongst OECD without a VAT. BMW's thus cost less in the US than in Germany, as foreign companies get a VAT rebate when they export. US companies do not and they have to pay import tax. He views tax reform as very bullish for USD and yields (bearish for bond prices) and thinks the market is underpricing this. His rationale for the bullish USD and higher yields story is that tax reform encourages more money to come home to the US, adds US investment, evens the playing field for US companies — all good for US growth longer term and bullish the dollar. He had wanted tax reform by the August recess but then Senate would need to pass the bill by July, so they would need a bill to work with by May for the House to pass it in May — which means they need a bill to work with by the end of March (running out of time!) BAT is the only really controversial aspect holding back tax reform even though it's a small part (2 paragraphs of the 50-page Ryan-Brady plan) — still vague on details but he hoped they're learning from their mistake of releasing a half-baked travel ban that imploded after a week. 2. From a panel discussion last week: • Woo actually disagrees with some people's view that there is euphoria in the market. With real yields at -30bp, the fixed income market is pricing in pessimism on Trump (and as I've mentioned, our colleagues in fixed income/FX and their clients have been quite a bit more bearish than those in equities.) • Believes there is fear of stagflation in the market, while gold going through the roof on worries of inflation. • However, if the US$ strengthens by 25%, it will be deflationary. Dangerous for EM countries loaded in US$ debt, esp in the wake of boarder adjustment tax reform talk. • Tax reform is the only thing that matters. o US companies have $2-2.5trn of dormant cash sitting on their B/S outside of the US to avoid paying tax. o US is the only OECD country without a VAT tax. o What needs to happen is: implement a VAT tax that is border adjusted, and fix corporate tax rate. This will not only boost US economy, but will give a jolt to the world economy as well. o Positive that there is a solution, reform momentum on tax is strong regardless of political affiliation. There is a road out of the quagmire. o Question is: why when most other issues are getting leaked out of the White House, information on tax reform is not being leaked at all? Could it be a sign that the administration believes it is that important, and trying not to mess up on execution? [Or you could argue that there is nothing to leak at this point!] o On timing of tax reform: It is crucial we get a blue print of tax reform in the next 2-3 weeks [now 1-2 weeks], because Congress would like to raise debt ceiling while discussing tax reform before summer recess. o July 29th is start of summer recess, which means need to pass by May, requiring the bill proposal to be ready by March. Therefore, in the next few weeks, we need to see progress for an August deadline. o On personal income tax, Trump and Obama are actually on the same page in terms of taxing the wealthy. • US banks have $100bn of excess capital in reserve: beyond what they need. Next big growth area for US banks is commercial banking loans. Growth driver for US economy will be easy access to credit • Ryan-Brady Tax Blueprint released in 2016 - not many have actually read it, but many of the corporate clients seem better informed than hedge fund investors on this topic of late. • Rates: Just two weeks ago, the market was putting a less than 20% chance of a March 15th rate hike, vs now, it is priced in at an 86% chance. At this point, equities will sell off if no hike. • Fed will not hike in May ahead of French elections. 3. David Woo's latest \"Cause and Effect\" is attached 4. David Woo's Top Rates and FX Trades for 2017 is also attached. Woo believes that Brexit and the US election have signaled that the world has changed. These ground shifts have been brought on by a backlash to globalization, increasingly viewed as the culprit for wage stagnation, growing disparity of income and wealth between the rich and the poor, and the loss of national identity. For the year ahead, we recommend being bearish 5y US rates (seeing higher yields), long USDJPY (weaker JPY) and short a basket of EM LatAm long bonds (Mexico, Brazil and Colombia). But in the near term, we urge caution with the reflation trade. Short by US real rates (seeing higher yields) offers the best risk-reward after recent moves. Regards, Amanda"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt_7629
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt
subject: Re: Some of those girls | invited to ibiza
messages:
  [{"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls | invited to ibiza", "body": "Hello Jeffrey\n\nA great friend of mine rented Huge House in Ibiza so invited a lots of girls from Russia all models because they will be doing the shootings down there for several magazines with and great scout named Tigrane He use to scout For Trump but he deosnt work for him any more he coming with 12 girls the first weeck 22th of Jully then 13 others the second weeck from the th of 5 th of august\n\nHe would like to meet you . I just called Jean Luc to see with him if he can come too that will be great to build this great network for Mc2\n\nPlease let me know if you can come to spend some time with us\n\nMy best regards"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Siad"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 16 2010 04:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls | invited to ibiza", "body": "tigran has the best taste next to you.. ,, iam happy to meet him, he had a girl named[jjjin paris, that he had told many bad things about me."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt_7634
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tim Zagat"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 4:26:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im back in ny after the 15th of sept"}, {"sender": "Tim Zagat", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI'm sending you a copy of House of Trump, House of Putin in case you haven't already received 10. \nWhen are you available to get together?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030152.txt_7650
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030152.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Sicd"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you call me\n\nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza with 8 top girls he said he would like to build some thing with you\n\ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this meeting even Jean Luc could doo a great biz also\n\nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any deals with anybody before he meet with you .\n\nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me know what is your plans\nPe\n\nwarmest regards\n\nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Sicd", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2010 1:32:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the other girl name is Anastasia kuznetsova"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029403.txt_7651
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029403.txt
subject: HARVARD In the News
messages:
  [{"sender": "HMS-in the News <HMS_In_The_News@HMS.HARVARD.EDU>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2017", "subject": "HARVARD In the News", "body": "jy HARVARD In the News\n\nCOMMUNICATIONS AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS\n\nWEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2017\n\nFlexibility on ‘essential benefits’ will increase cost of insurance for pregnancy, addiction and mental illness\n\nSTAT\n\nRichard Frank (HMS) co-authored this opinion piece arguing that the Republican health care bill could drive up the cost of coverage for pregnancy care, newborn care, and mental illness and addictive disorders treatment.\n\nDeepak Chopra speculates about Trump’s brain\nUSA Today\n\nA noted alternative medicine advocate is the latest medical professional to speculate about President Trump’s mental health. Rebecca Brendel (HMS/Mass General) discusses the so-called Goldwater rule of the American Psychiatric Association that discourages physicians from expressing public opinions about people whom they are not treating.\n\nCan my doctor out me to my parents?\nU.S. News & World Report\n\nThe article discusses the confidentiality, legal and ethical conundrums faced by LGBTQ minors and the pediatricians who treat them when it comes to disclosing certain medical information to parents and guardians. Alex Keuroghlian (HMS/Mass General) is mentioned.\n\nThe $10 million quest to build a home health device inspired by ‘Star Trek’\nThe Washington Post\n\nThen there were two. A global competition to stimulate the innovation and integration of precision diagnostic technologies that will allow consumers to make their own medical diagnoses has been narrowed from 312 to two teams. Chung-Kang Peng (HMS/Beth Israel Deaconess) is the leader of one of the finalist teams. The winner will be announced in April.\n\nHarvard Medical School News Clips are not intended to provide an exhaustive review of all news sources. If you have any questions about our news clips, or would like to suggest an article for inclusion, please contact HMS_News_Clips@hmsharvard.edu.\n\nTo unsubscribe to this mailing list, send an e-mail to HMSNEWS QUAD FAC STAFF-unsubscribe-request@listserv.med.harvard.edu with \"Unsubscribe\" as the subject.\n\nWay HARVARD In the News\n\nCOMMUNICATIONS AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt_7658
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt
subject: Re: (no subject)
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets\n\nwith it thanks Jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt_7661
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 5:25:55 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I'm here until August —11 if your schedule changes.\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\nLatest China -\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-bromance-cools/\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt_7665
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie", "Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt_7675
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrashecd"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i hope the fasting is easy for you.. see you soon ?"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrashecd", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Want to know what you think .. is there a war coming in our region?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrashecd"], "timestamp": "May 11, 2019, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "WASHINGTON - Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is deriding President Donald Trump as foolish for trying to oust him. Kim Jong Un is testing Trump’s “love” — and his resolve — in the North Korea negotiations. And Iran’s leaders are finding new ways to threaten the U.S. and to defy the president’s “maximum pressure” campaign."}, {"sender": "Anas Alrashecd", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/11/2019 7:50:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well that is good to know bez i got concerned lately w"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt_7678
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt
subject: Re: new schedule
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/5/2017 12:32:54 AM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "Monday 4pm confirmed\n\nPres Trump departs Monday at 11am,. TFR in place until 11:30am Monday, which requires 24 hour notice for\nDeparture screening if departing during TFR hours.,\n\nTFR (Temporally Flight Restriction),\n\nOur departure time of 4:30 PM will not be impacted since TFR expires 11:30am Monday,,.\n\nFYI,\n\nFriday, Josh left voicemail indicating chevron should present purchase agreement by midday Monday. for your\nreview.,\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 4, 2017, at 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "monday 4pmtolsj, thurs morning pre clear to palm beach. sunday 12 new york . tues paris to 21 new\nyork. 24 santa fe. -march 1"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt_7679
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/26/2015 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/26/2015 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/26/2015 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think I am going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop on the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will have a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/26/2015 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time, I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/26/2015 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok, anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt_7680
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and gins in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [landon.thomas@nytimes.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die.\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:52:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "when we bet that marla maples was pregnnat , i olst and sent him 10,000 dollars of baby food. the hawain\ntropic gins all have photos he was the judge"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt_7682
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:08:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt_7683
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fethullah-gulen-tayyip-erdogan-foe-us-removal us 5bedf361e4b0510a1f2f16e9"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So fucking much going on"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "11/16/2018 11:52:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, 1 no one asking how the turks got that recording? 2 for you - steve says the republicans also want \n trump gone. he is now a liability"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028978.txt_7692
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028978.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative . ? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests. . mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos . ? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien, under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave, his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "maybe you can ask why bernie nussbaum got vince fosters letter quickly, that is a hillary problem. he would smile then you can ask his realtionsjipwith the elctricians unions and maralago . and out you go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:19:00 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What's the thumb nail on Nussbaum/foster?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025967.txt_7693
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025967.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:16:43 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "exactly"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/28/2016 4:14:35 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Are you around this Friday and weekend.\nlam - and leaving on Sunday at 5pm for Greece until August 15th/.\nIf you around would love to see you.\n\nJust a quick question - do you have any name for a potential LP for my fund. | am planning a final close end of September /October.\n\nPlease let me know"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt_7694
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Harry Fisch"], "timestamp": "11/9/2016 7:57:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "We should pay attention, too, to the many men whose lives are about to get significantly worse under Trump.\nImmigrant men. Gay men. Black men at risk of police violence. Men who rely on the Affordable Care Act for\ntheir health insurance. Men who reject traditional masculinity. And even the men and women who voted Trump\nto victory — white people who traded racial resentment for the kind of progressive change that would have\nimproved their lives, too. They surely think feminism has nothing to offer them compared with a promise to\nrestore them to their former position of unearned power; they are about to see how wrong they are.\n\ndear. I would like to confirm our recent and frankly very perplexing conversation. I had agreed to your\nproposal and that of Arthur Klein, . salary , sharings , responsbilities. ete. Arthur and I were clear and had\nagreed that expenses would be in the form of a stipend. What I think I heard from you is that you no longer can\nstand by the proposed agreement. . If that is true, please confirm to me in writing. Iam very surprised , and\nfind it difficult to understand"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033296.txt_7698
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033296.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 11:29:02 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/donald-trump-conversation-politics-dark-898465"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033309.txt_7701
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033309.txt
subject: Article on political trends
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:09:42 PM", "subject": "Article on political trends", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/16/secret-history-trumpism-donald-trump?CMP=share_btn_tw\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329.txt_7704
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If i want to go can u get me invited."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 26, 2018, at 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not likely. ive gotten 6 so far , and was told after 4 no more"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Too bad\n\nCan we lock in next year now.\n\nWill only revert if Chinese dynamics require."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2019, at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "back?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2019 7:01:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tmrw\n\nModestly interesting developments re dear Abby issue. Quite confused.\nTrump seems about same"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028866.txt_7705
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028866.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown,\njagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris (\ngates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome\nguest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate\nsummit , clinton ,security council, holy shit im on iii for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage\nall of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick\nof me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes ,1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in\nsurgery, and the\n\n\"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC\ntoday, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 7:44:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt_7708
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt
subject: Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 2:22:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/28/2015 5:59:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Sample, Elizabeth", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau MMIIM"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 28, 2015 5:24 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "\"Fitz Corr\"", "recipients": ["\"Fitz Corr\""], "timestamp": "March 27, 2011 11:11 AM EDT", "subject": "Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": "Do You Know This Guy?\nHe is Edward \"Ed\" Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937. And so who is\nEd Mezvinsky?\nWell, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's\n1st congressional district in the United States House of\nRepresentatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977.\nHe sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of\nRichard Nixon.\nHe was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to\npolitics and the nation and should be impeached.\nHe and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for\nmany years.\nEd Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue\nMargolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.\nIn 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in\nCongress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton's\ncontroversial tax package through the House of Representatives.\nIn March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31\nof 69 counts of federal criminal bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.\nEd Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people\nvia both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams.\nHe was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison.\nAfter serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in\nApril 2008 and remains on federal probation.\nTo this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his many\nvictims.\nAbout now you are saying, \"So what!\"\nWell, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.\nThat's right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law.\nNow Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a $10.5\nmillion NYC apartment.\nHas anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media?\nIf this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet, Sarah Palin's\ndaughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and\nevery detail would be reported over and over and over.\nAnd yet liberals say there are no double standards in political\nreporting.\nAnd people are already talking about Hillary as our next\nPresident!\nAnd then there is possibly Chelsea for president in our\nfuture!\nThe cycle never ends!\nLying and corruption seem to make Democrat\ncandidates more popular.\nWAKE UP AMERICA\nI have removed all previous addresses before sending this to you as well as sending it to you as a \"blind copy\". Please\nremove my address before forwarding."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030716.txt_7711
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030716.txt
subject: RE: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 8:32:08 AM", "subject": "RE: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "All good. Bannon with me"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023214.txt_7712
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023214.txt
subject: moving forward
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinclla (iii"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "I have mixed emotions about what transpired today. really, You saw first hand in nauseating detail what i have been saying to you for quite a while now. Joslins answers were totally incomprehensible. the charts he prepared unreadable. Brads defensive posture was at a minum very surprising . He and I have recently gotten along quite well , I thought . Neither Joslin or Brad understood a 180 million dollar number . no cash flow after weeks of requesting? odd. when you suggested that heathers behavior was emblematic of a sloppy office , brad said lets not talk about emblems??! bill pay , admittedly no change for the year. . plane not done. though it was the only thing 1 suggested doing first in july. . I sent youa list of 10 consultantts. brad said three, . 1 didnt want to push it. I was shocked that brad was opining on things he knows little or nothing about. tax issues. 1031. neg basis , note payoffs ( the same idea he said he had had from the beggining??!!) . answers re LBF holdings that can be corrected ( they cant) . valuations that have never been read. . When we met in your lobby he seems surprised that i was there. I dont know if he felt somewhat sandbagged. ..\n\nthe savings on the note payoff is aprrox 33 % of 1.8 billion. real money if you do phaidon which i see no reason not to . if later josh and ben want to buy it back with you or without you they can. 1 will walk you through the structure one on one. . the losses will offeset the calder gain as well as apollo gain.\n\nIm aware that seeing what you saw frustrated you. I felt badly for you.\n\nYou wanted a contingent deal. real value. etc. I will not of course hold you to your deal . . its silly. its not how 1 work or a reflection of our friendship. my proposal is as follows. I want away from your buisiness , but at the same time leaving you in good shape.  I think you should pay the 25m that you did not for this year. for next year its the same 40 m as always, paid 20 in jan and 20 in july, and then we are done. I will give you advice and counsel but new people will be running your operating machine. I will oversee all the work that needs to be done you and I will hire new people , and it will be self running. ( it was may in my house when you told brad it had been 5 months and you were getting fed up ) I will set up a parallel . office , somenoe like wendy dolman or her quality is paramount. two accountants two bookeepers and two office admins. . alan and zoe will handle trusts and grats. heatehr diana george will be incolved in art partnership. if you want brad, analysts etc. and kids to do investments I have little to add in that regard ,except to be able to account for things properly. I suggest that the kids must have skin in any deal.\n\nAlternatively , we can continue to focus on fun and let someone else do the things that you want done."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella iii! -"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: moving forward", "body": "I had forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. it was at the end of the meeting described below. . as you will recall , not once , not even a peep did alan suggest contemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD , from the begiining . my emails between alan and IJ that you can read , further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall the obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with my plan. ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032771.txt_7717
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032771.txt
subject: Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018, at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 17, 2018, at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "thought you and lisa might find amusing an aftershock of the me too movement. the revival of my fair\nlady has eliza dolittle walking out of the house when at the end Higgins says ok get my slippers instead of the\noriginal happy ever after."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/17/2018 6:31:49 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Adding Lisa. Scary to be a guy in today s World."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt_7720
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein

messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "haddadfm@aol.com"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names victims of Mr Epstein. and other young women who allege they were underage\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\nfurther has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\nPh:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032765.txt_7721
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032765.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:53:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Match made in heaven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will problably hire dershowitz,, no joke"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026160.txt_7722
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026160.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:23:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Saw Matt C with DTF at golf tournament I know why he was there"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029253.txt_7723
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029253.txt
subject: following up: WA poetry release
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video \nEducation. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen. \nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of \nyears ago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but \nwe would love the opportunity to turn it into something great. \nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/cObnlii xeo0654g/uWZ6KBVbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basic+Clip+for+Viewing.mov  \nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed \nconversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including: \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers \nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under \nway to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United \nStates and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television \nseries we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a \nseries of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers \nand for their students. \nLet us know if Woody Allen might be open to our sending another release form his way. Of course, if he's \ninterested in releasing the footage for only certain parts of our project, we're open to having a conversation \nabout that, too. \nThank you, and I hope to meet you soon. \nBest, Leah \nLeah Reis-Dennis \nPoetry in America"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["soon yi previn"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised-\nboth subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions.Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter \nproject with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["soon yi previn"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 5:59:54 PM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "thx"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt_7741
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt
subject: Re: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:15:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down.\n\nThen, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites.\n\nI spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself. What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head...\n\nWe were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. ‘This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably.\n\nI must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month,, you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.\n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033335.txt_7748
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033335.txt
subject: Trump meets Christie as some advisers urge Kushner for chief of staff: sources | Reuters
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 11:21:04 AM", "subject": "Trump meets Christie as some advisers urge Kushner for chief of staff: sources | Reuters", "body": "https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-kushner/some-trump-advisers-tell-him-to-consider-kushner-as-\nchief-of-staff-sources-idUSKBN1OC33A"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt_7749
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt
subject: Re: on another subject... gates and ed
messages:
  [{"sender": "roger schank <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gives about $200 million a year in elementary and secondary education grants\nand is pressing for some of the same changes that Obama wants, such as paying teachers based on student test\nscores."}, {"sender": "roger schank <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:49 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "they are sending their rep here on the second week of dec..\nwhy exactly? not be convinced they are wrong\ndo you remember chaunce the gardner from \" being there\" . dimitri\n\nI see I wont win this battle so I give up\n\nby the way... the right criticism of what he wrote is that he took a very long time to get there; by that definition\nof intelligence you are correct"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["roger schank <j>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 31 2009 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "and the \"there\" to which he arrived is trivial. and that there only after a long journey.. , re gates.. they have\nnow become frustrated , with the lack of success. bill is personally focused on online ed. he has spent the past\ncouple of months searching for decent courses, and found few ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt_7758
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "4/29/2017 6:57:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "new york fun your girlisinthe DR. i have no idea"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "2-3 weeks but Not sure how it will roll....supposed to be serious riots here may 1....lefties are pissed and trump said p.r.\ncan fuck iself....what’s with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "for how long. you can hop to my island with your friend if you like, just give me 24 hrs notice otherwsie i\nill be htre around the 19th"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "San juan...pick the jury monday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "where are you/ PR or new york"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt_7759
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt
subject: Fwd: Off the record trump
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg ee. Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:40:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Off the record trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "ii! <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": "<i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please\ncheck every false allegation with me before repeating to others.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt_7761
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt
subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant ____________________________ and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. t was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other men.\n\n5. was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduced had sex with him. Maxwell directed Maxwell directed to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where MIIM subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms to sit on Andrew's knee with Andrew groped both girls. Ms after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. Min. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew Ml= age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell ad President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026473.txt_7768
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026473.txt
subject:
  Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 12:58:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon hii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt_7769
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "??"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he's the real deal.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, any word on karyyna plans. . can you belive MBS sent me a TENT carpets and all."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:07:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Will call Japan tonite. A tent? Hmmm... I think that is code for 'I love you'. Or, maybe code for 'go pound sand'. Better check your KSA urban dictionary."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt_7770
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt
subject: Re: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2015 2:17:30 AM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J Jep", "recipients": ["G G", "Indyke, Darren K."], "timestamp": "Monday, September 21, 2015 at 22:08 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "I"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt_7779
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names_________________and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMsM further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:10:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt_7795
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley <j...>", "_Jes Staley <i"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 25 2010 12:51 PM", "subject": null, "body": "the more time you have to announce the better. Ive set up you and peter to meet in davos with darling. it would\nbe better afterwards to announce. I would go slowly, this can set the stage for lots to come. Obama really\n\nwants a fight. its crzy. \" They took bailout money and then\n\n\" the problems are all inherited , not of his\n\ndoing, he reached out a hand to help and was taken advantage of -, typical but problematic."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt_7804
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:24:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509.txt_7805
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509.txt
subject: Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum Healing, and Plato I Psychology Today
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/6/2018 11:32:09 AM", "subject": "Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum Healing, and Plato I Psychology Today", "body": "FYI\nhttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/201806/1unch-deepak-i-lsd-quantum-healing-and-plato?amp& twitter impression=true"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt_7806
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt
subject: The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Rib", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/28/2019 7:41:52 PM", "subject": "The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors", "body": "For ur info"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt_7815
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt
subject: ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More
messages:
  [{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "Active Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\n\nWednesday, July 27, 2011\n\nSome people do yoga on vacation; others go for the occasional run. This week we're thinking a little more... adventurously, from active escapes at Travaasa Hana in Maui to racecar driving in Baja and hiking Moab with the experts at Austin-Lehman Adventures. And after all that action, chill out with stays at the new Dream South Beach, the gorgeous Pavilions Phuket and other luxe resorts worldwide. (Image: The Pavilions Phuket - on sale Fri, July 31.)\n\nSales this week\n\nStarting Tuesday at Noon BST\n\nDream South Beach\nTravaasa Hana - Hawaii\nEsencia Estate - Riviera Maya\n\nStarting Tuesday at 8pm BST\n\nAVIA Hotel - Long Beach, CA\nHotel Las Palmas - Mexico\n\nStarting Wednesday at Noon BST\n\nLast-Minute London and NYC\n\nStarting Wednesday at 8pm BST\n\nFairmont Turnberry Isle Resort\n\nStarting Thursday at Noon BST\n\nSofitel - Philadelphia\n\nStarting Thursday at 8pm BST\n\nHotel Derek - Houston\nArches to Moab\nSpirit Ridge, British Columbia\n\nStarting Friday at Noon BST\n\nHotel Allegro - Chicago\n\nStarting Friday at 8pm BST\n\nVidago Palace - Portugal\nThe Manor On Golden Pond - NH\nCandia Maris Resort - Crete\n\nStarting Saturday at Noon BST\n\nRound Hill - Jamaica\nFairmont Royal Pavilion\nExperience Baja, Two Ways\nMaca Bana - Grenada\n\nStarting Sunday at Noon BST\n\nAlila Sothea - Cambodia\n\nStarting Sunday at 8pm BST\n\nThe Pavilions - Phuket\nSiam Kempinski Hotel Bangkok\nAnantara Bophut - Koh Samui\n\nStarting Monday at 8pm BST\n\nThe Madison - D.C.\nGrand Hyatt Atlanta\nHotel Bellevue - Washington\nThe Adolphus - Dallas"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.txt_7820
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look ata bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\nDz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers ._ centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xked.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes ,now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 1:04:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "god - so he does play , just not with fair dice"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt_7821
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also, \ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down \nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:02:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes On conference finish in 10 min"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt_7826
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe, fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "Nadia", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out., in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029211.txt_7827
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029211.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk /reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 11:48:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, (\ncouncil of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar\n). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you\nthink there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy\nshit im onl for next 30 minutes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt_7829
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "1/29/2011 12:36:51 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon\nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt_7834
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt
subject: Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JJEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 1:41:49 AM", "subject": "Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics", "body": "In case you missed it- Nick\nhttps: //www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/politics/sdny-subpoena-trump-inauguration-committee/index.htm"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031981.txt_7843
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031981.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI_am_also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt_7851
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["a E. a Kathy Ruemmler ee Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt_7855
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt
subject: FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments we submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday or Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24th February its worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr. Wade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\nMany thanks and best regards.\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "2016-02-26 13:04 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Great news, the piece was published in The Hill this morning-\nhttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/internationa1/270878-senegals-democratic-backslide\nWe can share this w Congress and State."}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake"], "timestamp": "Monday, February 29, 2016 6:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations!!! Can we share this with the press here?\nBest regards.\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details."}, {"sender": "abuulabass", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com.\nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards.\nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Bob Crowe", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt_7860
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Oh my goodness. I'm so sorry about these accusations. I wish there was a way to make them stop but glad that the truth surfaced. She sounds troubled for sure. Did you even know her? Hope your trip went well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ugh Hopefully this nonsense stops NOW!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029239.txt_7861
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029239.txt
subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMay I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a message just for you....\n\n-Lisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 3:31:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032956.txt_7864
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032956.txt
subject: see you at 9 am tomorw
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Pritzker"], "timestamp": "1/9/2017 6:56:22 PM", "subject": "see you at 9 am tomorw", "body": "http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-barrack-inauguration-20170109-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt_7865
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Heidi a little bit | don't think it will turn into romance | am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems\nintelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came\nthrough Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt_7866
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in\nthis market it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:30:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt_7867
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt
subject: Re: (no subject)
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets\n\nwith it thanks Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt_7874
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt
subject: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:39:39 PM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--\n\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy than they are of legal threats):\n\n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book;\n\n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine;\n\n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book,\n\nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe Patterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt_7875
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt
subject: Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "----- Original Message -----\nFrom: Kristin Andersen\nSent: 03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\nSubjct: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek\nPrivileged - Redacted\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM"}, {"sender": "Kristin Andersen", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST", "subject": "Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM\n\"Wolfe,\nAlexandra\n03/07/2011 02:09 PM\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\nRE:\nCC\nSubject\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\nI understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses.\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\nThank you,\nJay"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt_7889
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 10:26:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt_7894
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt
subject: crazy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "crazy", "body": "We are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, \nhowever inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that \nthe various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the \nmost important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many \nrespects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and \ninternational news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means \nthe global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts \nincluding US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, \nformer President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al \nGore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul \nMcCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the \nmost important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - - or this email address. \nMy very best wishes and my thanks! \nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "crazy", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376.txt_7899
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376.txt
subject: Re: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International Arbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish upbringing.\nLet me know.\nBest,\nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve,\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more specific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, but as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition to being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!\nBest,\nKathy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 4:36:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "good however in writing would be best."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt_7919
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt
subject: Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Fareed Zakaria GPS", "recipients": ["Fareed Zakaria GPS <r"], "timestamp": "June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4", "subject": "Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column.\n\nSteve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018\n\nROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn’t have to be that way, says\nStephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. “If the\nRepublicans continue on the path they are on,” Bannon told me Thursday, “they will lose 40 seats in the House and\nPresident Trump will be impeached.” He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it’s a strategy that\nTrump himself seems to instinctively get.\n\nBannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who\ntogether won half the vote in Italy’s recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition —\nmixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. “Europe is about a year ahead of the United\nStates. ... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here]... . You could begin to see the elements of\nBernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics.”\n(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.)\n\nThe Republican Party’s strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing\non the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. “You have to nationalize the\nelection,” he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of\ntaxes. “This is going to be an emotional [election] — you’re either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you’re\nwith Donald Trump. ... Trump’s second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year.”\n\nBannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. “Immigration is about\nnot just sovereignty, it’s about jobs.” He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters\nwho see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and\nHispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, “You’re not going to be able to take the Hispanic and\nblack community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools . . . to the great jobs in\nSilicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition . . . from East Asia and South Asia.”\n\nNow this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley\n\nhas much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled\nAsian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt_7924
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2018 2:56:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\nOnce again you are right.\nSee you soon,\nWith my friendship,\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266.txt_7925
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266.txt
subject: Fwd
messages:
  [{"sender": "pa ul krassner", "recipients": ["Nancy Cain"], "timestamp": "12/3/2018 4:59:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd", "body": "Importance: High \nBegin forwarded message: \nFrom: \"The Daily Beast: AM Cheat Sheet\" <emails@thedailybeast.com> \nSubject: Michelle Obama Halts Book Tour for Bush Funeral \nDate: December 3, 2018 at 4:21:57 AM PST \nTo: \nAlan \nDershowitz: \nYes, I Am \nStill Jeffrey \nEpstein's \nLawyer \n1 The linked \nimage cannot \nbe displayed. \nThe file may \nhave been \nmoved, \nrenamed, or \ndeleted. Verif... \nLawyer Alan Dershowitz has said that he still represents \nconvicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty to \nsoliciting underage sexual partners whom he initially \nrecruited as masseurs. Dershowitz, 80, told Axios that \nEpstein \"has called me a couple of times about legal issues, \nbecause I'm still technically his lawyer,\" adding, \"I haven't \nhad any social, or any other kind of contact [but] you never \nstop being a person's lawyer.\" Dershowitz told Axios that \nEpstein lent his family his Palm Beach, Florida, house and \nthat he received a \"therapeutic massage with an old old \nRussian\" there, but he'd had no idea \"anything improper had \neven taken place in that house.\" While he was allegedly \nraping teenage girls, Epstein cultivated relationships with a \nglobal elite: Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's plane, nicknamed \nthe \"Lolita Express,\" numerous times; Prince Andrew's ex-"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012628.txt_7928
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012628.txt
subject: RE: Proposed Letter to Special Master
messages:
  [{"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "10/05/2007 07:48 AM", "subject": "RE: Proposed Letter to Special Master", "body": "Good morning, Jay. We need to resolve the attorney issue today. It has been weeks since execution of the contract, and there is no need for further delay.\n\nAs far as the five attorney names that we will be providing, I propose Bert Ocariz, Katherine Ezell at Podhurst Orseck, Stuart Grossman, Ed Rogers, and Walter Cobath.\n\nIf you would like to use the same Special Master to resolve fees disputes as well as to handle the selection of the attorney, I would recommend that we use retired 11th Circuit Judge Joseph Hatchett instead of Judge Davis because of Judge Davis's health problems. (No one has contacted Judge Hatchett yet, but one of the District Judges in Miami mentioned him as a good choice.)\n\nI am available for a conference call between 9:00 and 10:00, and between 3:15 and 6:00. Please call me on my cell and let me know which of those times works best for you.\n\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Wed 10/3/2007 4:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Proposed Letter to Special Master", "body": "Marie - I, too, am interested in speed. But I really need to go over this and then discuss with Jeffrey. So please do not send this to any Special Master before we discuss the next steps.\n\nThanks -- Jay"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026362.txt_7931
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026362.txt
subject: Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "7/24/2015 8:47:39 PM", "subject": "Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today", "body": "yes, it requires a shot, its not a pill and so far no long term effects known"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2015 @ 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today", "body": "Have you heard of this colestrol"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt_7934
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific community.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\n\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference call on Skype.\n\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\n\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 10:15:52 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Until 3 p.m. EST.\nI will try to connect with you on Skype."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025350.txt_7935
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025350.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "Of crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LAS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly , by\nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033299.txt_7937
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033299.txt
subject:
  www.washingtonpost.com: In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post

messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry Josephson", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/26/2016 9:55:27 PM", "subject": "www.washingtonpost.com: In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post", "body": "What a difference a week makes!\n\nIn new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post\nwww.washingtonpost.com\n\nRead the full story\n\nBest,\nBarry J"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030528.txt_7938
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030528.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["PETER MANDELSON"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 11:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}, {"sender": "max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-  on-new-yorks-oddest- c oup le-j e ffrey- ep stein- and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-  ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \n\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: \nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity \nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I \nhadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a \npackage at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \n\nAnd Ghislaine? \n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her \nvulnerability. \n\nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, \nand moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't \ntend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't \nquite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has \nbeen open about. \n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. \nLook at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up \nfor all sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021425.txt_7940
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021425.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail. \nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it. \nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. \nI am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes. \nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). \nOur reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time. \nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement. \nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time. \nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish: \nIncident 1: \n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C. \n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was \"of age.\" \n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner. \n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying. \n• You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work. \n• In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne, despite her suggestion that you go down to dinner. \n• You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face. \n• You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her and trying to pull down the crotch of her tights. \n• She struggled to push you off her. \n• You said, \"When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you.\" \n• When you pulled out a condom, she got out from under you. She said \"I have to go,\" and rushed out of the room. \nIncident 2: \n• In an incident that occurred in fall of 2007 while you were a physics professor at Case Western Reserve University, a student tried to talk to you about her plans after graduation. You mentioned to her how tough it must be to have all the other physics majors asking her out on dates. \n• In a second incident in December of 2007, while you were still at Case Western, the same student visited your office to interview you for a student science journal. You closed the door behind her, and ignored the questions she had prepared. Then you made a casual comment about taking her out for dinner. \n• Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, without mentioning you by name. \"There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thought differently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left me upset for weeks afterward,\" she wrote. \n• She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you, based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and she did. \n• University investigators interviewed both you and the student. \n• On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university's associate vice president for student affairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told: \"This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university's sexual harassment policy. \n• The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she remained at Case. \n• The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics department before setting foot on the campus again. \n• The letter also stated, \"Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also his willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with students.\" \n• By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the month before. \n• \"The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,\" you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008. \nIncident 3: \n• A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous incident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her. \nIncident 4: \n• You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists Convention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she was attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic. \n• During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student and volunteers for Dawkins' foundation. \n• Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink. \n• You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a male friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go. \n• You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, Iowa, in April 2011. \n• You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the table. \n• She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She crossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away. \nIncident 5: \n• This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were informed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your female companion for sex in your cabin. \n• At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urged CFI's president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise, however. \nIncident 6: \n• During a visit to Melbourne, Australia, in November 2016, you were accused of sexual misconduct once again. \n• The incident happened at a dinner held at the Melbourne Zoo as part of the Australian Skeptics National Convention, where you were a featured speaker. \n• With conference delegates chatting over drinks, a woman asked you for a celebrity selfie. \n• As the woman held out her phone to take the picture, you reached over her shoulder and grabbed her right breast. \n• She immediately reacted, bodychecking you and spinning around. \"Don't do that,\" she said. \n• BuzzFeed News has seen the complaint made by another woman to ASU, ANU, and the New College of the Humanities in London, including the selfie, her face obscured to conceal her identity. It shows your hand in motion as a blur in front of her shoulder, apparently moving toward her chest. Two other eyewitnesses have confirmed the complainant's account of what happened. \n• In April 2017, the complainant described the incident on her blog. After hearing more about your reputation for inappropriate behavior from blog readers, she decided to file a complaint about the Nov. 2016 incident. \n• On July 16, she filed formal complaints with Arizona State University, and with the Australian National University in Canberra and the New College of the Humanities in London, where you have visiting appointments. \n• Both Arizona State and the Australian National University told her they would look into the matter. But neither university found against you. \n• \"Based on the material available to the University, we do not have sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations,\" Kiaran Kirk, dean of the College of Science at the Australian National University, wrote to her. \n• Erin Ellison, who heads Arizona State's Office of Equity & Inclusion, wrote to her explaining that an inquiry \"did not find a violation of university policy.\" \n• In October, Arizona State denied a request from BuzzFeed News for documents relating to complaints of sexual harassment against you. However, Cynthia Jewett, the university's senior associate general counsel, noted that two individuals, neither affiliated with the university, had complained about you. \"The University did not find either communication to state a credible allegation,\" Jewett wrote. \nMiscellaneous facts: \n• In 2008, you founded the Origins Project at Arizona State University in Tempe, a multidisciplinary effort to understand the origins of the universe, life, and social systems. You have led that effort ever since. \n• Thanks to best-selling books like The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe From Nothing, frequent essays in publications including the New Yorker and the New York Times, and the documentary you made with biologist Richard Dawkins, called The Unbelievers, you are celebrated as one of America's leading public intellectuals. \n• You served on the science policy committee for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and are a vocal critic of President Donald Trump. \n• You also make regular public appearances across the world, often at gatherings of skeptics and atheists. \n• At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheon with you and Dawkins. \n• Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told — So Far. \n• Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned \"Lawrence Krauss for President.\" \n• In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that religion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe. \n• You have stated that science provides answers to many of life's biggest questions, and can even fix great societal injustices. \n• Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the dearth of women and minorities in science. \"Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,\" you said. \"It's built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical evidence.\" \n• You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in 2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail. \n• Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has provided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently pledging $100,000 in 2014. \n• In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: \"As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" \n• In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: \"I remain skeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. .If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\" \n• You were made an honorary member of CFI's board of directors in December 2011. \n• A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post, published at around the same time, described incident #5. \n• The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault were \"potentially illegal.\" The second post was quickly taken down. \nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach you. \nThanks, \nPeter Aldhous"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft: \nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions. \nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down. \nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail, \nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to have been offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift well out out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you. \nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated.. In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in my note to me, along with the statement made in the complaint that \"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\" After the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows: \"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident. \n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner. \n- The conference attendee who took the selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016). \n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016). \nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact. \n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation.\" \n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour) \nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female graduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft: \nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions. \nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers falsely and inaccurately to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down. \nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail, \nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested in knowing what we could do, if necessary to encourage more women to go into physics, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her asking me to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, and on several occasions sh specifically asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I try to treat even students as respected colleagues if possible. I was shocked when I later learned of the complaint she was apparently asked to lodge to the University, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because, well after the dates you listed on which she was apparently offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments. Also, at a later AAAS conference, again in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift in our taxi well out out of our way in order to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University later informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed at that time to be called for, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request, both to respect her sensitivities and also because it was basically moot because I was not on campus. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the complaint from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you. \nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and morever the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complaint, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension of my position at ANU, until it was dismissed, outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, but it also stated \"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\" After the month-long investigation, during which I was told I was not to interact with anyone on campus (again moot because I was a hemisphere removed) the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows in the report, from which I quote: \"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident. \n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner. \n- The conference attendee who took the selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016). \n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016). \nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact. \n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation.\" \n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour) \nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and ethnicities. I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected. .so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "normally their strategy will be to take back your defense to the accusers. and attack each one. if they find you are right they will leave out. and only go with the conflicted. I think you should include short concise cover letter. that you would like published in it entirety. it can reference your attachment that you will put on your web site? . that goes into more details but in general , these are false. they were either investigated and found lacking or ignored. etc. often they throw out the near publishing date merely to get you to answer."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.txt_7944
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.txt
subject:
  Re: FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian

messages:
  [{"sender": "stanpottinger", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:31 PM", "subject": "Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit\n\nHope all is well. We're due for a catch-up one day soon, you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/21/2016 11:55:13 AM", "subject": "Re: FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian", "body": "Rape lawsuits against Donald Trump linked to former TV producer US news The Guardian  \nwww.theguardian.com ) US News ) Donald Trump \nJul 7, 2016 - Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been .... follows\na near-identical suit in California that made the same allegations against Trump and Epstein."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt_7946
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt
subject: Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:15:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "yes the good side is now he is free to have fun and a life . LIsa the wife is very happy as she did not want to live in two cities. tell you more when i see you"}, {"sender": "chud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL. Now he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033137.txt_7957
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033137.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you enjoying la? I liked your trump exaggerations not lies"}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can’t complain thus far..."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "11/7/2018 11:05:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dec visit me Caribbean"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030686.txt_7958
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030686.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-\nsmear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have\na bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised\nand shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not\ngoing to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's\nsake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--\nwhacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur\nSulzberger."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you and i are old news? :)."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 7:52:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Cross your fingers."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011280.txt_7966
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011280.txt
subject: Financials: buy XLF call spreads
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.\n\nThat said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of Trump's policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat call skew, \"appearing\" call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.\n\nBuy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium\n• Buy a 110% call\n• Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)\no Total premium is 2.6%\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%\n\nPost Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)\n• US Buyback Flows\n• Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials  sectors.\n\nGlobal Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector and are UW this sector in all regions.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)\n\nTrades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500\nIn the period since the US presidential election, the three top-performing S&P sectors and industry groups have all been finance-related (Banks, Financials, Diversified Financials)\nSource: Kensho Technologies\nThe Flow Show, Michael Hartnett, 11/18. Violent rotation: record equity ETF inflow, record financials inflow, biggest bond outflow in 3.5 yrs, record EM debt outflow."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ens, Amanda", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 09, 2016 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "lets try, 250k premium"}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kah"], "timestamp": "12/9/2016 4:03:45 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Thank you Jeffrey. Notional is $14,285,000. I'll be back with final trade details."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032839.txt_7971
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032839.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-emmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:53:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They r all jumping ship - its totally crazy - it's time to worry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026438.txt_7974
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026438.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas <1.111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about Ef Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because I was in your visitors list but somers and Margo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off I have never been in a big book before and I think it would have been great and they never even asked me I told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": "[empty]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful jf"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:21:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth of the claims. unvierstiy of virgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape accusation no penaltiy etc. mine is ripe with same"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026103.txt_7978
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026103.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [nsribis@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 12:35:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028494.txt_7979
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028494.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope today is fun for you."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017, at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "all next week"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok dylan will want to see you I always want to see you. Where are you having thanksgiving?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017, at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eva"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That means glenn check out his red hair!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "berries color for holiday"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017, at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He's such a snooze who else is down there?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david fizel. hanson. trump"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/23/2017 2:41:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have fun!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012614.txt_7997
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012614.txt
subject: RE: Meeting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/19/2007 11:51 AM AST", "subject": "Meeting", "body": "Barry is available Monday morning. Our most flexible West Palm Beach magistrate is on duty\non Monday, so, assuming we have signed documents by 1:30 or so, we should be able to get Mr.\nEpstein arraigned on Monday. I doubt that we will be able to get everything finished up here,\nget down to Miami, and try to find a Miami mag by close of business on Monday."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, September 19, 2007 11:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "We may want to meet monday and potentially continue to tues if necessary. Which mag is on duty?"}, {"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/19/2007 12:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Meeting", "body": "Judge Johnson has duty next week.\n\nJay — hate to have to be firm about this, but we need to wrap this up by Monday. I will not miss my\nindictment date when this has dragged on for several weeks already and then, if things fail apart, be left in\na less advantageous position than before the negotiations. I have had an 82-page pros memo and 53-page\nindictment sitting on the shelf since May to engage in these negotiations. There has to be an ending date,\nand that date is Monday."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031622.txt_8001
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031622.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:43:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed. and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market, more like custodian than investor."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029007.txt_8004
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029007.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016 8:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :). re regifting you just have to find people wth the same initials. . ithought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iasked , you told me it was ok that you had changed your plans to be able to make it. i will have someone check that you really mean what you say, ::))"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 12:44:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "just tried calling you. Call me back."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033266.txt_8005
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033266.txt
subject: wolf interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2018 5:03:27 PM", "subject": "wolf interview", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/05/people-say-trump-is-like-a-child-fire-and-fury-author-michael-wolff-\nsays.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031567.txt_8009
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031567.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff i"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy\nthat sold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff i", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff i"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff i", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff i"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In addition my art guyd said the painting wasn’t very good"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff ii", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:40:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You have an art guy?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030679.txt_8014
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030679.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 7:17:42 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Perfect, thanks so much!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "me,"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffery"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Hi Jeffery —\n\njust wanted to follow up on a couple of notes. I have been coordinating with Richard Kahn (copied), and I have sent along to him the invoice and donation letter. So, we are all set on that front.\n\nI also wanted to circle back around on Peggy's note below. Will you indeed be attending the ceremony this year? Also, you had indicated you would have three additional guests as well. If you are available to attend the ceremony, please let us know, as well as to provide us with the names of your three guests. (Security is extra tight this year, with honoring Al Gore and all, and everyone's names have to be on the list to attend).\n\nThanks so much, and look forward hearing more on this."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031215.txt_8031
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031215.txt
subject: Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #
messages:
  [{"sender": "behnbom@aol.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/19/2017 2:09:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHuge thanks for giving BBB another chance!!We have 200 quite fantastic young women\nincluding a minister, an ambassador-Lisa! a professor -your [!-a princess-Sofia! and\nthe other 196\n\nare doing pretty good as well...lots of young girls in Sweden now dream of joining\nBBB...we really build something\n\nunique and worthwhile!! Young dean at Stockholm School of Economics is an idiot to\nthrough it all out but\n\nnow its time to develop it smartly! | will be doing a famous Summer radio program in a few\nweeks in Sweden,\n\n1 million listeners...among other things, | will talk about the girls..(and my blind date long\nago with a Donald\n\nTrump..ha ha!) Anyway, please see details for the money transaction below - Edyta is my\nbanker ann a super\n\nperson! - | am leaving tomorrow night if anything? Also, if you send me a cell phone\nnumber, | can start sending\n\nyou photos from BBB, much easier than e-mail.\n\nTACK sweetheart for continuing believing in BBB! Kram BE\n\nBarbro C. Ehnbom\nChairman, Swedish-American Life Science Summit"}, {"sender": "Edyta.Wynberg", "recipients": ["behnbom"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 19, 2017 9:05 am", "subject": "SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Hej Barbro!\n\nBeneficiary name: BBB AB\n\nBeneficiarys bank: SEB ( Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken)\n106 40 Stockholm\n\nBeneficiarys bank SWIFT address/BIC: ESSESESS"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029092.txt_8032
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029092.txt
subject: Re: Greetings from Japan
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey, \nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end. \n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big \nbitcoiner) as FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. \nAnd of course, Thiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear \nwhere your head is at on this matter. \n- Last week, I presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most \ninteresting thing I came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to \nbe spent only in the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An \nexample of something that could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you \nagree to donate your money to charity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be \nable to release your funds from that agreement until they use their funds not for charity. \n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on \nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect \nto the technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt \nthat even putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a \nhedge fund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically \nunder-valued. I made sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it \nwill be interesting to see the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front. \nBest, \nJeremy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeremy Rubin"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "Feb 12th."}, {"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "Are you around here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeremy Rubin"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "where in tokyo are you lecturing? no im in new york"}, {"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/4/2017 1:53:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "At digital garage"}]


