# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt_13939
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4, 2011 4:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031195.txt_13940
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031195.txt
subject:
  Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/27/2016 5:02:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": ""}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["as"], "timestamp": "January 27, 2016 at 12:01:01 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023341.txt_13942
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023341.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "this was sent four months ago, nothing has changed\n\nsent oct 15. before big transaction.\n\nOffice, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax\nexperience. .castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a\nbill ) eva goes. outsource as much as possible... bookkeeping systems built from scratch, airplane\nrestructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really\nwant these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts\nactivity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA re thinks . household and construction\n\narchitects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family\noffice. . decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years... insurance. operations. airplane ,\netc. . artfoundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line\nbanking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ). airplane certificate, redone jet aviation\nredo. . _— paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but Im encouraged and glad for\nyou. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before\nhim. what would you like me to tell Barry?\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work that i\noutlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it again if you\nlike ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very same thing for a\nlong time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning there was Eileen and\nTom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was chosen from a pool of 2\npeople. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes i personally augmented his comp in order to get\nhim ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax, | He complained for over a year , re his\ndirection by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was not a surprise after months and moths of\nwarnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with john and joe. He ran amok, and as i told\nyou he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you told him that he works for you and not for\nme and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that 1 gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up\n\nquestions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _) but\nsomehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . —_ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the task, you\nbellowed. that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by trying to protect\nyou from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his work. it then turns out\nthat he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and continued to make a really\ndangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes, was also my doing , though email after email said , I take no\nresponsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your response was that was my opinion\nwas only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan you told me he was gone. however he\ntoo is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the foreign\nfunds repatriation plan that i had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions to make re\nmy time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit much time and\nmake any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced mess.\n\nThat being said, the tasks at hand are the following."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030643.txt_13944
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030643.txt
subject: Re: Ri did see this coming...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on.... And wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible... Will you have a cabinet position? How are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 7:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "How's that? Which team you pulling for?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "And just had a great time with Joi. You still in Paris?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Nov 13, 2016, at 9:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "trump tower"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 3:19:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Perfect Co-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031549.txt_13956
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031549.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": null, "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": null, "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Acela...type it or wait till I get to a quiet place"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch. He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 8:42:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When?...(did you ask him after or before he got his grand jury subpoena?)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023355.txt_13964
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023355.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spincll iii i Zi"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM", "subject": null, "body": "miami ), commitments dividends, BRH TRA, shareholder agreements, bank loan\nagreements. wills, construction, , contracts planning permits etc..employ rules. checking account\nreconciliations, crediti cards. jewelry , cost basis ,( art stock etc.) foundations regs , brokerage accts, old\nstock certificates. stock options,( environmental solutions still not done !). estate tax calcualtion firedrill, (\nnote ,basis etc ) low basis , step ups , however with no accounting system, no reveiw of boat expenses plane\nexpenses etc. . many outside counsel with litle or no coordination.\n\nPaul Weisss , Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse , Reich, withers bergman, Empire, , akin gump,\nbbd seidman, Wendy , Apollo in house .\n\nlumber, knowledge universe, ennvironmental, solutions 12 mii in stock, . on and on\n\nthe priority list that you asked me to prepare for brad and you in dec , unfortunatlleyso far , little change\n\nie no accounting system that ties, no, brokerage accounts though strongly suggested , jpm db, gs, april of\n2014 . IT antiquated\n\ndagastino hired , no inut from me, julie, temps, paralegals miriam . etc.\n\nstill need new accounting system - on line banking . staff hires. ( seprate from samantha two years out of\nschool ). audit system, . ?? john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? . i strongly suggest workers at the highest level of\ncompetence. two senior accountants. not managers workers who will get into the weeds. partn expertise, ,\nreplace ava, get heather help. a new person legal , new IT,system and person, way way overdue, new\nreceptionist, bill opener, ability to oeversee\n\nin house, boat plane review household ( 12million ) review, filings- partnerhip accounting,- familitarity with\ngrats, trusts etc . audit system put in place. that should be the easy part. then strategy to deal with: As new\nfacts on the ground develop , phaidon debra, children meeetings, ? stock sale sale of art, , apt( large gain ),\n1031 trade in , plane depreciation, boat sale. construction , brad will oversee brokerage and investment, ?? pe.\nreal es, . publishing, grats, tra, brh ( death). foundation , museum, tax proejctions cash flow projections,\ncooridnation with tax from apollo. etc\n\n1.I believe Ihave heard you , but i wanted to make certain that I have understood\n\nThough after much discussion ,- much! you were adamant that i receive my fee only at the very END of my\nwork, oct 15, this was a long discussion but you felt very strongly at the time . you now feel that as it was\na very large sum of money . some of my time this year should be spent on your recent concept of \"after care\n\".- and that after care should be for free . I have continued to pay others as well.\n\nI have asked and you have previously said you would lay out for me what you thought was encompassed by\nthe concept. that was end of january Training brad?? who was your choice . not mine ,by a long shot. only\nbrought on in january? ? hundreds of hours spent . eileen debrief? 2. boat. plane\nhousehold ex[penses. personal review? , trying to create accurate ledgers of capital expenses . so to minimize\nfuture gain.? 3. phaidon - review from head to toe? though we agreed many times in the past this was not\nmy responsbility, 4. overseeing the opening of trading accts. proposed and sent over first docs in april of\n14. .5. art partnership.? we agreed though the draft was sent in septl4 . and still not done though little\ndifferent from first draft. .6 picasso contract? 7 art sale 1031 8 airplane review? 9. IT system\nimplementation. ? tra brh sec gaming comm, foerign filing , tax, disclosure. fondation returns. ? planning for\n16? notsure . 10. insurane review with josh? stock sale prep. ? filing ?\n\nIam available by phone. you mentioned my travel schedule ----last yea,r I canceled three European trips and\ntwo to seatle , none to my benefit.\n\nI have been consistant , I dont have any new proposal , do you? though i am\" complicated\" , I have no\nintention of trying to convince you of value, its silly ,\n\nOOOOOOOOOCOOOCOOCOOOO _ i think if Ihave correctly deciphered your sophisticated code - should\nrepresent -drool"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt_13966
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt
subject: Re: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my\nboyhood boyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on\nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be\nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there .\nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\n\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget .\nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance ,\nno actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or\ndavid brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it\nfor less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As\ndoes Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for\ntempleton, so thank you .\n\nT really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the\nsame birthday! May I have his email?\n\nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep\nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "What time????"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "thurs 1"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2014 1:47:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "See you at 1:00..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028927.txt_13972
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028927.txt
subject: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sullivan, John <john.sullivan@washingtonpost.com>", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI’m John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I’ve been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein’s Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan\n\nJohn Sullivan\nReporter\n\n1150 15 Street NW\nWashington DC 20071"}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:54 PM", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016690.txt_13975
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016690.txt
subject: Re: ARCOM
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirk Blouin", "recipients": ["John Page", "Police Code Enforcement"], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ARCOM", "body": "JP,\nHere is a copy of the minutes from the April CEB hearing. Each month thereafter the case was postponed\nbecause we were aware that it was being brought to ARCOM. Now that this matter has been resolved\nwith ARCOM we will proceed with a code enforcement case until the property is in compliance (meaning\nthey plant the shrubbery and hedges approved by the Town).\nSgt. Krauel or Rob Walton will be available on July 23rd as I will be attending a conference.\nH. Case # 08-2484, 515 N. County Road, Trump Properties, LLC\nViolation of Chapter 18, Section 18-205 of the Town of Palm Beach Code of\nOrdinances, the Architectural Commission may attach conditions to any approval it grants\n(Declaration of Use Agreement).\nLead Code Enforcement Walton presented the facts of the case and said the previous\nowner of the property, Abe Gosman, had been granted approval by the Architectural\nCommission to do some remodeling. One of the conditions of this approval was that the\nhedge along the front of the property be maintained in the condition it was in at the time the\napproval was granted. This agreement was a binding agreement, which passes on to any\nsubsequent property owner. The agreement was made January 31, 1990. The subsequent\nbuyer of this property was Mr. Trump, Trump Properties, LLC and some remodeling work\nwas done, removing the previous hedge. A new hedge was planted to replace the original\nhedge and that one has now been removed. This is a violation of the agreement. A letter was\nreceived from Mr. Royce, representing Mr. Trump, asking for a postponement of today’s\nhearing. The Town does not feel this matter should be postponed.\nMr. Randolph summarized the letter from Mr. Royce which indicated the ficus\nhedge keeps dying and they want to replace it with something different. They plan on hiring a\nlandscape architect to go before the next Architectural Commission meeting to get approval to\ninstall a hedge in an attempt to meet the conditions of the declaration of use agreement. Mr.\nRandolph said he had discussions with Mr. Royce and Mr. Walton and Mr. Royce was told the\nTown could not recommend a postponement and the recommendation would be that they are\nfound in violation, assessed the $150.00 in administrative costs and be given until June 18th,\nwhich is the day before the June Code Enforcement Board meeting, to comply. This would\ngive them the opportunity to appear before the Architectural Commission to see if they can get\napproval to re-plant a hedge. The hedge has to be installed to the height which existed at the\ntime of the agreement which Mr. Randolph said he believed was twenty-two (22) feet. Mr.\nRandolph said Mr. Royce was not present today because he had a planned vacation.\nMOTION BY MR. FRIED TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON-\nCOMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF $150.00 AND GIVE THEM\nUNTIL JUNE 18, 2008 TO COMPLY.\nSECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN\nMOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY"}, {"sender": "John Page/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Kirk Blouin/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "06/26/2008 09:00 AM", "subject": "ARCOM", "body": "Kirk: We had our June monthly ARCOM meeting yesterday. You likely know that ARCOM is working\nwith Mr. Trump to re-install a hedge on his North County Road property. I believe this case is now\npending in front of Code Enforcement. In May, ARCOM approved a plan to replace the former hedge\nwith silver buttonwood shrubbery, which would additionally be back-planted with silver buttonwood\ntrees....the overall effect would be an eventual 20' high screen. The shrubs have been planted, but\nyesterday attorney Ray Royce asked for postponing the trees until the end of the Hurricane season.\nARCOM said NO and directed the attorney and landscaper to get the trees in ASAP. Also, more\nshrubbery was required at the main entry (north side) to match the newly installed hedge on the south\nside.\nAs the meeting was ending, the Commissioners asked for one of two things. They asked that either 1) a\nquick written report from Code Enforcement be made available to them at their next meeting on July 23\n(9:00 a.m.) about the enforcement status of the case, or 2) that someone from Code Enforcement attend\ntheir meeting to provide a verbal status report. Their patience is wearing thin with the whole hedge issue,\nand it has them naturally curious about what is happening with their counterparts on Code Enforcement.\nWould you or the appropriate representative from Code Enforcement be available on July 23? That\nwould be my preference because follow-up questions almost always pop up. If not, can you provide me\nwith a brief summary of your enforcement history and pending status? Thanks, JP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033260.txt_13982
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033260.txt
subject: Trump 'made comment about p**sy years before tape' | Daily Mail Online
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/30/2017 10:28:42 AM", "subject": "Trump 'made comment about p**sy years before tape' | Daily Mail Online", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5131173/Trump-comment-p-sy-years-tape.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026609.txt_13984
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026609.txt
subject: Fwd: January 23, 2015
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffreyepsteinorg@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 24 2015 05:22 AM", "subject": "Fwd: January 23, 2015", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": ["jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM", "subject": "January 23, 2015", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nFurther to emails of January 21, I crossed an image of a rare 17th Century Marble Bust of Roman Emperor Vitellius\nyou purchased from me during the second half of the 90's.\n\nI recalled upon many occasions you visiting Bennison, Pimlico Road and being extremely respectful and courteous,\nas Miss Maxwell was on each occasion.\n\nFrom recent media reports about you and our Prince Andrew, I do not believe you, Miss Maxwell and Prince Andrew\nwould undermine your conduct the way reports are suggesting.\n\nI feel for you all and hope this episode clears so you can concentrate on your professional activities that do positive\nthings for our countries.\n\nYou may have heard a report an interesting report conducted by a genius Lawyer Michael Shrimpton - Michael\nShrimpton youtube - Exposes Ted Heath (and others)\n\nThe report is shocking and is not a hair-line what you are wrongly accused of (based upon our many meetings).\n\nFurther David Dicke reports on the USA former President George W. Bush Senior which again is shocking,\nunbelievable, unacceptable...\n\nMr Michael Shrimpton & Mr David Dicke are worth watching if you haven't yet crossed their researching of public\nfigures that have (literally by reports) got away with murder.\n\nPlease find attached an image of Vitellius, pair of 19th Century Medici Lions (that are perfect for one of your estates),\nemperor Vespasian and a pair of Piranesi Engravings for your consideration.\n\nDo not hesitate to contact me should you require more details.\nWarm regards,\nYours sincerely,\n\nMark Green.\n\nCel.\n\nBEST WISHES TO THE THREE OF YOU!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025514.txt_14004
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025514.txt
subject: Re: poetry and science
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2014 7:15:11 PM", "subject": "Re: poetry and science", "body": "okay. you let me know when you can talk. \nAnd I hadn't added to this list neuroscience--where Emily Dickinson has it nailed-- and maybe this would be the \nright poem for your group. Notice how many metaphors are operating simultaneously here \nThe Brain, within its Groove \nRuns evenly--and true--\nBut let a Splinter swerve--\n'Twere easier for You--\nTo put a Current back--\nWhen Floods have slit the Hills--\nAnd scooped a Turnpike for Themselves--\nAnd trodden out the Mills--\nI get to New York Thursday am or perhaps tomorrow night...haven't decided quite yet which. Always \nprefer face to face if you have time \nlisa"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: poetry and science", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nApropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was \ninterested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV \non a broad range of topics. \n500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin \nimmediately, Jan 1.. I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a \nsession on metaphor at the edges of fields. \nINote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology, \nzoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David \nMalan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post \nproduction. \nI am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics \nLisa \nPoetry in America for Teachers II: The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky \nCombining study of poetry with study of science, environment and the visual arts. Materials include \nhundreds archival images and live footage shot in \nCape Cod, Nantucket, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, Jamaica, Aspen, California, Papua New Guinea \nincluding oceans, ponds, marshes, birds, fish mountains, coral reefs, forests as well in some major collections \n(HMNH etc) \nwith author Michael Pollan on Joel Barlow (and colonial agriculture) \nwith economist Lawrence Summers on Oliver Wendell Holmes, (and technology and \"one hoss shay\" \ndepreciation) \nwith Harvard students at the Nantucket Whaling Museum and with , John Steele, editor of the science \nmagazine, Nautlilus, on Lowell and Melville \nwith Vice President Al Gore on Ralph Waldo Emerson ,and, with eco-critic Lawrence Buell (with footage \ntaped on the Concord River as well as in Harvard's Houghton Rare Book Library ) \nwith a dozen Harvard students and Boston area school teachers on Emily Dickinson's \"skies\" (shot at Emily \nDickinson's home in Amherst Massachusetts) and with ED 's original mss. at Harvard University \nwith Jane Pickering In Harvard's Museum of Natural History on Marianne Moore, zoology and science \nmuseums \nwith Martin Espada and other New Yorkers (footage shot on the East River) on Whitman and urban \ngreenspace and with Susan Howe on Stevens and parks \nwith Richard Dawkins on Frost, evolution and probability and with Jay Parini, Frost biographer, in Frost's \ncabin on \"The Road not Taken\". \nwith Director of the College Board (and writer of the Common Core Standards) , David Coleman on Robert \nFrost's \"Birches\" (filmed in a birch grove) \nwith Peter Galison on Einstein and Modernism (taped in the Harvard Scientific Instruments collection in the \nHarvard Science Center) and with author Walter Isaacson on Einstein and Modernism (Fogg Museum) \nwith Ray Dalio on Marianne Moore( in Rajah Ampat with Conservation International); and with Jane \nPickering, Head of the Harvard Natural History Museum, ( filmed in the Harvard Museum of Natural History) \nwith Stefan Weiss, Walt Mossberg and David Malan on coding, computer language and L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E \npoetry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033506.txt_14010
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033506.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\n\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\n\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know.\n\nJess"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033512.txt_14019
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033512.txt
subject: FW: epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg ME « Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jackie Perczek CS | Derren Indyxc"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 4:57:42 PM", "subject": "FW: epstein", "body": "fyi"}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:57 PM", "subject": "epstein", "body": "Dear MM: we have no comment on the trump story. We are finalizing our pleading regarding the plaintiff’s position on remedies. I intend to hold off commenting until we file it. After that I will be free to comment on the pleading which will address your question. Roy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031213.txt_14028
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031213.txt
subject: Re: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/21/2012 9:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "She is the one! Now SALSS 4 days.. will get back to you next week... \nKram BE."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}, {"sender": "Barbro C Ehnbom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep \nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this \nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\nBut he is a bit busy I gather! \nAnyway, hope got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail \nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda \nand she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement? \nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..? \nLet me know what you think! \nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend Goldsamt! \nFirst prize for perseverance! \nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful! \nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS! \nKRAM \nBE"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026254.txt_14033
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026254.txt
subject:
  Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 12:48:36 PM", "subject": "Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437\n\nImportance: High"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031803.txt_14035
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031803.txt
subject:
  Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims

messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["DAVID SCHOEN"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 9:57:14 AM", "subject": "Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "no worry how are you"}, {"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 2:21 AM", "subject": "Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today.\n\nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by wealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to testify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil lawsuit against the registered sex offender.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-civil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims\n\nExplore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033274.txt_14039
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033274.txt
subject: Alert - trump im palm
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 2:19:27 PM", "subject": "Alert - trump im palm", "body": "February 16, 2018 9:00 AM : trump im palm"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028728.txt_14049
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028728.txt
subject: prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/11/2013 5:45:09 PM", "subject": "prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /", "body": "The Wall Street Journal\n\nThe Ayatollah Always Says No\n\nEditorial\n\nFebruary 8, 2013 -The Farsi word for \"no\" is na h, which is easy enough\nto remember. Maybe even Joe Biden won't forget it the next time the U.S.\ntries to reach out diplomatically to Iran.\n\nWe're speaking of the Administration's latest effort to come to terms with\nTehran over its nuclear programs, which Mr. Biden made last weekend at\nthe Munich Security Conference. The U.S. offer of direct bilateral talks,\nhe said, \"stands, but it must be real and tangible.\" Iranian foreign minister\nAli Akbar Salehi, who was also at the conference though he refused to\nmeet with U.S. officials, called Mr. Biden's comments \"a step forward.\"\n\nMr. Salehi's remark set the usual hearts aflutter that Iran is finally serious\nabout a deal. But the optimism was brief. On Thursday, Iran's Supreme\nLeader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei flatly rejected direct talks with the U.S.\n\"The U.S. is pointing a gun at Iran and wants us to talk to them,\" he said.\n\"Direct talks will not solve any problems.\"\n\nThis isn't the first time Mr. Khamenei has played chaste Daphne to\nPresident Obama's infatuated Apollo. Just after becoming President in\n2009, Mr. Obama sent the Ayatollah two private letters and delivered a\nconciliatory speech for the Persian new year of Nowruz. Mr. Khamenei's\nanswer: \"They chant the slogan of change but no change is seen in\npractice.\" He told a crowd chanting \"death to America\" that \"if a hand is\nstretched covered with a velvet glove but it is cast iron inside, that makes\nno sense.\"\n\nThat was in March 2009. In October of that year the U.S. and its allies\ntentatively worked out a deal with Iranian negotiators to move some of"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt_14052
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:36:16 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:24 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031156.txt_14060
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031156.txt
subject: On today's financial market developments
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "8/4/2011 11:41:48 PM", "subject": "On today's financial market developments", "body": "This is a little unorthodox, but here is the text of an internal note that I just sent to our integrated Private Bank client coverage teams a few moments ago. Mary thought it would be a good idea to share this with our clients given the events of the day.\n\n“Here is what I plan to say at our Aspen Insights conference tomorrow about today’s events. The last two weeks have been a severe setback for financial markets and the global recovery.\n\n[1] Today, Italian equity markets sold off sharply and were eventually shut down after the ECB (for now) rejected being the buyer of last resort for Italian government bonds, as the markets were hoping. The Bundesbank apparently has objections to the idea. This is a problem: Italy has issued around as much public debt as Germany, but is a considerably smaller country with almost twice the debt load as a percentage of its GDP. Absent a decision by Germany to move to Federalism or a lot more debt monetization by the ECB, the European Monetary Union (as it is currently configured) could be facing its final stretch. Today’s reported move by Italian regulators to seize documents at Moody’s regarding declines in Italian bank stocks is an indication of the pressure the system is under, and the possible search for scapegoats. I don’t think you will find a firm that has written more often and more direly about the structural inconsistencies of the EMU than we have (I have a 2-year bibliography of what we said and when, if anyone wants it). The “Sick Men of Europe” paper from February 2010 and “Don Quixote Thanksgiving” from November 2010 go into the greatest detail on why. Our concerns sky-rocketed upon Greece’s financial disclosures in November 2009, after which we took portfolio decisions to back that up, purging exposures to the GIPSI countries from our credit, government bond and equity portfolios. Since early 2010, our underweight positions in Europe represent the largest regional underweights we have ever held.\n\n[2] Will there be another recession in the US? Our friend Marty Feldstein at Harvard puts the odds at 50-50. Sell side and buy side economists missed last month’s US economic rollover by a country mile, so I am not sure how much weight to put in their current forecasts. Most summarily dismissed our concerns that the recovery earlier this year had elements of a stimulus-driven mirage. Bridgewater Associates was the only firm we spoke to that consistently highlighted the broader process of household deleveraging; and cautioned that when stimulus faded, so would the US economy, given the weakness in household income. Their insights have been invaluable to us in terms of not stepping into this and taking too much risk prematurely during the three market swoons this year. Our central scenario for the US in 2012 is not another recession, but low growth in the 2.0% range, which is enough of a problem given the low job creation that entails. Note that the CBO assumes growth rates of 3.0% to 3.6% over the next few years in their analyses of future US federal debt levels.\n\n[3] Do not blame today’s events on the debt ceiling debate, US politicians or European regulators. If we get to the point where economic and profit fundamentals in a given market or region are not sustainable on their own, then we should be underweight that region (as in Europe). Owning an asset class under the assumption that there will always be a “Lord of the Flies” type rescue from Central Banks and Treasuries is very risky, and historically, fraught with failure. I remember similar logic in the summer of 1998, when the accepted mantra was that the US would bail out Russia and Boris Yeltsin, since President Clinton would not want to see a nuclear power like Russia slide back into Soviet rule, or anarchy (that view turned out to be wrong). Anyone market-weight European risk out of the expectation that “Trichet and Merkel will fix surely it” is taking a binary risk that impossible to handicap. Similarly, we should not start buying anything just because we think Qe3 is coming in the US (in the form of securities purchases, a permanently controlled long bond, etc).\n\n[4] When we began this year, I made the following decision: we would risk underperforming if there was a strong equity rally, out of concerns about the macroeconomic landscape (weakness in the West, inflation in the East). As a result, we have held less equity exposure than usual for a period of high margins, low P/E multiples and strong earnings. Instead, we’ve held larger exposures to investment grade and high yield credit, and hedge funds. Over the last couple of years, our hedge funds (long-short funds with low net positions, macro hedge funds, distressed credit) have"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029344.txt_14067
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029344.txt
subject: Post-Death Actions of Foundation Affecting Estate Tax Value
messages:
  [{"sender": "Halperin, Alan S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/2/2014 10:51:32 AM", "subject": "Post-Death Actions of Foundation Affecting Estate Tax Value", "body": "I thought of you when I read this article. Was this your idea? Alan\n\nWALL STREET\n\nTexas Billionaire's Heirs Save Some Money on\nTaxes\n\nJun 27, 2014 1:26 PM EDT\nBy Matt Levine\n\ne a\n° A\nEvery so often I hear a story that I find rather wonderful, and that I then pass along to you, just in case you and I\nshare a similar sense of wonder. Here is one of those stories. It's about death and taxes.\n\nThe story begins on Dec. 28 of last year, when a Dallas billionaire named Harold Simmons died at the age of\n82. He left the bulk of his $8 billion fortune to two of his daughters. Much of that fortune was in \"Contran\nCorp., a closely held entity that holds majority stakes in four publicly traded companies: Valhi Inc., NL\nIndustries Inc., Kronos Worldwide Inc. and Comp X International Inc.\"\n\nThe biggest chunk of the estate was Contran's 93.8 percent stake in Valhi, which was 318,156,746 shares. !\nValhi's stock closed on Dec. 27, 2013, at $14.91 per share, making that stake worth about $4.7 billion as of\nSimmons's death. Another 2,481,900 Valhi shares (0.7 percent, $37 million) were held by the Harold Simmons\nFoundation, a charity controlled by Simmons's daughters.’ Other family members owned about 2.8 million\nshares ($41 million). Public shareholders owned about 15.7 million shares ($234 million).*\n\nHere are two facts about the federal estate tax:\n\ne The estate tax rate for 2013 and 2014 is 40 percent of the value of the estate.*\n\ne The executor can choose to determine the value of the estate either on the date of death, or on the\n\"alternate valuation date,\" which is the date six months after the date of death.°\n\nFor Harold Simmons's estate, that alternate valuation date is tomorrow -- six months from his death. Today is\nthe last trading day before that valuation. How's Valhi done in the last six months?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033125.txt_14069
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033125.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 11:29:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how unfair yes, it was written by financial illiterates. . referencing \" todays dollars? with no back up. IRS looked at all. .they ignored taxes paid along the way.. they didnt understand the rules.. I m not a supporter but this is nothing but a hit job."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031624.txt_14076
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031624.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to?\n\nI would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London.\n\nAny thoughts?\n\nPS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market/ the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,\n\nsocial media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\n\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:48:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt_14079
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt
subject: Re: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": "iis <>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get It."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "i <r >", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don’t need to be seen. I can not have press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don’t have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can’t just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM’s) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then.\n\nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for this."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032575.txt_14084
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032575.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:15:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he just did() it seems i will be in new york from sep 14 until 20 .. if you happen to be there let me know it will be great to see you.. if not, i will have a bag dilevered to your house with some souvenirs from kuwaitc14"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030512.txt_14092
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030512.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "Iam writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\n\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which 1s at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - J - or this email address.\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:18 AM", "subject": "FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 4:42:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032803.txt_14094
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032803.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 12:46:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks Melanie\n\nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish Melanie was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the 25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.\n\nBe well."}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal\n\nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke - Donald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pirie introduced US ...\n\nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month.\n\nI think you would both enjoy spending time together -\n\nThanks to you both for always supporting me.\n\nYou are both copied.\n\nMelanie"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032213.txt_14097
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032213.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:39:13 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025946.txt_14111
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025946.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "put one"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at a time .\n\nin storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal\n\nobjects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/11/2016 1:08:58 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold.\n\nB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031618.txt_14112
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031618.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "5/16/2016 3:41:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, 16 May 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am kind of shocked that our reporters did not contact you re the Trump/women story. Seems to me\n\nhe got off rather lightly.\n\nHow are you doing?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030506.txt_14115
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030506.txt
subject: Re: Quick question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["iin"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 02:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "He couldn't for a few months , too hot\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "iin", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc,\nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the\ngovernment in general, etc?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028781.txt_14118
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028781.txt
subject: FW: World Bank Nominee
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2012 7:10:58 PM", "subject": "FW: World Bank Nominee", "body": "The Atlantic Home  \nFriday, March 23, 2012 \n• Politics \nMassoud Hayoun - Massoud Hayoun writes for and produces The Atlantic's International channel. \nHow Jim Yong Kim, Obama's World Bank Pick, \nChanged Global Health Aid \nBy Massoud Hayoun \nMar 23 2012, 2:04 PM ET \nThe international public health work that made Kim, now the president's nominee for World Bank head, such a \nrespected figure. \nPresident Obama introduces Jim Yong Kim as his nominee to be the next president of the World Bank /Reuters \nPresident Obama announced today that he will nominate Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to head \nthe World Bank. Although Kim is a physician by training, officials have observed that Kim's role as a key \nplayer in global health and development, notably with his role in the organization Partners in Health (PIH), \nmakes him a key candidate to change the attitudes of developing-world nations. \nThe following excerpts from Tracy Kidder's Mountains Beyond Mountains, a biography of anthropologist and \nphysician Paul Farmer, detail Kim's bold efforts to combat international HIV and tuberculosis epidemics with \nPIH: \nSome months after the official founding of PIH, [co-founder] Paul Farmer expanded the group, adding a fellow \nHarvard anthropology and medical student, a Korean American named Jim Yong Kim... Farmer offered what \nfor Jim Kim was a convincing vision of the new organization. The reality was less impressive -- a charity with a \nboard of advisers and no hired staff... \nThey talked about issues such as political correctness, which Jim Kim defined as follows: \"It's a very well-\ncrafted tool to distract us. A very self-centered activity. Clean up your own vocabulary so you can show \neverybody you have the social capital of having been in circles where these things are talked about on a regular \nbasis.\" (What was an example of political correctness? Some academic types would say to Jim and Paul, \"Why \ndo you call your patients poor people? They don't call themselves poor people.\" Jim would reply: \"Okay, how \nabout soon-dead people?\") \nThey talked about the insignificance of \"cultural barriers\" when it came to the Haitian peasant's acceptance of \nmodern Western medicine: \"There's nothing like a cure for a disease to change people's cultural values\"... \nBy now Peru was taxing PIH's resources severely. On average, the drugs to treat just one patient cost between \nfifteen and twenty thousand dollars. And the number of patients kept growing. Already there were about fifty \nCarabayllanos in treatment. Their average age was twenty-nine. They were students, unemployed youths, \nhousewives, street vendors, bus drivers, health workers. The actual numbers seemed small, but those fifty MDR \n[a form of tuberculosis that does not respond to standard treatment] cases represented about 10 percent of all \nactive cases of TB in the slum, about ten times more than might have been expected. No telling how many \nothers they had been infecting as they'd traveled around Lima, coughing. No telling either how many people in \nother parts of the city already had MDR, but [there were] reports of hundreds in other neighborhoods. In \nCarabayllo itself, the Socios workers found entire families sick and dying with what turned out to be genetically \nrelated strains of the disease--a phenomenon common enough that the health workers gave it a name, familias \ntebeceanas, tuberculosis families. \nKim's organization confronted Peru's MDR-form tuberculosis epidemic with what some have called unorthodox \npractices -- borrowing and cajoling its way into medicine for its patients. \nHoward Hiatt, a friend of Jim Yong Kim's and a former dean at the Harvard School of Public Health, said he \nwas concerned about how PIH was getting medicine to combat the epidemic: \n\"Sure enough. Paul and Jim would stop at the [Harvard-affiliated] Brigham pharmacy before they left for Peru \nand fill their briefcases with drugs. They had sweet-talked various people into letting them walk away with the \ndrugs.\" [Hiatt] was amused, all in all. \"That's their Robin Hood attitude.\" In fact, they'd only borrowed the \ndrugs... \nThen one day the president of the Brigham stopped Hiatt in a corridor. \"Your friends Farmer and Kim are in \ntrouble with me. They owe this hospital ninety-two thousand dollars.\" Hiatt looked into the matter. \"Sure \nenough. Paul and Jim would stop at the Brigham pharmacy before they left for Peru and fill their briefcases with \ndrugs. They had sweet-talked various people into letting them walk away with the drugs.\" He was amused, all \nin all. \"That's their Robin Hood attitude.\" \nTo many seasoned managers of public health projects, what Farmer and Kim were doing would have looked \nquite reckless--like a stunt, as some would later insinuate. They didn't have a guaranteed supply of drugs, only \nthe determination to obtain the drugs and the charm to get away with borrowing. They were borrowing their \nlaboratory services, too, from Massachusetts. They lacked proper institutional support. The weight of expert \nopinion stood against them. Their organization was small and it had other projects, in Haiti and Boston and \nelsewhere, and Peru put a strain on everyone. Jim had to travel to Carabayllo at least once a month. Farmer had \nto go there slightly more often. \nKim's audacious 'Robin Hood attitude' won him and PIH acclaim for their role in changing global health and \ndevelopment. \nIn June 2002 ... the WHO adopted new prescriptions for dealing with MDR-TB, virtually the same as PIH had \nused in Carabayllo. For Jim Kim this marked the end of a long campaign. \"The world changed yesterday,\" he \nwrote from Geneva to all of PIH. The prices of second-line antibiotics continued to decline, and the drugs now \nflowed fairly smoothly through the Green Light Committee to, among other places, Peru, where about 1,000 \nchronic patients were either cured or in treatment. About 250 were receiving the drugs in Tomsk, and, largely \nbecause of the efforts of WHO, the Russian Ministry of Health had finally agreed to the terms of the World \nBank's TB loan--150 million dollars to begin to fight the epidemic throughout the country. \nThe twin pandemics of AIDS and tuberculosis raged on, of course, magnifying each other, in Africa and Asia, \nEastern Europe and Latin America. Mathematical models predicted widening global catastrophe--100 million \nHIV infections in the world by the year 2010. Some prominent voices, some in the U.S. government, still \nargued that AIDS could not be treated in desperately impoverished places. But this view seemed to be fading. \nThe prices of antiretrovirals were falling, even more dramatically than the prices of second-line TB drugs. \nThis was thanks to a growing worldwide campaign for treating AIDS wherever it occurred. Jim Kim had often \nsaid that the world's response to AIDS and TB would define the moral standing of his generation. In 2003, a \nnew director general took over at WHO, and he asked Jim to serve as his senior adviser. Meanwhile, the \nexample of Zanmi Lasante [PIH's Haiti-based project] was growing, and Cange had become a favorite \ndestination for global health policy makers and American politicians."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt_14122
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andres", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 8:09:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI was prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I’m so disgusted by the outrage over\n“grab them by the pussy” that I may give him my sympathy vote.\n\nI’m sure Bill C said things, too.\n\nAndres"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026308.txt_14124
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026308.txt
subject: Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly | TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly | TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/400188-exclusive-bannon-blasts-con-artist-kochs-lame-duck-ryan-diminished"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 08:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly | TheHill", "body": "loved , not donors - but marks"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly | TheHill", "body": "Buried lede"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly | TheHill", "body": "If we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy\ncampaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign\nexpertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of\n2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-\ngamed.\n\nPart and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The\nraft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the\nelectorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in\npolitical views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must\nincorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe\n\nSilicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort.\n\nI am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates\ninto a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable,\nmurky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to\n\nnominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028847.txt_14125
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028847.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 2:34:04 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Flying to LA. Will try to call when I land.11AM Pacific or so."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 7:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "a if you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama’s response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated\na 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader’s hidden wealth.\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\nfortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029581.txt_14128
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029581.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 117 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 5:28:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow(s}\nMichael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/676040070"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029500.txt_14129
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029500.txt
subject: Peter Theil / Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/10/2016 3:44:04 PM", "subject": "Peter Theil / Trump", "body": "http://hill.cm/Op8MRzu"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026999.txt_14130
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026999.txt
subject: LIVE! Melinda Gates on How Empowering Women Changes the World
messages:
  [{"sender": "How To Academy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/27/2019 8:29:59 AM", "subject": "LIVE! Melinda Gates on How Empowering Women Changes the World", "body": "LIVE! Melinda Gates on How Empowering Women Changes the World\n\nView this email in your browser\n\n17th July 2019\n\n|\nq\n\nHow Empowering Women Changes the World\n\nBuy Tickets"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031787.txt_14132
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031787.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Rit iii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JJEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 2:14:44 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Mueller statement at 1lam will be interesting - I think it's because of Michael wolff's new book and the\nreference to a draft indictment- it probably will be helpful to DIT - talk after"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030499.txt_14134
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030499.txt
subject: any fun?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "any fun?", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "boris", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: any fun?", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt_14135
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt
subject: Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/21/2018 7:26:45 AM", "subject": "Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics", "body": "Does the statement will help?\nhttps: //ww.cnn.com/2018/11/20/politics/top-republicans-slam-trump-saudi-arabia-khashoggi/index.htm\nRegards,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt_14140
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt
subject: Re: TSA
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:53:26 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski [likely larry@somewhere.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "TSA called me. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm.\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm?\n\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure?\n\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\n\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023235.txt_14141
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023235.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Lets start. I am aware that you are currently angry at the world. . me, karp wechsler. even yourself, all willing absorbers of the current high heat. (though you ,calling me ,Debra , did take away some of the sting ) Iam sorry to see you this way.\n\nemblematic ; I was asked to opine on whether to hire castrucci. an hour after I gave a preliminary yes.\n\n. I called you then texted you that i had thought more about it and changed my mind. The next day brad called and asked for my vote. I told him ,in no uncertain terms itisano , I categorically voteno. I called you . youcame to see me. I said it was a bad idea. you said you were going to do it anyway , I said and followed up in writing IT IS A MISTAKE . and added Please don't come back to me with anything suggesting otherwise , you and I should be clear I think it is wrong . A very strong NO. you of course can hire whomever you like.\n\nglad to see you are personally on the mend - as well as the fence. -- As you know i dread money discussions with you-- however -we should address the issue of what you would like to do moving forward. re- do family office, accounting trusts , estate and apollo agreements . Along with your \"payment \"last year we agreed . no further obligations on each side. yes, i continued to moan. I realize that though Ive done quite a lot this year already _, it is not your responsibility. . As you often like to remind me- you've paid a great deal of money to date. that being said - If you want my involvement moving foward, Isuggest you pay my regular | fee of 40 m. 20 now . 20 on completion or as per the invoice issues at the end of last year pay 30 all at once. -\n\nTo help out .im keenly aware of your current cash position. so I will consider an in-kind payment - real estate ( Miami ), ,art , financing of my new plane (allows you to spread over years or of course the preferred cash. Get rid of Castrucci,it is over a year since the same story of findign the right guy at the top. youentire accounting needs to be re done. , office downsized, reporting re done. meetings to recitify, categlorize , the various docs re appollo , rowen , suydam, alan etc. Brad can direct investment guys, ( hopefully) my people will be in your office for a few months . reorganizing IF you decide not to pay I fully understand, as Im sure you will re my no longer spending any serious time on these things. Of course re any non financial issues , I am always there for you and will continue to be the best friend I can be.\n\nSteve jobs said that everyday he woke up , and asked himself , if he knew he was going to die tomorow , would he do the same thing that he had planned for the day- he wanted to check that he was doing things that he really wanted to. after three days of getting back an answer of no, he would change what he was going to do. . he also did not believe in LONG term plans. I dont think either one of us will figure out what we want to do long term so my thinking is that we should try to have fun everyday, and welcome serendipity.\n\nI think another trust and estate lawyer should be brought in to deal with the issues of how not to allow your family to get screwed by your partners on death. Alan, for years told me that paul weiss had drawn the docs so no issue but when recently pushed by my new fire drill he asked akin to draft .?! PLease ask brad about why he keeps talking about flow. I dont know what he means, its so silly .. this is only about money control and protection .\n\nI am leaving monday night now. free to speak in the afternoon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.txt_14146
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.txt
subject:
  Re: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Moshe Hoffman"], "timestamp": "5/3/2016 6:37:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "i think you might want to consider the distribution of these things , not the binary report of the individual"}, {"sender": "Moshe Hoffman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "Hi Jeff, \nThanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman \nand Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out \nof it eventually as well. Means a lot to me. \nMartin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of \nsome of my own and pass them on to you. \nIn case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's \nwork, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you \nare interested. \n-Moshe \n1) Where do our moral and political views come from?  \nThe bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through \nreason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does \ndrive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of \ncommission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery \nhas been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)? \nAnd across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)? \nMore generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all \nmen are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by \nan amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do \nthe bidding of their cynical designers? \n2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music? \nSome tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile. \nAnd maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many \naspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like \nthese things? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play \nin what we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally \nspecific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its \ninfluence? \n3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar \nstructure they have?  \nWe have one vote per person, but everyone knows dollars can buy more votes, and voters in small states are \nbetter represented than those in large states. Whose interests are being served and why theirs? Many \neconomists and political scientists have thought about \"optimal institutions.\" And much comparative and \nhistorical work has been done. But there isn't really a good unified theory of how these evolve, what \ncharacteristics are likely to emerge, and in what ways they are or are not optimal. \n4) Is there a fundamental theory of human societies that's analogous to Darwin's theory in biology?  \nCan that framework be as well supported by evidence and as simple as natural selection in biology, that will \nlikewise explain the interesting things humans do, like, and believe, and the institutions we construct? \nEvolutionary psychologists think this doesn't require a new theory, just an investigation of the mind that \nbiologically evolved on the Savannah. Others like Dawkins have suggested that we are best understood as \nmachines infested by viruses of the mind which themselves evolve to take advantage of our evolved \npsychology. Anthropologists treat culture as just random inputs. Social psychologists document the funny \nquirks of our behavior without explaining where they come from. And economists assume people optimize \ngiven their tastes and beliefs but take those as given. Is one of these the right theory, if not is there a more \ncompelling theory out there? What will it look like? How will we find it? How will we know we have found it, \nwhen we have? \n5) How can we fix the perverse incentives in academia?  \nResearchers get hired and promoted for publishing in top journals. Journal publication is determined by editors \nand referees. The best way to publish is to make sure your allies are the referees, cite their work, and don't step \non their toes, and to convince the editor you are famous enough and your work is flashy enough that it will be \nwell cited and get covered by the nytimes. None of this requires much attention be paid to truth, insight, or \noriginally. \nArguably, this is why the social sciences are such a mess. Few bother to incorporate evidence or arguments \nfrom outsiders (e.g., social psychologists don't consult historians, economists barely consult social \npsychologists). Few bother to question the fundamental assumptions driving their field that make no sense and \ngo unchecked (e.g., anthropologists treat culture as random inputs). And many researchers end up spending \ntheir whole careers developing and propagating theories that are completely uninteresting to outsiders, or \nobviously fallacious to anyone not steeped in their literature. \nIt is ridiculous that we're still using a system derived from the Society of Letters of the 1500s. Perhaps it's time \nfor something more like Wikipedia, where information gets aggregated and contributors are incentivizes by \ntheir reputation as competent editors to integrate information from across disciplines? Or something like \nReddit, where quality research is recognized by upvotes that aggregate the opinion of thousands from diverse \nfields? Or a certification system of sorts, where papers are certified as having done their statistics right or \nhaving integrated what's known from certain fields, or not citing irrelevant papers for political reasons? \nWhatever the solution is, social scientists and engineers who work on this problem will have orders of \nmagnitude more impact on science than scientists doing primary research in our archaic system."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032398.txt_14147
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032398.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2016, at 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Eduardo, I ve gotten your name from sulltan suleiman in Dubai. He and I are great friends. I have two islands in the us virgin islands and want to build a great home Sultan thought you might be the right fit . can speak directly at any time , the islands you can see on google earth or great and little st james thanks jeffrey"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nI'm available tomorrow, at any time after 10:00 Am (Dubai time) ( notice that Thailand its three hours ahead so for me it's 13:00 Pm) \nMy cell number in Thailand is: \n(If possible) please let me know by email (at least) 1/2 an hour before calling me so I can be alert to the (phone) ring \nRegards"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2016, at 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in new york so does early eyeing work"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Oh, In that case I'm available right now, for the next two hours , that this work for you ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2016, at 7:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in ten minutes. . ???"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2016, at 8:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york throught asia tokyo hong kong etc. then i will fly you with me to st thomas and return"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2016, at 10:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trying now New York Via Hong Kong or Tokyo ? I'll now by tomorrow Morning \nRegards"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, what Day, is better for you to meet in New York? It's the holidays and issue ? (New Year) , for us it's fine but let us know, so can arrange the date and schedule"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, Many options through Asia, destination New York , please let me know the dates, also it'll be good to have an engeenier at the site to ask some technical (local) questions \nWith this plus your briefing, would be enough to asses the islands and through the two days of (blue sky Ideas) get your vision in a rough format \nRegards"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2016, at 5:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in caribean until the 2nd. and then fly to new york. anytime is good. I dont cellebrate normal holidays. . every day is a holiday.. othewise I will be in new york the 20th-22 and then fly down to island again, so if the 22 works we could exchange some ideas and info prior and you can hit the ground running."}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, need to be in Dubai on January 15, 2017. Then, We can fly to New York and meet you there on the 20 th. \nIf you happen to have a survey on the Islands available? It will be very helpful to us (to get familiar with the site) ? If not, we can google earth the Island \nLooking forward to meet you \nRegards"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["edrobles erobles"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2016, at 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "will send great for schedule. . 20th is both my birthday and inauguration of trump. a nice time for a new project"}, {"sender": "edrobles erobles", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Thanu Cnx"], "timestamp": "12/29/2016 11:35:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sounds like a plan!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt_14150
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:21:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer", "body": "Yes\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive 1News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it „ we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to\ncome to europe?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article216997195.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt_14157
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt
subject:
  Re: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/a-putin-friendly-oligarchs-top-us-executive-donated-285000-to-trump/

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2018, at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/d-e-shaw-fired-fund-manager-michalow-for-gross-violations", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/d-e-shaw-fired-fund-manager-michalow-for-gross-violations STAY AWAY!"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/a-putin-friendly-oligarchs-top-us-executive-donated-285000-to-trump/", "body": "I am now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 10:33:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/a-putin-friendly-oligarchs-top-us-executive-donated-285000-to-trump/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt_14158
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt
subject: A few thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 7:55:54 AM", "subject": "A few thoughts", "body": "1) I saw SB in London yesterday and he seemed especially paranoid about any reporters seeing me with him. \nMy guess is that he is working hard on his relationship with Trump who he sees as newly ascendent and being \nseen with me might queer that. \n2) He went on Hannity last night and will be on Piers Morgan tomorrow and that seemed with an eye toward an \naudience of one. \n3) He was having a meeting yesterday with the French right wingers, including Le Pen's husband, about \nrefinancing the National Front Party because apparently a good part of their money comes from Russia. Two \nthoughts here, these guys seemed like idiots, pure Ruritania, and Bannon, surrounded by his own thuggish-\nlooking security people and whacky-bloggers advisors, thrives precisely because the world of populism is so \nunprofessional (if not farcical). \nmore later..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023221.txt_14159
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023221.txt
subject: agenda for tomorrrow
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "1 did the paul weiss bill get paid ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today important\n\n10m paid today to gratitude america, a 501 c 3, willl make last year complete. 20 million paid today ftc . 10 million july 15 5 million sept 30. , 5 million jan 1 for all of 16. tax savings paid at 37 percent . of net. savings. 50 million credit. net. so 150 million free. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed.\n\nas areflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? ))::\n\nin the beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to eat the apple from the knowledge tree) that was it. ada was at the bank but reviewing docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush ( abel and cain) books as they were mystersiously called was being kept soley by eileen, with little or no input ,correction or advice from tom. herarely if ever asked questions. expenses ie airplane was done in house apollo. (1031 exchange blown etc) at this time as I recall you got quite annoyed, and agressive and initiated the\" talking out of the both sides of your mouth \" tiddy, when i suggested that the level of their competence left much to be desired. ( ralph lerner's came later ) .response - eileen ran the desk, tom is a partner, ralph wrote the book etc\n\nre tax there was almost no oversight of income, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise etc . IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, valuations ( many )tax filings- disclosures, etc. re grats trusts defect trusts, llcs corps , trustees , partnerships. foreign corps. 100 bank accounts. gift taxes, , loans, notes. payables. expenses. . , insurance.( life , art, split dollar), cashflows, operating biz, , investments, contingent liabilitiites.( funds , miami ) , commitments dividends, BRH TRA, shareholder agreements, bank loan agreements. wills, construction, , contracts planning permits etc..employ rules. checking account reconciliations, crediti cards. jewelry , cost basis ,( art stock etc.) foundations regs , brokerage accts, old stock certificates. stock options,( environmental solutions still not done !). estate tax calcualtion firedrill, ( note ,basis etc ) low basis , step ups , however withno accounting system, no reveiw of boat expenses plane expenses etc. . many outside counsel with litle or no coordination. Paul Weisss , Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse , Reich, withers bergman, Empire, , akin gump, bbd seidman, Wendy , Apollo in house . lumber, knowledge universe, ennvironmental, solutions 12 mii in stock, . on and on the priority list that you asked me to prepare for brad and you in dec , unfortunatlleyso far , little change ie no accounting system that ties, no, brokerage accounts though strongly suggested , jpm db, gs, april of 2014 . IT antiquated dagastino hired , no inut from me, julie, temps, paralegals miriam . etc.\n\nstill need new accounting system - on line banking . staff hires. ( seprate from samantha two years out of school ). audit system, . ?? john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? . i strongly suggest workers at the highest level of competence. two senior accountants. not managers workers who will get into the weeds. partn expertise, , replace ava, get heather help. a new person legal , new IT,system and person, way way overdue, new receptionist, bill opener, ability to oeversee\n\nin house, boat plane review household ( 12million ) review, filings- partnerhip accounting,- familitarity with grats, trusts etc . audit system put in place. that should be the easy part. then strategy to deal with :\n\nAs new facts on the ground develop , phaidon debra, children meeetings, ? stock sale sale of art, , apt( large gain ), 1031 trade in , plane depreciation, boat sale. construction , brad will oversee brokerage and"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014695.txt_14161
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014695.txt
subject: Meet with our Global Head of Commodities - Monday at 10:15am at One Bryant Park
messages:
  [{"sender": "Amanda Ens", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "1/27/2017 8:03:49 PM", "subject": "Meet with our Global Head of Commodities - Monday at 10:15am at One Bryant Park", "body": "Please let me know if you're interested in joining a small group meeting with our head of Global Commodities. Apologies for the short notice but they just created this based on client request. \n• Monday, January 30 at 10:15am at One Bryant Park (42nd St & 6th Ave), Room 5F \nFrancisco Blanch is a managing director and head of Global Commodities and Derivatives Research. Regular Research publications include: The Global Energy Weekly, Commodity Portfolio Monthly and Quantitative Investment Strategies Monthly. Research produced by the Commodities, Asset Allocation, and Global Derivatives teams has been recognized by Institutional Investor, Extel, Greenwich, Bloomberg, or Energy Risk, among others. Previously he was Head of Global Asset Allocation Research. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, Blanch was an energy economist focusing on global oil & gas in the commodity research group at Goldman Sachs & Co. and consulted for the European Commission and other public and private organizations. Blanch has a masters degree in public administration from Harvard University and a doctorate in economics from Complutense University of Madrid. \nKey topics of discussion: \n1 — OPEC / Saudi Policy - OPEC agreed to cut production by 1.2mb/d, along with 600kb/d from non-OPEC producers. Francisco believes Saudi's key objective will be to push the oil forward curve into backwardation to 1)lower global refinery margins 2) lower prices for forward sellers and prevent capex spending 3) reduce downside oil price risks. Francisco believes it is in OPEC's best interest to comply with the stated cuts, and thins Saudi remains under significant pressure to either achieve higher oil prices, or inevitably de-peg the Riyal. \n2 - Oil fundamentals - OPEC's cut has significant implications for supply/demand balances and throws the global market into a meaningful deficit for 2017. We estimate the global market will be in a 560kb/d deficit throughout 2017. US Shale output remains a headwind for a rebound in global balances and will vary with price. Given our $59/bbl 2017 outlook for WTI, Francisco believes shale will reverse its current trend before rebounding sequentially by 660kb/d between 2Q17 and 4Q17. \n3 — US Energy Policy / Trump Administration — Francisco views the likelihood for Trump's administration to implement a border adjustment tax to be extremely low, but recognizes that if a tax was imposed, it would have profound implications for EM demand and the WTI/Br arb. The appointment of key cabinet members Rex Tillerson, Rick Perry, and Scott Pruitt pose significant implications for the US energy sector. \n4 — Commodity Macro — Forward inflation expectations around the world have jumped sharply since Trump's victory. So far, rising inflation and steeper yield curves have neutralized the strong dollar, pushing commodities higher. We believe the recent breakdown in USD/Oil correlation since OPEC/Fed can persist so long as inflation expectations remain supported. However, a toxic mix of much faster-than-anticipated US interest rate hikes, a much stronger USD, and a trade war with China pose risks."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt_14162
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 6:40:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Opinions"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026755.txt_14167
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026755.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/5/2017 10:18:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Rachel Wolfson, Contributor Digital marketing consultant, writer and fitness buff. I enjoy writing about women\nin tech, innovating startups and everything in-between.\n\nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s\nProposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts\n\n°\n°\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, once said,\n\n“The good thing about science is that it’s true, whether or not you believe in it.”\n\nNeil deGrasse Tyson’s quote from The Colbert Report distinguishes the difference between opinion and fact.\nScience, as a base, is always true. Yet, it is interpretation that imparts human error. In other words, while\nscience is a universal truth, not everyone believes in the importance of science.\n\nConsider President Trump’s 2018 budget request. Many of these call for massive cuts in spending on scientific\nresearch, medical research, disease prevention programs and more. If these requests are met, the National\nCancer Institute would face a $1 billion cut compared to its 2017 budget. The National Heart, Lung and Blood\nInstitute could see a $575 million cut, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases would see a\nreduction of $838 million. The administration would cut the overall National Institutes of Health budget from\n$31.8 billion to $26 billion.\n\nThe National Science Foundation, which gives $7 billion a year in grants to universities and research institutes,\nis not specifically mentioned in the budget. However, unspecified “other agencies” are in line for a 9.8 percent\nbudget cut.\n\nSince Trump became president, the official White House website also deleted all mentions of climate from the\nsite — all but one — the promise to eliminate the “harmful and unnecessary” Climate Action Plan.\n\nFollowing these actions, scientists and other employees of the EPA and USDA were told not to speak to the\npublic about climate change or other scientific concerns that should be addressed.\n\nPrivate Donations To Fund Science\n\nDue to Trump’s anti-science policies and budget cuts, scientists are looking towards private donors for funding.\nPhilanthropic dollars have now come to play an important role in scientific progress.\n\nThe successful American financier and philanthropist, Jeffery Epstein, is well known for supporting science; he\nis currently taking action to help a number of scientists thrive during the “Trump Era.”\n\nNone of this is new for Jeffery, though. Jeffery’s funding for science dates back to the year 2000, when he\nfounded the Jeffery Epstein VI foundation to support cutting-edge science and science education around the\nworld. The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation has supported many leading scientists including Stephen Hawkings,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt_14181
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2018 12:27:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "i think we have divergent views on Trump and trade for obvious reasons\n\nthe best economists say all-out trade war will cost the WORLD 2-3% of its GDP\nthis can hardly help the stock market\n\nbut the \"perturbations\" are meat for you—if you can see what to buy and sell ahead of time—or very quickly—\nin response to the latest tariffs you can beat the system\n\nTIA-CRF can not\n\nin good times, it does better than average—here it does distinctly worse—each hit is taken hard, each recovery\nis feeble—precisely because it does not change its portfolio or only slowly"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023209.txt_14194
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023209.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella i", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Yesterday", "subject": null, "body": "Yesterday, I again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. I speak to brad to get flavor) and you and I will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing the things that I don't have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,a desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. , planes. boats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800 page tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers, home mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead of less that 3 million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that I have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights . I wrote it to you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised as one of your concerns , as arule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I fear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what I would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those things that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you wouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer many of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art partnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning that you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 I wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong inclination is not to be involved at all . It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many that will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people involved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my involvement ) I am also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the complexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyone would report to him. Eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long shot my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind my own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer be transmitted to reflect status stated by others )\n\nWith no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to think through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you might find very costly, very ! (however many structures available some risk sharing, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but would require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure what role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Rich your controller stays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy Gregory, I would suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be taken into consideration."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt_14203
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pe"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:22:33 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with flight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:"}, {"sender": "Lawrance Visoski", "recipients": ["Mr. Tarek El Sayed"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Mr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727.1 personally thought it was a great match for your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department were as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr Trump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also been involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for our Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 —- 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport category aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring countries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of Boeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and also flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft when it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\n\nSincerely,\n\nLawrance Visoski"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt_14208
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 3:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So...a couple of times a year somebody can cull the Internet and write an article about you that recycles every other article. That’s a reason to try to create a new story. But, on the other hand, by not offering new news the old seems just ho-hum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016218.txt_14212
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016218.txt
subject: AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 1:51:01 AM", "subject": "AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration", "body": "https://www.cnbe.com/2018/05/08/att-confirms-it-paid-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-insights-on-administration.html\n\nAT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer\nMichael Cohen for 'insights' on\n\nadministration\n11:57 AM ET Fri, 4 May 2018 | 01:18\n\nGetty Images\n\nMichael Cohen, longtime personal lawyer and confidante for President Donald Trump,\narrives at the United States District Court Southern District of New York on April 26, 2018\nin New York City.\n\nTelecommunications giant AT&T said Tuesday night that it had paid President Donald\nTrump's lawyer Michael Cohen for \"insights\" about the Trump administration.\n\nAT&T's admission came after a lawyer for porn star Stormy Daniels claimed the company,\ndrug giant Novartis and a Russian oligarch had all made payments to Cohen's shell\ncompany."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026320.txt_14216
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026320.txt
subject: Trump @ War
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 8:25:40 PM", "subject": "Trump @ War", "body": "https://app.frame.io/presentations/a87092af-cb6a-473b-924 1-582c03dbb906"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022665.txt_14220
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022665.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HE is the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 10, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now good?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 4:43:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Need 15"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt_14224
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt
subject: Watching
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 2:03:17 AM", "subject": "Watching", "body": "Chomsky's requiem for the American Dream. Fascinating. Brilliant guy.\n\nSeparately, trump is not a force for a civil society. EVERY taxi/Uber driver I've encountered is FOR him.\nI really don't get it.\n\nHow are you?\nXo\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028884.txt_14236
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028884.txt
subject: Re: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 5:09:58 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Okay. Shall I attach budget? Edit the above and send it. Send it to whom? Lisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:53 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift.\n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money.\n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking--Modernism) and including three episodes of tv.\n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBB), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more.\n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs.\n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250.\n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar_) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt_14242
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We have a ticket for to go back to Paris on Nov 24. What date shall I change this to since she will be traveling with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:52:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "27"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029224.txt_14243
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029224.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad press in fulll swing. she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he\nwas sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 4, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting.... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi to"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 12:19:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Kabuki Sec royals money"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt_14244
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of people"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:15:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt_14245
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you can , send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks. . as you can see trump\nnow said he wants a deal with iran. nuts"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadich <iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free\ninformation."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On 24 Jul 2018, at 22:10", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i thought you were selling it"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadich", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 8:13:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m not being funny, We got an Offer a few hours ago and we’re going to accept it."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt_14248
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt
subject: Re: Check ou - Sok pA Google
messages:
  [{"sender": "qa", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Check out (i - S6k pa Google", "body": "Click here - S6k pa Google | met this terrific girl in a church in Gotland, godmother to my friend Angelina Jolins baby girl..she was so beautiful | thought - and she is obviously! And nice! Wants to do more good for Africa than she already does..thought of you but she may not be the Swedish girl we look for....\n\n| am packing last minute - did not hear back from you...its ok | understand if it was much to ask for...but you did it last year so now when things are tough you spoilt me..! | will meet your friend Bill Clinton in Stockholm this Thursday - at the royal opera!! - next year SALSS - if | survive this year...will have a focus on Globalization and | thought | ask him to come....?! Anyway, off we go, me and Lalla...to start with to interview 10 candidates for FEOY 2011...Much love BE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["qa"], "timestamp": "2011-05-14 12:18:45 Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: Check out (i - S6k pa Google", "body": "she has been in my house. | will give you the 25k that you need."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Check out (i - S6k pa Google", "body": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN - YOU ARE THE BEST - YOU MADE NOT ONLY MY DAY BUT MY TRIP! TACK!!BE"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2011, at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou - Sok pA Google", "body": "25k from enhanced ed"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2011, at 5:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou - Sok pA Google", "body": "confirming that donation is to Stockholm School of Economics for 25k"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/16/2011 8:28:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou - Sok pA Google", "body": "Yes\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033499.txt_14250
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033499.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt_14257
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "May 20, 2016, at 8:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "rest"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This is a stupid and exhausting trip. No more speeches."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak.?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 2:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Iam about to go on stage. The first part of my presentation is about Trump."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt_14260
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Sunes"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the\nnuclear issue is the wrong strategy\n\nRay Takeyh\n\nFebruary 14, 2013 -- On Feb. 26, the United States and Iran will once\nmore resume their diplomatic ritual, in the so-called six-party talks, over\nIran's disputed nuclear program. As the two perennial adversaries eye one\nanother, there are competing paradigms about how to deal with Tehran.\n\nAn emerging school of thought suggests that the best means of \"testing\"\nIran is to offer it a final nuclear agreement that presumably promises\nmeasurable relief from sanctions for significant Iranian concessions. Iran's\nfailure to grasp such an offer would then conclusively demonstrate to both\ndomestic and international audiences that the cause of the impasse is not\nAmerican belligerence but Iranian truculence.\n\nBut this approach fails to recognize that an arms-control process is\nnecessarily an incremental one, nor does it offer a practical substitute to\nthe existing step-by-step diplomacy.\n\nIran's nuclear program encompasses a vast complex of enrichment\nfacilities, centrifuge construction plants, uranium extraction companies\nand thousands of scientists working in university and government\nlaboratories. Iran is enriching uranium at both 5% and 20% levels,\nexperimenting with high-velocity centrifuges and seemingly in the process\nof constructing additional enrichment facilities.\n\nSuch a multilayered, multifaceted program can be dealt with only on a\npiecemeal basis, as the technical details and rules for inspections are too\ncomplex to be addressed in a single agreement.\n\nMoreover, should the United States offer Iran a final deal, Tehran still has\na right to contest and negotiate its provisions and offer counterproposals."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt_14266
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt
subject: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 8:26:59 AM", "subject": "You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "Inside Job (2010)\nNYT Critics’ PickThis movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York\nTimes.\n\nSony Pictures Classics\n\nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary “Inside Job.”\n\nwho Maimed the Economy, and How\n\nBy A. QO. SCOTT\n\n“Inside Job,” a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime\nwithout punishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The\nbetrayal of public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and\ndamaging than the adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than\nvillain.\n\nThe gist of this movie, which begins in a mood of calm reflection and grows angrier and more incredulous\nas it goes on, is unmistakably punitive. The density of information and the complexity of the subject\nmatter make “Inside Job” feel like a classroom lecture at times, but by the end Mr. Ferguson has summoned\nthe scourging moral force of a pulpit-shaking sermon. That he delivers it with rigor, restraint and good\nhumor makes his case all the more devastating.\n\nHe is hardly alone in making it. Numerous journalists have published books and articles retracing the\npaths that led the world economy to the precipice two years ago. The deregulation of the financial\nservices industry in the 1980s and ’90s; the growing popularity of complex and risky derivatives; the\nreal estate bubble and the explosion of subprime lending -— none of these developments were exactly\nsecret. On the contrary, they were celebrated as vindications of the power and wisdom of markets.\nAccordingly, Mr. Ferguson recycles choice moments of triumphalism, courtesy of Lawrence H. Summers,\nGeorge W. Bush, Alan Greenspan and various cable television ranters and squawkers.\n\nEven as stock indexes soared and profits swelled, there were always at least a few investors, economists\nand government officials who warned that the frenzied speculation was leading to the abyss. Some of these\nprophets without honor show up in front of Mr. Ferguson’s camera, less to gloat than to present, once\nagain, the analyses that were dismissed and ignored by their peers for so long.\n\nDozens of interviews -— along with news clips and arresting aerial shots of New York, Iceland and other\ndisaster areas — are folded into a clear and absorbing history, narrated by Matt Damon. The music (an\nopening song, “Big Time,” by Peter Gabriel, and a score by Alex Heffes) and the clean wide-screen\ncinematography provide an aesthetic polish that is welcome for its own sake and also important to the\nmovie’s themes. The handsomely lighted and appointed interiors convey a sense of the rarefied, privileged\nworlds in which the wall Street operators and their political enablers flourished, and the elegance of\nthe presentation also subliminally bolsters the film’s authority. This is not a piece of ragged\nmuckraking or breathless advocacy. It rests its outrage on reason, research and careful argument.\n\nThe same was true of Mr. Ferguson’s previous documentary, “No End in Sight,” which focused on\ncatastrophic policies carried out in Iraq by President George W. Bush’s administration just after the\noverthrow of Saddam Hussein. But whereas that film concentrated on a narrow view of a complex subject —\nthe conduct of the war rather than the at least equally controversial rationale for fighting it - “Inside\nJob” offers a sweeping synthesis, going as far back as the Reagan administration and as far afield as\nIceland in its anatomy of the financial crisis.\n\nPerhaps unsurprisingly, many of the highest-profile players declined to be interviewed. Mr. Summers\nappears only in news footage, and none of his predecessors or successors as Treasury secretary — not\nRobert E. Rubin or Henry M. Paulson Jr. or Timothy F. Geithner — submit to Mr. Ferguson’s questions. Nor\ndo any of the top executives at Goldman Sachs or the other big banks. Most of the interviewees are, at\nleast from the perspective of the filmmaker, friendly witnesses, adding fuel to the director’s\ncomprehensive critique of the way business has been done in the United States and the other advanced\ncapitalist countries for the past two decades.\n\nBoth American political parties are indicted; “Inside Job” is not simply another belated settling of\naccounts with Mr. Bush and his advisers, though they are hardly ignored. The scaling back of government\noversight and the weakening of checks on speculative activity by banks began under Reagan and continued\nduring the Clinton administration. And with each administration the market in derivatives expanded, and\nalarms about the dangers of this type of investment were ignored. Raghuram Rajan, chief economist at the\nInternational Monetary Fund, presented a paper in 2005 warning of a “catastrophic meltdown” and was\nmocked as a “Luddite” by Mr. Summers.\n\nMeanwhile, some investment bankers -— at Goldman Sachs in particular -— were betting against the positions\nthey were pushing on their customers. An elaborate house of cards had been constructed in which bad\nconsumer loans were bundled into securities, which, were certified as sound by rating agencies paid by\nthe banks and then insured via credit-default swaps. One risky bet was stacked on top of another, and in\nretrospect the collapse of the whole edifice, along with the loss of jobs, homes, pensions and political\nconfidence, seems inevitable."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt_14272
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjgn Jaglan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 8:42:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, terrible times. If Trump wins in US I'll settle on your island. Before that, I'll be in NY in September. Lot of things to talk about."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "tirsdag 28. juni 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you must be a very busy man\nhope to seee you soon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt_14288
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:59:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt_14289
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt
subject: Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate from Deepak Chopra's Tweet\nDownload the Twitter app"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 14, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "nice to ee you, we should spend some time getting the app and board game right"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 1:25:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "Yes\nWill do"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029299.txt_14290
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029299.txt
subject: Michael Boccio
messages:
  [{"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2011 4:01:33 PM", "subject": "Michael Boccio", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nRecently while refurbishing Donald Trump's 757 I worked closely with his Director of Business Development / \nSpecial Counsel, Michael Boccio. \nAlthough I have worked with some very intelligent and creative individuals, Michael is a real stand out — he is \nimpressive on many levels. \nSomeone (or organization) is going to be excited to have someone with Michael's capabilities working for them \nand thought that you may need someone like Michael on your team or have a friend who may be in search of a \ndynamic individual with his background and talent. \nPlease take a moment to read the attached documents to see if Michael is someone you are looking for. If not, \nI ask that you forward this e-mail to someone you believe would greatly benefit by having Michael work for \nthem. \nI know that I always appreciate when a friend refers someone who can be of great help to me — personally or in \nbusiness. \nIf you have any questions about working with Michael, please do not hesitate to call me. \nThank you.\nAttached: Cover letter \nResume \nTrump Letter of Recommendation"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029218.txt_14292
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029218.txt
subject: Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers [as"], "timestamp": "10/9/2014 10:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "i have some ideas. call when you have a moment ."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "I fear she should have pulled out last week."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt_14297
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt_14299
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt
subject: Re: P.S.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:37:31 AM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "he can only be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.\n\nnot oath breaking. . impeachment not likely\n\n, but eventual resignation , a possiblitiy - maybe after a period of time. not for a while.\n\nmoney - its a privilege to help"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "I neglected to mention the importance of ACLU attorneys who have been receiving donations of many millions to aid their actions such as impeaching Trump based on breaking his oath of the affirmation of the constitution..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt_14303
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Ladr1 iii iii"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": ["Story [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:54:43 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt_14304
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2017 9:11:37 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Where? Fair ..and you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt_14307
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 11:04:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "looks like donald and mort are not to friendly..\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/ny-daily-news-calls-voters-mindless-zombies-after-donald-trump-wins-new-hampshire-2016-02-10/print"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt_14308
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt
subject: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin, \nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala. \nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information. \nLet me know how I can be of further assistance. \nAll the best, \nLena"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =) \nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night. \nSee you soon, \nKevin"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com)"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:21:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats). \nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. \nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access. \nI have the same ones (through Bill). \nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. \nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. \nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email! \nBoris"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt_14316
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2017 12:03:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is truly stupid."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431.txt_14330
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny <johnny.elhachem@edmond-de-rothschild.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future.\n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from you soon.\n\nTIIC\nTIIC Group backed by Edmond de Rothschild, is a pan-European infrastructure firm advising on mid-market infrastructure projects across Europe in both the transportation and social sectors. It was established in 2008 by the 3 founding partners of TIIC Group, Jaime d'Almeida, Manuel Cary and Francisco Mendes, with strategic support from the Edmond de Rothschild Group and Brisa.\n\nThe aim of TIIC Group is to bring an operational approach to infrastructure investments in Europe, drawing upon the extensive management and financial skills of its team members. These skills have been developed over many years at some of Europe's leading infrastructure operators and project financing firms which, when combined with the very specific infrastructure expertise of both the Edmond de Rothschild Group and Brisa, makes for a powerful and differentiated investment platform.\n\nTIIC Group operates from two offices in Lisbon and Paris, providing its team with access to relevant investment opportunities across key target markets in Europe as well as to leading industrial contractors, operators, advisors and financiers in the infrastructure industry.\n\nTIIC Group successfully raised a First Fund with €140m of commitments targeting transportation investments across Europe. The portfolio of the First Fund comprises 6 assets located in Portugal, Spain, France and Poland. They represent a carefully balanced mix of greenfield and early stage brownfield projects in roads and car parks. TIIC Group has played an active role in the sourcing and development of all investments and has made a significant contribution to value creation. TIIC Group believes that this is a high quality, operationally secure, cash yielding portfolio of assets which will be of strong interest to potential investors over the coming few years.\n\nTIIC has launched a successor fund, TIIC 2, which will build upon TIIC Group's differentiated approach to infrastructure in Europe. TIIC 2 will is targeting aggregate commitments from investors of €300m (€350m hard cap) to invest into both transportation and social infrastructure projects in Europe. TIIC 2 will also seek to invest, on a very selective basis, into greenfield social infrastructure projects in New Frontier Markets, within close proximity to the European Union. Given its powerful network of relationships across Europe and the operational skills of its team, TIIC Group will continue to target superior investment returns for TIIC 2's portfolio of assets. These returns should be in line with the anticipated returns from the First Fund portfolio which is forecast to deliver a gross IRR of up to 14% and a multiple of approximately 2x on invested capital.\n\nTIIC announced the first close of TIIC 2 on December 30th 2016, with aggregate commitments of €135m from a group of high quality and well-diversified limited partners. First close investors in TIIC 2 include the European Investment Bank and Edmond de Rothschild, both with significant commitments, as well as the TIIC team. TIIC 2 is also supported by a number of existing investors, together with several European insurance companies, pension funds and family offices. A second close is planned in the coming months and the final close will occur before the end of 2017. We have received significant interest from a number of European institutional investors, many of which are in the process of completing detailed due diligence on TIIC 2. We are firmly on track to achieve a final close of TIIC 2 before the end of the year.\n\nFurthermore, TIIC has announced the first exit from Fund 1, with outstanding returns. Three other investments are in sales processes and should close during the next few months.\n\nBRIDGE\nBRIDGE is an infrastructure debt platform initiated by Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management (EdRAM) to enable institutional investors to access infrastructure assets with secured and stable revenue streams. BRIDGE is a London based second generation debt fund sourcing and structuring transactions directly from sponsors when feasible and one of the few independent debt teams only investing on behalf of clients. The BRIDGE team has the ability to execute and deliver transactions as efficiently as traditional lenders as well as negotiate terms and conditions bringing optimised yield and security to investors.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform was set up as a new leg of EDR's Infrastructure, Real Assets & Structured Finance Team striving to take advantage of the expertise of the infrastructure sector acquired when the team became a global leader in PPP & Transport infrastructure financial advisory in 2011 and 2012.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform raised € 400m of new monies in 2016 and has successfully reached the €1bn mark of Assets under Management at the end of 2016. The platform comprises three investment vehicles (French FCT and Lux SIF) and is currently fundraising for additional pockets of liquidity:\no BRIDGE I reached final closing in December 2014 with approximately €600m of aggregate commitments from a club of institutional investors.\no BRIDGE I Dedicated Compartmentis a vehicle created by a large European institution and anchor investor of the first fund with a €250m target amount available for deployment.\no BRIDGE II reached first close in December 2016 with €150m of commitments in order to invest in three transactions. Fundraising for BRIDGE ll is still ongoing, targeting a group of institutional investors in Europe and elsewhere, with final target size of €600m.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform has a long-term European investment strategy and a mandate to cover all sectors of infrastructure, notably energy, renewables, utilities, transportation, telecommunications and social infrastructure and can execute project financing, refinancing and acquisition finance transactions.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform currently comprises investments of between €20-120 million each, in 17 European infrastructure transactions. In 2016 alone, the BRIDGE team has achieved financial close for 11 infrastructure deals in Europe aggregating ca. €390m. When benchmarked against other similar funds, the investment team has succeeded in deploying faster and with credit spreads well above the infrastructure senior debt benchmark, enabling BRIDGE to become a force in the growing institutions-backed infrastructure debt market. BRIDGE's ability to invest beyond the traditional definition of core infrastructure and to structure transactions was a key differentiator when Edmond de Rothschild launched this platform, as part of its commitment to real economy. BRIDGE is innovative in the sense that the investment team sources transactions directly from sponsors and is actively involved in the structuring phase, acting as Mandated Lead Arranger.\n\nBRIDGE comprises a large, international and skilled London based investment team of 11 investment professionals who between them have arranged more than €100bn of landmark infrastructure deals over the last 20 years across the globe. The BRIDGE team is among the largest within the debt funds universe and demonstrates the Edmond de Rothschild Group's commitment to the platform.\n\nKind regards,\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to 10% per yr with a kicker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 23:22", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "not likely in the states. too much money around. you should find a niche. otherwise competing with people that have a trillion dollars in credit needs"}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Pension funds are now interested to match the maturities ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/9/2017 10:45:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "yes, and their projections and needs are way above current spreads. . At least in the states hospitals are now looking to sell real estate surrounding complexes. . assisted living, baby boomers. . airport funds starting for rebuilds. but very large. rail ports and roads also gigantic. . . no politically correct but profitable is alternate incarceration facilities. , always tenants:)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt_14336
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt
subject: Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\n\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth stocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle.   Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on TV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen.  I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good hamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling discussions.  Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt ceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency.  The implication: reservations about raising the debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then.  This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt ceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States.  Today, the proposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues.  While a default is a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is bad as well.  Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal Reserve would keep yields in check.  That logic is irresponsible at best.  Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way for a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest.  \n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been raised up the flagpole and then lowered.  By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3 trillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all).  However, Congress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first.   For now, we wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to.  Last week’s Profiles in Courage piece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here.  Here’s our take on what has been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what steps they recommend to get to that baseline first.  For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s budget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71% debt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place.\n\nI have a feeling that revenue increases will be a material (e.g., 25% or more) part of the deal.  The Peterson Foundation’s sampling of 6 policy groups shown below indicate that 5 of 6 recommend revenue increases compared to where we are today; the Heritage Foundation’s “Woody Guthrie Memorial Budget Plan” is the only exception.  What kind of revenue increases?  Raising the top two brackets, which would affect joint filers with adjusted gross incomes above $212,300, would raise $450-$700 billion over 10 years (depending on whether you use OMB or CBO numbers).  If they cannot agree to raise rates, another option (as in the Gang of Six plan) would be reductions in the deductibility of state and local taxes, sales taxes, mortgage interest, etc.  As this gets sorted out, let’s hope everyone recognizes that the US tax system is already progressive.  As shown in the chart below, effective Federal tax rates for low earners have dropped to zero over the last decade, even after including FICA taxes.  News reports that the US tax system is regressive make me want to throw hamburgers at the screen.\n\nEurope: Finally (!!), but now what?\n\nFor the first time since 2009, it felt last week like European policymakers were trying to get out in front of things.  In exchange for a modest amount of “private sector involvement”, Germany agreed to more generous financing terms for Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and an expanded role for the EU-IMF lending facility (see following page).  What would the plan accomplish if implemented?  While Greek debt to GDP ratios would remain well over 125% of GDP (the IMF estimate for next year is a ridiculous 170%), Greece’s near-term financing obligations would decline, due to debt buybacks, exchanges into long maturity bonds, and interest grace periods on new EU loans.  More broadly, the plan also allows for money to be lent to countries before they enter into an IMF program, for recapitalization of banks.  All things considered, it’s the broadest defense of the Monetary Union so far.  On paper, it even looks like a free ride for holders of Greek paper that don’t participate in the debt exchanges (they would be paid at par).  So, what’s not to like?  Well, there are still questions about Greece:\n\n** There’s a big difference between generous financing terms and generous economic terms.  Greece must still meet an enormous 5%-6% primary budget surplus target (government revenues less spending, pre-interest) during a recession\n\n** Greece must execute on its asset sale targets, despite having little success or experience doing this in the past \n\n** Banks listed in the IIF document (the committee representing them) are under no binding legal obligation to participate in the debt exchanges, and may turn out to own less Greek debt than currently believed.  [Note: bank participation in the Latin Brady bond era was high, since at the time, banks held almost all the paper, and in the form of illiquid loans].\n\nThe big question: would Germany still live up to the deal if Greece missed deficit targets or assets sales, if bank participation was too low, or if hedge funds (once referred to by the Chairman of the German Social Democratic Party as a “swarm of locusts”) reaped large free rider windfalls?  Ultimately, this is a political question.  If “yes”, Germany will underwrite Greece no matter what; if “no”, then a broader, coercive Greek restructuring might follow in the not-so-distant future.\n\nIn addition to execution risk in Greece, we are left with 3 other concerns.  The current EU-IMF lending facility capacity is Eur 255 bn, but we anticipate that as agreed, national parliaments will expand it to 440 bn.  First concern: while that’s to deal with problems in Greece, Portugal and Ireland, if you include Spain, it gets tight (note: the chart excludes costs to recapitalize banks).  If Italy or Belgium entered Europe’s Liquidity Hospital, a lot more money might be needed from European parliaments (in one worst-case scenario, Alliance Bernstein estimates that the EU lending facility would have to increase from 440 bn to 1.7 trillion Euros, mostly from Germany).   Italy faces a multi-notch downgrade from Moody’s, which is not going to help.  As we discussed two weeks ago, Italy has been a model citizen in terms of running low budget deficits for 20 years, but still cannot escape the confines of its very large existing debt stock (120% of GDP). \n\nSecond, as shown below, Europe is now a two-speed economy, with the periphery stuck in neutral (industrial production is one proxy for this; there are others, such as unemployment, consumption, export shares, etc).  If the idea behind the EU/IMF effort is that austerity will boost growth and lead these countries back to the public markets, there is very little momentum in this direction.   If the status quo in the periphery does not change, all the EU package does is allow the current approach more time to fail.  \n\nThe third concern: Germany as paymaster.  We are often told that Germans across both major parties are unflinching supporters of the European project, and will do whatever it takes to prevent a break-up.  The objections from members of the Bundesbank are described as lonely voices of opposition that carry no weight [a].  But how large are the costs going to be?  German politicians and voters may see current circumstances as exceptional, and that if they just agree to one more package, the problem will go away.   However, we are starting to see analyses of how costly a permanent transfer union may be for Germany.  Bernard Connolly at Hamiltonian Advisors sent me a recent paper from the Centrum fur Europaische Politik in Freiburg, which provides some clues.  They see three alternatives for the deficit countries: \n\n** massive reduction in regulations and unit labor costs to regain competitiveness\n\n** exit from the EMU, re-introduction of national currencies\n\n** permanent transfer union from surplus countries to deficit ones\n\nOn the last option, they estimate a “creditworthiness gap” in European deficit countries of Eur 108 billion in 2010.  The gap measures how much European deficit countries rely on capital inflows to fund consumption, rather than investment (which contributes to future GDP).   Germany’s share of the European surplus is around ¾, so let’s assume a pro-rata burden on Germany to maintain the transfer union.  As a result, the theoretical economic cost could be 3.3% of German GDP every year, which as shown, gets close to some expensive episodes in German history.   If German citizens were faced with costs this high, it could be a White Castle hamburger-throwing moment of national proportions.\n\nBottom line.  At a time when European equities are trading close to 2009 lows relative to earnings and book value, this package could result in a relief rally for European equities, particularly banks.  The chance of a disorderly default in 2011 has decreased markedly, and a process has been put in place to create more seamless transfers to areas (and banks) in need.  But the size of the transfer union fund is not big enough to allay all concerns, particularly with Spain and Italy growing at anemic levels, and there is execution risk in Greece.  \n\nRecent bank stress tests conducted by the EU concluded that only Eur 2.5 billion of capital needs to be raised (70 to 80 billion sounds more reasonable to us).  And in the package announced last week, the following Orwellian clause indicates how European policymakers feel about rating agencies these days: \n\nPoint 15.  We agree that reliance on external credit ratings in the EU regulatory framework should be reduced, taking into account the Commission's recent proposals in that direction, and we look forward to the Commission proposals on credit ratings agencies\n\nIn Europe, denial appears to be an essential ingredient to the process (See “Five Stages of Greece”, June 30, 2011).  Last week’s package is a bold step towards Federalization and the worst-case outcomes have been avoided (money market failures, bank runs, etc), but markets will remain nervous about Europe.\n\nWhile we’re waiting: large cap growth stocks\n\nOne day, the melodramas around US and European sovereign debt will end.  While we’re waiting, one of the asset classes that looks attractive is large cap growth stocks.  As shown below (for a universe of 300 U.S. large cap growth stocks that meet certain earnings quality and stability factors), free cash flow relative to both revenues and stock prices looks good compared to the last four decades.   This is where we believe investors should be adding exposure if they are underweight versus their desired equity allocations.  This is also an asset class where active management can still provide a lot of value; the dispersion of large cap growth managers is higher than large cap core, large cap value and international equity manager dispersion.\n\nQ2 earnings season in the US is off to a good start.  Nearly 30% of the S&P has reported, and results have generally been positive.  Earnings are beating consensus estimates by almost 4% (7.4% ex-financials), all ten sectors are beating on revenue targets, and only 7% of companies are reporting below-consensus earnings.  Given earnings expectations for 2011 at $98.50, the S&P 500 is trading at a reasonable 13.5x forward multiple.   However, y/y earnings growth expectations appear to be flattening out for both 2011 and 2012 at around 11%-12%.  While Q2 earnings are doing well so far, some company guidance for the remainder of the year has been below consensus, which would be consistent with the recent batch of reports indicating a slowdown in manufacturing and service sector surveys.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt_14350
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt
subject: Re: High Profile
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nYour name popped up again in the Press and I thought it was time to congratulate you on your wonderful\nfinancial successes since your days as my Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good!!\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press provides you with much benefit.\nPerhaps I am wrong? Not the first time!!\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging certainly ain’t for sissy’s.\n\nRegards,\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in Amagansett in November."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith PO"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt_14355
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 11:56:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was good...judge is new and afraid to go outside the box...maybe I should rep your buddy here...agreed to\n\nmeet pence one-on-one Thursday in de"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how did today go .. _ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-\nalleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343.txt_14364
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Free afternoon"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:56:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lunch tomorrow? Or after? I have 4:00 appt. anytime before works."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt_14373
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt
subject: Re: Quick question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc, \nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the\ngovernment in general, etc?"}, {"sender": "Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Do you want more free city for chanukH?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hmm perhaps. But I was thinking that I maybe wanted a speaker system for my room and bathroom..?!?"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 03:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "As always , whatever you want!! \nSorry for all the typos ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt_14382
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2018 3:32:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025110.txt_14401
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025110.txt
subject: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious manner.\nAttached and below the same.\nDear Jeffrey:\nAs requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV series \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\":\n(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional understandings) to justify a major TV series?\n(ii) Even if 'yes' to (i), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?\nIn preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the \"Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams\" (2012) and the sole author of the forthcoming \"An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams\" (Cambridge University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.\nWhen we asked Patrick, his first response — \"This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story\" — and he cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and established, and (ii) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes (e.g., PTSD and Depression).\nTo understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that there are two distinct kinds of sleep — REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves (electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).\nFollowing are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.\nMemory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories. Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders. This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is 'down-regulated' (and the frontal cortex is associated with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is 'up-regulated\" (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep and dreams can enhance creativity.\nAs Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\nWarm regards,\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for —10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\nWhen good to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Apr 8, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "will be back in new york wed . happy passover"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 5:56:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Got it\nnnv"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973.txt_14405
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "john and i agree that maybe you shoudl take money from edge. as opposed to me ,, if it helps"}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Richard and I have already been in touch about the transfer to the project I work with here at UBC, and it seems there is no problem (I'll check with our admin right now). Thank you, though!\n\np.s. What the heck is happening to the financial markets and how are you going to help?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "they are being feminized."}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well, you're the gyneconomist. Better get to work."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i would need my speculumator to gauge accurately"}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/4/2011 8:21:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yuck. Maybe borrow one from Clinton?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt_14408
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017 11:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will begin"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland <thorbjon.jagland@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You should feel well for having done so much for us"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:26:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Makes me happy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt_14415
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal | as |"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. 1 want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. Iam sick as a dog with a cold. Iam supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a\ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist?\n\nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the\nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show\ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on.\n\nT have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried...I have emailed three doctors this morning!\nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call.\n\nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in\nthe planes.\n\nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because it's 3D.\n\nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue....it's going to be highest grossing film in the world is an\nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal | as |"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow.. no cleaning. stay in bed.. sorry.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt_14420
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt
subject: January 20, 2017
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey,\n\nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!!\n\nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA!\n\nLOVE & KISSES\n\nBE for your BBB!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt_14421
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:35:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are We meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "qR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt_14425
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt
subject: Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 9:18:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'", "body": "Hello Jeffrey \nI understood very well that it is in the Congress's hands now; \nBut there are a lot of reactions"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030211.txt_14429
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030211.txt
subject: Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/11/2013 3:22:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "---------- Forwarded message ----------"}, {"sender": "Fabrice Aidan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 11, 2013", "subject": "Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "You'll find it interesting. Warm regards\nEnvoyé de mon iPhone\n\nDébut du message transféré :"}, {"sender": "GBIU-MideastNews <GBIU-MideastNews@dentons.com>", "recipients": ["Cheves, Belle", "Gray, Alex", "Mahle, Melissa", "Seche, Stephen A.", "Dixon, Timothy"], "timestamp": "11 juillet 2013 16:43:09 UTC+02:00", "subject": "(s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "Atlantic Council\n\nSyria: Blackberry Diplomacy\nBy Frederic C. Hof\n\nJuly 11, 2013\n\nA friendly discussion about Syria with a former US State Department colleague gave rise to a point |\nwill not soon forget. \"Fred, there's no time for policy deliberations about Syria or anyplace else. We\nlive in the era of Blackberry diplomacy. We react and we improvise as best we can.\"\n\nAnyone under the age of thirty reading the above would probably think, \"Why in the world is the US\ngovernment using the Blackberry?\" Those who turned thirty long before the end of the last century—\neven those of us who try seriously not to be technological Luddites—wonder sometimes if the\ncommunications revolution and the 24/7 news cycle it has spawned will end up doing more harm than\ngood to the progress of civilization and well-being of the republic.\n\nThose who have had the privilege and burden of working in the US national security establishment\nare well-acquainted with how hard it is to find time to think. This was true long before the advent of\nemail and other forms of electronic communication. Although there may have been times when\nofficials could contemplate great matters of state at something approaching leisure, those days have\nbeen long gone. Even offices created expressly to explore policy options stretching beyond a twenty\nminute horizon—the State Department's Policy Planning Staff comes to mind—routinely get pulled\ninto the maelstrom of daily struggles to manage breaking developments through some combination of"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt_14434
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt
subject: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2019 8:08:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "This is what I'm now going with--what do you think?\n\nIn the White House, the President, to general surprise, announced that he would not accompany his family to\nMar-a-Lago over the holidays—a confounding, even alarming, turn for anyone who knew how much he valued\na golf-and-warm-weather opportunity over any presidential business. Melania certainly had no intention of\nstaying behind. Among other issues, friends suggested that she was still furious about his fireside Christmas Eve\nchat with a seven-year-old boy, during which Trump asked the boy if he still believed in Santa. \"Melania didn’t\nthink that was funny,” said one aide. Trump was “clearly a guy who had never dealt with a seven-year-old.”\n\nIn an empty White House, Trump’s personal secretary, 28-year-old Madeleine Westerhout, brought his\npapers and call sheets from the West Wing up to the residence, finding him, she told friends, in his underwear.\nAnd herein, suddenly, was another subplot.\n\nWesterhout had been the elevator girl in Trump Tower during the transition. The comely young woman ferrying\ndignitaries and job-seekers up to the President-elect soon became something of a meme herself. Bannon recalled\nnoting that Trump took a particular interest in her. A leering Trump kept repeating, ““She’s got a way about her,”\nhis signature, and creepy, stamp of approval for young women.\n\nNow the president was telling friends that he wasn’t staying at the White House because of the shutdown—he\nwas staying because he was “banging” Madeleine.\n\nShutdown bravado? Locker room talk? Or all part of a new alternative reality that only he seemed to be living\nin?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt_14439
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 29 2013 04:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Antigua: Land Of Sun, Sand, And Super Cheap Downloads\n\nby Jacob Goldstein\n\nhttp://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/01/28/170466137/antigua-_ land-of-sun-sand-and-super-cheap-downloads\nJanuary 28, 2013 3:07 PM\n\nSun, sand and super cheap downloads.\n\nAny day now, you might be able to download Argo, Lincoln and Les Mis for a dime a piece. Microsoft Office could go for a quarter. Asong might cost a penny. And it could all be perfectly legal under international law.\n\nAs part of a long-running trade dispute, the tiny island nation of Antigua and Barbuda (population: 90,000) won the right to use the intellectual property of U.S. firms — without having to pay any royalties or licensing fees.\n\nAta meeting in Geneva today, the country got the final go ahead from the World Trade Organization. The fight goes back to the 1990s, when a bunch of online casinos set up shop in Antigua. After\n\nthe U.S. cracked down on the casinos, Antigua complained to the WTO, arguing that the U.S.\nwas unfairly protecting its domestic casinos in violation of free trade rules.\n\nAntigua won the case. Typically, when a country wins a case at the WTO, it wins the right to, say, put a tariff on goods from the losing country. But Antigua is so small that tariffs wouldn't have any noticeable effect on the U.S. economy.\n\nSo Antigua took another route: It asked the WTO to recover damages in the form of intellectual property, and the WTO said yes. If this seems likely to cause harm to innocents who had nothing to do with the fight over online casinos, that's the whole point.\n\n\"It's so Bill Gates might ring up Obama and say, 'Why have | lost my copyright so you can protect gaming?” Mark Mendel, the lawyer representing Antigua told me. (By \"gaming,\" Mendel means the U.S. casino business.)\n\nTo be clear, the Bill Gates reference was hypothetical. Antigua has not yet said what it plans to sell or how it plans to sell it. And whatever it sells, it's not going to be able to sell all that much of it. The WTO said Antigua can collect only about $21 million a year in damages.\n\nIn fact, Mendel says, Antigua really doesn't want to do this at all. What it wants is to cut some kind of\ndeal directly with the U.S. that would revive the country's online gambling industry, or help create some other industry in its place."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt_14443
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch . He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When?...(did you ask him after or before he got his grand jury subpoena?)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "After"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 9:10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He shouldn't laugh off the grand jury"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt_14462
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:40:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031234.txt_14463
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031234.txt
subject: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\n\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.\n\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time.\n\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement.\n\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\n\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\n\nIncident 1:\n\n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C.\n\n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was “of age.”\n\n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n\n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt_14468
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miles Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "Dear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island's manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,\n\nMiles Alexander"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 7:43:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020442.txt_14478
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020442.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Il giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": null, "body": "paraphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise. Hell in this case would\nbe the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The “army of darkness” is already among us.\n\nIn Sacratissimo Corde Jesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve@bannon.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": "<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt_14484
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt
subject: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12: PM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\n\nJay"}, {"sender": "Alexandra Wolfe", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. would he be available to answer any of these on\nthe phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he\ncould tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the\ninformation I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\ncould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the\nsame clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-what is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt_14486
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:07:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil ina fundamental way"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030666.txt_14500
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030666.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:05:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep...order rod to fire him...rod would refuse...gets rid of him too...twofer...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033279.txt_14513
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033279.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/12/2018 12:36:12 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey, \nRumor at the PBI airport is President Trump is due to arrive PBI Monday the 16th and stay until 23rd or \n24th , \nThis means we can only arrive in PBI from Teterboro after the 16th. \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032065.txt_14528
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032065.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "TE Darren indyke", "IM: Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 9:10:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/donald-trump-sued-sexual-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-claims/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt_14529
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Ban)"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 4:32:45 PM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It was that article in La Repubblica which you asked to be translated this afternoon.\n\nIn Sacratissimo Corde Jesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon [iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2018 11:25:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Translation to follow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030882.txt_14537
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030882.txt
subject: Re: A few questions just in case please?
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nDe eee eee ee ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 14, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to\nknow. ? is obama good for the country, .? israel? . if you could live one day of your lives over again, what\nwould it be?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 5:16:35 AM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Thank you! Was amazing! The best family dinner ever. Louis said they LOVED me! Thu both texted him\nafterwards saying that:)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031544.txt_14540
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031544.txt
subject:
  Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost

messages:
  [{"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 11:13:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "it's just a start. we'll do more and push them up to the top in google search.\nshould be there in mid September.\n\nthank you for your advice too. You said women never sell and you was right. so I just sold my shares in one\nstartup. 10x in 15 months. wouldn't agree to sell if we didn't speak ;)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 24, 2017, at 4:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "good work. thx. when are you next on east coast"}, {"sender": "Si", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_599f532ae4b0d0ef9flc129d"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033245.txt_14546
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033245.txt
subject: Barrack/Mexico
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/10/2017 6:35:55 PM", "subject": "Barrack/Mexico", "body": "Pitched him/his people on a profile a few weeks ago. They said they were inclined to do it but would \nhave to wait a bit because  there are some things in the air. Without being specific. \nDo you think he takes it?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033251.txt_14559
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033251.txt
subject: Cuba trip
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "9/16/2017 7:57:47 PM", "subject": "Cuba trip", "body": "Jeffrey \nI've contact universal ref Cuba trip: \nAttached is current form they are utilizing,. \nSee note from UVAir below:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032629.txt_14565
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032629.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in \nnew york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:26:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m prayingc4-14"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033114.txt_14584
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033114.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stephen Hanson [i"], "timestamp": "9/7/2018 3:17:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/trump-un-security-council-iran.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt_14594
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt
subject: Re: Alexandra Wolf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 02 09:02:02 2011", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-j effrey-ep steins-society-friends-\nclose-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "Just read Alex's blog. Its pretty harmless. \nDo you know Debbie Bancroft? Why is she giving quotes about you? She is a fat drunk with no money and a bad marriage. She \nwrites or did write a pathetic social column about losers. Did you ever meet her? She is a joke. \nPeg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 12:21:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "never"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012623.txt_14596
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012623.txt
subject: RE: Do you have a signed copy?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "09/24/2007 04:04 PM", "subject": "Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Hi Jay — Sorry to be a bother, but do you have a copy that at least contains Mr. Epstein’s signature? I need to pass it along to the powers that be. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C, (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Monday, September 24, 2007 4:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Marie - Please do whatever you can to keep this from becoming public.\n\nthanks -- Jay"}, {"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C, (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/24/2007 04:34 PM", "subject": "RE: Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Thank you, Jay. I have forwarded your message only to Alex, Andy, and Rolando. I don't anticipate it going any further than that. When I receive the originals, I will sign and return one copy to you. The other will be placed in the case file, which will be kept confidential since it also contains identifying information about the girls.\n\nWhen we reach an agreement about the attorney representative for the girls, we can discuss what I can tell him and the girls about the agreement. I know that Andy promised Chief Reiter an update when a resolution was achieved. (Something I wouldn’t have promised in light of what happened last year.) Rolando is calling, but Rolando knows not to tell Chief Reiter about the money issue, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time that has been agreed to. Rolando also is telling Chief Reiter not to disclose the outcome to anyone."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt_14605
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "171,=•• \nSteve Bannon \nto me \nFeb 24 (1 day ago) \nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classifled-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437  \n\ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the \nrecord."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "onlyu slightly. ariane said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out \nWhat is Benjamin upset about?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Barf."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:33:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yup"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023205.txt_14608
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023205.txt
subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it \nwould take us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I \ntaped Woody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances?\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:36:12 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "write me a letter using only the top list and forward me his clip please"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031601.txt_14615
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031601.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl \nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump. \nBecause of this. \n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is \neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it \n-- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\" \n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am serious man -- for the good of the nation why not try to get some of this out there. I would not \ndo it myself, but would pass on to a political reporter."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:14:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "http://en.actu-cci.com/features/200-women-managers/8910-celina-midelfart-the-queen-of-glamour my 20 year \nold girlfriend in 93„ that after two years i gave to donald"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt_14621
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt
subject: Re: Deal info
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anthony"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:27:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "funn, but quite a mess"}, {"sender": "A Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "Hi jeffrey, \nCam across this...perhaps you have some interest?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033100.txt_14631
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033100.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\n\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:13:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt_14633
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt
subject: Re: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/20/2012 1:23:57 PM", "subject": "a", "body": "How about this year's SALSS Project Manager SE - brainy and sensual!\n\nPicture attached!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt_14638
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt
subject: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "es ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 2:42:38 PM", "subject": "Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate ©? | moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich as there was a\nfabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I’m going to try to get on with Trump as an\nadvisor. He’s going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of Senior Financial Abuse in CA and FL.\n\nAlso, starting anew company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the earlier we catch\nit the better. I’ve been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it’s remarkable the results I’ve been\nable to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with people/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about\ngetting the best care. | stress ‘serious’ because | don’t want to get into a situation like as last summer.\n\nHow is Fred? It’s just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding a school\nfor his son... | think of where Fred could be today, and instead he’s probably locked up in his apartment with no help that\nhas dementia training — he probably thinks he’s crazy by now. Know you like Joe, but it was sad sad sad that he didn’t\nlet me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were the truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie\nMadoff too)....\n\nAnyway — the past. I’m charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it’s all highly confidential. A\ncustomized ‘mind-body’ enhancement to achieve the most out of one’s life! And, training for the family to help\n\ntransition to the ‘new reality’ with their loved one with later stage dementia.\n\nI’m in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator’s Club, and will stay over the weekend. Love to see you\nif you’re in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company - but Joe probably won’t let that\n\nhappen ®.\nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness, z=\n\nPS. Any idea how to get rid of this damn smoking gun article? It’s now the first thing you see when googling me..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030699.txt_14650
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030699.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:42:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, yes, that's their continuing resistance speaking. But that doesn't change the fact that it is their ONLY option. AND it's a slam-dunk one. She would turn it around. If Dylan is coming out to speak publicly, Soon-Yi also has to. If Dylan is allowed to be the center of this story, Woody is cooked. If Soon-Y1i claims it--and she is actually the center of the story--everything shifts and they can make it their own."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not intellectually capable. . and frankly -unwiling. my shrink says ........"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers. no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which 1 believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times . two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist” platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt_14656
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:45:53 2011", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "just got it two minutes ago.. I ve asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure,, it is so salcisous and ridiculous, im\nnot sure how to respond,, the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis"}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Please make sure that every statement or legal letter states clearly that lam NOT involved and that I knew and know NOTHING about any\nof these allegations.\nI can't take any more of this my end."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032550.txt_14658
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032550.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barnaby Marsh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "since luck is not zero sum. cant figure out how to move up the curve."}, {"sender": "Barnaby Marsh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2017 2:55:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perhaps its not the important dimension? If some share advantages of luck and otherse dont, the curve flattens,\nor becomes bimodal. one can imagine the fomation of \"lucky enclaves\" where luck is actually manufactured in\na sense, and effects kept inthe group and further amplified. In a way, it is a kind of \"market\" to capture unusual\nevents or to create cascades of events that would be otherwise difficult to create, anticipate, or predict?. I was at\nlunch yesterday with Dan Rose and he was saying that all of the major real estate families in NYC (excepting\nTrump) collectively think of the longer-term consequences of their actions for the larger group of dynasties.\n\nHow do these \"intentinal\" actions affect the natrual probability distributions? Perhaps not at all (!!!) but they\nmight shift the curve or displace others at different places in the aggregate population (the curve). Lets keeep\nthinking.\n\nBTW, this also has implication for my life (and yours)- we want to be members of various \"lucky groups\"\n(physical, mental, emotional, intellectual, etc), and if we pick the right sub-group, there will be natural\nregression to the mean in that group.... so, surround yourself with people as gifted or more, and use the power of\nRTM? Sometimes, it only works if the gaps are not too large, but I have found it a very useful heuristic in life...\nin lots of areas.\n\nWhen are you back?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt_14661
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt
subject: Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 5:44:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey <Jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033286.txt_14665
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033286.txt
subject: Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton: Bill Richardson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2016 2:21:38 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton: Bill Richardson", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/04/donald-trump-could-beat-hillary-clinton-bill-richardson.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033292.txt_14670
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033292.txt
subject: hello
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 4:21:38 PM", "subject": "hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nAre you going to survive with Trump? \nAre you coming to Cannes for Woody's movie? \nBig kiss"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032544.txt_14674
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032544.txt
subject: Re: Still in NYC
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:57:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Do you think this means anything more than that it is Italy?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "His son was in my son's class at Collegiate."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Krumholtz"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Who is your colonoscopy man?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Colonoscopy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Breakfast?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "New York tonight"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "I've been cancelled on for today. Appears everybody gone to ground. Seems Priebus decision expected."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031593.txt_14678
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031593.txt
subject: Re: Today...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Have you read? When's good to talk?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "be back on land around 4"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wola"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 4:20:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about\nwomen, 1 thought we modified that."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030245.txt_14686
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030245.txt
subject: the story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 1:35:22 PM", "subject": "the story", "body": "1. all the girls discussed in the press , came to the house , to give erotic massages. each and every girl , each \ntime, came in exchange for money. many of the girls interviewed were in their mid twenties early thirties, no \nsearching for underage girls. many of the girls worked in the local massage parlors. ( advertised everyday in \nthe palm beach papers. , referred in the local vernacular to \" jack shacks\". 5 within 4 miles of the intl airpot. \n) or strip clubs.. ( both of the girls bringing the cvra case ). \n2. There have been discussios of a house full of underage photos. the video taken by the police contradict that \nin its entirety \n3 there have been discsussion about hidden video cameras, they were put there with the HELP of the local \nPolice , in order to catch a thief money had been going missing , and the police cam , set up cameras, and \none night hid in the bushes hoping to catch the thief in the act. It turned out to be the houseman. who \nconfessed, . there were never any hidden cameras anywhere besides the garage and the camera in the living \nroom focused on the place where money was kept \n4. The police conducted a search, and found adult sextoys, I am an adult, they made a point to say that there \nwas a purple plastic sex toy„ but later without correcting their earliler assertion disconver it was nothing but a \nsalad fork \n5. The girl whose parents initiated the investigation, told the police in a sworn statment that she had lied about \nher age to gain access to the house. she said she tried her best to appear over 18 , as she wanted to be invited \nback, there was not trolling for anyone underage. \n6. many if not most of the girls , invited their friends , best friends after they had left. hardly a normal result \nif there had been any coercion or anytrhing untoward. \n7, many of the girls had their boyfirends wait downstairs, or in some instances their parents. not one \ntime did anyone ever complain of mistreatment , \n8 there was never ever any drugs , alcolhol, threats, coercion \n9 the local sex crimes prosecutor, lana belahovilc , interviewed the girls herself , and concluded in her own \nwords dire wer no real victims here. just local prostituion. she offer a 5 year probation sentence with no \nregistration. . Alan dershowitwz told me I shouldnt take it. it was too dangerous. not telling me that my \nprobation would have been moved to my home in the virigin islands. then the prosecutors to be \nfair presented their information to a grand jury, the ONLY time a jury would see any of the claims, the result \nwas a charge of soliction of prostituion . a crime with a mandatory release after taking a harms of prostiution \ncourse. This was a grand jury determination. \n10. local. no transportation across state lines, contrary to outragious and hbeious \nallegations, no trafficking. it is a disservice to women who are trafficked to compare a woman brought into \nthe country , tied to a bed, given drugs to have sex with strangers for money that she doesnt get. . to girsl who \ntook a taxi to my house, had food snacks and got paid, then went shopping with her friedns and back home. \n11/ the fbi decided to pursue a highly unusual case. their position was that my secretary , not ire, called girls \non the telephone and asked them if they would like to work. . many times as the message pads reveall the \ngirls called over and over again askking to work, hardly coercion ( the latest \ncases REQURE coercion, which states it is NOT for making appts ....... \n12 THe fbi, threatend many statutes if i would not plead guilty to a state crime, they suggested that a cell \nphone was a means of interstae commerce ( similar to perverts who troll the intern& , in searhc of underage \ngirsl , and in each and every one of those cases the govt is required to confirm , and they do,that the person \nKNEW or that the person on the other end of the computer was underage. . all stings hve the police stinger ask \ndont you know that i am 14, 13 etc. there was never any such conversation with anyone. \n13. the govt said that traveling to my homeof 15 year in florida, ccould be considered traveling for thepurpsoe \nof underage sex. never before anyone not crossing state lines with a person , charged with a crimge for going \nhome \n14. the gov said that they would not bring an indictment if i plead guilty to being a pimp.( a crime in florida \nthat REQUIRES the pimpt to earh money off the the girls , ( regster as a sex offender ) and pay a list of girls \nwhose names they would provide me only AF l'ER the fact. and AF l'ER i was in jail. I would have to agree \nNOT to contest any claim by anyone they put on the list . when I attempted to do so , as i never met some of \nthe people on the list. I reived a letter stating that any attempt to question their story would result in a breech of \nmy agreeernnt. \n15. If I had tto do it over I hope i would have shown much better judgement as many of the girls came from \nunderprivleged familys and i was unaware of the potential for halm. \n16. , has said she was a sex slave. . she has now admited she lied about her age. she was \nnever 15. she has changed th story on my wikipieia page , but no press statment. she said that clinton was on \nthe island, not true, she said ghilsane flew him in a black helipcopter, I did not have a black heli and she \nnever flew him, she said that al gore and wife were on the isalnd never happened, she has accused a prime \nminisnter a senator a prinve. a sceintist, alan dershowitz. a many in his seventies with his wife in \nattendance. sex on a plane with secret service and dimplanic protection people looking the other way. . she \nhad an arrest warmat for her as she stole money from the restaurnat at which she worked, she had before made \nclainds of sexual assualts but the prosecutro said she had no creidbility , 1 emiails , suggst \nadding alan dershowitz to her complaint. emails suggest•might have comminted pergury \n. she has said that the house had many photos of underage girls , a recent press realease clearly shows \nanother lie. \n17, the press has labled me a pedophile a disgusting term for men atracted to pre pubcesnet girsl. . these \ngirls worked in a strip club. . Not one person ever testified that they were asked to bring underage girls , in \nfact the opposite. all said they were told on one under 18. fbi foia request . confirms \nwealth was not used as an advantage, the local police chief said this case was bigger than rush limbaugh, . no \none had ever faced a federal charge for having prostituies in their own house. no violence coercion. etc \n191 the police released to the press, the raw statements of the girls. not one was ever questioned by opposing \ncounsel. ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032832.txt_14687
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032832.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the girls.? react to the fact that the case was settled but the lawyers wanted to trumpet their success."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think it's a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don't think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case--with it's Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "should i , or you reach out to matt. or sean. or ?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 1:34:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think you should reach out to Matt. Moonves' guy, who I had lunch with yesterday, says he would probably use Hiltzig."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.txt_14692
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.txt
subject: Re: trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "we called it"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "Yeah.\nOnce you asked me who I would like to see talking to Noam. Here is a guy! Can you arrange it? He could \nmake good use of Noam's advices."}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:37:59 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "I knew even before the primaries. Announced in meetings, lunches and dinners, just to receive a look of \ncontempt and disbelief \nNow I want my position as a political analyst (preferably in the White House)."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt_14698
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt
subject: Re: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 8:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:00 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\ni i\nMe tee mem ane nines nines hn iene mh mine meaner NR cis shy ish nin im a inom nm ce nine nei nee NSE RR OREM NN 3"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\n\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt_14699
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt
subject: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "View in browser\n\nPro Rata\n\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva -Feb 21, 2018\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops\nand tips at kia@axios.com or find me on Twitter at @imkialikethecar."}, {"sender": "Steven Sinofsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below...\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures\nfounder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing\n—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors\n\nthat she should get a male co-founder.\n\ne She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before\n\nremembering it's rooted in sexism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steven Sinofsky"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:55:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Thx for taking the time"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032273.txt_14706
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032273.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/7/2016 1:15:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2016, at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032417.txt_14710
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032417.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fair ..and you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Where?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Jan 9, 2017, at 4:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "are you coming to my coast anytime soon?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2017 5:10:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No plans ,but I will make some!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032267.txt_14712
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032267.txt
subject: Hi from London
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cecilia Steer ns", "recipients": ["JE gmail [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 9:58:45 PM", "subject": "Hi from London", "body": "Hi Jeffrey!\n\nI'm so sorry to hear about the Trump law suit. I wish there was something I could do. I always think of you.\nAll my love always,\n\nCecilia"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt_14714
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt
subject: Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Quora Digest [digest-noreply@quora.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/6/2019 8:06:22 AM", "subject": "Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\n\nTOP STORIES FOR YOU\n\nWhy do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?\n\nae\n\nJoe Crandall, lived in Compton, CA\n\nWhen gangs take new soldiers or gang members join a gang they are subjected to the ritual\n“Jumping In”. Jumping in members is like the final last part of a job interview, t...\n\nRead More »\n\nAS an aviation expert do you think that grounding of Boeing 737 MAX\nworldwide is an over reaction?\n\nre\n\nWayne Magor, Principal Software Engineer (Avionics)\n\nI do not consider the grounding to be an overreaction. There appears to be some kind of\nproblem with the aircraft. It is not normal to have 2 crashes within 5 months. Neith...\n\nRead More »"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032961.txt_14717
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032961.txt
subject: Re: Trump!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "ohno , you too/ I have been fielding similar emails calls texts ALL DAY, it will all turn out\n\nok. shaking things up will bring about hopefully positive change. . he won and his people won , this is\nwhat his people want. cant be sore losers."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "How are you explaining this to your Saudi friends? Can't believe logical people like Barrack would\n\nsupport such insanity."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "I gave him benefit of doubt on a whole bunch of stuff and agree that we need to shake things up. But\nthis ban is just wrong and I really don't see how it helps him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "1/29/2017 9:59:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "IT helps as he is seen to be keeping his word, it is importnat with putin and north korea. —_as you notice north\nkorea has not fired there missile that he promsied wouldnt happen. obama was never able to effecturate\nthat. . that being said Donald is fucking crazy I told you that"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031008.txt_14720
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031008.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael J. Pike"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:24:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032949.txt_14725
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032949.txt
subject: Re: Presidential inauguration
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Should I accept the invitation sent by Tom barrack"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Do you think it will be possible to shake hand with trump"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayern"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 11:29:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "1 561 655 7626 call to discuss if you are free"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "Jan 6, 2017, at 3:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "very many people going. it will be very crowded. but if you can meet some before or after in either wash or\nny, it might be worth it. . but unlikely"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031020.txt_14728
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031020.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower! Worked most of fight.\n\nLets plan rather to meet tmr.\n\nLets talk tmr.\n\nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun.\n\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:45:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "perfect"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032359.txt_14729
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032359.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:13:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties and meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with the Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you in Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033047.txt_14730
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033047.txt
subject: Re: Marilyn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arlme for the week you are in NY?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate \nBrianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should \nhave Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 11:58:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt_14731
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt
subject: your statement?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: your statement?", "body": "Ha, the sequel comment is great. But I don't think it's my place to discuss her accusations of other people...I know nothing about it and never met her or Clinton. \nThe points I can legitimately address are the nature of my involvement with you and some smoking gun allegations by the other girls. I will talk to a lawyer this \nweek. \nIt could really be fun if I made a viral video that showed how easily people can be fooled, followed by a statement saying the stories are obviously false. If it's fun, \ntabloids may cover it... \nBtw, I was invited to go to Davos...does not seem like such a good idea at the moment"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19, 2015 7:13 PM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort \n. She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her \nstory is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( \nclinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small \neven for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, \nshe was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime \nmininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island„ sex on a \nsmall airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the \nwindow during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent, but \nnow , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations\" is frankly silly. ok, to play \nalong I deny each and every allegation . The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have \nsex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031746.txt_14740
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031746.txt
subject: F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/9/2018 8:04:42 PM", "subject": "F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen", "body": "https: //ww.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/fbi-raids-office-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael -\ncohen. htm1?smid=p1-share"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030005.txt_14758
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030005.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon [nn"], "timestamp": "2/28/2018 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Ribis's Italian immigrant parents taught him to be tightfisted, but it was the Donald who introduced him to\ndealmaking. As a kid in the New Jersey suburbs, Ribis rose before dawn to count the empty soda bottles at the\nfamily deli \"so the suppliers couldn't cheat my mom on the deposits.\" When Trump faced bankruptcy in 1989,\nhe turned to the team of Ribis and Steve Bollenbach, now CEO of Hilton Hotels, to fend off the banks and\nbondholders. Ribis helped persuade creditors to let Trump keep his trophy holding: his casinos. It was the\ngaming company's IPO in 1995, orchestrated by Ribis, that restored Trump's wealth."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180.txt_14763
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "anasalrasheed@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying44"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :) \n\nonly you please"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table \nin new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you \nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Sep 21, 2017 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2017 3:40:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "for now.. i m leaving monday .. but all depends on my meeting with him. as far as i know, he will be there for \nanother week but i will know more sunday. i will make sure to keep you updated"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029232.txt_14764
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029232.txt
subject: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sullivan, John", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI’m John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I’ve been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein’s Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033053.txt_14766
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033053.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:02:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "not that i know of"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032785.txt_14771
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032785.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/18/2018 12:12:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried u. Am at 6178179452"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\n\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026450.txt_14780
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026450.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 3:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume no dinner"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 8:09:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033316.txt_14795
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033316.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "S", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/18/2018 8:17:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I like the confidence that Bob talked about it .... it’s a real lesson of how to be strong\n\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/04/transcript-phone-call-between-president-trump-journalist-\nbob-woodward/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7fb34bce85d22\n\nTranscript: Phone call between President\n\nTrump and journalist Bob Woodward\nAaron Blake\n\nPresident Trump and Bob Woodward discuss Woodward’s new book, “Fear,” before its\npublication. (The Washington Post)\n\nBob Woodward, an associate editor at The Washington Post, sought an interview with\n\nPresident Trump as he was writing “Fear,” a book about Trump’s presidency. Trump\ncalled Woodward in early August, after the manuscript had been completed, to say he\n\nwanted to participate.\n\nOver the course of 11-plus minutes, Trump repeatedly claimed his White House staff\n\nhadn’t informed him of Woodward’s interview request — despite also admitting Sen.\n\nLindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had told him Woodward wanted to talk. He also started the\nphone call by saying Woodward had “always been fair” to him, but by the end he said\nthe book would be “inaccurate.”\n\nThis is a transcript of that call, with key sections highlighted and annotated. To see an\nannotation, click on the yellow, highlighted text.\n\nTrump: Hello, Bob.\n\nBW: President Trump, how are you?\n\nTrump: How are you? How are you doing? Okay?\n\nBW: Real well. I’m turning on my tape recorder, with your permission.\nTrump: Oh, that’s okay. That’s okay. I don’t mind that at all.\n\nBW: I’m sorry we missed the opportunity to talk for the book.\n\nTrump: Well, I just spoke with Kellyanne [Conway] and she asked me if I gota call. I\nnever got a call. I never got a message. Who did you ask about speaking to me?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022673.txt_14800
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022673.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm'er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:26:02 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Attachments: image006.png; image007.png; image005.jpg; image010.jpg; image001.jpg; image003.jog; image008.png;\nimage004.jpg; image002.jpg; image009.png\n\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 12:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Plenty Of Innuendo, But No Hard Evidence Of New Clinton\nSex Scandal\n\nMuch-discussed documents in Jeffrey Epstein affair don’t live up to the hype.\n\nKen Bensinger\n\nBuzzFeed News Reporter\nShare\n\nTweet\nShare\nShare\nShare\nShare\nTweet\nShare\n\nShare"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt_14809
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you, but sleep is not going to be it. . I have read quite alot and frankly , the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights, just more questions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now becoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own ( yet )."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Appreciate consideration. I'm next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really like to do something (important) together. Just arrived in Beijing for the \"The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation\" (commentating), the second most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not paying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "May 9, 2017, at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "plant biology. ? great experiments being done. rarely looked at before. root communication. No , I have not lost my mind, . If done well , you would get lots of press. cutting edge technologys for optogenetics , experiments that dont require IRB approval. . its very exciting. do plants get an alzheimer equivalent placque, . als disease. parkinsons , yes it seems so. most cancer drugs are plant derivatives. / lots of fun . good luck in china"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/11/2017 5:38:37 AM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Ruminating (in Beijing traffic) on plant biology and ways to structure possible Closer To Truth (CTT) series to portray your sense and insights. For plant biology per se, there's probably three strong episodes, with higher production values needed to illustrate ideas/principles (more than the usual CTT talking heads). To fit the CTT framework (and audience expectation), these fascinating discoveries or hints of complex, multifarious mechanisms would need to be explored (even if not yet understood) in terms of simple, fundamental principles (applicable across disciplines - so-called 'general systems theory'). This potential series on plant biology could be extended to 5-6 episodes by including medicinals - plant derivatives that are, for some conditions, best treatments for numerous diseases. This could include, for example, a critical look at Chinese medicine. I think, though, there is a bigger idea lurking here. Your unique ways of thinking, exemplified by plant biology, encourages another, larger possibility for a significant CTT series. Each of the topics you've brought up, and many of your past fundings, sought kinds of breakthroughs or radically new ways of approaching reality and the knowledge and manipulation of reality. So, how about producing a big CTT series on just that - \"Radical Breakthroughs\"? I can imagine CTT episodes on each of the following kinds of topics you've mentioned, in which radical breakthroughs or deep structural significance are being appreciated: - Plant Biology - Deception (biology) - Power Laws (\"found everywhere in nature, Pareto, law of large numbers\") - New Math (\"category theory, membrane computing, as a new tool for cognition\") - Mathematics and Truth - Music (\"a tool to interogate the brain, not a product of but a lense into the inner software\") - Dreams (\"always on, consciousness blocking access, schizo have sleep disorders\") - Power (nature,as you said, \"financial, physical, intellectual, ability to do things in a local space\") I'm sure there are other such categories of 'radical breakthrough' - for example, several wild ideas in neuroscience, such as levels of information from sub-cellular to massive circuitry. We would clearly unify the topics and episodes with an overarching thematic vision of \"radical breakthroughs\" that \"challenge conventional wisdom\" (this phrase was an early Closer To Truth subtitle). Several of these topics can have more than one episode. We can easily produce 13 high-quality episodes and thus have a coherent full season on \"Radical Breakthroughs\", which would be distributed and marketed as such. Such an approach to \"Radical Breakthroughs\" is core CTT - in fact, I attempted this as part of the very first CTT series in 1999/2000 \"How do Breakthroughs Change Science\" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; child psychologist Rochel Gelman; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/how-do-breakthroughs-change-science  \"What are the Big Questions of Science?\" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; theoretical physicist Steve Koonin; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/what-are-the-big-questions-science  Though the production values of these early shows are much lower than our current version (since 2008), the content and contributors suggest how CTT can do a big new series - a full season of 13 episodes - on \"Radical Breakthroughs\". Appreciate specific direction, so that when we meet, I can be prepared Love to do something big and dramatic together. Robert"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt_14811
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt
subject: Re: thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never\nquestioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her\nname. however during the entire Ee time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me\nalmost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers jl She\nnever saw anything that MMMIclaims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends\netc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time\nasking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I\nhad promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has\nphotos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no\nsex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old\nnow and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their\nbest friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly\nlooked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8.\nanswered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to\n\n2\n\n60."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 2:54 PM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "I don't think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let's discuss. I have an idea about\nhow to best use. Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt_14812
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt
subject: trump interview with anderson cooper
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2015 7:39:58 PM", "subject": "trump interview with anderson cooper", "body": "he is a character..\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/22/trump_to_anderson_cooper_during_interview_the_people_do\nnt_trust_you_and_the_media.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026322.txt_14815
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026322.txt
subject: Re: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 6:05 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Hi Larry,\n\nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I’m glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman’s commitment to the project is impressive.\n\nI AM serious about working on this---it’s a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics\n\nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter’s favorite candidate ----- in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.\n\nBest wishes, Eric"}, {"sender": "4S", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument\n\nWhat about aspects not quite in model. More folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit.\n\nSeparately I pitched this to someone today.\n\nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. Is there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Eric", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "In fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere)."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt_14816
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black as Weingarten"], "timestamp": "5/23/2017 6:46:27 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Weingarten, a high-powered attorney at Steptoe & Johnson in Washington known for his folksy style, is a\nsomewhat unlikely choice because he has represented Democratic clients and is close friends with Eric H.\nHolder Jr., who served as attorney general under President Barack Obama. Holder and Weingarten met during\n\ntheir early years at the Justice Department.\n\nThe four finalists did not respond to requests for comment. A White House official said the administration had\n\nno comment"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.txt_14820
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.txt
subject: Re: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January\n15, 2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that\ncase if confirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n•\n•\n•\nR REPRINT OF THIS STORY\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein's victims' attorneys said\nTuesday.\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims's lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims.\nThe reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. \"BJay\" Pak, will\noversee the case for the government. Pak, a former Georgia lawmaker, was appointed Atlanta's chief federal\nprosecutor by President Trump in October 2017.\nThe Justice Department is still under a Friday deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims' attorneys in\nan effort to settle the case. On Feb. 22, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in Palm Beach ruled that federal\nprosecutors, under former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, broke the law when they concealed a plea\nagreement from more than 30 underage girls in Palm Beach who had been sexually abused by Epstein, a\nmultimillionaire New York hedge fund manager.\nMarra stopped short of voiding the agreement, which granted Epstein and an untold number of accomplices\nimmunity from federal prosecution for sex trafficking crimes, provided Epstein plead guilty to minor charges\nin state court. At the time of the plea deal, federal prosecutors had gathered enough evidence against Epstein to\nwrite a 53-page federal indictment, court records show.\nPlay Video\nDurationA\n12:20\nThe story behind a Palm Beach sex offender's remarkable deal\nThe story behind a Palm Beach sex offender's remarkable deal\nEmily Michot\nAn investigation by the Miami Herald, \"Perversion of Justice,\" found that after Acosta met privately with one\nof Epstein's lawyers, the government agreed to seal the plea agreement so that no one — not the victims, not\neven the state court judge who sentenced Epstein — would know the full extent of his crimes. Epstein, now 66,\nwas allowed to plead guilty to prostitution charges and served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail, where\nhe was given liberal work release, and allowed to travel to New York and his private island in the Caribbean\nduring his subsequent house arrest. He was released in 2009, and now divides his time between New York,\nPalm Beach and the U.S. Virgin Islands.\nThe Herald interviewed four of Epstein's victims, who were as young as 13 at the time they were abused by\nEpstein. They said they felt betrayed by state and federal prosecutors, who treated them like prostitutes instead\nof victims. Two of them sued the federal government in 2008 under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, which\ngrants crime victims the right to be informed about plea deals and to confer with prosecutors.\nMarra, in a 33-page opinion, said prosecutors not only intentionally violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act,\nbut they misled the girls into believing that the FBI's sex trafficking case against Epstein was ongoing —\nwhen, in fact, prosecutors had secretly closed it after sealing the plea bargain from the public record.\nMarra, noting that he reviewed affidavits, depositions and interrogatories, said \"Epstein worked in concert with\nothers to obtain minors not only for his own sexual gratification, but also for the sexual gratification of\nothers.\"\nThe victims' attorneys — Edwards, Scarola and Paul Cassell — have asked the Justice Department to throw\nout Epstein's plea agreement and reopen the criminal investigation.\nEdwards, who brought the victims' rights case against the government, said transferring the case to another\njurisdiction is a prudent decision.\n\"I think it's good that we're going to get fresh eyes and a fresh opinion on the way the case was handled,\"\nEdwards said Tuesday. \"We were obviously in an adversarial posture with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami\nbecause they handled the case to begin with.\"\nMiami's new U.S. Attorney, Ariana Fajardo Orshan — who was appointed by President Trump in September\n— did not respond to a request for comment.\nPlay Video\nDurationA\n5:29\nJeffrey Epstein apologizes, but not to his victims\nJeffrey Epstein apologizes, but not to his victims\nEmily Michot\nEdwards predicted that it would take some time for Pak's office to review the case, which includes more than\n500 docket entries and thousands of documents. He said If the sides can't agree on a resolution, then Marra\nwould likely have to come up with one. The case is being closely watched by crime victims' rights advocates,\nas it will likely set a precedent.\nAcosta, who was appointed by Trump as the U.S. secretary of labor in 2017, is the focus of a separate Justice\nDepartment investigation into whether there was any prosecutorial misconduct in the Epstein case. That probe,\nby the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility, was initiated in response to demands from a bipartisan\ngroup in Congress, led by Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman\nSchultz of Florida.\nIn the meantime, a court hearing will be held at 4 p.m. Wednesday in New York in another Epstein-related\ncase. A federal appeals court will hear oral arguments in a motion by the Miami Herald, supported by 32 other\nnews organizations, asking the court to unseal documents that could reveal details about the extent of Epstein's\ncrimes and any other people who may have been involved.\nThree of Epstein's former attorneys — who helped negotiate his plea deal in 2008 — wrote a letter published\nin the New York Times on Monday, defending the plea bargain cut with Acosta as a fair deal. The letter was in\nresponse to a Times editorial that called on Congress and the Trump administration to hold Acosta and others\ninvolved in the case accountable.\nEpstein's lawyers said the editorial's conclusions were \"in profound conflict with the reality,\" noting that there\nwas no evidence that Epstein committed federal sex trafficking offenses. The letter was signed by former\nEpstein lawyers Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger and Lilly Ann Sanchez, as well as Epstein's current attorney,\nMartin G. Weinberg.\nRead more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-\ngovernment/article227136459.html#storylink=cpy"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2019, at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:26:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033464.txt_14827
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033464.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric,, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033084.txt_14831
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033084.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http s ://www.the dailyb east. com/how-clo se-is-donal d-trump-to-a-p sychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not confidence inspiring\n\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Careful, or the pendulum is going to swing hard the other way and feminists will be in charge of everything"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i was kidding"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So was I, mostly. :-)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 4:15:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you at 2 , i ordered sushi for you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032752.txt_14834
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032752.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i vote:\n\nHow about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 10:54:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way...(still on for now, right?)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023237.txt_14837
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023237.txt
subject: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Leon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS__, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked\nfor are-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the\noutrageous incompetence in your family office .. Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by\nthe office (sic) that ..., BUT 1 was told by joslin,. , but I was told by . \" why is leon blaming me for ..\nI ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe ,\nhad remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your\noffice. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , you told me last week that the emotional\nreason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring\nthe benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email\n,where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance\ndebt ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and\nhave pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off ,\nso what if the categories are off. whats the big deal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the\ntough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im\nafraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Halperin, Alan S", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the\nlow end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Thomas Turrin Sl"], "timestamp": "Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:38 AM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "did you get the agent’"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler Lon ACTIN TT Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "grats 3,4,5,6, also need accounting documents and backup. year 2014. other info request to follow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@zmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "A couple of questions:\n\n1. Jeffrey-you saw the format in which we organized the back-up for year one of grat 1\n(quite thick/alot of back-up).\n\nDoes that format work (for you and internal use) or do you want it simplified/modified.\nLet's discuss.\n\n2. Since this will take the focus and effort of a lot of people (just to pull and organize\nthe various records...both legal and accting, I'd like to tell the staff that we are\nanswering an \"information request\" from the irs on the grats. It will generally be helpful"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025603.txt_14841
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025603.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems imasymbol for allills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . atleast for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Noproblem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <jito@mit.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:14", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "What is the size of the gift?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt_14845
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt
subject: contacts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/30/2016 4:40:14 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky, nathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain ,  demsaio, christakis, dennet,  sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman, seligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp , leahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed  mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, .    jagland, andrew,    woody blaine, boris, larry summers. \n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly  jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz.     raafat, sultan hamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro,   \n\nsmell menatlal fit, ,  lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein ,   diet excersicse    \n\nAK chad pinto lsj, bbj, ana brice, \\\n\n loen terjge\n\n bradk"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029583.txt_14846
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029583.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:48:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "One unusual thing about Powell’s appointment is that he is a lawyer, not an economist. From Yellen going back to Alan Greenspan, who started as chair in 1987, all Fed chairs have held a Ph.D. in economics. Alan Blinder, an economist at Princeton, has said that a doctorate has become more or less a prerequisite of the job—without one, he told Harvard Business Review, “the Fed’s staff will run technical rings around you.” While that remains to be seen, it is true that there are over 300 Ph.D. economists on the Fed’s staff, and Powell could end up needing to lean on their expertise more than a Fed chair with a doctorate in economics might."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "Can u get rid of Powell or really get rid of mnuchin"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 10:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "getting rid of powell much more important than syria /mattis. . I guess pompeo , only one left. . unless ambassador heather has a brilliant idea. - a first.. jared and ivanka, need to go. !!!"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "LMAO\n\nPerfect mnuchin hit"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work for Dillon, Read & Co!\n\nhe didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board. what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029597.txt_14851
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029597.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 12:06:18 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt_14852
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt
subject: Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "10/18/2016 8:20:31 PM", "subject": "Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube", "body": "Hysterical.\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029516.txt_14853
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029516.txt
subject: Donald Trump, Kanye West, and the diagnosis of Bipolar Disease
messages:
  [{"sender": "MARK TRAMO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/14/2018 5:16:21 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump, Kanye West, and the diagnosis of Bipolar Disease", "body": "Given your interest in Creativity: \nDid you see the entire Kanye West soliloquy in the Oval Office with Trump and Jim Brown? I am using that \nclip in my Talent & Creativity class when we discuss \"Creativity & Psychopathology.\" In Psychiatry, the formal \nterms that apply are \"flight of ideas,\" \"pressured speech,\" \"delusions of grandeur,\" and \"clang associations.\" A \ntruly great example of Hypomania. There's an interesting book on hypomania and success in America today."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032298.txt_14858
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032298.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "dimanche 25 septembre 2016 21:04", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im in paris all week, hope to see you and family"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline [Lang, Carlini a]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nWould you like to go with my father at the inauguration of the exhibition on Hergé, the father of « Tintin » , a\nhuge celebrity here, at le Grand Palais at 6.30 pm?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 12:11", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, great. how are you?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023545.txt_14863
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023545.txt
subject: Fwd: INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "CC [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2013 1:33:32 AM", "subject": "Fwd: INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 27, 2013, 2:55:10 PM EST", "subject": "INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Dear Mr. Jeffrey Epstein\n\nJared Kushner, New York's youngest powerhouse publisher, is celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the New\nYork Observer on Thursday, March 14th.\n\nMayor Michael Bloomberg will be by his side to toast you all.\n\nThe Observer is honoring those who have defined and shaped New York since 1987. They are celebrating the\ncities best, brightest and most influential in culture,media and finance. The salmon pink pages are revered\namong New York's elite as the preeminent voice on power.\n\nThe celebration is going to be one of those quintessential New York nights. We are looking forward to seeing\nyou.\n\nXOXO,\n\nPeggy\n\nJared Kushner, Publisher Joseph Meyer, CEO\n\nCory Booker Arthur Carter Georgina Chapman Katie Couric Lauren Santo Domingo\n\nLarry Gagosian Mariska Hargitay Carolina Herrera Katie Holmes Woody Johnson\n\nPeter Kaplan Comm. Ray Kelly Ken Kurson Matt Lauer Blake Lively Terry Lundgren\nPeter Martins Cynthia McFadden Sean Parker Ron O. Perelman Stephen Schwarzman\n\nLara Spencer Steve Tisch Donald Trump Ivanka Trump Harvey Weinstein George C. Wolfe"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt_14867
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
subject: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/5/2009 4:25:51 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:29 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Maxwell was not served. Wexner’s counsel accepted for him. Trump’s staff accepted for him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:22 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I will let you Know when bob confirms back with me.\nAlso, can u let me know if Wexner and Maxwell were actually personally served or if it was just someone at the location eligible to accept."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:04 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "We have a Motion to Stay re Ints and a Motion to Stay regarding Orders of May 22 and June 30."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt_14869
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [nicholasribis@nlrventures.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:28:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey — I told u weeks ago that Davis would issue a report critical of Leon and board read article in Post business page \nre Davis Report and Caesars — and DJT will be President -- Nick"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032746.txt_14872
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032746.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033458.txt_14875
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033458.txt
subject: Re: Great seeing you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel,\n\n1/5/10"}, {"sender": "Joel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for\ngolf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from\n\nCalifornia.\n\nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker\n800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but\nI may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a\n\nbargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to\n\npartner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he\nis looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest.\n\nLook forward to hearing from you.\n\nc\n\nJoel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:03 PM -0500", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel,, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the\ntrump course.. jerry you.. 1 will pick up all costs. thanks,,"}, {"sender": "i rot", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "have.him.call.me.or.better.eme.his.no.and.ill.set.sometgng.up.with.gerry.and.1...good.trip.to.ny.and.isle...joel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/6/2010 10:38:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "jack MR, aweckend when he could bring a friend would be appreciated"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023223.txt_14876
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023223.txt
subject: Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "especiaily as you seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc. however the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last days of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs , old stock sales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same ,topco midco.etc still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no care for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens audit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to discuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you left. asi said before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't work for me but works for you. . I tried.\n\nTransaction complete !\n\n. this - in spite of your collection of Elysium misfits. !!!\n\nWith Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his utter incompetence was brought front and center, he may be a step up from Eileen, but if he is , then it is not certainly not by much, . Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of details and mechanics. I was not shown one document re phaidon,- not one.. Brad wanted to keep it private between he and his so called\" advisors\" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is wholly ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - things I thought were a priority to get done after consulting with your office _ still remains virtually undone.\n\nIT, still desperately needed- reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off exercises , - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, consultants up the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told that i cannot even see the proposals received without brads specific authorization ) - brad has no idea even as to what questions to ask. he knows little of finance, is run roughshod over by almost everyone in the office. he is a little man , using your power, to appear larger . Eileen was self aware enough to know she was over her head , that is a huge difference. bad info is rampant ie 3 million in deductions Im told are taken for art space but on closer examination it turns out they cannot be used at all. (ZERO benefit ) though you will be told yes they were deducted on the return they said that is the question they get asked ! \" were they deducted \"not -\" is there a benefit\" !!| I asked for the balance sheet and P and L for Regan arts , a basic first step in order to check your financials. \"sorry we never got one?\" though 9.8 million invested, no p&l, nothing , a construction project run amok , no budget, the coo fired after only 3 months. , no clue. I can add that artspace financials are also a total mess.\n\nAs your friend and in order toturn the page. I will try to be constructive\n\nThe following is a list of things I think would be in your interest to get done asap .but definitely not by\n\nme.\n\nisuggest you form new grats. , hire a high level tax partner. use your trading accounts as they remain the paramount requirement 16 months after i emailed to you their importance. , I suggest you consider having the 49percent of phaidon merged into artspance and have Richard buy artspace. re-do bank\n\nloans. no need to pay interest at higher rates on boat or plane. . as Richard is now no longer trustee. re-\ndo will, make suydam executor , with Barry, and john as back up. pay | million a year for executor role.\nget rid of Judy Black trust, deal with gifts and their tax returns, . review amounts to kids at fixed ages. put\nmore protections in for Alex and Victoria. , distribute some money to kids let them make decisions. ,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030721.txt_14878
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030721.txt
subject: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 8:08:37 AM", "subject": "How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033090.txt_14879
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033090.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "4/18/2018 4:53:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/us/politics/trump-stormy-daniels-sketch.html?mabReward=ART CBl&recid=13Q5G7HYxXozluDDlYliddYajNS&recp=1&moduleDetail=recommendations-l&action=click&contentCollection=Asia%20Pacific&region=Footer&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&src=recg&pgtype=article"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt_14888
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt
subject: Re: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number | should reach.\n\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or\nanything of the kind.\n\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already\nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\n\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great\nartists when they need it.\n\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source.\n\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet,\nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in\nperson."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Caroline Lang", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant Si"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 6:37:32 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt_14894
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt
subject: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [a", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JJEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:19:56 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!!\nhttps: //bossip. com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-\nher-pornographic-p]leasure-pocket-43081/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt_14895
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt
subject: from revival. a new book..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley <a"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 15 2010 07:13 PM", "subject": "from revival. a new book..", "body": "I thought you might find this amusing. \"But more often then not, the team of economic advisers was\noperating from different playbooks, with Summers calling his plays the loudest. Take, for instance, the debate\nthat surrounded the Volcker rule -- the regulatory reform component that curtailed proprietary trading at U.S.\nbanks and limited their investments in private equity firms and hedge funds. As Wolffe reports:\n\n[Summers'] doubts sat there in the West Wing, blocking the Volcker rule for months. Obama had\nsignaled that he wanted the rule to move forward back in October. The banks were on safe ground again,\nbut could still benefit from subsidized lending by the federal government. That seemed wrong when they\ncould use the money to trade for themselves rather than lend it to customers in the real economy... Biden\nwas an old friend of Volcker's and started to press for the rule to take force. But as the weeks dragged on,\nSummers rehashed his same old questions and concerns. At one fall meeting with his economics team in\nthe Oval Office, Obama wanted to know why nothing had moved yet. Summers dug in once again, while\nGeithner - whose media coverage cast him as a supposed ally of Wall Street - wanted to push ahead.\n\nObama noted dryly, \"I think I can argue everyone's position now. \"\n\nHis 2fe 2s 2fe 2s 2s 24s ois 2fe 2s 2s fs of 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe of 2s 2c ois 2fe ois fe ois fe ofc ois 2fe ois fe fs fe oie ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s fe fe ois 2fe ois 2fe ois fe 2c ois 2s ok oie ois oie 2s ois 2k 2k"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt_14897
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt
subject: Capital Market Outlook
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Mors", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/2/2019 4:24:45 PM", "subject": "Capital Market Outlook", "body": "Capital Market Outlook from our Chief Investment Office delivers a balanced mix of macroeconomic insights and global market views, with in-depth analysis from the CIO's investment strategists and analysts. It offers timely commentary that can help you navigate markets and take advantage of emerging trends across the globe.\n\nThis week's topics are:\n\ne Macro Strategy: Why 2%? — While Federal Reserve policy has always been focused on the goal of price stability, the specific meaning of price stability has been refined over the years from a general and non-specified, vague concept to the current very specific quantitative definition of a 2% long-run average for the personal consumption expenditures deflator. We describe the evolution and rationale for the more specific target.\n\n° Global Market View: Global R&D: From Apollo, to Apple, to Alibaba? — The recent unfolding tech cold war between the U.S. and China will likely only accelerate the pace of spending on global research and development as the two parties vie for technological supremacy. China faces significant technological hurdles, while the U.S. needs to rethink and rebalance the role of public and private sector research and development spending.\n\n° Thought of the Week: A Golden Diversifier — Gold’s recent outperformance versus the U.S. dollar has potentially triggered a bullish technical pattern. In our"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032307.txt_14903
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032307.txt
subject: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joe Palazzolo", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": "Hi, Michael.\n\nI'm writing about the Jane Doe case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Can I talk to you briefly? Story is likely\ngoing online in the next couple hours. Apologies for the short notice. I wanted to get a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein.\n\nThanks and best,\n\nJoe"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt_14904
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 1:29:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you think you will be in new york?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt_14913
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt
subject: Questions for article
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 5:22:16 AM", "subject": "Questions for article", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHuffington Post is almost done with their article. They need couple answers to use them for your quotes. Please \nsee below. \nQuestions for you: \n1. As a result of Trump's budget cuts, more scientists are turning to private donors for funds. How have you \nhelped these scientists thrive during this time in particular? \n2. Why do you think it's important to have funded the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics and how will this \nprogram help us in the future? \nQuestions for a scientist (can I ask Martin to answer and quote him)? \n1. How has Jeffery Epstein's donations helped you advance your research? \nLet me know if you have any questions or comments. Would appreciate speedy response. \nThank you!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025944.txt_14924
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025944.txt
subject: Fwd: Research App
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz [asmoskowitz@optonline.net]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 2:25:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Research App", "body": "This is what my son Aaron developed. Read below from David Hayes at the Mayo Clinic. How do I get David's email to Biden? Thanks"}, {"sender": "Hayes, David L., M.D.", "recipients": ["Bruce Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "June 30, 2016 at 8:57:26 AM EDT", "subject": "Research App", "body": "Bruce — thought of you when watching the evening news yesterday. Joe Biden was being interviewed about his work on “Cancer Moonshot” or something like that. He said that they were working on or planned to work on a database/app that has never before been done, that would allow a patient or a physician to see who was doing research on a specific tumor anywhere in the world.\n\nYou’ve already got it. You have connections everywhere, you should get to Biden on that work group.\n\nDavid"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021690.txt_14925
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021690.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/04/2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami @", "recipients": ["Criminal tnvDiigative"], "timestamp": "03/04/2011", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/04/2011", "body": "LEAD (s) :\nSet Lead 1: (Action)\nCRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE\nAT WASHINGTON, DC\n\nCAC Unit is requested to coordinate and obtain appropriate\napprovals for proposed international travel of the listed Miami\npersonnel.\n\nSet Lead 2: (Action)\n[| i.\nb7C\nee\nis requested to obtain concurrence from the\nin obtaining country clearance for the travel\nfa) e liste lami personnel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt_14934
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:3T", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle 0 some of the mess at the\nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and\nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy\nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023198.txt_14939
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023198.txt
subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it would \ntake us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I taped \nWoody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances? \nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:23:18 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt_14943
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect I am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:51:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt_14946
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt
subject:
  I did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2018 5:29:23 PM", "subject": "I did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5316779/Haley-denies-disgusting-rumors-affair-Trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022934.txt_14954
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022934.txt
subject: Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks\nMarty"}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 4/21/15", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt_14957
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt
subject: Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg EE", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg\n\nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\n\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\n\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\n\nThanks for your consideration.\n\nFoxNews.com"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026838.txt_14960
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026838.txt
subject: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\n\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments we submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday or Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24\" February its worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr. Wade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\n\nMany thanks and best regards.\n\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "In light of the trend toward democracy in Africa as exemplified by Nigeria and Guinea, it is very concerning that one of the United States’ closest allies and Africa's strongest democracies appears to be retrogressing. The destabilization of democracy in Senegal could have significant consequences in the entire region. The United States must get in front of this negative trend before spreads across Africa and it is too late. The U.S. should call for President Sall to honor the request of the UN Working Group and release his political rival Mr. Wade and also keep his pledge of a 5 year presidential mandate. President Obama has said that Africa is more important than ever to security and prosperity in the U.S. We have worked very hard in implementing and prioritizing democracy and democratic succession in Africa. The Obama administration must not let our hard work be compromised in Senegal, we have worked too hard and come too far."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt_14968
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers, no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which i believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times. two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:32:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033127.txt_14969
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033127.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018, at 6:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "now?"}, {"sender": "LHS [glhsummers]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018 at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "830 or so???"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS [glhsummers]"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018, at 9:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Tomorrow"}, {"sender": "LHS [glhsummers]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number should I call in 10"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:46:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "By age 3, Mr. Trump was earning $200,000 a year in today's dollars from his father's empire. He was a millionaire by age 8."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt_14973
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 9:58:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "paris be back the 5th for a few days we can do it then"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Have to go to a funeral of an old relative in NJ. Won't be back into city until 3:30 or 4:00. Or what's your weekend look like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, February 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt_14974
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The Science of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt.\n\nIll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 6:02:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When to meet? Weekend OK."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt_14979
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't tweet this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigative journalism so does your suggested pr group have the better contacts to place a story. on why itis not. . howeer to you point. to what end?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it legs--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think about it."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution. sex formoney. . a state crime. with state laws."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At this point I don’t think you can go legalistic. They’ve won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im aware. im thinking what would trump do"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He never tries to explain. He denies, blames media, denigrates someone else."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Claims are ludicrous and self-serving, media is working with the other side’s lawyers, this is all about Donald Trump."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/1/2018 3:57:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "...all about Donald Trump, the real villain."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt_14991
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt
subject: Re: Jed Rubenfeld
messages:
  [{"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Good morning!\nJed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend's unhappy situation? If so, happy to make the connection.\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Can you talk? Impt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above the law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely to\ngive king like powers to a president. on one above the law. I would like lunch pail joe to come away and\nthink, this guy is smart . I understood. lets see what he writes about the clintons.\nsomeone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose a vote, that is true , but\nwould make little sense for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the allowed civil depo setting\nprecedent for criminal process , is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down, again, and suggesting\nthat you can sue your neighbor, even if you neighbor is the president. makes little sense that the you can be\nindicted for assaulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . at\nsome point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you were that the clinton and betty curries'\ntrashcan story, was reopened. ."}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 7:17:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Wise counsel. Thx!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026242.txt_15000
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026242.txt
subject: You are in the book... .
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 3:04:23 PM", "subject": "You are in the book... .", "body": "I read the first half of it last night -- there are a few paragraphs on you TB, DJT partying around NYC\nin 90s etc -- and then MW says you are airbrushed out of DJT history while Barrack sticks around."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt_15010
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt
subject: Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/5/2017 12:02:43 PM", "subject": "Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-\nclient-trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031815.txt_15011
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031815.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: _ the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kah"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, itis sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of arank amatuer.. youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it hit the traget , you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your gradeisanF. notone goodmoveinmany. ._ re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , thisisno way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could. would.. Had youtold me, jeffrey Id like to try a new job asa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023419.txt_15013
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023419.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns,\ngordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres ,\nhardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn (\nharvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you\ngoing to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be\nhere all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk\nfreely."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , 1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in\nroom 1, gunshot in surgery, and the\n\n\"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories,\nhowever. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt_15019
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt
subject: Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2018 4:59:21 PM", "subject": "Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn", "body": "https://ww.cnbc.com/2018/03/14/trump-to-name-larry-kudlow-as-gary-cohn-replacement.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026256.txt_15024
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026256.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 118 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "coin issues. : receive coins. distribute coins, pay in coins. coin cooperative. prohibitions foreign donor.? 1 need to understand flow of funds.. donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it have to go there at all etc."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a confession privelege. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:21:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Populist/Nationalist first\n\nConservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next\nReverse alabama\n\nThis coalition staves off \"times up\" for next decade plus"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt_15033
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 3:01:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": "Attachments: Epstein combined articles.pdf\n\nForwarded message"}, {"sender": "Public Records/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "F.", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": "Forwarded by Public Records/PalmBeach on 02/24/2010 05:53AM"}, {"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Joyce"], "timestamp": "08/12/2008 09:33PM", "subject": "Epstein News Articles", "body": "I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file), some background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.\n\nRegards,\nMike\n\n(See attached file: Epstein combined articles.pdf)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt_15050
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:18:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt_15055
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt
subject: Ri did see this coming...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on.... \nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible... \nWill you have a cabinet position? \nHow are you? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 7:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "How's that? \nWhich team you pulling for? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 1:53:35 PM", "subject": "Ri did see this coming...", "body": "And just had a great time with Joi. \nYou still in Paris? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023343.txt_15056
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023343.txt
subject: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email ,where i remind you that I am not\nyour bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance dept ??!!) that it should be redone .I\nhave reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and have pointed out the continued numerous\ninaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off , so what if the categories are off. whats the big\ndeal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the tough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts (\nhigh) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im afraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be\nback from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Alan", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the low\nend. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel as", "Leon"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and\nyou and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing\nthe things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be\nhelpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per\nyear. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. _, planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n. I wrote itto you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , as arule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with"}]


