# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt_16314
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 123 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "haddadfm@aol.com"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names i and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nfurther has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact\ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is lpm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\n\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\n\nPh:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt_16321
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt
subject: Re: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 7:38:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "- ask him for a financial proposal. Subject to \nMutually acceptable conditions"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Unsatisfactory"}, {"sender": "\"Immelt, Stephen J.\"", "recipients": ["\"Kathy Ruemmler\""], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST", "subject": "RE: Follow up", "body": "Kathy \n\nWe will of course do this in whatever sequence makes sense for you. It goes without saying that any move \nwould need to make economic sense. My assumption has been that your comp would fall outside of our \"bell \ncurve\", but that is not an issue for us as long as the potential contribution also falls outside. You would not be \nthe only partner outside the curve, and I am comfortable with expanding that group for people who can \ngenuinely move the needle while embracing the culture that makes us who we are. \n\nOne benefit of having Michael in the mix is that he can provide a global perspective, and he would be \nimportant for explaining the case outside the US if we moved forward. \n\nJust let me know when and how you want to speak next. \n\nBest, \nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve, \n\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more \nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, \nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition \nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed. \n\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump! \n\nBest, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy \n\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up \nan opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International \nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish \nupbringing. \n\nLet me know. \n\nBest, \nSteve"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt_16322
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy_________________________into on you and Trump. Because of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it\n-- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <_______________________", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK\nbecause after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for me\neither way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:59:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Pass on midelfart wealthiest girl in Norway"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012632.txt_16323
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012632.txt
subject: Conference Call with Bert Ocariz
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "some serious concern.\n1. Can we get a copy of the indictment (or can you tell me the nature of the crimes against the girls)?\nCertainly he should not get a copy of any indictment.\n\n2. When will it be possible to see the plea agreement so that we understand exactly what Epstein concedes to in the\ncivil case?\n\nI don't think he should get the plea agreement either.\n3. Is there any cap or other limitation on attorney's fees that the defendant will pay in the civil case?\nI can’t imagine he would be entitled to anything other than an hourly fee.\n\n4. What is the contemplated procedure for, and timing of, the payment of attorney's fees and costs?\n\nIn any event, I need to consider these issues carefully and I cannot agree to any of these issues before we speak. I\nwould suggest we plan on talking tomorrow at 12 pm if you are available."}, {"sender": "\"Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/27/2007 10:51 AM AST", "subject": "Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "Hi Jay — Bert's firm has raised a number of good questions about how they are going to get paid\nand setting up a procedure that avoids any conflict of interest with their clients. Are you around\ntoday to do a conference call? Let me know what times work for you because Bert wants to get\ntheir conflicts counsel on the call with us.\n\nThese are some of the questions he sent to me. I told Bert that as part of our agreement we (the\nfederal government) are not going to indict Mr. Epstein, but gave him an idea of the charges that\nwe had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255. With respect to question 2, do I have your\npermission to send Bert just that section of the plea agreement that applies to the damages claims\n(I would recommend sending paragraphs 7 through 10, or at least 7 and 8)? Can you talk with\nyour client about items 3 and 4? I envisioned Shook Hardy sending regular bills to you, with\nany privileged information redacted, and being paid like every other client pays the bills."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt_16326
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt
subject: Re: Trump Soho
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/17/2009 5:54:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "I spoke to henri and bob, henri tried hard to bullshit me, telling me he had talked to the studios and felt comfortable he could raise over 100 million in guaranteed distribution, I checked, and of course, it turned out to be smoke. I like bob, and would have hope your friend would have more respect for. him. I will look in to trump."}, {"sender": "<=11IM11.11>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "Just heard from an insider that they will probably go into foreclosure ...the deal is done and dead... .building is complete ready to open in Feb\nOnly 30%/ 35% sold...hardly any can actually close.\nNot sure if this is interesting..., can have you talk to the developer (Sapir)\nHope all is well...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019407.txt_16328
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019407.txt
subject: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:40:35 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 10:39 AM CST", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Alexandra, \nI have not been able to respond to your questions because Mr. Epstein is traveling. \nBut if you plan to make any factual assertions about him in your article, I hope you will run the facts \nby me, as you said yesterday you would do. \nMr. Epstein has been the subject of many inaccurate and misleading articles, and I am sure Newsweek would \nnot want to make such a mistake or worse, libel him. \nBest, \nJay"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, \nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on \nthe phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he \ncould tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the \ninformation I already have by you or him. \nThank you, \nAlexandra \n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? \nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference? \n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the \nsame clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion? \n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising? \n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? \n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? \n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? \n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why? \n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive? \n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe, \nI understand you have some questions about my client, \nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage \nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some \ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you \nsend me any factual questions so that I can provide you \nwith accurate responses. \nI am also available to speak with you. My number is \nThank you, \nJay"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt_16330
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt
subject: Re: boosting strategy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Myster\n\nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/\n\nNew York Magazine\n\nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite\nGhislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ...\n\n3. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes\n\ncs\nLA\n\nwww.forbes.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-bil...\n\nForbes\n\nby Clare O'Connor - in 144 Google+ circles\n\nFeb 28, 2011 - Palm Beach pervert Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news today, thanks to a series of\nstories in the UK's Daily Mail linking the convicted pedophile ...\n\n4, Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy: Overview\n\nwww .jeffreyepstein.org/\nJeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports innovative research and programs in science, medicine, education and\ninternational affairs."}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "2/8/2014 1:32:58 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we\ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have\nbeen.\n\nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate\nURLs per our call\n\nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on\na few top sites at no cost moving forward\n\nlam available for a call now or this weekend to review."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt_16342
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 10:25:34 AM", "subject": null, "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he\nwas sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt_16347
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["oi aT"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 11:46:21 AM", "subject": null, "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence.\ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech.\ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years.\n\nthe cinese are willing to build a new\nif he were to call it the obama xi"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt_16348
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm so sorry this happened to you. It's terrible. And sad."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt_16352
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "On 15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i stepped away from the royal jet. if you want to go after the bbj"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "| just got my G550 - 5176 under contract at $18.5 and it's going to Pre-Purchase inspection on Monday.\nI'm aware that G550 - 5109 was under contract for $17,600,000.\n\nAs a company we have 5 G550, 2 G650 and 1 BBJ buyers.\n\nThat is all | know for now."}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadich"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:28:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new , friend asked yesterday. . one in virginia. paid 8. fixed up with 300k . asking 10"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt_16353
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:18:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt_16354
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:56:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from\n\nok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here..\nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution\n\nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt_16366
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "al taylor , pr former jerry springer. producer"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:45:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "crazy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.txt_16370
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.txt
subject: Re: boosting strategy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.\n\nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)\n\nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the \"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated first page."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\n\nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon."}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing now).\n\nMr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. Iam also available to discuss this at your convenience today or over weekend."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt_16380
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties \nand meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with \nthe Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you \nin Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When marrahesh ? Is it definite"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 11:00:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes around 22nd."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt_16389
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt
subject: Re: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:13 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in\nfact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt_16391
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:48:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hey Jeffrey!! \nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not? \nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling \nto NY often to see him and can catch up with you.. \nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-)\nHugs,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026975.txt_16400
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026975.txt
subject: The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’Ancona In Conversation
messages:
  [{"sender": "How To Academy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/13/2019 10:17:44 AM", "subject": "The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’Ancona In Conversation", "body": "The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’ Ancona In Conversation\n\nMICHAEL WOLFF\n\nBuy Tickets"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025835.txt_16401
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025835.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt_16410
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Tm good. Good luck!\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "1can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:14", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "What is the size of the gift?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:25", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "100-200"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <a>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 01:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt_16415
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt
subject: Screen shot
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2010 9:01:17 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "This is a screen shot of a google search on your name taken about one minute ago, and this is BEFORE the next big sweep. I UNDERSTAND your point about \"one thing kills me,\" but the daily beast article is gone, the other ones, including the powerful Huffington Post, are about to be pushed off. And, out stuff is on top."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt_16417
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:49:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt_16424
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:33 AM -0500", "subject": "Re:", "body": "2? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day.\nIt includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew\nMcCabe; Comey's chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who\nwas booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI's personnel div. laufman and\nrachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhsummers@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon't follow your note. What texts"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:23:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "page and strokz"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt_16425
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stephen Hanson"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:15:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032757.txt_16429
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032757.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am | seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid TE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.txt_16430
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with\nyour consent of course. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime,\nhowever , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and\noverseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction had even begun, had already\nbeen heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re only paying 20 m has frankly , left\nme felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or Rothschild transaction.\n\nyou've agreed that\n\nYour office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their\nfinancial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad\ndocument after another for over a year , no getting away from it,, badcash flows nonewIT, each\ntime with \" its gettting better\" no in fact -! itsnot. - the excuse, that Brad is not the numbers guy, is\nludicrous. of course he didnt actually prepare the statements. - no ceo would ,- but over and over he\npresented them to you and me, after , holding them back for his personal review multiple times and after\nmultiple drafts. weeks of his editing, the consistant but \"inexplicable \"missing the obvious serious\nerrors .( gaming ) inaccuracies, ( cashflow ) and mistakes (tax returns). why, ?! the simple answer is\nthat at best, he is ac minus, (note. I, like you ,also give points for effort. )-! an elegant art partnership\ngone fallow. ??!!I and its core reason to exist. not used ? no docs for plane?, still ! why? no docs for\ndecantings why? the docs for deal | received last night , \"no docs at all for deal 2, the biggest \". why\nwasn't Tom brought in, after 4 times of my incessant reminders i spoke to him, he knows little of either\ntransaction except for over view. never saw pahidon anything except projections until yesterday ? ?and\nthis after your clear admonition etc. re the trading accounts no activity, at all,\n\nBarry Cohen is great. more like him please .\nyou asked ,- I did my best trying to train your brad chosen people in the face of my telling you that they\nwere never going to be more than c-minuses, thousands of emails thousands? Brad at its head . you\ncan't as aceo, have an accountant give you multiple pages with the most important numbers missing\naltogether and not notice, you and I saw the errrors right away ,as did my very junior bookeeper after\nonly a cursory glance. He told me he didnt know the details of his note? ! , my guess is that he wanted to\npay less. no more than that, any other story is blather. its silly. Talk to richard yourself.\nre your estate. Yes another Brad issue - your will, needs revision. the tenants in common structure I\nassume Alan has carefully walked you through. it is way overdue, needed and exciting. I won't list the\nmore serious issues in an email but we can speak over the weekend.\n\nHow can I help? We agreed at the time when you hired Castrucci , that when you fired him, I would\nbear no responsibility because it was clear that he shouldnt be hired. brad and you both said ,\" its on us\",\nbut... the equivalent of your art consultant pointing to a picasso and calling ita renoir. then a brancusi\nand calling it a michaelangelo. those were the types of erros that 1 saw immediatily, you said give them\nmore time. at least they saw it was a painting and not a photo?\n\nbeing weaned of our biz /pay realtionship has been our mutual goal. However since novemebr, you\nchose to do so by ignoring’ our agreement re, phaidon,and your oft stated commitment to me of large\npayments for large value, (37 percent was our number ). chose to pay me anumber picked by what\nappears to be only by whim,- have yet to justify it except for telling me that you and Brad Karp talked.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023226.txt_16436
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023226.txt
subject: Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "1 did the paul weiss bill get paid ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today important\n\n10m paid today to gratitude america, a 501 c 3, willl make last year complete. 20 million paid today ftc . 10 million july 15 5 million sept 30. , 5 million jan 1 for all of 16. tax savings paid at 37 percent . of net. savings. 50 million credit. net. so 150 million free. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "Transaction complete !\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times that i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I preferred to have no financial interactions. I dont have many friends and didnt want money to interefer with our unique relationship. For five years you had the kind but goofy Eileen Alexandersson managing your accounting , legal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she was incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad Wechsler , there is no \" both sides. \". IT have consistantly maintained since day one that he was highly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him a postion to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying instead you should pay up and get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me was tasked with hiring new people and as you wanted him to take ownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews. you may recall that as late as may, you told him in my presence that he had had six months and had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in sales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions. ,( last nov ) 11 million found in dormant accounts and 4 million in the drawer. errors in cash flow both personal and Phaidon. Oversight on new grats first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consulatation were resolved only as aresult of my intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished.\n\nWith Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his total and utter incompetence was brought clearly , front and center. He may be a step up from Eileen, but, if he is , then itis certainly not by much, A major difference is that Eileen knew she was over her head. Brad struts his stupiditly whenever he gets a chance.\n\nA critical example. - Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of care and attention to details and mechanics. with regard Phaidon I was not shown one single document , not one.!! Brad wanted to keep it private between he, and his so called\" advisors\" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is totally ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - of things I thought were a priority to get done - _ still remains in the whole unresolved.\n\nThe IT, is virtually untouched and is still in desperate need of a format - reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off exercises , when either you or brad ask for it - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, ,consultants up the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told by Brad not to share the outside proposals with me - brad has no"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt_16441
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:58:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt_16442
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 10:51:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ?? \nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he's got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant \nlondon. fun \nalso going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich \nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt_16444
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk /reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy shit im on] for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 11:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026620.txt_16448
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026620.txt
subject: FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Allen West", "Rafael Bardaji", "Philip Kafka", "Lisa Albert [LA@unknown.com]", "Janet Kafka", "James Ramsey", "ACT for America", "John Zouzelka-Cell", "Joel Dunn", "Nate McClain", "Neil Anderson", "Henry Hortenstine", "Bennett Schmidt", "Marcie Brown", "Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Michael Stechel", "Buchholtz", "Michael Horowitz", "Bennett Greenwald", "Uri Fouzailov", "Rita Hortenstine", "Forrest Miller", "Val Sherman", "Mark Epstein", "Taal Safdie", "Nate White", "Gary Gross", "Marshall Funk", "Michael"], "timestamp": "8/4/2015 10:23:22 PM", "subject": "Fw: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Please spend 2 minutes and watch this dennis prager video on iran deal. And then forward it if you agree. If not, I understand and just delete. Respectfully, terry"}, {"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:00:42 +0000", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, August 03, 2015 7:16 PM", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Dear Friends, PLEASE watch this very important short and incredibly clear video regarding the Iran deal. If you have not yet called your congressmen and asked other friends and relatives to do so, PLEASE do that as well. The wellbeing of your children and grandchildren depend upon it! Mike"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt_16453
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt
subject: Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lonnie Martin", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "January 16, 2019 at 6:50:44 AM PST", "subject": "Re: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": "Hi Paul. \n\nThanks so much for sharing both your note to Steven and your latest Manson essay with me. It's always wild to read that piece. I have parts of it memorized at this point. \n\nAfter reading your comment about vibes from the movie, I feel like I have some explaining to do. This is all stream of consciousness writing so take it on merit, I guess. No harm is meant. \n\nAs 'The Last of the Manson Girls' got closer to completion, I was insanely nervous about showing it to you. I knew it there was very little in it that was \"Truth\" in terms of minute details. What I did was take the broad strokes of your essay and make it into the \"beats\" of my story. \n\nFor example, Sandy's invitation to take a bath formed the spine of the \"mermaid\" scene. Squeaky's line, \"Manson never took anybody who wasn't already discarded by the society\" formed the spin of the animated fever dream where she talks about her father. The visit to Merrick was a good place to get into some of my views about conspiracy and the human mind's ability to latch on to anything to avoid unpleasant facts. Squeaky's line \"Well what do you expect from me. I'm crazy\" was obviously later then this meeting, but it was just too good a line to let go. I didn't use elements of your essay that made actual filming and production tougher. For example, the interlude in your essay where you went to a home of friend of the family and smoked weed for example became \"you\" smoking weed at their pad. \n\nI added in beats, character traits and dialgoue that helped form that \"dramatic arc\" that works in movies so well. You and the Manson Women must have talked about far more than you mentioned in your essay, but I took liberties with what was said and how it was presented. Maybe I should have reached out to you about these conversations. I guess I was afraid of the Truth getting in the way of a good story. \n\nAll the Mae Brussel stuff is there because its seemed a simple (Ha!) way to explain to the audience \"Why is Paul going there?\" Squeaky asking for the LSD rather than you bringing it was, again, an easy and short way to explain to the audience why LSD was involved. \n\nThere's a lot of my personal experience in the film. I *did* have a panic attack while on LSD and passed out hugging a toilet. (I didn't however go to a desert/beach and talk to futuristic Squeaky Fromme, though I was in the desert when it happened.) I once had a very contentious creative friendship with one of my best friends who is a friend no longer. That seemed to mirror some of your relationship with Lenny Bruce. I also felt like your relationship with Lenny had so much to do with your evolution as a writer, satirist, and comedian that it seemed proper to put that in there. I wrestled a *long* time over even mentioning your daughter because it seemed more of a personal invasion than you had bargained for. However, based on your memoir, it was obvious how important that relationship and aspect of your life was to you. \n\nThe smooching with Squeaky isn't meant to be any kind of bawdy Enquirer scandal. It's tied to the idea that by the end of the movie this \"Paul\" isn't scared of her. The kiss is mentioned as being symbolic of acceptance and despite all their philosophical differences, \"Paul\" and Squeaky in the film find a way to \"accept\" each other. \"We've got a find a way to love the people we hate.\" is the statement I always say at talkbacks when people ask me what the ending of the movie means. \n\nThe movie was conceived and made as a response to my own feelings of doubt about myself, and my growing social irrevelavance as I age. (I turned 40 while making it.) It's about coming to terms with the mistakes I've made and the hubris that caused them. \n\nIt's also about resistance fatigue. It asks (in a roundabout way), \"What happens if the good guys *do* lose the war?\" I saw similarities between how the protest wing of the counterculture may have felt in the wake of RFK, the Weathermen and the SLA, and having the whole movement for something bigger start to go sour as it mainstreamed. The similarities between Nixon and Trump are so obvious, I feel like I don't even need to mention them. I saw similarities in your spiritual journey to mine. \"Paul Krassner\" in my script was in some ways a vessel to project all my own hang-ups onto. I suppose that's an unfair burden to put on you. \n\nI don't know if this all sounds like excuse-making, but it's my way of saying that I certainly don't want to \"break a legacy.\" I think the work you did with \"The Realist\" is important and paved the way for the Onion, The Daily Show, and society's general acceptance of raw, cutting satire in the world of politics and journalism. The last thing I would ever want to do is have that be tainted. Film has that power of course. The medium by it's nature hypnotizes, and has a funny way of clouding up the truth. Fiction becomes history and vice versa. \n\nMore than anything, I don't want you to feel taken advantage of or disrespected. \n\nI probably should have explained this to you earlier. I probably should have called and had a conversation with you about it, and I'm happy to still do that. \n\nThank you again or allowing me to tell this story, even through my own distorted lens. \n\nAll the best, \nLonnie"}, {"sender": "paul krassner [paulkrassner@roadrunner.com]", "recipients": ["Nancy Cain", "Tom", "Steven Gaydos", "George Krassner", "Holly Krassner Dawson", "Marie Moneysmith", "Linda W. Grossman", "Daniel Dawson", "Danny Goldberg Caryl Ratner", "Kevin Bright", "Michael Simmons", "Samuel Leff", "Bob Fass", "Lynnie Tofte Fass", "Lee Quarnstrom", "Barb Cowles"], "timestamp": "1/16/2019 7:50:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt_16460
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:12:21 PM", "subject": null, "body": "see video at the bottom of the page as someone at rally printed a picture of you and trump together\n\nhttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-trump-kicks-out-protesters-from-rally"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt_16476
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt
subject: Fwd: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "10/3/2017 12:26:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Plane management", "body": "does this mean that under their brilliant structure you will have a profit and pay tax for using your plane??! . call me re other issue please we need to make a decision today"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won’t take long to do. We’re just swamped. I’ll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn’t be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven’t heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt_16477
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Gmax gmax1@ellmax.com"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 10:37:36 AM", "subject": null, "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt_16493
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt
subject: trump getting RNC bounce...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2016 4:28:09 PM", "subject": "trump getting RNC bounce...", "body": "Monday, July 25\n\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CNN/ORC\nClinton\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CBS News\nClinton\nGeneral Election: Trump vs.\n\nClinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein ee\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CBS News\n\nClinton vs. Johnson\n\nResults\n\nTrump 48, Clinton 45\n\nTrump 44, Clinton 43\n\nClinton 39, Trump 44, Johnson 9,\nStein 3\n\nClinton 39, Trump 40, Johnson 12\n\nSpread\n\nTrump +3\n\nTrump +1\n\nTrump +5\n\nTrump +1"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt_16506
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt
subject: thank you to friends of Poetry in America
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa Nw", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2017 7:18:33 PM", "subject": "thank you to friends of Poetry in America", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: (and please see personal P.S. under my signature!)\n\nIam writing now, as I have for the last several years, to update you on the work that Poetry in America and Verse Video Education have done in the\nlast year. Below, I detail the accomplishments of 2017 and, below that, some projects I hope to complete in 2018. But first: my deepest thanks to you\nwho have contributed financially, intellectually, creatively, and in so many other ways to Poetry in America’s work.\n\nSome of you receiving this letter have generously supported Verse Video Education, the independent non-profit production company (a 501¢3) I\nfounded in 2015. Verse Video Education now partners with WGBH television as well as with Harvard University (and others) to make the highest\nquality educational media for broad audiences. Whether you supported me by sharing your own interpretive talents on camera or by helping me to\nland elusive talent; whether you provided me funding, or equipment, or business wisdom, or organizational advice,\n\nor a space in which to film, or just plain interest in the work-- I am immensely grateful. Making media-- and especially television-- is complex, and\nexpensive, and I could not have navigated the road from professor to professor/producer/director without you.\n\nOthers of you have supported my humanities work at Harvard, and, in particular, Harvard's efforts to provide distance education of all kinds. Now\n(along with partners at the Bok Center, HarvardX, the Graduate School of Education, and the Extension School), I produce educational content for a\nwide global community of learners. Increasingly, Poetry in America not only distributes state-of-the-art humanities content within and beyond\nHarvard’s gates, but we also train, mentor, and support a growing number of Harvard undergraduates and graduate students with interests in\neducation, media, and the public humanities. These students now comprise a vibrant community of young Harvard humanists gaining experience in\nonline teaching, curriculum design, educational policy, international education, video production, video editing, and more. By supporting Poetry in\nAmerica, you\n\nalso support forward-looking humanities education at Harvard. (Update: those of you who are alumni of Harvard College are now eligible to receive\nclass credit for your donations to Poetry in America projects.)\n\nIt's thrilling for me to report that our two largest efforts of the last few years are both coming to fruition.\n\nPoetry in America’s 13-episode television series, along with its parallel PBS LearningMedia Collection for educators, will air on PBS stations\nnationwide beginning in April 2018. Click here for a sneak peek at our 90-second series trailer (password: Poetry90). Featuring such guest\ninterpreters as those in the trailer-- and dozens of others-- each half-hour episode of the series offers a deep dive into one important American poem.\nDiscussions on a second season have begun!\n\nMeanwhile, our Harvard partners at the Extension School and the Graduate School of Education have agreed, for a limited time, to make the full\nsuite of Poetry in America online courses accessible to learners all over the world, offering a steep reduction in course fees. Students and teachers\nworldwide can now take any Poetry in America course-- at any credit level-- for $200. (Take a look at our 2018 offerings here.) Those of you who\nsupport individual schools or school networks: please note that through 2018 groups of five teachers or students can take any Poetry in America\ncourse for $1000 and receive graduate, undergraduate, or professional development credit-- and, that group’s facilitator can receive free tuition.\nPlease feel free to distribute our offerings to educators whose work you support anywhere in the world.\n\nHarvard’s highly unusual decision to slash tuition for the next year follows the great success of Poetry in America’s first course for educators--\nPoetry in America for Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. In recognition of this course, David Coleman (president of the College Board)\nhas offered support to allow us to continue developing and providing access to the highest quality educational and professional development\nhumanities content. In 2018, as I lay out below, we seek to expand the scope of our offerings, and to work with our many partners to broaden access\nto all learners.\n\nThank you for your support for this work, and warmest best to you all in this holiday season.\n\nSincerely,\nLisa"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt_16508
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt
subject: woody and deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:25:26 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum \nsent me... .1 found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need \nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than \nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years. \nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next \nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing \nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and \nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those. \nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by \ncomputer."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt_16515
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt
subject: Trump Wall Street
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 4:15:25 PM", "subject": "Trump Wall Street", "body": "Any big finance names out there supporting trump that we have not\nheard about? We are trying to get an angle on who is supporting and\nwho is not."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt_16518
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Saturday, November 5, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "unfortunatlely , too much work around the election. I will need to cancel doha before the 9th, it is soooo crazy. many stories to tell when i see you. when do you leave.? I feel badly about changes at the last minute , but i hope you understand."}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No worries. I understand your situation. I will leave on the 9th will be back on 13th. Again leave on the 16 and back on 18th. I had fixed an appoint for you on Monday with Shk. Hamad. Which I shall cancel and fix later. Let me know when you plan again your trip to Doha."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 1:38:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thank you for being understanding, I hate canceling. but i will explain when isee you. . the states will be in turmoil for awhile no matter who wins, its also possible that there will be court battles to decide . like bush gore.. one thing is for sure, women are angry, they have more power, and race relations are sensitve."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt_16520
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 12:52:15 AM", "subject": "U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "Richard Kahn\nHBRK Associates Inc.\n\n575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor\nNew York, NY 10022\n\nTel\nCell"}, {"sender": "Sadis & Goldberg Tax Group", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 23, 2015 at 3:02:13 PM EST", "subject": "Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in\nNew Tax Law Open Door to Increased\nForeign Investment in U.S. Real\nProperty Interests\n\nFor further information about this Alert,\n\nplease contact:\n\nSteven Etkind\nPartner"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt_16528
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Merwin Dela cruz", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 5:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "presidnet trump is going to be at our neighbors on thurs, so dont be surprsised if secret service check in"}, {"sender": "Merwin Dela cruz", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/14/2019 10:16:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the heads up sir."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt_16533
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt
subject: RE: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 5:40:45 PM", "subject": "RE: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number | should reach.\n\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or\nanything of the kind.\n\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already\nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\n\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great\nartists when they need it.\n\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source.\n\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet,\nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in\nperson.\n\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\n\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt_16535
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt
subject: Heads up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2015 1:00:36 AM", "subject": "Heads up", "body": "I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt_16536
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [likely landon.thomas@nytimes.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:53:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella <"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt_16538
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/26/2018 5:14:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tom pritzker has asked if you have ideas re the Pritzker Prize"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\n\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack", "tom", "tom jacques"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt_16539
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:20:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt_16549
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt
subject: Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemnler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "AS just received."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22 2015 07:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt_16563
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 2:09:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can chat now io: if not, when works?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "time to talk today, ? now that the book is a dud, no trump, clinton ete. I woudl like to move forward."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt_16574
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt
subject: on trump [C]
messages:
  [{"sender": "Daniel Sabba", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2015 1:31:09 PM", "subject": "on trump [C]", "body": "http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-the-worlds-greatest-troll/\n\nthought provoking stats\n\nThe Republican Field Has Been Trumped\n\nGoogle News hits and Google searches (June 14, 2015, through July \n12, 2015), compared with Betfair odds (as of July 19, 2015)\n\nTrump \nBush \nChristie \nWalker \nJindal \nCruz \nRubio \nPaul \nKasich \nH uckabee \nGraham \nPerry \nFiorina \nCarson \nSantorum \nPataki \n\nMedia coverage \n(Google News hits) \n1111 13 \n• 9 \n8 \n16 \nI 4 \nI 4 \n12 \n12 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n<1 \n4696 \n\nPublic interest Chance of winning \n(Google searches) nomination (Betfair) \n•9 \n13 \n15 \n1 3 \n13 \n12 \n13 \n11 \n11 \n11 \n11 \n1 3 \n<1 \n<1 \n6296 \nI 5 \n1111 ____ 5 `I \nI 3 \nl<1 \n13 \n13 \n16 \n18 \n\nFIVETHIRTYEIGHT \nSOURCE GOGGLE. PREDICTWISE. BETFAIR"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt_16575
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt
subject: Fwd: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Friday 10 February 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\n\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:11:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: update", "body": "!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt_16576
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lajcak Miroslav/MINISTER/MZV"], "timestamp": "March 24, 2018 6:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Miroslav Lajčák", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 5:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thanks! I think we've heard enough proofs on this subject today:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Agreed"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt_16578
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the\nnuclear issue is the wrong strategy\n\nRay Takeyh\n\nFebruary 14, 2013 -- On Feb. 26, the United States and Iran will once\nmore resume their diplomatic ritual, in the so-called six-party talks, over\nIran's disputed nuclear program. As the two perennial adversaries eye one\nanother, there are competing paradigms about how to deal with Tehran.\n\nAn emerging school of thought suggests that the best means of \"testing\"\nIran is to offer it a final nuclear agreement that presumably promises\nmeasurable relief from sanctions for significant Iranian concessions. Iran's\nfailure to grasp such an offer would then conclusively demonstrate to both\ndomestic and international audiences that the cause of the impasse is not\nAmerican belligerence but Iranian truculence.\n\nBut this approach fails to recognize that an arms-control process is\nnecessarily an incremental one, nor does it offer a practical substitute to\nthe existing step-by-step diplomacy.\n\nIran's nuclear program encompasses a vast complex of enrichment\nfacilities, centrifuge construction plants, uranium extraction companies\nand thousands of scientists working in university and government\nlaboratories. Iran is enriching uranium at both 5% and 20% levels,\nexperimenting with high-velocity centrifuges and seemingly in the process\nof constructing additional enrichment facilities.\n\nSuch a multilayered, multifaceted program can be dealt with only on a\npiecemeal basis, as the technical details and rules for inspections are too\ncomplex to be addressed in a single agreement.\n\nMoreover, should the United States offer Iran a final deal, Tehran still has\na right to contest and negotiate its provisions and offer counterproposals."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt_16579
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal\n\nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke -\nDonald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pirie introduced\nUS ...\n\nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month.\n\nI think you would both enjoy spending time together -\n\nThanks to you both for always supporting me.\n\nYou are both copied.\n\nMelanie"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassel", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018 at 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks Melanie\n\nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish Melanie was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the\n25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.\n\nBe well."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Neal Kassel"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes, will be in town , coordiante atime closer . look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassel", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 12:50:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Will do\n\nDoes Leslie do your schedule?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt_16591
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt
subject: Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Gordon Getty", "david haig", "Norman Finkelstein"], "timestamp": "4/11/2018 2:18:04 AM", "subject": "Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz", "body": "My God\nthat Jewish Nazi is joining to join our Narcissistic Psychopath for dinner—how appropriate\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/politics/donald-trump-alan-dershowitz/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt_16598
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "[aE", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things:\n\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. —strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced \" andys office\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions.. - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mueller? how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Ev rotc", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a piece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his friends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:40:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "One guy in the Times article on him got it about right i think.\n\nApart from the publicity hound bit, i think of him as a guy who cut and run in your case and looked out for himself. He never hesitates to respond to me by email; but when i read about something that came up in his deposition that i thought might help you and emailed him for a copy - radio silence.\n\nI guess these days he likes to make himself relevant. Oh well, we all have our strengths and weaknesses i am sure and i have many more of the latter.\n\nnicely put. !. sounds like you suffer a similar bias. :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt_16603
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Joseph Evangelist", "a", "ie"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 04:56:55 2010", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Daley and frankel are saying that I need to go on TV (CNBC) to defend our hedge funds. Thoughts?"}, {"sender": "eT", "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "Joseph Evangelist", "i"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 06:12:14 2010", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I wouldn't do it. Not yet and not from Davos. As you know, Davos has had some criticism in the press for bank CEOs attending and I feel like it's the wrong way to go for your first interview as IB CEO. I also think print has much more impact than TV. Talk to Lionel and Robert while you're there -- they are the two guys who can move the needle on this. And let's do more in print when you get back. In fact, Matt Zames and I spent an hour and a half with WSJ's Kate Kelly from the Journal on this issue for a major story she's doing on the Obama proposal. Let's have you quoted in that."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "This is what my PR person said.\n\nI'm seeing Darling tomorrow morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "kate kelly is a snake. im glad they said no interview,, ask peters advice he is the pr genius"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt_16612
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt
subject: Fwd: contacts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/1/2016 6:45:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: contacts", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky,\nnathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain , demsaio, christakis, dennet, sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman,\nseligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp ,\n\nleahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, .\n\nblaine, boris, larry summers.\n\njagland, andrew, woody\n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz. _raafat, sultan\n\nhamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro,\n\nsmell menatlal fit, , lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein , diet excersicse\n\nAK chad pinto |sj, bbj, ana brice, \\\nloen terjge rothschild\nbradk"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt_16614
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKASIIII", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/25/2019 10:23:28 PM", "subject": null, "body": "seeing me for lunch early July I hate you for introducing me to her can't get her out of my mind \nwhat do you think will happen between trump and xi have a great f 35 story but not for e mail and it's \nno state secret"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028934.txt_16616
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028934.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular\ndogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For\nexample, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that\nthe US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to\nits purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as\nour minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR\nprofession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt_16622
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt
subject: Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 12:48:11 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 14, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 1:27:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 5:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt_16623
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <JEFIII>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, lye set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:23:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt_16635
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt
subject:
  Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke PY", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:04:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Only You Have Photo"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 12:02:02 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015, 11:57", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023352.txt_16640
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023352.txt
subject: jobs ahead
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "1. review accounting system. Book keeping softaware. _ staff, ( senior accountant ) methods on line banking,\nbrokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax\n\nfilings FBAR FATCA, gaming commsion, pfics, insurance . uk co law.\n\n2. review docs for TRA BRH grats, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing\n\npowers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death\n\n3 review bills . boats , planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands all outside. legal and accounting. Toms bills over\n400k . house projects. south ny ben\n\n4 cashflow projections tax projections , interaction with Apollo accounting tax, Phaidon ,art space ,and\nRegan. legal accounting. audit\n\n5. children meetings , review to date and allocations\n\n6 review all role in payables. files scanned, no paper\n\n7 review invesmtents for tax basis and unrecognized gain\n\n8 schedule of all hedge funds . redeemables commitments etc.\n\n9 charities pledges strucutre, staff ,"}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "Melanie Spinella\n, Ada Clapp\n\nRichard Joslin\nlets look at funding the art partnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 inveestment. and the\nsame amoiunt of value from trust. leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. . later we can\namend and add .\n\n2 hire an IT person asap\n\n3.1 would hire jerry the woman. gittis. person\n\n4 I will find a subpart k person to handle partnership acct\n\n5 , accounting software upgrade, onlilne banking needs to be seamless\n\n6. not sure status of bringing plane boat acct inhouse?\n\n7 prepare fbar report for june. draft next week\n\n8 pahidon actuals vs projections. . new valuation\n\n9. new valuation of tra contract?\n\njpm db goldman sachs acct? new llc?\n\nreview of dec 31 books for all entities? bfp . etc"}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: jobs ahead", "body": "the list that we discussed... i spent time with brad again. re the candidates . fiiling due, this week, next\nmonth, ."}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "as areflection on your voiced spirited concerns inthe what have you done for me lately category ?\n\nyy: . inthe beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt_16643
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 1:19:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You nailed it! (before ~1/2 of family).\n\nStill in China - from Party Congress through Trump “State+ Visit\". Many interviews/commentaries (CNN/BBC attached).\n\nMore important (from some ultimate reference frame): Radical Breakthroughs. Preproduction going well; expect to send by end of month complete preproduction document, with 3-4 pages on each of the 13 episodes - refined versions of the prototypes (first two episodes) I sent you in late Sept. Excited. Looking forward to\n\ndiscussing content.\n\nI'll be in NY from ~Nov. 21/22 through early January. When to meet? Breakthroughs and of course politics / geopolitics (so much).\n\nRobert"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt_16654
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt
subject: Fw: The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alexandra Preate <apreate@capitalhq.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:37:29 -0400", "subject": "The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": "https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-deplorables-called-into-battle-aoain-1535376353?mod=mhp\n\nThe `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again\nAs midterms near, President Trump's former political guru Steve Bannon rallies the troops\nGerald F. SeibAug. 27, 2018 9:25 a.m. ET\nBy\nGerald F. Seib\nSteve Bannon doesn't do subtle. So it's no surprise that there's nothing subtle about the new movie President Trump's\nonetime political guru has produced to energize the Trump base for this year's midterm elections.\nIt's entitled \"Trump at War,\" and it's an hour and 15 minutes of pure Trumpian adrenaline. It opens with a series of shots\nof Trump supporters being attacked by angry opponents, shifts to outtakes of Trump supporters proudly accepting the\n\"deplorables\" label bestowed by Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, runs through a long series of\nangry ripostes at Trump detractors and praise of administration policy moves, and closes with dire warnings of the need to\nvote for Republicans in 2018 to head off efforts by liberals to impeach the president.\nMr. Bannon previewed the film for some Republican supporters in Dallas recently, but the big premiere is scheduled for\nSept. 9—chosen because it is the second anniversary of the speech in which Mrs. Clinton used the \"basket of deplorables\"\nphrase. The location? The very club in Manhattan where Mrs. Clinton made the speech, which has been rented for the\noccasion.\nAside from what they say about Mr. Bannon as a political provocateur, the film and its unveiling also reveal a lot about\nhow people in the president's circle increasingly see this year's midterm election: Its importance is growing every day; \nRepublican success starts with turning out core Trump supporters; and the best way to motivate them is by brandishing the\nfear of impeachment proceedings if Democrats win control of Congress.\nSteve Bannon believes the specter of impeachment will motivate mainstream Republicans as well as core Trump\nbackers. Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press\n\"This is all grass roots,\" Mr. Bannon says. \"It's 2016 all over again...This is Trump's first re-election.\"\nThe political calculus behind such thinking is pretty simple: In 19 months as president, Mr. Trump has hardened his grip\non his base of supporters and the GOP overall, but has done little to expand that base.\nMeanwhile, as the Labor Day kickoff of the fall campaign approaches, Republicans face a Democratic party whose\nactivists appear exceptionally motivated—to campaign, donate money and turn out in November.\nRepublicans need something to match that fervor. That something is the Trump base—and the best motivating tools are\nanger and fear.\nIn this case, that means specifically the fear that Special Counsel Robert Mueller, New York prosecutors and a\nDemocratic Congress will conspire to kick Mr. Trump out of office. That's why Republicans are talking about the specter\nof impeachment, not Democrats. Democrats know impeachment talk is a surefire way to motivate the other side.\nBut there's a problem in this GOP formula: A motivated Trump base is necessary for Republicans to head off disaster in\nNovember, but it's not sufficient, at least not if Democrats remain as energized as they appear today. The Trump base has\nto be married with more mainstream Republicans—the kind hardcore activists refer to as RIN0s, or \"Republicans In\nName Only\"—and with some independent voters.\nRight now, independent voters are hard to read. Their sentiments have been shifting around a lot in Wall Street\nJournal/NBC News polling in recent months. As a general rule, they have a low regard for Mr. Trump personally and\nappear weary of the atmosphere of constant crisis around him. But the polling also indicates they increasingly like how\nRepublicans are handling the economy, appreciate the GOP tax cut and think the party is changing the way things work in\nWashington.\nThat leaves moderate Republicans, of whom Mr. Bannon says simply: \"We need RINOs.\"\n=,==\nSupporters of President Trump cheer before a rally in Lewis Center, Ohio, earlier this month. Photo: Carolyn\nKaster/Associated Press\nThe Bannon calculation is that the specter of impeachment will motivate these soft Republicans as well as core Trump\nbackers. More conventional Republicans may be disdainful of Mr. Trump personally, but they also think the tax cuts,\nderegulatory policies and judicial nominations they like are imperiled if he goes down.\nSo, impeachment-scare talk, Mr. Bannon is calculating, is effective for RINOS too, simply for different reasons. For the\nTrump base, impeachment talk is a source of outrage. Soft Republicans dislike it for less emotional, more practical\nreasons.\nAll this means Republican candidates have a dual mission right now: Keep motivating those base Trump voters, who want\nfull-throated defenses of the president and odes to his hard-line immigration policies, while also luring out to the polls\nmainstream Republicans and independents who dislike the president but like lower taxes and less regulation.\nAnd if political advertising is any indication, candidates appear to be embracing both messages with nearly equal fervor.\nData compiled by CMAG Kantar Media on all political ads run so far this year show that a pro-Trump message is the\nmost common element of GOP ads. Next in line? Mentions of the tax cut Republicans pushed through Congress last year.\nWrite to Gerald F. Seib at jerry.seib@wsj.com"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2018 6:11:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt_16657
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt
subject: Barrack
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Owen Blicksilver"], "timestamp": "8/23/2017 6:31:58 PM", "subject": "Barrack", "body": "Hi Owen -- you probably saw this, but wanted to pass on just the same. Still very \ninterested in doing a story on Tom. \nThanks. \nLandon \nhttp://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/22/trump-arizona-phoenix-rally-241923 \nAt dinners at Trump's Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club, billionaire investor Tom Barrack \nand New York real estate tycoon Richard LeFrak both talked about his potential to have \nmore support, administration officials and advisers said. Barrack, in particular, homed in \non the president's sagging poll numbers and encouraged him to govern past his political \nbase, according to one person briefed on the conversation."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt_16659
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you inshalla"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt_16671
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt
subject: US Presidential Election Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2016 9:07:53 AM", "subject": "US Presidential Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nPlease find attached report of InsightsPod generated after third US Presidential debate. Trump’s popularity has\nincreased after third debate.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021642.txt_16683
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021642.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11/25/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ls", "recipients": ["Miami", "ALL RECEIVING OFFICES"], "timestamp": "11/25/2008", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11/25/2008", "body": "Read and clear."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031810.txt_16686
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031810.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE:", "body": "Ive had enough!!!!'|_ Which puts ????"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett <paul@alphagroupcapital.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeficy 5. i;", "Richard Kahn i"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: _ the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt_16689
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 2:02:30 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\nFYI\nTrump estimate arrival Jan 12 evening\n\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12, time TBD (likely PM)\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15, time TBD (likely PM)\n\nAdvance teams arrive tomorrow — hope to learn more specific times for these movements and will update you.\nRumors of a visit the following week are surfacing — January 19-21,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt_16695
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? im between alber and santa fe,, zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Sill just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:05:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "SAAAAAAAAAAAFe good boy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt_16703
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that \nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:37:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt_16708
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt_16718
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 11:18:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn i s Andrews accuser, \n,long criminal record. total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or \nreporters to investigate,., the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone \nanswerer„ she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs \nridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt_16719
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 1, 2019 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\nemmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why is this interesting?...Donny duetsch now has a show....should | go on and talk about \"the jeffrey |\nknow\",,.?....1 am in london when you are in paris...we should try to make progress then"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 3, 2019 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Future"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Huh?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "6/3/2019 1:20:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nobt"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt_16730
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt
subject: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 5:40:46 PM", "subject": "AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt_16735
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt
subject: Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model | New York Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 12:56:55 PM", "subject": "Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model | New York Post", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/02/16/ronan-farrow-details-alleged-trump-affair-with-playboy-model-in-new-yorker-piece/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt_16739
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt
subject: Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous <paldhous@buzzfeed.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \n\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\n[... detailed list of incidents ...]\n\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter Aldhous"], "timestamp": "December 11, 2017 at 10:18:30 AM MST", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. I am currently on a plane until noon pacific time, and then heading to a meeting right after landing, till about 2 pm or so. [... detailed response to each allegation ...] What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, or sometimes aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I work to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated, whatever their behavior or request."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Sam Harris"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:47:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss", "body": "I was planning on writing both of you today or tomorrow if buzzfeed decided to go ahead with their story after I wrote to them, but since they sent this to you here is what I was planning to forward.. namely my response to their email and their original email. I hope it helps. They have clearly decided in advance to try to smear me, and potentially other atheists (I found the remarks in their 'miscellaneous facts' telling in this regard), and I felt a detailed response to the false claims was important. If you want to discuss this further I am happy to. I am currently on a plane heading to phoenix.\n\nThanks for forwarding.\n\nLMK"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018938.txt_16742
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018938.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "09/13/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006", "body": "frequency of the (561) area code numbers listed on toll records. b7C\n\nPlease contact SAL___ att should any further information be needed."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt_16745
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 8:38:47 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Trump is expected to be in PBI\nDec 21st -Jan 6th\nFrom Atlantic Aviaiton:\nFor your planning purposes, please be advised that PBI is expecting a Presidential TFR from December\n21' until January 6th. As of this moment."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt_16758
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}, {"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ramo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joshua Cooper Ramo"], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 10:41:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Very"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt_16760
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 1:06:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt_16762
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 12:31:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:01 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He will be by himself. Perhaps a trump administration aide to assist and accompany him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:30 PM -0800", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Who will represent Acosta at hearings"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt_16772
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "1/24/2014 8:20:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mr. Epstein,\n\nWe currently have two negatives on first page in Google but one is at 6th and the other at 7th. (Universal\nsearch, no history applied). Results will be very different if that PC has been used to click or search any of the\nresults and has not been cleared.\n\nHow did you pull the results you just sent?\n\nUsing Google Chrome + InCognito Mode + Clearing Browser Cache = only reliable reporting. I can help set\nyou up with this. Screenshot here of results using above method - http://.imgur.com/tfGN3Zj.png. This is the\ntrue representation of what your average searcher will find (statistically, most searches will be from users whom\nhave not clicked on your negative articles before)\n\nMuch progress has been made since we spoke - premium placements are getting secured over next week,\nhundreds of links have been built to your primary sites and the first movements are kicking in today (NY Mag\nmoved up to 4th a few hours ago). We still have confidence we are on the right track and doing everything we\ncan to get this cleaned up - another 45 days should be enough to have a clean first page based on what has been\ndone.\n\nPS - The foundation site was just hacked and I'm in the process of fixing that today. You can actually see it in\nthe screenshot above (it reads Cash Advance advertisement in the short-description). This is something a\nprevious company deployed but we are now going through and securing the rest of the domains to prevent basic\nhiacks like this.\n\nI'm free on my cell for next few hours. 3\n\nSincerely,\n\nTyler Shears"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "About 40,700,000 results (0.21 seconds)\n\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt_16778
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun. \nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings! \nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft. \nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt_16779
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt
subject: whoopsie
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "10/2/2018 11:26:53 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-\n\n2018-10-02"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt_16790
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt
subject: Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/9/2016 8:14:10 AM", "subject": "Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-could-deal-life-defeat-090000096.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt_16792
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<i >"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\n\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\n\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the\nYemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to\nYemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\n\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\n\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international\npressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace\nefforts.\n\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,\" he noted.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-\nAhmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign\nminister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings.\n\n\"We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["qq"], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi\nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon. email you after. how much\nfun"}, {"sender": "qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think .. and if peace agreement\n\nwas signed in kuwait that would be weed"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you going to Saudi"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 6:45:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no 1 will be in dubai"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt_16794
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt
subject: Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:41:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record,\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm at or my desk is\n\nThanks,\nAshley\nAshley Parker\nCell:\nDesk:\nTwitter: @AshleyRParker"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt_16796
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt
subject: Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/15/2018 12:33:37 AM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018, at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt_16803
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt
subject: Re: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\n\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Mar 21, 2018, at 09:37", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "and i thought- I had tsuris"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 1:54:31 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "You and your boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie Get Hard.\nSent via tin can and string."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt_16810
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS TE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey’s chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI’s personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:20:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon’t follow your note. What texts"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt_16813
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:23:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Saw Matt C with DIT at golf tournament I know why he was there\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt_16816
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will probably hire dershowitz, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:20:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes agree\nseems like dershowitz has been interviewing for that job for last 2 months on fox news.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt_16826
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as@domain.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 3:16:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't believe it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 23, 2012 07:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt_16834
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn <11.>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk, I have great hopes for this and am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and presence is less than A , and probaby closer to a C +/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would like to chat."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes - see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\nHow's late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today - mother 102 in May.)\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry, biology [molecular and evolutionary[, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n4. Power Laws\n5. Mathematical Biology\n6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)\nADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes\n9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years.\nIn the non-Closer To Truth world....\nDid CNN Intl this morning on Trump's China-oil-N.Korea-cheating tweet \"Caught RED HANDED...\" [pun deliberate]\nMy favorite fun lines (there are so many) in Trump's NYTimes spontaneous interview.\n2) \"I like very much President Xi. He treated me better than anybody's ever been treated in the history of China.\"\nEver (-5,000 year history)\n1) \"I know the details of taxes better than anybody___better than the greatest CPA.\"\nNot, mind you, CPAs in general, not even smart Jewish CPAs who work all the time - but whoever, out of 664,532 actively licensed CPAs (2016), is the greatest CPA of them all (#1 in citing code? creative deductions?) - better than him!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "it need to be about the topic and the person. some of these people are not engaging at all. I m happy to pay for more preprduction to get it right."}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/29/2017 10:03:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Agree! 'Get It Right' is singular priority - we think alike. This is the Role and Importance of pre-production.\nFunds adequate.\nClarity critical, as is charisma. However, given intimacy of TV interviews, it's not always apparent upfront who communicates well. Usually by not always. Sometimes someone who is a great lecturer to 500 students falls flat or off puts as arrogant. Sometimes a mousey introvert with intense eye and facial expressions sparkles and radiates. There is no substitute, however, for clarity.\nLooking forward to discussion."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt_16835
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt
subject: Re: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:56 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to upgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "3 hrs"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Talk in 40?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt_16836
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:21:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won't take long to do. We're just swamped. I'll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn't be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt_16840
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt
subject: Re: After Words
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:21 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Dear Friends, \nI wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book 'After Words'. He truly is \nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was \nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. I will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read. \nI trust this email finds you well. \nKindest regards \nKatherine X \nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011, at 10:42 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "In NY. You?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 3:08:38 PM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Send me your phone number \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011961.txt_16841
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011961.txt
subject: MC2
messages:
  [{"sender": "Manuela - Mega Partners", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "17/10/2014 9:36 PM (GMT+02:00)", "subject": "MC2", "body": "Dear Jean Luc,\n\nI’m very happy to hear you’re coming to the agency with Vini so we can talk about us working\nwith MC2 again.\n\nI don’t need to remind you that the sex trafficking allegations have stopped us from working with *\nyour agency for the past 5-6 years — but as Vinicius is my friend, J will try to find a girl that\nalready knows and trusts him to place with you.\n\nThank you very much for the lovely bag and we’ll see each other on fashion week.\n\nKisses,\n\nManuela"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt_16842
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt
subject: Fwd: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": "Guy Amico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 1:1", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey, \nphotos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting, this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses vinyl for logos.\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 5:00:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt_16844
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 4:35:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes. im afraid you are right"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt_16847
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:46:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "itried acoupe of times [I"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Call ne. as"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt_16863
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt
subject: NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 11:53:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses", "body": "Here's a link from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting: \nNewly obtained tax information reveals that from 1985 to 1994, Donald J. Trump's businesses were in far \nbleaker condition than was previously known. \nSee More...  \nGet The New York Times on your mobile device  \nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt_16864
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "michael can you do today at 12 instead of tomorw?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can't. With the Trump people today."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/13/2016 1:48:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "btw, liked your fake news article"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt_16871
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt
subject: Fwd: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "NN Scott", "J. Link", "Darren Indyke", "J. Zack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:12:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDuration: 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt_16872
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt
subject: Re: deja’ vu' by pk
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM", "subject": "Re: deja’ vu' by pk", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM", "subject": "Re: deja’ vu' by pk", "body": "Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit\n\nI shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long\n\nnurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation’s direction is interpreted as an extension\n\nof the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.\n\nWithout going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of\na conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator\nAlan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then\n13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would\n\nbe confirmed.\n\nThe conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the\nmembers of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an\nappropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas\nwould then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a\n\njocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations.\n\nSenator Simpson was saying, “Y’know, Clarence, I’ve seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time,\n\nbut I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.”\n\n“T’ll never forget it,” Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. “They were in a barn. Except\n\nthat the inside of the barn was like a theater.”\n\nSenator Hatch interjected, “Summer stock, eh? No pun intended”"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt_16877
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:30:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt_16900
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:52:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren: \nI hope you are well. \nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I'm forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit. \nMany thanks, \nHoward"}, {"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard: \nWe're working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you'd have them first thing tomorrow. \nWould you like to comment on the following:\n1. You've said that the women pressing suits against Mr. Epstein \"have lied repeatedly, and in no way shape or form were they victims. They were at his place freely and voluntarily. And one of them showed Epstein a fake ID.\" What do you have to say now that Mr. Epstein has admitted in his federal plea bargain that he did conspire to entice minors to engage in prostitution? Accepting that these women came voluntarily, isn't Mr Epstein still guilty of statutory rape?\n2. Brad Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the women, recently served a Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition on Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Subpoena asks that Maxwell produce \"a list of all girls\" that visited Jeffrey Epstein's homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan, or flew on his planes. Edwards said in an interview that Maxwell was \"second-in-command of Epstein's criminal enterprise.\" He added, \"She was on Epstein's plane, transporting girls for the purpose of having sex with other people. She kept a computer database of hundreds of girls and oversaw the schedule of girls who came to Epstein's homes.\"\n3. A suit filed last May by \"Jane Doe 102\" against Epstein alleges that, after recruiting her as a 15-year-old girl to give Epstein massages, Maxwell and Epstein took part in \"sexually assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff.\"\n4. The same suit alleges that Epstein \"lured\" the girl \"every day for next two weeks\" to his house. The suit claims that she eventually became a \"sex slave\" to Epstein, traveling with him around the world. \"In all of these locations, she was required to engage in sex acts with him and other women - including other minors.\"\n5. Did Jane Doe 102 — who now lives in Australia — go on the 2002 trip where President Clinton flew on Mr. Epstein's Boeing 727?\n6. \"Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when defendant [Jane Doe 102] knew that the plaintiff was approximately 15, 16 and 17 years old and, after years of daily sexual exploitation continued into her adulthood ... until she fled at age 19,\"\n7. When Maxwell and Epstein celebrated Jane Doe 102's 16th birthday with her, Epstein joked that he would have to \"trade her in\" because she was getting too old for him.\n8. Not only was Jane Doe 102 required to satisfy Epstein's \"every sexual whim,\" but she also was exploited by Epstein's adult male peers. They included \"royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen and others in various locations around the world.\"\n9. The Palm Beach Post and lawyers representing Epstein's alleged victims have called his federal non-prosecution agreement a \"secret,\" \"backroom,\" \"sweetheart\" deal, noting that none of his alleged victims was consulted. Several critics have claimed Epstein \"bought\" the agreement, using politically-connected lawyers. Would he like to comment?\n10. Is Epstein cooperating with federal suit against Bear Steams hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin? Willhetestifyintheircases?\n11. Mr Epstein was deposed on this week, on Thursday. Is it true that he answered almost every question by invoking his FifthAmendmentrights?\n12. Defense attorney Brad Evans has filed a motion to freeze Mr Epstein's assets. Has Mr. Epstein moved his money from the US offshore or abroad, or does he intend to, in order to protect his assets from possible damage claims?\n13. What did Mr. Epstein do during his work release program while serving time. Reports have said he engaged in \"scientific research.\" If so, what was he researching?\n14. Has Mr. Epstein returned to pursuing his investment business? Is Mr Epstein still on probation?\n15. Is Mr. Epsteinpermittedto leave FloridaortheUnited States? Do authoritiesholdhis passport?\nYou can reach me via e-mail or at or We close our column at 3 pm on Friday but can add comments as late as 3 pm on Saturday. Many thanks.\nGeorge"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt_16908
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt
subject: Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon a"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "iknow, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "‘Thanks for sharing the foxhole’"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic -- but to answer arandom gmail email, that is not smart!\n\nHoware you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i tired to call you , not for email"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt_16911
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 3:17:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he refused their resignations . soi am told."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt_16952
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... Still working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — In your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. Also, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? Please let me know."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt_16956
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "1/29/2011 12:36:51 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon \nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt_16957
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt
subject: Re: Keating Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:32:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 28, 2011, at 12:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Paul Keating explains as never before\n• BY:PAUL KELLY, EDITOR-AT-LARGE\n• From:The Australian\nOctober 22, 2011 12:00AM\nhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/paul-keating-explains-as-never-before/story-e6fro6z6-1226173493029"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt_16973
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "son. 16. apr. 2017 kl. 11.12", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will begin"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}, {"sender": "Thorbjen Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You should feel well for having done so much for us"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:26:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Makes me happy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt_17002
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:02:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes Onconference finish in 10 min"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fF"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also,\ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down\nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn’t offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt_17003
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:30:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt_17004
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt
subject: Re: (no subject)
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets \nwith it thanks Jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt_17005
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029197.txt_17029
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029197.txt
subject: Re: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jakob Kéllhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\njust back from a long tour ,,on origins”.\n\nAs promised you will get my message promptly.\n\nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget implies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily on amounts in ,,kilos”. (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before deadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum).\n\nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment.\n\nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines.\n\nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come.\n\nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 cancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the other place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am going to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could take a hitchhiker. :)\n\nLawrence M. Krauss"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt_17039
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt
subject: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris:\n\nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI’m getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let’s get together on Friday night.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nKevin"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:21:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt_17047
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it depends on which subject. economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 8:23:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt_17048
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:39 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "are you in this week?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Today and tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bfast?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, time?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 09, 2018 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We on for tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 09, 2018 4:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yds 8"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/9/2018 9:11:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Trump's handpicked sdnyusa just authorized a search warrant of trump's private lawyer's office looking for trump \ncommunications....had to justify it with crime-fraud exception....trump has to be shitting water"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt_17049
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing Heidi a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011960.txt_17051
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011960.txt
subject: The situation with Liza Zazdravnih
messages:
  [{"sender": "Vladimir Yudashkin @ 1 MotherAgency", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "17/10/2014 10:46 AM (GMT+02:00)", "subject": "The situation with Liza Zazdravnih", "body": "Dear JeanLuc,\n\nUnfortunately I need to announce that Liza Zazdravnih rejected signing the contract with MC2 in United Sates. Initially she intended to sign the contract, but later on she came across that article in internet about you involved in illegal activities with young models. This information somehow changed her intentions completely. she is ready to be a model and consider contracts with other agencies, but she has suspicions that you will force her to illegal activities and she made the decision to don't put her self in risk.\n\nLets keep in touch. I will be happy to work with you next time if we have another right model for you. Im upset that it didn't work out with Liza\n\nSincerely,\nVladimir"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032765.txt_17054
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032765.txt
subject: Re: Match made in heaven
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:53:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Match made in heaven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "trump will probably hire dershowitz, no joke"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033309.txt_17074
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033309.txt
subject: Article on political trends
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:09:42 PM", "subject": "Article on political trends", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/16/secret-history-trumpism-donald-trump?CMP=share_btn_tw\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030716.txt_17087
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030716.txt
subject: RE: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 8:32:08 AM", "subject": "RE: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "All good. Bannon with me"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\n\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032771.txt_17094
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032771.txt
subject: Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Apr 17, 2018, at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "thought you and lisa might find amusing an aftershock of the me too movement, the revival of my fair \nlady has eliza dolittle walking out of the house when at the end Higgins says ok get my slippers instead of the \noriginal happy ever after."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/17/2018 6:31:49 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Adding Lisa. Scary to be a guy in today s World."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt_17102
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt
subject: Re: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2015 2:17:30 AM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J Jep", "recipients": ["GG", "Indyke, Darren K."], "timestamp": "Monday, September 21, 2015 at 22:08 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "‘"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt_17106
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt
subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:04:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "David Peag", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt_17108
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolft [S"], "timestamp": "1/31/2019 10:47:52 PM", "subject": null, "body": "PF worked at mara lago. . she was the one that accused prince andrew. . trump said he asked\nme to resign, nevera member ever. . of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt_17109
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 25 2010 12:51 PM", "subject": null, "body": "the more time you have to announce the better. lye set up you and peter to meet in davos with darling, it would \nbe better afterwards to announce. I would go slowly, this can set the stage for lots to come. Obama really \nwants a fight. its crzy. \" They took bailout money and then......\" the problems are all inherited , not of his \ndoing, he reached out a hand to help and was taken advantage of-, typical but problematic."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt_17114
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt
subject: The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Rib", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/28/2019 7:41:52 PM", "subject": "The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors", "body": "For ur info\n\nHow Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors\nThe Washington Post\n\nTrump’s ‘statements of financial condition’ are a key component of inquiries by House Democrats and New\nYork investigators. Read the full story\n\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033335.txt_17125
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033335.txt
subject: Trump meets Christie as some advisers urge Kushner for chief of staff: sources Reuters
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 11:21:04 AM", "subject": "Trump meets Christie as some advisers urge Kushner for chief of staff: sources Reuters", "body": "https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-kushner/some-trump-advisers-tell-him-to-consider-kushner-as-\nchief-of-staff-sources-idUSKBN10C33A"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt_17126
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt
subject: Re: on another subject... gates and ed
messages:
  [{"sender": "roger schank", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gives about $200 million a year in elementary and secondary education grants and is pressing for some of the same changes that Obama wants, such as paying teachers based on student test scores."}, {"sender": "roger schank", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:49 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "they are sending their rep here on the second week of dec..\nwhy exactly? not be convinced they are wrong\ndo you remember chaunce the gardner from \" being there\" . dimitri\nI see I wont win this battle so I give up\nby the way... the right criticism of what he wrote is that he took a very long time to get there; by that definition of intelligence you are correct"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["roger schank"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 31 2009 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "and the \"there\" to which he arrived is trivial, and that there only after a long journey.. , re gates.. they have now become frustrated , with the lack of success. bill is personally focused on online ed. he has spent the past couple of months searching for decent courses, and found few."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt_17128
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Haig, David", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/19/2018 3:19:49 AM", "subject": null, "body": "dear men\n\niam writing you both because 1 am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-\nculture co-evolutionist—without the genes\n\ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—-Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you\ntwo to the list\n\nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and 1 will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's\nassistant to add your names to the list\n\nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without\nthe egomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and have\n\nthem tell each other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense\n\nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply\nconcentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem\n\ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program\nunless you say otherwise, 1 will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe correctly,\n\nthat Trump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he must be\nopposed with full force on that basis\n\nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality and\nyou should know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher on\nevery detail large and small\n\nin haste and all best\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt_17131
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cecile de Jongh", "recipients": ["JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 29 2013 04:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Antigua: Land Of Sun, Sand, And Super Cheap Downloads\nby Jacob Goldstein\nhttp://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/01/28/170466137/antigua-land-of-sun-sand-and-super-cheap-downloads\n\nSun, sand and super cheap downloads.\nAny day now, you might be able to download Argo, Lincoln and Les Mis for a dime a piece. Microsoft Office could go for a quarter. A song might cost a penny. And it could all be perfectly legal under international law.\n\nAs part of a long-running trade dispute, the tiny island nation of Antigua and Barbuda (population: 90,000) won the right to use the intellectual property of U.S. firms — without having to pay any royalties or licensing fees.\n\nAt a meeting in Geneva today, the country got the final go ahead from the World Trade Organization.\n\nThe fight goes back to the 1990s, when a bunch of online casinos set up shop in Antigua. After the U.S. cracked down on the casinos, Antigua complained to the WTO, arguing that the U.S. was unfairly protecting its domestic casinos in violation of free trade rules.\n\nAntigua won the case. Typically, when a country wins a case at the WTO, it wins the right to, say, put a tariff on goods from the losing country. But Antigua is so small that tariffs wouldn't have any noticeable effect on the U.S. economy.\n\nSo Antigua took another route: It asked the WTO to recover damages in the form of intellectual property, and the WTO said yes. If this seems likely to cause harm to innocents who had nothing to do with the fight over online casinos, that's the whole point.\n\n\"It's so Bill Gates might ring up Obama and say, 'Why have I lost my copyright so you can protect gaming?\" Mark Mendel, the lawyer representing Antigua told me. (By \"gaming,\" Mendel means the U.S. casino business.)\n\nTo be clear, the Bill Gates reference was hypothetical. Antigua has not yet said what it plans to sell or how it plans to sell it. And whatever it sells, it's not going to be able to sell all that much of it. The WTO said Antigua can collect only about $21 million a year in damages.\n\nIn fact, Mendel says, Antigua really doesn't want to do this at all. What it wants is to cut some kind of deal directly with the U.S. that would revive the country's online gambling industry, or help create some other industry in its place.\n\n\"Antigua is still a very limited economy,\" Mendel said.\n\nAs recently as Friday, the U.S. and Antigua were still talking about settlement options, Nkenge Harmon, a spokeswoman for the U.S. government, told me in an email. And, she wrote:\n\n...if Antigua does proceed with the unprecedented plan for its government to authorize the theft of intellectual property, it would only serve to hurt Antigua's own interests. Government-authorized piracy would undermine chances for a settlement. It also would serve as a major impediment to foreign investment in the Antiguan economy, particularly in high-tech industries.\n\nWith warm regards,\nCecile"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt_17133
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "where are you / PR or new york"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "San juan...pick the jury monday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "for how long, you can hop to my island with your friend if you like, just give me 24 hrs notice otherwsie i ill be htre around the 19th"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "2-3 weeks but Not sure how it will roll....supposed to be serious riots here may 1....lefties are pissed and trump said p.r. can fuck iself....what's with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "4/29/2017 6:57:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "new york fun your girl is in the DR. i have no idea"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030363.txt_17134
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030363.txt
subject: RE: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 22:58", "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Over crests and furrowed field\nWirey talons arching back\nEmpty roosts the plagued aspise\nRevel in their bloodied eyes\n\nWe fight on.\n\nThanks for sharing the foxhole.\nBest\n\nJes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt_17135
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt
subject: Fwd: Off the record trump
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:40:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Off the record trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please check every false allegation with me before repeating to others.\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031215.txt_17160
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031215.txt
subject: Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #
messages:
  [{"sender": "behnbom@aol.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/19/2017 2:09:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHuge thanks for giving BBB another chance!!We have 200 quite fantastic young women \nincluding a minister, an ambassador-Lisa! a professor -your Ml-a princess-Sofia! and \nthe other 196 \nare doing pretty good as well...lots of young girls in Sweden now dream of joining \nBBB...we really build something \nunique and worthwhile!! Young dean at Stockholm School of Economics is an idiot to \nthrough it all out but \nnow its time to develop it smartly! I will be doing a famous Summer radio program in a few \nweeks in Sweden, \n1 million listeners...among other things, I will talk about the girls..(and my blind date long \nago with a Donald \nTrump.. ha ha!) Anyway, please see details for the money transaction below - Edyta is my \nbanker ann a super \nperson! - I am leaving tomorrow night if anything? Also, if you send me a cell phone \nnumber, I can start sending \nyou photos from BBB, much easier than e-mail. \nTACK sweetheart for continuing believing in BBB! Kram BE \nBarbro C. Ehnbom \nChairman, Swedish-American Life Science Summit"}, {"sender": "Edyta.Wynberg", "recipients": ["behnbom"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 19, 2017 9:05 am", "subject": "SV: BBB AB konto #?", "body": "Hej Barbro! \nBeneficiary name: BBB AB \nBeneficiarys bank: SEB ( Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken) \n106 40 Stockholm \nBeneficiarys bank SWIFT address/BIC: ESSESESS \nBeneficiarys account no: \nIBAN: IBAN: \nVi hors \nKram \nEdyta"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033272.txt_17165
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033272.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2018 4:57:53 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump is due to arrive PBI Friday 6pm and depart Sunday 8:30pm\n\nTimes may change, I’11 keep you posted.\n\nTeterboro is an arrival gateway to PBI when TFR is in effect, NO airMarshal is needed, just 24hour\nadvance Passenger list and Prescreening at departure airport.\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031805.txt_17168
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031805.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, itis sad. itis apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. the spy trades were the results of a rank amateur... you took a position on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. why? because the options are cheaper? knowing full well that time premium was running. first silly move. I allowed as promised to give you authority. you set a target. it hit the target, you moved it back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, no discipline and as a percentage of investment. a one day dip of 25%. wanting to buy the higher strike, is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. re broadcom. the crack happened in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could. would. Had you told me, jeffrey I'd like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow! can learn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money. do well and prosper. If it were not you, this would have ended months ago. we should work on a solution. not sure yet what shape it takes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033266.txt_17175
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033266.txt
subject: wolf interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2018 5:03:27 PM", "subject": "wolf interview", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/05/people-say-trump-is-like-a-child-fire-and-fury-author-michael-wolff-"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031811.txt_17179
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031811.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry , sorry, itis sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a\nmistake. . the spy trades were the results of arank amatuer.. youtook a postion on the direction of the\nmarket. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper.\n\n? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to\n\ngive you authority. . yousetatarget. . it hit the traget , you moved in back. based on media reporting on\ntrump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong\ntiming , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the\nhighter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I\nhave taught this for many years. and your grade isanF. notone goodmoveinmany. ._ re\n\nbroadcom. the crack happend in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no\n\nanalysis. , thisisno way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to\ndo as you promised you could. would.. Had youtold me, jeffrey Id like to try a new job asa\n\nmanager lets start slow I can learn. 1 would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew\nthe risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. ._ If it were not\n\nyou, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030679.txt_17196
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030679.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Bilge, this year's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Steven Pfeiffer", "Rich Kahn", "Joana Vicente"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:31 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Jeffrey; every year I beg you to come and every year you don't. I will sit with you this year. If you bail, please let me know ASAP. You will have four seats with me. Xoxo peggy"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffery"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Hi Jeffery —\n\nI just wanted to follow up on a couple of notes. I have been coordinating with Richard Kahn (copied), and I have sent along to him the invoice and donation letter. So, we are all set on that front.\n\nI also wanted to circle back around on Peggy's note below. Will you indeed be attending the ceremony this year? Also, you had indicated you would have three additional guests as well. If you are available to attend the ceremony, please let us know, as well as to provide us with the names of your three guests. (Security is extra tight this year, with honoring Al Gore and all, and everyone's names have to be on the list to attend).\n\nThanks so much, and look forward hearing more on this.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "me,"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 7:17:42 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Perfect, thanks so much!\n\nBest,\nSteven"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031567.txt_17198
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031567.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that sold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "In addition my art guyd said the painting wasn't very good"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:40:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You have an art guy?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033500.txt_17208
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033500.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [mailto ae", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didn't forget about this...\n\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [mailto", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of TTT going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [mailto ae", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [mailto", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030651.txt_17214
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030651.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, February 3, 2017 7:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does he turn on bannon soon as bannon is getting too much attention and power"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 12:39:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "U r so right Bannon will be gone by Sept - too out front taking glow off DJT"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026033.txt_17217
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026033.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747  \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <1.111>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff < >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff < >"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if \nwe wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff < >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff < >"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, lye set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff < >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "cool. great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <1.111>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im happy to go to him. if he is shy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He is not so much shy, as paranoid. I have to contact him through his wife on a burner phone, which they \ndon't reliably check. But have queried."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "They came back to New York yesterday. He would like to meet, tho wary of being seen, etc. I will work it \nout."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <1.111>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "woudl you like to ask him to dinner tomrrow night you me and woody my house"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 1:29:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "My guess is that he will be too paranoid. He believes NYP photographers are following him. But will ask."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030889.txt_17218
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030889.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikoli", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/3/2011 2:40:39 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence. \nI am curious what you think about Vanity fair piece? \nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew? \nWho would know that? Some of your employees?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "in paris„ emailed steve - no response yet„ you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be \nan eye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. . \nhttp://www.thedailybeast. com/b lo gs-and-storie s/2 0 1 1 -04-0 1 /bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-j effrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032636.txt_17222
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032636.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2017 4:11:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is the point of this he is totally divorced from reality?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Sunday, October 15, 2017 5:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "“Tn the last 10 months, we have followed through on one promise after another,” Mr. Trump told the Values\nVoter Summit in Washington. “I didn’t have a schedule. But if I did have a schedule, I would say we are\n\nsubstantially ahead of schedule.”"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024624.txt_17226
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024624.txt
subject: Re: rather long and a few typos
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["\"For the American Male\") was published the year before Playboy to whom it has often been compared, and back in the day tried to be seen as slightly hipper, more youthful and considered a bit more clever than its big name rival. Almost an anti-establishment Playboy. A slogan stated: \"Your dad bought Playboy, you bought Cavalier.\""], "timestamp": "Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: rather long and a few typos", "body": "REMEMBERING CAVALIER MAGAZINE\nLAUNCHING A MAGAZINE\nMy friend Michael Simmons, who has been the editor of National Lampoon and High Times, observes that Cavalier hired fine scribes. A few examples: Thomas Pynchon, Philip Roth, William Saroyan, Isaac Asimov, Theodore Sturgeon. Cavalier was launched by Fawcett Publications in 1952.\nMen's magazine Cavalier (motto: \"For the American Male\") was published the year before Playboy to whom it has often been compared, and back in the day tried to be seen as slightly hipper, more youthful and considered a bit more clever than its big name rival. Almost an anti-establishment Playboy. A slogan stated: \"Your dad bought Playboy, you bought Cavalier.\"\n\nI BECAME A COLUMNIST\nI was invited to write a column, named \"The Naked Emperor,\" for Cavalier, that was beginning to publish underground writers and artists. They paid me $1,000 a month. My first column was a report on an auction of two-inch squares from the hotel bedsheets slept on by the Beatles during their first trip to America.\nThere were 300 screaming young girls, off on a fetishist's holiday. Obviously, there wouldn't be enough items to go around, but it was announced that the Beatles' unwashed towels and bed linens were to be cut into two-inch squares and sold for $1 each. The price included a notarized statement of authenticity.\nMy second column was about Lenny Bruce—titled \"Lenny the Lawyer,\" since he defended himself in trials. He was arrested for obscene performances only because there were no blasphemy laws. I went to the bank and deposited my check, withdrawing half of it in cash, a $500 bill. Lenny was alone in his hotel room on Christmas Day when I presented it to him. And, with a large safety pin, Lenny attached the $500 bill to the outside breast pocket of his denim dungaree jacket.\nAFTER JFK ASSASSINATION\nIn another column of mine, \"Jack Ruby and His Dirty Little Secret,\" it began, \"Lenny Bruce told me how all the night club comics used to [know about] Jack Ruby's 'tattoo of a lady's schmutzik (translate: pussy) in his armpit.'\" If it wasn't a fact, I was quite willing to settle for an apocryphal allusion which nevertheless crystallized the entire personality of that alleged murderer who wanted so very much to be liked.\nI say alleged because upon Ruby's own death, Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade said he would dismiss the murder charge against him, a promise which has since been kept, although no such posthumous grace was ever officially bestowed on Lee Harvey Oswald. See, they grant you retroactive innocence only in the face of innumerable witnesses who were present at the actual event through the miracle of inadvertent televised coverage.\nNow Jack Ruby's dirty little secret has been forever sealed away in his armpit by the hymen of history. Oh yeah, and at Lenny's funeral, that safety pin was still attached on his jacket.\nJULES SIEGEL\nTwo years before Lenny's death, with his permission I published his obituary in my own magazine, The Realist. Before the issue went to press, he called his mother and a few others to let them know it would only be a hoax. The point was that he couldn't get work and his work was his life so he might as well be dead. And if people regretted that they hadn't helped him, well, now they could have a second chance because he was still alive. The obituary evoked inquiries from newspapers, wire services, foreign publications, radio and TV.\n\"What's the meaning of it?\" one editor asked me. \"There's a lot of excitement at the city desk.\"\n\"That is the meaning of it.\"\nA few years later, without my permission, Jules Siegel, the editor of a short-lived magazine, Cheetah, published a fake obituary of me. I thought it was funny. An Associated Press reporter called, and I explained that it was a hoax.\n\"Are you sure?\" he asked.\n\"Of course. I would tell you if I was dead.\"\nSiegel started writing for Cavalier. His first assignment was a profile of Sterling Hayden, an actor best known in Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Journalist Adam Ellsworth described Siegel's \"Goodbye Surfing, Hello God!\" with his most famous example of rock journalism, but his most revolutionary was his article, \"The Big Beat.\" It appeared in the Playboy-esque Cavalier magazine in 1965 and was one of the earliest writings he'd ever seen on the development of rock and roll, from slaves singing in chains on their way to America to Bob Dylan \"going electric\" at the Newport Folk Festival.\nThen Jules' friend, Arthur Kretchmer, became Cavalier's managing editor. \"When the editorial director later resigned,\" Kretchmer said, \"there was a 24-hour hiatus before the new editor arrived.\" Siegel and Kretchmer had been discussing the possibility of publishing an issue on rock and roll, so to make it happen, Kretchmer went into the office at night and retyped the magazine's schedule to include their ideas.\nWhen the new editorial director started, Kretchmer handed him the schedules and said, \"Here's what we're working on.\" The new editorial director suspected nothing and the rock and roll issue went ahead. Once the laughter died down, Jules talked for a good 25 minutes about some of the ups and downs of his writing career and how hard it is to make a living as any kind of a writer, let alone a \"rock journalist.\" and the people who created it, seriously.\nNow everybody writes about rock and roll that way. Jules was one of the people who did it first. \"Goodbye Surfing, Hello God!\" is Jules's most famous example of rock journalism, but I think his most revolutionary is his article \"The Big Beat.\" It appeared in the Playboy-esque Cavalier magazine in 1965 and is one of the earliest writings I've ever seen on the development of rock and roll, from slaves singing in chains on their way to America to Bob Dylan \"going electric\" at the Newport Folk Festival.\nJules Siegel died of a heart attack on November 17, 2012 at the age of 77. He was a brilliant author, but neither Rolling Stone nor the New York Times honored him with an obituary. Not even a fake one.\nCOMIC STRIPS\nArt Spiegelman tells me his work at Cavalier 50 years ago:\nI was first invited into the mag to do two full-color comix pages in 1969 (when being printed in color was a Very Big Deal for me as was Getting Paid more than 25 bucks for a drawing), somehow in proximity to a big article on underground comix. It was around the time Vaughn Bode was made a regular contributor to the magazine. They were running some Crumb \"Fritz the Cat\" pages. All thanx to their hip, laid back and kind editor, Alan LeMond.\nI also did some gag cartoons, short strips and occasional illustrations for Cavalier (one especially bad drawing for a story by Bruce Jay Friedman, I recall). My work in 1969, as an apprentice underground cartoonist taking too many drugs was really, really awful so I'm grateful for the editor's hip and laid-back kindness. But, hey, I was proud to be in a mag that published pieces by Pynchon, Manny Farber and you.\nBy the time I'd gotten incrementally better as a cartoonist in the first half of the 1970s I was regularly doing illustrations for soft-core fiction stories in Cavalier's low-rent sister mags, Dude, Gent and Nugget (even wrote a story or two there and got several of my San Francisco comix cronies (Spain Rodriguez, Bill Griffith and Justin Green) illustration gigs with Alan for those mags as well.\nCOMING AND GOING\nI wrote some movie reviews for Cavalier. I recall that Midnight Cowboy was 50 years ago. I always went to two screenings. The first one I would go stoned with magic mushrooms. The second one I took notes. However, I got fired by Cavalier.\nThey declined to publish a particular column—my review of MASH as though it were a Busby Berkeley musical called Gook Killers of 1970—ostensibly on the grounds of bad taste, but I learned that three wholesalers had told the publisher they were pressured by the FBI and would refuse to distribute Cavalier if my name appeared in it.\nOn top of that, my name was on a list of sixty-five \"radical\" campus speakers, released by the House Internal Security Committee. The blacklist was published in the New York Times, and picked up by newspapers across the country. It might have been a coincidence, but my campus-speaking engagement-bookings stopped abruptly. It felt just like a film.\nOH, WELL\nIt was over for me, but it had been fun—like the issue with only the one large red headline on the Cavalier cover: \"BEAT 'EM SENSELESS FIRST\"—THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER . . . \"Ironically,\" I wrote, \"it is this concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much-misunderstood free-speech imbroglio at the University of California in Berkeley.\"\nThe sit-in lasted till 3 a.m. Next day, October 1, 1964, ten tables were manned again, and a campus policeman approached one of the tables (manned by the Congress of Racial Equality) where a dozen persons were seated. One was singled out and placed under arrest. But before you could say nonviolent demonstration, the police car was surrounded, its captors reaching as many as 3,000 students. During the late evening, bored fraternity men gathered and tossed lighted cigarettes and eggs on those sitting in the plaza. The demonstrators responded with silence.\nNext day, 450 police assembled on campus to remove the cop car and its arrested inhabitant, but an agreement to negotiate was reached and the demonstrators dispersed. One of the folk songs to come out of the Free Speech Movement incidentally, was If I Negotiate With You, to the tune of the Beatles' If I Fell in Love With You.\nOver the next couple of months there was a series of sit-ins and attempted negotiations, and then, on December 2, the infamous Sproul Hall sit-in. It took twelve hours for 800 students to be arrested by some 600 instructors of a new course called Introductory Police Brutality. These were from the lab notes students took.\nThere was a freshman co-ed at Berkeley who—long after she had forgotten what some professor spouted during an official lecture about Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment—would remember, with perhaps a twinge of frightened pride, learning from a fellow demonstrator that if she planned to go limp when the police arrested her, it would be an act of practical feminine foresight to remove the earrings from her pierced lobes in advance.\nSo, now in 2019, fighting over free speech has been happening heavily at Berkeley campus again. Meanwhile, Trump grabbed a pussy on the Statue of Liberty. Cavalier, anyone?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "5/15/2019 10:21:20 AM", "subject": "Re: rather long and a few typos", "body": "On September 14, 1964, Dean Katherine Towle announced that existing University regulations prohibiting advocacy of political causes or candidates, outside political speakers, recruitment of members, and fundraising by student organizations at the intersection of Bancroft and Telegraph Avenues would be \"strictly enforced.\"\nshouldnt you write an article 55 years later, on campus speech today."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023353.txt_17227
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023353.txt
subject: ulysses 2.0
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:53 AM", "subject": "ulysses 2.0", "body": "I realize it is only due to a lack of understanind of the job ahead. and not out of any sense of unwillingess to pay\n\n- as opposed to merely hiring people to set up a family office, someone will have to do_ the following- separate from the art partnership which is my responsiblity . there still needs to be a huge amount of work done for 2015,16. not to mention that brad at the moment is going to have train the incoming team?? your call strategic decisions re estate and other planning , sale of phaidon etc. . in addition setting up for the accounting for each strategy ie:\n\nincome, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise picasso, 1031 calder.. review and detailed oversite of IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, entity valuations (many ) tax _filings- disclosures, follow up of  grats, trusts ,defective trusts, Ilcs corps , trustees , partnerships. foreign corps. 100 bank account need to be"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033528.txt_17228
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033528.txt
subject: AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians’ future?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/10/2019 12:46:19 PM", "subject": "AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians’ future?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt_17241
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt
subject: truly outrageous S.iam so sorry for you & alan-
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 2 2015 11:14 PM", "subject": "truly outrageous S.iam so sorry for you & alan-", "body": "Jeffrey -\nPlease let me know if I can help inany way-\n\nStory below-\n\nMiami Herald\n\nSalacious new chapter in Florida billionaire’s sex scandal\nJeffrey Epstein\n\nFor years, the story of South Florida billionaire money manager Jeffrey Epstein— involving allegations of human trafficking, an international underage sex ring, a Palm Beach\n\nmansion, a private island inthe Caribbean, and an FBI investigation — has been tabloid fodder inthe United States and the United Kingdom.\n\nNow, Fort Lauderdale lawyer Brad Edwards is helping to write a new chapter inthis murky and sordid tale. Representing two alleged victims identified only as Jane Doe#3 and Jane\nDoe#4, Edwards filed a motionin U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach that alleges well-known criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York,\n\nwere involved in Epstein’s international sex ring.\n\n“There’s absolutely no kernel of truth to this story,” said Dershowitz, who represented Epstein. “I don’t know this woman. I’ve never been inthe same place with her. She’s made up\n\nthe wholestory completely from whole cloth.”\n\nEdwards’ motionrequests that his new clients join the case of two other alleged victims — identified as Jane Doe#1 and Jane Doe#2 in courtrecords — who are attempting to use the\nCrime Victims’ Rights Act to forcethe U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute Epstein for sex trafficking of children by fraud and use of interstate commerce to entice a minor to\n\ncommit prostitution, among other offenses.\n\nA wealthy Wall Streetmoney manager who had once attempted to purchase New York magazine, Epstein traveled the world in circles that included President Bill Clinton and\n\nbusinessman Donald Trump. Despite his vast fortune and mansion in Palm Beach, Epstein kept a low profile and wasn’t a regular inthe wealthy island’s social scene.\n\nThe low profile vanished in2005, when a woman contacted the Palm Beach police fearing that Epstein had molested her 14-year-old daughter. The girl told detectives she’d been\ninvited to Epstein’s mansion, where she was paid $300 after stripping to her underwear and massaging Epstein as he masturbated. Police then located acommunity college student\n\nwho gave a swornstatement that she had taken six girls, all betweenthe ages of 14 and 16, to Epstein.\n\nPolice referred the case to the FBI. In September 2007, Dershowitz helped Epstein negotiate a then-secret non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, which deferred\n\ntothe Palm Beach County State Attorney’s Office forcriminal charges, courtrecords show."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026755.txt_17243
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026755.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/5/2017 10:18:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt_17250
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 140 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014, 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Oh, sorry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Boy are you focused , I meant what number to call you on"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014, 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think I am pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "ok 1?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/21/2014 2:54:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Yep. Will be there."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026999.txt_17252
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026999.txt
subject: LIVE! Melinda Gates on How Empowering Women Changes the World
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/27/2019 8:29:59 AM", "subject": "LIVE! Melinda Gates on How Empowering Women Changes the World", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031193.txt_17262
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031193.txt
subject:
  Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme

messages:
  [{"sender": "Florence Anthony", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:08:55 AM EST", "subject": "efftrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text", "body": "Hot Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Crime Covered Up By President Obama\n\nBy Steven Hoffenberg\nPublisher/CEO\n\nLisa Twardeau died at the dirty hands of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's lies about the crimes he committed while working\natTowersinvestors.com.\n\nJeffrey Epstein looted Towers Investors of billions of dollars in ponzi crimes at the time Lisa became the wife of Steven Hoffenberg,\nwho was Epstein's boss at Towers Investors.\n\nEpstein defrauded the Towers Investors with a cover-up after taking $2 billion from Towers and depositing it into the Epstein Hedge\nFund Financial Trust Corp.\n\nLisa Twardeau died when she was going to expose the fact that Jeffrey Epstein looted billions from Towers Investors by ponzi\ncrimes.\n\nNow, from the grave, Lisa Twardeau slams arrogant ponzi crimes King Epstein in the tell-all book she wrote that reveals everything\nabout Epstein and the Feds' cover-up with President Obama.\n\nThe Feds are bad. They are covering up the Epstein ponzi crimes. The Lisa Twardeau book states that the FBI is violating the law\nwith this cover-up.\n\nThe book says President Obama told the Attorney General that Jeffrey Epstein was cooperating in an overseas banking crime, but"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:44:20 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023347.txt_17266
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023347.txt
subject: trying to bridge the gap.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "trying to bridge the gap.", "body": "you were at 30 30/ meat 6040. ./ proposal 50/25 and in additon I would be allowed to recommend 15\nfrom directly from your own foundation. All payments to be made in addtion to currently owed. so $40 on\napril 25 , $30 june 15 ,and the alreadly owed $10 as planned on oct 15. I would direct the 15 charity in the\nnext 12 months, and the last 25 to be paid on conclusion.\n\nleon"}, {"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spincll"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 PM", "subject": "previously sent", "body": "I heard you when you said you believed i had already been paid for the work that is now required. The art\npartnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so. . (\nFYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title. ) You will also recall that you\nrequired that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .( my work was\nnever to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of course should\nmake clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past agreement at all. I\npointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement right out of the box. you said\nyou preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in excess of even my own exalted opinion\nof my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my limited amount of my time-- way, way in excess of\nour agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in the amount still outstanding from last year if that helps ..\nHowever, As my best student , and my only one, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the\nrequired work yourself. I can put my whiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,\nshare moments ideas etc.. Iam of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route .\nalways . It will take a great deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine .\n\nWe are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning.So there are no surprises 50m for the\nyear. . or 30m for until 7/15. you can roll the balance for last year as a concession. half up front. no more all\nat the end. ive spoken to brad every day. more questions than answers. joslyn cannot be left unsupervised. his\nanswers are knee jerk . eillenn told me this , that the other"}, {"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:07 AM", "subject": "trying to bridge the gap.", "body": "you need to build an entire office from scratch. no question that was never my obigation, - systems , personel.\nfinance tax, bookeeping, ,office. complinace. investment. monitoring, banking loans coming due , review. gs\njpm gs, .. plane boat houses construction , new will,. phaidon sale. you are no further ahead today than my\n\nnov memo layed out = no real candidates. etc .. Ill redo the art partnership under new restrictions of course at"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032471.txt_17273
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032471.txt
subject: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:16:03 PM", "subject": "A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and that\nI'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy Ruemmler.\nI need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt_17275
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt
subject: Fwd: Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Fareed Zakaria GPS", "recipients": ["Fareed Zakaria GPS"], "timestamp": "June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4", "subject": "Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column.\nSteve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018\nROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn't have to be that way, says\nStephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. \"If the\nRepublicans continue on the path they are on,\" Bannon told me Thursday, \"they will lose 40 seats in the House and\nPresident Trump will be impeached.\" He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it's a strategy that\nTrump himself seems to instinctively get.\nBannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who\ntogether won half the vote in Italy's recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition —\nmixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. \"Europe is about a year ahead of the United\nStates.... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here].... You could begin to see the elements of\nBernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics.\"\n(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.)\nThe Republican Party's strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing\non the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. \"You have to nationalize the\nelection,\" he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of\ntaxes. \"This is going to be an emotional [election] — you're either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you're\nwith Donald Trump.... Trump's second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year.\"\nBannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. \"Immigration is about\nnot just sovereignty, it's about jobs.\" He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters\nwho see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and\nHispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, \"You're not going to be able to take the Hispanic and\nblack community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools ... to the great jobs in\nSilicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition ... from East Asia and South Asia.\"\nNow this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley\nhas much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled\nAsian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply\ngo elsewhere — Canada, Britain, Australia — and start successful companies there. And, in fact, there is lots of evidence\nthis is already happening.\nBut Bannon is right that this is a brilliant electoral strategy. The idea of greater immigration controls has an undeniable\nmainstream appeal. The Democratic Party is too far to the left on many of these issues, embracing concepts such as\nsanctuary cities, which only reinforces its image as a party that is more concerned with race, identity and\nmulticulturalism than the rule of law.\nWhere Bannon is analytic and historical, Trump is instinctive. But the president appears to see the situation similarly. I\nwrote last month that Trump would try to fight the midterm elections on immigration and added, \"Do not be surprised if\nTrump also picks a few fights with black athletes.\" In recent weeks, the president has labeled immigrant gang members\n\"animals\" and suggested that football players who silently protest police violence against blacks should leave the\ncountry.\nBannon thinks Trump is just getting started in nationalizing the election around immigration. He predicted the next\nmajor battle would be over the proposed wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. \"The wall is not just totemic. The wall is\nabsolutely central to his program.... As we come up on Sept. 30, if [Congress's] appropriations bill does not include\nspending to fully build his wall ... I believe he will shut down the government.\"\nSadly, but not surprisingly, Bannon doesn't think the fighting and the rancor in the United States are going away any\ntime soon. The \"battle between nationalists and globalists is at the fundamental roots of what America is, what America\nwill be,\" he said. \"This is very healthy, and ... I think this is going to go on for a long time.... We've got a lot more\nfighting and a lot more scar tissue to go over.\"\nYou can watch my CNN special \"The Steve Bannon Interview\" on Friday at 9 pm ET and Sunday at 10 am ET."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt_17280
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack nn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2018 2:56:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jerffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026291.txt_17293
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026291.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jii>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is itoverblown. ? all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. | recall many that told stories of\nhow they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "| am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i\ncan to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the\nsystem breaks down.\n\n| assume you were just flipping the channels."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt_17295
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt
subject: CONFIDENTIAL
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg P", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 5:19:07 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:48 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nepee nessa mm Fee Pm im PF SS SE EE SRS a rE EY"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:45 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt_17296
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrance Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey, \nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this. \nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with \nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,. \nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you: \nMr. Tarek El Sayed, \nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you. \nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match \nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, \nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase. \nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department \nwere as follows: \n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.) \nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr \nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations. \nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also \nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for \nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport \ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring \ncountries. \nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of \nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and \nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable. \nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide \nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be \nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you \nmay have seen already. \nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft \nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility. \nSincerely, \nLawrance Visoski \nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032317.txt_17299
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032317.txt
subject: RE: In NYC next week?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 12:54:06 PM", "subject": "RE: In NYC next week?", "body": "Ok. Glad you were able to see him.\nPlease tell me it is officially over for trump..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Attia"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:48 AM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": "I like sebastain, bottojmline ,nothigtodo, took some bloods."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Attia"], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2016, at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": "no week after"}, {"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt_17301
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "can you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you? Perhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it.\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-proposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific community.\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference call on Skype.\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "25 Aug 2017, at 09.49", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 10:15:52 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Until 3 p.m. EST.\nI will try to connect with you on Skype."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt_17302
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt
subject: Anonymous after Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 11:50:05 AM", "subject": "Anonymous after Trump", "body": "Are you tracking this?\nhttp://mic.com/articles/138244/anonymous-just-made-good-on-its-war-against-donald-trump-in-one-massive-cyberattack?utm_source=policymicF8&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social#.arje8k7P9"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032303.txt_17308
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032303.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:32:18 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Jeff\n\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt_17309
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 10:26:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt_17312
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 10:02:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Am 23.07.2016 um 04:41 schrieb jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>:\nCells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought?\nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\n\nVariation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain\nsize difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think\n\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational. every cell is different. size is didfferent. .\n\nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the\norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains. wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used\nas signals. as is spoken language.. what does social behavior mean , it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. =\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are\nall math , then political correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not\nemotinal for me.\n\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent\nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry,  ifiunderstand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 -\nLn. there aretimesT 1-Tn/ and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or\nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer\n\ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. .). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for\nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get\ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions )."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Exactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch\nup), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor\ndevelopment! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-\nlevel structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it\nis easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt_17315
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt
subject: crazy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "crazy", "body": "We are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating,\nhowever inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that\nthe various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the\nmost important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many\nrespects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and\ninternational news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means\nthe global 'reach’ of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts\nincluding US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales,\nformer President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al\nGore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul\nMcCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the\nmost important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - Po - or this email address.\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\n\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "crazy", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt_17331
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt
subject: Fwd: Rising Star
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2013 5:55:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Rising Star", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Lisa Rossi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "May 7, 2013 1:02:53 PM EDT", "subject": "Rising Star", "body": "Dear Jeffrey-\n\nWe are thrilled to announce that we are working with Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, one of the rising stars in the New York Congressional delegation. Sometimes referred to as \"Brooklyn's Barack\", he is a staunch supporter of President Obama and a progressive voice for the people of New York City. NY1 did a profile piece about his work on the vitally important Budget and Judiciary committees in Washington. You can watch the video here or read the text below.\n\nHakeem is committed to electing a Democratic majority in 2014 and is encouraging his friends to participate in the DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with President Obama this coming Monday night. Shoot us an email or give us a call at (212) 531-2858 if you would like to get involved with the dinner, or would like to get an opportunity to get to know Hakeem better. He is an impressive guy and who will be a progressive voice in New York politics for years to come.\n\nThanks,\nDarren Rigger, Lisa Rossi & Walter Swett\nDynamic SRG"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031622.txt_17338
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031622.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:43:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members ofa tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. _ but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,\n\nsocial media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\n\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to?\n\nI would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London.\n\nAny thoughts?\nPS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022930.txt_17341
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022930.txt
subject: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "James E. Hill [james.hill@abc.com]", "recipients": ["ms", "Pp", "Pd"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 2015, 4:36 PM", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings.\n\nThis is James Hill of ABC News. I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein — and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener. ABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with Virginia Roberts (formerly known as Jane Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week. We would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein. Can you tell me who among you I should be in contact with? Should you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business Wednesday.\n\nThanks kindly,\nJames Hill\nJames Hill\nABC News Producer\n190 N. State St.\nChicago IL"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025968.txt_17344
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025968.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at atime . put one\n\nin storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at a time."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.txt_17345
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.txt
subject:
  Re: FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old | US news | The Guardian

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10/21/2016 11:55:13 AM", "subject": "Re: FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old | US news | The Guardian", "body": "Rape lawsuits against Donald Trump linked to former TV producer | US news | The Guardian\n\nwww.theguardian.com » US News » Donald Trump\n\nJul 7, 2016 - Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been .... follows\na near-identical suit in California that made the same allegations against Trump and Epstein."}, {"sender": "stanpottinger", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:31 PM", "subject": "Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old | US news | The Guardian", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit\n\nHope all is well. We're due for a catch-up one day soon, you think?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033299.txt_17349
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033299.txt
subject:
  www.washingtonpost.com: In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post

messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry Josephson [iii", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/26/2016 9:55:27 PM", "subject": "www.washingtonpost.com: In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post", "body": "What a difference a week makes!\n\nIn new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead - The Washington Post\nwww.washingtonpost.com\n\nRead the full story\n\nBest,\nBarry J"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030528.txt_17350
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030528.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["PETER MANDELSON <_ i >", "max <gmax1@ellmax.com >"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 11:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com >"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-_ on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http:/Avww.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n\"lve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\"\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair\nstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nI remembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I\nhadn’t studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a\npackage at home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\n“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt_17354
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:12:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative . ? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests. . mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos . ? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they?, calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien, under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave, his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032229.txt_17357
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032229.txt
subject: Re: Heads up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2015 4:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "I think you should let him hang himself If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that, when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033137.txt_17361
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033137.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Are you enjoying la? I liked your trump exaggerations not lies"}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can't complain thus far..."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "11/7/2018 11:05:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dec visit me Caribbean"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030686.txt_17362
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030686.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-\nsmear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have \na bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised \nand shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not \ngoing to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's \nsake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--\nwhacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur \nSulzberger."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you and i are old news? :) ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 7:52:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Cross your fingers."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032839.txt_17365
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032839.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\nemmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:53:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They r all jumping ship - its totally crazy - it's time to worry\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt_17373
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt
subject: Re: Great seeing you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Great seeing you"}, {"sender": "Joel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from California.\n\nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest.\n\nLook forward to hearing from you."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 8:03 PM -0500", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel,, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. 1 will pick up all costs. thanks,,"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "i vote: have.him.call.me.or.better.eme.his.no.and.ill.set.sometgng.up.with.gerry.and.i...good.trip.to.ny.and.isle...joel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "jack a. aweekend when he could bring a friend would be appreciated"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Brian Baker jpm"], "timestamp": "1/7/2010 10:54:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "ES vse my name"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt_17383
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt
subject: Re: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\n[Article content about the case]"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2019, at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "i"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:51:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt_17384
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt
subject: Re: Subject to change
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "4/23/2017 11:20:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "you can read the guardian article on the alleged 13 year old. put up to it bya pr guy, former jerry springer sales pitch man"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "So the publisher wants me to trim down 700 to 400 pages in “The Best of...” collection. Tsk tsk. Below will be the revised mini-essay to serve as the final piece. Although I detest Trump, to be fair, I realized, thanks to you, that I had no evidence that he had raped a 13-year-old, though I did have have evidence that, as an adult, there was evidence that she made an accusation. Also, I added another sentence with a positive ending. Meanwhile, Happy Earth Day.\n\nThe Last Word: Yikes!\nWhen George W. Bush was elected president in the year 2000, it was due to the electoral college (a rigged system which originally intended to prevent slaves from voting and evolved to gerrymandering), even though Bush’s opponent, Al Gore, won the national popular vote. Hillary Clinton was elected senator that year, and she announced that the first thing she would do was to get rid of the electoral college. A few years later, as a columnist for the New York Press, I sent her a letter asking about the status of that promise. She didn’t reply.\n\nOn November 8, 2016, a crooked businessman, liar extraordinaire, bragging pussy-grabber, make-America-white-again, anti-choice, anti-Semite, fake Christian, accused rapist of a 13-year-old in 1994 (she canceled a press conference one week before the election because of death threats if she filed a lawsuit), climate-change hoaxer, twitter addict, homophobic, apprentice politician, fucking fascist, and Vladimir Putin’s “useful idiot,” namely Donald Trump, who was elected as an insanely narcissistic dictator based on the electoral college, whereas his opponent, Hillary Clinton, won the national popular vote by almost three million individuals galore, to no avail.\n\nIrony lives. But the monster has inadvertently awakened a population to resist."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030719.txt_17385
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030719.txt
subject: RE: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "A while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mark L. Epstein"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "All good. Bannon with me"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mark L. Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mar 21, 2018, at 09:37", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "and i thought- I had tsuris"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:54 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "You and your boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie Get Hard.\nSent via tin can and string."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mark L. Epstein"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 21, 2018 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "you mean DONNI TEE"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 2:54:13 PM", "subject": "RE: hey", "body": "I'd rather be in Donni Dee's shoes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt_17387
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way out. .. execution not to his liking but...... on another note , what were you thinking about me in the book, with what moniker"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <3>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what I think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of Trump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff.\n\nDoesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him until the end."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnks for letting me sound smart :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 8:25:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I haven't done that party yet..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt_17394
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HE. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island withhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:22:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033306.txt_17398
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033306.txt
subject: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming - NYTimes.com
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2016 12:00:41 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming - NYTimes.com", "body": "http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/technology/peter-thiels-embrace-of-trump-has-si licon-valley-squirming.html?referer=http://ww.drudgereport.com/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt_17409
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2018 5:52:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "is this a sign trump will escape muller investigation unharmed. .\n\nhttps: //ww. cnbc.com/2018/04/20/democratic-party-fi les-suit-al leging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-\nwiki leaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-election-report.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026609.txt_17413
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026609.txt
subject: Fwd: January 23, 2015
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffreyepsteinorg@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 24 2015 05:22 AM", "subject": "Fwd: January 23, 2015", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM", "subject": "January 23, 2015", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nFurther to emails of January 21, I crossed an image of a rare 17th Century Marble Bust of Roman Emperor Vitellius you purchased from me during the second half of the 90's.\n\nI recalled upon many occasions you visiting Bennison, Pimlico Road and being extremely respectful and courteous, as Miss Maxwell was on each occasion.\n\nFrom recent media reports about you and our Prince Andrew, I do not believe you, Miss Maxwell and Prince Andrew would undermine your conduct the way reports are suggesting.\n\nI feel for you all and hope this episode clears so you can concentrate on your professional activities that do positive things for our countries.\n\nYou may have heard a report an interesting report conducted by a genius Lawyer Michael Shrimpton - Michael Shrimpton youtube - Exposes Ted Heath (and others)\n\nThe report is shocking and is not a hair-line what you are wrongly accused of (based upon our many meetings).\n\nFurther David Dicke reports on the USA former President George W. Bush Senior which again is shocking, unbelievable, unacceptable...\n\nMr Michael Shrimpton & Mr David Dicke are worth watching if you haven't yet crossed their researching of public figures that have (literally by reports) got away with murder.\n\nPlease find attached an image of Vitellius, pair of 19th Century Medici Lions (that are perfect for one of your estates), emperor Vespasian and a pair of Piranesi Engravings for your consideration.\n\nDo not hesitate to contact me should you require more details.\n\nWarm regards,\n\nYours sincerely,\n\nMark Green.\n\nCel.\n\nBEST WISHES TO THE THREE OF YOU!!!"}, {"sender": "mcgreenantiques", "recipients": ["jeffrey <jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org>"], "timestamp": "Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:04", "subject": "January 21: A Pair of 19th Century Carved Sicilian Marble Figures of the Medici Style Lions-", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nHope you are well!\n\nPlease find attached images of:\n\nA POWERFUL AND IMPORTANT PAIR OF 19TH CENTURY FINELY CARVED SICILIAN MARBLE FIGURES OF LIONS IN THE MANNER OF THE MEDICI LIONS\n\nDIMENSIONS: HEIGHT 77\" - 196 CMS (INCLUDING PLINTH BASES) x LENGTH 39\" - 99 CMS x WIDTH 16\" - 41 CMS\n\n£160,000= RETAIL\n\n£120,000= TRADE Plus 5% Commission\n\nTHE LIONS REPRESENT 'GRAND TOUR SOUVENIR' WORKS OF ART AND WOULD HAVE BEEN COMMISSIONED TO DECORATE THE GROUNDS OF AN HISTORICAL HOUSE\n\nThe original figures were commissioned by 'Ferdinando I de'Medici' and were excuted by Giovanni di Scherano Fancelli in c.1598, and accompanied by a mirror-image version by contemporary sculptor Flaminio Vacca (1538-1605).\n\nThe original pair remained in Rome until 1789, before being moved to Loggia dei Lanzi in Florence, where they can still be seen today. The two sculptures were hugely influential in eighteenth-century Europe: copies and versions can be found from landscape gardens to mantlepieces\n\nThe figures are museum quality.\n\nThe lots are currently located in Barnwell Manor, Barnwell, near Oundle, Peterborough, PE8 5PJ.\n\nThey are the finest examples of 19th Century 'Grand Tour Souvenir' works of art of 16th Century sculpture outside of a museum.\n\nShould you require more details please do not hesitate to contact me.\n\nYours sincerely,\n\nMark Green.\n\nCel."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt_17417
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:01:12 -0400", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "now that strauss kan girl will be shown to be a total liar, maybe your paper should jump on and show that s allegations re andrew are the same„ she also accused numnerous people of having sex with her,, dersh, ehud etc. not one newpaper had the balls to question her credibility"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I might be interested in that story. Would Andrew's people cooperate?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 8:26:40 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This girl fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. the da after she accused others. said in writing that she had no credibility, she was never 15 years, old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell. total horseshit„ the daily mail paid her money„ they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth.. Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew„ as many of my employees have. I have never misled you , this girl is a total liar, they authorities should check her austrailain immigration form, you could talk to dershowitz. I will ask if they will cooperate-Prince people"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029274.txt_17428
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029274.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <JMNII>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative . ? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests. . mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos . ? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien, under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave, his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "maybe you can ask why bernie nussbaum got vince fosters letter quickly, that is a hillary problem. he would smile then you can ask his realtionsjipwith the elctricians unions and maralago . and out you go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What's the thumb nail on Nussbaum/foster?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:21:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "nussbaum white house counsel.. hillary doing naughties with vince"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030725.txt_17430
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030725.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "On my way to Munich \nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "my assistant \nlondon. fun \nalso going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ?? \nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he's got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to in russia id appreciate it. . dont \nknow parties. ride to london . shes a futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:02:32 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am finding out what the plan is in Moscow - send me her number.I will fly from Moscow to Spain (not \nLondon) \nLet's discuss DB. Seeing Chairman today in Munich...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033094.txt_17431
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033094.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "6/6/2018 10:29:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "trump looking for attny, considering rifkin"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031795.txt_17439
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031795.txt
subject: Rez!!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon ii"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 6:45:14 PM", "subject": "Rez!!!", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [unknown]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM", "subject": "Rez!!!", "body": "Here we go again...\nhttp://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trum"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029593.txt_17444
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029593.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:45:45 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you give me a little bit of phrasing you think is optimal? I'm not sure I know how to ask her to join this company without asking her to be\n\npart of poetry in america. It does also seem to me perhaps relevant that Serena thinks of herself as a poetry person.\n\nFor people who think that way, maybe not nothing (hasn't been nothing to others) that a Harvard poetry professor seeks her wisdom on the art form?\n\nWould really appreciate your edit.\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "sorry , that was meant as a filler what is important is that she is joining the others priority . and not appearing on your show. !:) iinvite you to appear is DOA"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "this poem about childbirth and is not for children.\nIt's for adults and it raises awareness on the issues of discrimination against women athletes in sports\nand, against women of color in childbirth. These are Serena's big issues now.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "serena , bill clinon shaque and,,,,, have all on pbs. ? read poetry for children. I would love to have you\n\ndo the same........ blah blah blah do not say come on my show."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to Australia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next time you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar themes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt_17447
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt
subject: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al Seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2010 5:36:27 PM", "subject": "Results", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nThe bots did the sweep. Here are th\n\nYou have only one negative article left on\nthe Huffington Post article. The Huf\nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of\nmassive new and original con\nside readers.\n\nnew results\n\nWe managed to push it to post original con\nnot a single word\nto push it down\nly beast article,\ntheir own ef\ntent 1\nthe dal\nfron\nFington Post\nt down\nn ¢T ¢\nthe page\ntaken as of\n£ google,\nis extreme]\nto it,\nt on a daily basis with posting\n,aS it used\npage o\nlinks\neven furt\n\nand\nstuf\nand wording has muted\nScientists.\nthat was a major ef\nfF has been muted,\n\nWikipedia was an important victory,\nsearch engine results.\nfender or pedophile.\nPromotion of\n\nWe have promoted th\npreviously buried on page 5 of\n\nAnd,\nnew,\nwhile\nand subject\nadded on a minimum of\ncontent to the philan\noth\n\nThis was a big success.\n\nWe have stopped the hacking on your wi\ns pretty tame,\ntom. Care\nth\nfferent photo and\n\nYour wiki en\nthropic wo\ntry now i\nand pused to the bot\nfect immensely. We hacked\nand now has an\nentirely di\nto this day by Jessica,\nand off\nher,\nwhich\nterms that popped up automat\nrk,\n\nand\nf the\nis now\na minute ago.\nwhich is\nly hard\nto\nuploads\nfrom out\nto be at the\ntent to both the science and the\njust talk),\n\nall the way up to the\nfront pa\ngoogle search.\n\nthe sites\nar\nto volitility,\nrj\nfilled with your material.\nup,\nffrey epsteins,\na weekly basis.\n\nYour daily beast\nagainst you in\n\nbut would have liked them\nHuffington off page). We\nthat come of you on a goog]\nis s\nalso helped wit\nle search are not of\nstill at\nthe same way tha\nit,\nand in the direction\nespecial]\ny if new\n\nI have been\nthropic site as well as th\nger\nwe hoped,\nwhere it was\nthe\nSite,\nand bad\nful editing\nreplace\nand other pages are also\nthey are still\noriginal content is not\nforbideen t\nscienc\nSite,\nth you ima\n(still on the\nthe articles to been abl\nand the\nyour mug shot,\nges,\no add new\nand\nfirs\ne\netc\nt page,\nto push\nfirst images\nand trying to promote her sites\nt we try to depromote you."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029587.txt_17451
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029587.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito <q@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . itseemsima symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . atleast for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I’m good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["oi"], "timestamp": "3/4/2019 11:27:03 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026635.txt_17452
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026635.txt
subject: Tax Planning Under Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 3:37:46 PM", "subject": "Tax Planning Under Trump", "body": "not sure your thoughts on likelihood of his plan (with very little details) passing \nmy concern and thoughts are that if itemized deductions are capped at 200,000 you will be impacted by Trump \nplan \nyour itemized deductions on the last 2 years returns were as follows: \n2015 1,721,474 \n2014 739,139 \nthe two biggest items on your itemized are RE Taxes of approximately 600,000 per year and investment interest \nexpense from STC K-1 with the majority coming from boothbay \ni thought that 2016 may be a good year to contribute appreciated stock to gratitude or enhanced for three \nreasons: \na) potential cap on itemized per trump \nb) very low EDC income this year so your effective tax rate is higher \nc) if itemized stays however tax rates go down charitable deduction is worth more in 2016 \nGratitude & Enhanced Summary \nCash 4,738,854 \nEquities 3,792,177 \nFixed Income 2,199,792  \nTotal Value as of 10-31-2016 10,730,823 \nAlthough calculation below does not factor in growth i ran summaries how long foundations can continue to \nmake annual contributions at the following levels: \n600,000 17.88 years \n700,000 15.33 years \n800,000 13.41 years \n900,000 11.92 years \n1,000,000 10.73 years \nhttp://smolin.com/tax-planning-trump/?utm medium=email& hsenc=p2ANqtz-9cVvrtlu7t-\nPS2aTSDot MfPqLyf5nz-\nHEqo0OHZ2p1m4IPpx2ofWoKVEtA4VNoa5V7IKOjpCBUneblDWflemNH1V25wqIpsR66ZSueRTahNjres8  \n& hsmi=38093530&utm content=38093530&utm source=hs email&hsCtaTracking=04192ff7-d8f4-4bdc-\nac61-36ac99f6aa45%7C515b98b3-dbce-47cd-87ad-20d95c646158"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt_17456
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt
subject: your statement?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:14 AM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it iii I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort . She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island, , sex ona small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her \" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation. The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.txt_17468
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "That is true.\nInteresting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "last i looked (sic), you do not have ovaries."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "I hear you."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 8:35:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Home Boston. Will try to call"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023233.txt_17470
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023233.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spin"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "What should we do? the next two years in biz world appears to both you and I, very fragile. Im happy to have brad sit in ?\n\ntoday is Oct 15\n\nWith your full knowledge I paid out 8 mil to my staff before june, . soi guess I can safely assume that after consideration of all the things I did for the entire past year separate and apart from your unique free \"after care\" concept. , what you thought was ultimately fair was the contribution of 5 million to a foundation and a total of 2 million dollars to me.\n\nOffice, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax experience. . castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a bill) eva goes. outsource as much as possible... bookkeeping systems built from scratch,\n\nairplane restructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really want these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts activity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA re thinks . household and construction architects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family office... decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years.. insurance. operations. airplane , etc. . art foundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line banking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ) . airplane certificate, redone jetaviationredo. . paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM", "subject": null, "body": "josh's arrival cut short our needed conversation. I understand we have a difference of opinion. friends sometimes disagree, I shook on the 20 so you have no further obligation, none, I am willing to have brad karp hear both sides. as my view , you andi had an agreement. on phaidon /publishing, and then a long standing what you say is 28 , which is correct AFTer TAx. ,37 pre. . that was our numbers. I was clear what i thought the transactions were worth. far less than full. alanetc. , had you said i will pay you only 20. i would have said ill pass. you never told me that 50-60 the number that i put on the table at the very beginning was not right. you asked that i lay out my plan step by step. and what i believe would have been the fair thing to do is say to me, I will pay you only 20 if you do asiask, not tell me for the first time only after i laid it all out. had it not been you, 1 would have required payment in escrow. BEFORE _ fyithe reason I sent you an invoice so that if you decided that you wanted me to continue this year . it would be applied to last years income. I think today was a beginiing for you. I am glad I will meet wendy the 23, rd, . separate and aprt from being your sounding board for personal issues, I do not see my involvment moving forward."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella < La"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "this was sent four months ago, nothing has changed sent oct 15. before big transaction."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032756.txt_17471
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032756.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 1:50:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Love the guy...(you were deadass right)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030731.txt_17474
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030731.txt
subject:
  'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 10:16:04 AM", "subject": "'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019348.txt_17482
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019348.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 3:58:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "reacall , I am unaware of your playbook. however, whatever is good for you -- Im in. . I think meeting, the leaders of europe BEFORE he possible implodes is only good for many reasons. frankly, after you meet , you could explain what happened; they will all want advice.. ALL"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Well played sir"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["M1j"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:58:06 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels The former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between right-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections NEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who was Donald Trump's right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (II Movimento), right in the heart of Europe and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the European elections which will be held in spring 2019. Objective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor of the Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in support of NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist right, accused of plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in order to have labour at low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini. The ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in the European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and Rome — is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great \"populist international\" of which he has long since been dreaming. The Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of strategic advice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme European movements. Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and channeling funding. The aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of \"super group\" that if victorious can conquer up to a third of the European Parliament in the elections next May. Indeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own. The American strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US Congress — and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016 used data stolen from Facebook to try to influence the presidential election from which Donald Trump emerged victor. It is not a mystery that for a long time he courts nationalists of the right from East to West. And he has already met, among others, the Hungarian Orban, the French Marine Le Pen and the former leader of the British separatists Nigel Farage. The latter reappeared, coincidentally, on Friday in Pennsylvania, USA, to a fundraiser in favor of the Republican congressman Lou Barletta. Without forgetting the Italians of Lega and 5 stars. Of them, he said: \"If it works in Italy, we can import the model anywhere\". The Movement, which for now will count on a staff of 10 people, will be fully operational in 2019. In short, after the American midterm elections, where Bannon is fighting to influence the primaries supporting candidates potentially able to undermine the prospects of Republican establishment. But in the future the former spin doctor says he wants to spend more and more time in Europe. Also because the relationships with Trump have worsened after the revelations he made to Michael Wolff and published in the scandal book \"Fire and Fury\". \"Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Paradise,\" Bannon says now paraphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise. Hell in this case would be the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The \"army of darkness\" is already among us. In Sacratissimo Corde Iesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "II giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "What does this say???"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt_17484
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What do u hope?)) \nKind regards,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "16 Nov 2016, at 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hey Jeffrey!! \nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not? \nvrote: \nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling to NY \noften to see him and can catch up with you.. \nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-) \nHugs,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt_17490
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt_17492
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:05:51 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt_17495
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 3:26:46 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you call mc iy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:32 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the\n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me\nand you were so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt_17496
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yikes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2016, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/15/2016 1:38:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's a broad question."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt_17502
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 19 2014 09:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt_17505
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:35:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt_17516
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt_17520
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt_17522
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 1:38:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to \neurope tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table \nin new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff.. i m praying"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you \nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019412.txt_17525
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019412.txt
subject: FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Pinette", "recipients": ["Bill Gates"], "timestamp": "8/26/2013 4:17 PM", "subject": "Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "CbgC3 Press Snapshot\n\nHeadline\tJournalist\tOutlet\tFull Text\n[...article summaries and full texts follow...]"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <boris.nikolic@???>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 26 2013 02:46 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "See good article re balmer below.\nStill awaiting for call reply"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt_17543
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt
subject: Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Riis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2017 3:05:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article:\n\nManafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer\n\nTrump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort alerted authorities to Donald Trump Jr.’s infamous meeting\nwith the Russian lawyer during his father’s presidential campaign.\n\nManafort, who is facing increasing pressure from U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller, divulged Trump Jr.’s\nmeeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya about three months ago, Bloomberg reported.\n\nResponding to a congressional request for information, Manafort revealed the meeting and provided 300\ndocuments, although FBI agents went on to raid his Virginia home two weeks ago.\n\nTrump, responding to news of the raid, said, \"I was very, very surprised to see it....I've always found Paul\nManafort to be a very decent man.”\n\nInvestigators are looking into accusations of money laundering in an attempt to pressure Manafort into\ncooperating with the probe into the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia, two sources told Reuters.\n\n“Tf Mueller's team can threaten criminal charges against Manafort, they could use that as leverage to convince\nhim to cooperate,” said one of the sources.\n\nBut the former campaign manager’s spokesman Jason Maloni said, “Paul Manafort is not a cooperating\nwitness.”\n\nMaloni also told Bloomberg that Manafort was enlisting the services of a D.C.-based law firm Miller &\nChevalier,which focuses on tax law, to replace WilmerHale, where Mueller previously worked.\n\nMueller’s investigation has extended to global bank transactions involving Manafort, as well as his business\npartner Rick Gates and son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai.\n\nYohai, who is under investigation for real estate deals he made with Manafort, turned over documents to\nMueller’s probe more than two months"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt_17548
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt
subject: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 1:48:05 PM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift.\n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money.\n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking--Modernism) and including three episodes of tv.\n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBB), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more.\n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs.\n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250.\n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar_) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible.\n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. And I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media manager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a second stage."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019406.txt_17549
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019406.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "R. Couri Hay", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 07:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good morning Jeffery, \nThe Newsweek story is being written without your input as you read this. Lloyd Grove is not writing the story, he made a few calls but he \nwas taken off the project. This is for Newsweek, the magazine that is on the stands, not the website. It's still 1200 to 1500 words. \nAlexandra Wolfe needs to turn in a draft of the story by Monday. I've been subtly guiding Alexandra on your behalf, but would really like \nto formalize this job with your attorneys and then I would really need to give names and numbers of pro Jeffery power brokers for \nAlexandra to call. She has already called Donald Trump, Leon Black, and Les Wexner among others. I've given her Jonathans number, \nplease let me focus on this before its too late to spin this in your direction. I'm in all afternoon my office number is My cell \nis: My email i _________ \nCheers, \nCouri"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["R. Couri Hay"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 1, 2011 6:34 pm", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "I was told it was lloyd grove Not true? \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "R. Couri Hay", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 1, 2011, at 3:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nI hope I'm not bothering you, but this is information I think you need to know. Tina Brown has assigned a 1200 to 1500 \nword story with pictures about you for Newsweek and the deadline is next Wednesday. My good friend Alexandra Wolfe \nis writing the story; she called me within an hour of getting this assignment. If you hire me I feel confident that I can \npositively affect this feature on your behalf. That does not mean I can control it completely or that they won't reference \npast problems. However, I can assure you that the story will be fair and balanced and that your side will be represented \nintelligently. The story will be about your reemergence in New York post your previous problems. The party you gave for \nPrince Andrew will be a big part of it. I suggest we arrange for interviews with figures who have seen the good things that \nyou have done in business, science, and philanthropy. I'll be home after 7:30 tonight. My home number is \n, or you can call my cell at . I will also be in tomorrow morning. I suggest you act swiftly in this matter. \nAs I told you when we first met this story wont go away and you need to take positive steps to change your image. \nCheers, \nCouri"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt_17551
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt
subject: Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/6/2015 12:41:53 AM", "subject": "Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run", "body": "Funny article\n\nBill Clinton reportedly had an intriguing\nphone call with Donald Trump weeks\nbefore his campaign launch\n\nRudolph W. Giuliani, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton attend the 2008 Joe Torre Safe\nat Home Foundation Golf Classic at Trump National Golf Club on July 14, 2008, in\nBriarcliff Manor, New York.\n\nFormer President Bill Clinton and real-estate magnate Donald Trump reportedly\nhad a phone conversation in May, only weeks before Trump launched his campaign.\n\nAccording to a new report from The Washington Post, Clinton called Trump in May\nand \"encouraged Trump's efforts\" to become more influential within the GOP,\naccording to four \"Trump allies\" and one Clinton associate \"familiar with the\nexchange.\"\n\nFrom The Washington Post's Robert Costa and Anne Gearan:\n\n\"Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that\nClinton encouraged Trump’s efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and\noffered his own views of the political landscape.\"\n\n\"The tone of the call was informal and Clinton never urged Trump to run, the four\npeople said. Rather, they said, Clinton sounded curious about Trump’s moves\ntoward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with\nfrustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.\"\n\nHillary Clinton, Bill's wife, is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for\npresident in 2016.\n\nThe Clintons have long had ties with the real-estate magnate. As The Post notes,\nHillary Clinton attended Trump's wedding in 2005, and the reality-television\npersonality donated money to her past Senate campaigns, though he has also"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt_17553
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt
subject: Re: Got another call from Connelly..
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/27/2017 2:56:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was \nasking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea -- I think he \nis doing some Trump-related digging too. \nAnyway, for what its worth... \nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032795.txt_17559
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032795.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 10:34:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt_17566
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:36:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing \nPOTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u. \nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared. \nHow guilty is Donald? \nOf crudity surely \nOf gross ignorance surely \nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely \nOf being over line on family profiting very likely \nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely. \nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear \nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain \nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did. \nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by \nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026124.txt_17573
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026124.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029975.txt_17574
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029975.txt
subject: are they still bothering you/ if so what about
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20 2015 12:14 AM", "subject": "are they still bothering you/ if so what about", "body": "have to hand it to msi I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort . She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. (while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island, , sex ona small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation . The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027067.txt_17577
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027067.txt
subject: Re: Trump@War
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sean Banno", "recipients": ["Steve Bannor", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "Dan Fleuette"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 8:26:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump@War", "body": "Just sent to you from my ProtonMail"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve@arc-ent.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 4:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump@War", "body": "• Can we get Jeffrey latest version of film"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt_17579
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:22:48 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Thanks.. I need to get this or something to them quickly. I do feel the need to respond to each of their claims otherwise they would say I don't deny them.. Will include a short preamble. I am going to cc the letter to the Buzzfeed lawyers. I figure I will see whether the buzzfeed story gets any traction at all, or appears before putting on my web site, or tweeting and facebooking it. LMK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 4:18 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "normaly thier strategy will be to take back your defense to the accusers. and attack each one. if they find you are right they will leave out. and only go with the conflicted. I think you should include short concise cover letter. that you would like published in it entirety. it can refence your attacjment that you will put on your web site? . that goes into more details but in general , these are false. they were either investigated and found lacking or ignored. etc. often they throw out the near publishing date merely to get you to ansser."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected. .so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers falsely and inaccurately to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft:\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss:\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt_17588
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2017, at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wash this week. what time see apt"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2017 10:28:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This week was totally bananas. Did Andrea Mitchell yesterday to discuss Trump/DOJ. \nApartment appointment is Aug. 2 at 4 pm."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt_17603
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt
subject: Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza
messages:
  [{"sender": "Daniel Siad <danielsiad@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza", "body": "Hello Jeffrey\nA great friend of mine rented Huge House in Ibiza so invited a lots of girls from Russia all models because they will be doing the shootings down there for several magazines with and great scout named Tigrane He use to scout For Trump but he deosnt work for him any more he coming with 12 girls the first weeck 22th of Jully then 13 others the second weeck from the th of 5 th of august\nHe would like to meet you . I just called Jean Luc to see with him if he can come too that will be great to build this great network for Mc2\nPlease let me know if you can come to spend some time with us\nMy best regards"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Siad"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 16 2010 04:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza", "body": "tigran has the best taste next to you.. i am happy to meet him, he had a girl named= in paris, that he had told many bad things about me."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt_17608
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tim Zagat"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 4:26:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im back in ny after the 15th of sept"}, {"sender": "Tim Zagat", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI'm sending you a copy of House of Trump, House of Putin in case you haven't already received 10.\n\nWhen are you available to get together?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt_17622
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick , Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused . Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur #1 will call u"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:32:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He said that because he wants to discredit or downgrade u with the person he said it to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt_17624
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i hope the fasting is easy for you.. see you soon ?"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Want to know what you think.. is there a war coming in our region?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "May 11, 2019, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "WASHINGTON — Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is deriding President Donald Trump as foolish for trying to oust him. Kim Jong Un is testing Trump's \"love\" — and his resolve — in the North Korea negotiations. And Iran's leaders are finding new ways to threaten the U.S. and to defy the president's \"maximum pressure\" campaign."}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/11/2019 7:50:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well that is good to know bcz i got concerned lately Ii"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026551.txt_17625
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026551.txt
subject: Fwd: Foreign Policy magazine: The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets):
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem Po", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/24/2012 4:28:07 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Foreign Policy magazine: The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets):", "body": "http://www. foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/04/23/the ayatollah under _the bedsheets\n\nThe Ayatollah Under the\nBed(sheets)\n\nIn the Islamic Republic of Iran, all politics may not be sexual, but all sex is political.\n\nBY KARIM SADJADPOUR | MAY/JUNE 2012"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt_17626
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:08:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt_17627
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid ay"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fethullah-gulen-tayyip-erdogan-foe-us-\nremoval _us_ Sbedf361e4b0510a1f2f16e9"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So fucking much going on"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid ay"], "timestamp": "11/16/2018 11:52:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, 1 no one asking how the turks got that recording? 2 for you - steve says the republicans also want\ntrump gone. he is now a liability"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt_17635
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr. ii"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:52:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "when we bet that marla maples was pregnnat , i olst and sent him 10,000 dollars of baby food. the hawain tropic girls all have photos he was the judge"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. iii.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon UY", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die.\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index\n.htm!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt_17646
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt
subject:
  Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 14, 2014 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Oct 14, 2014 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "I'm almost home. Call there in 10?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 12:23:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt_17647
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Harry Fisch"], "timestamp": "11/9/2016 7:57:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "We should pay attention, too, to the many men whose lives are about to get significantly worse under Trump. \nImmigrant men. Gay men. Black men at risk of police violence. Men who rely on the Affordable Care Act for \ntheir health insurance. Men who reject traditional masculinity. And even the men and women who voted Trump \nto victory — white people who traded racial resentment for the kind of progressive change that would have \nimproved their lives, too. They surely think feminism has nothing to offer them compared with a promise to \nrestore them to their former position of unearned power; they are about to see how wrong they are. \ndear. I would like to confirm our recent and frankly very perplexing conversation. I had agreed to your \nproposal and that of Arthur Klein, . salary, sharings , responsbilities. etc. Arthur and I were clear and had \nagreed that expenses would be in the form of a stipend. What I think I heard from you is that you no longer can \nstand by the proposed agreement. . If that is true, please confirm to me in writing. I am very surprised , and \nfind it difficult to understand"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt_17651
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt
subject: Re: (no subject)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets with it thanks Jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt_17652
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt
subject: Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Yablon, Alex", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be \nhere until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30. \nBest, \nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home? \n-do you work on a laptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at \nhand? Is the dining room windowless? \n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home? \n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort? \n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred \nbillion dollars? When was this meal? \n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival \ngovernments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of \ntheir fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself? \n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly \ndied? \n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them? \n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives? \n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004? \n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ? \n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant? \n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through \ntheir own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When \nMichael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you \narranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do \nyou maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy \nmakers and businessmen with whom you often meet? \n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York? \n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school? \n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the \nwomen who work for you accompany you? \n-Did you invite Michael to sit in on a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have \ndeveloped promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each? \n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? \nWas anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund? \n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has a home across the street \nfrom you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did \nthey bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm? \n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a 9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss \nhis defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS \nas a proxy against the Kurds? \n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting? \n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US \nforeign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet? \n-The following morning, did Ehud Barack come over for breakfast? Did he have an omelet? Did he defend both Putin and \nObama? \n-Was this followed by a senior White House official, whose name you don't want mentioned? \n-Did you then meet with Elisa New to discuss supporting a poetry series and other sources of funding? Did you forcefully \ncritique her proposed budget? \n-After meeting with New, did you meet with the following: Hardeep Purie, Kairat Kelimbetov, Nathan Myhrvold, Martin \nNowak, Richard Axel, Ron Baron, Josh Harris? Have you funded Nowak's program at Harvard with $30 million? \n-did Michael join a lunch at your home with Bill Richardson? \n-do you believe powerful people seek your advice because you're not affiliated with any institution, so you have no ulterior \nmotives when giving them advice? \n-is your Paris home a 10,000 sq ft apartment on Avenue Foch? Does it have a stuffed baby elephant in its living room? Is it \nmeant as a reminder that elephants have 23 copies of tumor suppressor genes? \n-Is the only book on your bedside table Lolita? Are you a fan of Nabokov? \n-Did you tell Michael that he should make a particular $100k investment in early September? What was it? \n-Were you born on 1953 in Coney Island? Was your father a Parks dept employee? Was your mother a housewife? \n-were you the captain of the math team at Lafayette High School? \n-did you study at Cooper Union for two years before beginning classes at NYU's Courant classes? After this, did you teach math \nat Dalton? Was this your first exposure to wealthy people? Did this teach you the rich had just as many problems as the \nworking class, only theirs were caused by too much money rather than too little? \n-Did Punch Sulzberger try to convince you to join the NYT from Dalton? Did you once drive with Sulzberger to his country \nestate in a wood paneled station wagon, while he talked on a phone to his chaffeur? \n-did you meet Ace Greenberg through his children at Dalton? \n-Did he say that given your reputation for intelligence and Jewish heritage, you should be working at Bear Stearns? Was this in \nthe late 70s? \n-Did you soon move to a penthouse at 66th St. and 2nd Avenue? \n-During this time did you regularly attend Studio 54? \n-Have you ever drank or taken drugs? \n-Do you believe that in the 50's, finance was governed by personal relationships, but in the 70's, with the rise of derivatives \ntrading, math began to dominate the field? \n-Did you never want to get married to maintain your freedom? \n-Did you become close to Jimmy Cayne? \n-Did you leave Bear Stearns in 1982? Why? Did you take clients including Marvin Davis and Herb Siegel? \n-Were you then dating Morgan Fairchild? \n-During the 80s, did you frequently go to England where you befriended Robin Reach and attended country shooting parties \nand black tie dinners? \n-Were you mainly interested in meeting smart people rather than amassing a personal fortune? \n-do you think that billionaire-level worth creates worries that millionaires don't face? Does traditional wealth management \nnot work for billionaires? \n-Did you help governments that came after corrupt dictators reclaim stolen assets? Which governments? \n-Did you begin advising and representing wealthy people and families regarding philanthropy during this period? \n-Did you advise Steven Hoffenberg? \n-Did you attend the 1994 Serpentine Gallery gala? Did you socialize with Princess Diana at that event? \n-Did you meet Bill Clinton after he left the White House? Did this change the arc of your life? \n-did you buy your Manhattan home from Les Wexner? \n-Did you meet with Larry Page and Sergey Brin during your 2002 trip to the TED conference? Did they describe a plan to market \nGoogle bras with the o's as cups? Did they believe Google was a good company name because men would be drawn to the oo? \n-Soon after this, did you have an assistant schedule a meeting with Michael for advice about the media as both Vanity Fair and \nNew York Magazine were profiling you? Did you also ask Graydon Carter for advice, expressing doubts about increased public \nprofile, to which Carter said you should have moved to a Queens 2 bedroom if you wanted to avoid publicity? \n-Have you had a daily massage for several years? When you got your daily massage in Palm Beach, did the masseuses often \ncome from parlors your termed \"Jack Shacks\" ? Did they sometimes have \"happy endings\" ? Would there be many different \nmasseuses, recommended by word of mouth? \n-After Palm Beach police started investigating you, did you ask Alan Dershowitz to come to Florida to provide you with legal \nhelp?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": ""}]


