# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt_18948
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 11:00:51 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "Richard Kahn\nHBRK Associates Inc.\n575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor\nNew York, NY 10022\ntel\nfax\ncel"}, {"sender": "\"Ruberto Israel & Weiner\" <info@riw.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 3, 2018 at 4:02:49 PM EST", "subject": "Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "January 2018"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt_18953
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:24 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "we dont teach children to see. they have a visual grammar built in. why wouldnt we expect some mutation of that system to allow auditory grammar."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We don't teach children language either, contrary to many beliefs. The visual grammar just grows, and as is known, can develop in various ways depending on early experience. Same with the language grammar, though the period in which experience has a shaping effect is much longer.\n\nHowever, there are fundamental differences between vision and language. Can send you a recent paper about it if you like. Vision is an input system. Language isn't. It's an internal capacity, a system of knowledge, which is used to process input and also to produce thoughts (sometimes externalized). Seems also to be modality independent. And their properties look wholly different, so it's hard to see how one could piggy-back on the other.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "The hardware of vision is an input system, It's the software that I'm referring to ."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I presume that the software just guides the hardware. Don't see how that changes the considerations."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Vision rules needed to craft coherent image . Edges? \" Faggehtabowtit.\" Two edges crafted by software"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "This is the program David Marr initiated, developed by Shimon Ullman and others. Makes sense, and there are some interesting results. David was a friend, and we often discussed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is.\n\nThat fundamental difference, along with the fact that the principles involved seem quite different, has always been a stumbling block to seeking any link."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "thought you might be interested in a new version of the percentage agreement between stalin and churchill. Saudi and Iran doing the same, dividing spheres of influence. . it seems few people paying attention to palestinians . maybe next generation. - israel going further right it appears. I find that media induced fear is driving world markets. . very odd. gas prices down nobody shopping, . hotel prices down less travel, commodity prices way down, little building. luxury market decimated. no russians or chinese players. . still virtually zero interest rates. . borrowing not up, fear and paralysis. , ( I add these topics as to these at least, i can speak with a modicum of knowledge )"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:37:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more from you about them, when we have a chance. Is it worldwide, or mostly here?\n\nMy impression is that the fear is mostly in the US. There's nothing in (much more vulnerable) Europe comparable to the Visa Waiver program (insanely targeting Iran, which has not been involved in terrorism, while exempting Saudi Arabia, the source of almost all jihadi terrorism). Or Trump-style ban them all. Or Cruz-style carpet-bomb them. For a long time, probably back to colonial days, this has been a very frightened country, maybe the safest in the world but also the most frightened. Impressions.\n\nSometimes it's quite weird. By accident, I took the first flight PanAm 103 after the Lockerbie bombing, together with an old friend, a veteran Middle East correspondent. It must have been the safest flight in human history. The plane was empty. We were bumped up to first class because there was no one there."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032558.txt_18955
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032558.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "catch up today?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Buying a new kayak...hard negotiations going on...will call when I am done...Rudy next ag..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm term=.37edla334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm term=.37edla334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 3:08:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know if your boy barrack is close witha lebanese/nigerian biz guy named chagoury?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt_18965
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt
subject: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Leah Reis-Dennis"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 4:36:41 AM", "subject": "Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear \nJeffrey \n(and please see note at bottom), \nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016 \nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and \nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether \nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you've more recently joined our \ncircle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this year's \nsuccesses possible. \nLast fall, I knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced \ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production, \nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit \ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard's Division of Continuing Education), and getting \nthe word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America for \nTeachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the highest-\nquality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried \nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of \nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing \nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble and \nstable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate \ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and \ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, I have much progress to report. \nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3 \nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company I'd founded in 2014, received \nIRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions, Verse \nVideo Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational media for \nother institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School, YIVO Institute \nfor Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and Project Zero. While \nphilanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the impact of \nphilanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship partnerships with \nWGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and projects. These include \na video series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a \ncollaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion \nof our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diversely \ntalented board, Verse Video Education is looking toward sustainability. We are now discussing \ndistribution of new content with a variety of stakeholders, including media providers in China. \nNew Harvard Partner: Bok Center for Teaching and Learning \nMeanwhile, Poetry in America has deepened its partnership and formulated a plan for growth going \nforward at Harvard. This fall, Harvard's Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Mike Smith, \nendorsed the integration and expansion of my public-facing humanities work within the Derek Bok \nCenter for Teaching and Learning. As a Bok Fellow this year, and alongside Bok director Rob Lue in \nthe years to come, I will be working to substantially expand Bok's capacity and resources to train \nhumanists in 21st-century methods of public engagement-- developing courses, digital fellowship \nopportunities and also securing distribution outlets and partners for content produced in Bok by \nHarvard humanists. By next year at this time, I will be turning some of my attention beyond poetry (my \nfavorite, but hardly the only humanistic mode of communication!) to create a wider base of \nhumanities materials for use in American schools and other institutions. We will begin integrating and \nanchoring Poetry in America content (on art, sport and play; on the environment; and on health and \nwell being) with content created by others. As I continue to experiment with use of digital media \nwithin my residential courses for undergraduates and graduates, I shall also be working with other \nfaculty and graduate students. My work at Bok will also facilitate collaborations between humanists \nworking across the whole university. Projects for 2017 include work with HarvardX on drama and \nShakespeare, with Harvard's Center for the Environment, with the Arts and Humanities Initiative at \nHarvard Medical School, and with several programs within Harvard's Graduate School of Education. \nLaunching in 2017: Our First Course Designed Specifically for Teachers \nVerse Video Education has allocated much of its staff time this year to bringing its first course \ndesigned specifically to support the American secondary classroom to completion. Poetry in America \nfor Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop draws on assets created at HarvardX, along with \nfootage captured with our TV partners and independently by Verse Video Education. The resulting \ncourse, designed for English, Social Studies, and Arts teachers, as well as for librarians, \nadministrators and others, provides deep content instruction as well as pedagogical training. \nCommon Core aligned, this course, the first of its kind, is now open for enrollment, and will launch \nJanuary 23rd. We are currently discussing group enrollments with major educational systems and \nreformers across the nation, and we are also raising scholarship funds for strapped enrollees. Over \ntime, we hope to play a leading role in improving literacy and in strengthening the humanities across \nthe American educational landscape. \nAiring Nationwide in 2018: Poetry in America, The Television Series \nIn May 2016, Verse Video Education was asked by WGBH and American Public Television to expand \nits television series in development from 8 to 13 episodes, listed below. \nThe following episodes are entering post-production: \nOn Edward Hirsch's \"Fast Break\": Shaquille O'Neal, Pau Gasol, Shane Battier, Edward Hirsch, \nand an on-court pick-up basketball chorus filmed at Success Academy Charter School; On W.H. \nAuden's \"Musee Des Beaux Arts\": Ambassador Samantha Power, David Brooks, Peter Sacks; On \nRobert Hayden's \"Those Winter Sundays\": Vice President Joe Biden, Elizabeth Alexander, Angela \nDuckworth, Kevin Young, and a chorus of fathers and sons; On Carl Sandburg's \"Skyscraper\": \nFrank Gehry, Robert Polito, and a chorus of Young Student Poets; On Nas's \"New York State of \nMind\": Nas, Russell Simmons, Salamishah Tillet, Steve Stoute, and a chorus of hip hop heads; On \nGalway Kinnell's \"The Grey Heron\": E.O. Wilson, Robert Hass, Laura McPhee; On Gwendolyn \nBrooks's \"To Prisoners\": Anna Deveare Smith, Reginald Dwayne Betts, Li-Young Lee and a \nchorus of exonerees from the Innocence Project; On William Carlos Williams's \"This Is Just To \nSay\": Woody Allen, Jane Hirshfield, Rafael Campo and a chorus of couples young and old; On \nLangston Hughes's \"Harlem\": President Bill Clinton, Herbie Hancock, Sonia Sanchez and a chorus \nof children from Promise Academy; On Allen Ginsberg's Hymmnn from \"Kaddish\" and \"Hum \nBom\": Bono, Juan Felipe Herrera and a chorus of clergy. \nThe production of the following episodes will wrap early 2017: \nOn Emily Dickinson's \"I cannot dance opon my Toes\": Cynthia Nixon, Yo Yo Ma, Marie Howe \nand Bill T. Jones; On Marianne Moore's \"The Fish\": Jorie Graham, Edward Norton, Conservation \nInternational scientists, and the passengers and crew of oceanographic vessel The Alucia; On \nElizabeth Bishop's \"One Art\" or Edna St. Vincent Millay's \"Four Sonnets.\" \nJeffrey, \nJust a quick note to thank you again for all the help you've given me. The generous contribution you \nmade last year to Verse Video Education is now in use (we've hired our new editor!). Once he helps \nus to plow through the work of this year, we'll begin to look forward to crafting educational content on \nthe literature of art, sport and play (these materials now including footage from recent shoots with \nShaquille O'Neal, Yo Yo Ma, Cynthia Nixon, Bono and others). 100K makes so much possible. \nBut, of course, you've also been a key preceptor as I've learned how --squirming all the way--the \nsausage really gets made in public television. I can't say I've been entirely successful in taming costs \nthere, but I've been far better armed and more mindful of what they should be after the stern tutorial \nyou administered. \nWhenever Templeton might be ready to evaluate another application, I'm ready for another proposal \nfor them. I wonder if you might arrange a meeting for me with the famous Bamaby? I can't yet afford a \ngrant writer, and so the time one of these suckers takes makes me think doing more advance \nreconnaissance is crucial. Would he meet with me? Kosher? I'd also love to meet with the Blacks as I \nget closer to making content on theatre. I hope that Debra is well. \nAnd heard there's another little Jeff in the caribbean... \nBest,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030691.txt_18968
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030691.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.1MMIIMOMMI>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:16:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033120.txt_18969
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033120.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/20/2018 10:01:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was offline for yom kippur . can you put me in direct contact.? happy holiday"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\nOnce again you are right.\nSee you soon,\nWith my friendship,\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack", "tom", "tom jacques"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt_18981
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt
subject:
  EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA

messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:24:59 PM", "subject": "EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA", "body": "We remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\n\nGlobal Equities\nSpecialist Sales - European Financials\n\nMAR disclosure\n\nEU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE\nSpec Sales Comment:\nBig Equity outflows but we see this is a pause not a reversal\nBofAML latest flow show data this morning shows the largest equity outflows in 40 weeks and first outflows YTD (click here). Our BofAML Bull & Bear Indicator is now at 7.1, the highest level since Jul'14 and not far from \"sell\" signal. So is this just a pause for breath in the reflation trade? BofAML strategists think so. In our updated thoughts this morning we think reflation is real so stay long equities, short rates, selectively long USD (click here).\n\nChart 12: BofAML B&B Indicator (scale from 0 to 10)\n13mdt\nFeb.16 lows\nToday\n10\nExtreme Extreme\nBearish Bullish\nSource BotA Merniloynch Global Investment Strategy\n\nWhy do we remain bullish the reflation trade?\nThe main reasons for equity investor concern in recent weeks = the gap between hard and soft data, plus the delay in the Trump fiscal package\n\nChart 1: The gap between hard and soft data is a concern to investors Chart 2: Mediocre US Q1 data partly down to seasonal adjustments\nResidual seasonality in GDP growth from 1985 to 2015\n25\n2 08\n15 06\n1\n04\n05 0 02\n-0 5 0\n-1\n-1 5 -0 2\n-2 -0 4\n-2 5 01 00 01/02 01104 01/06 0108 01/10 01/12 01/14 01/16 -0 6\n-0 8\n—Surveys & Business Cycte Indicators —Hard Data\n-1\nScs,oce SoM Mend Lynch Glcbal Research Bloortf-ri\n01\nSource Cleveland Federal Reserve\n• GDP\n• Pnvate Investment\n• Government consumptron & investment\n02\n03\n04\n\nWe continue to believe in the reflation theme because:\n1. Strength in the global economy is genuine - European PMIs are at 6 year highs, Chinese and Japanese PMIs continue to improve too. In fact —90% of PMIs globally are above 50 and 60% have increased in the last 3 months.\n2. Earnings revisions and Global Wave point to continued upturn - earnings revisions now above 1.0 for the first time since 2011.\n3. We expect Trump to deliver on tax, even if it is smaller than hoped for - should such a package be put together it would likely support the Trump trade once again after the failure to reform Obamacare\n4. Bond markets are being too sanguine about the likely pace of Fed tightening - the Fed funds curve is once again well below the dot plot. We continue to see upside in yields if and when the market becomes more convinced that the soft data is right.\n\nChart 7: Bond yields have pulled back from FOMC highs\n2.7 -\n2.5\n2.3\n2.1\n1.9\n1.7\n1.5\n1.3\nfAINA\nCO CO CO CD GO tO CD CO CO CO CO CO N.- N.-\n—UST 10y yield\nC 9.4. 5, 1 .7 3-3 <-81A\nSource Btoombero\n\nChart 8: As the market refuses to price the dot plot\n250-\n200 -\n150\n100 -\n50\n1\n0\n—Current market pncmg\nMedian dot. Mar-17 SEP\n—BofAML forecast\n# of meetings into tightening cycle\n4 8 12 16 20 24\nSource SofA !item' Lynch 7,PRearcti Bloomberg\n\nEuropean Banks holding up better than US Peers on pull back\nIn Banks, the reoccurring feedback from investors has been that clients have rotated out of US banks and into European banks. This conflicts with our latest Fund Manager Survey which suggested allocation to European Banks fell the most of any sector MoM in the first two weeks of March, however, its true European Banks have quickly reversed the performance gap to US peers. The spread between the SX7E and S5BANKX Index is back to pre-US election levels.\n\nWhat the EU banks bulls are saying:\nEUR rates are going higher it's just a matter of timing, positive EPS revisions continue, EU is starting to see pockets of volume growth and asset yield recovery, credit spreads have been tightening YTD and\n\nattractive valuations of EU banks vs. US peers (EU banks on 12.0x 2017E PIE vs. US Banks on -14x and some EU banks still on a large discount vs 10-year historical median P/B valuations).\n\nWhat the EU banks bears are saying:\nEU macro declining, US lead re-flation trade cooling (tax, deregulation, healthcare headwinds) and toppy multiples/high ownership of EU banks going into Q1 results. They believe the pressure will be off Draghi to act on the deposit rate if the macro starts to reverse which may cause people to push back the assumed timing of European rate hikes and tapering. The French election is also a big risk factor which is clearly holding back some global investors from buying into Europe.\n\nRates Update\nConsensus has started to factor in the higher rate outlook in Europe. The bears are pointing out that these probabilities have fallen a lot this week while the bulls argue it's just a matter of timing.\nI monitor market expectations for ECB normalisation in rates using the World Interest Rate Probability (WIRP) function on Bloomberg. It's been very volatile recently. I currently see the market is pricing a 16.6% probability of a EUR rate hike before the end of 2017 (row 6, column 2 below). a 32.7% probability in the next 12 months (row 9, column 2) and a 67.6% probability in the next 18 months.\nEi Ir.-.\n• Instrument\n3 Future Implied Probability\nCurrent Implied Probabilities\n1) Overview\nOIS: Eurozone OIS - Deposit F(\nDates o Meeting Calculation\nMeeting Prob Of Hike Prob of Cut\n04/27/2017 0.0% 2A'\n06/08/2017 0.0% 3.3%\n07/20/2017 2.1% 3.2%\n09/07/2017 7.2% 3.1%\n10/26/2017 8.8% 3.0%\n12/14/2017 16.6% 2.8%\n01/25/2018 21.6% 2.6%\n03/08/2018 29.4% 2.3%\n04/26/2018 32.7% 2.2%\n06/14/2018 41.4% 1.9%\n• Historical Analysis for Meeting\n:17/2017\n) Add\nikal ted\n-0.6\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n• Current Rate -0.40\n,•2 rates\nIn Based on rate -0.40\n.)-1 '07/2017\n-0.5\n2.4%\n3.3%\n3 2%\n3.1%\n3.0%\n2.7%\n2.6%\n2.3%\n2.2%\n-0.4\n97.6%\n96.7%\n94,6%\n89.7%\n88.2%\n80.6%\n75.8%\n68.2%\n65.1%\n•4) Add/Remove Series\n-0.3 -0.2 BPS•\n0.0% 0.0% -0.2\n0.0% 0.0% -0.3\n2.1% 0,0% -0.1\n7.1% 0.1% 0.4\n8.6% 0.2% 0.6\n15.6% 1.0% 1.5\n19.6% 1.9% 2.1\n25.4% 3.7% 3.1\n27.5% 4.8% 36\n32.5% 7.8% 5.0.\n\nAs a reminder our research team estimate that euro area banks could see as much as €26bn in earnings uplift from a return of ECB rates to zero. This would represent a 25% uplift to profits - a big prize when it happens (click here for report).\n\nWhat to buy in banks if you share our view on sustained reflation?\nWe remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\nTop picks:\nBuy Soc Gen, PO C55\n• Still fourth worst performer in the SX7E YTD due to French election overhang.\n• Yet reported a strong set of Q4 results, beating on P&L, capital and dividend which comforts our view that the stock is set for re-rating.\n• Continues to tick a number of boxes offering a dividend yield of 5.1% in 2017E, an attractive valuation of 0.79x 2017e TNAV, solid capital position and has strong EPS momentum.\n• Our EPS (2017 and 2018) is 10% above consensus with further upside from CIB, Russia recovery and Corporate Center\n• Stronger capital position allows for growth (organic and bolt-on M&A)\nBuy Intesa, PO C2.80\n• On NPEs, capital, profitability, operating trends, and cash payouts, Intesa stands above other Italian banks in our view.\n• ISP will pay a dividend (confirmed) equivalent to an 8.0% yield vs. a 4.0% European banks average and on our estimates\n• Italian banks are trading at a PNAV discount to ISP but their profitability is half that of ISP's and their capital is lower\n• ISP retains the lowest (gross/net) Italian NPE ratio and in 4Q16 NPE were down yoy by 8% gross/10% net.\n• Shares have suffered from the uncertainty related to a possible tie-up with insurer Generali - still the seventh worst performing bank in the SX7E YTD\nAlso remain very bullish on market exposed Nordic banks\nThis morning we reiterate our preference for Nordic banks (click here for report) with more market exposed revenues and reiterate our Buy ratings on Danske Bank, Nordea, DNB and SEB ahead of Q1 results. We expect to see good fee /trading income in Q1 on the back of strong AUM and continued high activity levels.\nThe relative P/E premium of Nordic banks vs. the sector is now 7% vs. a long term average of 11%. We also note that Nordic banks are expected to continue to deliver close to 4% better ROTE (2017-19E) and have a lower beta.\n\nChart 1: Danske Bank remains best capital return story (Capital buffers as % of market cap)\n300\n200\n100\n00\n208\n69\n13.8\n11.0\nDANSKE SHBA\n10.8 10.8 10.4 10.3\n5.8 6.4 6.1 6.0\n4.9 ZIEN\nSEBA NDA DNB SWEDA\nBuffer 17E Divi + Buyback (not yet executed) Buffer + Dii + Buyback (not executed)\nSource. SofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates\n\nPlease let me know if you would like to discuss in more detail or meet any of our analysts on the above reports."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt_18985
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt
subject: What do u make of latest trump follies?
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 10:42:58 PM", "subject": "What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Importance: — High\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt_18995
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt
subject: trump making a nice move ..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/14/2016 2:33:10 PM", "subject": "trump making a nice move ..", "body": "Election Polls | President Polls | State Polls | Senate Polls | House Polls | Governor Polls | Approval Polls\nWednesday, September 14\n\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton LA Times/USC Tracking Clinton 42, Trump 47 Trump +5\nClinton 39, Trump 39,\n\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs.\n\nJohnson vs. Stein dioica Johnson 8, Stein 2 Tie\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 40, Trump 39 Clinton +1\nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson Trump 44, Clinton 39,\n\nvs. Stein Blosmbete Johnson 10, Stein 3 Song +\nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton Bloomberg Clinton 43, Trump 48 Trump +5\nMaine: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson Colby Clinton 42, Trump 27, Clinton +3\nvs. Stein College/SurveyUSA Johnson 9, Stein 5\n\nMaine CD2: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Colby Trump 47, Clinton a7, Trump +10\nJohnson vs. Stein College/SurveyUSA Johnson 8, Stein 5\n\n== Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson KSN News/SurveyUSA ae a ioe ce Trump +12\n\nSouth Carolina: Trump vs. Clinton vs.\nJohnson vs. Stein\n\nTrump 53, Clinton 38,\nJohnson 3, Stein 1\n\nTrafalgar Group (R) Trump +15\n\nKansas Senate - Moran vs. Wiesner KSN News/SurveyUSA* Moran 50, Wiesner 34 Moran +16\n\n. Te _ . Colby _ . .\nMaine 2NG Listrict - FOuUquin VS. Wain Folquin SY, Vain 45 +\nMaine 2nd District - Poliquin vs. Cain College/SurveyUSA Poliquin 50, Cain 45 Poliquin +5\nMaine 1st District - Holbrook vs. Colby . .\n\n: +\nes Collese/SurvevUSA Pingree 57, Holbrook 37 ~— Pingree +20\n\n. i .\nPresident Obama Job Approval Reuters/Ipsos a a Tie\n2016 Generic Congressional Vote Reuters/Ipsos as = Democrats +2\nRepublicans 38\n\noo. Right Direction 22, Wrong Wrong Track\nwirecuon Of Vountry ANCULETS/ IPSOS\nDirection of Countr Reuters/Ipsos Track 65 443"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt_18996
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt
subject: Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2018 6:23:09 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act", "body": "The 2017 Tax Reform Act - Key\nProvisions Impacting Fund Managers\nand Their Funds\n\nFor further information about this Alert,\nplease contact:\n\nAlex Gelinas\nPartner\n\n212.573.8159\nagelinas @sglawyers.com\n\nSteven Etkind\nPartner\n\n212.573.8412\nsetkind@sglawyers.com\n\nPlease feel free to discuss any aspect of\nthis Alert with your regular Sadis &\nGoldberg contact or with any of the"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt_19009
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HE. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island withhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt_19014
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt
subject: good call on pence
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 5:13:01 PM", "subject": "good call on pence", "body": "http://www. nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/mike-pence-donald-trump-vice-president. html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt_19017
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt
subject: Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number , or have him cll"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend.\n\nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend.\n\nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail.\n\nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are “not published”. As of today, there are\n\neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market.\n\nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever).\n\nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it’s way to\n\na museum.\nHope all is well.\nSincerely,\n\nEric Roth\n\nPresident\n\ninternational jet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt_19028
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri Oct 18 2013 at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 1:36:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023230.txt_19029
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023230.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\n\nIn the spirit in which it is sent. our friendship is intact and solid , though ,it has taken a hit.\n\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a\ngreat deal of my detailed time. I do not know how, and even, if ,to move forward - . After months of\nhearing that you would have no problem paying a large fee if you could only ascertain value. The last\ntransaction. a transaction which you saved over 600 million in tax. declared bullet proof by your attnys,\nand even if you want to disoccount for its future realization, creating a savings of over 300 million real\ndollars. For some reason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and at the\nvery last minute , after the deal was complete decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you and\nyour family. . ( assuming phaidon -richard happens. there is a 24m savings not including artspace and\ndebt write down benefits- certain to come later .. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . WILL NOT !!\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple\ntimes that i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I\ndon't have many friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship.\nReminder, For five years you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of\nyour massive accounting , legal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain\nterms that I firmly believed she was incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of\nmy mouth\". With regard Brad Wechsler , there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly\nmaintained since day one that he was highly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help\n\nfirst to point out that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price\nfor all the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of\nrange. in fact, alternative methods of payment . ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (ie\nincluding keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more\nneeded on phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best\nof light , though it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever\nproposed a unique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most\nbasic review of your largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to\nthe plan and stretch reality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large\namount unless they were wearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated\nwith the deal was known . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times ,\n\na detailed execution plan was provided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for\nthe group to follow You told me that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only\n20m would be paid , (and even that was more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions .\nLeon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did brad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that\nyou I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with\nyour consent of course. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime,\nhowever , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and\noverseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction had even begun, had already\nbeen heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re only paying 20m has frankly , left\nme felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or Rothschild transaction."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt_19035
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt
subject: Re: bannon view of trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:58 AM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X9E9n6GHC8"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:11:44 PM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "Haven't watched this yet. But was with him for a few hours last night and got the full download: he think trump has lost his stuff, and as well, to boot, is an idiot. Putin, tho, he thinks is a genius."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt_19038
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt
subject: Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/28/2018 10:56:02 PM", "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": "http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/28/middle-eastern-monarchs-look-at-the-trumps-and-see-themselves/amp/\n\nMiddle Eastern Monarchs Look at the \nTrumps and See Themselves \nAmerica's Arab allies have always wanted to buy direct access \nto U.S. foreign policy, and they finally found a seller. \nMay 28, 2018 \nIvanka Trump andJared Kushner at the presentation of the Order of Abdulaziz al-Saud \nmedal at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh on May 20, 2017.(MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty \nImages) \nAlmost 20 years ago when I was a graduate student living in Cairo, I published an article in \na Washington-based journal called Middle East Insight. The magazine had a solid \nreputation, with a knack for scoring interviews with important people. (In the same edition \nas my piece, titled \"Egypt's Next Generation,\" there was an interview with Gamal Mubarak, \nson of long-term Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who had already begun his rise___ \nthough not yet his eventual fall____as heir apparent.) A few years later, Middle East Insight \ndisappeared. When I heard the news, I figured the magazine was too niche for an expanding \nmedia environment, shrugged my shoulders, and went on with life. \nI hadn't thought about Middle East Insight until its onetime publisher, George Nader, \nrecently exploded into the news as an international man of mystery at the center of an \napparent attempt to covertly influence the outcome of the last American presidential \nelection. It seems that in the span of not quite two decades, the guy who ran a small, likely \nnot profitable, but influential policy magazine become a conduit between Crown Prince \nMohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of the Abu Dhabi, Saudi Crown Prince \nMohammed bin Salman, and Donald Trump's closest inner circle, both after, and \ncrucially for special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing criminal investigation___before \nTrump's election as U.S. president. \nNader's story is yet another example of the sleaze, greed, and influence-peddling that has \ncome to seem ordinary in Trump-era Washington. But it also offers a view into a more \nextraordinary and unprecedented problem: a decision by some of America's closest allies in \nthe Middle East to leverage their financial resources in common cause with a bunch \nof ganef s to influence U.S. foreign policy. It is a problem that can be traced back, in ways \nthat haven't generally been understood, to Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor Jared \nKushner and his mobile phone. \nFrom the perspective of the leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Israel (there \nis an Israeli angle to the George Nader story, but it isn't yet entirely clear), and Egypt, there \nwas an entirely rational reason to support Trump's presidential bid and try to influence his \napproach to the Middle East: They did not like former President Barack Obama's Middle \nEast policy. And while they likely understood that presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was \nmore hawkish that the president she served as secretary of state, the Saudis, Emiratis, and \nIsraelis were concerned that she would be tethered to the Iran nuclear deal and thus Obama's \nIran policy. \nThey also believed that Clinton would be soft on Islamists. It is an article of faith in Egypt \nthat she enabled the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and Mohamed Morsi in 2011 and 2012. \nFor countries in the Persian Gulf, Egypt provides strategic depth, and \"losing\" it to the \nMuslim Brotherhood was a major geopolitical blow. The Israelis, for obvious reasons, were \ndeeply concerned about the accumulation of Islamist political power next door and blamed \nthe Obama administration for abandoning Hosni Mubarak, thereby placing Israel's security \nin jeopardy. \nWith Trump, Washington's allies got a candidate and president who referred to the Iran \nnuclear agreement as the \"worst deal ever,\" surrounded himself with people who either \nmake no distinction between al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood or are simply outright \nIslamophobes, and has forthrightly declared that the United States supports its friends in the \nfight against terrorism. Full stop. No caveats, buts, or howevers concerning human rights \nand the need for political reform. To them, this seemed a lot better than the appreciation of \nnuance and complexity that was a hallmark of the Obama administration. \nOf course, even if an American president shares a given ally's view of the world, diplomacy \ndoes not stop. The job of ambassadors, foreign ministers, and other representatives of \nforeign governments is to keep the United States on their side. Traditionally, this is done \nthrough formal discussions with U.S. officials at the State Department, National Security \nCouncil, and Department of Defense; meetings with members of Congress; writing op-eds in \ninfluential media outlets; and informal channels of influence, notably the Washington social \ncircuit of dinners, embassy garden parties, national day events and the like. No doubt there \nwas a lot of this going on through the first year and half of the Trump administration. But as \nwe now know, there was an entirely parallel effort to influence American foreign policy, and \nGeorge Nader was at the center of it. \nAccording to the New York Times, Nader and Elliott Broidy pitched a scheme to the \ngovernments of the UAE and Saudi Arabia in which Broidy would use his extensive \ncontacts in Washington, especially in the White House, to shape U.S. policy toward Qatar, \nwhich the Saudis and Emiratis accuse of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, funding \nextremism, and cozying up to Iran. Apparently, the Emiratis agreed to the arrangement. \nClearly, putting the screws to Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani is a high priority for \nthe crown princes of Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, who undoubtedly would not apologize \nfor using every method and resource at their disposal to advance their countries' interests. \nWhat is the Trump administration's excuse, though? \nThe kind of influence-peddling in which Nader and Broidy were involved can be traced back \nto Jared Kushner. On Nov. 8, 2016, if not before, he was handing out his cellphone number \nto all kinds of people in Washington with little regard for the potential consequences and \napparently little idea about who was genuinely powerful and who were just posers. No doubt \nthat important people in certain countries had the mobile numbers of senior members of the \nObama administration, plus their Gmail addresses, but there was something qualitatively \ndifferent about the way Kushner was operating. He was essentially opening the door to a \nTrumpian culture in which there is no process, there is no vetting, everyone and anyone \ncould be an asset, loyalty is the greatest quality second only to money, and there are always \nways to get something done no matter what. \nTrump's world does not operate the same way as Washington's major Middle Eastern allies, \nbut there are some parallels that make stories like the George Nader affair possible. Trump's \ntendency to eschew the formal processes and procedures of government dovetails with the \nway in informal power, uncodified norms, and past practices shape governance and policy in \nplaces as diverse as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Israel. These kinds of informal \ninstitutions exist in the United States as well; a lot of things have gotten done in Washington \nover the years because of the Harvard \"old boys' network or because that's the way it has \nalways been done in the cloakroom. But informal networking has generally not guided the \nrealm of foreign policy, which has always involved an exhaustive (and exhausting) \ninteragency process. Kushner's willingness to hand out his digits signaled that Team Trump \nwas open to doing things significantly differently from previous administrations, and U.S. \nallies along with people like Nader and Broidy took him up on it. The result was a $650 \nmillion contract for Broidy's security firm after he bent the ear of the president and others \nabout the perfidy of the Qatari leadership. \nFrom the vantage point of Middle Eastern capitals, in Trump's Washington, the secretary of \nstate and the national security advisor are superfluous. You could go through Kushner or \nsupplement by engaging in some \"riyalpolitik.\" The influence business has been around \nWashington for a long time. The amount of money that foreign governments expend on D.C. \nlobbying is staggering, but the Nader-Broidy scheme was an attempt to sell American \nforeign policy___which, as Mueller will soon remind everyone lest anyone in Trump's orbit \nforget, is different from selling real estate. \nLike this article? Read an unlimited number of articles, plus access to our entire 47-year \nprinted archive, the FP App, and the Digital Magazine when you subscribe to FP  \nPremium for just 99 cents!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt_19051
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt
subject: Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn <i@hbrk.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html\n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken\n\nTae Kim\n\nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, Bloomberg News reported Friday.\n\nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for securities fraud.\n\nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy Giuliani support the pardon for Milken.\n\nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered the market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 years in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years.\n\nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond to requests for comment.\n\nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:26:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken", "body": "Did we get bank appraisal ayh"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022444.txt_19052
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022444.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2016 2:04:49 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Remind ur friend that I designed the DJT business comeback and now he may be the President"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt_19060
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt
subject: Donald Trump | Deutsche Bank | House Intelligence Committee
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Mitchel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 11:08:57 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump | Deutsche Bank | House Intelligence Committee", "body": "https://therealdeal.com/2019/01/09/congress-to-investigate-trumps-florida-property-sale-deutsche-bank-loans/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt_19062
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:30:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\n\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next time\nyou're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar themes to\nLolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you were\n\nso kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt_19064
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy shit im on | for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....now are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , 1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 6:57:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt_19067
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 9:00:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt_19068
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt_19069
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 11:11:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a \nmistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer. . you took a postion on the direction of the \nmarket. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. \n? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you \nauthority. . you set a target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump \nvisit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, \nno discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is \nok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for \nmany years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re broadcom. the crack happend in \nthe morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage \nmoney. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would. \n. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be \nless annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to \nraise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago. . we should \nwork on a solution. not sure yet what shape it takes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt_19073
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker, MD Po"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 8:07:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "told you http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/15/trum\n-ex pands-ban-on-abortion-funding-overseas.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt_19076
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof [~ 0]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\n\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nDz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. _centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof [i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xked.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:32:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes , now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt_19077
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am | seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reif", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:33:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022322.txt_19079
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022322.txt
subject: Fw: Weekend Snippets [C]
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Morris", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/21/2013 12:44:26 AM", "subject": "Fw: Weekend Snippets [C]", "body": "Vinit is working with me on some large clients now, good resource, I will introduce you to him and few other sr. folks before year end either in NYC or in europe, just some directional thoughts/observations not necessarily for you,"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["Vinit Sahni"], "timestamp": "10/20/2013 07:05 PM GDT", "subject": "Weekend Snippets (internal only) [I]", "body": "Here we are -> record highs for the S&P 500, the S&P 400 Midcaps, and small cap Russell 2000. Should we be asking ourselves if this is the Terminal Phase or will this continue ? In these snippets here is a quick mark to market on where we are and some of the trades below. The theme of the trades below is very clear, carry outperformance and lower vol. Vol has broken down and we are on the leg down to 2009 levels (includes FX vol, rates vol, commodity vol etc) -> this has prompted additional risk taking and technicians for example are calling for 1775 levels in the S&P -> sharpe ratios of high carry trades looks very compelling here Mark to Market: With the US government reopened / debt ceiling raised, Obama stated -> there were \"no winners.\" It's been only about 3 weeks, but the fourth quarter has already shown itself worthy of the history books. If the spec community can hold gains through year-end (the vol markets are alluding to) -> the ranks of billionaires will surely inflate further. No winners, right ? This week saw the S&P500, the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index and the small cap Russell 2000 all trade to record highs. The week's 2.8% advance increased the small caps' year-to-date gain to 31.3%. Google added about 140 points and $38.5bn of market cap this week (to $338bn) to reach an all-time high (up 43% y-t-d). The more speculative \"beta\" stocks continue to outperform. The NASDAQ 100 (up 3.7% this week), Morgan Stanley High Tech Index (up 2.6%) and The Interactive Week Internet Index (3.4%) all traded to the highest levels since 2000. Treasury, MBS, and corporate debt prices were higher as well. It all adds up. The QE-enhanced 2013 version of \"how crazy do things get?\" is outshining even the 1999 speculative melee, yeah!!. The (post-LTCM bailout) year 1999 saw the small cap Russell 2000 Index jump from 422 to 505 (19.7%). This year, it has already run from 849 to 1,114 (up 31.3%). The S&P400 Midcap Index jumped from 392 to 445 in 1999 (13.5%). With more than two months to go, so far it's 1,020 to 1,290 for the midcaps (up 26.5%). Why stop just at the US. Germany's DAX equities index added 1.6% this week to a new all-time high (up 16.5% y-t-d). Italian stocks jumped 2.1% (up 18.4% y-t-d) and Spanish stocks surged 3.5% (up 22.5%), both to more than two-year highs. Australian stocks gained 1.7% (up 14.5% y-t-d). Despite major economic issues, India's stock market jumped 1.7% this week to within a couple percent of new highs. Stocks jumped 4.2% in Brazil and 4.3% in Argentina. Indonesian stocks rallied 4.5%. Around the globe, most equities markets pushed higher. Fueled by huge ETF flows, total equity mutual fund inflows this past week jumped to a whopping $12.7bn. You may want to see this -> On a weekly basis, global central bank International Reserve Assets (data from Bloomberg). This data provide a decent proxy for global financial flows, especially to the emerging markets (EM). From $6.63 TN back in April of 2009,  International Reserves surged this week to a record $11.415 TN. Reserves have inflated 330% in ten years. Lets focus on some trades here: 1) This environment is supportive for carry trades, which has been reflected in the outperformance of high yielders following the announcement of the US debt deal. Long AUD/USD: Longer term investors remain relatively short AUD, which suggests that AUDUSD strength has further to run. A move above parity is unlikely as the RBA should step in. Therefore buy 2m 0.9750 call against selling 2x 0.9900 calls. The AUDUSD risk reversal looks cheap (calls expensive relative to puts). This suggests selling high-strike calls, either outright for those that do not expect further AUD appreciation or to finance a low-strike call for a short-term carry position. Long KRW NDF : this trade will benefit should CNY appreciation or band widening expectations gain additional traction Long USD TRY: the market remains relatively short TRY, and with risk premium in USDTRY declining the most among major currencies, these short positions are likely to be at risk from carry traders. 2) HY vs IG compression trade in Europe: Six weeks of retail outflows from high-grade funds but retail inflows into high-yield funds shows that the compression trade in credit is firmly entrenched in Europe. There is a structural reach for yield and this trade still has some legs. I would however hedge out rate risk and stick with spread risk. I will point out that more than $200bn of \"cov-lite\" loans have been issued so far this year, more than double the $100bn sold in 2007. The record issuance means that about 56 per cent of new leveraged loans are now cov-lite !! 3) Long Europe small caps: This is a leveraged trade to a European recovery. European small + mid caps have a higher potential for upside. As European economies improve and small to mid cap valuations in the region continue to look attractive, a re-acceleration of sales and earnings at these companies should drive better performance in European small to mid caps versus the US. Investors looking for yield will find higher levels in Europe versus the US with European small to mid caps yielding near 3% versus approximately 1.4% in the US.  4) Long IT stocks: overall IT spend is expected to grow 0.9% in 2014 compared to —0.7% growth. Corporate spending sentiment now is on the uptick prompting this move. Also keep an eye on data center growth. Demand for data center services is due to, First, technological evolution -> driving up computing density (servers) and utilization rates (virtualization), therefore data center space must constantly evolve to meet power and cooling needs. Second, increased cost consciousness and core competency focus -> driving greater acceptance of data center outsourcing within Enterprise IT departments. 5) Long Italian Banks / Italian Govvies: another leveraged play on the European periphery recovery. Unicredit clearly stands out. UCG will definitely gain from the European banking union theme. There has been recent talk of this year / early 2014 as a point when impaired loan growth may finally subside and I expect a wide range of cost cutting action. Our strategists think \"Italy looks attractive in a twin deficits framework and should benefit from improving fiscal and credit impasse, political risk premium should decline\", therefore they recommend buying lOy Italy vs Germany at 230bps, targetting a spread at 200bps 6) Euro Inflation floors: In the euro inflation options market, 5y 0% inflation floor prices are close to their lows. This is not consistent with the 5y inflation swap rates which are by themselves close to lows -> meaning deflation is closer-to-the-money. Inflation volatility has collapsed, probably mostly for purely technical reasons as is all other vol !!. Deflation is not anyone's central case, but a \"underpriced tail risk\". This creates opportunity for those prepared to pay premium for this risk and therefore would recommend buying the charted 5y 0% zero coupon floors at or around the current level of 20c. 7) KOSPI Calls: The KOSPI2 has been trading within a tight range, realizing only 9.8% over the past 30 days, the lowest globally. Low realized vol has capped short-dated implied vol, driving lm ATM vol to 12.8%, near all time lows. The Index broke out from a tight range last week and investors should consider buying short-dated calls for upside exposure or replace outright longs with calls. The differential between positioning in EM equities and European equities has reached an extreme — worst on record and 2.4 stdev below its 10-year average. Even the NKY 3M ATM vol dropped to an 8-month low !!! 8) UK Banks: On the back of weak FICC earnings across the street, Barclays I feel has hit Rock Bottom. This reflects the sentiment around FICC geared investment banks generally, but also the horrible six months that management has seen. My personal view is that rates + credit will recover in 2014 as tapering will create a steeper curve and volatility. I also think Barclays leverage ratios will improve soon and Barclays will push through an aggressive cost cutting plan. Quick Macro Snippet:  What should we be focused on: The most important market drivers will now be the 1) US labor market data and 2) Eurozone inflation. An improvement in the former will determine the timing and pace of Fed tapering. A decline in the latter will determine whether the ECB will stay on hold, or loosen policies. The Sep NFP is on Tuesday stay focused. Gold some technicals - couldn't resist: The bears are still fighting the recent up move, here are some technicals to rebase... The volatility in gold over the past several days has been impressive. A close above 1330 (Oct-08 high) would be the first sign of basing and a turn higher, while bulls gain control only AFTER a close above 1375 (Sep-19 high). A close below 1270 exposes the Jun-13, bear trend lows of 1180"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021091.txt_19080
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021091.txt
subject: Re: Daily Beast
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peter Green"], "timestamp": "03 April 2011 12:36", "subject": "Re: Daily Beast", "body": "cant open anything that is not underlined in blue sorry Peter iam not good at computer stuff.When are you coming here soican call Catherine Crier please nothing to maryanne about thsi jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt_19081
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <qT@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and\nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy\nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle 0 some of the mess at the\nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:52:46 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "today only"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021818.txt_19082
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021818.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporers. It doesn't feel right, Xoxoxo They called my friencMtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, I like where it's going.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out M, in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "it was only meant as a pun on."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 8:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, cute„ just a joke about people's unique sensitivities. You must have heard many this week. How are You doing?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt_19086
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily east?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do \nwith his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with \nbeautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I \nalways judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've \nnever seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would \nbelieve him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, \nKrauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a \nthoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who \nhave been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against \nEpstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or \nrational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is \npossible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with \nunderage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you \nwant to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were \nunderage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such \ncircumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage \nof him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine \nhis life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for \nsomething that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I \nfully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with \nJeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI \nknow and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, \nbecause in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of \nthe young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, \nand I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very \nstrongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the \ntime to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. \nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution \nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily east?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from \nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what. \n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?\n\nLawrence Krauss"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 2:05:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "PS. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and I am therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt_19087
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt
subject: My sister's perspective from Europe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:26:33 PM", "subject": "My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "am looking at this from over here in Germany. American politics gets reduced in the end to only a few \nissues: pro-life or pro-choice, gun laws, and establishment vs. anti-establishment. Political categories \nare so wishy washy and intermingled with what is termed 'liberal' and 'conservative' that one forgets \nwhat they actually mean. \nof course, not everybody who voted for Trump is sexist or a racist, but, on some level, they didn't care \nif he is. He knew how to gather momentum with the discourse he chose, and, even if he changes his tone, \nhe has let loose a storm. We will brace ourselves over here for Putin's eventual takeover of the Baltic \nStates. Putin has extended his power back into Republic of Georgia, the Crimea, and Armenia. Trump has \nsaid that he would not come to the aid of Nato allies if they were attacked. Is is the least of our \nproblems here in Germany; Erdogan is a much larger threat, for now. \nddon't see Hillary Clinton as being at fault. I see the growth of nationalism (all throughout the world, \nnot just in the USA) and an underestimation of the fear that non-Hispanic whites have about the \ntrajectory they are on to become a minority (in the USA and other European countries). \nEvery news show, talk show, etc here is discussing and analysing the fallout of Trump's win. German \npoliticians are hoping to learn from it, to stem the growth of the right wing AFD party here. As far as \nknow, Merkel is the only leader who congratulated Trump with a warning."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt_19089
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt
subject: Re: Chatter
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/1/2017 12:44:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "when you bring a donkey to the Kentucky derby you won't get into the starting gate and you certainly won't cross the finish line. This donkey brought four racehorses who will get to the finish line! This was my major role hopefully we have a way forward."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2016, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "Fun?"}, {"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt_19090
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt
subject: Republican convention speakers Donald Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 AM", "subject": "Republican convention speakers Donald Trump", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/republican-convention-speakers-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 11:59:52 AM", "subject": "Republican convention speakers Donald Trump", "body": "funny you sent as 1 just read and saw Peter Thiel speaking\niam hoping he will have some surprises as well.\n\npolls getting closer..\n\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton CBS News/NY Times\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Economist/Y ouGov\n\nClinton 40, Trump 40 Tie\nClinton 45, Trump 43 Clinton +2"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt_19109
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt
subject: Re: no chile
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "have cancelled my flight to chile.. did so while on way to jfk and found a flight to portland at the same time.. will be home tonight.. can we talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>"], "timestamp": "Jan 14, 2018, at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "why?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:36 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "so.. what do you think of the letter on the whole? This is very scary, but I see that they keep contacting students, postdocs etc, and are not letting up.. I really need your feedback. will talk tomorrow.. on plane now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "Of course"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 2:57:30 AM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "He publicly shed and defend ed his told in publishing trash. Right to know I think you should distinguish yourself from trump"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt_19112
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt
subject: ILE MOUSTIQUE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 11:53:06 AM", "subject": "RE: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "OK great I will ask the accounting department to prepare and send the first request. \nGood luck with the government..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda PINTO"], "timestamp": "jeudi 24 novembre 2016 18:09", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "please do so. I am having a meeting with the government on the 15th re foreigb workers , painters. etc. sorry \n, its beeen crazy with trump people here in palm beach"}, {"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nSince your last meeting in Paris and the meeting on site I have had no news from you. I would \njust like to know if you intend to go ahead with the interior design work because Florence is \nblocked and waiting. If you want to do it and since about —70-80-90% of the project is \napproved then why don't we start with what is sure and for the remaining points, such as the \nkitchen, we can see about these the next time you are in Paris. \nAs for the kitchen I understand new samples were sent yesterday. These samples are in grey \nwhich is not a very bright color for a beach house kitchen where perhaps blue might be more \nappropriate. Let's see. \nIf you would like us to do the project we will send you a budget recap for the points agreed \nupon along with our first account and fees. \nBig kisses,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt_19113
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press. \nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster. \nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 2:50:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt_19114
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt
subject: Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ed Boyden <a>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\n\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\n\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\n\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching...\n\nBest,\nEd"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil Gershenfeld"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. Iam so\nvery sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this will\nbe a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 17, 2014", "subject": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 1:47:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Today or tomorowb"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt_19123
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt
subject: Re: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa Ne"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift.\n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money.\n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking--Modernism) and including three episodes of tv.\n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBB), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more.\n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs.\n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250.\n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar_) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible.\n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026193.txt_19124
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026193.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<MMIIIIMIM>"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "<MMIIIIMIM>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": "- MMIIMIM", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 10:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° \nwhenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt_19126
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [RR vote]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [RR vote]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Big trouble"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does he flip"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 11:32:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt_19128
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt
subject: Beoing update
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 4:34:41 PM", "subject": "Beoing update", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nBoeing status:\n\nBoeing will be completed May 6th,.\n-re weigh\n\n-three mandatory AD compliance\n\n-FDR Flight Data recorder repair,.\n\n-leak in flap drive gear box,.\n\nC5 check will be accomplished July 30th,.\nThe maintenance facility is completing \"Trumps\" New Boeing 757 at this time here,. Eric Roth is doing the interior,. | was\ntold Trump sold his B727 to a person in Singapore??\n\nthx,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt_19129
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sicgal"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. 1 want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. Iam sick as a dog with a cold. I am supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a\ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist?\n\nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the\nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show\ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on.\n\nT have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried...I have emailed three doctors this morning!\nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call.\n\nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in\nthe planes.\n\nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because it's 3D.\n\nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue....it's going to be highest grossing film in the world is an\nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sicga"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow.. no cleaning. stay in bed.. sorry.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt_19133
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt
subject:
  Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 3:36:08 AM", "subject": "Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029547.txt_19139
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029547.txt
subject: Re: boosting strategy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon.\n\nChristina Galbraith"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the\napproach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure\nour URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a\nlimiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.\n\nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once\nthey are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first\npage. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second\npage they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)\n\nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we\ncan provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the\n\"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was\nchanging up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated\nfirst page.\n\nI feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit\npermission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives.\n\nI hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is\nwell. Do you know if he's out of the office ?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nIm at a Kinko's.\n\nI see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the\n.org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page.\n\nThanks for you input.\n\nChristina"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt_19141
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt
subject: Re: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "On the shuttle back to NYC. About to take off."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt_19145
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt
subject: Re: Kenya
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal <peggysiegal@example.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "We are sitting in the Amsterdam airport about to take off for Nair. Headed to Cottar's Camp in the Masai Mara....got Mattie in tow... she is dressed as a runaway in ripped jeans and a hoodie and sits on the floor of every airport repacking her knapsack. She is now passed out, like the homeless. Will take photos and send.\n\nWe are going to photograph ourselves with the Masai in the mud huts and say we crashed the winter White house and are posing with Obama's relatives. Miss you. Keep you posted.\n\nDid you see Sarah, the D on tv or speak to her?\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "12/19/2009 8:25:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "you will be amazed by the aroma"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt_19146
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt
subject: Re: Keating Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:33:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Yes. Just arrived back from San Fran."}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 28, 2011, at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 28, 2011, at 12:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Paul Keating explains as never before\n\ne BY:PAUL KELLY, EDITOR-AT-LARGE\n° From:The Australian\ne October 22, 2011 12:00AM\n\nhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/paul-keating-explains-as-never-before/story-e6frg6z6-\n12261734930298&ct=ga&cad=CAcQAhgAIAAoATAAOABAKPKISQRIAVAAWABIBWVULVVT&cd=JW80AO0ivU\nQM&usg=AFQiCNHdOmUbAjc-Z2liiig3_exEbZmRt2w"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt_19149
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt
subject: Re: ICYMI
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "7/5/2015 9:30:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "ICYMI\n\nMy occasional roundup of interesting links and\nwriting I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\n\nNew and Notable\n\n° We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock\nPartners. LINK\n\ne And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the\nLinkedIn team! LINK\n\ne Change.org celebrates its 100 million users\nmilestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO\n\nBen Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n\ne Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new\ncivic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor market.\"\n\nTom Friedman's post: LINK\n\n° Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer\n\nonline coding camp using Minecraft. LINK\nWorthwhile Reads\n\ne Jeff Weiner: How LinkedIn is Helping Power the\nPresident's Tech Jobs Initiative LINK\n\ne The New Yorker: R U There? - Nancy Lublin and\nCrisis Text Line LINK\n\n° Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n\n° Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined\n\nInfrastructure LINK"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt_19158
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:01:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029235.txt_19161
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029235.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major\n\nhuman disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt_19162
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt
subject: Chatter
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2016 11:57:08 PM", "subject": "Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031174.txt_19163
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031174.txt
subject: Re: Larry Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nI work for Larry Summers and as you may have heard, we are stranded in St. Thomas \nand the airlines are saying we can't get out until Thursday. \nOur names: \nKelly Friendly \nAndrew Friendly \nMy cell is below or you can reach my husband Andrew Friendly on his cell at \nYou may have met him when he was President Clinton's aide. \nWe would be so grateful for any help you could provide."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "my friend andrew farkas has a pretty full plane to ny tomorrwo but can take 1 or 2 of \nyou. i can call other hotels wher we have pull.. my cars and drivers are at your \ndisposal."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Fantastic. If possible, could my daughter and I go back with Mr. \nFarkas? \nPlease let me know how best to follow up. We may have found a condo by red hook but \nhaven't found a car yet. \nLet me know how to follow up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "________________________ . andrew farkas is flying tomorrow. please contact him directly \nand as soon as you are ready i will organize the use of my car."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Excellent. I will email him now. \nIf it's not too much of an inconvenience we would love to use the car. Is it available around 3? \nWe are staying by the airport...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine, please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 4 2014 06:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much. \nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt_19166
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt
subject: Re: | beat Bush
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["eee"], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:22:56 PM", "subject": "Re: | beat Bush", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 3 February 2016", "subject": "Re: | beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nI got more votes than Jeb Bush got in Iowa, and I only had one congressional district, he had four!! It’s so\nfunny (to me — totally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump and might be a delegate to the republican\n\nconvention.\n\nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St.\nJeff and it was beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the\n\nwater where the divers go....\n\nLove ya,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt_19174
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "im in wed, fri. edelman?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:47:56 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Cash or in-kind services?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031612.txt_19188
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031612.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:34:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "nuts but i thought you guys should know"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg <IMIMI>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number i\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt_19202
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt
subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it \nwould take us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I \ntaped Woody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \n\nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \n\nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \n\nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \n\nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \n\nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \n\nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances?\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \n\nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \n\nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:35:13 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "better list to present woody"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033107.txt_19203
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033107.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid [as]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 10:36:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "palm beach."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt_19204
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt
subject: (BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street M
messages:
  [{"sender": "Glenn Dubin (DUBIN & COMPANY LP)", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:;"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 27 2017 05:02 PM", "subject": "(BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street M", "body": "(BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model\n\nLeon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model\n2017-12-27 11:00:00.2 GMT\nBy Simone Foxman and David Carey\n\n(Bloomberg) -- Leon Black recently posed a question whose answer will determine how profitable the new U.S. tax regime could make Wall Street firms like his Apollo Global Management LLC.\n\nPublicly traded partnerships, such as Apollo, are taxed differently than corporations. So should Apollo take advantage of the overhauled tax rules to pay less in taxes? Or should it use this chance to change to an Inc. from an LLC, which would increase its tax bill but allow it to attract investments from mutual funds that have previously been out of reach?\n\n\"We're still analyzing,\" Black told the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference Dec. 6. \"It's an uncertain outcome.\"\n\nEither way, it's most likely a money-making outcome. The tax changes are a boon for private equity firms such as Apollo, where Black is chief executive officer. The new lower corporate rate has made it possible for bigger publicly traded partnerships to consider the change. As it is, management fees, which typically account for 30 percent or more of their earnings, are already taxed at the corporate rate. That will drop. The legislation scarcely touched the 23.8 percent rate paid on incentive fees, also called carried interest, which incur no additional levy when paid out to shareholders.\n\nDouble Tax\nIf the partnerships converted to corporations, the incentive fees would be hit with a second layer of tax when they're paid out. That would push the combined tax rate on incentive income paid out as dividends to nearly 40 percent, according to Peter Furci, co-chair of Debevoise & Plimpton's global tax practice.\n\nBut it would also allow the newly minted corporations access to indexes, and therefore the mutual-fund and ETF markets. About $2.2 trillion follows the S&P 500 Index, according to its website. As of June, $122.6 billion in assets tracked the Russell 2000 Index, the best-known small-cap U.S. stock index, and there was $1.1 trillion bet on Russell U.S. indexes overall, according to the company.\n\nThe bigger universe of investors would likely boost the trading multiples of the firms' stocks. It's unclear how big the economic benefit of increased ownership would be, so the question is whether it would make up for the higher taxes.\n\n\"There's no way to say how much multiple expansion you could get by converting,\" said Gerald O'Hara, who follows private equity firms for Jefferies Group. \"That's the question here that I think these firms are wrestling with.\"\n\nTax Complexity\nOne of the main reasons the funds have stayed away from private equity managers is tax complexity. Investors in typical stocks receive a Form 1099, a straightforward document that shows interest and dividends on investments at the end of each year. Owners of publicly traded private equity firms' stock get the Schedule K-1 instead. The K-1 shows their share of the partnership's interest, which determines how much the income is taxed. It's a headache, O'Hara said. Plus, firms can be inconsistent on the time of year they send out the forms, and the process of plugging in the numbers on a Schedule K-1 isn't as simple as it is for other kinds of income.\n\nSo asset managers, which offer options for many 401(k) investors, avoid buying shares of private equity firms.\n\nOn the campaign trail last year, President Donald Trump said he wasn't a fan of Wall Street \"paper pushers\" like hedge fund managers. He pledged to raise the tax rate on carried interest. The new tax law keeps it unchanged for investments held at least three years.\n\nHamilton Lane\nProponents of conversion to corporations point to Hamilton Lane Inc., an alternative-investment manager and pension-fund consultant that's a corporation and not a publicly traded partnership. The $1.9 billion company, which went public earlier this year, is now included in dozens of S&P, Russell and WisdomTree Investments Inc. indexes. Hamilton Lane shares have about doubled since the initial public offering.\n\nAres Management LP, created by former Apollo executives, is the most likely of its peers to make the jump, according to analysts at Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc. Much of its revenue comes from management fees, so becoming a corporation would hurt its after-tax earnings relatively little.\n\nBill Mendel of Mendel Communications, a spokesman for Ares, said the firm is studying the situation. Apollo spokesman Charles Zehren of Rubenstein Associates declined to comment.\n\nWhen Black spoke to the Goldman Sachs conference, he said he was certain of one thing: None of the big publicly traded partnerships wanted to be first to undergo conversion.\n\n\"If somebody does go first and their stock doesn't move up, then you'll know that was a pretty dumb decision,\" he said. If, on the other hand, the \"stock does great, then all of us may have converted\" in two or three years.\n\n--With assistance from Ben Steverman and Carolina Wilson."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt_19215
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt
subject: Bobby Slayton
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "ee", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "9/10/2012 5:01:27 PM", "subject": "Bobby Slayton", "body": "Bobby Slayton will be in LA on Sept. 18th (he said if you are hosting Obama in NY though, he could make the effort to attend)\n\nBelow from Bobby re the dinner he would like to have:\n\n> AND Tuesday the 16th is perfect for dinner with David And Lewis And if Woody Makes it GREAT, if not, always fun to hang with JE!!! David Brenner said he would try to change his flight if only Monday works! ! But the boys are definately in for Tuesday!!!\n\nMay I tell Bobby the 16th is good for dinner AND invite Woody?\n\nLyn & Jojo are back to work on Oct. 16th (they are home on 15th)\n\nLinda Stone will be in NY and staying in an apt Oct. 13-17"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028498.txt_19234
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028498.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\nBest,"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Pegsy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032821.txt_19235
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032821.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:48:46 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect I am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033281.txt_19239
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033281.txt
subject: Poll: Trump closing in on Clinton
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/19/2015 5:48:50 PM", "subject": "Poll: Trump closing in on Clinton", "body": "http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/251425-poll-trump-closing-in-on-clinton"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt_19245
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "The Duke <j", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Awitheridg@aol.com", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following guestions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers cs a oc\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. PS says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032543.txt_19249
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032543.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2017 3:07:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "just finished watching trump speech, he did well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2017, at 1:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very complex. I passed your message. . in addition Im not sure what role you and your boss would like to\nplay in the yemen issue moving forward. . I think to progress what you and terje have spoken about, the rebel\n\nleaders are ready to propose a document they woudl like a cease fire , and halt .\n\nIf you like I can pass on their\n\nproposal. THIS IS NOT WHATIDO. my expertise is only money. . but it seems like your part of the world\n\nwould like advice. very complex for me."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt_19252
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Sirs"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which — | and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad", "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:27:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033295.txt_19255
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033295.txt
subject: Fw: Washington Post Article
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/13/2016 12:31:13 AM", "subject": "Fw: Washington Post Article", "body": "Thought u would be interested in this\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/20 1 6/05/12/california-allies-roll-out-new-pro-trump-super-pac-with-aim-of-raising-20-million-by-july/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026420.txt_19262
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026420.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Governor Kenneth E. Mapp"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10 2016 10:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <eevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030242.txt_19264
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030242.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mariana ldikowska"], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late \nPresident himself. As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a \njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of \npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas \nshould themselves feel ashamed. \nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the \nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are \nslanderous. \nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little \nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government \nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the \nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete \nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the \nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in \nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\" \nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would man he - or his \nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go \nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party \nfor only two months.., so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially \neverything to lose in the June vote. \nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy \nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover \nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal \nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the \nmemory of those who died. \nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to cone in the coming presidential campaign - \nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the \npresidency. \nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obarna is not \nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course, \nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous. \nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abikiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on \nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago \nas well, and commented on with deep sorrow and respect by U.S. politicians from Mayor Daley to President \nObama himself"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032835.txt_19265
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032835.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J Deevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/19/2019 12:56:20 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Please call me"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 18, 2019 7:44 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/business/trump-deutsche-bank.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt_19285
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Article 1.\n\nWashington Post\n\nObama to make first trip to Israel, part of a potential new beginning with region.\n\nPresident Obama will travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories next month to make an early second-term push for peace negotiations between two divided governments and to assess the broader political developments remaking the Middle East.\n\nIt will be Obama’s first trip as president to Israel, where suspicions run high in the aftermath of his unsuccessful early efforts at Middle East peacemaking.\n\nThe choice of destination — one that Obama avoided in his first term — suggests a revival of his ambitions abroad after a year of virtual dormancy on foreign affairs. The timing also points to a willingness on his part to quickly reengage a politically volatile foreign-"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt_19286
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. Would you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:51:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good? are you coming to New York next week?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt_19302
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 08, 2016 9:07 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 2:14:46 AM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Attachments: Redline of 10-7-16 Revisions to Opp by DKI.docx MGW EDITS.docx"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt_19304
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt
subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Rich Beckler", "Ken Adams"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being tracked."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 5:57:07 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Too down...give me another day"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030675.txt_19306
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030675.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt_19307
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt
subject: Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM", "subject": "Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even if. is discredited by people will know JE paid her off and believe G was complicate absent a credible denial. \nNow it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will be made. \nIt is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial. \nI can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast. \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "Ross", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 18:42", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today. \nHe would have give us a better hearing than most I figure. \nStrongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The Times on Monday. \nRest up and speak Monday \nBest \nRoss"}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All \nI am back on line now. \nI see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow? \nI will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked there is less heat on him. \nEither is lying or not. If we let her lie without challenge then the lies become the reality and that may lead to you facing investigation. These are serious allegations and In the UK prosecuting people who face allegations of sex abuse is now common place and a lot of resources are focused on this. \nWe can't sit back and let you be a conspirator by silence. \nYour are not guilty and must follow Dershowtiz line. He is a leading lawyer and he hasn't followed the don't say anything for fear of litigation. He has rightly called . bluff and shouted his innocence. \nYou have to stand up and deny the allegations or be branded guilty by association and that may lead to other investigations and worse. \nI feel I am going around in circles. \nI know what is right to do and that is to shout your innocence. \nTry and get some rest. Call me tomorrow if you want anytime. \nSpeak to Deshowitz. \nDon't allay yourself to JE as that is not the way to go. \nBest \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 16:02", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don't want to end up in a law suit aimed at me from anyone if I can help it. Apparently even saying is a her has hazard! I have never been in a suit criminal or civil and want it to stay that way. \nThe US lawyers for the Jane Does are filling additional discovery motions and if I speak I open my self to being part of discovery apparently. I am trying to stay out of litigation and not have to employ lawyers for years as I get lost in US legal nightmare. I stand no legal risk currently on these old charges and civil suits against Jeffrey \nWe need to consult with US lawyers on any statement I make and the complaints too \nPerhaps we make a statement of the legal risk of saying anything for potential defamation or something that prevents a full and frank detailed rebuttal + the press not being the place for that? Regardless, Philip plse call jeffrey lawyer and see what you can understand from him and pehaps craft something in conjunction with him? \nEither way I think you need to speak to him to understand my risk so you can help me understand it - too may cooks in the kitchen and I can't make good decisions. Plse reach out to him today \n+ I have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can't even see what life after press he'll even looks like - statements that don't address all just lead to more questions. .what is my relationship to clinton ? Andrew on and on. \nLet's rest till monday. I need head space"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt_19308
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner | a |", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:12:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "James Drougas <j", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially.\nHe was in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last\nnight he told me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him\nif he would join the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many\nmonths. Alas he was laughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump.\n\nWarm and loving regards\n\nJim Drougas\n\nMy friend Alana, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to\n147. Alana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt_19311
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 17, 2010 7:32 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "woody asked summer , so what do you do? 30 minutes later , she had not taken a breath. . either medicated, or manic..,,\n\nDo ee ee ee ee ee i ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2010 1:13:39 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Neither very funny...always ask for the 3 minute version but most of the girls you Know haven't spoken for a total of 30\nminutes in all the time you knew them....she is a GREAT girl who is refreshing in this business totally focused and smart.\nJeffrey | brought her to a meeting with scientists a few months back she knew more than they did and totally embarrassed\nnot only the scientists but the client was totally unprepared for what she knew, she actually was able to tell them things\nthey were and weren't doing that they had no clue of and they changed there practices at p&g!!!! this is the kind of girl to\nmold she is the leader in her field of sustainability ny times wrote an article if you cant afford al gore hire summer rayne\nsays something.\n\nXOXO"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt_19329
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 11:38:59 PM", "subject": null, "body": "WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump held the first meeting of his full Cabinet today, vowing to take the fight against terrorism to the very end and said \"we are going to starve the beast\" by stopping its funding. \n\n\"One of the big things that we did - and you're seeing it now with Qatar and all of the things that are actually going on in a very positive fashion - we are stopping the funding of terrorism,\" Trump told reporters at the White House. \n\nRead more at:\nhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59116707.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst\n\n--"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031231.txt_19335
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031231.txt
subject:
  JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD POLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DONE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\n\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\n\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR\n\nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE.\n\nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM\nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST\nJEFF EPSTEIN !!!!\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE\nGIRLS WI!!\nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN IS NOT IN FEDERAL PRISON ONLY BECAUSE JEFF EPSTEIN IS HOLDING TH"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt_19344
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to\n\nTrump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd...I have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we\nwants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:18:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt_19347
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt
subject: Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/19/2018 5:30:40 PM", "subject": "Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare", "body": "https://www.lawfareblog.com/indicting-president-not-foreclosed-complex-history\n\nIndicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The\nComplex History\n\nCan a sitting president be indicted? Often, in answering this question, commentators point to\nOffice of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions answering in the contrary. To whatever extent the\nwriter agrees or disagrees with the opinions’ conclusion, the government’s position on the\nmatter is usually presented as a long-standing and clear “no.”\n\nThe reality is more complicated. The United States has addressed this question six times 1n\nboth internal memos and briefs filed in litigation. And a review of these documents shows\nthat it is far from clear what criminal prosecution steps are (or should be) precluded—and\nthat there is no “longstanding policy” against indictment of the president. Consider the 1973\nOLC memo stating that a sitting president should not be indicted. Far from being\nauthoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the\nUnited States’ filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon.\n\nLikewise, the most recent opinion—an OLC memo written in 2000—includes brief\nstatements that a sitting president should not be indicted even if all further proceedings are\npostponed. But far from being definitive, this 1s a matter that could be reconsidered by the\ndepartment. Moreover, of course, OLC opinions are not binding on state prosecutors (though\nstate charges could raise federalism questions as well). The complex history of criminal\nproceedings against presidents and vice presidents suggests that these issues are not\nforeclosed.\n\nPerhaps the most important point that emerges from a review of all the opinions 1s this: nly\nonce has the United States addressed the question of whether a president can be an\nunindicted co-conspirator. The conclusion was an unequivocal yes. Richard Nixon was so\nnamed in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica\nand defended by the United States in United States v. Nixon. (The Supreme Court did not\nresolve the question.) No department opinion or filing has ever contradicted that position.\nThe fact that it is permissible to name a sitting president as unindicted co-conspirator,\nmoreover, tends significantly to undermine the only argument against tndicting a sitting\npresident."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032005.txt_19359
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032005.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\n\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone’s groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it.\n\nIn 1987, right after director Oliver Stone won the Academy Award for \"Platoon,\" he immediately turned to a domestic arena and began working on \"Wall Street\" in New York City where his father had been a stockbroker. Although the film was widely seen as a scathing critique of the culture of Wall Street, Stone has said that part of the film is a defense of capitalism, his father's vision of finance (as seen through the Hal Holbrook character) and an homage to his father.\n\nAt the time Oliver was also fascinated with the connection between the psyche of Latino Miami drug dealers from his earlier \"Scarface\" script and the American-born 28- to 35-year-old, white collar stockbrokers. Both groups had an animalistic need to obtain big and fast money. They shared an obsession with corruption and greed.\n\nOliver sent his actors to Bear Stearns for research, including then-newcomer Charlie Sheen, who played Bud Fox, a kid from nowhere. When he learns to cold call, and lands one big client, Gordon Gekko, Fox is thrust into the fast lane with a rock star financial mentor who teaches him corruption.\n\nOliver needed an old-fashioned villain to create drama, and he cast Michael Douglas as Gekko against type. Michael was not known as a heavy at the time, but as a charming, handsome, sensitive leading man. Oliver also saw the anger, confidence, salesmanship and style that Michael brought to the role. Michael's Gekko looked a bit like Laker's coach Pat Riley with his slicked back hair and well-cut suits, and it became Michael’s most important role, winning him the Academy Award for the villain no one could ever forget."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt_19363
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gqmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <borisnikolic@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\n\nIt is fun for a short time but I am already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\n\nHow are you?\n\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem. I am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\n\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some cocktail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt_19365
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://pcople.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <11.>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 3:00:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt_19371
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic", "possibly"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt_19377
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:21:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.\n\nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our\n\nFacebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.\n\nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is\n\nexpensive and the start up is running out of money.\n\nIam going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\n\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032011.txt_19380
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032011.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 2:14:44 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Mueller statement at 1lam will be interesting - I think it's because of Michael wolff'’s new book and the\nreference to a draft indictment- it probably will be helpful to DIT - talk after"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012680.txt_19389
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012680.txt
subject: Menchel
messages:
  [{"sender": "A.", "recipients": ["Lilly"], "timestamp": "Fri, -----", "subject": "Menchel", "body": "Dear Lilly:\nThank you for your letter of August 2nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter.\n\nAs we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for negotiations, it is the minimum term of imprisonment that will obviate the need for federal prosecution. The Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein preferred to serve his sentence in a federal penetentiary, we would be willing to explore a federal conviction that may allow that in lieu of any state resolution. Further, as I made clear in"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032107.txt_19391
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032107.txt
subject: ASW Travel Deals: Sky Dive Mount Everest, See New York's Newest, Do Paris's Chicest
messages:
  [{"sender": "asmallworld@travel.asmallworld.net", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "8/3/2011 2:11:03 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: Sky Dive Mount Everest, See New York's Newest, Do Paris's Chicest", "body": "\"New and noteworthy\" is a term that gets tossed around a lot in the travel world, but we're taking it seriously to heart this week at Jetsetter. The \"new\" is the Dream Downtown NYC, a hip, reinvented space at the crossroads of Chelsea and the Meatpacking District (MePa, if you really must). The \"noteworthy\" is a little thing called skydiving at Mount Everest. Whether it's lounging poolside in New York or jumping out of a plane in full view of the world's highest mountain, there's a lot going on this week. Read on for all the details, including properties in Paris, San Francisco, Vegas, Miami and more. (Image: Skydive Mount Everest - on sale Sat, Aug 6.)\n\nHip Manhattan Newcomer... with Real Sand\n\nDream Downtown - NYC\n\nThe new Dream Downtown has the best of both worlds. Housed in a 1960s building designed by Albert C. Ledner, it's situated at the crux of Manhattan's art, design and nightlife scenes between Chelsea and the Meatpacking District. With a hot rooftop bar, a Miami-meets-Ibiza pool (with lounge chairs set in real sand) and modern rooms with classic Downtown views, you can have your party and a good night's sleep, too.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nRomance by the Arc de Triomphe\n\nMon Hotel - Paris\n\nJust a short walk from the Arc de Triomphe, Mon Hotel sits on a quiet street off the bustling boulevards. Designer Aurélia Santoni fashioned this intimate boutique property with eccentricity and flair; lampshades from Dutch design firm Moooi hang above Utrecht armchairs in the lobby. Above all, the style of the guestrooms and the service stress comfort; Mon feels like your personal Paris pied-à-terre.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nBeach, Spa, Repeat in Crete\n\nCandia Maris Resort - Crete\n\nJust outside Heraklion, Crete's capital city, the Candia Maris is a sprawling beachside resort spanning nearly 10 acres. Although the property lacks the charm of smaller hotels, it more than compensates with its amenities, which include tennis courts and seven pools. The highlight is the vast thalassotherapy spa, which underwent a multimillion-dollar renovation in 2008.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nSleep in a Palace in Portugal\n\nVidago Palace - Portugal\n\nIn the mountainous north of the country, just over an hour from Porto, the recently opened Vidago Palace has, in one fell swoop, raised the bar for luxury getaways in Portugal. As far removed from the sun and sand of the touristy Algarve as you can get, this is a destination for the discerning traveler and the lover of fine things, whether they be cigars, hand-painted silk wallpaper, the country's best spa or a championship golf course.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nThe Budapest Bauhaus\n\nMamaison Hotel Budapest\n\nLeisure and business travelers feel like locals at this historic boutique hotel set among the embassies and grand residences of Budapest's tree-lined Andrassy Avenue. Built in 1937 and completely renovated three years ago, the hotel is home to a hip-again Bauhaus style in the comfortable rooms and gourmet dining at on-site Baraka Restaurant. For exploring, you can't beat the location: It's a short walk to restaurants, parks, museums and the city's famed thermal baths.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nA Study in Swiss Chic\n\nCervo - Switzerland\n\nThe Cervo may have a Swiss address, but there's nothing neutral about this boutique hotel's atmosphere and hospitality. In Zermatt, a legendary ski village where the Matterhorn (\"Horu\" to locals) dominates the landscape (and the activities, yearround) the hotel has the requisite majestic views. But modern interiors and quirky accents like antlers and cheerful checkerboard patterns make the Cervo a study in Swiss chic.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nLiving the Fantasy in Las Vegas\n\nThe Palms - Las Vegas\n\nThe Palms Las Vegas is all about classic hedonism: nightlife, gambling, pool parties and sweet guestrooms for more after-hours fun. Within the Palms enclave, the Palms Fantasy Tower flaunts a cool, contemporary feel to suit the tastes of its young and stylish party-hard crowds, perfect for hosting the true \"what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas\" experience.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nA Classic San Francisco Stay\n\nOmni San Francisco Hotel\n\nIn a beautifully renovated redbrick-and-stone former bank building, the Omni San Francisco has an elegant ambiance and draws inspiration from Renaissance Florence. The spacious rooms have carved-mahogany furniture and nine-foot-high crown molded ceilings, while sparkling crystal chandeliers, mahogany paneling and an iron-and-marble staircase define the lobby. Best of all, it's within walking distance from some of the city's top attractions like Union Square, North Beach and Chinatown.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nHilltop Romance on Phuket\n\nThe Pavilions - Phuket\n\nThese hilltop retreats are some of Phuket's most romantic crash pads thanks to sublime panoramic Andaman Sea views and the island's most discreet staff. All villas include swimmable pools and roomy decks for sun and shade. The 360 bar attracts the island's best dressed inhabitants who flock here at sundown for the calm view then stay sipping colorful cocktails late into the warm night.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nBeachfront Zen Near Cancun\n\nLa Amada Hotel - Playa Mujeres\n\nLooking more like some millionaire's Miami crib than a traditional Cancún resort, the all white, Zen-minimalist La Amada Hotel exudes a down-to-earth sexiness and an understated elegance - all creamy sofas, gauzy curtains and personal Jacuzzis. Just 20 minutes north of central Cancún in Playa Mujeres, La Amada is on a long, pristine and very secluded beach.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nStately Style in the Heart of Washington D.C.\n\nThe Madison - D.C.\n\nNamed for James Madison, the fourth president and \"father of the Constitution,\" this stately hotel has traditional style and refined service - plus, a location that puts many of Washington's must-see museums and monuments along the Mall within walking distance. Opened in 1963, the 353-room hotel has hosted the Dalai Lama, the occasional celebrity and every U.S. president since John F. Kennedy except Barack Obama. But don't worry - you can stop by the White House, which is just five blocks away.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nWhere Esther Williams Meets Chanel\n\nThe Raleigh - South Beach\n\nThe Raleigh is different from most properties in South Beach, with a vibe that's more Deco cool than decked out to the nines. A stay here feels a bit like a trip to the 1940s - dressed in whites one minute, casual the next. It's all about lounging in style by the pool, which has hosted everything from Esther Williams swimming routines to Chanel's cruise collection show. The Raleigh itself is a lot like that pool: cool, pretty and a place to be seen.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST\n\nThe Classic SoCal Beach Escape\n\nShorebreak - California\n\nShorebreak, a 157-room hotel on Huntington Beach, lives up to the SoCal lifestyle celebrated on breezy beach postcards. From your private balcony, you'll gaze over a classic California coast pier, with the Pacific stretching out behind it. Surf by day, then chow down on room-service orecchiette pasta with seared diver scallops before heading out to a beachside bonfire.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST\n\nAttention Adrenaline Junkies\n\nSkydive Mount Everest\n\nAs any adrenaline junkie knows, skydiving is the ultimate thrill: Those few seconds during free fall are as close to flying as we humans will probably ever get. Now imagine hurling yourself out of a plane at 29,500 feet - in full view of Mount Everest. To call it a rush would be an understatement, but tour company Everest Skydive makes this once-in-a-lifetime experience possible. During this 10-night/11-day tour, beginning in Kathmandu, you'll get your bearings on the ground with some sightseeing and then hike up to the drop site, where the true adventure begins. And with all the details - accommodations, gear, professional instruction - taken care of, skydivers can simply enjoy the (truly unforgettable) moment.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST\n\nThe South African Safari Goes Posh\n\nMorukuru - South Africa\n\nIn the heart of the Madikwe Game Reserve, Morukuru Family's trio of boutique-chic, exclusive lodging options are the perfect pick for small groups seeking an intimate, totally tailor-made bush adventure. Half wild, half unabashedly posh, the getaway is less than a four-hour drive - or an even shorter charter plane ride - from Johannesburg. Choose between the Owners House, the Lodge or the Farm, and the the only people you'll share sundowners and lion cub photos ops with will be the pack you arrived with. Family-friendly and super flexible, this is a true South African safari vacation, complete with personal cooks, butlers and animal trackers at your service.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST\n\nSales this week\n\nStarting Today at 8pm BST\nMamaison Hotel Budapest \nSofitel Montreal Golden Mile \nCervo - Switzerland \n\nStarting Thursday at 8pm BST\nThe Shores - Daytona Beach \nThe Raleigh - South Beach \nShorebreak - California \n\nStarting Friday at 5pm BST\nVeranda House - Nantucket \n\nStarting Friday at 8pm BST\nIron Horse Hotel - Milwaukee \nHidden Pond - Maine \nKedron Valley Inn - Vermont \n\nStarting Saturday at 5pm BST\nA Culinary Retreat in Mexico \nMorukuru - South Africa \nSkydive Mount Everest \n\nStarting Sunday at 5pm BST\nThe Alexandra - Turks & Caicos \n\nStarting Sunday at 8pm BST\nLas Alamandas - Mexico \nArenas del Mar Beachfront \nBlue Waters - Antigua \nNayara Hotel, Spa & Gardens \n\nStarting Monday at 8pm BST\nHotel Matilda - San Miguel \nSanta Teresa - Rio De Janeiro"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt_19395
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt
subject:
  EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA

messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [nn"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:24:59 PM", "subject": "EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA", "body": "We remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\n\nGlobal Equities Z\n\nBank of America\n\nSpecialist Sales — European Financials Merrill Lynch\n\nMAR disclosure\n\nEU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE\n\nSpec Sales Comment:\n\nBofAML SESE See ee oe oe eee outflows in 40 weeks and first outflows YTD (click here). Our BofAML Bull & Bear Indicator is now at 7.1, the highest level since Jul'14 and not far from \"sell\" signal. So is this just a pause for breath in the reflation trade? BofAML strategists think so. In our updated thoughts this morning we think reflation is real so stay long equities, short rates, selectively long USD (click here).\n\nChart 12: BofAML B&B Indicator (scale from 0 to 10)\n\nExtreme\nBearish                           Bullish\n\nSource: BofA Merill Lynch Global Investment Strategy\n\nThe main reasons for equity investor concern in recent weeks = the gap between hard and soft data, plus the delay in the Trump fiscal package"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt_19417
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andrew M Grossman <andrew.grossman@bakerlaw.com>", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016."}, {"sender": "David Rivkin <david.rivkin@...>", "recipients": ["Andrew M Grossman"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}, {"sender": "David Rivkin", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 4:01:37 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "i htink weak thoughts?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt_19419
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt
subject: Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-30/this-chart-predicts-trump-will-win-unless-the-s-p-rallies-in-october"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 3:05:32 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "tuesday"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt_19421
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt
subject: Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathleen Ruderman/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Anne Boyles/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "07/24/2008 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "Anne,\nI have approved SPR 14-2007 and 5-2008. The Larkin item is OK. The appeal by Brindell re 144 Wells Road should not be on the agenda. The sod/seed item is an item that Tim Frank is working on but I don't think it's an agenda item. We need to check with Peter on that one. The infrastructure of large homes is not an agenda item. Neither is the Trump appeal for 515 North County Road.\nTwo things that will be added though are: EAR Amendments and Zoning Study Items."}, {"sender": "Anne Boyles/O=PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Cheryl Kleen"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:51:14 AM", "subject": "Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "FYI"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt_19425
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:38:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt_19431
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "3/2/2018 12:47:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "funn I. its a wild time"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas <IMI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted trump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund raiser for djt"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt_19436
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "DefinAely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't ,eel right, Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Mtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Apparently", "body": "They are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:00 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt_19439
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "!understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "\"girls?\"„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im oi for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes, i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I will. Thc rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt_19442
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt
subject: I don't know if they'll publish this:
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["DANNY GOLDBERG", "Sam/Walli Leff Michael Simmons"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 12:25:16 AM", "subject": "I don't know if they'll publish this:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["letterslatimes.com"], "timestamp": "February 11, 2017 at 12:56:37 PM PST", "subject": "Re:\"Comedian made an art...,\" Obituariwa, Feb. 10", "body": "The obituary of unique comedian Irwin Corey stated, \"Over a career that spanned more than 70 years, Corey performed in vaudeville, radio, television, films, Broadway, nightclubs and Las Vegas showrooms.\"\n\nIn 1983, I was fortunate to be booked as the opening act for Corey in a four-day run at the Julia Morgan Theater in Berkeley. He revealed his dark side in a room backstage, where we smoked a joint, and he told me how he used to read Nazi hate literature to get him in the mood to perform. And there was a certain sense of continuity on his deathbed. The night before he died, he said to a close friend, James Drougas, \"Trump will be assassinated soon.\"\n\n\"Professor\" Corey also had a humanitarian streak. In 1996, in my magazine, The Realist, I published a photo of him, from a video by his son Richard, presenting Fidel Castro a bag of California-grown pistachio nuts (Castro said, \"California, hmmmm, good climate there for nuts\"), a book on the Rosenberg controversy, and a credit-card-size calculator (Castro said, \"I'll have to use my little pinky to push the buttons\"). Dave Channon reported thatCorey was on a diplomatic mission to lift the embargo on health supplies to Cuba, and he visited a hospital that was providing sophisticated treatment for the survivors of Chernobyl. Cuban health care provided for more radiation victims than than did the U. .5.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt_19447
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 12:21:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "i was pointing out that that alleged rape was reported to be at my house with donald and I raping her."}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "to what wording would you suggest I change that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2017, at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "the allegation was not at a pedophile party, it was at my house with me."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt_19457
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt
subject: Small biz and Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:29:54 PM", "subject": "Small biz and Trump", "body": "It’s getting better\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n110\n\n100\n\n90\n\n80 ; :\n86 2000 16\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted. CNBC\n\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed off\nabout regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke. They\nreally dig him down there...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt_19464
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.\n* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.\n* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.\n* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "all good. thx. areas of interest, distributions in nature. 2 deception. 3. sleep . 4. power. 5 money. 6 music and the brain. 7, signal intelligence in the biological systems"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\n\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature\" issue?\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?\n\n6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as \"consciousness hacking.\" He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)\n\nMore to come in a day or so.\n\nThanks!\n\nYou're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!\n\nDavid\n\nPS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a marker. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be encrypted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of, can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own encryption de encryption algorithm built in. fyi having dinner with Jim Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nD."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probability and statistics gets its strength from the law of large numbers. centrifugal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. like gravity, lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would. could be a force similar to the EM one."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026509.txt_19470
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026509.txt
subject: Re: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS <lhsummers@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument\n\nWhat about aspects not quite in model.\n\nMore folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit. Separately I pitched this to someone today.\n\nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. Is there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric <emaskin@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhsummers@harvard.edu>"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists.\n\nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it’s important that voters be given the choice to rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one]\n\nIn fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given Ker a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere).\n\nEric"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt_19481
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal’
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner ie", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:27:09 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal’", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ann Coulter", "recipients": ["\"Friend\""], "timestamp": "March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST", "subject": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal’", "body": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile\nBecame a \"Trump Scandal'\n\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and\nmajor Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nIn 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm\nBeach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor's mansion and asked\nto have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover\ninvestigation.\n\nThe police sifted through Epstein'’s garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the\nhousemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of\nEpstein's procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025166.txt_19485
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025166.txt
subject: Re: Re: cash
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: cash", "body": "im in wed, fri. edelman?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Cash or in-kind services?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:49:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "cash"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt_19492
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt
subject: Isn't it great that...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/8/2016 3:45:09 PM", "subject": "Isn't it great that...", "body": "Trump is owning the headlines this weekend??\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt_19502
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joichi Ito <joi@...>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry. it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types im your boy. at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click &module=Opinion &pgtyp e=Homep age"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you >?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt_19508
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine\n\nMaxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon\n\ntomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt_19510
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ram", "recipients": ["jeffrey ."], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 9:29:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt_19512
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt
subject: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting. \nI admire your friends determination. \nAre you serious about working on this? \nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization. \nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George \nbush. This might be bad. \nOn other hand, gore would not have to move left to take Nader vote. \nIf I like centrism is it clear that this is better. \nI get that it avoids arbitrary outcomes but assume that a tea party nut is as likely to elect a dem as a lefty is to elect et a \nrepublican. \nAnyway thanks for setting up. \nBtw I gave them 10,000."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:05 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Hi Larry, \nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that \nAdam Friedman's commitment to the project is impressive. \nI AM serious about working on this---it's a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. \nVoting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics \nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. \nSuppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-\nright spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which \nvoters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be \nthe median voter's favorite candidate -----in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that \nthere are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe \nthat RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule. \nBest wishes, Eric"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument \nWhat about aspects not quite in model. \nMore folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit. \nSeparately I pitched this to someone today. \nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. \nIs there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are \ncloser to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists. \nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it's important that voters be given the choice to \nrank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in \neffect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three \ncandidates, but a significant fraction just rank one] \nIn fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie \nSanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many \nof the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked \nClinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly \nelsewhere)."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Are there empirical studies on turnout."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: This morning", "body": "I believe there are, but don't know how careful they are. I will try to get you references."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/12/2018 3:01:20 AM", "subject": "Fwd: This morning", "body": "More than u may want to know"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt_19518
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt
subject: Michael Boccio
messages:
  [{"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2011 4:01:33 PM", "subject": "Michael Boccio", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nRecently while refurbishing Donald Trump's 757 I worked closely with his Director of Business Development / \nSpecial Counsel, Michael Boccio. \nAlthough I have worked with some very intelligent and creative individuals, Michael is a real stand out — he is \nimpressive on many levels. \nSomeone (or organization) is going to be excited to have someone with Michael's capabilities working for them \nand thought that you may need someone like Michael on your team or have a friend who may be in search of a \ndynamic individual with his background and talent. \nPlease take a moment to read the attached documents to see if Michael is someone you are looking for. If not, \nI ask that you forward this e-mail to someone you believe would greatly benefit by having Michael work for \nthem. \nI know that I always appreciate when a friend refers someone who can be of great help to me — personally or in \nbusiness. \nIf you have any questions about working with Michael, please do not hesitate to call me. \nThank you."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt_19522
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "6/7/2017 12:03:23 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Blackstone anticipates that the program will have $40 billion in total equity commitments in a permanent \ncapital vehicle, including $20 billion to be raised from other investors,\" Blackstone said in a statement \nannouncing the planned launch of the investment fund. \"The MOU is non-binding and the parties will continue \ntheir negotiation to agree definitive documentation.\" \nBrookings Institution Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel was even less charitable. \"There is no deal. It's fake news,\" he \nwrote in a scathing piece on the Brookings website. \"I've spoken to contacts in the defense business and on the \nHill, and all of them say the same thing: there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many \nare offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday.\" \nIt could be years before anyone knows for sure whether the preliminary agreements announced in Saudi Arabia \nhave become real deals worth hundreds of billions, or whether the announcements were the kind of hyperbole \nTrump perfected during his time in the business world."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt_19535
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 12:32:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "read the times interview. I would think about pointing to the stormy daniels. denial by trump his staff and\naides. would it have made sense to go back to them? no would they admit no did they admit no , did they\nobfuscate yes. did they deny , yes so checking with the subject when you have to goods only confuses the\n\nreader ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt_19538
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt
subject: Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Fiszel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a \nhuge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt_19539
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "~~ ff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in\nnew york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["~~ ff"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["iii"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiaid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["es"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/21/2017 7:23:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you\nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt_19540
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Meet?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg — \nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major \ncandidates for President. \nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey \nEpstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it's current status, and any information that \ncould help explain Mr. Epstein's dealings and interactions with both men. \nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at \nyour earliest convenience. \nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet. \nMany thanks, \nMatthew"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 1:54:27 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt_19545
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the \nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its \ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it. \nNow remember \nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 9:26:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was that circa 11?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt_19546
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt
subject: Greetings from Japan
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:18:08 AM", "subject": "Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey,\nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.\n\n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big bitcoiner)\nas FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And of course,\nThiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where your head is at\non this matter.\n\n- Last week, | presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most interesting\nthing | came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to be spent only\nin the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An example of something\nthat could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree to donate your money to\n\ncharity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to release your funds from that\nagreement until they use their funds not for charity.\n\n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on\nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to\nthe technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that\neven putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge\nfund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-valued. |\nmade sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it will be interesting to\nsee the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front.\n\nBest,\n\nJeremy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt_19554
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt
subject:
  Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF
  EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:01:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt_19555
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 2:43:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I am seeing MMM a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall\nenough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The white House\nFellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt_19568
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt
subject: Re: bad
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:27 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be\nbeginning of the end of him...\n\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 10:23:07 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "im told people think it is done on purpose so he does not win"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt_19574
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:59:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "should have been done months ago too old!! ! !"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt_19575
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 8:09:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey, \nwas prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I'm so disgusted by the outrage over \n\"grab them by the pussy\" that I may give him my sympathy vote. \nI'm sure Bill c said things, too."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt_19586
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:53:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <P", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in\ntreasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as\nsome are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems\nto have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making\nso much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt_19588
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt
subject: Re: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump's 45 years in business were full of his shady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even juicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's B-level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money launderers. What's more, Trump's own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain billionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle schemes. Practically speaking, you couldn't miss him, as the Mueller investigation appeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal involving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach, Florida for $30 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and Trump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade, with Epstein often counseling Trump on his chaotic financial affairs. Epstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues involved with moving a swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the house, an incredulous Epstein saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for the property, buying it through an entity called Trump Properties LLC, financed by Deutsche Bank. Trump, Epstein knew, had been renting his name, telling Epstein he ought to do the same—that is, for an ample fee, Trump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate transaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump's basic business model of licensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein, suspecting that the real owner was a Russian oligarch, who Trump knew, Dmitry Rybolovlev—part of the close Putin circle of government-aligned industrialists in Russia—threatened to expose the deal, then getting extensive scrutiny in Florida papers. The fight became all the more bitter when, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to Trump, who often saw Epstein at his current Palm Beach house, Epstein was visited almost every day, and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy endings—girls recruited from local restaurants, strip clubs, and, also, Trump's Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the two friends increased over the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by local Palm Beach police. Epstein's legal problems vastly escalated as the house, with only minor improvements, was bought for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. That is, Trump had either miraculously earned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or Rybolovlev, or someone such as Rybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner unknown—$96 million, thereby providing a clean payment of $55 million to someone. Ryboloyley might have, in effect, paid himself for the house, thereby cleansing the money. Epstein, on his part, would spend 12 months in jail on a prostitution charge.\n\nAfter the election, when Bannon was introduced to Epstein, Bannon told him, \"You were the one person I was truly afraid of coming forward during the campaign.\"\n\n\"And rightly so,\" said Epstein."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:11:28 PM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Needs edit but ... ie 36! M Ryboloev not known in 05 , Talk later"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt_19589
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 22, 2018 15:38", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you'll have to spend time, europe by remote doesn't work Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come , stay 8 -10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage?.?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\nHow do I do that???\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- An Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\nOfficially in Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:58:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "011-331-441-70210. In 2 hrs"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028602.txt_19598
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028602.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....Ahhhhmmmm....first reaction is déja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know | am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt_19601
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- | apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "\" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer\" Hmmmmm. I have to be\ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer\nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on\nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were\nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the\nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.\n\nThanks,\n\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"Alan M. Dershowitz\" Fr Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr. iE - Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- | apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt_19606
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents I. who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of adinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as aninsurance co. --_ ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help ;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:48:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Re Boies, Voila. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html.\nUnclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt_19609
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\nNeed your advice.\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion\ndollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government\npromissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special\npurpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company\ncan only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount\nlent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the\nfinance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a\nlarge amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable\nabout this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. Iam very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading\npolitician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for\npresidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\n\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed"], "timestamp": "Jan 27, 2013, at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this from a fraud web site, your mimister will get upset that you dont want to at least try, what do we have to\nlose , always the pitch. THe following from the fraud site. --The essential fact in all advance-fee fraud\noperations is that the promised money transfer never happens—because the money does not exist. The\nperpetrators rely on the fact that, by the time the victim realizes this (often only after being confronted by a third\nparty who has noticed the transactions or conversation and recognized the scam), the victim may have sent\nthousands of dollars of their own money, and sometimes thousands or millions more that has been borrowed or\nstolen, to the scammer via an untraceable and/or irreversible means such as wire transfer.7! Stay\n\naway, however if you want to embarass your possible opponent , you might set it up so that he looks like a\nfool, ask for amemo of why he thinks you should agree , have it include as many detials as possible, so that\nwhen you prove its a fraud,, you will make him look very silly as opposed to his saying , you missed an\nopportunity, anyway,, glad you are well"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/27/2013 4:33:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you. You are my savior. I will do exactly what you said."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt_19612
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about\nEf Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because | was in your visitors list but somers and\nMargo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off | have never been in a big book before and | think it would\nhave been great and they never even asked me | told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful jf"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth ofthe claims. — unvierstiy of\nvirgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape\naccusation no penaltiy etc. mineis ripe with same"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there, If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022820.txt_19615
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022820.txt
subject: Re: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "13 August 2018 at 14:52", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "If you still want, send the questions. I would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my option to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Saturday, August 11, 2018 12:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Hello Martin,\n\nThank you for getting back to me. We would be looking for on record comments or a \"no comment\" to our questions. But I am certainly happy to have an off record conversation with yourself as well. Perhaps we could set up a time to chat briefly off record on Monday before I send you our questions for Mr Epstein?\n\nKind regards,\nMatt"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11 August 2018 at 11:08", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Mr Williams, I am in receipt of your emails to Jackie Percyzk. If you first agree that any communications between you and me are off the record, I would be agreeable to receiving your questions or a clip of the episode that relates to Mr Epstein. Thanks."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023280.txt_19617
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023280.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella PT"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM", "subject": null, "body": "that was it. ada was at the bank but reviewing docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush ( abel and\ncain)\nbooks as they were mystersiously called was being kept soley by eileen, with little or no input ,correction\nor advice from tom. herarely if ever asked questions. expenses ie airplane was done in house apollo.\n(1031 exchange blown etc) at this time\nas I recall you got quite annoyed, and agressive and initiated the\" talking out of the both sides of your\nmouth \" tiddy, when i suggested that the level of their competence left much to be desired. ( ralph lerner's\ncame later ) .response - eileen ran the desk, tom is a partner, ralph wrote the book etc\n\nre tax there was almost no oversight of income, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise etc . IRS\nSEC GAMING NYS. real estate, valuations ( many )tax _filings- disclosures, etc. re grats trusts defect\ntrusts, llcs corps , trustees , partnerships. foreign corps. 100 bank accounts. gift taxes, , loans, notes.\npayables. expenses. . , insurance.( life , art, split dollar), cashflows, operating biz, , investments,\ncontingent liabilitiites.( funds , miami ) , commitments dividends, BRH TRA, shareholder agreements,\nbank loan agreements. wills, construction, , contracts planning permits etc..employ rules. checking\naccount reconciliations, crediti cards. jewelry , cost basis ,( art stock etc.) foundations regs , brokerage\naccts, old stock certificates. stock options,( environmental solutions still not done !). estate tax\ncalcualtion firedrill, ( note ,basis etc ) low basis , step ups , however withno accounting system, no\nreveiw of boat expenses plane expenses etc. . many outside counsel with litle or no coordination.\nPaul Weisss , Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse , Reich, withers bergman, Empire, , akin\ngump, bbd seidman, Wendy , Apollo in house .\nlumber, knowledge universe, ennvironmental, solutions 12 mii in stock, . on and on\nthe priority list that you asked me to prepare for brad and you in dec , unfortunatlleyso far , little change\nie no accounting system that ties, no, brokerage accounts though strongly suggested , jpm db, gs, april\nof 2014 . IT antiquated\ndagastino hired , no inut from me, julie, temps, paralegals miriam . etc.\nstill need new accounting system - on line banking . staff hires. ( seprate from samantha two years out of\nschool ). audit system, . ?? john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? . i strongly suggest workers at the highest\nlevel of competence. two senior accountants. not managers workers who will get into the weeds. partn\nexpertise, , replace ava, get heather help. a new person legal , new IT,system and person, way way\noverdue, new receptionist, bill opener, ability to oeversee\nin house, boat plane review household ( 12million ) review, filings- partnerhip accounting,- familitarity\nwith grats, trusts etc . audit system put in place. that should be the easy part. then strategy to deal with :\nAs new facts on the ground develop , phaidon debra, children meeetings, ? stock sale sale of art, , apt(\nlarge gain ), 1031 trade in , plane depreciation, boat sale. construction , brad will oversee brokerage and\ninvestment, ?? pe. real es, . publishing, grats, tra, brh ( death). foundation , museum, tax proejctions cash\nflow projections, cooridnation with tax from apollo. etc\n\n1.I believe Ihave heard you , but i wanted to make certain that I have understood\n\nThough after much discussion ,- much! you were adamant that i receive my fee only at the very END of\nmy work, oct 15 _, this was a long discussion but you felt very strongly at the time . you now feel that as it\nwas a very large sum of money . some of my time this year should be spent on your recent concept of\n\"after care\". - and that after care should be for free . I have continued to pay others as well.\n\nI have asked and you have previously said you would lay out for me what you thought was encompassed\nby the concept. that was end of january Training brad?? who was your choice . not mine ,by a long\nshot. only brought on in january? ? hundreds of hours spent . eileen debrief? 2. boat. plane household"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt_19623
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "000 \nare we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed1111>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a \nnew school.. \nif you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday \nthnx again"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<anasalrasheed>"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 1:29:54 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029246.txt_19626
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029246.txt
subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMay I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your\nadvice about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for\nPoetry in America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the\nbottom a message just for you....\n\n-Lisa\n\nThat you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose\nsupport— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to\nrealize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to\nproduce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of\nhumanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and\ninformal, online and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to\nbegin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Do you know Chomsky , he Is with me"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff <3>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 2, 2015, at 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "did you want to send the below to Lisa? (or have me ask her?)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 5:58:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'd like to speak to her"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt_19627
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:36:16 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:24 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt_19628
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) \nwould like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. \nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good? \nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes happy to do in person"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie? \nI'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Scheduled. Would you have 30 min - 1 h before/after. Will tell you some more ideas about your interviews and \nscience support"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 5:07:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023294.txt_19635
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023294.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spin iii iii"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:45 AM", "subject": null, "body": "okay, its time for you to decide how you would like to move forward. ( fyi get your money from the\n1031 . the screw up is only one of many,) If you decide to move foward on decanting. phaidon, note basis\nestate update , each requires many carefully orchestrated detailed steps. and precision . there are hundreds of\nmillions in saving if done correctly and a huge mess if not. If you want me and my colleagues to do it ,\noversee it paper it and guide it, you should tell me. It is a big undertaking . If not , ok .. Brad and your crew\ncan do it. I will have no real further involvement apart from confirming the outcome of my proposed\nstructure, I will not risk the admonition of- they thought you said, they thought you meant, they understood it\nto be. but they said you said, (ie,I asked at our meeting that accounting be done properly for bens house ,\nwhat came back was ada thought that I meant that we needed to go back to the 97 trust and give him a full third\nparty accounting of where his money had gone??!! I kid you not). I dont think brad should talk to jane heller\nwithout a fully fleshed out plan in place and even then it should be you."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin", "Joe Avantario Po Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:59 AM", "subject": null, "body": "lets calculate the exact payoff amount for the leon note as of nov30,DECI1 , dec31. 1) does art space get\nfolded in to phaidon. . middle cos disolved.? 2 collapse topco etc\nopen bank accounts for apoo\ninterest will be approx 50k per day . look at deduction.\n\nnote payoff docs- notaries . new docs. releases? , accountings? disclosures? ( gaming ? ) art partnership .\nrenew. will? repaper lease guarantees? macfarlanes. ? do we pay down 10m. of plane. ? proposal for airplane\n, 91,135. exec, jet. .? remove debra. from plane?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:00 AM", "subject": null, "body": "we should discuss e trust andj black trust. , brad buying phaidon. artspace folding ? plane/ boat. foundation."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel! ia"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:09 PM", "subject": null, "body": "we need to coordinate. brad bank, cannot be clumsy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1. brador richard. makes litte difference. 2. gagosian . no written contract??!! fishy to me - who transfers\n100 million dollars overseas without a contract ,- dont want you pulled into ascandal. careful especially as\nhe is on the tax dept radar,. 3. I would like you to delineate what you would like me todo - the more\nspecificity the better.- I think it important to avoid any misunderstandings as to each of our obligations and\nresponsbilities. I will always give you my best advice. I have made my views re ada and the office clear . no\nhedging. . THEY should go. no hesitation . no zeus, your choice obviously. good news - I will not bring it up\nagain. moving forward- These transactions will require a great deal of manpower over the next\nholiday month, every document needs minute review. . I would like to fix our fee agreement , in detail no\nlater than this weekend . ie amounts , dates paid . entities paid. any concept you may have of\" after care\"? all\non the table. .other questions such as how much to leave your children ,in what form, has no right answer. but\nyou and I can dialougue as long as you like about issues of judgement. it is out of o friendship. not biz. ( bill\nhellman as a trustee? ) . we can talk about that during walks etc. I would like for you and I to go back to"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt_19637
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt
subject: Re: A few questions just in case please?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 12:59:34 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Call"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, December 15, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Thank you! Was amazing! The best family dinner ever. Louis said they LOVED me! Thu both texted him afterwards saying that:)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 14, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to know. ? is obama good for the country, .? israel? . if you could live one day of your lives over again, what would it be?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025878.txt_19641
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025878.txt
subject: Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [Jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 1:34:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\n\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt_19642
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt
subject: Re: IMPORTANT
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Steven Gaydos"], "timestamp": "3/30/2019 4:23:32 AM", "subject": "Re: IMPORTANT", "body": "THE LAST LAUGH\n\nSarah Silverman on Al Franken, Louis C.K., Losing Her Hulu Show and More\n\nIn the premiere episode of ‘The Last Laugh’ podcast, Sarah Silverman speaks out for the first time about her Hulu show’s cancelation and goes to bat for her friend Al Franken.\n\nMatt Wilstein\n\n03.26.19 4:12 AM ET\n\nWearing a rainbow-striped hoodie and a “Beer Nuts” baseball cap, Sarah Silverman strode into our Burbank recording studio ready to talk.\n\nIt had been just a few weeks since Hulu had unceremoniously canceled her weekly show J Love You, America and the comedian’s emotions were still a bit raw. But her unflappable sense of humor was fully intact as she recounted to me how she found out the bad news and ended up revealing more than ever before about how the streaming service treated her over the past year.\n\nDuring our long conversation for the first-ever episode of my new podcast The Last Laugh, Silverman also spoke frankly about what it has been like to see her friend Al Franken accused of alleged sexual"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022834.txt_19644
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022834.txt
subject: thoughts?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mortimer Zuckerman"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 9:37 AM", "subject": "thoughts?", "body": "Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never\nquestioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced. Marie never contacted her. I though it right as a friend to\nprotect her name. however during the entire lM time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled\nwith me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers\nMm She never saw anything that | She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the\n\nhouse. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that\nwould call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a\nserious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 -\n24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on\nthe island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the\nisland. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring\ntheir friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (\nno sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for\nunderage, that is crazy,..8. mill answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage\n\npeople , men women, aged up to 60."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt_19645
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt
subject: Re: Friday POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:22:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\nBoston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI.\nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are:\nWhite Plains\nTeterboro\nOrlando\nDulles\nOrlando\nFortlauderdale\n\nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required\nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full.\n\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12, time TBD (likely PM)\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15, time TBD (likely PM)\nShould I request parking at Boca?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019060.txt_19653
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019060.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 12/06/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Albuquerque", "Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 12/06/2006", "body": "In addition to the home in Palm Beach, Epstein also maintains a residence in the U.S. Virgin Islands, New York and New Mexico.\n\nTo date, the PBCRA continues. to develop witnesses and victims from across the United States. Due to the media coverage, unknown status of the state investigation, vulnerability of the young female victims, and political influences, the AUSAs and Case Agents have a target date of January 2007 for indictment.\n\nBased on the ongoing criminal investigation, the PBCRA is requesting the assistance in establishing Epstein's criminal activity utilizing interstate commerce and the travel in interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct and prostitution. Prior to conducting captioned leads, it is requested that the lead agent(s) contact SA FBI Miami, West Palm RA, or SA or investigative direction and questions."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026342.txt_19656
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026342.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff [is", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:24:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt_19661
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt
subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "From:", "recipients": ["To:", "Cc: Ainbanklaw Info; Denyse Sabagh;", "| Michael Baxter;", "Re, Patrick M. Regan; Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid;", "Ellen Kerns;"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton.\n\nOn Saturday, July 1, 2017, 12:06:29 PM EDT, [i yrote:\n\nRich Beckler,\nKen Adams,\n\nDo you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr.\nBeckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from\nmy being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was\non the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance\nand association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see\nbelow); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-\nfiled case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being\ntracked."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reic aa", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 5:57:07 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Too down...give me another day\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt_19662
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt
subject: Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 3:19:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Morgan Stanley <ms-wmir@morganstanley.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 29, 2019 at 6:35:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025893.txt_19664
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025893.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2015, at 22:05", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "thought you might find amusing"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Aug 10, 2015, at 01:51", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI really find it amusing. I don't agree with everything he says. But it is fascinating. BB is making \"historic mistakes\"(as he likes to blame others) both vis-a-vis Obama as well as in regard to the American Jewry. And causes a direct damage to IL.\n\nNoam is so sharp and focused. Really impressive.\n\nI did not fully understand how the fallacy he sees in the attitude to the Ants example is related to Big Data illusions. An area (deep learning) I spent some time recently trying to better penetrate.\n\nBtw, the series of cubic differences should look 7,19,37,61 (not 21).\n\nWe greatly enjoyed staying in 62nd.\n\nWe plan to be back in the last week of Aug. for several weeks (having some speeches to make)\n\nwill you still be in NM?\n\nIf positive we might come over for few days.\n\nPl let us know.\n\nBest\n\nFrom Nili as well.\n\nRegards\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Aug 9, 2015 10:54:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\n66th I meant.\n\nThx again. It was really great.\nBest\n\nEB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023067.txt_19671
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023067.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["1111.1.1", "Nick Pyke", "Liz Hartley"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names________________and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri Oct 18 2013 at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad", "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "Darren Indyke", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:30:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031803.txt_19673
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031803.txt
subject:
  Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN <_________________>", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 2:21 AM", "subject": "Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today.\n\nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by wealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to testify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil lawsuit against the registered sex offender.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-civil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims\n\nExplore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["DAVID SCHOEN"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 9:57:14 AM", "subject": "Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "no worry how are you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026430.txt_19684
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026430.txt
subject: so there is no misunderstanding
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella SE"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 12:27:23 AM", "subject": "so there is no misunderstanding", "body": "Ihave told the brads and barry,- Iam done. its not a negotiation , out !!- fyi given my carlyn joslin\n\ncastrucci, admonishments,- though my involvement in those - in one instance only gave a name - in\n\nanother only given an MMM dictated choice btween two 250k preparers. and for castrucci, I actually sent\n\nemails that i take no responsiblity for his being hired. - however you felt strongly that I should be saddled\n\nwith their outcomes .even with brad wechsler , 1 again said two months in, Leon, he doesnt get it. I tell you\n\nthis so that you will understand that I will not interview, recommend or vet any new hire.\n\nA story - In 1993 trump and I had a friend that kept telling his pilots how to fly , and when to fly , he couldnt\n\nhelp himself from hiring morons as co pilots, and maintenance people based on cheapest rates. Donald and I\n\ntried and tried to talk some sense into him, to no avail. Donald and I were in aspen, sitting at little\n\nnells. when the friends plane crashed into the side of aspen mountain , klliing him and all on board,- Trump\n\nlooked at me and said without a blink , I guess NOW he wishes he would have listened to us.- a metaphor for\n\nyour office.. . had we not waited to the very last hour having had a six month window and tens of\n\nunasnwered text and emails re decisions needed including the 1031. you would have saved way more than\n\nyou often feel obliged to argue about. . silly buti reallize you are stressed.\n\nBarry will need to sit with brad for months, to absorb all the co's , structures. cash flow, financial statments\n\netc. I will present barry my thoughts on the overall redo , it will be the exact same email that i presented to\n\nyou and brad two years.ago . accurate numbers first. and foremost. . (last week gaming report stil\n\nfunky). IT ete I pointed out some of the more glaring errors to barry to give him a flavor of what is to come.\n\nTuesday if you like we should discuss Giacometti , and pesner . difficult to finesse him if they are\n\nfiling documents that you won't. these ridiculous conversations with tons of people on the phone , removes\n\nany claim you might have to not be considered a WILLFUL NON-FILER . ( after youve been told by attnys\n\nand pwe that you should file in writing , you have NO choice ) ... worst possible result - including\n\nserious penalties up the kazoo."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt_19693
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt
subject: Re: Off the record trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:44:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "WOW"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["a <r"], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard."}, {"sender": "iy <r", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please check every false allegation with me before repeating to others."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018045.txt_19695
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018045.txt
subject: Re: List of Events from Siegel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "9/10/2010 4:01:03 PM", "subject": "Re: List of Events from Siegel", "body": "I only wanted what peggy was hositng"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 10, 2010 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: List of Events from Siegel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Margaux Rogers", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 10, 2010 11:53 AM", "subject": "Calendar of Major Events, Openings, and Fundraisers", "body": "Saturday, September 11, 2010\n\nKids Fashion Week\n\nPetite Parade Opening Day. Childrens fashion shows. (Continues through September 13.). Metropolitan Pavilion. New York. Contact: Sale Stojanovic. sale@funkshion.com. (305) 673-2756.\n\nEvent address: 125 West 18th St., New York. Event web address:www.kidsfashionweekny.com.\nTags: Children Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail Fashion Event Fashion Show.\n\nCouture Fashion Week\n\nCouture Show. 8:00 am. Couture fashion show, cocktails, and after party. Benefiting the NYC Affiliate of Susan G. Komen For the Cure. Elegant chic. Honoring Dara Richardson-Heron. Tickets from $75.00. Waldorf=Astoria. New York. Contact: Andres Aquino. newyorkfashionshows@yahoo.com. (917) 749-8421.\n\nWaldorf=Astoria: Grand Ballroom. Event address: 301 Park Avenue, New York. Sponsored by Couture Fashion Week. Fax: (212) 202-4604. Event web address:www.couturefashionweek.com/susankomennyc.htm.\n\nTags: After party Cocktail party Fashion Show Fundraiser Arts Patron Collector Exclusive Mix Food and Wine Lover Industry Fashion Social Patron Health Cancer Medical Research.\n\nNew York City - Office of the Mayor\n\nOfficial Memorial Ceremony and Remebrance 2010. 8:46am. Zuccotti Park. New York. (212) 442-8953.\nEvent address: Liberty Street between Broadway and Church Streets, New York.\n\nTags: Reception Children Family Industry Diplomatic Industry Government Relations Industry Media Industry Military Industry Political/Government Social Patron Civic."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025139.txt_19696
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025139.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/24/2018 6:11:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey\n\nfinally landed\n\nvery unpleasant journey\n\nyou had nothing to do with how Chapman acted and i apologise for suggesting it might be otherwise\nit was entirely against me, partly motivated by a spiteful ex-friend\n\nconsulted two lawyers that Gordon recommended but they were very discouraging\n\nthe basic problem is simple—i am going against a strong national trend—well-known man after well-known man is being brought low for alleged his\nmisbehaviour toward women—in some case well-deserved prison time (Cosby and perhaps Weinstein) in many other cases, simply being run out of\ninstitutions—exactly my fate\n\nfurthermore in he say/she say confrontations the evidence has shifted—in University settings at least—from 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to a\n‘preponderance of evidence' to 'more positive than negative'\n\nthe loss is huge, on the order of a half million to a million dollars, meant to keep me alive (they were going to offer a five-year contract) while i let\nmy ‘inheritance’ be spent on children and grandchildren while also growing\n\ni have no choice but to work\n\ni will get my revised Wild Life to an agent later this week—have added 5 new chapters and a few sections—much stronger for the inclusion of my\nmajor scientific work—1. social theory based on natural selection and 2. selfish genetic elements selected within organisms\n\nthen i have Honour Killings set to roll, as well as another one\n\nhope you are thriving—and also hope Trump will stop this international trade nonsense—a lose/lose war—especially as it affects the stock market or\nso it seems to me\n\nbest wishes\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019074.txt_19710
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019074.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 01/25/2007
messages:
  [{"sender": "@..", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "01/25/2007", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 01/25/2007", "body": "LEAD (s):\nSet Lead 1: (Info)\nMIAMI\nAT MIAMI\n\nThird Party Draft shall\nto pay expenses associated with the captioned case.\n\n+4"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026356.txt_19714
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026356.txt
subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 7:44:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "ne"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt_19724
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt
subject: Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 1:28:18 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "This guy black might be your lawyer and even a friend; but i have to say it seems to me he is much more about \nhimself than his clients. \nHe made a comment in a newspaper about a case of mine not long ago and he had no idea what he was talking \nabout; he should have been embarrassed. When i asked a reporter from one if the leading newspapers why the \nother paper had run his opinion about my casr when he knows nothing about it, she said his p.r. people email \nand others regularly with comments on all sorts if cases just hoping to get black's name in the paper in some \npseudo authoritative role. Pretty weak. \nGood luck, David"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 12, 2016", "subject": "Obama team nixed fundraiser by  attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article: \nOne of America's top defense attorneys was deemed too controversial to host an event for President Obama, \naccording to newly surfaced emails, mainly because of one particular client — a jet-setting billionaire accused of \ntrafficking underage girls, who also happens to be close friends with Bill Clinton. \nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/12/obama-team-nixed-fundraiser-by-attorney-for-sex-offender-pal-\nbill-clinton-emails-show.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022272.txt_19725
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022272.txt
subject: Re: Oil options
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nav Gupta", "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/— ME", "Vinit Sahni/d ii!"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust got off the phone with Vinit.\nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated I'd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and out.\n\nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given the 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is raised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show Merkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from Russia. Germany gets 30%.\n\nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each other past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused on European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up."}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time we'll be much quicker.\nNav Gupta"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "Iam ona plane to and from tokyo tomorrow next 2-3 days, if u need something otherwise available 24/7 on\n\nVinit Sahni"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Vin Shi"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 3:39:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "thanks 4 hours for a quote ina normally fast moving market ? confirms my voiced concerns"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt_19730
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2018 7:17:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes completely forgot about it\nI m flying in Friday night\nWould Saturday 11:00 be good for you?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8 Nov 2018, at 19:39", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when are you arriving, traffic will be crazy. do to celebratons and trump"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt_19732
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard: \nWe're working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send \nmy questions to you tonight, so you'd have them first thing tomorrow. \n\nWould you like to comment on the following:\n\n1. You've said that the women pressing suits against Mr. Epstein \"have lied repeatedly, and in \nno way shape or form were they victims. They were at his place freely and voluntarily. And one \nof them showed Epstein a fake ID.\" What do you have to say now that Mr. Epstein has \nadmitted in his federal plea bargain that he did conspire to entice minors to engage in \nprostitution? Accepting that these women came voluntarily, isn't Mr Epstein still guilty of \nstatutory rape? \n\n2. Brad Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the women, recently served a \nSubpoena to Testify at a Deposition on Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine \nMaxwell. The Subpoena asks that Maxwell produce \"a list of all girls\" that visited \nJeffrey Epstein's homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan, or flew on his \nplanes. Edwards said in an interview that Maxwell was \"second-in-command of \nEpstein's criminal enterprise.\" He added, \"She was on Epstein's plane, transporting girls \nfor the purpose of having sex with other people. She kept a computer database of hundreds of \ngirls and oversaw the schedule of girls who came to Epstein's homes.\" \n\n3. A suit filed last May by \"Jane Doe 102\" against Epstein alleges that, after recruiting her as a 15-\nyear-old girl to give Epstein massages, Maxwell and Epstein took part in \"sexually assaulting, \nbattering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff.\" \n\n4. The same suit alleges that Epstein \"lured\" the girl \"every day for next two weeks\" to his \nhouse. The suit claims that she eventually became a \"sex slave\" to Epstein, traveling with him \naround the world. \"In all of these locations, she was required to engage in sex acts with him and \nother women - including other minors.\" \n\n5. Did Jane Doe 102 — who now lives in Australia — go on the 2002 trip where \nPresident Clinton flew on Mr. Epstein's Boeing 727? \n\n6. \"Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when defendant [Jane Doe 102] knew \nthat the plaintiff was approximately 15, 16 and 17 years old and, after years of daily sexual \nexploitation continued into her adulthood ... until she fled at age 19,\" \n\n7. When Maxwell and Epstein celebrated Jane Doe 102's 16th birthday with her, Epstein joked that \nhe would have to \"trade her in\" because she was getting too old for him. \n\n8. Not only was Jane Doe 102 required to satisfy Epstein's \"every sexual whim,\" but she also was \nexploited by Epstein's adult male peers. They included \"royalty, politicians, academicians, \nbusinessmen and others in various locations around the world.\" \n\n9. The Palm Beach Post and lawyers representing Epstein's alleged victims have called his federal \nnon-prosecution agreement a \"secret,\" \"backroom,\" \"sweetheart\" deal, noting that none of his \nalleged victims was consulted. Several critics have claimed Epstein \"bought\" the agreement, using \npolitically-connected lawyers. Would he like to comment? \n\n10. Is Epstein cooperating with federal suit against Bear Steams hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi \nand Matthew Tannin? Willhetestifyintheircases? \n\n11. Mr Epstein was deposed on this week, on Thursday. Is it true that he answered almost every \nquestion by invoking his FifthAmendmentrights? \n\n12. Defense attorney Brad Evans has filed a motion to freeze Mr Epstein's assets. Has Mr. \nEpstein moved his money from the US offshore or abroad, or does he intend to, in order to \nprotect his assets from possible damage claims? \n\n13. What did Mr. Epstein do during his work release program while serving time. Reports have \nsaid he engaged in \"scientific research.\" If so, what was he researching? \n\n14. Has Mr. Epstein returned to pursuing his investment business? Is Mr Epstein still on \nprobation? \n\n15. Is Mr. Epsteinpermittedto leave FloridaortheUnited States? Do authoritiesholdhis \npassport? \n\nYou can reach me via e-mail or at or . We close our column at 3 \npm on Friday but can add comments as late as 3 pm on Saturday. Many thanks.\n\nGeorge"}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren: \nI hope you are well. \nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I'm forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see \nfit. \nMany thanks,\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:43:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029291.txt_19734
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029291.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/6/2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how does it feel to have the president of the united states. at camp david. focus on you..!."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I feel he truly must be off his rocker. Could there be a strategy here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/6/2018 9:20:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It looks to me as you might have driven him over the edge. DJT: 'Ido things proper !!/\" im really, like .\nsmart.!! sounds like elizas father- donald dolittle... or dopey donald or demented donald. as I told you his\nstatement from camp david was laced with \"he has made billions and billions of dollars. he is\n\nreportedly petrified that his bluff will be called. . His 100 million dollar plane he said be bought from paul\nallen , is really a 1991 boeing 757 previously used by a mexican airline. repainted . His- ladder capital\nfinance llc, - ladder capital 1 finance Ilc , deutsche bank trust co americas . chicago unit acquistion .( it\n\nsays \"springing loan” over 50m -I nevereven heard oftheterm . as part of june 17 disclosure form he\nowes each more than 50 m apiece. but of course, not disclosed just -how much more. . declared the revenue\nof his real estate as INCOME without deducting expenses or taxes. all a sham"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026123.txt_19736
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026123.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick, Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused. Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur # I will call u"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:39:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "U know he lies only when his month is moving!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt_19745
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt
subject: Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2018 2:00:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": "Thx 3pm Wednesday to Teterboro confirmed,,\nFriday Trump arrives in PBI, I’ll confirm time,\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2018, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025105.txt_19750
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025105.txt
subject: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\n\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\n\nWarm regards,\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 6:28:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for ~10 days.\n\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\nWhen good to meet?\n\nRobert"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt_19751
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt
subject: Re: 7626
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 24 June 2016", "subject": "Re: 7626", "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nWhat the f... Does going to open lk down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2016, at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: 7626", "body": "5616557625"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:49 AM", "subject": "Re: 7626", "body": "Is this the right # says its disconnected"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:51:32 AM", "subject": "Re: 7626", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029285.txt_19754
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029285.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers [lsummers@harvard.edu]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\n\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "10/11/2017 3:15:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "he knows. , itis sooo crazy, and now reporting is quite inaccurate. but each reporter feels he needs to tell his\nversion, Im in paris if you want to chat"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029204.txt_19755
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029204.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth.\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-fortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "if you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 27, 2014", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Can you talk now?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:58:54 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Please use my alternative address\no avoid email auto responder"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt_19756
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2017 12:38:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "The inauguration was amazing! And in one day, Trump got more fat women walking than Michelle did in 8 years L."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032503.txt_19771
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032503.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 7:54:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is It possible for you to pass by Strasbourg, it would be great. I really need to understand more about Trump \nand what's going on in the American society."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "fre. 17. feb. 2017 kl. 21.27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im in paris until thurs? you?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028762.txt_19772
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028762.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:59:08 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Forgot to ask you — pls have someone from your office confirm 2 tickets for LifeBall for you.\n\nAlso provide them with a name of the girl that you are talking.\n\nOne the pdf that | sent you there is a contact info and refer to the email below (Magdalena Schuster\n[mailto;\n\nAnd she is holding them for you.\nPlease do it asap as these are hard to get."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt_19778
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. He actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up. Did you ever speak to him?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:54:43 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt_19780
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fair ..and you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2017 9:11:37 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Where?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt_19787
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt
subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:58:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "“Privileged - Redacted\n\ni !\nA at TP a ea a eee eee Rear erReE eT ="}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt_19791
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjon JagIan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 8:42:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, terrible times. If Trump wins in US I'll settle on your island. Before that, I'll be in NY in September. Lot of things to talk about."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "tirsdag 28. juni 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you must be a very busy man\nhope to seee you soon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030806.txt_19794
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030806.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/29/2011 12:36:57 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Agree!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 29, 2011 1:35 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor, are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon \nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt_19795
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt
subject: Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra [deepak@chopra.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 1:25:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "Yes\nWill do"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 14, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "nice to see you, we should spend some time getting the app and board game right"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate from Deepak Chopra’s Tweet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032517.txt_19796
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032517.txt
subject: Masa...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:21:50 PM", "subject": "Masa...", "body": "Trying to get you in with Masa crowd. Some resistance though, due to all the headlines/controversy --\nas you might expect. I tell them about your relationship with Saudis/Gates/Trump crowd, but still \ndoubts. Working on it!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028776.txt_19797
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028776.txt
subject: Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe", "Cheikh Tidiane Sy", "Mohamed Seydou Diagne", "El Hadji Amadou Sall"], "timestamp": "Monday, February 29, 2016 6:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations!!! Can we share this with the press here?\nBest regards.\n\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-02-26 13:04 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Great news, the piece was published in The Hill this morning-\n\nhttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/international/270878-senegals-democratic-backslide\n\nWe can share this w Congress and State.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 26, 2016, at 6:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Excellent!!!"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-02-24 20:13 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We are working on getting the following article placed in the Hill or the Politico within the next week. As of now it looks like former Chairman of Armed Services, Congressman Ron Dellums, will be the author. Please keep highly confidential. Will keep you posted on if, when and where it gets published. Once it is published we can all circulate it highly. We believe that this article sets the tone for the advocacy we will be doing and having someone very prominent like Congressman Dellums will also be a great way to launch this campaign.\n\nCongressman Ronald Dellums is a thirteen term Member of the U.S. House of Representatives (D-CA) who served from 1971-1998. He also served as the 48th Mayor of Oakland from 2007-2011. Dellums served as the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and the House Committee on the District of Columbia. He also served on the Foreign Affairs Committee, the Post Office and Civil Service Committee, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and co-founded the Congressional Black Caucus.\n\nSenegal's Democratic Backslide"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030570.txt_19802
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030570.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley <a;"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 4 2011 10:51 AM", "subject": null, "body": "mary's great ,thanks.. I will call her again today. my suggestion for T is out of the box ( how unusual ).. 1. I\nstill think that the only really qualified person is Jamie. knowledge of system, ddreivatives. banking operations\nboth domestic and intl. . Personality issues are the key. ..AS that seems diofficult 2. I THink it would\nbehoove Obama to make Bill CLinton Treasury sec.. and move Hillary out. of state. , Bill will be able to\nexplain to the public and he world complex issues.. Unlike Jamie he could not craft them, but in todays internet\n\nworld the message and how itis delivered is as important.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028986.txt_19805
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028986.txt
subject: Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra <j", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:57 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind | thought I’d share this\nSee you at 3PM"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2016, at 5:43 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "iwill forward it. he asked if you would come back again. without the russian. to me it was a woody\nallen movie. you talking conciousness , his wife more concerned with the salad dressing, and the russian\ndeciding the future of syria. . | As you know I find ideas no matter how extreme , the root of possible\ninsight. so the other day I had viisitn the psychedelic crowd. one of them has opened a store on 1 st and the\nbowery called the alchemist kitchen. . How about we meet there , I want to see the store and you ride with\nme back uptown. lets say 230? Ihave left my schedule open after."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 9:52:40 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Yes\n\nThanks for forwarding it !\n\nIt was a fascinating evening !\n\nI've felt a kinship with Woody because he is tortured by existential dilemmas as am I .\n\nThe Russian was just being Russian- a socialist with right wing tastes . I actually liked him .\nThe wife was being a mother to Woody . I think he's needed that all his life .\n\nI will meet you at the Bowery at 230 PM\n\nSend me the address"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt_19814
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \"\n\n. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been\n\nmade by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to\nme . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger\nplace and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at\nthe beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would\nhave been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out, in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot... prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016691.txt_19816
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016691.txt
subject: ARCOM
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Page/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Kirk Blouin/PalmBeach@PalmBeach", "Tim Frank/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "06/26/2008 09:00 AM", "subject": "ARCOM", "body": "Kirk: We had our June monthly ARCOM meeting yesterday. You likely know that ARCOM is working with Mr. Trump to re-install a hedge on his North County Road property. I believe this case is now pending in front of Code Enforcement. In May, ARCOM approved a plan to replace the former hedge with silver buttonwood shrubbery, which would additionally be back-planted with silver buttonwood trees....the overall effect would be an eventual 20' high screen. The shrubs have been planted, but yesterday attorney Ray Royce asked for postponing the trees until the end of the Hurricane season. ARCOM said NO and directed the attorney and landscaper to get the trees in ASAP. Also, more shrubbery was required at the main entry (north side) to match the newly installed hedge on the south side.\n\nAs the meeting was ending, the Commissioners asked for one of two things. They asked that either 1) a quick written report from Code Enforcement be made available to them at their next meeting on July 23 (9:00 a.m.) about the enforcement status of the case, or 2) that someone from Code Enforcement attend their meeting to provide a verbal status report. Their patience is wearing thin with the whole hedge issue, and it has them naturally curious about what is happening with their counterparts on Code Enforcement.\n\nWould you or the appropriate representative from Code Enforcement be available on July 23? That would be my preference because follow-up questions almost always pop up. If not, can you provide me with a brief summary of your enforcement history and pending status? Thanks, JP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031646.txt_19817
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031646.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\n\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers | a s"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:05:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "22?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025918.txt_19818
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025918.txt
subject: Re: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Philip Katka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:22:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Epstein 2016!\n\n(Mark)"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka <q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie’s like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60’s and 70’s."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, | too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She’s shameless!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031120.txt_19820
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031120.txt
subject: Tom McMillen
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/22/2013 10:45:31 PM", "subject": "Tom McMillen", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nI saw Tom McMillen last night and he asked about you - said he lost touch. He's tight with the Obama's and is going to be\nan Ambassador - apparently any country he wants. So great! I'd LOVE to be an Ambassador and am going attempt to\nraise enough money on the next election cycle.\n\nHis info is: I hesitate to give him your info w/out ur permission...\n\nAm doing Aspen Institute Socrates Society program over President's weekend if you're in Aspen! Miss you!\nLove and Happiness, Gwendolyn\n\nPS. Have a conference call with Jessica Joffe tomorrow."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt_19823
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt
subject: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 8:26:59 AM", "subject": "You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "You should see this movie/documentary \nInside Job (2010) \nNYT Critics' PickThis movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York \nTimes. \nSony Pictures Classics \nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary \"Inside Job.\" \nWho Maimed the Economy, and How \nBy A. 0. SCOTT \n\"Inside Job,\" a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime \nwithout punishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The \nbetrayal of public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and \ndamaging than the adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than \nvillain. \nThe gist of this movie, which begins in a mood of calm reflection and grows angrier and more incredulous \nas it goes on, is unmistakably punitive. The density of information and the complexity of the subject \nmatter make \"Inside Job\" feel like a classroom lecture at times, but by the end Mr. Ferguson has summoned \nthe scourging moral force of a pulpit-shaking sermon. That he delivers it with rigor, restraint and good \nhumor makes his case all the more devastating. \nHe is hardly alone in making it. Numerous journalists have published books and articles retracing the \npaths that led the world economy to the precipice two years ago. The deregulation of the financial \nservices industry in the 1980s and '90s; the growing popularity of complex and risky derivatives; the \nreal estate bubble and the explosion of subprime lending — none of these developments were exactly \nsecret. On the contrary, they were celebrated as vindications of the power and wisdom of markets. \nAccordingly, Mr. Ferguson recycles choice moments of triumphalism, courtesy of Lawrence H. Summers, \nGeorge W. Bush, Alan Greenspan and various cable television ranters and squawkers. \nEven as stock indexes soared and profits swelled, there were always at least a few investors, economists \nand government officials who warned that the frenzied speculation was leading to the abyss. Some of these \nprophets without honor show up in front of Mr. Ferguson's camera, less to gloat than to present, once \nagain, the analyses that were dismissed and ignored by their peers for so long. \nDozens of interviews — along with news clips and arresting aerial shots of New York, Iceland and other \ndisaster areas — are folded into a clear and absorbing history, narrated by Matt Damon. The music (an \nopening song, \"Big Time,\" by Peter Gabriel, and a score by Alex Heffes) and the clean wide-screen \ncinematography provide an aesthetic polish that is welcome for its own sake and also important to the \nmovie's themes. The handsomely lighted and appointed interiors convey a sense of the rarefied, privileged \nworlds in which the Wall Street operators and their political enablers flourished, and the elegance of \nthe presentation also subliminally bolsters the film's authority. This is not a piece of ragged \nmuckraking or breathless advocacy. It rests its outrage on reason, research and careful argument. \nThe same was true of Mr. Ferguson's previous documentary, \"No End in Sight,\" which focused on \ncatastrophic policies carried out in Iraq by President George W. Bush's administration just after the \noverthrow of Saddam Hussein. But whereas that film concentrated on a narrow view of a complex subject — \nthe conduct of the war rather than the at least equally controversial rationale for fighting it — \"Inside \nJob\" offers a sweeping synthesis, going as far back as the Reagan administration and as far afield as \nIceland in its anatomy of the financial crisis. \nPerhaps unsurprisingly, many of the highest-profile players declined to be interviewed. Mr. Summers \nappears only in news footage, and none of his predecessors or successors as Treasury secretary — not \nRobert E. Rubin or Henry M. Paulson Jr. or Timothy F. Geithner — submit to Mr. Ferguson's questions. Nor \ndo any of the top executives at Goldman Sachs or the other big banks. Most of the interviewees are, at \nleast from the perspective of the filmmaker, friendly witnesses, adding fuel to the director's \ncomprehensive critique of the way business has been done in the United States and the other advanced \ncapitalist countries for the past two decades. \nBoth American political parties are indicted; \"Inside Job\" is not simply another belated settling of \naccounts with Mr. Bush and his advisers, though they are hardly ignored. The scaling back of government \noversight and the weakening of checks on speculative activity by banks began under Reagan and continued \nduring the Clinton administration. And with each administration the market in derivatives expanded, and \nalarms about the dangers of this type of investment were ignored. Raghuram Rajan, chief economist at the \nInternational Monetary Fund, presented a paper in 2005 warning of a \"catastrophic meltdown\" and was \nmocked as a \"Luddite\" by Mr. Summers. \nMeanwhile, some investment bankers — at Goldman Sachs in particular — were betting against the positions \nthey were pushing on their customers. An elaborate house of cards had been constructed in which bad \nconsumer loans were bundled into securities, which, were certified as sound by rating agencies paid by \nthe banks and then insured via credit-default swaps. One risky bet was stacked on top of another, and in \nretrospect the collapse of the whole edifice, along with the loss of jobs, homes, pensions and political \nconfidence, seems inevitable. \nHow did this happen? Mr. Ferguson is no conspiracy theorist; nor is he inclined toward structural or \nsystemic explanations. Markets are not like tectonic plates, shifting on their own. Visible hands write \nlaws and make deals, and in this case a combination of warped values and groupthink seems to have driven \nvery intelligent men (and they were mostly men) toward folly. In addition to business and government, Mr. \nFerguson aims his critique at academia, suggesting that the discipline of economics and more than a few \nprominent economists were corrupted by consulting fees, seats on boards of directors and membership in \nthe masters of the universe club. \nwhen he challenges some of these professors, in particular those who held positions of responsibility in \nthe white House or in the Federal Reserve, they are reduced to stammering obfuscation — markets are \ncomplicatedl Who could have predicted? I don't see any conflict of interest — and occasionally provoked \nto testiness. Mr. Ferguson, for his part, cannot always contain his incredulity or rein in his sarcasm. \noccasionally his voice pipes up from off camera, saying things like, \"You can't be serious!\" \nBut it is hard to imagine a movie more serious, and more urgent, than \"Inside Job.\" There are a few \navenues that might have been explored more thoroughly, in particular the effects of the crisis on \nordinary, non-wall-street-connected workers and homeowners. The end of the film raises a disturbing \nquestion, as Mr. Damon exhorts viewers to demand changes in the status quo so that the trends associated \nwith unchecked speculation of the kind that caused the last crisis — rising inequality, neglect of \nproductive capacity, endless cycles of boom and bust — might be reversed. \nThis call to arms makes you wonder why anger of the kind so eloquently expressed in \"Inside Job\" has been \nso inchoate. And through no fault of its own, the film may leave you dispirited as well as enraged. Its \nfate is likely to be that of other documentaries: praised in some quarters, nitpicked in others and \nshrugged off by those who need its message most. Which is a shame. \n\"Inside Job\" is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). Some drug and sex references and pervasive \nobscenity, though not the verbal kind."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033147.txt_19825
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033147.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 11:59:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "heads up that in michael wolfes book it said alan asked trump for a million dollars up front. . it also talks \nabout me an the palm beach house purchase"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026094.txt_19828
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026094.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 10:23:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt_19829
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 20, 2016, at 8:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "rest"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This is a stupid and exhausting trip. No more speeches."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "speak.?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 2:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am about to go on stage. The first part of my presentation is about Trump."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033153.txt_19834
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033153.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "drsra", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/11/2011 2:33:58 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "So, are you on his campaign committee and what part of the organizing are you responisble for? I know you are just dying to help."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026080.txt_19835
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026080.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 11:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will ask, get back to you tomorw"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 8:27:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\nKUNA: Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the Yemeni\ngovernment is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to Yemen as\nsoon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international pressures\nand defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace efforts.\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,\" he noted.\nThe Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-\nAhmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign\nminister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings.\n\"We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome you\nif you sign the agreement and not to waste time. But it appears that the revolutionaries are not ready to respond\nto this step,\" he said.\nAl Meahlafi said he visited Brussels for two-days of talks with the Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders,\nEuropean Commission officials and Members of the European Parliament to explain the situation in Yemen and\nseek support for the Yemeni government's peace efforts.\nHe said the Yemeni government seeks peace based on the three references, the Gulf initiative, the outputs of the\nnational dialogue, and the Security Council resolutions on Yemen, including resolution 2216.\nThe Yemeni foreign minister called on the EU to condemn the revolution and the Iranian interference in\nYemen, which is sending arms to the Houthi militias.\nHe also expressed his thanks to the EU for their humanitarian aid and for pledging the amount of 116 million\neuro (USD 127 mn) during the UN-sponsored donors conference on Yemen held recently in Geneva. (end)\nnk.mb"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031134.txt_19838
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031134.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:49:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is this the right # says its disconnected\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2016, at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "5616557625"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 24 June 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nWhat the f... Does going to open 1k down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025589.txt_19841
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025589.txt
subject: Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gordon Getty", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf", "body": "Friends and Family, \nHere's my latest on free growth theory. Tell me if I'm making any progress in my old intelligibility deficit. \nI'm also working on a new version without math."}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf", "body": "here is my latest and final comment on Peter Richerson's comments on Gordon's idea about Trump being a narcissistic psychopath—a view with which i firmly agree \ni have learned a lot by thinking through all of Peter's argumentation but i have not learned much that contradicts either my biases nor reality herself \nall best wishes"}, {"sender": "Alan Rogers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf", "body": "I haven't read whatever Pete wrote, but if I understand Bob correctly, \nPete must be talking about subfunctionalization: \nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subfunctionalization \nIf so, it's not a radical suggestion. It's thought to be the process that gave rise to all multi-gene families. Michael Lynch discusses it in his book, The Origin of Genome Architecture. \nAm I missing something? \nAlan"}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Alan Rogers", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Gordon Getty", "Oliver Goodenough", "Tim Kane", "Rob Hanson", "Paul Zak", "Bobby McCormick", "Terry Anderson", "Clive Crook", "Matt Ridley", "Gerry Ohrstrom", "Lee Silver", "Monika Gruter Cheney", "Dane Stangler", "iron Bailey", "Anna Dreber", "Anula Jayasuriya", "Iul Romer", "Mike Cagney Evan Smith", "Roger Edelen", "Bill Prezant", "John Mallen", "Halligan", "Marguerite Atkins", "Ditsa Pines", "David Darst", "president@usfca.edu", "Clair Brown", "Richerson, Peter J", "Ms. Yvette Robbins", "Alex.Family Pines", "Jim"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 5:06:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf", "body": "yes Alan i think you are \nyou are referring to duplication of a gene—there are many such genes including those produced by retrotransposons (as evidenced by lack of introns)—where a gene has two separate effects and there is an advantage to having a gene with each effect you will often prefer two genes to one, because of less interference in fitness effects \nPeter was talking about a gene with a single effect—sickling—and the other allele is the normal one—the heterozygote destroys malaria within red blood cells at trivial cost and there is no cost at all if malaria is not present—by contrast homozygous sickle individuals suffer lifetime effects \nPeter was trying to conjure up a heterozygote that propagated asexually but this requires a chiasma between neighbouring genes, a very rare event and hence it usually leads rapidly to mutational decay of one of the two copies, i.e. so-called pseudogenes, of which there are many in our genome \nin haste"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031652.txt_19849
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031652.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 1:09:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105.txt_19853
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105.txt
subject:
  Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 4:15:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "Cool"}, {"sender": "Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "VMohcbbi", "Nine", "Rucmmicr, Kathy (DC)", "#L&W BD PR (US)", "Wine, Jamie (NY)", "runo, Nicole", "Harris, Nicole (CH)", "Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY)", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR)", "Moore, Wendy (OC)", "Jennings, Alex (LA)", "Robins, Greg (LA)"], "timestamp": "Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM", "subject": "Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted:\n\nBUSINESS\n\nFederal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur<http://fw.to/aXv1QHI>\n\n[Farooq Bajwa]\nFarooq Bajwa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.txt_19856
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.txt
subject: Re: request
messages:
  [{"sender": "Susan Edelman [sedelman@nypost.com]", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 1:47 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Thanks,, Is there a specific date?\n\nDo you have a court order sealing the document?\n\nSusan Edelman\nReporter\n1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10036\n\n917-584-7675\nsedelman@nypost.com"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "August 2011\n\nDanny Frost\nDirector of Communications\nManhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, Jr.\n\n212-335-9400 // @ManhattanDA"}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman [sedelman@nypost.com]", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 1:38 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt_19860
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
subject: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:19 AM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories!\n\nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people\ncoming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out\nof all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're\nliving the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me\notherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying\nto avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give\nthem information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you\nget it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don’t need to be seen. I can not have press,\nmedia, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by\n\nmail. I realize you don’t have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can’t just get up and go like you. I\nleft the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I\nwould rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential\nover this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never\nunderstand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and\nGM’s) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then.\n\nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for\nthis."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033216.txt_19864
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033216.txt
subject: Trump could tap tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel for Germany job: Report
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 3:25:48 PM", "subject": "Trump could tap tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel for Germany job: Report", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/trump-could-tap-tech-entrepreneur-peter-thiel-for-germany-job-report.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031517.txt_19878
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031517.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "25 Oct 2016, at 19:30", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any news"}, {"sender": "Mark Lloyd", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2016 6:40:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "May have HBJ interested in a development in Kensington that could be purchased for £SOm and there would be \n1.5% for me. So fingers crossed. Which way do you think the election will go? I had supper with Conrad B the \nother day who was praising Trump!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030609.txt_19883
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030609.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023107.txt_19893
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023107.txt
subject: On the frontlines of the world's most stressful desk job
messages:
  [{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/16/2019 8:00:39 PM", "subject": "On the frontlines of the world's most stressful desk job", "body": "Interesting stories worth your time.\n\nGoing Down the Pipes\ntopic.com / Darcy Frey, Johanna Walderdorff By the mid-’90s, the American air traffic control system was on the verge of a nervous breakdown: broken equipment, insane overtime, and impossibly… read more \n\nPROMOTED BY BookBub\n\nBook Lovers Are Obsessed With This Site\n\nhttps://bookbub.com Earlier this year, the prices on blockbuster books were slashed for a limited time. A select group of readers were able to take advantage of them.\n\nHow the women of NASA made their mark on the space program\nlatimes.com / Molly Hennessy-Fiske The Civil Rights Act had just passed and the slide rule was giving way to computers when Frances “Poppy” Northcutt arrived at NASA’s Houston campus in… read more \n\n'Go Back Where You Came From': The Long Rhetorical Roots Of Trump's Racist Tweets\nnpr.org / Colin Dwyer , Andrew Limbong When President Trump tweeted his racist remarks Sunday, asking why certain Democratic congresswomen don't just \"go back and help fix the totally broken… read more \n\nThe rise and fall of French cuisine\ntheguardian.com / Wendell Steavenson French food was the envy of the world – before it became trapped by its own history. Can a new school of traditionalists revive its glories? By Wendell… read more \n\nRory McIlroy, two Irelands and a complicated Open homecoming\nespn.com / Ian O'Connor Ian O'Connor has won numerous national awards as a sports columnist and is the author of three books, including the bestseller, \"The Captain: The … read more \n\nMayor Rapinoe? Senator Rapinoe? President Rapinoe?!? In America’s World Cup Heroine, a Political Star Is Born\nvanityfair.com / Claire Landsbaum Megan Rapinoe has been honing her message for most of her career. Now her vision intersects perfectly with the political moment. Insiders calculate… read more \n\nTransgender Opera Singers Find Their Voices\nnytimes.com / MICHAEL COOPER AUSTIN, Tex. — Holding his whiskey in one hand and his Stetson in the other, the opera’s hero — a tough stagecoach driver — offered an unhappy barmaid… read more \n\nSufjan Stevens and the Curious Case of the Missing 48 States\ntheringer.com / Zach Schonfeld Remember when indie rock turned into a whimsical, state-by-state geography lesson? Sufjan Stevens was our banjo-plucking pied piper, traversing the … read more \n\nShould You Pay for TSA Precheck, Global Entry, or Clear?\nlifehacker.com / Lisa Rowan You’ve seen the special lines at the airport: People just breezing on through routine security measures while you’re waiting behind a family of … read more \n\nShoot the Stars: The Best New Smart Telescopes\nmensjournal.com / by Eric Adams These smart telescopes let you travel the universe from your yard—and bring back photographic souvenirs. read more \n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment.\n\nREAD MORE"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033564.txt_19895
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033564.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Ken Star", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 7:14:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken, delighted to meet. Jeffrey has long told me about your friendship and the respect he has for you. If you send me your mailing address, it would be my pleasure to send you my recent book about the Trump White House. I'm now at work on a sequel focusing on the legal case against Trump and Trump's response to it. Any counsel and background you might provide would aid me enormously and enrich the book. I, of course, would be willing to talk with you on an entirely off-the-record basis or under any arrangement that suits. Thanks in advance and I look forward to the chance to chat. All best, Michael"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken", "Michael"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken - Michael , Michael/ Ken"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt_19899
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt
subject: Re: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:15:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wild page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down. Then, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites. I spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself. What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head... We were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably. I must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k 'fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Jeffrey, The hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed. Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search. We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you. As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt_19907
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a new school.. if you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday thnx again"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 5:31:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "m in my car at your door.. can i ring or 2 sharp?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033202.txt_19908
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033202.txt
subject: SoftBank Pledges to Invest $50 Billion in U.S. After Meeting With Trump - WSJ
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [richardkahn@hbtk.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/6/2016 10:57:20 PM", "subject": "SoftBank Pledges to Invest $50 Billion in U.S. After Meeting With Trump - WSJ", "body": "http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-says-softbank-pledges-to-invest-50-billion-in-u-s-148 1053732"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026222.txt_19913
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026222.txt
subject: Re: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? wheredo you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029402.txt_19929
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029402.txt
subject: Fw: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)
messages:
  [{"sender": "HMS-in the News <HMS In The News@HMS.HARVARD.EDU>", "recipients": ["<HMSNEWS QUAD FAC STAFF@LISTSERV.MED.HARVARD.EDU>"], "timestamp": "March 22, 2017 at 2:34:12 PM EDT", "subject": "HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": "HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL\nCOMMUNICATIONS AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS\n\nIn the News\nWEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2017\n\nFlexibility on 'essential benefits' will increase cost of insurance for pregnancy, addiction and mental illness\nSTAT\nRichard Frank (HMS) co-authored this opinion piece arguing that the Republican health care bill could drive up the cost of coverage for pregnancy care, newborn care, and mental illness and addictive disorders treatment.\n\nDeepak Chopra speculates about Trump's brain\nUSA Today\nA noted alternative medicine advocate is the latest medical professional to speculate about President Trump's mental health. Rebecca Brendel (HMS/Mass General) discusses the so-called Goldwater rule of the American Psychiatric Association that discourages physicians from expressing public opinions about people whom they are not treating.\n\nCan my doctor out me to my parents?\nU.S. News & World Report\nThe article discusses the confidentiality, legal and ethical conundrums faced by LGBTQ minors and the pediatricians who treat them when it comes to disclosing certain medical information to parents and guardians. Alex Keuroghlian (HMS/Mass General) is mentioned.\n\nThe $10 million quest to build a home health device inspired by 'Star Trek'\nThe Washington Post\nThen there were two. A global competition to stimulate the innovation and integration of precision diagnostic technologies that will allow consumers to make their own medical diagnoses has been narrowed from 312 to two teams. Chung-Kang Peng (HMS/Beth Israel Deaconess) is the leader of one of the finalist teams. The winner will be announced in April.\n\nHarvard Medical School News Clips are not intended to provide an exhaustive review of all news sources. If you have any questions about our news clips, or would like to suggest an article for inclusion, please contact HMS News Clips@hmsharvard.edu. To unsubscribe to this mailing list, send an e-mail to HMSNEWS QUAD FAC STAFF-unsubscribe-request@listserv.med.harvard.edu with \"Unsubscribe\" as the subject."}, {"sender": "Tanzi, Rudolph E", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 22, 2017 2:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": "WOW!!!"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 7:29:01 PM", "subject": "Fw: HMS-Today's News (March 22, 2017)", "body": "See item # 2"}]


