# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt_15061
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun Sep 27 19:35:33 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when does have to get back? went to new york"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No later than Wednesday probably.."}, {"sender": "J J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "9/28/09 6:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thanks where are you.. i loved your bono mick story"}, {"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am in CA — that friend of yours whom I think lives in Paris was at the conference..she spoke to you last week..claims to be in charge of a hedge fund or something"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Mon Sep 28 19:16:28 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do yu mean nicole junkerman"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's her..I couldn't remember her name"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "9/28/2009 11:34:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we just rea;lzied that the picture, in my kitchen is me clinton and ted. how funny"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026637.txt_15066
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026637.txt
subject: Fwd: My Thoughts on Currencies
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon iii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 6:33:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: My Thoughts on Currencies", "body": "The smartest/most amusing piece of research I have read so far on Trump/global economy. You should pass on to DJT brain trust on economy/markets"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028768.txt_15073
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028768.txt
subject: FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012
messages:
  [{"sender": "Manuela Wieland [m.wieland@heute.at]", "recipients": ["e.dichand@heute.at"], "timestamp": "Montag, 07. Mai 2012 13:45", "subject": "Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Liebe Frau Dichand, \nanbei der Zeitablauf von der AMFAR Gala 2012 am 19.5.2012. \nLG MW"}, {"sender": "Eva Dichand", "recipients": ["Cavan Mahony", "Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 5:51 AM", "subject": "WG: zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Hallo everybody! \nAttached (sorry in Germain) the Programm fort he lifeball on the 19th. \nActually there will be a Galadinner with our prime minister and Bill Clinton and all kinds of stars in \nthe Hofburg (former imerial estate - very impressive to see from inside)) It is only 250 people,. A \nseated dinner and more upscale than the rest oft he evening. It start's at 5pm with a champagne cocktail \nand from there we go directly to the opening oft he ball where we'll have a really cool Box first row!! \npresscode: actually the lifeball is really crazy and 'half naked' we always do a intermediare because \notherwise you feel like an idiot at the Amfar Gala dinner before. People now don't wear Tuxedos anymore. \nchristoph wear's normal black trouseres with a white shirt and a dar sakko because he doesn't want to be \nin any crazy stuff on all the pics. Half oft he people oft he gala dinenr also waer some 'little' crazy \nstuff like pink velvet sakkos (and a mask for later) or so. girls: crazy as you like. There are a lot of \natrists that are really dressed up. i will wear a quiet see-through short dress with high high heels+ a \nchanel Tatoo and will take a face mask fort he ball later. \nSo i hope this helped at least a little bit. For pics got to: lifeball.org \nFriday night: we would like to invite you all for dinner and will organize a nice place with a cool bar. \nAress follows. Pls let me know who wants to join!! \nSunday: I'm very sure we'll be dead :-) BUT we would like to invite you to our house/garden/pool \n(swimmwear) for brunch starting at 11. Furfanggasse 4, 1190 Wien. From hotel sachen max. 15 min with \nTaxi. If you fly late we can walk from our house to one oft he famous Austrian heurigen ...and get some \nmore alcholic to drink :-) :-) \non Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La Clemenza de Tito. Very hard to get tickets but for 2 of \nyou i could still organize (hopefully9 if some of you already arrive on Thursday. \nBig kiss to everbody...I promise you...not often you will have seen something that crazy :-)"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:15 PM", "subject": "FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Eva is my friend there who will host us. She is very close friend with mette as well. \nEva and I are still trying to get mette to join at the last moment. \nShe and her family own 80% or so of Austrian media (Heute etc). She is describing program below. \nThe plan would be that we arrive to Vienna on Thursday 17th mid day. \nOn Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La clemenza de Tito and we go to that. \nON Friday Eva is organizing a dinner/reception with her friends. We can schedule some other \nmeetings/visits during day. \nOn Saturday the night starts at 5pm and goes through early next morning. \nleave first flight Sunday morning for San Francisco to meet Bill. \nIf you are staying in Vienna and have time (and like Eva) you should go to her brunch. \nHow this seems to you???"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028931.txt_15076
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028931.txt
subject: RE: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 5:52:30 PM", "subject": "RE: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are\nmuch more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find\ndismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc.,\noffensive — so be it.\n\nBut | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while\nrecognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their\nbeliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we\nshould ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument\nand evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma)\nare people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when\nthe icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike\nother countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose\ndoesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as our minds\nreflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession\nand the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt_15079
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt
subject: Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/19/2017 2:09:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHuge thanks for giving BBB another chance!!We have 200 quite fantastic young women \nincluding a minister, an ambassador-Lisa! a professor -your Anna!-a princess-Sofia! and \nthe other 196 \nare doing pretty good as well...lots of young girls in Sweden now dream of joining \nBBB...we really build something \nunique and worthwhile!! Young dean at Stockholm School of Economics is an idiot to \nthrough it all out but \nnow its time to develop it smartly! I will be doing a famous Summer radio program in a few \nweeks in Sweden, \n1 million listeners...among other things, I will talk about the girls..(and my blind date long \nago with a Donald \nTrump.. ha ha!) Anyway, please see details for the money transaction below - Edyta is my \nbanker ann a super \nperson! - I am leaving tomorrow night if anything? Also, if you send me a cell phone \nnumber, I can start sending \nyou photos from BBB, much easier than e-mail. \nTACK sweetheart for continuing believing in BBB! Kram BE"}, {"sender": "Edyta Wynberg", "recipients": ["behnbom"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 19, 2017 9:05 am", "subject": "SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Hej Barbro! \nBeneficiary name: BBB AB \nBeneficiarys bank: SEB ( Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken) \n106 40 Stockholm \nBeneficiarys bank SWIFT address/BIC: ESSESESS \nBeneficiarys account no: \nIBAN: IBAN \nVi hors \nKram"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt_15080
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food°"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:30:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt_15081
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt
subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["nancy dahl", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:53:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft: \nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements \non your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor \nstudents, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your \nreporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known \nindividuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to \nmore scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and \nallegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have \nremained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer \nor an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the \nfact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 \nmeetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally \nappreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your \nreport is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of \nyour 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than \nallegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other \norganizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my \ncontributions and my actions. \nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in \n2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be \nappropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an \nanonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in \nany university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a \nbar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident \n5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is \nwhat I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down. \nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail, \nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came \nto me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was \ndifferent than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, \nbut she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since \nshe was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult \nfor her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had \nasked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have \ngone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I \nusually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee \nwith her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch \nme do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students \non campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not least \nbecause there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to have \nbeen offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in \n2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife \nand I gave her a lift well out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her \nemail about the conference, again in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice \nversa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to \nthe human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told \nthat no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young \nwoman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my \nintentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-\nstanding attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among \nthe faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have \nany further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also told \nthat because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, \nand (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from \nmy record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you. \nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically \nstated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the \noutside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this \ncomplaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a \ncomplaint, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and \ndismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities \nthat because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to \nthe University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated thoroughly by both ASU and ANU and \nboth came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. In addition \nANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting \ndistortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a \ntemporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along \nwith the statement made in the complaint that \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the \ntime of the incident.\" \nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent \nwith the original claim and apparent later claims as follows: \n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident. \n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched \nin \nan unwelcome manner. \n- The conference attendee who took the `selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016). \n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016). \nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact. \n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who \ntook \nthe `selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was \nrequested \nin the course of the investigation.\" \n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies \nnot to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour) \nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, \nand when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am \nparticularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. \nThus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes \nthem feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI \nconference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the \ninteractions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female \ngraduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever \ncomplained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and \ntreat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations \nagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in \ndetail. \nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 \nbelow). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and \nfabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious \nintent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it. \nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve \nUniversity, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I \nam reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia \nHughes. \nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). \nOur reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, \nArizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center \nfor Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints \nand concerns about your behavior during this time. \nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and \neyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, \nstudents, and peers in the skeptics movement. \nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you \nwish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are \nplanning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028925.txt_15084
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028925.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of etails where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has ots of traction"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 4, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 9:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Kabuki Sec royals money"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 8:34:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I got another email from a colleague of his saying, \"they picked the wrong adversary in Dersh. It will be his new life mission. \""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt_15086
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt
subject: Re: Russian House
messages:
  [{"sender": "MM", "recipients": ["JP"], "timestamp": "05/04/2009 04:28 PM", "subject": "Russian House", "body": "JP: What is the address of the former Trump mansion on North Ocean purchased by the Russian?"}, {"sender": "John Page", "recipients": ["Mayor"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Russian House", "body": "Happy to help. The address is 515 N. County Road."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt_15088
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nowak, Martin A. <martin.a.nowak@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 20, 2017, at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very happy to talk\nwhich number may i call?\nor skype?"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thank you Jeffrey!\nMartin, great meeting you. I'd be happy to have a call for around 20 min whenever it's convenient for you. Let me know.\nMasha"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A.", "Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2017, at 4:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "martin, masha is helpiing me with PR, I told her she might want to speak to you, im copying her on this mail"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 22, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you Martin! let's do Skype?I'm there as mashadrokova. What time is the best for you? I'm in Europe now, early morning/afternoon would be ideal."}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Today would be good. Some time in the afternoon?"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sure, I'm available in 1.5 h and next few hours (until 11:30am PST). What time zone are you at?"}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ET time\nplease call me on Skype when you are ready"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great, will do"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Aug 2, 2017, at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nThanks for the great call last week. Enjoyed it a lot. Could I ask you some follow up questions?\nQuestion to be answered by Martin.\n• What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?\n• Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?\n• The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?\n• Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?\n• What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?\n• What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)\n• How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?\nQuestion\n• Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It's a hot topic given this story"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nJust wanted to check if you've seen the previous email.\nIf it's more convenient for you to discuss it by Skype, let me know. If you want to skip any of them it's not a problem."}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt_15090
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt
subject:
  Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/23/2016 3:03:49 PM", "subject": "Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly", "body": "https://www.washinetonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023431.txt_15092
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023431.txt
subject: Re: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:48:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "I know, and I'm immensely grateful\n\n. | would like to send you not only the NEH , but a harvard budget for the Ed school initiative with EdLabs.\nThis may take a few days. But I'm on it\n\nThank you Jeffrey\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 8:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "I only want you to succeed.. I suggest that as this is charity , the numbers will be scrutinized more\n\nheavily. ( could have gone for food for homeless etc ) please send me the neh proposal that you mentioned. I\nassume there is a full budget."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Jeffrey , if you are conceding any bit of the other things , with all due respect, that's exciting, as its new for me\nto be right about anything in the area of budgets .\nAs it happens,and as of today , there is huge dissatisfaction in public television world with the lower budget\nClinton footage versus the Herbie Hancock footage. David g was there for Herbie and not for Clinton. I can see\nthe difference .the pilot was made for 100, 000 , with savings on the Clinton but it does show"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <M>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my\nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on my\nproducer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be\nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there .\nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget .\nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no\n\nactors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david\nbrooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less --"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023357.txt_15094
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023357.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Office, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax\nexperience. .castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a\nbill ) eva goes. outsource as much as possible.. bookkeeping systems built from scratch, airplane\nrestructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really\nwant these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts\nactivity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA rethinks . household and construction\n\narchitects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family\noffice. . decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years... insurance. operations. airplane ,\netc. . artfoundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line\nbanking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ). airplane certificate, redone jet aviation\nredo. . _— paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. .\n\ntoday is Oct 15"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "1. 80 percent of contracted job is accomplished, now drafting ,signing and few critical decisions on your part\nstill await , will fill in nec blanks, 1, how much of upside to kids. , 2, protections . 3 allocations. 4.\ncharitiable, inventory, securities,\n\n2 .to engage the second phase if youso choose , and considering there is only 8 more to be paid this\n\nyear in oct, for the job now almost completed, total of 23. that was agreed only for history fix.\n\n3. with the necessary proprietary protections , proposal is for first year only an additional 17 . making it 40 , but\nfull year balance on signing , ie 25. takes care of 2013\n\n4, moving forward , 40 per year ,( approx 1 percent ) for three years, to be credited against an agreed\nformula. Im open to suggestions total approx 120 for new workover 3 years , benefits to you over the next 20.\n5, can consider interests other than cash as payment. ?\n\n6. need to speak re , bankers, valuations, mechanics and their continued importance."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:03 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "to refresh your recollection, as 4 states. 40a year for three years. asisaid today. . the other was in addtion\nas you recall."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "NO sorry not until i hear from leon\n\nleon. to be fair, I had sent the first note to you one year ago . stating that my work would come to an end on\noct 15. that day had meaning as everything would be closed. you asked that i continue to help brad. as of\nnov though he would officially start in jan. I said ok, but ..... \" you told me to continue as we would work\nsomething out\" I told you my fee then was 40. feb you came with ben while kathy ruemmler was here. and\nsaid next week, debra got bad news. and I quickly prioritzed not adding stress to your situation. I wont\nregurgitate the interim, though millions of dollars were saved since. millions. . it is now one year later and you\npropose 10 mlllion , plus a contingent fee . [have said that i would work with you , and if contingent and a\npercentage of something. I strongly believe that is not in your interest. I continue to put our friendship first\nand dont want you to write a check for over 100million andthe i will have to listen to lewie for the next few\nyears. but if you prefer over my objection a percentage deal then it should be of all savings not just\n\nphaidon. ( arandom concept). The idea that 1 am somehow even marginally responsible for neither you nor\nheather , ever telling me that there was an unresolved issue, though you said you had been pinged a number of\ntimes is emblematic .\n\nI can do a call with you and Karp. anytime you like today, but ican assure you 100 percent that there is no\nlight between our positions. ZERO. and he is ready to do his best to try to explain it to you."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt_15099
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 7:51:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt_15108
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince \nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells \nRadarOnline.com. \nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and \nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year. \nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds \nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims, \nlosing $67 million. \nThe source says it's all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and \nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1. \nMeanwhile, Epstein's life behind bars hasn't been too rough — in fact he's allowed to spend most days at his \nattorney's office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy \nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he's been guarded by men in suits with \nearphones. \nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he's freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St. \nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey-epstein\n\nHELP ; a reporter for the ny times wants to write the following; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We \nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of govt , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the \nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt_15110
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt
subject: Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "[triyersr@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/11/2018 5:34:33 PM", "subject": "Update", "body": "miss chatting with you \nam back at work; will give keynote to the Louisiana State Psychological Association \nin early November and next day meet with department heads and deans for three local Universities, Tulane, \nNew Orleans, Louisiana State to see if some kind of 3-year deal can be worked out \nthen off to U Texas at Austin and Texas A&M, to which i have never been—biology is very strong in genetics \nand they may be interested—i will lecture to them on Recent Advances in Human Evolutionary Genetics, a \nspecialty of mine \ni attach latest version of Honour Killings—key is to look at are the PHOTOS—the women are almost without \nfail beautiful \ngiven that i was perhaps a little cruel or frenetic over Jim Watson i attach a short remembrance of his other side, \nFrancis Crick, a much more broad-minded and friendly organism \ni don't give one shit about race and IQ by the way—and i hope it is clear that VARIANCE in genetic traits of all \nvarieties is expected to be especially high in Africa—hence it is the source of all successful hominid \ninvasions—but i am saying nothing about AVERAGE difference in intelligence or anything else \ni will shortly send you a piece onTrump as a narcissistic sociopath \nfinally here is a joke for you—we are both, i believe, politically—and not sexually—polymorphic perverse so \nthere should be no problem with this character \nhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/blindfold-sex-men-trick-dating-app-ana-duarte-xavier-straight-\na8571076.html  \nall best \np.s. please remember to tell me when to take my money out of the market!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt_15112
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume no dinner"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt_15115
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\n\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\n\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the\nYemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to\nYemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\n\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\n\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international\npressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace\nefforts.\n\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,\" he noted.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah AI-\nAhmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign\nminister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings.\n\n\"We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome you\nif you sign the agreement and not to waste time. But it appears that the revolutionaries are not ready to respond\nto this step,\" he said.\n\nAl Meahlafi said he visited Brussels for two-days of talks with the Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders,\nEuropean Commission officials and Members of the European Parliament to explain the situation in Yemen\nand seek support for the Yemeni government's peace efforts.\n\nHe said the Yemeni government seeks peace based on the three references, the Gulf initiative, the outputs of\nthe national dialogue, and the Security Council resolutions on Yemen, including resolution 2216.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister called on the EU to condemn the revolution and the Iranian interference in\nYemen, which is sending arms to the Houthi militias."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi\nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon. email you after. how much fun"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 9:38:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think .. and if peace agreement\nwas signed in kuwait that would be we eed\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032775.txt_15116
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032775.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 2:42:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Good lord. A novella of rehashed crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 22, 2018, at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-me-too"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030712.txt_15122
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030712.txt
subject: Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Thu, 15 Mar 2018 06:46:54 -0400", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "yesIsawit 1 iwill invite gerry baker to our dinnner tonight. 2 miro lajcak. president of UN. will guide the EU project if you like him. his govt will fall this week - as planned. :) 3. later today we can discuss michael and his coins. 4. sultan - duabi in new york 21 22"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "What time is dinner?\n\nDo u want me to come over beforehand ???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mar 15, 2018, at 7:00 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "sure ! dinner 7. come at 6?\n\nhttps://blindgossip.com/?p=89824"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2018 11:07:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "Done"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030429.txt_15135
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030429.txt
subject: Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 20 2014 06:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Looks like Priceline Director made a bad move today and has the same name - this works to our advantage.\nPushing on this story now."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031418.txt_15144
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031418.txt
subject: Re: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2015 2:40:08 AM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nLOPE EORTC onemeennennenteeennaiiees ."}, {"sender": "J Jep", "recipients": ["GG", "Indyke, Darren K."], "timestamp": "Monday, September 21, 2015 at 22:08 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\na a a ee"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030706.txt_15149
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030706.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:28:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Depends on calculus for Ryan and McConnell who crave continued power above all else and would be thrilled if trump died"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think it comes down to trump obstruction. vs clintons wrondoing. timing. ? election impact etc. kelly is not political. so half his job not getting done"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\n\nDon’t follow your note. What texts"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey’s chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI’s personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030367.txt_15161
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030367.txt
subject: RE: [External]
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:31 PM", "subject": "[External]", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Spinella", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:46:53 PM", "subject": "RE: [External]", "body": "We cannot print it since we don’t subscribe"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029150.txt_15166
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029150.txt
subject: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@qmail.com]"], "timestamp": "December 29, 2017 at 3:21:43 PM EST", "subject": "Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes - see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today - mother 102 in May.)\n\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\n\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry, biology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n\n4. Power Laws\n5. Mathematical Biology\n\n6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)\n\nADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes\n\n9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/1/2018 10:36:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032985.txt_15182
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032985.txt
subject: Re: Masa
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <1.1>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2o17/03/o3/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event. I know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not opposed."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "great , thanks, or new york , or this weekend as donald arrives at 5pm tonight"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "OK. Let me see what I can do. What is the latest from the inner circle?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:36:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "they believe all on track, . tax policy, big changes. . law and order and immigration. . . jobs. . however russia not going away anytime soon. . lots of people with magnifiying glasses."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030373.txt_15183
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030373.txt
subject: RE: whoopsie
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kap, Brod S"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Oct 02, 2018, 7:27 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-\n\n2018-10-02"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 1:49:27 AM", "subject": "RE: whoopsie", "body": "Brutal piece."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622.txt_15184
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622.txt
subject: list for bannon steve
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "mandelson", "barnaby summers watson", "axel bottstein", "karim terje", "pritzker edelman", "set lloyd", "martin novak", "minsky", "tata susskind", "strominger krauss", "hopkins", "randall", "kosslyn", "gardner gates", "thiel", "hoffman", "hoie sinofsky", "sheldrake", "suzlberger", "jes staley", "joscha bach", "joiito", "HBJ berge", "miro", "anas raafat", "sultan", "nathan feigenbaum", "ramashandran", "goelberg", "demasio", "shristakas brockman hillis", "kaufman", "seligman", "gould", "saks", "john kery", "george mitchell", "mandelbbrot", "chomsky", "barrack barak", "zagat", "nathan", "brian greene", "yau", "eo wilson", "prince andrews", "jagland", "clinton pastrana", "richardson", "leahy", "jarecki", "schumer", "ranieri", "waheed", "mongolia gambat ehud", "jacque lang woody", "churkin", "sergey", "ruemmler", "weingarten", "amabani", "rochsild", "dersh", "ken starrk karp", "dubai castro", "pople queen", "pres king pm", "mandelson balir", "mette", "midlefafrt", "gergen", "melusine margarita ovitz", "barrak", "mabuto", "kashoogi", "rockefeller"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 30 2019 11:41 AM", "subject": "list for bannon steve", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033060.txt_15197
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033060.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030909.txt_15203
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030909.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 11:42:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Here is my response to the hundreds who are now attacking me on the web:\n\nI will add one remark here, as most people have not read my full set of comments, posted after the post\nappeared.. I am myself rather disappointed by the lack of skepticality of this community. As I said, I have read\nnumerous reports of orgies on Jeffrey’s island involving me and other scientists during our meetings.. Orgies\nthat never happened, Iam VERY skeptical of other claims on his behavior. I am defending Jeffrey for 2\nreasons: (1) Based on my knowledge and experience I am skeptical of the claims in the media and of those who\nhave settled claims for money... namely I don’t believe the published details just like I tend to be skeptical of\nmany published details on the internet.. I don’t believe Jeffrey did what has been claimed, and unless I see hard\nevidence, I will trust my own judgement here, and (2) Jeffrey went to prison, and I happen to believe that\nhaving served time, even those who questioned his behavior should be willing to give him the benefit of the\ndoubt, again until proved otherwise, that he is working hard to live a good life and do good things. I for one am\ndisgusted that people eat up the salacious nonsense the read on the web and then jump to conclusions about\nthings and people they do not know.. I do not jump to condemn people, especially when it concerns their sexual\npreferences. [DO NOT CONDONE sex with young girls, or young boys for that matter.. because there are real\nvictims there.. Until I know all the facts however, I do not jump to conclusions, and I am sorry, having seen the\nmedia frenzy around Jeffrey, and having seen the shoddy behavior of those who have attacked him, I remain\nskeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\n\nL. Krauss"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019410.txt_15235
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019410.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com]", "recipients": ["Alexandra Wolfe"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI_am_also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\n\nJay Lefkowitz"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.txt_15241
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.txt
subject: RE: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — \nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a \nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records \nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have \nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. \nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? \nPlease let me know."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 1U:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... \nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of \ngoing forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition \nwill follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:05 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt_15247
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt
subject: Re: Joe cinque
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayern"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 11:45:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "never heard off him. donald is close to no one. . he talks to many people. he tells each one something\ndiffernt."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "Do you know him I heard he is so close to trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011964.txt_15255
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011964.txt
subject: Scouting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Sanka", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "12/12/2014 12:48 (GMT-05:00)", "subject": "Scouting", "body": "Jean Luc,\n\nHow are you?\n\nAfter so many years scouting for you and having a great network of agencies all around the world who enjoy to work with us, i wanted to let you know that we are on the way to lose everything we build and we are gonna have big problem now.\n\nAgencies, still want to work with us but parents don't want their daughters to come to us, because when they google your name and the agency name the only things they see is \"Sex Trafficking\"!!!\n\nIt's impossible to sign a new girl and if nothing it's done i can tell you that in 3 months we we will not get any new girls and i don't see how the agency will work without new faces.\n\nAll the agencies who know you don't have any problems with you since they all told me \"We know Jean Luc for more than 20 years and all those years we had so many girls place with him who had better experience than in any other agencies who were representing them as well and we never had any problems whatsoever, all our girls had great carriers as a model when he represented them\".\n\nI understand those agencies because it's hard for them to talk to parents and explain that it's not the truth when it's all over the internet.\n\nYou need to have it stop and have the people write an official letter to say that it's not the truth...\n\nI will keep you posted of course but it's really bad for us and the scouting.\n\nBest regards\n\nMichael Sanka"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt_15256
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gerald Barton <Gerald Barton> (on behalf of Jeevacation@gmail.com)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Gi Feather", "Gerald Barton"], "timestamp": "4/23/2014 12:07:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Thank you for the kindness shown to me and my family in the periodic availability of the New York apartment. \nLesley has done an admirable job in making us feel welcome and always with good cheer. \nSome years ago, we talked about the opportunity to use Landmark's $166 million tax loss. At that time, my \nambition, ego, or stupidity limited the discussion. My memory is you, after discussions with Larry Summers, \ndecided the pursuit was not worth the prey. Now, age (which I laughingly call maturity) or new information, \nhas opened doors that I believe we can now accomplish the goals we discussed some years ago. \nIf, at a time and place of your convenience, you had 30 minutes for me to outline the fundamentals of the plan, \nyou would know what I believe would work and if your mental quickness is still there, you would know \nwhether or not you wanted to proceed. Certainly, when the goal is so great, 30 minutes with an old friend is not \na great sacrifice. \nOn a personal note, your friend, Larry Summers, recently gave a meaningful speech in Toronto entitled \"Will \n2014 End Up Like 1914\". You may find it worth reading. Your friend, Donald Trump recently purchased a \nproject we developed on the west coast of Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been consistently rated the best \nresort in Europe. \nJeffrey, please let me know when and where this is convenient for you. \nJerry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032952.txt_15259
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032952.txt
subject: Re: Presidential inauguration
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Should I accept the invitation sent by Tom barrack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 2:49:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/tom-barrack-donald-trump-inauguration/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023627.txt_15262
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023627.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 8 2016 08:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "It’s an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the dining room is grand but peaceful, creating a hermetic or stop-time sense, broken only by the household staff ferrying in time-of-day-appropriate exotic foods and beverages.\n\nThe real world seems terribly far away, but with paparazzi often posted near by, it’s dangerously close too. Once I arrived for a visit and found several police cars blocking the street and thought the worst—they’d come for him . But it was a massive security detail for a well known head of state who had come for tea.\n\nWe met several years before he became arguably the world’s most notorious sex offender. In 2002, his plane, a meticulously appointed 727, ferried a group of people to the TED conference in Monterey. He was the mysterious and peculiarly gracious host arriving after everyone had boarded: tanned, relaxed, attentive, soliciting every guest’s story and views, and accompanied by three young women not his daughters, witty, poised, helpful, and beautiful—out of a men’s magazine fantasy of the luxe life.\n\nOne more thing about this trip suggesting something of his unique view of the public world and what you got to see when you are near him. Google founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, with their company rising into the stratosphere, came out to see his plane on the Monterey tarmac and, with a few other Googlers, literally ran whooping from one end of the plane to the other. Then, sitting in the plane’s plush living room, they described, in what I could not be sure was a put-on or entrepreneurial brainstorm, the future of search ..\n\nSince that trip, and through his travails, I have often been invited to his house to participate in the conversations of the newest ideas that often take place there.\n\nIn sweatshirt, draw-string pants, palm beach slippers, and half glasses, Jeffrey Epstein—that Epstein, most recently embroiled in charges involved under age women ,Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew—spends most of his day at his dining room table in the in front of a laptop and beside a row of reading glasses (there are a lot of them in case, apparently, he misplaces a pair, but being quite meticulous he never does) conducting what must surely be the world’s most extraordinary colloquial. Pictures on the table have Jeffrey and prime minister, princes, leading scientists.with fidel castro next to the photo with pope, I guess his attempt at levity.\n\nThese meetings, and this lifestyle, have somehow stayed private or secret—or apart—not out of any formal or stated restrictions, but because, in some sense, it would be very hard to explain just what you’re doing there with a well known sex offender ina mouth dropping home flaunting all moderation.\n\nAnd yet, defying controversy , and tolerating his societal tone deafness—or shy attitude toward the zeitgeist—still so many come. Gladly. Willingly. Feeling that his invitation is frankly quite an extraordinary privilege.\n\nAmong his frequent guests is Bill Gates, for whom Epstein has become a friend, proposing a way to leverage the resources of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to accommodate many other fortunes, so that, Epstein explains, “you might join 10 or 20 billionaires on one giving project.” They can leverage your unique experience and expertise in the philanthropic world and learn from your early mistakes. As part of a many friends encouraged effort to get “out in front” of the notice that might be expected when it was revealed the number and wide diversity of the most rarified thinkers of our generation that come to visit . Epstein agreed to a limited on-the-record conversation with me.\n\nHis subject, on a morning in late fall, sitting at the dining room table—its humorous but baronial quality disturbed by an ever-present white board—is “hyper wealth.” His subject is always wealth—how capital , in uber amounts should react to the given new global political, economic, and cultural moment.\n\nHis stock in trade is not the making of money, (his proletariat background not withstanding ) but the issues that arise when wealth growing at a heretofore unimaginable rate, makes its entrance , altering many basic economic, social, and personal calculations. Watching his presentation recounts a math class of the mighty.\n\nThe professor at the blackboard and the students ( the titans ), still hoping they are not called upon to answer a difficult question.\n\nHe recounts a dinner he had two nights before. The scene is, like much of what he does, a conspiracy theorist’s fantasy—the six men at this dinner, all technology entrepreneurs, representing, together, over a hundred billion dollars and now trying to figure out how to use their resources in order to help shape the world."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt_15277
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:17:38 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029106.txt_15282
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029106.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "10/11/2017 3:04:05 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press. \nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster. \nThis is a staggering shit show."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt_15285
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt
subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012", "subject": "Happy new year!", "body": "All the best in new year.\n\nFor more fun in new year.\n\nAnd for little Jeffrey soon to come ;-)\nThank you for being such a great friend\n\nGoing to sleep. Still in Bangkok.\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 05:53 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 07:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Nonono just wanted you to that iris was also in Bangkok . I forgot about the Boris wish"}, {"sender": "Jean Luc Brunel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/1/2013 12:51:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Saved for 2012 but I can start to look for baby clothes if the wish turns into reality. Or would you stick with RL baby around the corner? Forgot that you r planning everything\n\nI will send you picture of the Burmese girl. Very pretty She is the star singer in Myamar. I will bring her to US. Obama visits Myamar and Chan Chan comes to America. I think that I have something new and fresh news to promote"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030921.txt_15295
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030921.txt
subject: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032946.txt_15300
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032946.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you know if can go to morrocan consulate for visa today. ? do i see you before i leave?"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have sent the passport copy to my contact who will talk with the Moroccan consulate today morning and will advise me. If not today, then it will be on Monday. I'll let you know. I can see you anytime after 3pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she leaves tonight"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok, let her apply for a visa at the consulate the normal way. Once applied sent me a copy of the submission receipt and the application form, so I can do the necessary through my contact in Morocco."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On 16 Dec 2016 2:45 p.m.", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you free to visit?"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 17, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry i just checked your email. What time you will leve to the airport"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I hope you are in a better place now than NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "12/17/2016 8:30:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry, yes, palm beach, all trump people here"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029839.txt_15301
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029839.txt
subject: Re: following up: WA poetry release
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years ago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we would love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1 jjxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVbLS?preview=WoodyA llen+Basict+Clipt+fort+ Viewing. mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed conversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\nAl Gore\nJohn McCain\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\nMayor Tom Menino\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\nSir Mervyn King\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under way to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United States and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television series we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a series of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and for their students."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 5:58:45 PM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised- both subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions. Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter project with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026234.txt_15312
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026234.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun!!! When are you back in NYC?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope today is fun for you."}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok dylan will want to see you I always want to see you. Where are you having thanksgiving?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "eva"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "That means glenn check out his red hair!!!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:18 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "berries color for holiday"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He's such a snooze who else is down there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "david fizel. hanson. trump"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates [faithkates@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/23/2017 2:41:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Have fun!!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031748.txt_15313
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031748.txt
subject:
  Fwd: TV ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Conchita Sarnoff"], "timestamp": "July 17, 2016 at 3:28:16 PM EDT", "subject": "T V ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": "HI\nNOW IS THE TIME TO PUT\nTHE MS SARNOFF NEW BOOK INTO MY TRUMP SUPER PAC T V ADS TELLING ALL ABO\nUT THE TWO CORRUPT CLINTONS F B I COVER UP ORDERED TO KEEP JEFF EPSTEIN OU\nT OF FEDERAL PROSON !!!!\nMARTY FEINBERG YOUR AD T V AGENCY WILL PRODUCE THE ABOVE TRUMP SUPER P\nAC T V ADS .\nTHE MS SARNOFF NEW BOOK WILL BE USED IN EACH TRUMP SUPER PAC T V AD.\nMS SARNOFF PLEASE TELL STEVEN HOFFENBERG IF YOU ARE 0 K WITH THE ABOVE T\nV ADS USE OF YOUR NEW BOOK ???\nMARTY & ROGER PLEASE WIPE THE FLOOR WITH THE CORRUPT 2 CLINTONS & THE M\nASS RAPIST OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS JEFF EPSTEIN IN THE TRUMP SUPER PAC T V ADS\nNOW !!!!!\nC E 0 TRUMP SUPER PAC\nGET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!"}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 17, 2016 at 12:34:29 PM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: T V ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 7:46:17 PM", "subject": "Fwd: TV ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt_15314
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt
subject: FW: World Bank Nominee
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2012 7:10:58 PM", "subject": "FW: World Bank Nominee", "body": "The Atlantic Home\nFriday, March 23, 2012\n\n° Politics i\nMassoud Hayoun - Massoud Hayoun writes for and produces The Atlantic's International channel.\n\nHow Jim Yong Kim, Obama's World Bank Pick,\nChanged Global Health Aid\n\nBy Massoud Hayoun\n\nMar 23 2012, 2:04 PM ET\n\nThe international public health work that made Kim, now the president's nominee for World Bank head, such a\nrespected figure.\n\nPresident Obama introduces Jim Yong Kim as his nominee to be the next president of the World Bank / Reuters\n\nPresident Obama announced today that he will nominate Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to head\nthe World Bank. Although Kim is a physician by training, officials have observed that Kim's role as a key\nplayer in global health and development, notably with his role in the organization Partners in Health (PIH),\nmakes him a key candidate to change the attitudes of developing-world nations."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt_15317
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him? \nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - \nMy very best wishes and my thanks! \nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 7 2011 05:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026069.txt_15318
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026069.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building\nand financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history\nand presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors\nto the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought\nsecure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry,\nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure\ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily\ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence,\ncapital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across\nall funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise\nwithin infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild\nhas also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these\ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny qq", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the\nsidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the\nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to\n10% per yr with a kicker\n\nAriane de Rothschild"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 23:22", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "not likely in the states. toomuch money around. you should finda niche. otherwise competing with people\nthat have a trillion dollars in credit needs"}, {"sender": "a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:23:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Pension funds are now interested to match the maturities ?\nAriane de Rothschild"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt_15319
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:02 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "eveything ok, we waited"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I got completely swamped, and then had a dinner with George Tenet and my military guy from Brookings. My fault. Is larry coming by again today?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nope, how was tenet"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 9 2014 01:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Everyone is talking about Gates comments on Obama. Surprised by what Gates did. I talked with Daley yesterday, and he thought that Gates making his comments while Obama is still in the White House, completely irresponsible. Lots of talk on Israel and Iran. Gives a higher chance that Israel goes it alone than I have heard elsewhere."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030920.txt_15326
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030920.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "so would i"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ps. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and Iam therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 4:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "I know.. it is one of the reasons I respect you.\n\nbtw.. this was the last note I sent out to the blogs... after that I gave up..\n\n\"I will add one remark here, as most people have not read my full set of comments, posted after the post\nappeared.. I am myself rather disappointed by the lack of skepticality of this community. As I said, I have read\nnumerous reports of orgies on Jeffrey’s island involving me and other scientists during our meetings.. Orgies\nthat never happened. I am VERY skeptical of other claims on his behavior. I am defending Jeffrey for 2\nreasons: (1) Based on my knowledge and experience I am skeptical of the claims in the media and of those who\nhave settled claims for money... namely I don’t believe the published details just like I tend to be skeptical of\nmany published details on the internet.. I don’t believe Jeffrey did what has been claimed, and unless I see hard\nevidence, I will trust my own judgement here, and (2) Jeffrey went to prison, and I happen to believe that\nhaving served time, even those who questioned his behavior should be willing to give him the benefit of the\ndoubt, again until proved otherwise, that he is working hard to live a good life and do good things. I for one am\ndisgusted that people eat up the salacious nonsense they read on the web and then jump to conclusions about\nthings and people they do not know.. I do not jump to condemn people, especially when it concerns their sexual\npreferences. [DO NOT CONDONE sex with young girls, or young boys for that matter.. because there are real\nvictims there.. Until I know all the facts however, I do not jump to conclusions, and I am sorry, having seen the\nmedia frenzy around Jeffrey, and having seen the shoddy behavior of those who have attacked him, I remain\nskeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030934.txt_15331
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030934.txt
subject: Sam Fields on 302 Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Ken Jenne", "Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 15:48:27", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI |\n\nGuest Columnist\n\nActually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called in federal court \"The 302\". It\ncould screw the innocent and the unwary.\n\nThe newspapers and Browardbeat.com make clear that the Federal investigations that led to the arrests\nof County Commissioner Josephus Eggleston, former Miramar Commissioner Fitzroy Salesman and\nSchool Board member Bev Gallagher are just beginning.\n\nThe FBI will be interviewing everyone from County Administrator Bertha Henry to bus drivers about\nanything and everything.\n\nThey are looking for scalps.\n\nI suspect that if the average person thought about it, he would assume that when the FBI comes calling,\nlike Joe Friday from DRAGNET, they \"want the facts and nothing but the facts.\" Equally important\nthey want an accurate record of that interview so they bring a court reporter or at-the very least a tape\nrecorder.\n\nThe average person would be wrong.\n\nAgents bring a pencil and pad to take notes. They then prepare a summary of the interview called a\n\"302 Report.\" : s\n\nIf you are called as a witness at trial, prior to testifying, you will be given a copy of \"Your 302\" to -\nreview. It is a record of what the FBI insists you said at your previous meeting.\n\nIf your interview lasted more than thirty seconds, it is guaranteed’you will find numerous discrepancies.\nSome of them will be insignificant; some of them could be material.\n\nAsk two people to listen to you in a discussion about a traffic accident and then write a summary. It is a\nguaranteed they will have differences with each other as well as with you, the witness."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033495.txt_15340
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033495.txt
subject: Fwd: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 4:45:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 4:45:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "photos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use vinyl for your \"E= \" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting, this would enable easy removal if = plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses vinyl for logos.=\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering w.= th slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Guy Amico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh", "JR Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:16 pm", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt_15341
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt
subject: macreonomics issue
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/10/2011 9:45:51 PM", "subject": "macreonomics issue", "body": "do you think something like this is worthwhile and should i engage?\n\nFor Federal Programs, a Taste of Market Discipline\nBy DAVID LEONHARDT\nPublished: February 8, 2011\n\nWouldn't it be nice if taxpayers could somehow get a refund for government programs that didn't work? Instead, the opposite tends to happen. Programs that fail to make a difference — like many of those that train workers for new jobs — endure indefinitely. Often, policy makers don't even know which work and which don't, because rigorous evaluation is rare in government. And competition, which punishes laggards in the private sector, is typically absent in the public sector.\n\nBut there is some good news on this front. Lately, both American and British policy makers have been thinking about how to bring some of the competitive discipline of the market to government programs, and they have hit on an intriguing idea.\n\nDavid Cameron's Conservative government in Britain is already testing it, at a prison 75 miles north of London. The Bloomberg administration in New York is also considering the idea, as is the State of Massachusetts. Perhaps most notably, President Obama next week will propose setting aside $100 million for seven such pilot programs, according to an administration official.\n\nThe idea goes by one of two names: pay for success bonds or social impact bonds. Either way, nonprofit groups like foundations pay the initial money for a new program and also oversee it, with government approval. The government will reimburse them several years later, possibly with a bonus — but only if agreed-upon benchmarks show that the program is working.\n\nIf it falls short, taxpayers owe nothing.\n\nThe first British test is happening at Her Majesty's Prison Peterborough, where 60 percent of the prisoners are convicted of another crime within one year of release. Depressingly enough, that recidivism rate is typical for a British prison.\n\nTo reduce the rate, a nonprofit group named Social Finance is playing a role akin to venture capitalist. It has raised about $8 million from investors, including the Rockefeller Foundation. Social Finance also oversees three social service groups helping former prisoners find work, stay healthy and the like. If any of those groups starts to miss its performance goals, it can be replaced.\n\nFor the investors to get their money back starting in 2014 — with interest — the recidivism rate must fall at least 7.5 percent, relative to a control group. If the rate falls 10 percent, the investors will receive the sort of return that the stock market historically delivers. \"It's been only a few months,\" says Tracy Palandjian, who recently opened a new Social Finance office in Boston, \"but the numbers are coming in O.K.\"\n\nAntony Bugg-Levine of the Rockefeller Foundation told me it had invested in the project for two main reasons. One, it expected to get its money back and then be able to reuse it. Two, if social impact bonds work, they have the potential to attract for-profit investors — and vastly expand the pool of capital that's available for social programs.\n\nClearly, social impact bonds have limitations. For starters, it's hard to see how private money could ever pay for multibillion-dollar programs like Medicaid or education.\n\nJust as important, the execution of any bond program will be complicated. It will depend on coming up with the right performance measures, which is no small matter. Done wrong, the measures will end up rewarding programs lucky (or clever) enough to enroll participants who are more likely to succeed no matter what.\n\nBut whatever the caveats about the bonds, the potential for improving the government's performance is obviously huge. That's true in education, health care, criminal justice and many other areas.\n\nA recent review found that 10 major social programs had been rigorously evaluated over the past two decades, using the scientific gold standard of random assignment. Only one of the 10 — Early Head Start, for infants, toddlers pregnant women — was a clear success. Yet all 10 still exist, and largely in their original form.\n\nJon Baron, the president of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy in Washington, points out that the social problems addressed by antipoverty programs have not gotten much better in years. School test scores have barely changed. College graduation rates for low-income students have stagnated. The poverty rate is as high as it was in 1981. Median household income is lower than it was in 1998.\n\n\"If we just keep funding social programs the way we have been,\" Mr. Baron says, \"there's not a lot of reason to think we'll have much success.\"\n\nThe Obama administration's seven pilot programs would create bonds for, among other areas, job training, education, juvenile justice and care of children's disabilities. Nonprofit groups like Social Finance could apply. So could for-profit companies, said the White House official, who asked not to be named because the president had not yet released next year's budget. The $100 million for the bonds would come out of the budgets of other programs, to stay consistent with Mr. Obama's announced freeze on non-security spending.\n\nOfficials in Massachusetts and New York are looking at similar ideas but have not yet decided whether they will issue bonds.\n\nBeyond the impact of any single program, the bonds have the potential to nudge all government agencies to pay more attention to results. Mr. Obama, after all, campaigned as a reformer who wanted to create a sleek, efficient \"iPod government.\" He has had some success, like the expansion of a program — backed by years of solid evidence — in which nurses go to the homes of new at-risk parents to counsel them.\n\nOver all, though, the administration has not done enough to improve government efficiency. Put it this way: If someone asked you how Mr. Obama had made government work better, would you have an answer?\n\nMaking government work better will be all the more important in the years ahead. The free market is not going to solve many of our biggest problems, be it stagnant pay or spotty medical care. And government — in Washington and locally — is going to be financially squeezed for a long time.\n\nThere never was a good excuse for wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that didn't work. But now, especially, there's no excuse."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032953.txt_15342
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032953.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Fair ..and you?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Where?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "1/8/2017 9:31:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "new york"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt_15347
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<________________________>"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": "<________________________>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry that is for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2017 11:13:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "like always .. it was pleasure and fun to visit you. thnx for the nice giftc14"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033075.txt_15376
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033075.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 2:35:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i like him iknow him"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I went to the trump mar a lago speech trump gave Saturday he isn’t kidding about a trade war he said we have\nnothing to loose because we are already loosing he used the example of Indian motorbikes coming into the us\nand India charges 125 percent for Harley’s quite frankly I wouldn’t ride an Indian motorbike if you paid me\nand 99 .9 percent of Indians can’t afford a Harley belt buckle .last night went to James cohens house a palace\nhe is s nice guy we had a long talk he sold Hudson news and now into multi family housing we should get\n\ntogether for lunch I am going to get to know him better best stay well jonathan\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026055.txt_15379
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026055.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Valeria Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "are you guys enjoying the warm"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI arrived from Brazil on January 19th, knowing that I had to remember something very important on January 20th and it was not Trump's inauguration. As I arrived too tired, I kept thinking, but could not remember. Just now seeing your e-mail I remembered what it was!!! Your birthday!!! Please accept our best wishes for your new year!\n\nHope you had a good celebration!\n\nWe had to postpone our trip to Arizona and are still in Cambridge, leaving on Wednesday. Noam and I hope to see you again soon and have a toast for your birthday.\n\nValeria"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Valeria Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Shame . I was there all day yesterday . Everything ok I hope"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/23/2017 1:44:28 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Oh, no.\n\nWe will have to compensate for it. Noam has been racing for finishing some work before we leave, and I have been packing. But we'll find opportunities while in Arizona. Do you have plans to be there soon?\n\nValeria"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt_15385
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here goes:\n\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\n\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\n\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\n\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\n\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 5:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Darren Indyke ];\n\nSeems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026041.txt_15386
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026041.txt
subject:
  Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)

messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Schulte <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 December 2016 at 8:35:35 AM HKT", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Sure. Forward"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "See the attached. Let me know if you are interested in meeting him when he’s in NYC.\n\ngino"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 Dec 2016, at 6:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "no ,. how are you?"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2016 12:35:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Good. Sorting out Tulum at the moment. Over 40 people wanted to come. The Cenote project didn’t get\nfunded yet so we are sorting out accommodations. David Sauvage who you met is coming\n(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zebYOwGi_vn1 WpUnkTR1T7yPsl-iQIfA9GidDUg0zcU/edit). Joon\nYun as well (who Id like to introduce you to - http://www.drjoonyun.com/). The gathering will help plan\nactivities in 2017 which I will summarise for you in Jan.\n\nOn Monday, I head to Pragelato with the wife and kids for 10 days of skiing and sight-seeing. Head to Tulum\non the Ist. I will be at DLD and Davos afterward. I still have a Vive that I got for you that I’d like to set up and\nwalk you and your people through.\n\nIs your schedule for the holidays sorted?\n\nHappy Holidays!!\n\ngino"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt_15387
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:31:20 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011959.txt_15391
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011959.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jolanta MODILINOS", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "15/10/2014 4:46 PM (GMT+02:00)", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Jean Luc,\n\nHope that you stay fine.\n\nAs per our conversation about placement of her with you in NYC and Miami, she said she found\nsome article in internet , which changed her position and she preferred to be placed with another\nagency..\n\nlam so sorry, but people believes in media more than in us sometimes, what is sad!\n\nWarmest regards\n\nJolanta Sadauskiene"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548.txt_15405
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548.txt
subject: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Edward Epstein", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 1:23:10 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Hi Jeff\nI thought this might interest you\n\nThe 2016 presidential campaign was marked by three disclosure operations, all of which appear to\nhave had a single author. “Oppo research” is the euphemism commonly used in elections for such\noperations. The mechanism is fairly simple: dirt is obtained from wherever it can be found to\ndiscredit an opponent. It is then “leaked,” usually either anonymously or on background, to targeted\nmedia channels. What makes the 2016 campaign particularly interesting from a counterintelligence\nperspective is not that both sides had their own disclosure operations, but that both sides were\noffered the dirt for them by a common source: Russian intelligence.\n\nAs we now know from the emails of Donald Trump Jr., a thinly veiled intermediary, Natalya\nVeselnitskaya, offered the Trump campaign documents that putatively would show that Hillary\nClinton had received illegal donations from Russian financiers; in the event, no such documents\nwere proffered. But it is a reasonable assumption that Veselnitskaya could not have made such an\noffer, especially in a meeting attended by three other Russians, unless the move was approved by\nthe FSB, the Russian security service.\n\nA second disclosure operation, this one involving supporters of the Clinton campaign, was more\nlayered. The proximate intermediary was Fusion GPS, a research firm used by the law firm Baker\nHostetler, and the secondary “cut-out” was the British firm Orbis, co-founded by former MI-6\nofficer Christopher Steele. We know something about this sub-contractor from the depositions\nSteele gave in defending a libel suit in London. According to Steele, Fusion GPS not only had him\nprepare the so-called “dossier” on Trump but also directed Steele to “leak” it to specified reporters\nat Mother Jones, Yahoo, the New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Yorker, and CNN. In\nsome cases, Steele was directed to brief the selected journalists personally. The dirt in these “leaks”\nrelied heavily on information supplied by two Russian government sources: Source A, whom Steele\ncalls “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure”; and Source B, “a former top-level intelligence\nofficer still active in the Kremlin.” Sources A and B provided information supposedly exposing a\nlong-time Russian FSB operation to get compromising information that could be used to control\nTrump. The idea that two Russian intelligence sources would reveal a long-time Kremlin-backed\nFSB operation bears further examination."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt_15419
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt
subject: prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/11/2013 5:45:09 PM", "subject": "prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030414.txt_15421
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030414.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“lve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity\nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 17:48:01 2011", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: <no subject>", "body": "Call ne"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt_15422
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031343.txt_15427
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031343.txt
subject:
  The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump’s Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him

messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [ii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 7:25:25 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump’s Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him", "body": "He is crazy!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt_15429
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt
subject: Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 10:59:39 AM EST", "subject": "US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "The US team is out with their 2017 Year Ahead this morning (link) running through ALL sub-sectors with each analysts top pick into the new year. op Picks — ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA Washington DC Backdrop Given the clean sweep by the GOP & uncertainty around the ACA, key attention is paid by Andy Bressler to a review of the various scenarios that could play out early next year. With a repeal likely to happen well before a replace (essentially via the Budget Reconciliation process in Jan/Feb), Andy notes this is likely to include a repeal of both health insurance exchange subsidies & a phase-down of Medicaid expansion funding (albeit with a two or three year transition period). He also expects a repeal of many of the larger HC related taxes in the ACA, including the HIX ($14.3bn in 2018), Medtech Tax (2.3%), pharma industry tax ($4.1bn in 2018) & Cadillac tax (effective 2020). As for the views by analysts... Biotech (+) — believe sector will outperform largely as pricing risk has diminished (although will remain in pockets) but pipelines/growth remains. Ying's top picks are CELG & REGN; Tazeen's top picks are kCAD & RARE. Spec Pharma (-) — headwinds remain w/ Sumant's top pick AGN given lower risk to reimbursement pressures & an underappreciated pipeline. Leverage & CF remain the key focus for investors. Tools/Animal Health (=) — Derik notes more \"headline\" than \"real\" risks from policy which will create opportunities for a group growing MSD, although valuations remain above peers. (US 1 name) top pick, also A, ZTS in Animal Health, in Diagnostics & in Services. Medtech (=) — Hopkins' expects a mixed bag in 2017 w/ stocks trading close to 5yr valuation lows; EW top pick given best growth / purest innovation story. Facilities (-) — Fischbeck notes that uncertainty will remain an overhang for hospitals as repeal/replace a negative for the group (est losing 2-3mm Medicaid lives & 2-3mm exchange lives would be a 1-2% EBITDA hit on avg). Focus on company-specific stories like MCOs (+) — Fischbeck generally +ve under Trump (especially around MA given historical support from GOP) w/ tailwinds from corporate tax & rising rates. top pick in given valuation & tailwinds. Distribution/Tech (=) — Valiquette prefers pharmacies ,,,'VS/WBA given benefits from decelerating generic prices (which will remain an overhang for Distributors). HHS appointment a —ve for HCIT."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:46:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "attached are equity healthcare ideas"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025926.txt_15430
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025926.txt
subject: RE: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Great one. Thanks"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Trump is a problem solver for sure."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about. Media holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She's shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I I love ole Bernie. Wish he wasn't a damn socialist. He probably reminds you of your Social Studies teacher from Lafayette high...?"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie's like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60's and 70's."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Epstein 2016!\n(Mark)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka <pk@princeconcepts.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["'jeffrey E.' [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "'Philip Kafka'"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:33:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Hey Jeff. PhiIly gets it. I told him about our first lesson in common sense: Folding the bottom tip of the French fry cone so it doesn't tear the paper bag at Nathans. Schmuck!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019388.txt_15438
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019388.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/18/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["New York"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/18/2006", "body": "From Miami\n\nFBI Miami\n\nAny questions or concerns contact sat Miami b6 -2"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030372.txt_15440
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030372.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2018 2:07:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Anders Corr", "recipients": ["Fanell Red", "Authoritarian Influence"], "timestamp": "August 8, 2018 at 5:32:57 AM EDT", "subject": "Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "From Reuters News:\n\nChina defends Iran business ties after Trump threat\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-china/china-defends-iran-business-ties-after-trump-threat-idUSKBNIKTOTU\n\nChina's business ties with Iran are open, transparent and lawful, its foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after U.S. President Donald Trump said companies doing business with Iran would be barred from the United States."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt_15442
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt_15443
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt
subject: RE: today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S <bkarp@paulweiss.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 15, 2017 2:51 PM", "subject": "today", "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 8:25:35 PM", "subject": "RE: today", "body": "Wow, call me naive, but that’s something."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt_15444
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt
subject: mission acomplished for some
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 13 2014 08:14 PM", "subject": "mission acomplished for some", "body": "Philanthropy — Full text articles\n\nRevealed: the world’s most admired people\nStephan Shakespeare — Times\n\nBill Gates is the most admired person in the world, according to a global survey for The Times by YouGov. The man who many\nsee as oe for the democratisation of computing and who is the biggest activist philanthropist across the globe is\n\nIn his home, America, he ranks only 5th, behind Pope Francis, President Obama, Billy Graham, and George W. Bush. Mr\nObama and the Pope have a strong lead in Western nations but Mr Gates is highly regarded in every country polled, from\nBrazil to Egypt, Nigeria to Indonesia, Britain to Russia to Australia. ee as respondents there said: “He\ngot into a good university, but gave up studying to start his business. He has become a rich man despite dropping out of school\n... He has a successful career and a caring heart — he is ordinary, but great.”\n\nThe Queen came highest in Britain and second in Australia, but didn’t make the Indian top ten. Nevertheless she is the most\nadmired woman in the world, in 17th place, closely followed by Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey.\n\nHalf of the top ten admired in Russia are women, including the pop singer Alla Pugacheva and the Queen. That is the highest\nfigure in all countries surveyed — women are strikingly under-represented.\n\nSome light is shed on this by comparing our results with a recent Gallup poll in America, which asked for most admired man\nand woman in separate questions. In that poll, Bill Clinton scored 2 per cent and Hillary Clinton 15. YouGov asked a single\nquestion, not differentiating men and women, and the two Clintons rated about the same. The two polls also show the power of\nthe media to direct public attention: Gallup polled early in December, and Pope Francis was “most admired” by only 4 per cent.\nBy the time of the YouGov survey, Time magazine had made him its Person of the Year, and he shot up to 21 per cent.\n\nBusiness leaders did well in general. YouGov puts Sir Richard Branson 4th in Britain, the Hong Kong billionaire Sir Li Kashing\nwas sixth in China; the Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote was third in his home country; Silvio Santos, a media billionaire,\nwas 4th in Brazil; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the tycoon recently freed by Vladimir Putin, was 8th in Russia; while Warren Buffett,\nwho is admired in India, Pakistan and China, was 8th in the world.\n\nActors and musicians do less well. With the exception of the Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan, Ms Jolie and Stephen\nFry, who confirms his enormous Twitter following by making 7th in Britain, just below Desmond Tutu. Johnny Depp and Brad\nPitt get close to the top in a couple of countries and Justin Bieber did well in Indonesia, but the rock star and anti-poverty\ncampaigner Bono is notable by his absence.\n\nSportsmen were more highly regarded, with the Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar 5th in the world — but only because he is so\nadored in the world’s second-most populous country. The footballer Lionel Messi had broader support, reaching 15th in the\nworld. In Britain, David Beckham squeaked into 10th place.\n\nIn only two countries of the 13 surveyed did no local politician make it into the top ten — Australia and the UK. The omission\nwas most striking in Britain where Nigel Farage, the top politician, was in 16th place. David Cameron received the “most\nadmired” accolade from only two people in a thousand. In Germany, Angela Merkel scored 65 times higher at 13 per cent,\nsecond only to the Pope. Vladimir Putin topped the Russian poll with a whopping 24 per cent, Nicolas Sarkozy was third in\nFrance and Goodluck Jonathan 8th in Nigeria. Edward Snowden, responsible for leaking classified documents that revealed\nthe extent of surveillance by America’s National Security Agency, was 10th most admired in the country that granted him\nasylum, Russia. He also showed strongly in Germany. We also asked who was the most famous person in the world. The"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt_15445
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt
subject: Re: Great seeing you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel, \nIt was great seeing you. Hope to see you on my next trip which is every other week. Let me know when Andrew Lucasi is coming to \ntown."}, {"sender": "<_________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with \nAndy re: his trip here from California. \nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional \ninterest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain \nprice. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's \ndepressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest. \nLook forward to hearing from you. \nJoel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/6/2010 1:03:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. i will pick up all \ncosts. thanks,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt_15446
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt
subject: Re: Small biz and Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:30:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "foot off the brake"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "It's getting better\n\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n\n110\nloo tOtsiNik\\\n90\n80 1,86:\nI I I I I I I I I I\n2000\n\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted.\n16\nCNBC\n\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed\noff about regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke.\nThey really dig him down there....\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt_15458
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt
subject: Re: [External]
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:50:43 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "https://www.washinetonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/03/new-trump-book-bannons-treasonous-claim-\nivankas-presidential-ambitions-and-melanias-first-lady-concerns/?utm_term=.17d17352bla4"}, {"sender": "Melanie Spinclla", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "We cannot print it since we don’t subscribe"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:31 PM", "subject": "[External]", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032760.txt_15472
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032760.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhsoffice>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 2:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Opinions", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 25, 2018, at 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We are here at martins"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 5:25:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it till when ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt_15473
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me.\n\nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I’ll send that along your way.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nThanks,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026096.txt_15474
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:36:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Exercising call me in hour thank u"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032774.txt_15492
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032774.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken", "Michael"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken - Michael , Michael/ Ken"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Ken"], "timestamp": "May 19, 2018, at 1:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "delighted to meet. Jeffrey has long told me about your friendship and the respect he has for you. If you send me your mailing address, it would be my pleasure to send you my recent book about the Trump White House. I'm now at work on a sequel focusing on the legal case against Trump and Trump's response to it. Any counsel and background you might provide would aid me enormously and enrich the book. I, of course, would be willing to talk with you on an entirely off-the-record basis or under any arrangement that suits. Thanks in advance and I look forward to the chance to chat. All best, Michael"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 8:25:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Michael: Excellent. With thanks to Jeffrey, I'm delighted to come into your orbit, and look forward to our conversation. My mailing address is:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt_15495
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt
subject: Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:53:05 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Oy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 22, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "whoops"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Reid Weingarten"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid, \n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague, \nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining \noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior \nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if \nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record, \njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm at or my desk is \n\nThanks, \n\nAshley"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012.txt_15501
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012.txt
subject: Reminder: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2019 12:46:27 PM", "subject": "Reminder: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?", "body": "Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?\nIn July 1915, Hussein ibn 'Ali, the Sherif of Mecca, sent a letter to Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, informing him of the terms for Arab participation in the war against the Turks. The letters between Hussein and Mac-Mahon that followed outlined the areas that Britain was prepared to cede to the Arabs in exchange for their help."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016693.txt_15512
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016693.txt
subject: Re: Trump house
messages:
  [{"sender": "MM", "recipients": ["JP"], "timestamp": "11/19/2008 07:43 AM", "subject": "Trump house", "body": "JP: Can you provide the # address for the old Gosman/Trump house on North Ocean Boulevard?"}, {"sender": "John Page", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:54:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump house", "body": "Mayor: The address you want is: 515 North County Road. (NOT North Ocean Blvd.) JP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt_15514
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 11:45:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of\ndetails where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has\nlots of traction"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030654.txt_15517
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030654.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/21/2017 2:33:52 PM", "subject": "", "body": "How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere \nImportance: High \nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIMzSf0VwEk&sns=em"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021759.txt_15522
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021759.txt
subject: Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Jun 20, 2009, at 4:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "Hi, Jeffrey,\n\nI hope the Radar Online report today (Friday 6-19) that you are to be released early is correct!\n\nBest wishes,\n\nDavid\n\nReferencing:\nhttp://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/06/exclusive-jeffrey-epstein-be-released-prison-early"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "30 days\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, June 23 2009 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news/content/news/2009/06/23/webepstein062309.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026036.txt_15525
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026036.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)

messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Schulte", "recipients": ["Paul Schulte"], "timestamp": "12 December 2016 at 4:10:08 PM GMT+8", "subject": "Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "SCHULTE RESEARCH REPORT: ED 164\n.41114\nDEEP DIVES INTO PRC FIN TECH OWNERSHIP AND TRUMP\nCABINET OWNERSHIP. (DO NOT FORWARD)\n12 December 2016\nED 164\n• H SHARES: PING AN, CICC AT CENTER OF ALIBABA, TENCENT\nPHENOMENON. BUY. SELL AIA.\n• TRUMP CHOICES ARE ALL ABOUT KOCH BROS & OIL/GAS\nNETWORK: BUY RUSSIA... ALSO SAUDI BANKS.\n• INVESTOR FEEDBACK: INFLATION COMING. BUY BOMBED\nOUT BANKS HSBC, KB, UNICREDIT? GROWING AGREEMENT ON\nBOOM IN US. BUY CITI, JPM.\nSchulte Research Report, ED 164: Slides\n\n1. Ping An & CICC are the 2 H shares that operate in the middle of Alibaba, Tencent, Lufax.\nA. The chart below represents a deep dive we did on the new world of Chinese banking. Companies\nlike Zhong An, WeBank and Lufax will grow dramatically and will take advantage of (as well as\nsupport) the massive worlds of Alibaba and Tencent. Together, Alibaba and Tencent have market cap\nof $500 bn. Popping up in many of these areas of overlap are Ping An and CICC. They are\nstrategically placed to make great strides in China. This is slowly being recognized in the case of Ping\nAN (See Page 8 of attached PPT). Ping An's market cap is $97 bn. It is connected to Zhong An.. It\nowns 44% of Lufax. And some if its management were the very ones that started WeBank. It is\nperfectly positioned for the coming boom in new banking. It has the best combined ROA and ROE\nglobally and its P/E of 10x is trading on a 50% discount to the global averages. Why is Ping An\ntrading at a discount to AIA? BUY PING AN -- SELL AIA..\nB. The other company which has the best return on capital of any broker dealer -- and is also\npositioned nicely for the coming boom in the new era of banking in China -- is CICC. CICC and CDH\n(a CICC breakaway) both invested in Zhong An and Lufax. CICC has vision and a proven track record.\nYet it has been a laggard. This is a top pick for H shares for China in 2017. The other bank with great\nvision in this area is CCB, which has invested in Ant Financial. BUY H shares CCB and CICC. (See\nattached PPT for portfolios and China fintech details).\nC. IPOs in 2017. I think Zhong An will be a surprise for 2017 in the Hong Kong market. Its market\ncap is expected to be $10 bn and it has interesting potential in so many areas of insurance. It\nremains an insurance company whose marginal cost of a new customer is zero. It has a talented\nteam of 900 engineers and has new Al and blockchain divisions. It is rolling out an impressive array\nof products including corporate solutions for insurance and investment plans. Lufax CEO Greg Gibb\nmade a big splash at the Finnovasia (Schulte Research co-sponsored it) in Hong Kong last month.\nThe company is a diversified financial conglomerate akin to \"Schwab meets etrade and Fidelity\" --\nonly 25 years ago. It needs an IPO north of $25 bn in order for the private equity partners to make\nmoney. Lastly, Ant Financial will come to the market for a $60 bn IPO in 2017 -- also in Hong Kong.\nThis is a mothership company that goes to the heart of China's system. Its early investors are CIC,\nCDB, CCB, China Life and other vital organs of the system. It will not be allowed to fail. There are\nsome questions about whether to own this through Alibaba, since Alibaba will own 33% of Ant post\nIPO. I'm in this camp. Buy Alibaba on this pullback. (See attached PPT for the full China Fintech\nReport).\n2. Koch Industries saturates both the offices of Trump as well as Pence. Mega bullish for Russia, oil\nand gas companies. Mega bearish for alternative energy.\nA. The Koch Brothers are not just two grumpy men -- they are a political party. Koch Industries is the\nsecond biggest private company in the US after Cargill. They operate public and secretive political\nentities in 32 states and dole out more than $500 million each political cycle to various entities in the\nstrongest places. The political entities employ more than 1,200 people and the amount of donations\navailable to right wing causes varies dramatically but is as high as $750 million per cycle. It is the\nthird largest party in the US after the Democratic and Republican party. It controls the Libre Alliance,\nAmericans for Prosperity, Freedom Partners, Institute for Energy Research, American Energy Alliance\nand Concerned Veterans.\nB. What do they do with their money? They support right wing Republican candidates for all\norganizations -- attorneys general, Senate, House and state political figures. This is where it gets\ninteresting. Freedom Partners is thought of as the \"Koch bank\". Guess who ran this? Marc Short. It\ncontrols about $250 mn in funds for political activity. Guess who employed Marc Short as chief of\nstaff? Indiana Governor Mike Pence. Guess who then employed him as chief of staff? President-elect\nTrump. Matt Lloyd is in charge of communications and strategy for VP-elect Pence -- he came from\nKoch Industries. Governor Pence was a frequent attendee of the secretive semi-annual meetings of\nthe Koch Brothers. Guess who raised more than $100 million for Freedom Partners? Don McGahn.\nGuess who is the new White House Counsel for President-elect Trump? Don McGahn. (McGahn was\nembroiled in the Tom Delay scandal in the 2000s). Guess who had two companies which had Koch\nBrothers as investors and whose chief of staff (Chenowith) came from the Koch world? The new CIA-\ndesignate chief Mike Pompeo. (Pompeo's Kansas campaign received a $900,000 donation from Koch).\nGuess who gave $1 mn to Americans for Prosperity? Education secretary designate Betsy Devos.\nGuess who has written the strategy paper for the Department of Energy transition? Tom Pyle -- He is\naffiliated with the Koch Industries Office of federal Affairs and the Institute for Energy Research.\nGuess who was caught up in a Koch Industries scandal for a petrochemical port project (with a Koch\naffiliated Messr. Henneberry)? Governor Nikki Haley who is UN Ambassador designate.\nC. Advisors are ALL Koch-related. Here is where it gets fun. Former campaign advisor Corey\nLewandowski came from KochLand. Rebekah Mercer is part of Koch and and gave $2.5 mn to\nFreedom Partners. Kellyanne Conway has connections to Pence from way back and is connected to\nSteve Bannon through the Center for National Policy. Trump deputy campaign manager David Bossie\ncame from Citizens United. The Director of Coalitions for Trump is named Alan Cobb -- he came from\nAmericans for Prosperity. Daren Se!nick is a transition advisor and he came from Concerned\nVeterans. Others on the Trump team who came from Kochland include Stuart Jolly, Eli Miller, Scott\nHagerstrom and Matt Ciepielowski.\n3. BUY the hell out of Russia -- Exxon Rex is a cabinet trifecta for Koch Brothers.\nA. And there's Exxon Rex. Any contribution from Exxon received money from Koch -- and vice versa.\nRex Tillerson is worth $151 million and is leaving Exxon next year. He seems to have accepted\nsecretary of state position. He inked a deal worth $300 billion in oil and gas exploration in 2012. (For\nthat, he received the highest civilian honour bestowed by Russia). This will be a boom for Koch\nIndustries as the sanctions against Russia are lifted. (Thank you Uncle Vlad for interfering in the\nelections). This will be a boom for Russia -- for equities, FX and bonds. It is clear that sanctions\nagainst Russia will be lifted regardless of whether Russia interfered in the elections. (Clinton made\nthis a campaign issue and still lost!).\nB. Anyone who thinks this will be reversed by Greenpeace or other green organization is kidding\nthemselves. The Senate and House is Republican. Majority parties control all committees so they\ncontrol the agenda. The agenda is set. These guys are geniuses with the news cycle. And the vast\narray of think tanks controlled by the Koch Brothers (most of them) allows them to control the news\ncycle as well as the opinion pages of newspapers. The web on control on public opinion from the\nKoch Brothers reaches every newspaper through a large array of think tanks like the AEI and Cato\nInstitute, not to mention the vast array of Koch think tanks.\nC. If you don't like this, tough luck. Life is not fair. This is not going to be reversed. Think of it as\nwatching a science experiment. Bush lost the popular vote to Gore in 2001 and completely reversed\npolicies on tax, environment, Middle East, energy, fracking, birth control, and LGBT issues. Trump,\nPence, Bannon and Koch will make a deal which will be a hybrid of religious right on moral issues and\n\"zero intrusion from government\" in commerce. Republicans already control the Senate, the House, a\nmajority of governorships as well as a majority of attorneys general. It will be very hard to reverse\nthis. And if Trump can deliver jobs to the midwest red states, more senate seats will turn red. Tom\nPyle's list of things to for the Department of Energy's transition team is expressly designed to do this.\nThis includes new oil and gas leasing projects, more fracking, more coal, more LNG projects -- and a\ngreen light for both the Keystone and Dakota pipelines. The working paper reneges on the Paris pact,\nthe Clean Power Plan and the carbon tax. And it is expressly a climate change denial policy. States\nlike North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Iowa, Texas, Louisiana, West Virginia, Kansas and\nothers will come to life again.. Most of these states have small populations but each gets a governor\nand two senators.\nCONTACT US\nPaul Schulte\nFounder, Schulte Research\nGavin Liu\nSenior Analyst\nIND-X Advisors Limited\nKinwick Centre, 8th Floor\n32 Hollywood Road\nCentral\nHong Kong"}, {"sender": "Paul Schulte", "recipients": ["Gino Yu"], "timestamp": "16 Dec 2016, at 6:19 PM", "subject": "Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Founder and Editor\nSchulte Research"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": ["Paul Schulte"], "timestamp": "17 Dec 2016, at 3:09 AM", "subject": "Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "I'm Still in HK. Cancelled my India trip. Leaving for Italy on Monday. Can meet this weekend if you are\naround.\nCan I forward this to my benefactor in NYC? You interested in meeting him while you are there?\ngino"}, {"sender": "Paul Schulte", "recipients": ["Gino Yu"], "timestamp": "17 December 2016 at 8:35:35 AM HKT", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Sure. Forward\nFounder and Editor\nSchulte Research"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2016 2:43:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "See the attached. Let me know if you are interested in meeting him when he's in NYC.\ngino"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.txt_15530
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.txt
subject: Re: raw text
messages:
  [{"sender": "Scott Denett", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM", "subject": "raw text", "body": "According to Friday's NY Post Jeffrey Epstein returned to New York City \"making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an underage girl\". \"I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender,' \" the Wall Street hedge fund manager told The Post. \"It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel,\" said Epstein. Well that's not exactly the correct analogy... Not only are Epstein's comments brazen, they are arrogant and self-implicating. By telling a reporter \"I'm an offender\", he seems to be admitting guilt. Which brings me to the big question of the day. Why did Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan D.A., allow a Level 3 sex offender (the most dangerous kind) to reside -- even for ten minutes -- in a house that is right next to Central Park and a school? Isn't that unlawful given the housing guidelines for sex offenders? According to the NYPost, Epstein's Level 3 designation means that he is at \"high risk\" to repeat his offense and poses \"a threat to public safety.\" When I rang Vance (twice) to discuss Epstein's residential guidelines he did not take my calls."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Apr 3, 2011, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: raw text", "body": "Scott was able to send me the attachments below but there are no highlights. Darren, if you want to call me and read me the highlights, I can type them on a Word Doc as you dictate...(?) (Even when Scott opened them on his end he had no highlights)"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:54:56 -0400", "subject": "Re: raw text", "body": "I also could only open 1st doe and don't have Je's highlights from the other does."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: raw text", "body": "Ok. So if you would like orMto call me and possibly they could read off to me."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 07:15 PM", "subject": "Re: raw text", "body": "try opening in firefox"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032633.txt_15532
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032633.txt
subject: Got another call from Connelly..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/27/2017 2:47:47 PM", "subject": "Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was\nasking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea -- I think he is\ndoing some Trump-related digging too.\n\nAnyway, for what its worth..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023356.txt_15537
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023356.txt
subject: agenda for today 5 pm?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spine! i"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:36 PM", "subject": "agenda for today 5 pm?", "body": "1. put someone on asap to ascertain if she is still in london. 2. set up conference will uk criminal and uk\ncounsel. a give them more facts. 3. choose method of message delivery. my choice. - two highly\nrespected former ---- fillin the blank, immigration, scotland yard. sfo. . who may knock on her door and\npresent the terms. 4 if not. an alternative method. 5. Is it possible to find out if she has gone to\nauthorities? tabloid lawyer. 6. have the same types of individuals availble in new york if she decides to return\nas stated.. i prefer former fbi, or immigration one man one woman. .7 from opening a DA investigation to\narrest. how long? 8, can we open a file in either jurisdiction, and maintain confidentiality."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spine! i", "Brad S Karp iS"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:48 PM", "subject": "Re: agenda for today 5 pm?", "body": "lets set a time to speak today if possible . 30 minutes or so. my schedule is tight"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:07 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "I think that Melanie should set up a separate email account for this correspondence. she currently is on an\napollo server.\n\nThere is not even a good solution . all have substantial risks. we are dealing with a wholly unpredictable and\nbad minded person. I and Brad can only make suggestions/actions each less than stellar. - that being\n\nsaid we should do our best to have all the facts . options etc. and to distinguish fact from opionion As the\nconsequences of any decision is likely to have some very bad parts , Leon needs to be cognizant of as much as\nthe downside as we can adequately foresee."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Po"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "agenda for today 5 pm?", "body": "jan 2 of this year"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "agenda for today 5 pm?", "body": "Leon, I decided last week that there was little or no upside in disturbing your well earned holiday especiaily as\nyou seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc.\nhowever the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last\ndays of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs , old stock\nsales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same\n,topco midco.ete still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no\ncare for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens\naudit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to\ndiscuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you\nleft. asisaid before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't\nwork for me but works for you. . I tried."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella TT"], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "agenda for today 5 pm?", "body": "jeffrey\n\nBrad Wechsler is asking if you could meet for a half hour with him and Rich Joslin to discuss Use Tax\nRefund. Below are available dates/times...below that is your schedule. OK for me to schedule in?:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031196.txt_15539
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031196.txt
subject:
  ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Brad Edwards", "\"Gary H. — i  d"], "timestamp": "January 27, 2016 at 11:57:38 AM EST", "subject": "ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": "HI BRAD\nPLEASE CONSIDER WISDOM IN THE YEARS OF LITIGATION AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN .\n\n1 ST THOMAS HAS THE MAJOR BENEFIT BY THE ATTACHMENT OF ALL THE JEFF EPSTEIN & CLIENTS ASSETS IN THE EPSTEIN OPERATIONS ON ST THOMAS .\n\n2 EPSTEIN IS NOW THE COLLECTION PROCEEDING UNDER THE FEDERAL & ST THOMAS LAW .\n\n3 EPSTEIN HAS THE WRONG PERSON AS THE ST THOMAS AGENT FOR EPSTEIN WHEREBY THE EPSTEIN ST THOMAS AGENT IS THE WIFE OF THE FORMER HEAD OF ST THOMAS NOT THE PARTY PERSON FROM THE LEADERSHIP IN ST THOMAS .\n\n4 EPSTEIN BACKED THE PARTY IN ST THOMAS THAT DID NOT WIN THE ST THOMAS RACE\n\n5 ST THOMAS NEEDS MONEY THAT THE ATTACHMENT OF THE EPSTEIN ASSETS ON ST THOMAS WILL PROVIDE AT ONCE.\n\n6 BANKS LENDING EPSTEIN & CLIENTS ALL OF THE MONEY FOR TRADING THE MARGIN ACCOUNTS MUST PUT EPSTEIN et al INTO BANKRUPTCY ONCE ST THOMAS MOVES AGAINST EPSTEIN & ALL OF THE ASSETS ON ST THOMAS THAT EPSTEIN WORKS WITH EVERY DAY .\n\n7 BRAD THE YEARS OF LITIGATION AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN ARE OVER WITH NO MAJOR COLLECTION FROM EPSTEIN IN THE PROCEEDINGS BRAD IS LITIGATING .\n\n8 BRAD CALL ATTORNEY ALAN FRAADE 212 486 2500 , TO JOIN THE ST THOMAS PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN .\n\nTHANK YOU BRAD"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023342.txt_15544
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023342.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "You have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully\nunwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would\nbe much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??!. Iam\nconcermed re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn\nACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are alla part. Barry will need 2 months\nto just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing\nrequirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into\nnew plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat\nsale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john\n.. Joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced with\nnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock\nsales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you\nCANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self\ninflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need\n3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you\nknow. He will need to be trained. note\n; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad\nthat you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after\nonly one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.\n\nI expect as a friend you will understand that\n\nI will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long\noverdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul\nweiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, , no one. needs toend.. you and I had\npreviously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can\nnot sayim surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you\nwont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge\n\nIf I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as Ihave said, I hope\nyou understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as\nto avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with\nyou , I find it very distasteful. . soto beclear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40\nmillion per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement. 5 million every 2 months\nthereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin ifi am able in January. I will immediately stop\nwork , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10\nmillion. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with\nprofessionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any\npainting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the\nhour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say.\n\nher the last two places. ?\n\nTo: Melanie Spinella\nLeon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS__, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked for a\nre-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the outrageous\nincompetence in your family office... Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by the office (sic)\nthat ... , BUT i was told by joslin,. , but I was told by. \" why is leon blaming me for...\" . I ve have always\ngiven you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe , had remarkable\nresults and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your office. , you\nhave repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , youtold me last week that the emotional reason was in order\nto be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring the benefit of between 1.5"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031800.txt_15575
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031800.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:04:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this is not a new phenomenon for him. in the past he was told not to come out of his apt. thats how he got through near personal bankruptcy. is strength is remarkable. he is pounded 24/7. I hope someone close to him gets indicted , but not sure, otherwise the pressure of the unkown will force him to do crazy things."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course. Who knows whether I’m serious? Not at this moment me.\n\nWill trump crack into insanity?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 7:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump - borderline insane. dersh, a few feet further from the border but not by much"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sent 45 minutes after she sent an outline.\n\nI had sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered him as well."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033277.txt_15577
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033277.txt
subject: Dershowitz On Special Counsel: The Investigation Should End « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2018 5:50:50 PM", "subject": "Dershowitz On Special Counsel: The Investigation Should End « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth", "body": "http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2018/03/29/dershowitz-trump-special-counsel-investigation-should-end-soviet-union/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025517.txt_15606
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025517.txt
subject: Fwd: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 7:39:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Alexander Marlow", "Adrienne Ross", "Oliver Lane", "Frances Martel"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'\n\nby THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.11 Mar 201.-\n\nAs Steve Bannon continues his tour of Europe, energizing the anti-establishment populist base, the mainstream media cannot help but admit their admiration for his abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. In this week's issue, the left-wing German weekly Stern articulates the greatest fear of the European establishment: that Bannon \"could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.\"\n\nMany thought that the reign of the \"Dark Lord\" had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon's adversaries had underestimated him, because he is \"as dangerous as ever,\" he confesses.\n\nKramper cannot conceal his respect for Bannon's ability to move a crowd. He was greeted by \"frenetic applause\" in his recent address before France's National Front party, Kramper writes, demonstrating his \"impressive potential,\" which the writer describes as \"dangerous.\"\n\nIn the mind of his audience, Bannon is something of a miracle-worker, Stamper notes, having \"done the impossible\" by bringing Donald Trump into the White House.\n\nThe reason Bannon is dangerous, Kramper continues, is because he \"lays out the political program of a worldwide right: He has already conquered the USA; now Europe and then the whole world will follow.\"\n\n\"You are part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary, bigger than all that,\" Bannon told French populists.\n\nBannon showed that he \"dominates the mood against the 'elites,' the 'establishment' and the 'perverse system' of greedy corporations and banks, and of course also against the press, which is led around 'like a dog on the Leash,\" Stamper writes.\n\nAnd now he Mr. Bannon setting himself up as an instigator, if not an outright shepherd, of a movement that crosses borders, languages and parties.\n\n\"Bannon is a master of apocalyptic rhetoric,\" Stamper continues, effortlessly weaving together nationalist interests with an international populist movement.\n\nThe American strategist showed his \"true caliber\" by expounding modern methods of political freedom through blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, Stamper said, leaving many of his hearers behind. Bannon has demonstrated that if the right wants to rule the future, \"it must dominate modern themes and rhetorically position them,\" he added.\n\nAspiring to be far more than an uncle who tells stories to his nephews of how he won the fight for the White House, Stamper writes, \"Bannon wants to become the super godfather of the international right.\"\n\nAlthough Bannon often looks a bit disheveled, \"he should not be underestimated,\" the writer warns. Past business partners attribute impressive \"strategic foresight\" to the eccentric tactician, saying he was often \"three or four steps ahead\" of his opponents in business. Because of his phenomenal memory, his nickname is \"the encyclopedia,\" Stamper notes with a certain reverence, and in his speeches he will spontaneously cite \"forgotten thinkers, known only to a handful of specialists.\"\n\n\"Bannon brings with him exclusive knowledge of power from the very heart of power,\" Stamper writes, which he will bring to bear on Europe's fragmented populist populism.\n\nAccording to Stamper, Bannon has established his \"European headquarters\" in Italy, from where he intends to galvanize European populists.\n\nThe Italian political situation is completely to his liking, Stamper declares, with a political landscape \"dominated by populists, right-wing ideologues and the political puppeteer Berlusconi.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033505.txt_15611
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033505.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo iii going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\n\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031814.txt_15616
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031814.txt
subject: Re: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn <q"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett <r", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\n\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett a >"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Ive had enough!!!!|_ Which puts ????"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The\nstock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding\nmergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we\nhopefully get more clarity from management."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023418.txt_15617
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023418.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "try to get a good night sleep. see you sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will try."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 2:37:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Did you read David Brooks today?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021646.txt_15623
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021646.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 12/08/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["tnternational@berat ions"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 12/08/2008", "body": "LEAD (s):\nSet Lead 1: (Info)\nALL RECEIVING OFFICES\n\nRead and clear."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt_15626
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt
subject: Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2018 6:23:09 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026243.txt_15629
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026243.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2018 2:25:40 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Yeah sure... am sure the republicans who sent a criminal referral for the brit spy who did the dossier will want to see trump lies"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 12, 2018 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Senate subpoena?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sri Emanuel is going to go s tv series"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think he is cracking"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 12, 2018 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don’t you dare say to anyone (or even think) “finally | agree with something he said”......"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-bannon-lawyers-up-russia-investigators-ready-to-pounce"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031627.txt_15637
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031627.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon PY", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon PY"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 2:26:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "number"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the\nsecondary market... blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in\nseparate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up\nin lock ups."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been\neffecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of\ntheir cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas.\nMaybe some people to talk to?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very\nuseful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in\naddition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio\ntech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members ofa\ntribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or\nthe very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a\nmessage needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,\n\nsocial media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing\nfood , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and\nreality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\n\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france\nthat revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the\namericans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women\ndrive. not the saudis"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033288.txt_15641
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033288.txt
subject: trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2016 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "trump", "body": "your call was remarkable..\n\nhttps://mediarelations.gwu.edu/americans-overwhelmingly-engaged-2016-election-tone-race-affecting-voters-new-gw-battleground-pol1"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032828.txt_15647
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032828.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2018 12:30:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He was in good form. Thinks Trump is fucked. But likely that the Dems will screw it up too."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032448.txt_15653
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032448.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruernn|er lr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/31/2017 2:49:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am at dinner with a NYT reporter and have been talking to half of the press universe. Trump just declared war\non DOJ. Bad, bad move."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2017, at 9:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump fired yates"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032238.txt_15654
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032238.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:44:47 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt_15659
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt
subject: Chatter
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2016 11:57:08 PM", "subject": "Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030683.txt_15662
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030683.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 4:47:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021956.txt_15663
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021956.txt
subject: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not \nhave press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on \ncell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I \ncan't just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found \nme and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with \nsomething really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, \nbeen working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I \nwas getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working \nfor a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. \nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm \nnot prepared for this."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Wow. \nI haven't seen her in months but we are friendly and I can try to find out more if you want. Let me know..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt_15676
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt
subject:
  Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 3:36:08 AM", "subject": "Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt_15678
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted ; Roy Black Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "j"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf? \nMy number is ____________ phone. \nThank you in advance. \nDavid Ingram correspondent Reuters News"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025945.txt_15681
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025945.txt
subject: Re: Locate a Clinical Trial Near You - MyClinicalTriallocator.com
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Locate a Clinical Trial Near You - MyClinicalTriallocator.com", "body": "This is Aaron's website not an app it allows anyone to type in any cancer term and find any clinical trial or researcher worldwide. It is updated every 24 hours and is in process of being updated with additional information for the benefit of patients and researchers. We allow it as a free open platform that can be expanded to specific interests. If for instance you type in glioblastoma and go out 10,000 miles from your location you can see researchers and clinical trials worldwide. Look at the map then press for example\n\nGermany and see what is available.\nhttp://www.myclinicaltriallocator.com/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 30, 2016, at 2:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Locate a Clinical Trial Near You - MyClinicalTriallocator.com", "body": "sent to biden private"}, {"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 6:26:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Locate a Clinical Trial Near You - MyClinicalTriallocator.com", "body": "Thank you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026294.txt_15689
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026294.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<a>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you are in NY , maybe i visit in september\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now where is my friend?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2018, at 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2018 5:34:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was told that GCC leaders will meet Trump on or around sep 5 .. 1 hope this dispute comes to an ending\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032562.txt_15692
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032562.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 9, 2017 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/09/us/politics/paul-manafort-home-search-mueller.html?hp=undefined&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&auth=login-email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/9/2017 10:37:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "North Korean response to trump is rational,. Accurate anmd really scary"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032312.txt_15694
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032312.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI was prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I’m so disgusted by the outrage over “grab them by the pussy” that I may give him my sympathy vote.\n\nI’m sure Bill C said things, too.\n\nAndres"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 4:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no good choice. how are u"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 9:30:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Either one I guess. Just came back from Ireland where I have a show called \"Torture.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030873.txt_15695
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030873.txt
subject: Fwd: How's it looking...?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, 8 Oct 2017 09:42:39 -0400", "subject": "How's it looking...? ", "body": "lemme know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: How's it looking...? ", "body": "I'm in CT w/ donors to my revolution now all day...can we meet tomorrow?\n\nSent via BlackBerry by AT&T"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Oct 8, 2017, at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: How's it looking...? ", "body": "Sure. Give me a target window?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: How's it looking...? ", "body": "Did u see prince in nyt and djt tweets on corker???"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Oct 8, 2017, at 10:53 AM", "subject": "Re: How's it looking...? ", "body": "JE leaves for Paris tomorrow at 9:30AM. Could meet before or tonight."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re: How's it looking...? ", "body": "Can't make tomorrow\nCan we resked for when he returns"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2017 1:18:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: How's it looking...? ", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032474.txt_15696
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032474.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michacl Wola", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT called me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I wonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and that I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy Ruemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michacl Wola"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle 0 some of the mess at the moment. everyone lawyering up in wash."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolf", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:31:07 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, You mentioned you were friends with Tom Barrack and I wondered if you might introduce me to him. As discussed, I'm doing a book on the first 100 days of the Trump White House--POTUS and key staff know all about it and are cooperating--and would love to chat with Tom on or off the record. Thanks in advance and look forward to seeing you soon. All best, Michael"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032204.txt_15697
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032204.txt
subject: ass.dads -- 2019/06/01
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["Multiple Senders"], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 11:36:57 AM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "trump coming to londong will be crazy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 11:48:33 AM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "When ?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 11:49:49 AM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "mon"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 11:54:45 AM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "I m leaving monday"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 12:48:09 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Good"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 01:40:43 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Should i come to you, or wait for you here ?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 02:29:42 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Wait drive new car"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 08:35:25 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Ok, i talked to dasha she said that NEXT week will be a lot of model in milan because of the season"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 08:35:55 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "I met with another , i dont know if you remember cute one but super shy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 08:36:09 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "She 11 be in Paris mid of the month"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 08:49:07 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "You 11 be able to meet her if you want"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 09:10:59 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "06/01/2019 09:52:52 PM", "subject": "ass.dads -- 2019/06/01", "body": "Let me know if you want me to go there and meet them there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032800.txt_15706
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032800.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tim Zagat", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 4:16:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI'm sending you a copy of House of Trump, House of Putin in case you haven't already received 10.\nWhen are you available to get together?\n\n- Tim"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031169.txt_15709
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031169.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Cecile de Jongh <i s>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10 2016 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Very good news indeed.\nWith warm regards,\nCecile"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032210.txt_15713
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032210.txt
subject: live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 10:06:20 AM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "which friday ?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 10:06:32 AM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "but you can ttravel to me without it ?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 10:06:42 AM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "I need your help this week"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 12:43:15 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "https://join.skype.com/invite/j1r0g0Vxn3fl3"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 12:43:29 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "please skype meet her today and she might fly with you"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 02:34:59 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "10 minutes"}, {"sender": "live:linkspirit", "recipients": ["jeevacation"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:17:35 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "May we call you?"}, {"sender": "live:linkspirit", "recipients": ["jeevacation"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:39:19 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "We googled you"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:39:36 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "do i look cute"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:40:01 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "now should understand that i dont care about her photos"}, {"sender": "live:linkspirit", "recipients": ["jeevacation"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:40:24 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "Nice article about girls for trump"}, {"sender": "live:linkspirit", "recipients": ["jeevacation"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:40:28 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": ":)"}, {"sender": "live:linkspirit", "recipients": ["jeevacation"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:56:55 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "Should I send her passport to Lesley?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation", "recipients": ["live:linkspirit"], "timestamp": "04/05/2019 03:57:08 PM", "subject": "live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05", "body": "i did"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280.txt_15720
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm ler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 5:11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 23, 2018, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "ihtink weak thoughts?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at_12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt_15724
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt
subject: Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael C. Miller", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "October 8, 2016 at 4:52:27 PM EDT", "subject": "FW: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Palazzolo, Joseph", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 08, 2016 4:49 PM", "subject": "WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM", "subject": "Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 8, 2016, at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 2:53:46 AM", "subject": "Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": "Privileged - Redacted |"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030511.txt_15732
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030511.txt
subject: feel fre to pass this to your presss people,
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 6 2011 08:51 AM", "subject": "feel fre to pass this to your presss people,", "body": "you ok? these stories are complete ant utter fantasy,, I don't know and have never met Al gore, CLinton was\nnever on the island.. the telephone book is not mine, it was stolen by my houseman that is currently in prison\nfor doing so."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt_15748
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "VVVVYV lling you from a 310 #...\n\n> President Obama’s response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has\n\n> reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader’s hidden wealth.\n\n> http://ww.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\n\n> fo\n\n>\n\n> VVVVVVVVVVVV VV VV VV\n\n>\n\n> rtune. html ?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Pe i you havetime"}, {"sender": "Lito", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:57:02 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Se"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026624.txt_15751
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026624.txt
subject: Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness I Law News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 1, 2016 at 4:40:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness I Law News", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high- profile/trump- team- fires- back- after- j ane- doe- refiles-rape- lawsuit-with-new- witness/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt_15752
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:09:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative . ? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara \nlago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos . ? people dont want to conribute money \nas he said he is worth over 10b , why should they?, calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in \nthe casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien, under the gambling \nrules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father \nleave, his brother robert etc. \notherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033091.txt_15756
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033091.txt
subject: Re: Tomorrow
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Tomorrow", "body": "Just remembered I have to give a luncheon talk tomorrow. So if, by any chance, you got an opening tomorrow AM that would be terrific."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Tomorrow", "body": "18 usc 981"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Tomorrow", "body": "You're killing me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/22/2018 7:28:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Tomorrow", "body": "Trump-Financial-Disclosure-2017.pdf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023222.txt_15759
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023222.txt
subject: ulysses 2.0
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "ulysses 2.0", "body": "I realize it is only due to a lack of understanind of the job ahead. and not out of any sense of\n\nunwillingess to pay\n\n- as opposed to merely hiring people to set up a family office, someone will have to do _ the following-\nseparate from the art partnership which is my responsiblity . there still needs to be a huge amount of\nwork done for 2015,16. not to mention that brad at the moment is going to have train the incoming\nteam?? your call\n\nstrategic decisions re estate and other planning , sale of phaidon etc. . in addition setting up for the\naccounting for each strategy te.:\n\nincome, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise picasso, 1031 calder.. review and detailed oversite\nof IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, entity valuations (many ) tax filings- disclosures, follow\nup of grats, trusts ,defective trusts, Ilcs corps , trustees , partnerships. foreign corps. 100 bank\naccount need to be rationalized, not only having brad step in to children investments . gift taxes, trust\n, loans, notes. payables. expenses allocations . . , insurance.( life , art, split dollar), cashflows,\noperating biz, , investments, contingent liabilitiites.( funds , miami ) , commitments funds and charities\n, dividend treatment -important review of transcations relating to BRH ( amendments) TRA sale (\nnuanced ) , shareholder agreements, bank loan agreements new bank relationships. ._ wills,\nconstruction accounting and oversite , contracts planning permits etc..employee rules, regs, .\nchecking account reconciliations, crediti cards. jewelry , cost basis ,( art stock etc.) foundations regs\n, brokerage accts,. stock options,( ie environmental solutions still not done !). estate tax calcualtion\nfiredrill, ( note ,basis etc ) review of boat expenses plane expenses, depreciation issues refunds etc. .\nrationalize all outside counsels and accounting firms\n\nPaul Weisss , Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse , Reich, withers bergman, Empire, ,\nakin gump, bbd seidman, , Apollo in house counsel.\n\nset up and oversee brokerage accounts at JPM DB GS and thoughfullly trade\n\n.new IT system from top to bottom full time IT person\n\nnew accounting system - on- line banking cooridnated with reports . fire drills as per caruci (he\nsounds good ) and. audit system,s . review of john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? .\n\nin house, review household ( 12million ) review, filings- partnerhip accounting,- familitarity with\ngrats, trusts etc . audit system put in place. that should be the easy part. then strategy re:\nAs new facts on the ground develop, phaidon debra, children meeetings, involvment , trustees\nadjusted, stock sale sale of art, , apt( large gain ), 1031 trade in , plane depreciation, boat sale.\nconstruction , brad will oversee brokerage and investment, ?? pe?. real estate?, . publishing,\n\ngrats, tra, brh ( death). foundation , museum, tax proejctions cash flow projections, cooridnation with\ntax from apollo. etc\n\nyou are sitting on over 100 m of cash???!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "ulysses 2.0", "body": "Leon, I decided last week that there was little or no upside in disturbing your well earned holiday"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023236.txt_15764
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023236.txt
subject: Fwd: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:51 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Valuation Discount", "body": "early on I told you I thought Tom remarkably careless . Eilleen goofy and your art lawyer not well\ninformed to say the least. you told me Tom was a senior partner. Eileen had headed the trading desk , and\nRalph Lerner had to know what he was doing as he wrote the book. . I said I thought you deserved\nbetter ,should get better people and no , Iam not an HR person. yesterday you told me that the reason\nyou have hired whomver you could find was to avoid being dependent on me. a decision by far , not the\nbest place to try to save money )\n\nJoslin- who you say I hired . I neither found nor hired. With a two person given choice I approved joslin\nover some woman that eileen preferred. against my repeated advice you and eileen decided the pay range\nat under 300k . I told you at that time that I would personally pay the difference for a higher quality\nperson, that was years ago . I have sent over a hundred emails to you clearly saying he needs to be\nclosely managed by better professionals. initially , that referred to Eillen and Ada.and after, brad. john\netc. THere are many emails each and every month from me, telling you , he is slipping failing cracking\nfragile. . crazy, nuts, heading towards incompetence. Unless YOU- TAKE ACTION! when I pressured\nhim for accurate numbers , you told him, to tell me, that he works for you and NOT for me. . When I\ncontinued to press for accuracy from your office , you told me that they were now all afraid of me and 1\nshould let brad communicate any requests, ( you now tell me \" we know what Brad is\"?). When I told you\nyou office needs to be reviewed and changed you told me 1 was being destructive rather than\nconstructive. when i ultimately confronted joslin, in an attempt to protect you, told him that his numbers\nwere wildly inaccurate , you told me that i had caused his ultimate resignation and now have an\naffirmative obligation to fill in the resultant gap.\n\nI did give you a bad number , and apologized as soon as i realized it. an error that was an embarrassment\nforme, the fact that that the accurate number is still way below what you agreed to pay , has fallen by\nthe wayside.( the preposterous argument that the end of year transaction was Alans idea , which you now\nknow was not true and that me not receiving Phaidon documents was unexplainable. was your justification\nthough, for non - full payment )\n\nHopefully You will recall that when you initially asked for my help. I declined repeatedly with the\nadmonition that that having a financial arrangement is fraught with danger and could complitcate our\nfriendship (as you will be unhappy paying what you will view as a large sum. while choosing to ignore\nthe financial benefits, ). In Bedford , I repeated my concern. THe current circumstance is distressing to\nme, Ihave done my utmost to keep you safe. and will continue to do so. reckless choices in\naccounting or otherwise does not bode well. at each turn I have put your interests first , including in some\ninstances attempting to fight your choices.\nyour current circumstance needs nuanced attention. as you know, there are a few areas with very serious\nconsequences. whether it be , having Ada , form grats without review, brad doing phaidon without\nreview. payments make without review.merely in order to be weaned , is one more high risk choice.\nreview of outside accounting firms , CANNOT be done by brad. to have your accounting dept sit in on\nAlans trust accounting lecture . in order to learn the filed is reminiscent of elieen reading the tax regs. (\nshe also was going to take a course)\n\nI am here in New York today. should you like to resume"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030734.txt_15772
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030734.txt
subject:
  Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:52:00 -0400", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/20/politics/china-cold-war-us-superpower-influence/index.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "So epic---world coming our way"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2018, at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "Daily beast well done"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/21/2018 12:31:16 PM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "Thanks-- exploding right now"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022207.txt_15777
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022207.txt
subject: Latest screen shot
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al Seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 9:28:38 PM", "subject": "Latest screen shot", "body": "This is the latest screenshot. Mike managed to knock out daily beast again. She is a pain and very very persistent. We managed to push Huffington post down near bottom and is about to be pushed off, but it would take a bit more work, and again, you have your active detractors out there. Just the way it is.\n\nOn the second page, we have replaced 8 toxic references with good ones, and there are four toxic ones left, which were pushed off the first page.\n\nThe science and org sites would have been placed higher if there was new content created and added. Mike, however, is stopping work now on the project.\nWe need to talk about island asap, as they are bugging me for logistics.\n\nThanks.\nme"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt_15778
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt
subject: A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to "Purify" Trump I A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 7:26:43 PM", "subject": "A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to \"Purify\" Trump I A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube", "body": "The Indians are getting involved https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=hYy7qy2AQeo"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026630.txt_15779
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026630.txt
subject: Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, Al system finds
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2016 12:34:36 PM", "subject": "Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, Al system finds", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/28/donald-trump-will-win-the-election-and-is-more-popular-than-obama-in-2008-ai-system-finds.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt_15780
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 117 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Mi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow(s)\nMichael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/676040070"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "How are you sneaky?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "sexy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023550.txt_15786
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023550.txt
subject: a JokeLand E-Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joke 2nd", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/9/2015 7:17:32 PM", "subject": "a JokeLand E-Mail", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026323.txt_15787
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026323.txt
subject: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting.\nI admire your friends determination.\n\nAre you serious about working on this?\n\nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization.\n\nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George\n\nbush. This might be bad.\n\nOn other hand, gore would not have to move left to take Nader vote.\n\nIf I like centrism is it clear that this is better.\n\nI get that it avoids arbitrary outcomes but assume that a tea party nut is as likely to elect a dem as a lefty is to elect et a\n\nrepublican.\nAnyway thanks for setting up.\nBtw I gave them 10,000.\n\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026618.txt_15790
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026618.txt
subject: Fwd: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 3:31:35 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nSubject: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself\nFyi\nBest\nEB\n\nCheck out this video on YouTube:\nhttp://youtu.be/6TcbU5jAavw"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt_15813
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [qq]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 10:23:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we know jared doesnt do squat without direction. . changes coming"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018084.txt_15816
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018084.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "10/28/2010 4:16:11 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Special tax benefits could help founders and investors\nby Craig Sherman and Andrew Bryant on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 9:10am PDT\nCraig Sherman and Andrew Bryant: A little noticed provision of a recently enacted federal tax law may lead\nto a significant increase in the formation of new startups and angel investing before the end of this year. If you\nhave been thinking about founding or investing in a technology startup, there is no better time to jump in and\ntake advantage of a recently enacted federal income tax benefit.\nPresident Obama recently signed into law changes to tax law that may, under certain circumstances, exempt\nprofits from investments in startup companies from ALL federal income tax, including alternative minimum\ntax. Yes, that's right, if you start a new company now and sell it more than five years from now and make a $10\nmillion profit on the sale, you may owe NO federal income taxes on your profit.\nThis special tax benefit will apply only to stock issued to founders or investors between September 28 and\nDecember 31, 2010, so time is of the essence.\nThe founder or investor would have to buy and hold shares of a \"qualified small business\" for five or more\nyears. A \"qualified small business\" is a C corporation engaged in an active trade or business with less than $50\nmillion in aggregate gross assets.\nIf you satisfy the above requirements and certain other conditions, you may not have to pay federal income\ntaxes on your first $10 million of gain. If there is a liquidity event within five years of your purchase of\nqualified small business stock, you may still be eligible to \"roll over\" any gains from sale of the shares tax-free\nwithin 60 days into another qualified small business."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt_15818
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt
subject:
  Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 12:23:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "all fun"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "Here we go again."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt_15838
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt
subject: FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Pinette", "recipients": ["Bill Gates"], "timestamp": "Mon Aug 26 2013 4:17 PM", "subject": "Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "Headline\tJournalist\tOutlet\tFull Text\nEnergy\nNuclear Operator Raises Alarm on Crisis\tHiroko Tabuchi\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nThe New Nuclear Craze\tMark Bittman\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nPipeline-Capacity Squeeze Reroutes Crude Oil\tRussell Gold\tWall Street Journal\tArticle text\nU.S. Electrical Grid on the Edge of Failure\tJeff Tollefson\tNature\tArticle text\nTechnology\nBallmer Departure From Microsoft Was More Sudden\tKara Swisher\tAll Things D\tArticle text\nThan Portrayed by the Company\nThe Decline of E-Empires\tPaul Krugman\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nAs Amazon Stretches, Seattle's Downtown Is Reshaped\tKirk Johnson & Nick\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nWingfield\nState Budgets and Healthcare Costs\nHow to Charge $546 for Six Liters of Saltwater\tNina Bernstein\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nStates scramble to get health-care law's insurance\tSarah Kliff and\tWashington Post\tArticle text\nmarketplaces up and running\tSandhya\nSomashekhar\n80 House members: Shutdown better than Obamacare\tCharles Babington\tAssociated Press\tArticle text\nBerkshire Hathaway\nNo breaking news\nPhilanthropy\nPhilanthropy: the givers club\tCordelia Jenkins\tLivemint and the Wall\tArticle text\nStreet Journal\nGlobal Health and Development\nPat on the back or force for good: what purpose do\tMark Tran\tGuardian blog\tArticle text\ndevelopment awards serve?\nEducation\nA Chance at Learning\tGinia Bellafante\tNew York Times\tArticle text\nObama goes for college 'datapalooza'\tNick Anderson\tWashington Post\tArticle text\nMassively Online And Offline Too: How MOOCs Will\tGiovanni Rodriguez\tForbes\tArticle text\nEvolve In The Physical World\nWomen and Children\nIndian Police Arrest Suspects in Two Gang Rapes\tSean Mclain and\tWall Street Journal\tArticle text\nKhushita Vasan\nIs there any space in the development debate for African\tAndrew Quinn\tGuardian blog\tArticle text\nexperts?\nChild marriage campaigners in south Asia receive $23m\tMark Tran\tGuardian blog\tArticle text\ncash injection"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 26 2013 02:46 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "See good article re balmer below.\nStill awaiting for call reply"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt_15848
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon xy"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire | | time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers MM. She never saw anything that claims. She canconfirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe | and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. .. they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy,..8. WE answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with I. AndJworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\n\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "that is old news -- buy dollar and take a nap? Kind of like buying Apple?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon xy"], "timestamp": "1/16/2015 8:12:46 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "yes, but not if you own dollars. bitcoin collapse pound is the most overvalued of alll but its a tax haven. norwegina kroner weak. sfr ,dollar . only thing to own"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033052.txt_15861
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033052.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 11, 2017 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Weird connections....i know glenn simpson very well....more to be said about that when I see you"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:53:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I KNOW"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt_15867
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:28:58 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:55 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031747.txt_15882
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031747.txt
subject: kerry scheme
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/31/2015 11:24:38 AM", "subject": "kerry scheme", "body": "he will get hillarty indicted, they will need a candidate at the last moment it will either be him or biden. he\nwon most states last time. biden has no money so kerry can buy him out of race."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt_15893
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New TE", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\n\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New ____l", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "serena , bill clinon shaque and,,,,, have all on pbs. ? read poetry for children. I would love to have you\n\ndo the same........ blah blah blah do not say come on my show."}, {"sender": "Lisa New i", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "this poem about childbirth and is not for children.\nIt's for adults and it raises awareness on the issues of discrimination against women athletes in sports\nand, against women of color in childbirth. These are Serena's big issues now.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "sorry , that was meant as a filler what is important is that she is joining the others priority . and not\nappearing on your show. !:) invite you to appear is DOA"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <7 E", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you give me a little bit of phrasing you think is optimal? I'm not sure I know how to ask her to join this\ncompany without asking her to be\n\npart of poetry in america. It does also seem to me perhaps relevant that Serena thinks of herself as a poetry\nperson.\n\nFor people who think that way, maybe not nothing (hasn't been nothing to others) that a Harvard poetry\nprofessor seeks her wisdom on the art form?\n\nWould really appreciate your edit.\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:55:13 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt_15901
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:54:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you agree with my thesis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032974.txt_15907
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032974.txt
subject: Re: production: 16db-stocks published
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 2:03:54 AM", "subject": "Re: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "thnks for sending"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Channeling you! Maybe even the big guy gives it a read. What? This? From the failing NYT?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Scoop Notifications <scoop-notifications@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "February 15, 2017 at 8:25:29 PM EST", "subject": "production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Hi Landon Thomas Jr. -\n\n16db-stocks has been published.\n\nThe URL is: http://(www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/business/dealbook/stock-market-investment-trump.html\n\nPlease consider sharing the article on social platforms.\n\nThank you!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt_15913
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "7/7/2016 1:04:06 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Thank you, Jeffrey. Mike"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 07, 2016 8:12 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025649.txt_15921
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025649.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Steve Bannon\nto me\nFeb 24 (1 day ago)\nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classifled-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437  \ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <M1111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "onlyu slightly, said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out\nWhat is Benjamin upset about?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:30:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Barf."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023020.txt_15924
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023020.txt
subject:
  Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names i and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMsi further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:38:16 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 11:24:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt_15926
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt
subject: Fw: media inquiry - Fox News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Investigative Reporter, FoxNews.com", "recipients": ["Mr. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg \nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. \nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about \nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump? \nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week? \nThanks for your consideration."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, May 06, 2016 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Just following up again in hopes of arranging a phone interview or email exchange. \nThanks for your consideration."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/6/2016 7:52:09 PM", "subject": "Fw: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026426.txt_15932
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026426.txt
subject: Re: Ref. : TR:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 11:37:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Ref. : TR: ", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Jean HUGUEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "28/11/2016 10:01:14", "subject": "TR: ", "body": "Dear jeffrey \n\nFrom our side we could postponed the trip ,visit the 2 works from Plant Thursday the 15th and have our \nmeeting Friday the 16th all of us,but need an answer from Plant. \nPlease tell me if it is convenient for you Friday the 16th,or Thurday late afternoon \nThanks\njean"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["___________________________________________", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "lundi 28 novembre 2016 01:23", "subject": "Re: Ref. : TR: ", "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt_15937
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt
subject: Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2011 10:14:55 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Bozhe Moi!! \nHope I'll handle my utensils:))"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2011 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Gergen went on to become the Director of Communications for President Gerald Ford and President Ronald \nReagan, a counselor on domestic and foreign affairs for President Bill Clinton and his Secretary of State, \nWarren Christopher, and an adviser to the 1980 George H.W. Bush presidential campaign."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt_15955
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:49:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "help yes no question FRAUD show me an inkling. ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect | am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt_15965
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt
subject: | beat Bush
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey Epstein [jevacations@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:15:33 PM", "subject": "| beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n| got more votes than Jeb Bush got in lowa, and | only had one congressional district, he had four!! It’s so funny (to me —\ntotally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump and might be a delegate to the republican convention.\n\nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St. Jeff and it\nwas beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the water where the\ndivers go....\n\nLove ya,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt_15966
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Are you enjoying la? I liked your trump exaggerations not lies"}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2018 12:34:34 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Can't complain thus far..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt_15968
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephen Alexander", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/7/2016 10:05:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "A pal from Trump's military school days came out in his defense. What the author failed to mention was Peter Ticktin's law license has been suspended twice since 2009 for unethical practice of law. Makes him the perfect \"character witness\" for The Donald, eh? Man Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bombshell TRUTH... \"I Was Aghast\" Man Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bombshell TRUTH... Donald Trump NEVER thought this was going to come out... View on conservativetribune.com Preview by Yahoo"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt_15971
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt
subject: Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak <1111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 2:38:55 PM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "this is your interview not his"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt_15972
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjén Jagland Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:29:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. Iam\ntotally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "lor. 8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Iaminparis you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt_15979
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt
subject: Re: My datebook
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <EMMIIMMIIIMIM>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": "Three hours with SB who believes DJT won't last to the mid terms. Also saw Brad Karp who is super menchy and offering much help on next book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:49:52 AM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt_15989
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "[i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "[i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 9:48:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt_16003
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt
subject: hey hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 3:43:30 PM", "subject": "hey hey", "body": "‘He doesn’t like this sh*t’: Trump\nreportedly hates his job and his staff after\nless than a month\n\nK\n\nTRAVIS GETTYS\n10 FEB 2017 AT 08:38 ET"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt_16005
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt
subject: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 4:36:41 AM", "subject": "Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear\nJeffrey\n(and please see note at bottom),\n\nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016\nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and\nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether\nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you’ve more recently joined our\ncircle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this year’s\nsuccesses possible.\n\nLast fall, | knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced\ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production,\nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit\ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard’s Division of Continuing Education), and getting\nthe word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America for\nTeachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the highest-\nquality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried\nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of\nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing\nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble and\nstable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate\ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and\ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, | have much progress to report.\n\nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3\n\nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company |’d founded in 2014, received\nIRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions, Verse\nVideo Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational media for\nother institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School, YIVO Institute\nfor Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and Project Zero. While\nphilanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the impact of\nphilanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship partnerships with\nWGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and projects. These include\na video series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a\ncollaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion\nof our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diversely\ntalented board, Verse Video Education is looking toward sustainability. We are now discussing\ndistribution of new content with a variety of stakeholders, including media providers in China.\n\nNew Harvard Partner: Bok Center for Teaching and Learning\n\nMeanwhile, Poetry in America has deepened its partnership and formulated a plan for growth going\nforward at Harvard. This fall, Harvard's Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Mike Smith,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt_16006
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt
subject: RE: Hello!!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gwendolyn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 25, 2017 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello!!!", "body": "Great news\n\nHi Jeffrey,\n\nJust called, but not sure I have the right cell number for you. Thinking of you and hope life is treating you great! Any news?\n\nAll good here in the District of Corruption — I’m lovin’ Trump. He is turning this town on its head, and have to admit, I’m enjoying watching the action (except for the shooting, of course, which was tragic). Especially interesting is watching the Dems implode — I’m really shocked at how wrong they judged the public. Am having dinner tonight with one of the Blue Dog Dems, and think they could maneuver to take over the party — Rep. Jim Costa is the defacto head — we’ll see. Have popcorn, sitting back and watching the show\n\nJust got a big promotion to Manager of Senior Health, Virginia Hospital Center/Mayo Clinic. Am very excited, and love the job — it is so rewarding. I spend most of my time giving lectures on neurodegenerative diseases, sleep, heart health and strategies for longevity. And the rest of the time as liaison to State and local Department’s of Aging, facilitator to the Alzheimer and Dementia Caregiver Support Group and managing the assistive technology program.\n\nIf you hear of any special panels or commissions President Trump is forming, please keep me in mind. Sure the hospital won’t mind loaning me out, and pretty sure I’m one of a handful of Republican Gerontologists.\n\nLet me know if you get to DC. Would LOVE to see you!!!\n\nMiss you and all the great times we had xxxx\nGwendolyn\n\nPS. How are Fred and Mort doing?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/25/2017 9:10:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello!!!", "body": "Thanks!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt_16008
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt
subject: Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cecile de Jongh", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "FYI\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-as-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Cecile de Jongh"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 1 2012 01:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "whoops"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt_16016
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt
subject: Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/17/2018 7:12:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "its the leader for the next years ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "China's big tech stocks have fallen into a bear\nmarket at the same time that regulatory threats\nagainst U.S. big tech companies are gaining\nmomentum. Can U.S. big tech stocks soldier on\nalone or is this a harbinger that the group as a whole\nis losing its tremendous leadership position?\n\nSep 13, 2018\nTechnology & Security\nTech Backlash\n\nSave Article\n\nDownload PDF\n\nbig-tech-backlash\n\nIn recent months, China’s BAT collapse has demonstrated how costly the expectation of\ninvincibility can be—Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are all down more than 24%\nfrom their year-to-date closing highs. Citigroup’s head of Asia strategy, Mohammed\nApabhai, told CNN an apt analogy about the investor sentiment that led to BAT’s collapse,\nlikening “the exuberance for tech stocks to the Looney Tunes cartoons in which Wile E.\nCoyote chases Road Runner over a cliff.” Given they’ve more or less moved in\ntandem for years, will FAANG follow the same path as BAT?\n\nThe BAT collapse was triggered by subpar earnings and a shifting regulatory environment\nin China. Facebook’s miss in 2Q18—which drove a $120 billion single-day market cap\nloss, the biggest ever for a U.S. company—showed how decisive a turn could be if more\nU.S. tech darlings stumble this quarter."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt_16018
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with M. And Mworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire Mitime she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that =PM claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "Landon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon%20jr%20thomas/index.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt_16031
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg <IMIMI>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026368.txt_16033
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026368.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Gates"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 15 2015 11:40 AM", "subject": null, "body": "will you be around week of 28th for general assembly clinton week? in new york"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt_16035
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Raafat Alsabbagh"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 10:21:17 AM", "subject": null, "body": "attached is a first draft, tell me what changes additions or modifications you suggest. I am happy you are returning so fast. If Mohammed really wants to see the future, after seeing the past in Washington with Obama, we should take him to see the Laboratory at MIT. advanced robotics. Artificial Intelligence etc."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt_16058
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 9:57:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.txt_16060
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.txt
subject: Fwd: CNN Inquiry
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler TE Darren Indykc iy"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 6:14:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Not\nRose) interested"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Fyi\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031545.txt_16066
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031545.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 1, 2017 5:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what does the flyinn plea mean in the scheme of things"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/1/2017 5:42:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Beginning of the end...will say trump told him to go the russkies"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883.txt_16068
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883.txt
subject: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 2:09:16 AM", "subject": "Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031223.txt_16077
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031223.txt
subject: Re: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033244.txt_16082
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033244.txt
subject: Peter Thiel Has Been Hedging His Bet On Donald Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 7:51:25 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel Has Been Hedging His Bet On Donald Trump", "body": "https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanmac/peter-thiel-and-donald-trump?utm term=.1vyllavykiwWNNok75"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.txt_16094
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmier", "Darren Indyke", "Viartin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 1:07:24 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030667.txt_16104
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030667.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt_16112
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Masha Drokova <mashadrokova@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still waiting Nowak to respond about when he can call(I'll keep following up with him, not a prob) \nFound this looking for the details of what is happening with the federal budget for science \nhttp s ://www. congress . gov/c ongressional-rep ort/115th-congress/house-rep ort/231/1  \nHere's a list of outlets to approach about what you are going to bridge the funding gap: \n* MIT Technology Review \n* Nature \n* Washington Post \n* Science \n* Wall Street Journal \n* WIRED \nTopic to approach \nhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-21/for-the-impact-of-trump-slashing-science-funding-look-\nnorth?utm content=politics&utm campaign=socialflow-\norganic&utm source=twitter&utm medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-politics"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 1:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Progress?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 6:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2017 12:57:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will talk to here this morning \nher Skype contact is in moscow. \nis this correct?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt_16115
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt
subject: Trump tariffs are in 'Stop, or I'll shoot myself in the foot' category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 9:20:51 PM", "subject": "Trump tariffs are in 'Stop, or I'll shoot myself in the foot' category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/06/trump-tariff-threats-harming-us-ex-treasury-chief-larry-summers.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt_16122
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt
subject: Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion I World news I The Guardian
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:51:52 PM", "subject": "Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion I World news I The Guardian", "body": "Bad news for TJB \nhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A www.theguardian.com world 2017 may 29 close-\n2Dfriend-2Dtrump-2Dthomas-2Dbarrack-2Dalleged-2Dtax-2Devasion-2Ditaly-2Dsardinia-3FCMP-3Dshare-\n5Fbtn-5Ffb&d=DQIFAg&c=euGZstcaTD1lvimEN8b7jXrwq0f-\nv5A CdpgnVfiiMM&r=qvsWPMySvJQKJyiCbbH3 UeJCrKMWih9KXDAwYE2eSw&m=HWy8k1H7mKJ 1 s \ny-3HdPAkCHdCOMhzGlxMC3 stl3GEg&s=F0WqhPv3Cj87MVTDCVx3sZahVmybNtdsoq3D V-5yAU&e="}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt_16126
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt
subject: interesting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:12:27 AM", "subject": "interesting", "body": "Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.\n\nWell before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was a “global tea party movement” and praised European far-right parties like Great Britain’s UKIP and France’s National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist element in far-right parties “all gets kind of washed out,” that the West was facing a “crisis of capitalism” after losing its “Judeo-Christian foundation,” and he blasted “crony capitalists” in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial crisis.\n\nThe remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in a secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 50-minute Q&A during a conference focused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News attended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe’s religious right. The group was founded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the European Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a “Christian voice” in European politics. The group has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic\n\nChurch; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who was ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, is chair of the group’s advisory board. BuzzFeed News originally posted a transcript beginning 90 seconds into the then-Breitbart News chairman’s remarks because microphone placement made the opening mostly unintelligible, but we have completed the transcript from a video of the talk on YouTube. You can hear the whole recording at the bottom of the post.\n\nHere ts what he said, unedited:\n\nSteve Bannon: Thank you very much Benjamin, and I appreciate you guys including us\n\nin this. We’re speaking from Los Angeles today, right across the street from our"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt_16127
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 8:41:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "gender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . \nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, the \norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used \nas signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. = \nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are \nall math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not \nemotinal for me."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: \n\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch \nup), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor \ndevelopment! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-\nlevel structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it \nis easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place. \nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more \nhunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, \ndelayed gratification for agriculture etc. \n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social \nand cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and \nlearn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts \nand mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they \nenjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in \nmath, because it does not help people or yield social attention. \n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with \npeople, one will not have good social cognition. \n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect \nhistorically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and \nanti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia. \n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to \nunderstanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a \nmotivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in \nmusic. \n\nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical \nlanguage, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge \nto build grammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural \nlanguage can work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit. \n\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those \nlayers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best \ndescribe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" \ndeveloped\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a \nrecapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little \ndevelopment. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process. \n\nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be \npath effects, starting in culture. \n\nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly \na good thing for the species \n\nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more \nhumane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, \nbecause there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a \nhardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die. \n\nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate \nchange itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I \nmight be wrong. \n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent \n\nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism \nis fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could \npull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that \neverybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited \nKZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very \nthoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it. \n\nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores \nwhat would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a \nbrutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a \nflat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, \nbut unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order. \n\nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, \nbut now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? \nDid you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to \ntransform into. \n\nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything \nremotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still \nworks\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, \nhard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men \nand Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere. \n\nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-\nladen topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with \nsymbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-\ncontroversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely \noffending anyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance). \n\nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. \nThis invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of \nhis ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others. \n\nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is \nright. Public communication is about reaching one's goals. \n\nBests, \nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when \nI get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but \nit seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfasters. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention \nto, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual \nwill find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering \nother people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same \ngroup, slower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go o gle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/  \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or \nhand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of \nPython code. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They \ncurrently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object \nfeatures, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is \nmissing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor \nsimulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They \ntry to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \nJoscha"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt_16128
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 130 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Bennet", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 6:02:16 PM", "subject": "RE: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "H\n(bese reece tener teres renee teres renee ene ec ree Beer Tee Tees Tee eR eS BE BTS ee ee ee RN TE ee Tee ee ee tee ter terres\n\nRegards,\nBennet"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "Moskowitz, Bennet J."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Begin forwarded message:\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt_16140
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "S|"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm_term=.37ed1a334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know if your boy barrack is close witha lebanese/nigerian biz guy named chagoury?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I don't but with details can ask"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 3:12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Chagoury about to get indicted in l.a....wants me to rep him...supposed to be close to your guy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016596.txt_16142
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016596.txt
subject: ARCOM
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Page/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Kirk Blouin/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "06/26/2008 09:00 AM", "subject": "ARCOM", "body": "Kirk: We had our June monthly ARCOM meeting yesterday. You likely know that ARCOM is working with Mr. Trump to re-install a hedge on his North County Road property. I believe this case is now pending in front of Code Enforcement. In May, ARCOM approved a plan to replace the former hedge with silver buttonwood shrubbery, which would additionally be back-planted with silver buttonwood trees....the overall effect would be an eventual 20' high screen. The shrubs have been planted, but yesterday attorney Ray Royce asked for postponing the trees until the end of the Hurricane season. ARCOM said NO and directed the attorney and landscaper to get the trees in ASAP. Also, more shrubbery was required at the main entry (north side) to match the newly installed hedge on the south side.\n\nAs the meeting was ending, the Commissioners asked for one of two things. They asked that either 1) a quick written report from Code Enforcement be made available to them at their next meeting on July 23 (9:00 a.m.) about the enforcement status of the case, or 2) that someone from Code Enforcement attend their meeting to provide a verbal status report. Their patience is wearing thin with the whole hedge issue, and it has them naturally curious about what is happening with their counterparts on Code Enforcement.\n\nWould you or the appropriate representative from Code Enforcement be available on July 23? That would be my preference because follow-up questions almost always pop up. If not, can you provide me with a brief summary of your enforcement history and pending status? Thanks, JP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt_16143
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:39:47 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower!\nWorked most of fight.\n\nLets plan rather to meet tmr.\n\nLets talk tmr.\n\nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun.\n\nb"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt_16144
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt
subject: January 20, 2017
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey, \nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!! \nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA! \nBE for your BBB!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt_16148
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late\nPresident himself. As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a\njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of\npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas\nshould themselves feel ashamed.\n\nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the\nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are\nslanderous.\n\nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little\nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government\nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the\nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete\nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the\nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in\nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\"\n\nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would mean he - or his\nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go\nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party\nfor only two months... so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially\neverything to lose in the June vote.\n\nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy\n\nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover\nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal\nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the\nmemory of those who died.\n\nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to come in the coming presidential campaign -\nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the\npresidency.\n\nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obama is not\nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course,\nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous.\n\nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abiltiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on\nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt_16149
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:18:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would you do in order to consolidate the movement. . music. icons. personalites. etc? did you get\nyour first installment. ? did you send the poster"}, {"sender": "paul krassner <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My friend Aluna, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to 147.\nAlana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}, {"sender": "James Drougas", "recipients": ["Paul"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially. He\nwas in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last night he\ntold me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him if he would\njoin the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many months. Alas he was\nlaughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump.\n\nWarm and loving regards\n\nJim Drougas"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt_16159
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt
subject: Re: hicks
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2018 10:41:00 PM", "subject": "Re: hicks", "body": "So the florida shooter always wore a trump hat and was looking to kill Jews and women"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 15, 2018 2:55 PM", "subject": "hicks", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Sidney Blumenthal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2018 2:08", "subject": "Re: hicks", "body": "https://blindgossip.com/?p=89824"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030893.txt_16162
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030893.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "", "body": "in paris,, emailed steve - no response yet,, you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be aneye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. .\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence.\nIam curious what you think about Vanity fair piece?\n\nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew?\n\nWho would know that? Some of your employees?\nB"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "", "body": "has a big mouth.-- wasn't there a science person or someone that worked with consuelo that you thought\nintersting?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt_16164
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "Po", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "i otc", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "[iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will be in new york from tuesday sep 12 for a week.. let me know the date and time to meet you if you there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt_16165
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt
subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 2:14:35 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "OK.. Here it is... suggestions?\n\n1. Item 1: I did neck with that woman, but never forced myself on her, and we talked about kissing or going\nbeyond that and decided not to.\n\n2. Item 2: This was what I told you about.. A student who came to me for advice about science\ncommunication.. I never approached her, or did anything, and have emails rebuffing her requests to meet off\ncampus for coffee or meals.. not because they were suggestive, but because I didn’t think it was appropriate. I\ndid ask her about being a female in a male dominated physics major group because I wanted to find out what\nproblems might be occurring. Iwas respectful of her, and in fact my wife and I gave her a lift later ata AAAS\nmeeting that I had helped get her a fellowship to attend. I was shocked later to learn that she had\n\ncomplained. There was no official investigation.. no formal complaint lodged.. When I spoke to the Dean and\ntold her the above, including showing emails, it was agreed that there would be no formal complaint but\nbecause the student had been upset I would not interact with her at all. I was shocked and dismayed, as I had\nworked very hard to be supportive and mentor this girl\n\n3. Item 3: I have no idea about this.\n\n4. This never happened.. In March 2008 at the convention I was approached by a student who did ask to sit at a\ntable with the then executive director of the Dawkins foundation. She asked me to join her in the hot tub. I said\nnow. Afterwards the exec. director informed me that this person was complaining that I had harassed her, and\nshe told me as she was there at the time she would be more than happy to explain that it was quite the opposite.\n\n5. This was a cruise with Nancy, who was my female companion. When that report appeared I explained that\nmy wife Nancy was upset at the allegation as she was my companion and such a complaint could be considered\nlibelous. the complaint was removed from the bloggers web site. Moreover, CFI not only continued to invite\nme on cruises but to speak at their events, including this year, where they have strict harassment policies. I\ncontinue to receive letters of thanks from them for my contributions, attitude, graciousness etc.. No complaints\never. Not one!\n\n6. This one you know about.\nShall we talk?\nLMK"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027099.txt_16167
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027099.txt
subject: Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "8/27/2012 11:05:23 AM", "subject": "Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": "http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j00NtuA2fbH1hED38qZkrNKc6VJw?docId=CNG.15\n8e059567cc64e99373df644f3134b3.01"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:22 AM", "subject": "Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Esneh", "recipients": ["Esneh"], "timestamp": "August 27, 2012 9:23:47 AM GMT+01:00", "subject": "How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": "Israel Policy Forum\nOn Iran: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift\nEphraim Sneh\nThe Islamist takeover in the Middle East and North Africa has created perilous strategic\nturbulence in the region. Consequently, it is now critically important that the United States and\nits few allies cooperate closely. Unfortunately, this has not been the case in recent weeks for US-\nIsrael relations regarding Iran's nuclear program. The disagreement about attacking Iran's\nuclear facilities has turned into ugly bickering, much of it disguised. This is harmful for both\nIsrael and the United States.\nTo heal this rift — which is necessary to effectively address the Iranian threat — we must\nunderstand the following basic facts:\n1. The Israeli fear of a nuclear Iran is genuine. It is not a political trick of Prime Minister\nBenjamin Netanyahu or Defense Minister Ehud Barak. A nuclear Iran would bolster and\nencourage extremist militant forces across the region. The moderates would be discouraged,\nintimidated and invariably weakened to the point where they would be unable to negotiate with\nIsrael. In just a few years, Israel will be surrounded by three Pakistan-like' countries: Saudi\nArabia, Egypt and Turkey. All three would possess nuclear weapons and be dominated\npolitically by Islamists. In such a scenario, Israel would lose its strategic advantage in the region.\nIt would lose its lead as a country of entrepreneurship and excellence, as foreign investment\nwould decline and talented young Israelis would build their future abroad. No responsible Israeli\nleader will allow such a nightmare to become a reality. The hateful declarations of Iran's leaders,\ncommitted to wiping the Jewish state off the map, do not assuage Israelis' fears.\n2. Economic sanctions cannot convince the regime in Teheran to abandon its nuclear project.\nHowever, sanctions can bring about the collapse of the regime if they are vigorously\nimplemented and enforced.\n3. An American military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities would be more effective\nthan an Israeli one. But disparaging Israel's capabilities and its military ingenuity, undermining\nits deterrence effect, is a grave mistake.\n4. Israel's operational window is closing. If Israel has to cope alone with the Iranian threat, its\nwindow of operational opportunity is narrower than the American one. It has to act sooner.\n5. An Israeli military strike in the next two months, contravening repeated demands by the\nU.S. President to postpone it, would be counterproductive. The damage of defying the\nPresident would be greater than the damage sustained by allowing the Iranian regime an\nadditional few months of advancing toward acquiring the bomb. Such a strike may broaden the\ngap between the U.S. and Israel and weaken the alliance, which all previous Israeli Prime-\nMinisters have safeguarded as a strategic asset of Israel.\n6. The United States has failed to prevent countries like Pakistan or North Korea from\nobtaining nuclear weapons. This record feeds Israeli skepticism about a U.S. success in the\ncase of Iran. This skepticism prevails despite the clear rhetoric and unquestionable commitments\nof the President and the Secretaries of State and Defense to prevent a nuclear Iran.\n7. The fact that the Israeli Prime Minister and the Republican presidential candidate share\nthe same political benefactor feeds suspicions in the Obama administration about Netanyahu's\nmotives for attacking Iran a few weeks before the U.S. presidential elections.\n8. The regional perspective cannot continue ignoring the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian\nconflict. This issue can no longer be swept under the rug. Maintaining the status quo is politically\ncomfortable in the short-run, but it will be combustible and devastating in the long run.\nAchieving the two-state solution will preserve Israel as a Jewish, democratic state. It will end\nIsrael's regional isolation. It will rebuild America's standing and influence in the Arab and\nMuslim world. Furthermore, these last two outcomes will strengthen America's and Israel's\nhands in thwarting Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions.\nThese eight basic facts combine to produce a complex reality. When fully understood, they can\npave the way to restoring U.S.-Israeli harmony. There is no symmetry between the United States, the super-power, and its tiny ally, Israel. But the \"package\" required from each side in order to\nmend fences has to include the following mutual commitments:\n1. Israel will not attack Iran in 2012.\n2. The United States will hold a joint intelligence estimate session with Israel in the early spring\nof 2013. If the conclusion of this joint estimate is that there is no substantial slow-down of the\nIranian nuclear project, the U.S. will take military action to destroy this project.\n3. The United States will oppose any attempt to intervene in Israel's strategic capacities and will\nprevent any monitoring of Israel's own strategic installations. At the same time, the United States\nwill uncompromisingly support Israel's right to preserve and develop its indigenous military\ncapacities.\n4. Israel will accept an American invitation to attend a peace conference that will be convened\nin the U.S. no later than mid-2013. This gathering will address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, aiming to resolve it once and for all with an agreed-upon timetable for implementation.\nThese four commitments would serve the interests of both the United States and Israel. They\nwould enable the U.S. to resume its leadership role of peacemaking in the Middle East. And they\nwould provide a basis for binding the U.S. and Israel together as they face these challenging\ntimes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032162.txt_16179
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032162.txt
subject: Re: begining edits
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nil Priell Barak"], "timestamp": "10/30/2014 2:50:38 AM", "subject": "Re: begining edits", "body": "David Ben Gurion was asked why he, after 2000 years, in contrast to the many great leaders in the past was uniquely able to re -established the State of Israel. BG responded that he thought that it must have been true that in ancient times people had been born with a sixth sense. The one enabling individuals to have the ability to recognize and the seize opportunities. Though few of those individuals remain I think I am one of the fortunate few. He didn't mentioned the horrors or the sacrifice of the 48' war. I believe Menachem Begin had it,as several years after the bitter 73' war he was able to make a daring peace with Egypt. Als lzhak Rabin,who now 20yrs ago, signed the Peace treaty with Jordan though in amidst a wave of terror. He faced huge internal rejection but it began the first baby steps towards a settlement with the Palestinians. As we all know he was assassinated by a Jewish terrorist. These leaders all faced many risks, yet were able to see and seize an opportunity. Statesmanship and leadership..\n\nDuring the last three years we have been living through a geo political earthquake. The world order, which existed since the demise of the Ottoman Empire, is collapsing.The Arab Spring appears to have turned into an Islamist Winter. Borders are erased. Old tribal and sectarian disputes have awakened. In perfect storm like fashion Israel now finds itself surrounded by clashes of civilizations, in addition to the Islam confrontation between fanatic terror and moderna, Suna and Shia, the legacy threats: Iran, Assad in Syria, Hezbullah in Lebanon,Hamas in Gaza are all still active and worrying.\n\nwe have to be alert and ready to strongly respond to any threat to our security..\n\nBut I believe new opportunities are there for the taking. This opportunity,which might not occur again for generations ,is the potential to reshape our relationships with the Arab Moderates based on our common concerns. Extremism, Terror and Iran. This could open the gate to a more peaceful Middle East based on cooperation and synergies rather than blood and revenge. However thers is, in my opnion n o way to achieve but to move forward with the Palestinians\n\nA precondition to seize such an opportunity is a mighty, sober, self confident Israel, in strong alliance with the US. An Israel which can deter or defeat any combination of regional powers, yet, an Israel who is ready to contemplate and consider a modified Saudi or Arab League Plan as a basis for negotiations.\n\nThe unique relationship we have developed with the US over the last 45yrs based on common values ,mutual respect and shared interests is a cornerstone of our strength, world posture and our future. It is also a crucial building block of any regional peace and cooperation strategy.Allowing IL/US relations to remain damaged, I believe is a grave mistake with potentially far reaching consequences.\n\nAs the Minister of Defense of Israel I've met more than once with President Obama , as well as with President Bush before him„ reiterating with both that the though the US is clearly our best friend and ally, Israel is a Sovereign state and when our security and the future of Israel and the Jewish people are at stake we might need to take tough decisions on our own. We cannot and will not, I added, delegate the responsibility for such decisions to even our best friends ,. We respect the fact that we might have different views. American Presidents have always understood that . We also must have the same respect when the US decides it is its interest to take decisions we might not fully agree with.\n\nthis relation is of course not fully symmetric. It is the US which will provides Israel with the new F-35s and ensures the Qualitative Edge of the IDF vis a vis any combination of neighbors. It is the US who significantly financed the Iron Dome, Arrow and David's Sling missile defense systems. It is the US that has commited to defend Israel in the event of a missile attack from Iran.\n\nWe should never forget it.\n\nThe recent spurt of verbal exchanges is a worrying signal that something has gone wrong. It needs corrrection.. Netanyahu is not a coward. I've seen him as a young special forces officer ,under my command, facing fire directly and taking risks to his life. A very courageous soldier. That will never change. cheap words serve little purpose .The same applies to President Obama and Secretary Kerry. they are not enemies of Israel. they are Good Friends. Kerry has exhibited decades long support for Israel. Since he became Secretary of State he has invested his time energy and prestige trying to help Israel and the Palestinians to bridge disputes and reach a breakthrough. it was a noble effort which should justify thanks rather than accustations. We are of course concerned by the lack of outcome of the P5+1 negotiations with Iran and we think that the chemical weapons removal from Syria could have been handled differently But President Obama strengthens the legacy of Presidential support for Israel.. Israel has a vital interest in resuming the healthy trust, and mutual respect that existed until recently.\n\n. I believe that the most profound internal debate inside Israel today is in regard to the relationship between Israel's security needs and the viability of the \"two states solution\". We all agree that we are living in a tough, merciless and highly unpredictable neighborhood..So it is clear that our security needs are of the highest priority and we should build certain \"safety margins\" into any future security planning.But the Israeli Right is going too far by arguing that the security needs of Israel renders any viable,demilitarized independent, Palestinian State - impossible.\n\nIn other words, the \" lesson\" of recent years according to our Right is that Israel's Security and the \"two states solution\" are incompatible. I believe this is a fallacious conclusion, driven by narrow political interests.\n\nI've served a lifetime career, fighting and defending my country's security. Most of the time in uniform. Based on this experience ,I confidently conclude,and it is a professional rather than political answer, that if and when a Palestinian demilitarized independent State will be established side by side with Israel behind borders which will consist of a solid Jewish majority for generations to come and will include the major \"Settlement Blocks\" accompanied by mutually agreed swaps and an Israeli long term military presence along the River Jordan - the IDF and the SecurityServices will be capable of defending Israel. Moreover, I'm confident that if we will bring together all former Israeli Chiefs of Staff, all former Commanders of the Central Command( responsible for Judea and Samaria) and all former Heads of Intelligence ,SecServices and Mossad, an extremely vast majority of them will agree with me on this issue. True,it might take time, frustrations and setbacks. It might have to go through prolonged periods of interim arrangements. but the IDF is much superior to any conceivable rival and will be able to defend Israel under all those circumstances.\n\nthe Right argument is convoluted, the opposite is true. The real big threat to the Zionist Project is not the \"two state solution\" but rather the \"one state solution\" which will lead inevitably to either a non Jewish or a non democratic, potentially ever bleeding State. Still,this is the vision the Israeli extreme Right shares unknowingly with the Hamas (and with all due differences with the lunatic, Post Zionist fringes of the Israeli Left).\n\nIn order to seize the opportunity for regional peace and cooperation arrangements and in order to block the deterioration towards \"one state solution\" action, tenacity and decisiveness will be essential. politics of survival, anxiety and pessimism will not do.\n\nwe are facing a moment of truth. a time for daring decisions.The essence of Zionism, its raison d'être had always been to take our fate in our hands. make decisions and follow them with actions, rather than being dragged by events and decisions of others and paying the price for it.\n\nour legendary Foreign Minister Abba Eban famously said that the Palestinians had never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Lets not fall into the same trap."}, {"sender": "Nil Priell Barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: begining edits", "body": "herewith the Op Ed. Please let me know your opinion and your remarks.\n\nthanks,\n\nEB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt_16180
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt
subject: Re: science in Trump time
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new PR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time. It can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you G But what I really like it's actually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes a kickstarter with no return, you form a 501 c 3 charity, that can accept donations. and give them out to scientists. . it s avery clever idea. good work!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 11:39:24 PM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "I'll think how to execute on it. I'm very focused on my fund but I want it to exist, will find a way"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030663.txt_16184
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030663.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt_16185
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt
subject: ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More
messages:
  [{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD [ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net]", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "If you are unable to see this message, click here to view. To ensure delivery to your inbox, add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net to your address book.\n\nEo\n\nActive Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\nWednesday, July 27, 2011"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt_16192
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt
subject: That was fun , see you in 3 weeks
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "5/19/2014 10:37:05 AM", "subject": "That was fun , see you in 3 weeks", "body": "FP Briefing non- classified\n19 May, 2014\n\nThe National Interest\n\nWhich Road Will Egypt Take?\nKathryn Alexeeff\n\nNow Lebanon\n\nWhat Saudi-Iran talks could mean for Lebanon and the\nregion\nAlex Rowell\n\nThe Economist\nIndia's next prime minister: The Modi era begins\nThe Christian Science Monitor\n\nAn India ready to dream big\nEditorial\n\nHiirriyet\n\nWill it be Cyprus’ year?\nYusuf Kanli\n\nThe National Interest\n\nStars Are Aligned for a Solution in Cyprus\nOzdil Nami\n\nThe diplomat\n\nChina’s Instructive Syria Policy\nAdrien Morin"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt_16195
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/11/2016 3:50:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/high-profile-casey-anthony-attorney-now-representing-jane-doe-in-trump-rape-lawsuit/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt_16201
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt
subject: Friday POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:04:53 AM", "subject": "Friday POTUS", "body": "Boston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI. \nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are: \nWhite Plains \nTeterboro \nOrlando \nDulles \nOrlando \nFortlauderdale \nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required \nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full. \nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM) \nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM) \nShould I request parking at Boca? \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt_16208
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "ji@media.mitedu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:16:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Can't seem to open the attachment..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ji@media.mitedu"], "timestamp": "Feb 2, 2017, at 20:24", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey\nTwo questions.\n1—do you believe the stock market will continue to climb given what we have now seen of Trump-land?\n[Strictly confidential]\n2—what do you think of the attached (N=1)? You do not drink or smoke, probably do not inject etc. you swim\nor exercise every day, so your heartbeat is expected to be low and less variable than average. Is your ability to\npredict heart rate accurately—without holding your neck or wrist—positively related to your ability to succeed\nin the financial world—as the attached strongly suggests. Just give me and N=1.\nRemember you asked me, what does self-knowledge have to do with anything—and here is a most intriguing\nexample.\nI will send you a joke shortly\nAll best\nbob"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt_16214
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt
subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:28 PM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are ae\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was\n\nnaked on massage table. Ms Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed I to copy her.\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant iii\nand Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed [ prior to sex\nsessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. | was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other\nmen.\n\nia was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les\nWexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt_16216
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I’m here until August ~11 if your schedule changes.\n\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\n\nLatest China -\n\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-\nbromance-cools/\n\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jul 22, 2017, at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "we can skype or phone , ready when you are re breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 7:29:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Great. When’s good - Skype/FaceTime/phone? Time Zone?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt_16219
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt
subject: Re: interesting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:30:28 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "i do not believe in a global tea party. but it is most interesting to see how those ideas will materialize and to witch exdend Ill be most interested to hear your point of wiew"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 18, 2016, at 12:14 PM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "your view?"}, {"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "Donald Trump's newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021508.txt_16227
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021508.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008", "body": "are charged for these records (as the FBI is a tax exempt entity). The DEDOC indicated that a \"Priority 7\" day certification request would take approximately two weeks to process. In addition, the DEDOC gave a quote for the various records and a total amount for the corporate records to be requested outlined as follows:\n\nTotal: $\n\nThird Party Draft is requested to issue AFI an advance check in the amount of\n\nmade payable to \"Delaware Secretary of State\" in order to obtain certified copies\n\nAFI will provide an invoice for these records once obtained from the Delaware Secretary of State. It should be noted that the receipt of the invoice will take 14 to 20 days.\n\nFor information of Third Party Draft in order to create a vendor account for the DEDOC:\n\nDelaware Secretary of State\nDivision of Corporations\nJohn G. Townsend Building\n401 Federal Street\n\nSuite 4\n\nDover, DE 19901\n\ntel: (302) 739-3073"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt_16231
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt
subject: The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "J.P Morgan\n\nGlobal Asset Allocation\n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\nJC\n\nMorgan View Video\n\ne Asset allocation — Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market\ncorrelations to remain much lower than in recent years.\n\ne Economics — US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are\nresponding to higher taxes.\n\ne Fixed Income — Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\ne Equities — Japan remains our main country overweight.\n\ne Credit — We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the\ncore.\n\ne Currencies — Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the\ndollar.\n\ne Commodities — Stay long Brent and short gasoline.\n\ne US stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds\nare generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains\nthe troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt.\n\ne Our overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead\na number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk\npremia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been\nlargely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”.\n\ne In addition, we are secing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into\na bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD\nactivity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst\noffsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile\nfor the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\ne Without a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a\nlocal impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this\nenvironment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various\nmarkets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our\nview of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term\ninvestors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\ne Local issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese\npolicy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt_16238
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:51:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "read the uzz feed re my airplane logs and hawain tropic contest. / have them ask my houseman about\ndonad almost walking through the door leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in\nthe pool and he was so focused he walked straight into the door"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon DR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt_16247
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 12:09:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don , ignores the fact that he has great\ndangerous power.. tightening the noose too slowly , risks a very bad situation.. gambino was never the\ncommander in chief. there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt_16248
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 1:42:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026119.txt_16250
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026119.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt_16252
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt
subject: Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Timothy Jones", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 22, 2019 4:16 PM", "subject": "Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Peggy,\n\nMy good friend Eleanore reached out to you on my behalf and I appreciate you wanting to hear more about this project.\n\nI am a TV journalist who covered the Epstein story for several years and wrote a best selling book about him with James Patterson in 2016.\n\nJim Patterson and I are now consulting on a four hour Netflix documentary series tentatively set to air towards the end of the year.\n\nThe showrunner, Lisa Bryant, is working with director Joe Berlinger whose work I am sure you are familiar with, to produce a fair and balanced, in-depth recounting of the Epstein saga that, as you know, has every possible dramatic angle and is a story like no other.\n\nWe thought of you because of your remarkable reputation in the public relations and show business world and the fact that you were an acquaintance of Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nThe tawdry side of the story has been told...We hope you can give us some insight and context into who he was before his life fell apart.\n\nI am sure that Lisa Bryant,Joe Berlinger and Jim Patterson would all make themselves available to get on a call with you this week.\n\nJim is in Florida,and Joe is traveling overseas for his Ted Bundy film.\n\nLisa is in New York and would be happy to meet you in person as would I.\n\nThanks for giving this your consideration.\n\nBest,\nTim Malloy"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <peggysiegal@example.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Fw: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey....how much do you know about this?\nWhen can I call you tomorrow? I know nothing but have friends at Netflix.\nEleanora Kennedy called me today....out of the blue...and told me the film makers wanted to talk to me. I know director Joe Berlinger, not well, but may have done a screening on one of his films. Would have to check.\nI am around all day tomorrow.\nxoxo Peggy"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 3:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Patterson , the Perversion of Justice Team, and the guy making the 'Ted Bundy' film --- sounds like a potential hagiography"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "berlinger is a bit of a hack. when you get a moment give me a call"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "and Patterson's not!!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 9:55:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "patterson book on my a flop and his work with clinton worse. hes old. but has a name. there is also john conally. hes on it as well"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt_16254
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 6:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "birthday/?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes! You beat my family. (How'd you know?)\nI celebrated in Beijing by (i) developing the Sleep/Dream proposal we discussed, (ii) lunch with an MNC CEO, and (iii) playing two hours of intense table tennis with a top coach."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you mentioned it at my house. unfortunately , I cant avoid remembering numbers"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You've got a jumbo-sized right superior parietal lobe.\nhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-brains-have-a-map-for-numbers/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "for me it is tied to music. beethovens fifth, is 555-3 . though unbeknownst to most people the first note ( you can verify, bu looking at the score ) , is a rest note ( silent ) so 0-555-3"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Didn't know. Meaning of the rest note?\nMahler's 5th opens with the same rhythmic motif (but 4th note is the same as the first three, not lower as in Beethoven's) - Mahler's 5th is my favorite symphony."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "its not ba ba ba- bah. its regular (ba ) ba ba ba - bah. regular four eighth notes , but the first is not sounded . changes the whole dynamic and wildly misunderstood"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I almost get it...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun (transient) with Trump-China: \n\"What China Thinks of President-Elect Trump\" broadcast on CCTV News, discussion with former Chinese ambassador to U.S. and head of Chinese Association of American studies - streamed - \nhttp://english.cnty.cn/2016/11/13NIDEytqdltlf30eFnd6vTIxy161113.shtml  \nInterview - http://www.atimes.com/article/china-wants-build-relations-dealmaker-trump/ \nMore fun (enduring) with Closer To Truth; working new episodes from FQXi conference (e.g., \"Physics of the Observer\", \"Physics of Consciousness\", \"Quantum Cosmology of the Beginning?\", Philosophy of Cosmology); progressing on \"Sleep & Dreams\". \nIn LA for 2 weeks, then back to China; NY in January. You there then? \nLove to get your sense of Trump's administration, policies. \nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 4:35:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "there are no policies yet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt_16258
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 140 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 1:43:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt_16259
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt
subject: Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 9:25:10 PM", "subject": "Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!", "body": "Donald Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia\nClinton attacks Trump's foreign policy as 'dangerously incoherent' 1 / 27U.S. Democratic presidential candidate\nHillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump's foreign policy platform as \"dangerously incoherent\" in a speech on\nThursday that cast her Republican rival as both a dangerous and laughable figure.\nA former U.S. secretary of state, Clinton attacked Trump for his policies and his character, suggesting Trump\nmight start a nuclear war if elected to the White House simply because \"someone got under his very thin skin.\"\n\"Donald Trump's ideas are not just different, they are dangerously incoherent,\" she said to a room of supporters\nin San Diego, California. \"They're not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and\noutright lies.\"\n____0 Mike Blake U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech on national\nsecurity in San Diego, California, United States June 2, 2016.\nClinton, the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, delivered her speech as\nshe seeks to shift her attention to the Nov. 8 election against likely rival Trump and away from Bernie Sanders,\na U.S. senator from Vermont, who is continuing his longshot bid for the nomination.\nTrump, the Republicans' presumptive nominee, has said he would sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong\nUn to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program and has criticized the decades-old NATO alliance with mainly\nEuropean nations as obsolete and too costly for the United States.\nClinton derided these and other positions, promising she would do a better job keeping the United States safe\nand standing in front of a backdrop of 19 large U.S. flags, an unusual abundance even by the standards of\npresidential campaign events.\nTrump, a billionaire businessman who has never held elected office or worked in government before, says he\nhas experience dealing with foreign governments through setting up hotels, resorts, golf courses and beauty\npageants in foreign countries. Clinton, who is also a former U.S. senator and former first lady, mocked this.\n\"He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,\" she said to loud\nlaughter.\nTrump has talked tough on foreign policy. He has said he would bring back waterboarding and other brutal\ninterrogation techniques for terrorism suspects that are widely regarded as torture and were discontinued by\nDemocratic President Barack Obama.\nHe has also vowed to renegotiate trade deals, called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country, and\nsaid he would ask members of the 28-nation NATO alliance to \"pay up\" or \"get out.\"\nTrump has criticized Clinton for her handling of foreign policy during her 2009-2013 stint as foreign secretary,\nincluding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that\nkilled the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.\nHe cites Clinton's support for the Iraq war - launched by former Republican President George W. Bush - as\nanother example of her shortcomings.\nAt a rally Wednesday night in Sacramento, California, Trump said he had seen a copy of Clinton's speech and\n\"it was such lies about my foreign policy.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt_16265
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Sirs", "Ce: Nick Pykc Si Li: Hartley"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names pnd other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nui further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact\ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:10:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt_16266
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2017 3:39:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Appreciate consideration. I’m next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really\nlike to do something (important) together.\n\nJust arrived in Beijing for the “The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation” (commentating), the\n\nsecond most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not\npaying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you , but sleep is not going to\nbe it.. Ihave read quite alot and frankly , the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights. just more\nquestions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now\nbecoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own( yet )."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt_16271
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"Wolfe, Alexandra\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\nJay"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mike Sitrick"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt_16273
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another \nman, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we \nwant to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this \nbehalf?\n\nThank you in advance.\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt_16287
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt
subject: Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahr", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/15/2018 1:09:39 AM", "subject": "Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'", "body": "https://pagesix.com/2018/09/14/steve-bannon-was-supposed-to-appear-in-michael-moores-fahrenheit-1 1-9/?_ga=2.179263469.891655311.1536972901-2116259238.1278814960\n\nSteve Bannon almost appeared in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'\n\nSteve Bannon was invited to be in Michael Moore’s latest documentary, “Fahrenheit 11/9,” and while the former White House strategist declined to go on camera, he did meet with Moore for two hours, the filmmaker revealed after the film’s NYC premiere.\n\nAfter a Lincoln Center screening, Moore, at a Tavern on the Green party, revealed Bannon was almost in the film. “We wanted Steve Bannon to answer that first question in the film: ‘How the f—k did this happen?’ ” the liberal gadfly told guests.\n\n“It took a long time. We finally got him to come over, no cameras ... He said he wanted to talk to me first. And we talked to him for two hours.”\n\nUltimately, Bannon decided not to go on camera, but the conversation had a seismic impact on the finished film anyway.\n\n“He said something very profound to us, and it changed us and it changed the course of the film,” Moore said of Bannon. “I asked him, ‘How did you pull this [Trump’s election] off?’ And he said, ‘It’s a very easy answer. Our side, we go for the head wound. Your side, you have pillow fights.’ ”\n\nMoore continued, “That so {-ked us up to hear him say that ... watching him smirk as he said it. As soon as he left, we decided to watch the film ... and put the pillow fight filter.”\n\nOne example Moore gave of a change to his film post-Bannon was a line about news networks being run by men, from “most” to “all.”\n\n“It’s amazing how we talk as liberals. We always want to be nice and maybe be fair,” Moore explained.\n\nThe film also jabs at the media, highlighting major newsmen who have turned out to be predators, including Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt_16291
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt
subject: Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:27:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "did you get your money?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!!\nhttps://bossip.com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-her-pornographic-pleasure-pocket-43081/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt_16296
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt
subject: RE: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 4:41:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello", "body": "That sucks..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Gwendolyn Beck"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "impossisble to get rid of"}, {"sender": "Ivy", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate @)? I moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich\nas there was a fabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I’m going to try\nto get on with Trump as an advisor. He’s going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of\nSenior Financial Abuse in CA and FL.\n\nAlso, starting a new company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the\nearlier we catch it the better. I’ve been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it’s\nremarkable the results I’ve been able to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with\npeople/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about getting the best care. I stress ‘serious’ because I don’t want\nto get into a situation like as last summer.\n\nHow is Fred? It’s just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding\na school for his son... I think of where Fred could be today, and instead he’s probably locked up in his\napartment with no help that has dementia training — he probably thinks he’s crazy by now. Know you like Joe,\nbut it was sad sad sad that he didn’t let me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were\nthe truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie Madoff too)....\n\nAnyway — the past. I’m charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it’s all highly\nconfidential. A customized ‘mind-body’ enhancement to achieve the most out of one’s life! And, training for\nthe family to help transition to the ‘new reality’ with their loved one with later stage dementia.\n\nI’m in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator’s Club, and will stay over the\nweekend. Love to see you if you’re in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company -\n\nbut Joe probably won’t let that happen (3).\n\nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness, Gwendolyn"}]


