# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt_17656
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 5:25:55 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I’m here until August ~11 if your schedule changes.\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\n\nLatest China -\n\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-\nbromance-cools/\n\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021509.txt_17669
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021509.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": "6... e", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008", "body": "LEAD (s) :\nSet Lead 1: .(Info)\nMIAMI\nAT MIAMI, FL\n\nParty Draft is requested to issue AFI\nan advance check in the amount of\nto\n\nmade payable to \"Delaware Secretary of State\" in order b3\naPIL will provide an invoice for these records once BIC\n\nobtained from the Delaware Secretary of State. It should be\nnoted that the receipt of the invoice will take 14 to 20 days."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt_17672
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Woli"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:23:41 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "of course ok to both. . ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT \ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I \nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and \nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy \nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. \nAre you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt_17675
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here goes:\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 6:40:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Darren Indyke\nAlso think there should be a line in there somewhere which clearly confirms that JE understands and recognizes\nthat he did something wrong"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032061.txt_17680
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032061.txt
subject: Re: nuts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael", "Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 8, 2016 9:24 PM", "subject": "nuts", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 3:26:04 AM", "subject": "Re: nuts", "body": "Yup"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032611.txt_17681
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032611.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 10:25:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a new school.. \nif you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday \nthnx again"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033269.txt_17700
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033269.txt
subject: Porn star: Trump said I reminded him of lyanka after sex New York Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/17/2018 7:08:41 PM", "subject": "Porn star: Trump said I reminded him of lyanka after sex New York Post", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/01/17/porn-star-detailed-alleged-affair-with-trump-in-2011-interview/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015002.txt_17708
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015002.txt
subject: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Rich Beckler, \nKen Adams, \nDo you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. \nBeckler, as most Friday nights, no? \nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from \nmy being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was \non the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance \nand association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see \nbelow); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-\nfiled case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being \ntracked. \nYou both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom, \nGhislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Ainbanklaw Info", "Patrick M. Regan", "Denyse Sabagh", "Michael Baxter", "Robert Barnett", "Weingarten, Reid", "Ellen Kerns"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 4:46:06 PM", "subject": "Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030662.txt_17710
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030662.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid I", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 5:44:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In between"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029923.txt_17712
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029923.txt
subject: Re: Happy bertday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:12:29 -0400", "subject": "Re: Happy bertday", "body": "Jeff: have a great day on the island (or PB?). Getting to together with Dr Frog tonight."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:20:45 -0400", "subject": "Re: Happy bertday", "body": "Tough"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeff epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/20/2014 4:26:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Happy bertday", "body": "Hah! I completely forgot he always had that complex as a kid. Now its cool to be a mixed breed. \nTrump has a gd pool. Swimming laps now 5/6 days/wk. Staying in good shape. \nWhy don't you do a boxing/workout session with philip sometime at mendez gym in mid town. He's into boxing \nwith the spics."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032605.txt_17715
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032605.txt
subject: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:33:39 PM", "subject": "Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25m unique readers) \nwould like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. \nWould you be open to talk to them?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030892.txt_17717
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030892.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 2:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "re vanity fair, paul seems imbalanced,, so many intricate computing details but fuzzy on reality. He seems like\na wife that has been divorced for a younger girl . re woody allen,, my fault,, Charlie rose was also there. he"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 6:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "not nice for bill. It just makes choosing new friends even more difficult"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 1:36:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Not nice at all. Just wait to see the book. It is disgusting,\n>From someone whom he help made 30B.\n\nAnd who was silent out the whole issue for 27 years, pretending to be a great friend.\nAt least try to discuss/solve the problem outside the entre press.\n| do feel sorry for Bill.\n\nHow do you choose your close friend? Whom to trust?\nB\n\nAgree.\nThe book is much worst — it is coming out April 19th.\n\nWill tell you more.\n\nTry Consuelo — I can’t think of other people right now in Paris. Few that I might interest you are traveling.\n\nIam so being answering on Consuelo’s emails that you are better off to contact her directly.\nSteve will know many interesting people in Paris. He has great circle there.\n\nB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029752.txt_17729
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029752.txt
subject: a JokeLand E-Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "jokeland@aol.com [jokeland@aol.com]", "recipients": ["jokeland@aol.com"], "timestamp": "5/9/2015 7:17:32 PM", "subject": "a JokeLand E-Mail", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033255.txt_17734
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033255.txt
subject: Dylan Love of TNW & Business Insider
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2017 8:27:09 PM", "subject": "Dylan Love of TNW & Business Insider", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, I was happy to meet you this morning. \nperson) \nYou asked to see some things I've written. Here's my (only slightly out of date) professional web presence, including \nLetterman clip: \nwww.thedylanlove.com  \nHere are a few stories I've written more recently that are not displayed on my site: \nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/33173-virtual-reality-psychedelic-drugs  \nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/11766-how-instant-translation-tech-will-change-the-way-the-world-talks-and-listens \nhttps://thenextweb.com/contributors/2017/09/14/russians-use-technology-influence-elections  \nhttp://www.businessinsider.com/quantum-technologies-conference-2017-8  \nYou might get a special kick out of this Trump story: \nhttps://www.inverse.com/article/20029-transhumanist-presidential-candidate-zoltan-istvan-donald-trump-new-technologies \nWhat kinds of media goals/story ideas are interesting to you? Masha has made it clear that she wants me to write \nsomething about you, but that's much more your call to make. I suggest that there is mileage to be gained by quoting you \nin a story about how proper implementation of cryptocurrency might solve financial corruption issues. \nI travel back to Austin, Texas tomorrow evening, but am of course reachable. Thanks again for your time this morning. \n-Dylan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031226.txt_17741
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031226.txt
subject: Fwd: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C Ehnborn", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/18/2012 4:11:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep\n\nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this\n\nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\n\nBut he is a bit busy I gather!\n\nAnyway, hope iJ got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail\n\nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific\nagenda and she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\n\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\n\nLet me know what you think!\n\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend\nGoldsamt! First prize for perseverance!\n\nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful!\n\nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!\n\nKRAM\nBE"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt_17742
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt
subject: Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/15/2016 12:09:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "Did you write this ?C)"}, {"sender": "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "recipients": ["#C-M EMIRATES NBD - LW TEAM"], "timestamp": "Monday, Aug 15, 2016, 12:57 AM", "subject": "FW: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "AmLaw Daily story just posted. See below."}, {"sender": "Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "recipients": ["Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (LA)", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR)", "Cleaves, John"], "timestamp": "Sunday, Aug 14, 2016, 9:51 PM", "subject": "Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "I'll soon send a cleaner version of this and other coverage, but wanted to share the article just posted in the AmLaw Litigation Daily. A personal thanks to Dan for speaking to the reporter, and Nima for feeding us case documents and insights.\nhttp://m.litigationdaily.com/#/article/1202765052511/1/A%20Master%20at%20Work:%20Dissecting%20the%20Closing%20Argument%20in%20Latham's%20Huge%20Win%20for%20Middle%20Eastern%20Bank"}, {"sender": "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "recipients": ["Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (LA)", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Saturday, August 13, 2016 1:34 PM", "subject": "RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "OC Business Journal article with a nice shout out to Dean:\nhttp://www.ocbj .com/news/2016/aug/12/jury-decides-against-sjc-firm/"}, {"sender": "Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (LA)", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM", "subject": "Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029020.txt_17743
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029020.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "EE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 11:02:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tried to call you. Sorry...It's crazy that they bringing this bullshit up again?!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033241.txt_17747
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033241.txt
subject: yikes
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 6:36:57 PM", "subject": "yikes", "body": "I'm against censorship, and that includes Kathy Griffin. CNN eats chickenshit. What she did is nothing compared to Trump's murderous evil. P.S. THIS LITERALLY REEKS WITH IRONY...THIS IS WHERE CNN GETS ITS CHICKENSHIT. A COMMERCIAL THAT THEY'RE LOSING BECAUSE OF KATHY: SQUATTY POTTY - KATHY GRIFFIN \"FULL OF SHIT\" (2017) (USA) 09 May, 201/ By Dabitch 0 Comments Second week of May this Kathy Griffin ad rolls out digital media only, where Kathy tells people that they are \"full of shit.\" Literally. See, Kathy Griffin has a potty mouth but also a selling point - the reason you'd use the squatty potty is to properly empty your bowels. \"It's like a colonic\" she explains, but without that hose up your ass. A cute blue turd bleeps her potty mouth but the point is still made. You may remember Squatty Potty's pooping unicorn video created by the Harmon Brothers in 2015. Now Kathy Griffin is their first celebrity spokesperson. The brand's CEO and co-creator, Bobby Edwards, finds her quirky, brave and fearless, which makes her a good ambassador for the brand as they target women with this campaign. Edwards says the brand team fell in love with the \"full of shit\" idea from Bravery Films, \"it got the biggest laughs\" from staff. Howie Ronay, Bravery Films' founder and chief creative officer, a former FCB exec who worked on the 2013 viral hit \"Ship My Pants\" for Kmart explains: \"We know a lot of people struggle with this issue, and we decided to take a common colloquial phrase and use it literally.\" Basically, this is \"ship my pants II.\" Enough about poop, not all ads can be great."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030217.txt_17748
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030217.txt
subject: Flight time OMAA - BQK
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoskii", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kah"], "timestamp": "9/5/2016 7:10:16 PM", "subject": "Flight time OMAA - BQK", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nEric completed Trump's interior on his 757 at Stambaugh, they have worked together in the past.\n\nEstimated cost Abu Dhabi to Stambaugh $37,038.00\n\nAbu Dhabi - Shannon Ireland 7+45min (-23kt Headwind)\nShannon - Jacksonville (to clear Customs) 7+46min (-23kt headwind)\nJacksonville to Brunswick GA +12min\n\nTotal Flight time 15+42min\n\nCost\nBBJ burns an average of 5,200Lbs per hour = 776 gallons per hour\n\nAbu Dhabi current fuel price $1.74 per gallon.\nShannon Current fuel price. $1.94 per gallon.\nJacksonville Fuel, $3.50 per gallon.\n\nAbu Dhabi - Shannon, 7.7 hours = 5,975 gallons = $10,396.50 Fuel\n\nShannon -Jacksonville 7.7 hours = 5975 gallons = $11,591.50 Fuel\n\nJacksonville-Brunswick .2 hours= 300 gallons= $ 1,050.00 Fuel\n\nHandling charge in Shannon estimate $ 3,500.00\n\nNavigational charges, overflight permits, landing\n\nFee Shannon Ireland. $10,000.00 est.\nLanding fee Jacksonville. $ 500.00\n\nEstimated total\n\n$ 37,038.00"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030886.txt_17752
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030886.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon\nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:29:14 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031540.txt_17754
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031540.txt
subject: Subject to change
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 10:02:03 PM", "subject": "Subject to change", "body": "So the publisher wants me to trim down 700 to 400 pages in “The Best of...” collection. Tsk tsk. Below will be\nthe revised mini-essay to serve as the final piece. Although I detest Trump, to be fair, I realized, thanks to\n\nyou, that I had no evidence that he had raped a 13-year-old, though I did have have evidence that, as an adult,\n\nthere was evidence that she made an accusation. Also, I added another sentence with a positive ending.\nMeanwhile, Happy Earth Day.\n\nThe Last Word: Yikes!\nWhen George W. Bush was elected president in the year 2000, it was due to the electoral college (a rigged system\n\nwhich originally intended to prevent slaves from voting and evolved to gerrymandering), even though Bush’s\nopponent, Al Gore, won the national popular vote. Hillary Clinton was elected senator that year, and she\nannounced that the first thing she would do was to get rid of the electoral college. A few years later, as a columnist\n\nfor the New York Press, I sent her a letter asking about the status of that promise. She didn’t reply.\n\nOn November 8, 2016, a crooked businessman, liar extraordinaire, bragging pussy-grabber, make-America-\nwhite-again, anti-choice, anti-Semite, fake Christian, accused rapist of a 13-year-old in 1994 (she canceled a press\nconference one week before the election because of death threats if she filed a lawsuit), climate-change hoaxer,\ntwitter addict, homophobic, apprentice politician, fucking fascist, and Vladimir Putin’s “useful idiot,” namely\nDonald Trump, who was elected as an insanely narcissistic dictator based on the electoral college, whereas his\n\nopponent, Hillary Clinton, won the national popular vote by almost three million individuals galore, to no avail.\n\nIrony lives. But the monster has inadvertently awakened a population to resist."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032581.txt_17764
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032581.txt
subject: science in Trump time
messages:
  [{"sender": "ron", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 2:46:08 AM", "subject": "science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've\nstarted a new PR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time.\n\nIt can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you © But what I really like\nit's actually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031230.txt_17765
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031230.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 131 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Bennet J. Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 1:37:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033257.txt_17767
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033257.txt
subject: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/16/2017 5:12:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "September 24, 2017 \nTrump's urging that some NFL players be fired could cost him 15 years \nin prison \nLegal Information Institute \n1. U.S. Code ) Title 18 ) Part I ) Chapter 11 ) § 227 \n18 U.S. Code § 227 - Wrongfully influencing a private entity's employment decisions by a \nMember of Congress or an officer or employee of the legislative or executive branch \n• US Code \n• Notes \n(a) Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely \n on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment \npractice of any private entity—\n(1 \ntakes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or \n(2) \ninfluences, or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another, shall be fined \nunder this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be \ndisqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. \n(b) In this section, the term \"covered government person\" means—\n(1) \na Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the \nCongress; \n(2) \nan employee of either House of Congress; or \n(3) \nthe President, Vice President, an employee of the United States Postal Service or the \nPostal Regulatory Commission, or any other executive branch employee (as such \nterm is defined under section 2105 of title 5, United States Code). \nI sent the Attn: Mueller re Trump crime to these journalists: \nAP John Rogers — on vacation \nNY Times \nLA Times \nWashington Post \nVillage Voice \nSyndicated Sports columnist \nand Al Franken:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt_17780
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "ME", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:13:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to\nTrump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\n\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd...I have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031556.txt_17784
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031556.txt
subject: Re: sorry
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/27/2018 12:09:48 AM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "They claimed they had 1500 hits for their announcement about me and buzzfeed, which doesn’t seem like a lot,\nbut they thought so, and they are getting pressure from various of their supporters and senior people.. this\nthree week thing may be true, but I wonder if I will ever really recover.. I wish they would indict Trump or\n\nsomething right now.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 26, 2018, at 4:06 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "yikes"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:05 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "I had my call with the Bulletin, I am going to take a voluntary leave as Chair of the Board.. allowing me and them to make nice\nstatements about me and how the board appreciates me, has never had a complaint, how professional I am, and how they hope I will\n\nreturn after this has subsided.. The alternative was worse."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022684.txt_17786
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022684.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:05:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did you see this?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030890.txt_17787
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030890.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 12:16:17 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Agree.\nThe book is much worst — it is coming out April 19th.\nWill tell you more.\n\nTry Consuelo — I can’t think of other people right now in Paris. Few that I might interest you are traveling.\nI am so being answering on Consuelo’s emails that you are better off to contact her directly.\n\nSteve will know many interesting people in Paris. He has great circle there.\n\nB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 2:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "re vanity fair, paul seems imbalanced,, so many intricate computing details but fuzzy on reality. He seems like\na wife that has been divorced for a younger girl . re woody allen,, my fault,, Charlie rose was also there. he\nhas a big mouth.-- wasn't there a science person or someone that worked with consuelo that you thought\nintersting?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence.\n\nIam curious what you think about Vanity fair piece?\n\nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew?\n\nWho would know that? Some of your employees?\n\nB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "in paris,, emailed steve - no response yet,, you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be\naneye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. .\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\n\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016595.txt_17797
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016595.txt
subject: Re: ARCOM
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirk Blouin", "recipients": ["John Page", "Police Code Enforcement"], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ARCOM", "body": "JP,\n\nHere is a copy of the minutes from the April CEB hearing. Each month thereafter the case was postponed because we were aware that it was being brought to ARCOM. Now that this matter has been resolved with ARCOM we will proceed with a code enforcement case until the property is in compliance (meaning they plant the shrubbery and hedges approved by the Town).\n\nSgt. Krauel or Rob Walton will be available on July 23rd as I will be attending a conference.\n\nH. Case # 08-2484, 515 N. County Road, Trump Properties, LLC\n\nViolation of Chapter 18, Section 18-205 of the Town of Palm Beach Code of Ordinances, the Architectural Commission may attach conditions to any approval it grants (Declaration of Use Agreement).\n\nLead Code Enforcement Walton presented the facts of the case and said the previous owner of the property, Abe Gosman, had been granted approval by the Architectural Commission to do some remodeling. One of the conditions of this approval was that the hedge along the front of the property be maintained in the condition it was in at the time the approval was granted. This agreement was a binding agreement, which passes on to any subsequent property owner. The agreement was made January 31, 1990. The subsequent buyer of this property was Mr. Trump, Trump Properties, LLC and some remodeling work was done, removing the previous hedge. A new hedge was planted to replace the original hedge and that one has now been removed. This is a violation of the agreement. A letter was received from Mr. Royce, representing Mr. Trump, asking for a postponement of today’s hearing. The Town does not feel this matter should be postponed.\n\nMr. Randolph summarized the letter from Mr. Royce which indicated the ficus hedge keeps dying and they want to replace it with something different. They plan on hiring a landscape architect to go before the next Architectural Commission meeting to get approval to install a hedge in an attempt to meet the conditions of the declaration of use agreement. Mr. Randolph said he had discussions with Mr. Royce and Mr. Walton and Mr. Royce was told the Town could not recommend a postponement and the recommendation would be that they are found in violation, assessed the $150.00 in administrative costs and be given until June 18th, which is the day before the June Code Enforcement Board meeting, to comply. This would give them the opportunity to appear before the Architectural Commission to see if they can get approval to re-plant a hedge. The hedge has to be installed to the height which existed at the time of the agreement which Mr. Randolph said he believed was twenty-two (22) feet. Mr. Randolph said Mr. Royce was not present today because he had a planned vacation.\n\nMOTION BY MR. FRIED TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON-COMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF $150.00 AND GIVE THEM UNTIL JUNE 18, 2008 TO COMPLY.\n\nSECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt_17802
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt
subject: Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg Esq"], "timestamp": "3/3/2011 5:54:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "March 2, 2011 3:19:39 PM PST", "subject": "From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": "Here are some questions. Thanks again for your help! Would love to talk to him, or travel to meet with him if that would be possible.\n\n• Darren Indyke [1111111111111.1111111111,\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his \ninterest in science and the 2011 grants/conference? \n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it \nstill at $15 billion? \n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising? \n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? \n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? Someone said she lives with him (but that doesn't sound right)? \n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? \n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why? \n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive? \n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030215.txt_17803
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030215.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2014, at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any interest in woody allen"}, {"sender": "Peter Thicl [peterthiel@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Would be cool to meet him sometime, but don't go out of the way to make this happen...\nAre we planning something the weekend of the 13th-14th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2014 11:53:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "13 thafternoon youandI. then bill burns . the diplmats diplomat. eveing dinner with woody all casual.. if\nyou choose we can bring in kathy ruemmler. former obama counsel for 5 years. and or sen Bob\nkerrey, former senate intellignece"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033243.txt_17804
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033243.txt
subject: Donald Trump Can't Close Deal, Failing Salesman I National Review
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/30/2017 3:11:00 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump Can't Close Deal, Failing Salesman I National Review", "body": "http://amp.nationalreview.com/article/449988/donald-trump-cant-close-deal-failing-\nsalesman?utm_source=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_medium=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_campaign=PANTHEON_STRIPPED"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt_17810
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt
subject: Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?
messages:
  [{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2019 9:34:40 AM", "subject": "Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\nDo French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?\n\nAnswer: I am not French, I am Spanish, so my answer will be about my own impre...\n\n[followed by newsletter content with Quora stories and unsubscribe information]"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032595.txt_17812
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032595.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "x", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "rote", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:42:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt_17814
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes, i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "'Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "'of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt_17821
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid J", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid J", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil ina fundamental way"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "shouldnt mueller just file sealed indicments against jared ivanka and junior? they would stay even if he were fired."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid J", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:31:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yup"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032063.txt_17824
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032063.txt
subject: Re: nuts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miller, Michael PO", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Weingarten, Reid", "Darren Indykc xy"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 1:52:26 AM", "subject": "Re: nuts", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["as"], "timestamp": "October 8, 2016 9:24 PM", "subject": "nuts", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt_17827
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt
subject: Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "fe [triversr@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/11/2018 5:34:33 PM", "subject": "Update", "body": "miss chatting with you\n\nam back at work; will give keynote to the Louisiana State Psychological Association\nin early November and next day meet with department heads and deans for three local Universities, Tulane,\nNew Orleans, Louisiana State to see if some kind of 3-year deal can be worked out\n\nthen off to U Texas at Austin and Texas A&M, to which 1 have never been—biology is very strong in genetics\nand they may be interested—i will lecture to them on Recent Advances in Human Evolutionary Genetics, a\nspecialty of mine\n\ni attach latest version of Honour Killings—key is to look at are the PHOTOS—the women are almost without\nfail beautiful\n\ngiven that i was perhaps a little cruel or frenetic over Jim Watson i attach a short remembrance of his other side,\nFrancis Crick, a much more broad-minded and friendly organism\n\ni don't give one shit about race and IQ by the way—and 1 hope it is clear that VARIANCE in genetic traits of all\n\nvarieties is expected to be especially high in Africa—hence it is the source of all successful hominid\ninvasions—but i am saying nothing about AVERAGE difference in intelligence or anything else\n\ni will shortly send you a piece onTrump as a narcissistic sociopath\n\nfinally here is a joke for you—we are both, 1 believe, politically—and not sexually—polymorphic perverse so\nthere should be no problem with this character\n\nhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/blindfold-sex-men-trick-dating-app-ana-duarte-xavier-straight-\na8571076.html\n\nall best\n\np.s. please remember to tell me when to take my money out of the market !!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt_17828
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "____________________________", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. Would you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes happy to do in person"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:59:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie?\nI'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029778.txt_17829
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029778.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayr"], "timestamp": "10/16/2009 11:20:59 AM", "subject": null, "body": "just as we thought------ Russian bank Sberbank has quietly taken over his Capital Group's biggest asset, a massive housing, shops and offices project called Gorod Stolits, in Moskva-City on Moscow's outskirts. Under a $400 million (£270 million) loan agreement, the bank will ensure construction of the complex goes ahead at the end of the year as planned by Doronin, who has been likened to Donald Trump."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030229.txt_17834
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030229.txt
subject: Fw: Daily Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gmax", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 12 2011 02:15 AM", "subject": "Fw: Daily Mail", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["G Maxwell", "Kevin Maxwell", "Gareth Thompson"], "timestamp": "Thu Mar 10 16:29:24 2011", "subject": "Re: Daily Mail", "body": "Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay\n\ncriminals if it is in the public interest.\n\nMaz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public\n\ninterest cos there was say, a bent detective.\n\nBelow is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted.\n\n15\nWitness payments in criminal trials\n\n1) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who\nmay reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made\nin any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of\nCourt Act 1981.\n\nThis prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed\nunconditionally by police without charge or bail or the proceedings\nare otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court;\nor, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has announced its\nverdict.\n\n*i1) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and\n\nforeseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who\nmay reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the\ninformation concerned ought demonstrably to be published in the public\ninterest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment\n\nfor this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to\n\nensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those witnesses\ngive. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the\noutcome of a trial.\n\n*ii1) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to\ngive evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to the prosecution and"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030660.txt_17836
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030660.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt_17847
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Gates", "Larry Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19 2015 09:48 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I guess i won't be able to run for office for a while. . the forbes 400 list is now over 3 trillion in wealth that will be transfered. obama will try to void the step -up, it won't pass this time, but more of an impetus for some, ( though hardly needed )."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt_17849
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt
subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012", "subject": "Happy new year!", "body": "All the best in new year.\nFor more fun in new year.\nAnd for little Jeffrey soon to come ;-)\nThank you for being such a great friend\nGoing to sleep. Still in Bangkok.\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 05:53 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jean Luc Brunel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Wait a minute!!! Am I missing something?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 07:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Nonono/ just wanted you to that iris was also in Bangkok. I forgot about the Boris wish"}, {"sender": "Jean Luc Brunel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/1/2013 12:51:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Saved for 2012 but I can start to look for baby clothes if the wish turns into reality. Or would you stick with RL baby\naround the corner? Forgot that you r planning everything\nI will send you picture of the Burmese girl. Very pretty She is the star singer in Myamar. I will bring her to US. Obama\nvisits Myamar and Chan Chan comes to America. I think that I have something new and fresh news to promote"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030525.txt_17850
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030525.txt
subject: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-j-effrey-ep-stein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaircom/contributors/vicky-ward> March 8,2011, 2:30 PM \"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.\" So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you, Vicky,\" was his riposte. I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot ofthings. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true. When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. And Ghislaine? Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has been open about. So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032542.txt_17857
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032542.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 7:17:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031595.txt_17861
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031595.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Pe"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:49:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "research how he paid for maralago _. matt was his bagman, , trump shuttle.. trump casino review sec filing\nto see the backdates taking of money"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Po", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die.\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\n\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt_17865
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["Summers, Lawrence H."], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population....\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\nI'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network or think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. I kid you not. their view. how else ,could one explain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:46:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Lot of ruin in a nation"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032834.txt_17871
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032834.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 7:28:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not a stupid point...he is starting to behave very erratically...."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don, ignores the fact that he has great \ndangerous power. . tightening the noose too slowly, risks a very bad situation. . gambino was never the \ncommander in chief there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt_17895
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gerald Barton [a@domain.com]", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/23/2014 12:07:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nThank you for the kindness shown to me and my family in the periodic availability of the New York apartment.\nLesley has done an admirable job in making us feel welcome and always with good cheer.\n\nSome years ago, we talked about the opportunity to use Landmark's $166 million tax loss. At that time, my\nambition, ego, or stupidity limited the discussion. My memory is you, after discussions with Larry Summers,\ndecided the pursuit was not worth the prey. Now, age (which I laughingly call maturity) or new information,\nhas opened doors that I believe we can now accomplish the goals we discussed some years ago.\n\nIf, at a time and place of your convenience, you had 30 minutes for me to outline the fundamentals of the plan,\nyou would know what I believe would work and if your mental quickness is still there, you would know\nwhether or not you wanted to proceed. Certainly, when the goal is so great, 30 minutes with an old friend is not\na great sacrifice.\n\nOn a personal note, your friend, Larry Summers, recently gave a meaningful speech in Toronto entitled \"Will\n2014 End Up Like 1914\". You may find it worth reading. Your friend, Donald Trump recently purchased a\nproject we developed on the west coast of Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been consistently rated the best\nresort in Europe.\n\nJeffrey, please let me know when and where this is convenient for you.\nJerry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt_17898
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cathy Alexander", "recipients": ["Miles Alexander"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "To: Martin Weinberg, Esq.\n\nDear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island's manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,\n\nMiles Alexander"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "MGW"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 8:11:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt_17900
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayern"], "timestamp": "9/3/2009 11:18:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she is your second biggest fan... iam the first. 1 sell dubai, to its detractors."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "An interesting piece to read before you start your weekend. Guest Post by Jim Krane: Dubai, Not Obama, is the Mideast's Best Peace Hope"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032556.txt_17901
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032556.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "catch up today?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Buying a new kayak...hard negotiations going on...will call when | am done...Rudy next ag..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "1 340 775 8111"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 1:51:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033280.txt_17906
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033280.txt
subject: New Yorker
messages:
  [{"sender": "Vincenzo lozzo", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 9:40:46 PM", "subject": "New Yorker", "body": "I think this is a very good article in case you missed https://www.newyorker.cominews/news-desk/michael-\ncohen-and-the-end-stage-of-the-trump-presidency"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt_17912
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling go
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["1S"], "timestamp": "May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling go", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our\nfriendship asa source,. thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS [lhsummers@???.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling go", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising. very hard to be law firm\nrepresenting POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling go", "body": "prospectus"}, {"sender": "LHS [lhsummers@???.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling go", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\n\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago.\n2?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 7:46:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling go", "body": "Lisa biz"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031607.txt_17919
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031607.txt
subject: Re: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ed"], "timestamp": "12/19/2015 2:28:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories", "body": "could i pay you to organzie my story into a coherent presentation. . probaly a six- 9 moth job."}, {"sender": "Ed", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:36 PM", "subject": "Re: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories", "body": "Happy New Year\nEd"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030519.txt_17921
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030519.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:48:24 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Details of the disturbing lifestyle led by Jeffrey Epstein emerged last night after the Daily \nMail uncovered logs of telephone messages left at his Florida child sex den. \nSchoolchildren were among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages \nfor the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex \noffences. \nGhislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, is \nnamed in several messages. \nIn one left for her or 'Sarah', a caller says she 'doesn't know at what time she must come \nthis night for the massage'. Other messages for Epstein, the sources of which are not clear, \ncontain such phrases as: 'She has females for Mr JE' and 'I have a female for him'. \nAnother with sickening overtones comes from someone called Jeanluc for Epstein: 'He just \ndid a good one — 18 years. (She spoke to me and said, \"I love Jeffrey\")'. \nThe long list of women is punctuated by regular references to Epstein's celebrity friends \nincluding the business magnate Donald Trump, film producer Harvey Weinstein and \nmagician David Copperfield, referred to as 'Magic David'. \nThe sheer volume of phone traffic shows the frequency of Epstein's massages, many of \nwhich were 'erotic' and allegedly involved the abused girls. \nThe evidence is from documents confiscated by police during a criminal investigation into \nEpstein and seen yesterday by the Mail. \nMessage from a child asking what time to leave school \n---n-----e-__ \nMiss Maxwell is asked when a girl should give a massage \nOne message left for Epstein reads: 'She is wondering if 2.30 ok cuz she needs to stay in \nschool.' \nIt was left in February 2005 — the same year that the mother of a 14-year-old girl alerted \npolice to Epstein's abuse. \nAnother note shows that 'Colleen' phoned to tell Epstein: 'Going into class — will be out in \n45 mm.' \nLast night the Daily Mail tried to contact the people whose names and telephone numbers \nare included in the logs. \nOne girl named Jenny, who had left her number, hung up immediately when asked about \nEpstein. \nA man listed only as Darren said: 'I have no comment to make on that.' \nRead more: http ://www. dailymail. co .uk/news/article-13 640 1 0/Did-Prince-Andrew-fix-Fergies-bailout-\nBillionaire-paid-debts-days-princes-visit.html#ixzzlFyMDA8If"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012631.txt_17922
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012631.txt
subject: RE: Conference Call with Bert Ocariz
messages:
  [{"sender": "A. Marie Villafaña", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/27/2007 03:06 PM", "subject": "RE: Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "Hi Jay — J already told Bert that there is no indictment and, as I mentioned, he doesn’t really need to/want to see the entire plea agreement, just the relevant paragraphs so that he understands what the scope of his representation will be. I think they would be happy knowing that their hourly rate will be paid when it is billed. The concern is, if all 40 girls decide they want to sue, they don’t want to be in a situation where Mr. Epstein says this is getting too expensive, we won’t pay any more attorneys’ fees.\n\nTwo suggestions, that I haven't run past Bert, are:\n\ni. Mr. Epstein signs a standard fee agreement, where one of his attorneys or accountants who is not working on the damages litigation receives a monthly bill with attorney's fees charged at an hourly rate and costs billed monthly. The bills will have any privileged information redacted. If there is a dispute about a bill that cannot be resolved, it will be submitted to a mediator for resolution.\n\n2. If that is too open-ended for Mr. Epstein, do the hourly/monthly billing until Bert has had a chance to confer with all of the girls to determine how many want him to represent them. Once it is known how many girls will be represented by Bert, and maybe who those girls are, there can be a more educated discussion about estimated fees and costs.\n\nJust some food for thought. I will be out of the office tomorrow, but I will be reachable by cell phone. I will make sure Bert is available and confirm the time with you."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "Marie - I will not be able to get back to you until tomorrow. However, some of the questions he raised cause me"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029977.txt_17924
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029977.txt
subject: Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "a", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabuyo", "Januiz Banasiak", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby", "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2012 2:41:02 PM", "subject": "Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "Lesley,\n\nPlease inform JEE, Vice President Biden is in West Palm Beach and is schedule to depart between 5pm and 6pm today. He parks at Galaxy ramp also in Palm Beach. The airport will be closed between 5pm and 6pm. Flight time is 2+21min.\n\nwe'll need wheels up at 4pm or 2pm. Pls advise which time je prefers?\n\nThank you,\n\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Larry", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabuyo", "Januiz Banasiak", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "Sep 28, 2012 10:33 AM", "subject": "3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "JE has moved wheels up to 3pm today!\nLArry, please confirm\n\nAlso, Larry please confirm you will organize pick up in PB upon the arrival today"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025100.txt_17938
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025100.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/21/2016 7:48:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ailes said he gave up trying to give advice, that Trump was the boy in pre-school who you just knew was going to throw a truck at another kid's head."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did trump also ignore ailes? wild"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033112.txt_17947
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033112.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "NF Kassell MD", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal\n\nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke -\nDonald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pirie\nintroduced us ...\n\nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month.\n\nI think you would both enjoy spending time together -\n\nThanks to you both for always supporting me.\n\nYou are both copied."}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks\n\nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish HEE was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the\n25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.\n\nBe well."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Neal Kassell"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes, will be in town , coordiante atime closer . look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Will do\n\nDoes Leslie do your schedule?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Neal Kassel"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 1:40:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029963.txt_17948
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029963.txt
subject: Bitcoin and DC
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Sinofsky", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/22/2013 3:48:56 PM", "subject": "Bitcoin and DC", "body": "http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/11/21/heres-how-bitcoin-charmed-washington\n\nI'm up 50% on my BTC investment!\n\nHere's how Bitcoin charmed Washington\n\nBY TIMOTHY B. LEE\n\naa areca\n\nThe Bitcoin Foundation's Patrick Murck testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee. (U.S.\nSenate)\n\nThe pair of Bitcoin hearings held this week by Senate committees could have been a disaster for the\nBitcoin community. After all, Bitcoin first came to mainstream attention in 2011 when\n\nGawker reported on Silk Road, an anonymous online marketplace that allowed users to purchase a wide\nvariety of illegal drugs with Bitcoin. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) denounced the site and suggested\n\nthat Bitcoin was \"an online form of money laundering.\" A few months ago, it would have been easy to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021400.txt_17951
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021400.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n212 446 4970.\n\nThank you,\nJay"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already\nhave by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 7:12:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012625.txt_17956
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012625.txt
subject: RE: Other attorneys
messages:
  [{"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:37 PM", "subject": "Other attorneys", "body": "Hi Jay — These four people were recommended. I have not contacted them to find out what their rates are. All are very active in the plaintiffs’ bar in the West Palm area. Ted Babbitt would be my first choice of these four but I think he is conflicted out because one of his partners is married to an AUSA here. Stuart Grossman is probably my second choice.\n\nTed Babbitt -- http://www.babbitt-johnson.com/tbabbitt.html\n\nStuart Grossman -- http://www.grossmanandroth.com/sgrossman.htm\nChris Searcy -- http://www.searcylaw.com/CHRISTIANSEARCY/tabid/935/default.aspx\n\nLake Lytal, Jr. -- http://www.lytalreiter.com/index.php?page_id=37"}, {"sender": "A. Marie Villafaña", "recipients": ["Jay"], "timestamp": "09/26/2007 11:01 AM", "subject": "RE: Other attorneys", "body": "Hi Jay — Can you give me a call at RE his morning? I am meeting with the agents and want to give them their marching orders regarding what they can tell the girls.\n\nAlso, please remove Babbitt and Searcy from the list. There is too great a chance of an appearance of impropriety with Babbitt and I received a bad report about Searcy last night.\n\nThank you."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029234.txt_17975
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029234.txt
subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Noam Chomsky <q@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. —\nare much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics\nfind dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign,\netc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while\nrecognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their\nbeliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we\nshould ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with\nargument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of\nsecular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard\n\nsometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs\ninforms us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in\ncontradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the\nevidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 4:08:16 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt_17978
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt_17984
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from\n\nok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here..\nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution\n\nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss <l.krauss@asu.edu>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:55:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "noiam in paris thanks"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt_17990
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying44"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:34:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your watch turned out to be a truly great investment:)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030096.txt_17992
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:39:00 -0500", "subject": "Re:", "body": "feel better?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On way to Delhi from Bangalore. Do you think Obama persuadable to introduce a (Tobin) fin transaction tax ?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/19/2009 8:06:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no but as bonuses get paid in jan , the fear is a renewal of the bonus tax."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028801.txt_17995
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028801.txt
subject: Alex Acosta resigns, Jeffrey Epstein arrested and Trump ends bid for citizenship question on census
messages:
  [{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/13/2019 6:48:31 PM", "subject": "Alex Acosta resigns, Jeffrey Epstein arrested and Trump ends bid for citizenship question on census", "body": "Plus, U.K. ambassador to U.S. resigns, Tom Steyer enters 2020 race and remembering Ross Perot.\n\nBiggest news stories from the past week.\n\nAlex Acosta resigns as labor secretary amid intense scrutiny of his handling of Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nwashingtonpost.com / David Nakamura, John Wagner, Ashley Parker, Josh Dawsey Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's resignation Friday amid the mushrooming Jeffrey Epstein investigation made him the latest in a growing list of President… read more\n\nFinancier in sex abuse case went from math whiz to titan\n\napnews.com / MICHAEL R. SISAK and JIM MUSTIAN, Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) — He has rubbed elbows with a prince and flown a former president on his private jet. He amassed a fortune that includes a 100-acre island… read more\n\nDarroch's resignation may have chilling effect on diplomacy, experts warn\n\ntheguardian.com / Sabrina Siddiqui in Washington The resignation of Sir Kim Darroch as the UK's ambassador to the US after controversy over leaked memos in which he criticized Donald Trump could have a… read more\n\nTrump backs away from census citizenship question, orders agencies to hand over citizenship information to Commerce\n\ncnn.com / Kevin Liptak, Pamela Brown, Jim Acosta and Kaitlan Collins, CNN Washington (CNN) — President Donald Trump retreated from his quest to add a question about US citizenship to the 2020 census on Thursday, instead… read more\n\nIran makes new nuclear threats that would reverse steps in pact\n\nreuters.com / Babak Dehghanpisheh, Tuqa Khalid GENEVA/DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran threatened on Monday to restart deactivated centrifuges and ramp up enrichment of uranium to 20% purity in a move away… read more\n\nPro-impeachment billionaire Tom Steyer makes late entry into Democratic race\n\nnbcnews.com / Alex Seitz-Wald The California hedge fund founder, who considered running earlier this year but pulled back, now joins a crowded field of more than 20 candidates.… read more\n\nTrump Proposes Ways to Improve Care for Kidney Disease and Increase Transplants\n\nnytimes.com / REED ABELSON and KATIE THOMAS President Trump issued a sweeping set of proposals aimed at improving medical care for the tens of millions of Americans who have kidney disease, a… read more\n\nBillionaire and former presidential candidate Ross Perot dies at 89\n\ncnbc.com / Kevin Breuninger Billionaire businessman, philanthropist and independent presidential candidate Ross Perot is dead at 89, CNBC has confirmed. Perot, who ran for … read more\n\nHouse Judiciary approves subpoenas for 12 key witnesses, including Jared Kushner\n\npolitico.com / ANDREW DESIDERIO and KYLE CHENEY The House Judiciary Committee voted on Thursday to authorize subpoenas for 12 crucial witnesses as part of House Democrats' ongoing investigations… read more\n\nWATCH: Women's National Soccer Team Parades Through NYC's 'Canyon Of Heroes'\n\nnpr.org / Bill Chappell The U.S. Women's National Team is celebrating their World Cup championship with a ticker tape parade in New York City. Throngs of fans packed… read more\n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028880.txt_17998
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028880.txt
subject: Fwd: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2014 3:39:53 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "I fear she should have pulled out last week."}, {"sender": "The Washington Post <newsletters@email.washingtonpost.com>", "recipients": ["Summers, Lawrence"], "timestamp": "October 8, 2014 at 10:05:38 PM EDT", "subject": "Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to\nCartagena scandal\n\nAs nearly two dozen Secret Service agents and members of the military were\npunished or fired following a 2012 prostitution scandal in Colombia, Obama\nadministration officials repeatedly denied that anyone from the White House was"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt_17999
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt
subject: Fwd: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg [owlmgw@att.net]", "Weingarten, Reid", "Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez [lilly@lslawfirm.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032439.txt_18000
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032439.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 09:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of buyers in the US have resurfaced"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I just got my G550 - 5176 under contract at $18.5 and it's going to Pre-Purchase inspection on Monday.\nI'm aware that G550 - 5109 was under contract for $17,600,000.\nAs a company we have 5 G550, 2 G650 and 1 BBJ buyers.\nThat is all I know for now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:21", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and 5 s?"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:27:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good V's are trading between $10-13.0M"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt_18003
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt
subject: My Prediction Coming True
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner (i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:59:21 PM", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": ""}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 20, 2017 at 8:08:09 AM PDT", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": "TRUMP IMPEACHMENT PETITION: CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION\n\nWATCH: In a Shocking Turn of Events, Flynn\nMoves To Take Down Pence.\n\nAn MSNBC panel says that former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn has information that could take down Vice\nPresident Mike Pence. Flynn may have leaked information that shows Pence and the Trump transition team knew\nthat foreign governments were paying him.\n\nIf this information turns out to be true, 1t would be a devastating blow to the Vice President’s reputation. So far, Pence is\nuntouched by the Russia scandal.\n\nThe prevailing opinion is that Pence didn’t know anything about Flynn’s calls to the Russian ambassador to the U.S. And\nthe administration’s story is that Flynn lied about his Russian contacts to Pence.\n\nRelated\n&\nALERT: House Democrats Made The PERFECT Trap For Pence, and He Fell Right Into It."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt_18007
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt
subject:
  | did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2018 5:29:23 PM", "subject": "| did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair", "body": "Importance: — High\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5316779/Haley-denies-disgusting-rumors-affair-Trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032261.txt_18015
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032261.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 20, 2016, at 8:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "rest"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <ruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This is a stupid and exhausting trip. No more speeches."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak.?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am about to go on stage. The first part of my presentation is about Trump."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 8:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "con man, says it all"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <ruemmli@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 4:47:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I talked about his role in the birther movement. In car on way to Denver airport now."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031768.txt_18019
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031768.txt
subject: Not Bad for a HORSE Head Though
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem PF", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/17/2018 5:26:21 AM", "subject": "Not Bad for a HORSE Head Though", "body": "Trump calls Stormy Daniels 'Horseface'\n\nJordan Fabian\n1 hr ago\n\n© Photo by Gabe Ginsberg/Getty Images Stormy Daniels hit back with an insult of her own after President\nTrump called her \"Horseface.\" President Trump on Tuesday called adult-film star Stormy Daniels \"Horseface\"\nand threatened to \"go after\" her after he won a court victory over his alleged mistress."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032363.txt_18031
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032363.txt
subject: Re: My sister's perspective from Europe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:34:38 PM", "subject": "Re: My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "Putin? NATO? Those were the points my sister raised that were concerning. \nWill meet you in Boston or NYC sometime. Curious to hear your thinking."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 13, 2016, at 1:28 PM", "subject": "Re: My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "he is neither sexist or racistl that is the point and in fact the truth. he says things . to get elected and it \nworked nothing more. talking heads goofyy"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "I am looking at this from over here in Germany. American politics gets reduced in the end to only a few issues: \npro-life or pro-choice, gun laws, and establishment vs. anti-establishment. Political categories are so wishy \nwashy and intermingled with what is termed 'liberal' and 'conservative' that one forgets what they actually \nmean. \nOf course, not everybody who voted for Trump is sexist or a racist, but, on some level, they didn't care if he is. \nHe knew how to gather momentum with the discourse he chose, and, even if he changes his tone, he has let \nloose a storm. We will brace ourselves over here for Putin's eventual takeover of the Baltic States. Putin has \nextended his power back into Republic of Georgia, the Crimea, and Armenia. Trump has said that he would \nnot come to the aid of Nato allies if they were attacked. IS is the least of our problems here in Germany; \nErdogan is a much larger threat, for now. \nI don't see Hillary Clinton as being at fault. I see the growth of nationalism (all throughout the world, not just \nin the USA) and an underestimation of the fear that non-Hispanic whites have about the trajectory they are on \nto become a minority (in the USA and other European countries). \nEvery news show, talk show, etc here is discussing and analysing the fallout of Trump's win. German \npoliticians are hoping to learn from it, to stem the growth of the right wing AFD party here. As far as I know, \nMerkel is the only leader who congratulated Trump with a warning."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt_18036
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt
subject: RE: Daily Beast
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 03:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Daily Beast", "body": "You are mentioned !\n\nJeffrey Epstein's Society Friends Close Ranks\n\nby Alexandra Wolfe\n\nAlexandra Wolfe is a former contributing editor to Conde Nast Portfolio. She has written for publications\nincluding the New York Times, New York magazine, the New York Observer, and the Wall Street Journal,\nwhere she wrote design and lifestyle features for the Weekend Journal section. Before that, she was a reporter\nat the New York Observer. She is currently working on a book called American Coddle, about America's\nculture of entitlement.\n\nX Close\n\ne -+\nNo, back then Epstein was mid-makeover. He had monarchy in-house and famous faces at his table. Former\nBear Stearns CEO James Cayne had just endorsed Epstein on his science foundation's website (which has been\nsince removed). It seemed Epstein had joined the ranks of former President Clinton, director Roman Polanski,\nand former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, whose sex scandals faded in comparison with their celebrity.\nThe conventional wisdom among his friends was that Epstein has been victimized by greedy, morally dubious\nteenage girls and unscrupulous lawyers. \"I've never condoned paying for sex, but if the young lady lied about\nher age it's her own fault,\" explained one socialite, who along with hedge-fund manager Wilbur Ross and real-\nestate magnate Leon Black hobnobbed with Epstein ata Southampton movie screening just two months after\nhis release from \"community control\" in Florida.\n\nMuch of Epstein's entrée into New York society can be credited to Ghislaine Maxwell, the superbly well-\nconnected daughter of the late press magnate Robert Maxwell. Epstein started dating her in the 1990s. The\nromantic relationship ended after a few years, but they have remained close ever since. Last week two victims\npublicly alleged that Ghislaine procured them for Epstein, one at age 15 from a Mar-a-Lago country club locker\nroom. Virginia Roberts, now 27, who was Epstein's sexual plaything for several years, told the Mail on\n\nSunday. \"Ghislaine sent me to a dentist to have my teeth whitened and I went for Brazilian waxes. He wanted\nme to look pre-pubescent.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032275.txt_18043
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032275.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016 at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016 at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 11:32:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yikes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032405.txt_18044
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032405.txt
subject: Re: From a physicist friend
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "FYI\nResponding to another physicist who said \"None of you seem capable of rational objective critical thinking on this topic of consciousness as a physical phenomenon.\"\n\nResponse\n\"That's because it isn't, and everyone here (apparently save one) is rational and objective enough to understand that. Physical phenomena, and phenomena in general, are ultimately perceptual in nature and subject to observational replication - that's why they call physics an empirical science. But consciousness is not.\n\nConsciousness cannot be objectively, replicably observed. Its putative physical correlates, including brains and behaviors, can be replicably observed, and it can be subjectively apprehended by any conscious entity. But that's it. Anyone who denies this understands neither physics nor consciousness, and has a severe logic problem to boot, inasmuch as he/she cannot properly distinguish between cognition and perception or internal and external state.\n\nThis isn't \"polemics\". This is just the way it is. Stop overreaching.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Jan 2, 2017 at 8:27 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "Breathe"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 2, 2017 11:53 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "Awareness is you\nChair and Body / Mind and The Universe are re created in consciousness with every experience in you / being\nExperience is in time\nYou are not in time\nThis mornings post\nHas so far reached 300,000 people in less than 1 hour\nSome people are getting it !!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Jan 2, 2017 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "im glad. I think the encyclpedia of meditation is going to be great we still have to work on the app and the boardgame. . instead of jail maybe it is spending time with Trump."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, January 2, 2017 10:58:07 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "I'm with you Sir!\nHoping to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/2/2017 4:39:38 PM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "Today's Chronicle\nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/Why-You-and-the-Universe-Are-One-10830679.php"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt_18047
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes , one of the most complex negotiations they re very strange. Someone buys fighters but with\nthe fighter money , some must be used for specific third party items. | will buy your pussy for 10k,\nbut with 2 of the 10 you have to buy me food. And to make matter worse | need to borrow thev10\nfrom you."}, {"sender": "nn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hmm, so the offset service provider does what - negotiation between the parties? Complex sounds interesting..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brazil , has tried to buy fighters, inthe past, they don't have a lot of money,"}, {"sender": "Cl", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Apparently Brazil is a hot investment place now (7?) It is more about the offset part than the jet deal. France, Sweden and\nUSA are all lobbying to get the jet deal as aviation is tied into potentially big tourism deals. (36 planes)\n\n| was just on a call with a guy in Sweden who is dealing with this...\n\n| never know if the stories are real, but he claims to work with the Brazilian president, Obama, Warren Buffet etc.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt_18049
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt
subject:
  Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/23/2016 3:03:49 PM", "subject": "Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt_18052
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Martin"], "timestamp": "August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nJust wanted to check if you've seen the previous email.\n\nIf it's more convenient for you to discuss it by Skype, let me know. If you want to skip any of them it's not a problem."}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Martin"], "timestamp": "Aug 2, 2017, at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nThanks for the great call last week. Enjoyed it a lot. Could I ask you some follow up questions?\n\nQuestion to be answered by Martin.\n\n° What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?\n\n° Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?\n\ne The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?\n\n° Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?\n\n° What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?\n\ne What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)\n\ne How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?\n\nQuestion\n\n° Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It’s a hot topic given this story"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great, will do"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt_18065
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/10/2017 2:29:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/real-estate/2017/05/08/trump-looking-to-unload-caribbean-beach-estate.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023225.txt_18066
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023225.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM", "subject": null, "body": "saved you 500k at the last minute, . brad has had the same chart since march 16th, its his job to review"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt_18069
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "son. 24. jun. 2018 kl. 15:18", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think you might suggest to putin, that lavrov , can get insight on talking to me. vitaly churkin used to . but he died. ? !"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland <", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll meet Lavrovs assistant on Monday and will suggest \nThank you fo a lovely evening. I'll com to un high level week"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "6/24/2018 1:59:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "churkin was great. he understood trump after our conversations, it is not complex. he must be seen to get \nsomething its that simple."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt_18070
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "my assistant\nlondon. fun\nalso going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he's got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to in russia id appreciate it. . dont\nknow parties. ride to london . shes a futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:03:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029276.txt_18072
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029276.txt
subject: Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 9:43:10 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "i will forward it. he asked if you would come back again, without the russian. to me it was a woody allen movie. you talking conciousness , his wife more concerned with the salad dressing, and the russian deciding the future of syria. . As you know I find ideas no matter how extreme , the root of possible insight, so the other day I had viisitn the psychedelic crowd. one of them has opened a store on 1 st and the bowery called the alchemist kitchen. . How about we meet there, I want to see the store and you ride with me back uptown. lets say 230? I have left my schedule open after."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:57 AM", "subject": "Re: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind I thought I'd share this\nSee you at 3PM\nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.php"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032388.txt_18073
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032388.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:01:04 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion \nhow much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best \njonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt_18077
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt
subject:
  Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:52:00 -0400", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/20/politics/china-cold-war-us-superpower-influence/index.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2018 11:40:00 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "So epic---world coming our way"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt_18078
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http s ://www.the dailyb east. com/how-clo se-is-donal d-trump-to-a-p sychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Careful, or the pendulum is going to swing hard the other way and feminists will be in charge of everything"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:16:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i was kidding"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025163.txt_18082
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025163.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:47:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\n\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\n\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Torn"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "imin wed, fri. edelman?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt_18085
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt
subject: Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/19/2017 2:09:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHuge thanks for giving BBB another chance!!We have 200 quite fantastic young women\nincluding a minister, an ambassador-Lisa! a professor -your Anna!-a princess-Sofia! and\nthe other 196\n\nare doing pretty good as well...lots of young girls in Sweden now dream of joining\nBBB...we really build something\n\nunique and worthwhile!! Young dean at Stockholm School of Economics is an idiot to\nthrough it all out but\n\nnow its time to develop it smartly! | will be doing a famous Summer radio program in a few\nweeks in Sweden,\n\n1 million listeners...among other things, | will talk about the girls..(and my blind date long\nago with a Donald\n\nTrump..ha ha!) Anyway, please see details for the money transaction below - Edyta is my\nbanker ann a super\n\nperson! - | am leaving tomorrow night if anything? Also, if you send me a cell phone\nnumber, | can start sending\n\nyou photos from BBB, much easier than e-mail.\n\nTACK sweetheart for continuing believing in BBB! Kram BE\n\nBarbro C. Ehnbom\n\nChairman, Swedish-American Life Science Summit"}, {"sender": "Edyta.Wynberg", "recipients": ["behnbom"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 19, 2017 9:05 am", "subject": "SV: BBB AB konto #?", "body": "Hej Barbro!\nBeneficiary name: BBB AB\n\nBeneficiarys bank: SEB ( Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken)\n106 40 Stockholm"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029504.txt_18096
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029504.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 10 2019 08.07 AM", "subject": "", "body": "Dear Jeff, \nI read the news papers today, I can't believe they arrested you again, you are the only man on the planet who \nwould never be bad with any women as you love them too much. \nIt is so untrue what they are saying. If you need my support I am there. \nI was 19 when I meet you with our wonderful commun friend HRH Prince Andrew and you would have never \ndone anything wrong to me. \nI meet the few lovely girls around you, they loved you and you were so good with them. They were bringing \nyou ideas, creativity, a touch of youth in this very difficult world and happiness like a young can do. \nNothing more! Then of course I am sure they were happy to hope to become your girlfriend as women are \nalways attracted by men of power! \nI traveled with you to discuss my future in business, you introduced me amongst the most important scientists \nand neuroscientists in the world at Harvard University and you kindly advise me to continue to study. You also \nexplained to me that life is hard and business is difficult.You were feeling I should study more. All your advises \nwere so right. Thank you. \nI feel sorry that these girls are only interested by your money. I feel sorry for that and they might be \nmanipulated by people of power who wish to do bad to the Trump gouvernement. \nDo you remember that you asked me to be your girlfriend, I was back in France after our trip together in \nHarvard, you tried to convince me on the phone, I refused and look today we stayed friends for ever. You never \ndid anything wrong as these girls are mentioning, it was up to them to be involved with you sexually, it was \ntheir own decision, not your wish. \nI don't know if you will read this message. I hope so. \nPlease receive my warmest wishes and love."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029585.txt_18098
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029585.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolf"], "timestamp": "1/15/2019 11:36:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "a Forwarded message ---------"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "it would go something like this. .............. 1 Donald doesn't really own very much, he rents out his name. he puts it on buildings projects etc. for a royalty or piece of the upside. he then claims the assetis\" his\". its very much like hyatt hotels. it says Hyatt hotel on the front but it is owned by someone else. ( sometimes by Hyatt but not often). Hyatt receives 3 percent per year of revenue and a piece of the profits sometimes if the hotel is sold at a profit. .\n\nmoney launderers. need a name to purchase trophy properties. why? there is little suspicion if a\n\nfamous wealthy person buys a property that is likely to show in the press. , it cant be jojo my driver. up\nfront , so they approach wealthy people and tell them for 2 -5 million dollars for doing nothing at all. - just\nlend us your name .- and the person get the positive press. so and so bought the most expensive\n\npainting. sold the most expensive painting, house., diamond. etc. -ex the GANZ art collection was bought\nand sold by Joe Lewis.. all the publicity was the ganz family estate. selling etc.\n\nhypothetically, . someone approached trump and said can you buy the palm beach house. in your\nname. (it was trump properties llc) , not sure who actually owns the llc. ? Donald can get a loan from a\nbank , but it is guaranteed by , an entity controlled byR R_ hasabvico. xitrans. that is owned by a family\ntrust. (cyprus ). R wife settles in oct after trump anounces candidacy. the Ilc agreement or the loan\nagreement allows Donald to get a few million for his name.. R in essence is the\" owner. \". he was part of\nthe panama papers release. he also sold the da vinci to mbs..? if you area gangster , where and how can\nyou invest money. answer not through the front door.\n\nDonald's financial disclosures are the same , he represents his\" income\" as the GROSS receipts of his\nclubs.\" , means nothing at all ZERO. no income as we no it.\n\nhe lists his \"assets\" ,and their VALUE - but not the corresponding loans. against it. so no net number\n, hence meaningless."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt_18100
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt
subject: Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump | Know | | Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2016 8:12:44 PM", "subject": "Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump | Know | | Observer", "body": "Importance: High\n\nhttp://observer.com/2016/07/jared-kushner-the-donald-trump-i-know/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031973.txt_18102
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031973.txt
subject: rather long and a few typos
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["George Krassner i ick kazon i Vrisnan02", "Rebecca Risman", "Linda W. Grossman"], "timestamp": "5/15/2019 12:17:32 AM", "subject": "rather long and a few typos", "body": "REMEMBERING CAVALIER MAGAZINE\nLAUNCHING A MAGAZINE\n\nMy friend Michael Simmons, who has been the editor of National Lampoon and High\nTimes, observes that Cavalier hired fine scribes. A few examples: Thomas Pynchon, Philip Roth,\nWilliam Saroyman, Isaac Asimov, Theodore Sturgeon. Cavalier was launched by Fawcett\n\nPublications in 1952.\n\nMen’s magazine Cavalier (motto: “For the American Male”) was published the year\nbefore Playboy to whom it has often been compared, and back in the day tried to be seen as\nslightly hipper, more youthful and considered a bit more clever than its big name rival. Almost\nan anti-establishment Playboy. A slogan stated: “Your dad bought Playboy, you\n\nbought Cavalier.”\nI BECAME A COLUMNIST\n\nI was invited to write a column, named “The Naked Emperor,” for Cavalier, that was beginning\nto publish underground writers and artists. They paid me $1,000 a month. My first column was a\nreport on an auction of two-inch squares from the hotel bedsheets slept on by the Beatles during\n\ntheir first trip to America.\n\nThere were 300 screaming young girls, off on a fetishist’s holiday. Obviously, there wouldn’t be\nenough items to go around, but it was announced that the Beatles’ unwashed towels and bed\nlinens were to be cut into two-inch squares and sold for $1 each. The price included a notarized\n\nstatement of authenticity."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661.txt_18104
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661.txt
subject: Re: off the record
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. | the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose?\n\nBut you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV....\nCall me any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:57:01 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "can talk now."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022479.txt_18107
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022479.txt
subject: Kim-Trump border meeting: history or photo-op?
messages:
  [{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/30/2019 6:28:36 PM", "subject": "Kim-Trump border meeting: history or photo-op?", "body": "Plus, why dogs look so sad and the 100 coolest people in food and drink.\n\nInteresting stories worth your time.\n\nWhat Does Putin Really Want?\n\nKim-Trump border meeting: History or just a photo-op?\n\nThese monkeys are 3,000 years into their own 'Stone Age'\n\nLow-Wage Workers Are Being Sued for Unpaid Medical Bills by a Nonprofit Christian Hospital That Employs Them\n\nWhy Do Dogs Look So Sad?\n\nCain and Abel and Oil\n\nWhen Myspace Was King, Employees Abused a Tool Called 'Overlord' to Spy on Users\n\nWoodstock 'Took on a Life of its Own,' Recent Archaeological Survey Reveals\n\nAlanis Morissette on Pregnancy at 45, Childbirth, Postpartum Depression, and #MeToo\n\nThe 100 coolest people in food and drink\n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026324.txt_18111
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026324.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack LANG EP", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jerffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 20 sept. 2018 a 12:01", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was offline for yom kippur . can you put me in direct contact .? happy holiday"}, {"sender": "Jack ANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/24/2018 2:43:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffery,\n\nThe best solution is to put you in contact with Philippe Castro who works on the film with Serge Moati and who\n\nspeaks english.\n\nSerge Moati doesn’t speak english.\n\nHere are the contacts from Philipp: i <i s\nWithe my friendship,\n\nJack"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026442.txt_18114
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026442.txt
subject: Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump’s decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you’re one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with\nsenior White House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course\nsee if you want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the\nrecord, just in case there is any nuance or guidance you’d like to provide. I’m at |, or my desk\nis\n\nThanks,\nAshley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "do you want it? or jared?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:28 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Do | have the choice? And if so, your view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 9:52:23 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "we should talk"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023219.txt_18121
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023219.txt
subject: Re: Fw: sched
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: sched", "body": "course should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past\nagreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when IJ initially proposed a multi year agreement\nright out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in\nexcess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my\nlimited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in\nthe amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only\none, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my\nwhiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I\nam of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a\ngreat deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine .\n\nWe are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:36 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "Jeffrey-joe tells me yau want this to go live on 12/21. Possible, but an awful lot has to\ngo right next week logistically for everything to fall into place. We'll try...."}, {"sender": "Brad Wechsler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:36 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "On different subject: general time frame is: docs (notes and purchase and sale\nagreement to you tomorrow end of biz); incorporate your comments monday and get\ndocs to trust attorney tuesday; contemporaneously meet in person with you tuesday or\nwednesday and do a dry run. On these days ada will also take the trustees through\noutline of docs they will receive thursday. Docs to trustees, leon et al on thursday and\nsignatures gathered by friday for first close 12/22. Tight but doable. Ada, alan agree?\nPS: ada, you shld begin to think abt where people are (jh, rr, bc, Idb) next week."}, {"sender": "Heather Gray", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Fw:", "body": "Subject: Re: Fw: sched\nBarry-what we're going to do with jeffrey will be \"small picture\" and detailed. It might be better for you"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023001.txt_18124
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023001.txt
subject: Privileged and Confidential - Timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case I Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/10/2019 11:06:29 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt_18127
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt
subject: Your buddies!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Po Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 9:20:41 PM", "subject": "Your buddies!", "body": "Some news - Dershowitz has been at the White House for part of today as Trump seeks his input, and he’s supposed to have dinner with the president tonight, per WH sources"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026456.txt_18136
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026456.txt
subject: Re: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Mclanic Spinclla"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ 2? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt_18138
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Gmax gmax1@ellmax.com"], "timestamp": "11/10/2010 8:53:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Imagine exactly the opposite ? Appetizers 20, salad pasta dishes meat dishes fist dishes cheeses chocolates teas nuts olives hummus breads cakes pastry sorbet ice-cream juices fruits \n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2010, at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I now refer to my most recent trip as that mad adventure. The  Arabian Stallion I rode across the desert had 2 speeds. Fast and faster. Oh, did I mention his name was Obama?  My hands are still clamped shut from trying to hold him! I didn't see a lick of water or a loo for a week and sand, even after 12 showers, is still coming out of places I did not know existed! The food...well what can one say about a piece of flat bread and some warm goats milk? The sleeping arrangements were deeply dodgy - shared a three sided  Bedouin tent with a host of strangers, with not so much as a lamp for light,  whilst  freezing to death in the night air and simultaneously choking whilst inhaling swirls of sand from the nightly storms. The nadir was being propositioned by a toothless Arab who lit the fire and helped feed the horses to a tumble around the bushes during a bedouin night story telling moment..Does that give you a picture?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt_18145
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt
subject: LinkedIn’s Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump’s Tax Returns
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 5:36:29 PM", "subject": "LinkedIn’s Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump’s Tax Returns", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-12/linkedin-s-hoffman-offers-5-million-for-trump-s-tax-returns"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025639.txt_18151
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025639.txt
subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island\nin bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is\nremarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist.. his show\nwith alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "or we can visit him on his"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 7:02:55 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "will bring up that possibility. :)\n\nso glad we are aging to see you down there.. working hard now after a week of traveling with Johnny and late\nnights, to finish my new book so I can actually celebrate that as planned on the trip."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022932.txt_18158
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022932.txt
subject: FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Marty: With the understanding"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt_18164
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt
subject: JE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 10:14:16 PM", "subject": "JE", "body": "From: NYSD_ ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov [mailto:NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov]\nSent: Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM\n\nTo: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov\n\nSubject: Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal\n\nThis is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to\nthis e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n*** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits\nattorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of\nall documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees\napply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first\nviewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not\napply.\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\n\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of\nCivil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-\ncaptioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document\nfiled by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329"}, {"sender": "NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to\nthis e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n*** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits\nattorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of\nall documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees\napply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first\nviewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not\napply.\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\n\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of\nCivil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-\ncaptioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document\nfiled by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt_18173
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt
subject: J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "2/27/2012 5:50:08 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits", "body": "Eye on the Market, February 27, 2012 {the attached PDF is much easier to read this week, particularly if you are interested in the energy science implications of last week’s press release from the House Minority Leader]\nTopics: oil markets and Iran\n\nMost of this week’s note deals with oil prices and Iran, but I did want to point out a trend that is illustrative of how things are going globally. One of the strongest aspects of the US recovery has been the rebound in business spending on equipment and software. As highlighted by our friends at Hamiltonian Associates, sales by Caterpillar’s dealer network are a proxy for global trends. Caterpillar’s US sales are leading the pack for the first time in a while, Asia is moderating, and Europe trails with a distinctly negative trend. We expect a recovery in US payrolls this year, and eventually, in labor incomes. The US recovery may be weak by historical standards, but expectations are pretty low (2.2% growth in 2012). We expect the US to exceed expectations, and for Europe ex-Germany to disappoint them. Absent a blow-up in\n\n“Tranium enrichment”: another hurdle for global markets to surmount\n\nThe near-term fundamentals don’t point to higher oil prices. Oil demand has been revised down a bit, particularly in the OECD, and non-OPEC supply growth is a little higher in 2012 than in recent years. After netting all the supply and demand factors, it looks like there will be a global oil inventory build in 2012 (see chart below), not something we would normally associate with rising oil prices. However, even before we get to Iran, there are other factors contributing to higher prices: a pick-up in global growth expectations for 2013 and beyond; the explosion of Central Bank balance sheets and associated reflation goals (see last week’s EoTM); and the possibility that China’s will build strategic crude oil reserves to the IEA standard of 90 days from their current level of 14. Note as well that the inventory build is a small one, nowhere near 2002-2007 levels."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031152.txt_18178
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031152.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you friends are all connected."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Laughing very hard...are you there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "call me 133144170210"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Weird day...some poor soul jumped in front of my speeding Acela to commit suicide...quite a mess...just back in d.c....where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 04:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "same paris number 331 441 70210"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Been preoccupied with ukraine...creeps...trip next week in doubt...will report tomorrow...too annoyed to talk tonite..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "time to relax. go get a massage"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [ay", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/10/2011 2:46:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "| wish"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030684.txt_18181
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030684.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 4:57:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's sake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--whacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur Sulzberger."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt_18190
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt
subject: Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Rucmm"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:16:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt_18192
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 6:56:49 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post. \nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific \ncommunity. \nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind? \nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, \nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference \ncall on Skype. \nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip. \nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you. \nbest wishes, \nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-\nproposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d  \nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After \nTrump's Proposed \"Anti-Science\" Budget \nCuts \nwww.huffingtonpost.com \nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, \nonce said, \"The good thing about science is that it's true, \nwhether or not you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \ncan you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you? \nPerhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it. \nbest wishes, \nStanley"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt_18194
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt
subject: Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?
messages:
  [{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/6/2019 8:06:22 AM", "subject": "Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?", "body": "Answer: When gangs take new soldiers or gang members join a gang they are subjected to the ritual “Jumping In”. Jumping in members is like the final last part of a job interview...\n\nJeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\n[Content of various Quora stories and links follow, which are part of the digest notification]"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt_18200
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nlam meeting him as he has some questions. | do not need anything from him."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun,"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\n| heard that he is not that fun but itrust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. | was just flirting with 22 years old\nhot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we\nconcluded, anything good is rented ;)"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Just had mtg with Andrew. He is great.\nJee - i think that iwould trade davos for a good fashion week. Much more fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 02:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "iunderstand,, the ratio of run to leap is way too high"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025942.txt_18202
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025942.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2016 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "now where?"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got back a few days ago. Right now at the Cape for a few days. After that Valeria is off to Brazil and I'll be in Cambridge until she comes back."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what was the highlight.? caribean is close to brazil, if you wanted you are always welcome and valeria can meet you there."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 8:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Highlight? A chance to spend some free time alone together. Some good concerts. An evening in a small café with jazz duo playing Brazilian jazz. Things like that.\n\nStill eager to make it to the Caribbean, but looks as though we'll have to wait."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 26, 2016 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "brexit. trump. syria, ukraine. all tribal"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 12:23:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: Re:", "body": "All too true, I’m afraid."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt_18207
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, DD", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 1:58:4.", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish | was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "where?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt_18213
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2017 6:36:24 PM", "subject": null, "body": "OMG!!! Columbia university is so political involved and has such a strong feminists influence !!! \nToday we judged Clinton about scandal with Monica Lewinsky, judged Hillary that she hasn't left him, \nand judged Vladimir Putin ...we actually mention him every day. .@"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032467.txt_18219
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032467.txt
subject: Re: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\n\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Friday, February 10, 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:49:48 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032217.txt_18221
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032217.txt
subject: Iran and Trump Speech.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["JEFF EPSTEIN [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 6:58:42 AM", "subject": "Iran and Trump Speech.", "body": "Mr. Rouhani's supporters also expect his victory, with 57 percent of the vote, to bolster his \noutreach efforts to the West and the pursuit of more foreign investment to lift Iran's ailing \neconomy. \nFor those who voted for Mr. Rouhani, there was a feeling of tremendous relief that his challenger, \nthe hard-line cleric Ebrahim Raisi, who criticized the nuclear deal with the United States and \nother Western powers, had lost. \n\"Bye-bye, Raisi,\" the crowds chanted during the street gatherings. \n\"He faces a difficult task,\" Fazel Meybodi, a Shiite Muslim cleric from the city of Qum, said of Mr. \nRouhani. \"Now he must provide more freedoms, break the hard-line monopoly on the state-run \nradio and television, and increase freedom of press.\" \nTo achieve all that, Mr. Rouhani must persuade the hard-line-dominated judiciary and security \nforces to change their outlook, Mr. Meybodi said. \"If he fails to deliver on at least 70 percent of \nthose promises, his future is dark,\" he added. \nFor decades, Saudi Arabia and Iran have competed for religious leadership and political influence \nacross the Muslim world and beyond. \nTrump is correct, however, Rouhani needs a chance to act."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt_18225
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt
subject: Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "Tam writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\n\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach’ of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - Po - or this email address."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson <j>", "recipients": ["jJeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No !!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:26:02 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032301.txt_18233
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032301.txt
subject: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 1:56:19 AM", "subject": "This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-30/this-chart-predicts-trump-will-win-unless-the-s-p-rallies-in-october"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026287.txt_18236
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026287.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:23:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a piece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his friends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene.\n\njeevacation@gmail.com\n\nwe're on the same team. —strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced \" andys office\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions .. - michael cohen. michael flynn. . are not fictions created by mueller? how are you ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but | get your point. Couple of things:\n\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if | find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, | view it as an open invitation for cross examination and any other exploitation possible as it cannot be an accepted part of the process.\n\n2. In this whole matter, | am most disturbed by the composition of the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to learn anything from the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted above-board without personal and political baggage. Mueller had a whole universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to make up his team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. | can go one by one; but | will soare you. Here are a couple of examples:\n\nA. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as \"The Pathological Liar\" after the SNL character. He literally would withhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel went to the bathroom or lunch, stick the documents under others on his table and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. | have been brought into a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have come to me to admit their role in it - to get murder convictions in two cases. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined both Arthur Anderson and Enron through his work, all of which was rejected by the higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton sycophant. Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose Weissmann for his chief counsel at the FBI years ago."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028791.txt_18238
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028791.txt
subject: FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 5:45:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030135.txt_18241
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030135.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 140 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the N\nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General  \nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 9:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Oh, sorry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable \nalternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think I am pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham \nreimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "ok 1?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Will be there at 1."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2014 5:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "my chef is in from paris, stay hungry"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/21/2014 1:02:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I will. I drank too much wine last night and am dragging a bit this morning."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt_18252
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt
subject: Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/18/2016 8:20:31 PM", "subject": "Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube", "body": "Hysterical."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023351.txt_18254
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023351.txt
subject: Picasso agreement - question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Melanie Spinella", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com)"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:27 PM", "subject": "Picasso agreement - question", "body": "Brad and Jeffrey,\n\nGagosian has one final change to the Picasso agreement. As you know, we have structured this agreement with the Buyer as either Narrows Holdings LLC or AP Narrows LP, and given both of those entities the right to assign the agreement to any one among Leon, Debra, the kids, or family trusts including APO1 and APO2.\n\nGagosian wants us to agree that, if Narrows/AP Narrows assigns the agreement to someone else, Narrows/AP Narrows “shall not be discharged from its liabilities under this Agreement and shall remain primarily liable to Seller.” Larry is concerned that we might assign to the Black kids or to a trust that has no assets, and then when he has to sue us because we don’t make the final payment of the purchase price but have possession of the art, the entity/person to which we have assigned the agreement has no money.\n\nI think this is a valid concern and that we should agree to it.\n\nHowever, Ada just reminded me that it is possible that Narrows/AP Narrows (really, Leon’s) agreeing to effectively guarantee payment by the assignee might be considered a gift to the assignee. In the discussions with Alan about rearranging the bank loan once AP Narrows is operational, Alan agreed that there could be deemed to be a potential gift from Leon to APO1/APO2 if Leon provides a guarantee to the bank that is for the benefit of the trusts as partners in AP Narrows. Alan suggested mitigating this risk by having the trusts sign side agreements with Leon which say that if AP Narrows defaults on the loan and the bank goes after Leon on his guarantee, the trusts will make him whole.\n\nThis issue only arises if we assign the agreement. The risk is also limited in time because it would run from the moment we assigned the agreement until the final payment is made, which even if we assigned immediately after signing, would only be 11 1/2 months.\n\nShall I agree to Gagosian’s request that Narrows/AP Narrows remain liable even if they assign the agreement?\n\nI’m in the office if you would like to discuss this, but I would love to get back to Gagosian ASAP so we can have this agreement signed today.\n\nThanks,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Picasso agreement - question", "body": "silly"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Picasso agreement - question", "body": "your personal bottom line has increased dramatically, if you had thought of me as your partner in this endeavor , instead of an employee, i think your reaction to sharing t benefits would be different.\n\nIf you recall, you wanted me to be paid , unlike others at the END of my work. we discussed this ad nauseum, and agreed OCT 15, last year was the end. You had wanted more comfort initially on the art partnership so that date was delayed. It has now been six monhts since then, your concept of aftercare. . for free. was already unique , in your words this has to have an end.( weaned ) if the actions of josh and\n\nmark led to one hundred million dollars , what would be their share. Im not sure why it is different in your mind. but i respect the fact that it is, Is it because their work seems harder. it cannot be simply because they devote more time to you .or it appears to involve more effort. Iam happy to continue to play a partnership role. as I have been in many areas of your life.. I am also happy to move on and have no more of these emails. I find them as tedious as you do . if you prefer a partnership structure , ok with me, I tried to minimize the amount of money i would recieve by making it a flat fee . as i wanted you to feel good and have no second thoguths somehow if the payment comes from a partnership structure you seem relaxed as opposed to writing acheck, I focus on trust and friendship first, and the fact that you don't include josh and mark in that category, gives me great pause . I proposed 33 percent of money made for you. . in the past you agreed that amount. it will be huge, but ok with me, Ican talk today at 945 as you suggested. or if you woud1 rather over the weekend ok"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032634.txt_18257
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032634.txt
subject: STT
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/30/2017 5:43:18 PM", "subject": "STT", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI hear Pres Trump arrives in St Thomas on Tuesday FYI\nThx\n\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt_18266
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/22/2018 11:25:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Translation to follow"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 4:32:45 PM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It was that article in La Repubblica which you asked to be translated"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "II giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 22:21", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where is this this afternoon."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "II giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "What does this say???"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031559.txt_18270
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031559.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "May 19, 2018, at 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my good friend michael wolffe of FIre and Fury fame, .wanted to speak to you totally off the record. thoghts? he wanted some color on indicting a sitting pres, between us , he has seen a draft of one. . ) what does not subject to crimnal process mean. ? I assume trump corp has non of the consiutuional baggage?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 5:07:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Happy to do so. Feel free to give Michael my email address.\nHugs, Ken"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030647.txt_18272
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030647.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:11:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747  \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023345.txt_18278
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023345.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Bo"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and you and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. _, planes. boats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800 page tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers, home mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead of less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights . I wrote itto you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised as one of your concerns , asa rule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I fear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those things that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you wouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer many of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art partnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning that you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .( my work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of course should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past agreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement right out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in excess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my limited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in the amount still outstanding from last year if that helps ..\nHowever, As my best student , and my only one, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my whiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. Iam of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a great deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine.\n\nWe are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt_18288
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt
subject: contacts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/30/2016 4:40:14 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky,\nnathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain , demsaio, christakis, dennet, sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman,\nseligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp ,\n\nleahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, .\n\nblaine, boris, larry summers.\n\njagland, andrew, woody\n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz. _raafat, sultan\n\nhamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro,\n\nsmell menatlal fit, , lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein , diet excersicse\n\nAK chad pinto Isj, bbj, ana brice, \\\nloen terjge\nbradk"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026278.txt_18291
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026278.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Grossman, Andrew M"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}, {"sender": "Andrew Grossman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "will learn more once the inspector general finishes his investigation into Crossfire’s genesis. But given\n\nwhat is now known, due process demands, at a minimum, that the special counsel’s activity be paused.\n\nThose affected by Mr. Mueller’s investigation could litigate such an argument in court. One would\n\nhope, however, that given the facts either Mr. Mueller himself or Deputy Attorney General Rod\n\nRosenstein would do it first.\n\nMr. Rivkin and Ms. Foley practice appellate and constitutional law in Washington. He served at the\n\nJustice Department and the White House Counsel’s Office during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush\n\nadministrations. She is a professor at Florida International University College of Law.\n\nAppeared in the June 23, 2018, print edition.\n\nBest,\nAndrew"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028937.txt_18293
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028937.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031807.txt_18301
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031807.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will\nsend you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of\nfocus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from\nmanagement as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts.\nHowever I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": "-", "body": "Im not angry, sorry, itissad. itis apparent that you have no experience trading. we both madeamistake. . the\nspy trades were the results of arank amatuer... youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you\ndecided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time\npremium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it hit the\ntraget , you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you\npanicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033270.txt_18303
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033270.txt
subject: EUR
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2018 7:43:30 PM", "subject": "EUR", "body": "Any thoughts on the EUR up here? | just bought some 3 month puts as | think Trump will push the strong USD policy tomorrow."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt_18306
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt
subject: trump interview with anderson cooper
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2015 7:39:58 PM", "subject": "trump interview with anderson cooper", "body": "he is a character...\n\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/22/trump_to_anderson_cooper_during_interview_the_people_dont_trust_you_and_the_media.htm"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030109.txt_18312
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030109.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 140 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Wow\nhttp://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nominati on of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 9:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "He got 60. Rs controlled the Senate then."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Boy are you focused , I meant what number to call you on"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 10:41:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think I am pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031217.txt_18313
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031217.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie", "Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029458.txt_18314
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029458.txt
subject: Fwd: Other ways to trade Saudi
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda <amanda.ens@baml.com>", "recipients": ["rkahn"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2018 at 12:48:07 PM EDT", "subject": "Other ways to trade Saudi", "body": "Saudi trade continues to gain momentum as we head into March 28 FTSE decision, followed by MSCI in June. \nOur base case is for a positive outcome for both EM index reviews. \n• Tadawul +5% past 3 sessions printing new 3 year highs, Foreign inflows YTD at $1.35bn \n• Recent headline on Aramco: Saudi Aramco likely to be delayed to 2019. Delay not all together surprising giving complexity of the transaction, delays in choosing \nthe trading venues, as well as to better align the IPO with potential MSCI / FTSE index inflow timelines \n• Crown Prince MBS will appear on '60 Minutes' on March 18th, one day before he lands in the US for a 10 day tour, meeting Trump on the 20th. \n• Reform agenda picking up speed: Women Driving; Entertainment/Movie Theaters; Welfare Programs; Market access reforms & Intl debt issues \nSaudi Fundamentals are strong (see Jean-Michel Saliba's report from Jan. 29th below): \n• Growth has bottomed out \n• OPEC is succeeding at rebalancing the oil market. Fiscal adjustment now sufficient to safeguard stability at cUS$60/bbl. \n• Equity strategy: remain positive, outlook gains momentum - We retain our positive view on the Saudi market as we see strong earnings \nmomentum as well as increasing appetite for Saudi equities amongst global investors: \nBest way to access the trade: IX/MAP (MSCI Saudi Provisional Index) \n• 32-name MSCI-owned index, that will rebalance into the full MSCI EM index upon inclusion \n• Trades $90m/ day based on bottleneck liquidity \n• Tradable on swap at lmL+90bps, std comm applies; also accessible on fully funded Luxembourg-listed warrant (MERRI1DT LX) \n10 single stock names to own in Saudi \n• Al Rajhi: BAML Top pick for 2018 » Largest bank in Saudi » Reflation trade beneficiary » We see the bank continuing to deliver strong earnings momentum on \nthe back of: (1) Stand out NIM expansion given a unique cost of funding position and further policy rate hikes (2) a continued normalization in asset quality \ndriving CoR lower; (3) Higher loan growth than peers as it benefits from consumer loan growth (particularly housing) whilst taking share in the corporate market and \n(4) Al Rajhi is set to be a key beneficiary from the potential forthcoming Saudi index inclusions. \n• NCB: We see NCB as a key beneficiary from the economic diversification program the Government has introduced. Its large balance sheet and resulting ability to \nfinance mega projects should allow it to capture market share in the coming years. Further support will come from having the PIF as a major shareholder. We also see \na sublime margin outlook given NCB's ability to benefit from rising interest rates and bond yields. \n• SABIC: Expect strong earnings momentum in FY18E driven by robust product prices as well as solid plant operations. View company's intent to expand \ninternationally as a catalyst for unlocking balance sheet value. The company is expected to be the largest constituent of Saudi MSCI EM Index (-16%). Shares trade at a \n2018E EV/EBITDA of 7.4x, —20% discount vs global peers. \n• Yansab: Given robust MEG pricing outlook (40% of profits, prices up 18% YTD) providing a healthy tailwind to earnings this year, we expect an attractive dividend \nyield of 6% (top quartile globally) in FY18E/19E well supported by FCF yields of 9% and a net cash position. \n• SIC: One of the main beneficiaries of index inflows into Saudi. STC has finally improved management representation to investors with the departure of the \nprevious IR, and new team in place. Significant government receivables recovery to drive stock price for next two quarters, while Careem stake can provide some \npositive headline risk on valuations. \n• Jarir: We like Jarir for its potential to increase its market penetration having increased its store count by 13% since August 2017 while maintaining its premium \nROE of 53% and attractive dividend. \n• Al Tayyar : Stock will see a slew of positive catalysts over the next two quarters, particularly a second tranche of substantial gov receivable recoveries in Ql. \n130mn SAR loss from associates in 2017 is a one off and should make comps easier this year. Q1 earnings should see the first earnings growth after a very difficult 2 \nyears. Makkah real estate REIT will also provide an uplift. \n• Al Hokair: has massively under performed in Saudi index and consumer sector and should see substantial improvement in business in 2018 as LFL turns the \ncorner and the company businesses a beneficiary from social reforms in the country. Debt restructuring concerns likely behind us at this point, relief there would be \nthe main catalyst for the name. \n• Malath / Alrajhi Takaful: 2 of the top motor insurers in Saudi secular growth trend in motor insurance sector over the next two years as the regulator clamps \ndown on more than 50% uninsured drivers while women driving to present multiyear volume growth story.\n\nCole Mackay, CFA, Director \nEmerging Europe, Middle East & Africa Equity Sales \nBank of America Merrill Lynch"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2018 4:51:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Other ways to trade Saudi", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Ens, Amanda"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 14, 2018 12:46 PM", "subject": "MEGA Trade --> Long Saudi...", "body": "Opening New MEGA Trade:  \nLong Saudi Equities ( Buy M1SAP on Swap / Liquidity $100mm a Day)  \n- Potentially the EM Flow Story of 2018... if FTSE addition is announced on March 28th we expect an inflow of \n$5bn on a basket which trades 100mm USD a day (50X ADV)... this is even before MSCI announcement in June \nwhere inflows could be substantially higher \nThe Most Powerful Macro Trades are when Macro Fundemantals + Flow Meet... This is Saudi in 2018 \nKey Points:  \n1. Saudi has significantly underperformed Oil by 14% last 6 months. With the recent introduction of the citizens account programme, \nsubsidy cuts, pushing out the budget balance to 2023, and the news of increased handouts, Saudi should re correlate with oil and move higher \nfrom here. \n2. Saudi equities remain under-owned globally --) foreign ownership of Saudi equities is at 1.3% vs Russia 70%, Turkey 55%, South Africa \n50%, Brazil 45%, UAE 20%, Qatar 10% \n3. Good liquidity vs other EMs but volume trading at lows relative to history -4 Tadawul ADV close to all-time lows at $1bn (10yr range is \n$1-8bn) \n4. Major index events in 2018/19 with FTSE announcement on 28th March next catalyst-4 FTSE announcement could trigger inflows of up \nto $5bn . Combined with the MSCI announcement later this year, potential active and passive inflows can total $15-$40bn. So the potential of at  \nleast $20bn inflows on a basket which trades 100mm USD a day (200 Days Volume) ?  \n5. In comparison, during the MSCI UAE and Qatar inclusions, UAE was trading 10% below historic avg @14x PE and rerated to 22x into MSCI \nEM inclusion with Dubai up +110% (vs +47% prey year). Qatar was trading inline with historic avg @11x PE and rerated to 18x MSCI EM inclusion \nwith Qatar up +60% (vs +9% prey year) \n6. Saudi risk indicators at 2015 pre-crisis levels 4 Saudi 5yr CDS is trading at 76 vs 40-210 3yr range; SAR 2yr fwd suggests market is less \nworried about depeg fears and forward points can be used as a macro hedge \n7. Valuations & dividend yields remain attractive 4 Market trades at a 10% discount (13.5x) to its historic PE (Saudi PE range is 10-\n26x). Avg dividend yield is 3.6% with 45 stocks yield more than 4%. \nOur Middle East Team ready for Calls - Ha mdy Hamoudi in London next week 19th-23rd March. Talal marketing in US 23rd-27th April. Marwan in \nTrading\n\nHootan Yazhari, CFA \nResearch Analyst \nMerrill Lynch (DIFC)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033502.txt_18333
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033502.txt
subject: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell, CP, FRS", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson", "Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Brad"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\n\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know.\n\nJess —"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031565.txt_18343
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031565.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 13, 2018, at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural \ncommittee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on \nThursday, citing people familiar with the matter. \nThe probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the \ncommittee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing \nadministration positions or access to the incoming administration, the Journal said. \nRead Newsmax: WSJ: Federal Prosecutors Probing Trump Inauguration Spending \nUrgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump's job performance? Vote Here Now!"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/13/2018 10:03:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Read it. TB has big problems"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028752.txt_18350
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028752.txt
subject: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cecilia Schött", "recipients": ["Barbro Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "August 18, 2012 8:44:29 AM GMT+02:00", "subject": "Program & Attendee list", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep\nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this\nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\nBut he is a bit busy I gather!\nAnyway, hope Greta Tufvesson got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail\nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda and she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\nLet me know what you think!\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend Goldsamt! First prize for perseverance!\nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful\nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!\n\nKRAM\nBE"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}, {"sender": "BARBRO EHNBOM", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/20/2012 1:23:57 PM", "subject": "Program & Attendee list", "body": "How about this year's SALSS Project Manager - brainy and sensual!\n\nPicture attached!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031203.txt_18352
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031203.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 131 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Bennet J. Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 1:37:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR \nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD \nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS . \nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP \nWHITE HOUSE POLICY. \nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON \nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN \nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T \nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE \nUSA. \nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO \nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016. \nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR \nESIDENT TRUMP !!!!! \nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE. \nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM \nBER!!!!! \nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST \nJEFF EPSTEIN !!!! \nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE \nGIRLS !!!!!! \nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE \nRECORDED BY JEFF EPSTEIN !!!!! \nJEFF EPSTEIN IS NOT IN FEDERAL PRISON ONLY BECAUSE JEFF EPSTEIN IS HOLDING TH \nE ABOVE PICTURES !!!!!! \nTHANK YOU SIR \nGO PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt_18353
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
subject: Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Justin Blackhall", "recipients": ["William L. Blum", "Robert A. Solomon"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:06:39 PM EST", "subject": "front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-as-virgin-islands-tax-adviser"}, {"sender": "William L. Blum", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals", "Edward B. Reynolds, Jr."], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:26:26 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "Did you guys see this?\n\nBill"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:41:17 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/1/2012 3:54:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021641.txt_18357
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021641.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11 25/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11 25/2008", "body": "[| considers this lead covered.\n\npO"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031813.txt_18359
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031813.txt
subject: Re: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett PO", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 13, 2018, at 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Again?? How many puts ? What are the alternatives. The fact tgat you iwn thd stock at a higher price is\naffecting your decision. Sorry. This is judt ridiculous!!! Would you buy the stock here . ???? If you would\nwould you also buy puts ??? My patience is at its end"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "i believe he is married to broadcom as has he got stuck with stock on both 4,000 lots from selling puts .."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 13, 2018, at 2:41 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Did he sell naked puts??"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:46:14 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "1 do not believe so..\n1 will look into exact trades.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033264.txt_18363
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033264.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:00:32 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: — High\n\nhttp://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031344.txt_18367
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031344.txt
subject:
  Jerrold Nadler's investigation seems rigged to me: Why are two leading Trump foes heading up his probe? - New York Daily News

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/6/2019 6:26:30 PM", "subject": "Jerrold Nadler's investigation seems rigged to me: Why are two leading Trump foes heading up his probe? - New York Daily News", "body": "Importance: High\n\nhttps://ww. nydai lynews. com/opinion/ny-oped-jerrold-nadlers-investigation-seems-rigged-to-me-20190305-story.htm"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030413.txt_18372
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030413.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Korp"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 3:50:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430906-senate-investigators-want-to-question-russia-based-businessman-tied-to-trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030375.txt_18374
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030375.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430906-senate-investigators-want-to-question-russia-based-businessman-tied-to-trump"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 4:49:48 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Called and left a vm.\n\nBrad"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032983.txt_18375
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032983.txt
subject: Re: Masa
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2o17/03/o3/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event.\nI know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not opposed."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:27:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "great , thanks, or new york , or this weekend as donald arrives at 5pm tonight"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029624.txt_18376
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029624.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayer"], "timestamp": "10/16/2009 11:20:59 AM", "subject": null, "body": "just as we thought------ Russian bank Sberbank has quietly taken over his Capital Group's biggest asset, a massive housing, shops and offices project called Gorod Stolits, in Moskva-City on Moscow's outskirts. Under a $400 million (£270 million) loan agreement, the bank will ensure construction of the complex goes ahead at the end of the year as planned by Doronin, who has been likened to Donald Trump."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031422.txt_18378
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031422.txt
subject: Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2015 3:47:18 AM", "subject": "Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": "Check out trump"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Friday, 27 February 2015 21:00", "subject": "Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024395.txt_18390
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024395.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 8:10:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt_18393
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:19:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she \nseems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship \nCommison it came through Woody and because she bundled best Jonathan \n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030486.txt_18399
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030486.txt
subject: this is the type of crazy frank rich nytimes that screams be careful
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "PETER MANDELSON"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 24 2010 02:57 PM", "subject": "this is the type of crazy frank rich nytimes that screams be careful", "body": "Kennedy didn't settle for the generic populist rhetoric of Obama's latest threats to \"fight\" unspecified bankers \nsome indeterminate day. He instead took the strong action of dressing down U.S. Steel by name. As Richard \nReeves writes in his book \"President Kennedy,\" reporters were left \"literally gasping.\" The young president \ncalled out big steel for threatening \"economic recovery and stability\" while Americans risked their lives in \nSoutheast Asia. J.F.K. threatened to sic his brother's Justice Department on corporate records and then held \nfirm as his opponents likened his flex of muscle to the power grabs of Hitler and Mussolini. (Sound familiar?) \nU.S. Steel capitulated in two days. The Times soon reported on its front page that Kennedy was at \"a high point \nin popular support.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033337.txt_18400
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033337.txt
subject: FW:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 5:58:37 PM", "subject": "FW:", "body": "Jeff — one of my friends sent me this today — it is the press release of the day I left DJT — how well I remember — I thought u would get a kick out of it -- Nick"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935.txt_18404
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative . ? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests. . mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos . ? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien, under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave, his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "maybe you can ask why bernie nussbaum got vince fosters letter quickly, that is a hillary problem. he would smile then you can ask his realtionsjipwith the elctricians unions and maralago . and out you go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What's the thumb nail on Nussbaum/foster?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "nussbaum white house counsel.. hillary doing naughties with vince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:23:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What was the letter?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031350.txt_18405
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031350.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/24/2014 8:25:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you set up Google Chrome and use Incognito Mode?\n\nIf you search while signed into your Google account is impacts things, but using Incognito mode will resolve that.\n\nChrome here https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/\n\nOnce installed...\n\nOpen an incognito window\n\n3.\n\nEo\n\nClick the Chrome menu |__| on the browser toolbar.\n\nSelect New incognito window.\n\nA new window will open with the incognito icon in the corner.\n\nYou can also use the keyboard shortcuts Ctrl+Shift+N (Windows, Linux, and Chrome OS) and ¢€-Shift-N (Mac) to open\n\nan incognito window."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new computer virgin isalnds"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Mr. Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We currently have two negatives on first page in Google but one is at 6th and the other at 7th. (Universal\nsearch, no history applied). Results will be very different if that PC has been used to click or search any of the\nresults and has not been cleared.\n\nHow did you pull the results you just sent?\n\nUsing Google Chrome + InCognito Mode + Clearing Browser Cache = only reliable reporting. I can help set\nyou up with this. Screenshot here of results using above method - http://.imgur.com/tfGN3Zj.png. This is the\ntrue representation of what your average searcher will find (statistically, most searches will be from users\nwhom have not clicked on your negative articles before)\n\nMuch progress has been made since we spoke - premium placements are getting secured over next week,\nhundreds of links have been built to your primary sites and the first movements are kicking in today (NY Mag\nmoved up to 4th a few hours ago). We still have confidence we are on the right track and doing everything we\ncan to get this cleaned up - another 45 days should be enough to have a clean first page based on what has\nbeen done."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025598.txt_18423
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025598.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 18 2019 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver-\nsacks-gardens.html?action=click\n&module=Opinion &pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I’m good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im\nyour boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!\n\nSS"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is\ngetting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028506.txt_18426
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028506.txt
subject: Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard John Nawrot", "recipients": ["Terje Rod-Larsen"], "timestamp": "May 23, 2017 at 15:13:12 GMT+4", "subject": "US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": "Terje, the attached article appeared in todays FT, I have removed the defence part related to the US$110bn arms\ndeal but highlighted the separate deal done with Blackstone to establish a fund for US infrastructure this is akin\n/ precedent to what we seek to achieve with SAMA focused on global investment fund in Airport Infrastructure\n\n— Best Richard."}, {"sender": "Terje Rod-Larsen", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 11:19:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030349.txt_18427
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030349.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 30, 2017 10:50 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}, {"sender": "Leon Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:52:45 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey- can’t print this and when we try- it messes up the computer. Perhaps you can have Lesley scan it — or show it to Leon this afternoon. Thanks, Melanie"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032767.txt_18431
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032767.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will probably hire dershowitz, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 4:43:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-13000-obtaining-evidence#9-13.420"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt_18438
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i ee"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "ES", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 2:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I saw that, amazing.\nI also think it's shocking she is 35 in the recent picture (if she was 13 in '94). She looks 20 years older."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032773.txt_18439
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032773.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can't get to Boston tomorrow—but thanks for inviting. Where in NYT did you see this—can't find."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nyt says trump talking directly to steve"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030714.txt_18444
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030714.txt
subject: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/16/2018 11:19:55 AM", "subject": "Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU", "body": "https://ww.geopolitica.ru/en/article/skripal-syria-and-england-are-all-victims-globalist-war-trump\n\nDugan's analysis with shout out"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026233.txt_18457
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026233.txt
subject: Re: TSA PBI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 20, 2017 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "Jeffrey \nWhile Trump is in PBI, TSA only allows arrival and departures between 8am and 5pm for General Aviation. \nI made a resv for Nov 26th at 8am to St Thomas\nPassengers: You and\nI can make passenger changes up to 24 Hours before Departure, they also request if we are traveling with an animal.\nFYI,\nThey also ask if Passengers are Male or Female, strange, they didn't ask names.\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 20, 2017 8:29 pm", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "might make more sense to reposition on sat to boca?"}, {"sender": "Lvjet", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:37:36 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "yes, that makes sense,\nok, I'll re-position to Boca on Saturday, ill make resv for departure for Dave and I,\nthx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029100.txt_18458
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029100.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/30/2017 6:18:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "had a great conversation with Martin. He loves you. I'm also glad that what he said about you pretty much matches what I thought of you :-)\nWorking on finding/choosing right reporters for the story. Will keep you posted"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 2:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still waiting Nowak to respond about when he can call(I'll keep following up with him, not a prob)\nFound this looking for the details of what is happening with the federal budget for science\nhttp s ://www.congress .gov/congressional-report/115th-congress/house-report/231/1\nHere's a list of outlets to approach about what you are going to bridge the funding gap:\n* MIT Technology Review\n* Nature\n* Washington Post\n* Science\n* Wall Street Journal\n* WIRED\nTopic to approach\nhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-21/for-the-impact-of-trump-slashing-science-funding-look-north?utm content=politics&utm campaign=socialflow-organic&utm source=twitter&utm medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-politics"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 1:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Progress?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023635.txt_18468
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023635.txt
subject:
  Fwd: EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....

messages:
  [{"sender": "Ozan Tarman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:40 AM", "subject": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....", "body": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows;\nChristmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but\nmajority still made good money because Hillary bets worked as Trump trades.\n\nWider, steeper core rates, stronger USD, weaker EM is the Rage. The last one, EM, is the big loser out of\nTrump Reflation Theme. DM over EM and divergence within DM are very much in vogue. All gains of EMBI\nsince March are gone!\n\nFor Rates & FX, it does feel like early days of Taper Tantrum trade of 3 years ago. Both dominated by US price\naction. In both, hedge funds have now caught the moves, play offense & ride the Trump narrative. Real Money\nis on the ropes, caught long Fixed Income/duration/carry and cannot play defense fearing Outflows.\n\nIn Emerging Markets, most outflows are retail, ETF driven. All eyes on next leg of institutions. In equities,\nbanks big winners; FANGs losing. I asked partners 2 questions. 1) Would the \"this will be great for business,\nfeel good factor\" wave out-run \"if real yields go up, equities are a sell\" fear. Clients are torn, but the former,\nbullish camp wins for now, my colleagues suggest. There are skeptics though.\n\n2) In Europe, do fears over Renzi losing & Le Pen winning climb over the big momentum behind banks etc.\nAgain, my equity team suggests, \"no, reflation wave may win over Italy referendum anxiety,, for now.\" Renzi is\nnow widely expected to lose, so a \"yes\" would be the big surprise trade. And the bigger elephant in the room is\nLe Pen. If she wins in May, Europe as we know it may really shake.. But for now this is more in the radars of\nEuro & EBG traders.\n\nCore rates are driven by the speed of TY sell-off. And in GS FX, the big driver is USD/JPY. The stronger \"we\nshould believe in Trump reflation narrative\" winds are, the more USD/JPY buyers we see.\n\nSome in Research warn that Trump may succeed in \"tax cuts, faster than any infrastructure spending,\" but few\nmacro are in mood to listen. A few players believe, looking at trade weights of each with US and magnitude of\nsell-off, Asia FX may have more weakness to come than MXN. Will copper/infrastructure rally eventually help\nChile?"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 3:32:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....", "body": "The latest thinking from London hedge fund crowd"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt_18470
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt
subject: RE: Sam Fields on 302 Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ken Jenne", "recipients": ["Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 17:44:42", "subject": "RE: Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "FDLE is even worst.\n\nRothstein Rosenfeldt Adler\n401 E Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1650 |\nFort Lauderdale, FL 33301"}, {"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Ken Jenne"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 12, 2009 3:48 PM", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI\n\nBY SAM FIELDS\nGuest Columnist\n\nActually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called in federal court \"The 302\", It\ncould screw the innocent and the unwary."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt_18476
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 3:30:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you have 5 minutes today? You could actually help me on something I think...(mizrahi bank wants to hire me)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt_18477
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt
subject: Trump's 6727 sold for 2.7M,
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. Vacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Rich Kahn", "B727", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/27/2011 4:34:44 PM", "subject": "Trump's 6727 sold for 2.7M,", "body": "Trump's 6727 sold for 2.7M,.\nSean very discussed with me this company was interested, unless he call you,.\nFrom Sean:\nThis buyer did have specs on your aircraft. They were looking at a 3.0 million budget but did not make\nan offer and it was too low. We did discuss it"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011962.txt_18482
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011962.txt
subject: FW: Press Inquiry from AFP (Agence France Presse) Videographer--Michelle Stockman
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michelle Stockman <Michelle.Stockman@afp.com>", "recipients": ["lorraine@mc2mm.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 27, 2010 11:03 AM", "subject": "Press Inquiry from AFP (Agence France Presse) Videographer--Michelle Stockman", "body": "My name is Michelle Stockman and I am a video journalist for Agence France Presse, the French newswire. We produce 1.5 to 2 min. videos that are distributed internationally to broadcast clients in Europe and Asia, and internet clients worldwide. In preparation for Fashion Week, my print colleague and I are interested in doing a piece on trends in casting models of color. I was wondering if you could refer me to a model of color and a casting director who can comment on her experience.\n\nMy deadline is next week, so I would like to set something up for Monday or Tuesday. I can come to you as I am a one-person camera crew. When you have a moment, please let me know. I'd be happy to discuss with you over the phone ahead of time.\n\nBest regards,\nMichelle Stockman"}, {"sender": "Lorraine <lorraine@mc2mm.com>", "recipients": ["jeff@mc2mm.com", "Jean Luc Brunel <jeanluc@mc2mm.com>", "Pink <pink@mc2mm.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 27, 2010 at 8:49 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Inquiry from AFP (Agence France Presse) Videographer--Michelle Stockman", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023621.txt_18484
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023621.txt
subject: Re: Larry Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kelly Friendly <kfriendly@sss>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein:\n\nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. Catherine and I flew home today with\nMr. Farkas and his family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer.\nAndrew and Caroline are still stuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car.\n\nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us.\n\nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard.\n\nFondly,\nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 6, 2014, at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad it worked out. if you husband woudl like to see the island this week i will arrange it."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Andrew and BE would love to come see the island! I've cced him to work out the details....\nHappy New Year!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 6, 2014, at 7:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "send me andrews details."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "He can be reached at:\n\nKelly Friendly"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025215.txt_18494
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025215.txt
subject: Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth\nstocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle. Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on\nTV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen. I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good\nhamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling\n\ndiscussions. Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt\nceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency. The implication: reservations about raising\nthe debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then. This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt\nceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States. Today, the\nproposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues. While a default\nis a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is\nbad as well. Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal\nReserve would keep yields in check. That logic is irresponsible at best. Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way\nfor a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest.\n\nDebtlimit debate of the 80's: anentirely different discussion\nPercent Multiple\n110%\n\n100%\n\nReagan scolds Debt limit to\n\nCongressional GDP\nRepublicans for not —\n\nraising the debt\n\nceiling YS\n\n, , + . + .\n1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010\n\nDebt limit to\ngov. receipts\nnd\n\nSource: OMB, BEA, J.P. Morgan Private Bank\n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been\nraised up the flagpole and then lowered. By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3\ntrillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all). However,\nCongress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first. For now,\nwe wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to. Last week’s Profiles in Courage\npiece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here. Here’s our take on what\nhas been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what\nsteps they recommend to get to that baseline first. For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s\nbudget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71%\ndebt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030445.txt_18497
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030445.txt
subject: John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb
messages:
  [{"sender": "Intelligence Squared", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/14/2019 6:32:20 AM", "subject": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb", "body": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb\nView in browser\nJohn Humphrys:\nThe Terrier of Today\nWEDNESDAY 9TH OCTOBER, 7PM\nEMMANUEL CENTRE\nFeaturing John Humphrys and Justin Webb\nBUY TICKETS\n\n'I'm not sure I'd like me if I was listening to me.' — John Humphrys\n\nJohn Humphrys is the Radio 4 Today programme presenter, whose forensic and sometimes\naggressive interviews with figures in authority inspire love and loathing in equal measure. The\nObserver's television critic once wrote that if he ever found himself sitting next to Humphrys at a\ndinner party he would probably drive a fork through his hand. The Tory politician Jonathan\nAitken accused him of 'poisoning the well of democratic debate', a comment which prompted an\noutburst of support for Humphrys, with the Daily Mail describing him as one of the most brilliant\njournalists in the country'.\n\nThis autumn, as Humphrys steps down after 32 years at Today and publishes a long-awaited\nmemoir, he comes to the Intelligence Squared stage to give an exclusive, behind-the-scenes\naccount of his extraordinary career.\n\nTurning the tables on Humphrys and pitching the questions will be his Today colleague Justin\nWebb. Humphrys will recount the momentous episodes of his career, such as his interview with\nBBC correspondent Andrew Gilligan in 2003. Gilligan claimed that the government had\ndeliberately 'sexed up' the dossier on the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in order to justify\nthe Iraq War. A chain of events ensued, including the suicide of the dossier's source, Dr David\nKelly, severe damage to Tony Blair's reputation and the Hutton and Chiloot inquiries into the\nwar. And then there was the time Humphrys helped to get his own boss fired. His tough\ninterview with the BBC Director General George Entwistle, days after the BBC had made false\nchild abuse allegations against Lord McAlpine, lead to Entwistle's resignation after a mere 53\ndays in the job.\n\nJoin us on October 9 and hear Humphrys' previously untold stories about politicians, celebrities\nand the BBC, and give his trenchant views on the role of the media in politics and the health of\nour political system.\n\nJohn Humphrys\nAward-winning journalist who has been one of the presenters of\nBBC Radio 4's flagship news and current affairs programme Today\nsince January 1987. During his career with the BBC, he has also\nworked as a foreign correspondent in both America and Africa, as\nwell as being a diplomatic correspondent and presenter of the Nine\nO'Clock News. He has presented Panorama, fronts On the Ropes\non Radio 4 and presents Mastermind on BBC Two. His has written\ntwo books on the English language, Lost For Words: The Mangling\nand Manipulating of the English Language and Beyond Words:\nHow Language Reveals the Way We Live Now.\n\nJustin Webb\nOne of the presenters of Radio 4's Today programme. He was the\nBBC's North America Editor for 8 years, covering the 9/11 attacks\nand the election of President Obama. He writes regularly for the\nRadio Times and reviews books for the Sunday Times."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt_18502
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt
subject: Re: Deal info
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anthony"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:27:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "funn, but quite a mess"}, {"sender": "A Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "Hi jeffrey,\n\nCam across this...perhaps you have some interest?\n\nRelated Companies affiliate bids $32M for\nembattled Palm House Hotel\n\nThe New York company, led by Stephen Ross, made a stalking horse bid for the Palm\nBeach condo-hotel project that is heading to auction\n\nBy Keith Larsen | October 11, 2018 06:15PM"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt_18513
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt
subject: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 18, 2012 8:44:29 AM GMT+02:00", "subject": "Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep\nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this\nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\nBut he is a bit busy I gather!\nAnyway, hope Greta Tufvesson got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail\nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda\nand she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\nLet me know what you think!\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend Goldsamt!\nFirst prize for perseverance!\nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful!\nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!\nKRAM\nBE"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?\n- brainy and sensual!"}, {"sender": "BARBRO EHNBOM", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/20/2012 1:23:57 PM", "subject": "How about this year's SALSS Project Manager", "body": "How about this year's SALSS Project Manager\nPicture attached!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt_18532
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn’t offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also,\ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down\nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On conference finish in 10 min"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:27:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The rich and powerful ALWAYS send lawyers letters . A book about any one of them takes more time to\npublish as I must be -and Iam , meticulous about documentation and back up"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt_18547
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt
subject: Re: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication\nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke <111MIMM>"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:11 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:26 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026047.txt_18565
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026047.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 19, 2016 3:01 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "is there something you want to tell me?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have an idea."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So What Does Pizzagate Have To Do With President Bill Clinton?\n\nPresident Clinton’s involvement in Pizzagate has been peripheral until now, but the scandal is opening closets that both Bill and Hillary Clinton would have wished stayed closed. However, last month, the Guardian reported that during the second presidential debate, Donald Trump brought along four women who have accused Bill Clinton of sex crimes, including rape.\n\nThe U.K. broadsheet surmised that this was an attempt by Trump to deflect from allegations of misogyny and sexual misconduct by Trump himself. As time has passed, the specter of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has re-emerged. It is perhaps Clinton’s relationship with Epstein that has the greatest bearing on Pizzagate."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2016 5:06:06 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Yikes...my boy jeffrey is everywhere..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021442.txt_18572
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021442.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/21/2007
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Tampa"], "timestamp": "03/21/2007", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/21/2007", "body": "LEAD (s):\nSet Lead 1: (Info)\nTAMPA\n\nAT ORLANDO, FL\n\nFBI Miami request travel concurrence from FBI Tampa\nto conduct victim/witness interview."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030478.txt_18593
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030478.txt
subject: Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Thomas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 5:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...", "body": "Do you know anyone/fund out there who made an early investment call on the middle east going to hell and loaded up on oil futures or some such to take advantage?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:07:11 -0800", "subject": "Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...", "body": "i know a few „ 01 ask"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 6:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...", "body": "Thanks."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 11:48:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...", "body": "I see you released a statement. Good move. You should tell people that all this stuff happened years ago."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt_18604
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:02:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "StiIIIIIIIIIIIIII just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I will let you know when I go back. Do you know her?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? i m between alber and santa fe„ zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazovithe-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt_18606
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt
subject: Re: My datebook
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Woltt [a"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:49:52 AM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": "Three hours with SB who believes DJT won’t last to the mid terms. Also saw Brad Karp who is super menchy\nand offering much help on next book."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026053.txt_18624
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026053.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 7:14 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "hope you are having as much fun as me"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 8:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I wish...\nGot super bed cold two days ago and barely left my bed. Feel like shit.\n\nMerry Christmas to you!\nB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 8:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry to haer"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 8:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When are you back in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 8:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "4th im in palm with all the trump boys. . fun"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/26/2016 1:19:46 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Have fun!!\nHope to see you on the 4th.\n| leave for SF on the 5th"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032955.txt_18632
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032955.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "1/9/2017 6:56:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-barrack-inauguration-20170109-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019359.txt_18635
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019359.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM, 07/24/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM, 07/24/2006", "body": "It is requested by captioned case be opened and sa[____] that the above assigned."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt_18639
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack
messages:
  [{"sender": "Comms Alert <CommsAlert@gop.com>", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients"], "timestamp": "May 5, 2018 at 1:19:54 PM EDT", "subject": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack\nAssociated Press\nTom LoBianco\nMay 5, 2018\nhttps://apnews.com/6dd33b4234634079821e5825f112e85b?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter\n\nWASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that investigators working with special counsel Robert Mueller have interviewed Tom Barrack, a close friend and confidant of President Donald Trump.\nThree people familiar with the probe tell the AP that Barrack met with federal investigators working on the Russia inquiry.\nThe people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.\nBarrack's spokeswoman, Lisa Baker, declined to comment.\nBarrack has known Trump for decades. He's been one of Trump's closest advisers through the 2016 campaign and into the administration. Barrack also is a leading fundraiser for the president and oversaw the fundraising for the inauguration.\nBarrack has a longstanding relationship with Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and Manafort's onetime deputy, Rick Gates.\nGates agreed to begin cooperating with Mueller's investigators in February."}, {"sender": "Jason Miller", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 5 May 2018 13:43:02 -0400", "subject": "Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/6/2018 1:54:36 AM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates served this brother up"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031392.txt_18648
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031392.txt
subject: Re: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:21:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January\n15, 2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that\ncase if confirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nOO 0000\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims.\n\nSr\n\nEne?\n\nThe reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. “BJay” Pak, will\noversee the case for the government. Pak, a former Georgia lawmaker, was appointed Atlanta’s chief federal\n\nprosecutor by President Trump in October 2017."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt_18649
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 20, 2018 11:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is going to represent stephen halper. that will be fun"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 20, 2018 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hes the fbi informant. Mi5 cia, oy."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Educate me"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/20/2018 8:02:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "aus citizen, working formi5 . calls trump campaign insiders and tryr to get info for mi5 and\nfbi. . including after trunmp takes office.. 1 did obama know'? if us citizen working for britain\nspies. can they spy on americans? who pays. paid. wild. donald focused on this bigtime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 20, 2018 at 9:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Oy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt_18656
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt
subject: Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jakob Kéllhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\njust back from a long tour ,,on origins”.\n\nAs promised you will get my message promptly.\n\nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget implies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily on amounts in ,,kilos”. (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before deadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum).\n\nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment.\n\nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines.\n\nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come.\n\nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Kraus", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 6:06:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 cancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the other place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am going to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could take a hitchhiker. :)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026232.txt_18658
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026232.txt
subject: TSA PBI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 12:23:47 AM", "subject": "TSA PBI", "body": "Jeffrey \nWhile Trump is in PSI, TSA only allows arrival and departures between Sam and 5pm for General Aviation. \nI made a resv for Nov 26th at Sam to St Thomas„ \nPassengers: You and \nI can make passenger changes up to 24 Hours before Departure, they also request if we are traveling with \nan animal., FYI, \nThey also ask if Passengers are Male or Female, strange, they didn't ask names. \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032941.txt_18663
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032941.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:25:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033487.txt_18664
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033487.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Boeing", "Jeffrey and Sean"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 7:25:19 PM", "subject": "", "body": "I heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine \noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total,.. \nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing \nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,. \nthx, \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030715.txt_18676
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030715.txt
subject: Re: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon <P>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU", "body": "https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/skripal-syria-and-england-are-all-victims-globalist-war-trum\n\nDugan's analysis with shout out"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2018, at 7:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU", "body": "did you enjoy last night. . leon doesnt listen as much as he should. but he isa good guy. Im in palm beach\nfor the weekend. next week if you like Kathy ruemmler. or reid weingarten and or miro lacjak."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/16/2018 11:25:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump | Geopolitica.RU", "body": "Last night great---really liked those guys\nI'm back Tuesday"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029854.txt_18683
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029854.txt
subject: Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm al or my desk i\n\nThanks,\n\nAshley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "do you want it? or jared?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 9:28:04 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Do I have the choice? And if so, your view?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028513.txt_18686
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028513.txt
subject: Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial — Will He Be Held Accountable?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Intelligence Squared [info@intelligencesquared.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/12/2019 11:23:58 AM", "subject": "Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial — Will He Be Held Accountable?", "body": "Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial — Will He Be Held Accountable?\n\nMark Zuckerberg on Trial:\nFacebook is Damaging Society"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025908.txt_18692
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025908.txt
subject: Fwd: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST", "subject": "RE: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\nWe will of course do this in whatever sequence makes sense for you. It goes without saying that any move would need to make economic sense. My assumption has been that your comp would fall outside of our \"bell curve\", but that is not an issue for us as long as the potential contribution also falls outside. You would not be the only partner outside the curve, and I am comfortable with expanding that group for people who can genuinely move the needle while embracing the culture that makes us who we are.\nOne benefit of having Michael in the mix is that he can provide a global perspective, and he would be important for explaining the case outside the US if we moved forward.\nJust let me know when and how you want to speak next.\nBest,\nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve,\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more specific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, but as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition to being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!\nBest,\nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Follow up", "body": "Kathy\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International Arbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish upbringing.\nLet me know.\nBest,\nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 7:20:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Follow up", "body": "Unsatisfactory"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032766.txt_18704
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032766.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 2:18:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "chat? #?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump likely to hire dershowitz, no kidding"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028507.txt_18708
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028507.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:23:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "explain"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Heidi a little bit | don't think it will turn into romance | am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems\nintelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came\nthrough Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026090.txt_18709
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026090.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\n\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\n\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the\nYemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to\nYemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\n\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\n\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international\npressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace\nefforts.\n\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,” he noted."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi\nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon. email you after. how much\nfun"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think .. and if peace agreement\nwas signed in kuwait that would be weed"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www. jpost.com/Opinion/Candidly-Speaking-Lauder-promoting-A bbas-as-moderate-is-fraught-with-\ndanger-490630 he just left my house when you arrived. he is the key for you, I understand Dubai"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 2:05:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dubai is great bid"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030348.txt_18710
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030348.txt
subject: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Glenn Dubin", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 15 2017 02:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/15/arts/donald- trump-saturday-night-live.html?smprod=nytcore- ipad\n&smid=nytcore- ipad-share\n\nThe actor Alec Baldwin, ina parody of Mr. Trump’s first news conference as president-elect, began by vowing\n\nto answer what he said was “the question that’s on everyone’s mind.”"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033098.txt_18725
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033098.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018 at 8:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\n\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:42:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not that i know . I would doubt it. He was totally predictable!! Not sure why it is not obvious, can explain on phone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030729.txt_18726
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030729.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern OY", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in\nlondon. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern {qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\nIam in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to fin russia id appreciate it. . dont\nknow parties. ridetolondon . shesa futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 13:05", "subject": "Re:", "body": "they are lost"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:08:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let’s show them the way - Baruch HaShem"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033336.txt_18735
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033336.txt
subject: Chris Christie says he declined offer to be Trump's next chief of staff
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 6:42:54 PM", "subject": "Chris Christie says he declined offer to be Trump's next chief of staff", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/12/14/chris-christie-says-he-declined-offer-to-be-trumps-next-chief-of-staff/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20181214&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-7498464-719004712"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030487.txt_18736
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030487.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: MONITORING PA - DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET
messages:
  [{"sender": "Power Peter ACOMMS <power.peter@acomm.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fw: MONITORING PA - DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET", "body": "Fyi\n\nSent from my BlackBerry® wireless device"}, {"sender": "\"Power Peter ACOMMS\" <power.peter@acomm.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:55:16 -0000", "subject": "Fw: MONITORING PA - DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["COMMS - Press Office Monitoring", "COMMS - Press Office Operational"], "timestamp": "Sun Jan 24 13:01:39 2010", "subject": "MONITORING PA - DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET", "body": "DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET\nHMI CITY Darling\nTopic CITY\nPublished 24 Jan 2010 - 12:22\nBy Holly Williams, Press Association City Staff\nPage 1: 12:22\nChancellor Alistair Darling has sent out a warning shot to America not to go it alone with bank sector reforms, it was reported today.\nIn an interview with The Sunday Times, Mr Darling cautioned that President Barack Obama's war on Wall Street announced last week\ncould harm international co-ordination.\nHe called for unity among the G20 nations and also said the moves to curb banks would not have prevented the fmancial crisis.\n\"If everyone does their own thing it will achieve absolutely nothing,\" said Mr Darling.\nHe added: \"The banks are global - they are quite capable of organising themselves in such a way that if the regime is difficult in one\ncountry, they will go to another one and that doesn't do anyone any good.\"\nThe US president sent shockwaves through the banking sector on both sides of the Atlantic with last week's announcement of proposals to\nlimit the activities of banks.\nThe plans include a ban on retail banks from using their own money in investments, instead of being limited to investing their customers'\nfunds, and restrictions on banks' abilities to make high-risk trades.\nMr Obama said he was ready for a \"fight\" with the sector over the reforms, which came in the middle of the US bank reporting season\nrevealing bumper profits at many major groups.\nThe Tories were quick to back Mr Obama and accused the UK Government of becoming internationally \"isolated\" over the banking\noverhaul.\nHowever, Mr Darling today stood firm on his opposition to plans that would effectively split retail and investment banks.\n\"You could end up dividing institutions and making them separate legal entities, but that isn't the point,\" he told The Sunday Times.\n\"The point is the connectivity between them in relation to their financial transactions.\"\nHe stressed that failed US investment bank Lehman Brothers did not have retail deposits, but was allowed to go to the wall with disastrous\nconsequences for the global financial system.\nHe said: \"Equally the large-small thing doesn't run - Northern Rock was very small in global terms but systemically it was quite important\nwhen it got into trouble.\"\nThe UK will continue working with the US on banking overhaul plans, but the Chancellor said he would ensure proposals did not\n\"disadvantage London relative to the rest of the world\".\nBut the UK has so far gone out on a limb with its one-off 50% special tax on City bonuses over £25,000.\nThe move has already seen threats from banks to relocate affected staff abroad, while a number of foreign banks - including Credit Suisse\nand reportedly Goldman Sachs - are capping or reducing UK staff pay.\nUS Treasury officials are understood to be arriving in London tomorrow to brief the Government on Mr Obama's radical plans.\nAnd City minister Lord Myners is said to be gathering UK and international officials to discuss solutions to the \"too big to fail\" issue.\nSophie BengerlDigital Infrastructure Desk 1Department for Business, Innovation and Skills"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 24 2010 03:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: MONITORING PA - DARLING WARNS US OVER WAR ON WALL STREET", "body": "CONFIDENTIAL"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030406.txt_18737
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030406.txt
subject: Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/video/2240261 -het-hele-interview-met-steve-bannon.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2018, at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "This drives me f*ing crazy.\n\nSimple question for your boy: Did Donald Trump actively promote the theory that Barak Obama was not born\nin the US and was therefore not a legitimate President?\n\nAnswer: Yes.\n\nHe should not defend that shit. He can defend populist/nationalism all he wants, but when he bullies people\ndefending obvious Trump lies, he loses credibility."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "7/8/2018 9:51:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "agreed. ill pass it on :)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030493.txt_18742
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030493.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic <boris.nikolic@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030412.txt_18743
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030412.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wott <r"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31 2019 11:22 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/3556604/teen- sex-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-donald-trump-mara-lago-resort/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029143.txt_18747
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029143.txt
subject: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\n\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\n\nSkype -\n\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:35:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Pll call in 5"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031345.txt_18749
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031345.txt
subject: New York Attorney General Opens Investigation of Trump Projects - The New York Times
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/12/2019 12:55:51 PM", "subject": "New York Attorney General Opens Investigation of Trump Projects - The New York Times", "body": "This is the start of big problem for him!\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/11/nyregion/deutsche-bank-trump.html?emc=edit_NN_p_20190312&nlid=856913477&section=whatElse&te=1"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014525.txt_18750
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014525.txt
subject: The Year Ahead: A World of Change (Short Version Below For Convenience)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Morris, Paul V", "recipients": ["Morris, Paul V", "Lehane, Sean T"], "timestamp": "1/5/2017 3:31:54 PM", "subject": "The Year Ahead: A World of Change (Short Version Below For Convenience)", "body": "The Year Ahead: A World of Change\nA continued rise in equities. Renewed investor confidence. Bond markets under pressure. Our Chief Investment Office explores the risks and opportunities of these and other trends shaping the year ahead.\nAS WE LOOK BACK ON 2016, one could characterize it as The Year of The Unlikely. It began with deep worries regarding China's growth path, a second wave of collapsing oil prices, a Federal Reserve (Fed) hiking into deflationary headwinds, the impact of negative interest rates in Europe and Japan, concerns over a potential U.S. recession, lower-quality corporate high yield problems, and U.S. consumers who might never spend their savings at the pump. All these worries hit at once in January and February, prompting the S&P 500 to fall over 10% from its 2015 closing level of 2043. The year, at that point, appeared bleak.\nOur view was to maintain a balanced and diversified position throughout the downturn, particularly for the long haul, due to our belief that the major concerns, although understandable, were simply not going to fully develop and asset prices would begin to track fundamentals more effectively through the remainder of the year. The potential for risk assets to climb higher was there but a catalyst was needed. For our full view on the year ahead, please read our December 2016 Monthly Letter.\nExhibit 1: Mid-Cycle Slowdown Ended In Early 2016, When Oil and Dollar Stabilized)\n120 Spot 01 Price: West Texas Incernwdlate _.(6-Alowth Moving erage. Left Scale! e 60— . 40 _____ Rea Broad Trade-Weighted Eachawr Value of theuss 20 46-14ontre Moving Average Right SCale Illy0eSiouidown ..................................................................103 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Source: EINCME; FRB/Haver Anatytics. Data as of December 5, 2016. 96 92 88 84 Past performance is no guarantee offuture results.\nOur core belief was centered on healthy consumers who would indeed pick up their spending from savings at the pump and become more confident as job growth continued and real incomes increased. We also believed U.S. financial conditions and the economic backdrop would improve in the second half of the year as the pressure from the strong dollar subsided and the deflationary effects of the collapse in oil prices began to fade. In other words, we were witnessing evidence that the mid-cycle slowdown that had hurt economic growth and corporate earnings was ending. [See Exhibit 1] Based on this core belief, the \"grind it out\" year for risk assets would be back on track, the business cycle would extend into 2017, bond yields would slowly shift higher, and equity markets had the potential to head toward previous highs.\nA series of unexpected outcomes\nAt this point, we did not characterize 2016 as The Year of the Unlikely. However, if you consider specific events throughout the year in finance and sports, it is easy to see that now. We already mentioned the second plunge in oil prices to the mid-$20s per barrel to start the year, and bond markets in some areas of the world actually had negative yields—meaning the lender paid the entity issuing the bonds to take their money! This was unlikely. How about Brexit vote in Great Britain? Unlikely. In sports, Villanova University winning the national championship in men's college basketball (Nova's first championship since 1985), Leicester—the English football club—winning the Premier League (before this season began, British bookmakers listed them as a 5,000-to-1 shot to emerge as the champion), the Cleveland Cavaliers' first ever National Basketball Association championship and, of course, the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series for the first time since 1908! All unlikely. But they happened.\nLast but not least, in our own political backyard, we witnessed Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election last month. Also unlikely. We all know markets do not like uncertainty. However, sentiment can shift quickly if fundamentals are not negatively affected, and what was previously determined to be \"unlikely\" turns to enthusiasm as to what could be.\n\"We expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to head higher well into 2017, with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018, which should underpin equities for most of the year.\"\nCHRISTOPHER HYZY CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT\nWhy this expansion can continue\nBusiness cycles typically last between five and seven years before fundamentals deteriorate, usually due to a policy error of some sort. This can produce a recession and/or a bear market, which tend to correct the excesses that have been built up and kick-start a new cycle. Bull markets and cycles do not die of old age—there needs to be a fundamental catalyst that emerges and pushes the trends back the other way.\nWe are entering our ninth year in the current business cycle, despite all of the complexities and concerns that have come and gone since the financial crisis.. In fact, this cycle could have extended another few years along the same path, given the secular stagnation that prevailed. This era needed ultra-accommodative central bank monetary policy just to keep things stable and plodding along this far into the cycle. It also needed corporations willing to manage their earnings to the penny in a below trend growth world that offered little pricing power. And finally, this cycle needed U.S. and emerging market consumers to continue to switch from deleveraging to spending as their balance sheets and incomes improved.\nA return of \"animal spirits\"\nThis dynamic could have continued for a bit, but monetary policy has become tired. Negative interest rates have become a headwind, not a tailwind, in our view. And, just like sports fans, investors need a catalyst to break from the past. Visible positive catalysts tend to turn into improved sentiment and confidence. Through the years, economists have called this \"animal spirits.\"\nAnimal spirits begin as hope, turn into enthusiasm, and ultimately need visible action to keep the spirited momentum going. After all, economics is a behavioral science. It is our view that we are breaking from the era of secular stagnation and heading into fiscal reflation. This new era is likely to have its fits and starts and will not be in a straight line. It should also include different stages and speeds from various economic regions globally. Furthermore, it should contain some \"unlikely\" outcomes. With any cycle, we will have to take the good (higher nominal growth) with the potential bad (higher volatility) and investors will have to reposition portfolios, rebalancing when necessary, in order to take advantage of the new era.\nPrior to the U.S. presidential election, and even dating back to the summer months when bond yields bottomed, the economy was already beginning to improve. Corporate earnings were picking up, the consumer was spending at a healthy clip, there were some subtle signs of positive surprises in European economic activity, and the downturn in emerging markets (and negative earnings revisions) ceased. We were certainly not waving the celebratory flag on growth, but the economy was getting up off the ground, which is what risk assets, including equities, need sometimes. However, the S&P 500—a major benchmark for U.S. stocks--had lost momentum heading into the election, as investors worried that the secular stagnation era would continue and that monetary policy had lost its effectiveness.\nMarket sentiment changed dramatically during the early morning hours on November 9. The surprise victory by Donald Trump caught many investors off-guard. The potential for fiscal stimulus measures, reduced regulation, corporate tax reform and other potential pro-growth initiatives increased. Animal spirits perked up. Investor positioning was heavily skewed toward long-duration fixed income, low-volatility equities and high-dividend-paying companies. These areas significantly outperformed in the first half of the year but started to lose momentum once rates bottomed mid-year. However, investor positioning did not change materially at first. Portfolios were still generally overexposed to higher- quality, rate-sensitive investments—otherwise known as \"bond proxies.\"\nIn our Hills Have Eyes strategy report, published on November 16, we outlined the need to rebalance portfolios given our belief that we were already transitioning toward the late-cycle expansion phase and that the new enthusiasm for pro-growth policies would begin to accelerate investor flows toward more cyclical investments. Given the high degree of underexposure to late-cycle investments by investors, we believed such a rotation would cause a \"melt-up\" in equities toward new highs over time.\nDiversification and rebalancing will be key\nSo, how are we going to manage portfolios in a world undergoing a major market regime shift, one that is transitioning from the era of secular stagnation to fiscal reflation, and one that still has a considerable amount of uncertainty? We are going to become more prescriptive, remain diversified and balanced, but with more exposure to pro-growth, pro-cyclical areas. We will also likely rebalance more often throughout the year as investor rotation gathers momentum during 2017 and into 2018; and we look to periods of volatility as opportunities to add to areas we favor.\n\"Fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatility dampener in unforeseen worst-case scenarios.\"\nCHRISTOPHER HYZY CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT\nWe expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to head higher well into 2017, with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018, which should underpin equities for most of the year. Higher nominal growth, an improved picture for corporate profits and continued positive sentiment are the foundation for continued gains in the equity markets and an investor rotation from overexposure to long-dated fixed income into under owned equities.\nThis rotation will need a few periods of confirmation, given the still uncertain broader global macro outlook, but we expect price-to-earnings multiples to remain elevated, despite higher rates, throughout the year. S&P 500 earnings have a wide range of forecasts due to the potential for sizable tax cuts in 2017. Based on this, the S&P 500 could add extra earnings on top of normalized growth, which is expected to be around 9%. At present, a reasonable range, albeit a wide one, is considered to be between $129 and $138 with the potential for further upside. In this scenario, where we get pro-growth policies filtering into a higher earnings number, an S&P 500 bull case level of 2700 at the high end is possible.\nImproving profits and growth should take equities higher\nFor now, a base case utilizing the five factor framework from BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, which combines sentiment, valuation and technical, equates to 2300 for the S&P 500 at year end. The two components that include long-term valuation and 12-month price momentum are indicating that S&P 500 levels between the base and bull case are increasing in probability. Of course, there are a number of scenarios that could unfold that would indicate a wide range of outcomes depending on the multiple or earnings number that ultimately develops. In the end, it all comes down to the path of corporate profits and the visibility on growth, both of which are improving.\nHighlights We have moved from a \"get paid to wait\" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical- and value-oriented theme in multi-asset portfolios • Equities remain attractive versus fixed income on a relative basis. • Within equities. we favor U.S. large caps. U.S. small caps and emerging markets. • Within equities, we favor value over growth and more cyclical assets versus defensives. • Within fixed income. we prefer credit to Treasuries. We would also consider an allocation to Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS) where appropriate.\nPortfolio repositioning is likely to continue well into 2017, as developments unfold and the pro-cyclical environment gathers momentum. With growth already heading higher from Q3 2016 onward and earnings turning positive, investors have begun increasing cyclicality and exposure to value in portfolios at the expense of more defensive sectors and higher-dividend areas within equities. In addition, we expect a larger shift in emphasis toward small capitalization, which has already started, and more domestic-oriented equities due to a slightly stronger dollar, more pro-growth policies and the desire for a hedge against potential retaliatory trade policies from main trading partners. This portfolio shift in positioning is happening but, in our view, is in its early stages.\nWe have moved from a \"get paid to wait\" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical and value-oriented theme in multi-asset and all-equity portfolios primarily due to increased business and consumer confidence, which should lead to higher earnings than originally expected.\n• Therefore, we have raised our exposure to equities versus fixed income to a moderate overweight and our new tactical asset allocation view is overweight equities versus its strategic benchmark.\n• We are now further underweight fixed income versus equities, underweight versus its strategic benchmark rather than neutral, and have lowered cash to neutral from overweight.\nWithin the asset classes, we have made a number of changes consistent with our view from earlier this year and one that has accelerated post-election.\n• We are now moderately overweight U.S. small capitalization equities and neutral non-U.S. developed markets.\n• We maintain our preference for U.S. high-quality large caps and continue to overweight emerging markets.\n• We continue to favor value over growth and more cyclical areas (such as financials and consumer discretionary) versus defensives (such as utilities and consumer staples).\nIn fixed income, we have moved from a balanced view to a larger underweight versus the strategic benchmark.\n• However, fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatility dampener in unforeseen worst-case scenarios___and should be viewed primarily as a cash flow producer versus a total return asset, given the expectations for higher yields.\n• In addition, we have lowered Treasuries to a further underweight but maintain our neutral rating on high yield and underweight on international fixed income.\n• Municipal bonds have corrected to levels that are becoming attractive again, and we are still favorable on investment grade corporate credit.\n• We maintain our neutral rating on real estate and commodities, but we prefer metals and oil to gold.\nIn addition, the pro-cyclical improvement has started to break down the elevated correlation among and within asset classes since earlier in 2016. We expect this adjustment to continue in 2017 as economic volatility picks up and asset class volatility follows suit. Transitions to late-cycle phases tend to invite a higher level of volatility as inflation rises and central bank policies shift to nudging short rates higher.\nIn this environment, alternative investments, namely hedge funds, should outperform industry benchmarks, in contrast to recent underperformance. For investors able to withstand a higher allocation of illiquid assets in their portfolio, we prefer timberland for its long term-growth prospects and low correlation to financial assets."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031423.txt_18756
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031423.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayer"], "timestamp": "9/3/2009 11:18:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she is your second biggest fan... iam the first. 1 sell dubai, to its detractors."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem <Q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "An interesting piece to read before you start your weekend. Guest Post by Jim Krane: Dubai, Not Obama, is the Mideast's Best Peace Hope"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029625.txt_18758
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029625.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Grof a"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 08:44 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Posted 02 August 2010 - 12:47 AM\nJeffrey Epstein, Jew Billionaire Pedophile, Child Trafficker Goes Free..WoW! 20 year old Hearsay is enough to destroy catholic\n\npriest. What happened here to the justice system?\n\nConchita Sarnoff\nhttp://www.thedailyb...hile- goes-free/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032982.txt_18759
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032982.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "Im in paris until thurs? you?", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im in paris until thurs? you?"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland <_____________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is It possible for you to pass by Strasbourg, it would be great. I really need to understand more about Trump \nand what's going on in the American society."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 10:13:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, that should be possible. remind me how long is the fast train? otherwise ill fly. what days are good for \nyou"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033444.txt_18760
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033444.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors\nI've written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days.\nGoing to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad behavior.\nBest to stop obsessing."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD FORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out - this is what i want. . but actually, how it would work, and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are essential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call a time out, its on the field and done with dignity, you cant retreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. in the next quarter she will appreciate whatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might want to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. . its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 9:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm.\nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "coming from you -- not mutually exclusive"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "?.."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "you can be both thoughtful and face to face"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "That is true.\nInteresting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "last i looked ( sic), you do not have ovaries."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 6:16:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "I hear you."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030374.txt_18761
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030374.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430906-senate-investigators-want-to-question-russia-based-businessman-tied-to-trump"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 4:12:19 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Very interesting.\n\nHow are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026018.txt_18766
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026018.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/12/2016 9:23:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry in the conference room listening to the Portuguese prime minister .... \nNthg revolutionary really. \nWas watching tv last night - either Trump is a misunderstood genius or it s going to be complicated ... \nAriane de Rothschild"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Nov 2016, at 09:35", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cam you speak now?"}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:29", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I see who you re talking about. Brilliant , but I was told his wife didn t want to move from London esp not \nGeneva. Do you mind asking him ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11 Nov 2016, at 22:48", "subject": "Re:", "body": "met a really intersting banker for you to meet, former cfo deutsch bank, former cfo bmw german, born \nin south america."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511.txt_18771
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511.txt
subject: poetry and science
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2014 6:29:16 PM", "subject": "poetry and science", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nApropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was \ninterested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV \non a broad range of topics. \n500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin \nimmediately, Jan 1.. I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a \nsession on metaphor at the edges of fields. \nINote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology, \nzoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David \nMalan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post \nproduction. \nI am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics \nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt_18777
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt
subject: Re: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:57 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": "ne Privileged “Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033265.txt_18780
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033265.txt
subject: To your point | guess...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2018 4:38:00 PM", "subject": "To your point | guess...", "body": "The story is out there -- but people have not directly linked it to Trump I guess...\n\nhttps://quartzy.qz.com/1155494/theres-never-been-a-better-time-to-buy-a-50-million-nyc-dream-\npad/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026245.txt_18792
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026245.txt
subject: Fwd: Keep the March Alive!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Diane Ziman PO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2018 9:59:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "Jeffrey --\n\nDid you see my son’s email on Sunday?\n\nI was so proud to see him speak at the Women’s March this weekend, joining thousands of passionate Floridians who want real change in our state, and across the country.\n\nBut we both know that change doesn’t come easy. And there are a lot of folks in Tallahassee that want to keep things the same as usual.\n\nWe can’t afford the status quo so they can have their way. We need leadership that will bring the change that so many have been marching for over the past year.\n\nCan I count on you to help my son bring that change to Tallahassee?\n\nClick here to join his campaign today, and help him do the right thing for our neighbors across the state.\n\n#ThatsMyBoy\n\n- Diane"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033271.txt_18801
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033271.txt
subject:
  Dershowitz: There's No Obstruction, President 'Has Constitutional Authority to Do What Trump Is Alleged to Have Done'

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2018 2:30:10 AM", "subject": "Dershowitz: There's No Obstruction, President 'Has Constitutional Authority to Do What Trump Is Alleged to Have Done'", "body": "https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/dershowitz-theres-no-obstruction-president-has-constitutional-authority-do"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt_18802
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt
subject: Re: Larry Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nI work for Larry Summers and as you may have heard, we are stranded in St. Thomas and the airlines are saying we can't get out until Thursday. \nOur names: \nKelly Friendly \nAndrew Friendly \nMy cell is below or you can reach my husband Andrew Friendly on his cell at ______________You may have met him when he was President Clinton's aide. \nWe would be so grateful for any help you could provide. \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "my friend andrew farkas has a pretty full plane to ny tomorrwo but can take 1 or 2 of you. i can call other hotels wher we have pull.. my cars and drivers are at your disposal."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Fantastic. If possible, could my daughter (age 11) and I go back with Mr. Farkas? \nPlease let me know how best to follow up. We may have found a condo by red hook but haven't found a car yet. \nLet me know how to follow up. \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jcffrey Epstein <jccvacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "andrew farkas is flying tomorrow. please contact him directly and as soon as you are ready i will organize the use of my car."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Excellent. I will email him now. \nIf it's not too much of an inconvenience we would love to use the car. Is it available around 3? We are staying by the airport.... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.eom>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine, please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful.... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.eom>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much. \nWe are so grateful for your generosity... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 02:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. and I flew home today with Mr. Farkas and his family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. Andrew and are still stuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car. \nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us. \nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard. \nFondly, \nKelly Friendly"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026618.txt_18803
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026618.txt
subject: Fwd: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [Jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 3:31:35 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself", "body": "Hi Jeff\nSubject: Bill Clinton on Virtues of North Korean Nuclear Deal - History Repeats Itself\nFyi\n\nBest\nEB\n\nCheck out this video on YouTube:\n\nhttp://youtu.be/6TcbUS5jAavw"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt_18806
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt
subject: RE: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Ive had enough!!!! Which puts ???"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:13:06 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. | still think that is the best idea. The stock is now\ndown 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So | think it\nmakes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from\n\nmanagement."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032609.txt_18816
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032609.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "rr otc", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "rr otc", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at §:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes happy to do in person"}, {"sender": "ii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie?\nI'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 3:30:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Scheduled. Would you have 30 min - 1 h before/after. Will tell you some more ideas about your interviews and science support"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033517.txt_18820
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033517.txt
subject: Reminder: AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians’ future?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/13/2019 12:46:24 PM", "subject": "Reminder: AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians’ future?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030646.txt_18840
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030646.txt
subject: Question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/19/2016 4:54:50 PM", "subject": "Question", "body": "I'm not sure it's safe long term or a good option to live in the us for a Trump/Pence presidency with \nBannon as a key advisor. \nAm I wrong? The hate, anti-semitism (swastikas painted all over the park a few blocks from me), and \n\"His\" desire to be Putin.... All super concerning. \nxx \nco-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026024.txt_18842
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026024.txt
subject: Ref. : TR:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jean HUGUEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 11:36:54 AM", "subject": "Ref. : TR: ", "body": "Dear jeffrey \nFrom our side we could postponed the trip ,visit the 2 works from Plant Thursday the 15th and have our \nmeeting Friday the 16th all of us,but need an answer from Plant. \nPlease tell me if it is convenient for you Friday the 16th,or Thurday late afternoon \nThanks \njean"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jean.huguen@albertopinto.com", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "lundi 28 novembre 2016 01:23", "subject": "TR: ", "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt_18846
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt
subject: Fwd: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence M. Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 8:09:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "September 10, 2015 at 12:01:39 PM MST", "subject": "RE: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Then we’re in complete agreement.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence M. Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I couldn't agree more. Re ridicule. I never suggest ridiculing people. However by pointing out the inconsistency,\nor contravening evidence associated with various ideas, including for example American exceptionalism, then\nwe are essentially subjecting ideas to ridicule. That is what I meant."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026630.txt_18850
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026630.txt
subject: Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, Al system finds
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2016 12:34:36 PM", "subject": "Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, Al system finds", "body": "http://www.cnbe.com/2016/10/28/donald-trump-will-win-the-election-and-is-more-popular-than-obama-in-2008-ai-system-finds. html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026624.txt_18856
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026624.txt
subject: Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness | Law News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 1, 2016 at 4:40:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness | Law News", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/trump-team-fires-back-after-jane-doe-refiles-rape-lawsuit-with-new-witness/\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030652.txt_18871
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030652.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "War between the Jews and the non Jews. Jews presently winning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yup , tillerdon unhsppy with Jared in Iraq. Pence given health bill . Kelly conway in trouble. All fun barrack gone dark"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/5/2017 5:00:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I got a message from Barrack--he's in LA."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026030.txt_18872
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026030.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747  \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, lye set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to go to him. if he is shy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is not so much shy, as paranoid. I have to contact him through his wife on a burner phone, which they don't reliably check. But have queried."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 1:19:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They came back to New York yesterday. He would like to meet, tho wary of being seen, etc. I will work it out."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032635.txt_18879
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032635.txt
subject: Re: did you see barrack interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Oct 15, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re: did you see barrack interview", "body": "“Tn the last 10 months, we have followed through on one promise after another,” Mr. Trump told the Values\nVoter Summit in Washington. “I didn’t have a schedule. But if I did have a schedule, I would say we are\nsubstantially ahead of schedule.”"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2017 11:45:57 AM", "subject": "Re: did you see barrack interview", "body": "Yes\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023350.txt_18881
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023350.txt
subject: another flowery email.
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinclla TT i"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:56 PM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "know a simple answer. and today after asking at least every week since then donot have an answer. I have\nbeen trying not to add stress to your day. i try to explain things and take the time to do so gently, ( not my forte\n. this is one question out of hundreds. the fact that a 21 year old was in the office only xeroxing for a\n\nmonth, was obvious to everyone in the office. having a 26 year old xeroxing instead doesnt move us\n\nforward, answers first. copying old files. can wait."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "Iam sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have\nbeen more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangment between\nus, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our\nfriendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling\nat me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am trying my best to be understanding . sorry\n\n. From the outset and as you told me you recall. 1 tsuggested that three years should be the period of\nengagment. as planning is not a one year excericse . you declined to commit to a number of alternatives\npresented to you for payment of the third year. I told you in nov that you should decide whether to now sign\non for that very third year as the vast majority of my work ended on oct 15. you recently told me you thought i\nwas kidding. .you hired brad patting him on the back that after months of inquiry he can now, finallly tell you\nwhich Ile owns the cars??\n\nonce he has all the facts what next ??._ whether or not you refer to a portion of the third year as after care, or\nwhatever term besides 'scoundrel you choose to use, I m not sure why you assume now it should be free.(\n\nI HATE THIS CONVERSATION < HATE, ) andi heard you when you said you told me what was | work\nstill to be done you thought valuable enough to pay for. please tell me . and then we can decide the next steps\n»», 1f any. I consider my work rarefied art. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder . IT reminds me of\nthose people looking at a modern art piece and saying \" my child could do that\". hope you are feeling better."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "ada and brad are respondbile for the loan ,. docs, ata minimum, leon he hasn't read the financial\n\nstatements SINCE DEC. !!. impossible ,had he done so the silly numbers jump off the page . ( sent in another\nemail ). itis a financial office., 190 million sitting unused in CASH , budget and planning person for what , its\nnot a publice co. ? townhouse construciton , household operations, boat, plane, taxes, we went through this\nwith the cash flow. you and iknow approx how much each will cost. its a week job nota fulll time\n\none- ada has no lien copies. none. ?! impossible not to know , ask, quesiton? two senior accountants CPA\ns. not the 75k girl that they hired, . IT professional backed by a firm. high quality,can we tap apollo\nresources? new lawyer , heather level . new receptionist, and bookeeper. get rid of ava. next could be new\noffice ,znew furniture , , the whole place reeks of cheap. ITIS MAY<_ [have not been asked to interview one\nperson to date. notone. having cpas in there tomrrow woudl go along way. 1 dont understand the time\nline, coo first. ? in by july?? cpas in by sept. tax return due oct 15. ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:36 PM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "I know that both you and I heard brads’. im out of here if i dont get a coo. . sorry,. i know that neither of us\nhave stood in the way of his finding/ gettting one.. JPM account DB account GS account, ??? its MAY\n\n1. nothing in the first quarter and these are only papers that need signing.\n\nI suggest your thinking on my role and compensation for my work might benefit , from a mental shift - think\nmark and josh, without the mutual resentment (HAHA) only in terms of sharing ,thanks, Iam and have been\nyour financial partner 1.. rectifying circumstances that appear in hind sight unexplainable. I wish you woudl\nhave asked me earllier to review your things , but i understand. I do know that soley as a result of my actions"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt_18886
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 12:29:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No. what happened? R u about to be dragged in?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump roles out clintons four accusers. recall our dinner?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030861.txt_18889
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030861.txt
subject: FW: EOD Commodities Note - 31 Mar
messages:
  [{"sender": "Prateek Jain", "recipients": ["Ariane Dwyer"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31, 2015 4:06 PM", "subject": "EOD Commodities Note - 31 Mar", "body": "OIL \nAll eyes on Iran talks today which were extended by a day into Wednesday. Earlier in the day, a US official suggested \nthat negotiation may continue another day past deadline if 'it's useful to do so'. Another Russian official commented \nthat a deal was 'closer and closer'. This optimism about an agreement, at least on some points, weighed heavily on oil \ntoday with Brent dropping 2.5%. In my opinion, even if the talks end positively with agreement on key points, the deal \nhas been softened enough compared to what was originally sought by President Obama, and is going to face a tough \nchallenge being approved by a skeptical Congress, which is in fact proposing to impose new sanctions on Iran. \nNigeria's elections ended today easing the political tension, with the ex-military ruler Buhari's winning against the \nincumbent President. In short term, this eased any immediate violence concerns in the country, but this shift in power \ncan lead to the movement of the Boko Haram violence to southern oil producing region of Nigeria and any \ndevelopments there need to be carefully watched. In other news, Yemen rebels seized military base at Bab el-Mandeb, \noverlooking the key shipping route while Saudi-led coalition kept bombing Houthi occupied sites.. \nVols were stronger with wings being bought aggressively today as oil can move quickly away from current levels \ndepending on Iran deal outcome.. overall vols gained about 1% across the curve \nWTI (/change) \tBRE (/change) \nK15 \t52.50% +1.45% \t51.10% +1.05% \nM15 \t51.20% +2.10% \t47.90% +0.90% \nZ15 \t37.10% +1.00% \t35.15% +0.70% \nZ16 \t26.20% +0.10% \t26.40% +0.55% \nMetals \n3m Ivls \tdod change \tsupport \tresistance \nAl $1785 \t-$12.5 \t$1750 \t$1800 \nCu $6041 \t-$41 \t$6000 \t$6300 \nZn $2081 \t-$28 \t$2000 \t$2100 \nNi $12,395 \t-$485 \t$12,000 \t$13,000 \nPb $1820 \t-$5 \t$1800 \t$1900 \nThe base complex traded down in the morning then picked up on improving customer confidence only to crash off again \nat close. China has reduced the deposits required from home buyers for the second time in 6 months in an attempt to \nboost sliding house prices, which should have knock on effects in the copper and nickel markets. Nickel continues its \nslide as CTA funds have sold off heavily on the supply crunch failing to materialize and demand from the stainless steel \nmarket evaporating. Nickel ore supplies are also returning from the Philippines as the rainy season ends, adding further \nsupply pressure. Chinese NPI producers are cutting production, selling stocks or attempting to secure loans on the back \nof stocks in warehouses. Rio Tinto have resolved the their tax dispute with the Mongolian government over the Oyu \nTolgoi copper mine but financing still needs to be negotiated over phase ll of the development there. Zambia's Mining \nand finance ministers have indicated that they may consider temporarily reverting to the old tax regime or making deals \non a mine by mine basis as the IMF applaud their efforts to compromise and encouraged them to implement a \ntransparent system that applies to all mines. Vietnam is expected to increase its aluminia output by 20% to \n650kMT/year as its first plant reaches full capacity this month. \nShanghai Aluminum on warrant stocks are flat at 108.1 kMT. LME Aluminum on warrant stocks are flat at 1888 \nkMT Shanghai Copper on warrant stocks are flat at 86.7 kMT. LME Copper stocks are up 0.11% to 252 kMT. LME Nickel \nstocks are up 0.41% to 332 kMT. \nCopper Vols are down 0.5%, Ali Vols are down 0.25%, Nickel Vols are up 1%, Lead Vols are unch Zinc Vols are unch \nUpcoming Data \n30/3-Chicago PMI-Sury 51.7%, Actual 46.3%, Prior 45.8% \n30/3-US Consumer Confidence Index -Sury 96.4, Actual 101.3, Prior 96.4"}, {"sender": "Daniel Sabba", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2015 8:06:56 PM", "subject": "FW: EOD Commodities Note - 31 Mar", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033108.txt_18894
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033108.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you have 5 minutes today? You could actually help me on something I think...(mizrahi bank wants to hire me)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 3:35:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026286.txt_18897
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026286.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Grossman, Andrew M"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032570.txt_18901
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032570.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 4:27:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030503.txt_18914
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030503.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic <i>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic <r>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Also nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017574.txt_18921
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017574.txt
subject: Fwd: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Auren Hoffman", "recipients": ["Fouad", "Lisa"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:58 -0800", "subject": "Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Dear Fouad,\nDear Lisa,\n\nYou are invited to join us at Dialog 2014 -- a two-day bipartisan retreat discussing how to change the world.\n\nThere will be no speeches just many moderated break-out discussions of 6-15 people on various topics. And we design the agenda around your ideas and needs.\n\nPlease let us know if you would like to join us,\n/- Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman/\n\np.s. and yes, we know Dialog 2014 is 16 months away, but we are giving you a chance to sign up now\n\n*DETAILS*:\nYou are invited to join us at the Dialog Retreat ... 150 people to change the world ... a participatory and entrepreneurial conversation on changing the world.\n\nThe *Dialog* participants are not modest. We want to change the world. But we do not want to spend our time being in a large audience listening to winded speeches. There are no speakers. No panels. All attendees participate in break-out facilitated discussions. And we *limit the discussion to only 150 global leaders* who can have an impact now and emerging leaders who can help implement the plans we develop.\n\n*Dates*: March 13-15, 2014\n*Location:* Sundance Resort, Utah (40 minutes from the Salt Lake City airport)\n/We've rented out the entire resort/\n\nRegister at:\nhttp://dialog2014.eventbrite.com\npassword: dialog2014\n\nYou qualify for a significant discount on the retreat fee. On the registration page, click on the link that says 'Enter promotional code and enter:\n*AcademicDialog*\n\n/note: the invite is only for Lisa Randall and is not transferable as we are limited to only 150 participants. There are no sponsors. We increase the retreat fee weekly to reward the people that sign up early. And this retreat is 100% off-the-record. /\n\nWe hope you can join us."}, {"sender": "Lisa Randall", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2012 4:17:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Is this worthwhile?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt_18922
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 10:21:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They’re huge!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 6:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great photos"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, 10 October 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Either one I guess. Just came back from Ireland where I have a show called \"Torture.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032564.txt_18923
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032564.txt
subject: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump's Proposed "Anti-Science" Budget Cuts I HuffPost
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 10:38:21 PM", "subject": "Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump's Proposed \"Anti-Science\" Budget Cuts I HuffPost", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt_18925
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Rucmm|r il", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did you enjoy sultan?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "btw. michael wolff is doing a trump book. spent 45 minutes on the phone with him over the weekend he asked if he could ask you some off the record questions re policy procedures , noramlly followed etc."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:28:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, of course."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032812.txt_18931
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032812.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Kraus", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2018 5:43:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Kafka"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2018, at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The Guardian has learned that Rubenfeld is currently the subject of an internal investigation at Yale. The investigation is focused on Rubenfeld’s conduct, particularly with female law students. Students have also raised related concerns to Yale authorities about Chua’s powerful influence in the clerkships process. The investigation was initiated before Kavanaugh was nominated by Donald Trump to serve on the high court.\n\nRubenfeld said in a statement to the Guardian: “In June, Yale University informed me that it would conduct what it terms an ‘informal review’ of certain allegations, but that to preserve anonymity, I was not entitled to know any specifics. As a result, I do not know what I am alleged to have said or done. I was further advised that the allegations were not of the kind that would jeopardize my position as a long-tenured member of the faculty."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031153.txt_18938
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031153.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 08, 2011 04:51 PM", "subject": null, "body": "In taking his case to Washington, Mr. Aliyev has variously sought safe passage to the United States, help in recovering $2 billion that relatives claimed they lost from seized businesses, or at least the satisfaction of embarrassing Mr. Nazarbayev. For his part, the Kazakh leader wants to make sure that the Americans stay out of the dispute, and not allow it to affect their alliance with his government.\n\nThe Obama administration has done just that. Through comments in secret diplomatic cables, the former ambassador to Kazakhstan made clear his wariness of being drawn in.\n\n“Both sides — the government and Aliyev — seek to manipulate us to their own advantage,” Richard E. Hoagland, who ended his term as United States ambassador early this year, wrote in February 2009 in one of more than a dozen State Department cables obtained by the antisecrecy group WikiLeaks that mentioned the dispute. [*]\n\nMr. Nazarbayev, 70, [*]a former steel worker and Soviet-era Communist Party leader, has been in power for two decades, presiding over Central Asia’s most vibrant economy. Human rights activists, however, have long accused him of persecuting dissidents and political opponents.\n\nMr. Aliyev, 48, [*]has served as chief of the tax police, deputy foreign affairs minister and head of the Kazakh equivalent of the K.G.B. But critics say he used his clout to secretly take over private companies for financial gain, often by threatening violence.\n\nNow hiding somewhere in Europe, he has been convicted back home on what he claims are trumped-up criminal charges, including a coup attempt. His wife divorced him in June 2007, and the Kazakh government has taken businesses owned by him and members of his extended family. [*]\n\nNo longer powerful at home, Mr. Aliyev turned to Washington, knowing that his former father-in-law cared greatly about his reputation there. Early in 2008 he hired RJI Government Stra 5, a sroup whose consultants included Tanya Rahall, sister of Representative Nick J. ul m4 a : West reemve Democrat; and a friend of Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California. Both congressmen were booked on a trip to Kazakhstan\n\nto discuss energy policy with Mr. Nazarbayev. Before their departure, members 0 A urge him to express strong concerns about the\n\nharm done to a relative of Mr. Aliyev named Devincci Hourani, whose oil-company assets in Kazakhstan were seized, according to a letter to Mr. Issa from RJI.\n\nMr. Issa, who had developed a rapport with the Kazakh president on an earlier visit, nonetheless agreed to take up the plight of Mr. Hourani. Though he stepped into the fight, he still maintained a close connection to the president, nominating him that summer for the Nobel Prize, a move that drew ridicule from human rights activists. aces right, of Vista, CA] [*]\n\nNY vorked ¢ of sv and later for Mr. Hourani through 2010, contacting the offices of at least +0 dozen members af Congress. They included Representative Howard L. Berman, Democrat of California, then chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, whose office said he discussed the dispute with the State Department.\n\nMs. Rahall also pursued a second strategy. “The alternative is to embarrass the existing regime,” she wrote in a July 2008 e-mail to her boss.\n\nShe pressed House members to criticize the Kazakh government’s human rights record. At her request, at least five statements were published in the Congressional Record, one citing Mr. Aliyev as a victim of his government. Separately, Mr. Aliyev offered to provide the Justice Department with documents that he claimed could prove that his former father-in-law accepted bribes from a businessman representing American oil companies that were seeking drilling rights in Kazakhstan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022927.txt_18942
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022927.txt
subject: FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Hill, James E. TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 4/22/15", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt_18945
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt
subject:
  Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)

messages:
  [{"sender": "Moshe Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM", "subject": "Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "Hi Jeff,\nThanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman\nand Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out\nof it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.\nMartin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of\nsome of my own and pass them on to you.\nIn case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's\nwork, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are\ninterested.\n-Moshe\n1) Where do our moral and political views come from?\nThe bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through\nreason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does\ndrive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of\ncommission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery\nhas been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?\nAnd across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?\nMore generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all\nmen are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by\nan amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do\nthe bidding of their cynical designers?\n2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?\nSome tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.\nAnd maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many\naspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these\nthings? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in\nwhat we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally\nspecific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its\ninfluence?\n3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar\nstructure they have?\nWe have one vote per person, but everyone knows dollars can buy more votes, and voters in small states are\nbetter represented than those in large states. Whose interests are being served and why theirs? Many economists\nand political scientists have thought about \"optimal institutions.\" And much comparative and historical work\nhas been done. But there isn't really a good unified theory of how these evolve, what characteristics are likely to\nemerge, and in what ways they are or are not optimal.\n4) Is there a fundamental theory of human societies that's analogous to Darwin's theory in biology?\nCan that framework be as well supported by evidence and as simple as natural selection in biology, that will\nlikewise explain the interesting things humans do, like, and believe, and the institutions we construct?\nEvolutionary psychologists think this doesn't require a new theory, just an investigation of the mind that\nbiologically evolved on the Savannah. Others like Dawkins have suggested that we are best understood as\nmachines infested by viruses of the mind which themselves evolve to take advantage of our evolved\npsychology. Anthropologists treat culture as just random inputs. Social psychologists document the funny\nquirks of our behavior without explaining where they come from. And economists assume people optimize\ngiven their tastes and beliefs but take those as given. Is one of these the right theory, if not is there a more\ncompelling theory out there? What will it look like? How will we find it? How will we know we have found it,\nwhen we have?\n5) How can we fix the perverse incentives in academia?\nResearchers get hired and promoted for publishing in top journals. Journal publication is determined by editors\nand referees. The best way to publish is to make sure your allies are the referees, cite their work, and don't step\non their toes, and to convince the editor you are famous enough and your work is flashy enough that it will be\nwell cited and get covered by the nytimes. None of this requires much attention be paid to truth, insight, or\noriginally.\nArguably, this is why the social sciences are such a mess. Few bother to incorporate evidence or arguments\nfrom outsiders (e.g., social psychologists don't consult historians, economists barely consult social\npsychologists). Few bother to question the fundamental assumptions driving their field that make no sense and\ngo unchecked (e.g., anthropologists treat culture as random inputs). And many researchers end up spending\ntheir whole careers developing and propagating theories that are completely uninteresting to outsiders, or\nobviously fallacious to anyone not steeped in their literature.\nIt is ridiculous that we're still using a system derived from the Society of Letters of the 1500s. Perhaps it's time\nfor something more like Wikipedia, where information gets aggregated and contributors are incentivizes by\ntheir reputation as competent editors to integrate information from across disciplines? Or something like Reddit,\nwhere quality research is recognized by upvotes that aggregate the opinion of thousands from diverse fields? Or\na certification system of sorts, where papers are certified as having done their statistics right or having\nintegrated what's known from certain fields, or not citing irrelevant papers for political reasons? Whatever the\nsolution is, social scientists and engineers who work on this problem will have orders of magnitude more impact\non science than scientists doing primary research in our archaic system."}]


