# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt_22261
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt
subject: Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 2:38:55 PM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak", "body": "this is your interview not his"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\n\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022258.txt_22264
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022258.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "BE", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you understand offset agreements? I got asked to be involved in negotiating some of the deals between Brazil and other countries in regards to the purchase of new fighter jets.\n\nWhat is an offset service provider?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes , one of the most complex negotiations they re very strange. Someone buys fighters but with the fighter money , some must be used for specific third party items. I will buy your pussy for 10k, but with 2 of the 10 you have to buy me food. And to make matter worse I need to borrow the 10 from you."}, {"sender": "Nadia <>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hmm, so the offset service provider does what - negotiation between the parties? Complex sounds interesting..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ae"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brazil , has tried to buy fighters, in the past, they don't have a lot of money,"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes but with a 2.2 billion dollar top. most planes are above 100 each, hence the issue\n\nApparently Brazil is a hot investment place now (7?) It is more about the offset part than the jet deal. France, Sweden and USA are all lobbying to get the jet deal as aviation is tied into potentially big tourism deals. (36 planes)\n| was just on a call with a guy in Sweden who is dealing with this...\n| never know if the stories are real, but he claims to work with the Brazilian president, Obama, Warren Buffet etc.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt_22265
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TO ROGER STONE CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE DS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO OK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!! STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM. WIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!! STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM!!!!", "body": "Thanks, Regards, Darren"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Aug 16, 2016, at 10:42 PM", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren: Best, Charles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM!!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Best, Charles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:45 AM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:47:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025885.txt_22269
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025885.txt
subject: Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little st James island
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cathy Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little st James island", "body": "Dear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023717.txt_22273
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023717.txt
subject:
  EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 3:34:18 PM", "subject": "Re: EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:32 AM", "subject": "The latest thinking from London hedge fund crowd", "body": "The latest thinking from London hedge fund crowd"}, {"sender": "Ozan Tarman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:40 AM", "subject": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because....", "body": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because Hillary bets worked as Trump trades. Wider, steeper core rates, stronger USD, weaker EM is the Rage. The last one, EM, is the big loser out of Trump Reflation Theme. DM over EM and divergence within DM are very much in vogue. All gains of EMBI since March are gone! For Rates & FX, it does feel like early days of Taper Tantrum trade of 3 years ago. Both dominated by US price action. In both, hedge funds have now caught the moves, play offense & ride the Trump narrative. Real Money is on the ropes, caught long Fixed Income/duration/carry and cannot play defense fearing Outflows. In Emerging Markets, most outflows are retail, ETF driven. All eyes on next leg of institutions. In equities, banks big winners; FANGs losing. I asked partners 2 questions. 1) Would the \"this will be great for business, feel good factor\" wave out-run \"if real yields go up, equities are a sell\" fear. Clients are torn, but the former, bullish camp wins for now, my colleagues suggest. There are skeptics though. 2) In Europe, do fears over Renzi losing & Le Pen winning climb over the big momentum behind banks etc. Again, my equity team suggests, \"no, reflation wave may win over Italy referendum anxiety„ for now.\" Renzi is now widely expected to lose, so a \"yes\" would be the big surprise trade. And the bigger elephant in the room is Le Pen. If she wins in May, Europe as we know it may really shake.. But for now this is more in the radars of Euro & EBG traders. Core rates are driven by the speed of TY sell-off. And in G5 FX, the big driver is USD/JPY. The stronger \"we should believe in Trump reflation narrative\" winds are, the more USD/JPY buyers we see. Some in Research warn that Trump may succeed in \"tax cuts, faster than any infrastructure spending,\" but few macro are in mood to listen. A few players believe, looking at trade weights of each with US and magnitude of sell-off, Asia FX may have more weakness to come than MXN. Will copper/infrastructure rally eventually help Chile? Most macro love NKY, willing to love it more. Bringing it home; fast macro money players are rushing to erase losses, year long pains through wider rates, longer USD, weaker EM, stronger equities. Real Money is in defensive, remembering Taper Tantrum days, fearing institutional outflows & forced selling of carry hope positions. Those who want to \"fade\" Trump rally, seek valuation in EM, believe core rates can tighten to get a breather are in Minority."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt_22274
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt
subject: Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 6:30:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note:\n\n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth.\n\nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President.\n\nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Eee = be is cahriman of bubai world ports. african ports anew focus _ he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today?\nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you?\n\nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt_22282
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "anasalrasheed [anasalrasheed@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ugly .. very ugly"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "smells like something bigger to me. I wouldnt be surprised if MBZ set him up."}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mmmmmm"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thoughts?"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed [anasalrasheed@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:46:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dificult to tell as of today.. leaks are done in a very smart way and .. fast.. very fast. No question Qatar scoring big. It is a media war now.\n\nI think saudis are loosing Trump if they dont start defending. Best defense is the truth even if ugly, in my opinion.\n\nTurkey is having fun, the saudis need to act. This will not go away. And, yes, Canada wins"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019312.txt_22297
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019312.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 15:38", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw: Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels", "body": "Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between\nright-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who\nwas Donald Trump's right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist\nviolence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast\nhimself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (II Movimento), right in the heart of\nEurope and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the\nEuropean elections which will be held in spring 2019.\n\n[...article continues...]\n\nIn Sacratissimo Corde Iesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 12:19:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030958.txt_22298
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030958.txt
subject: Re: Alex Acosta update I Power Line
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Grusky", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "December 6, 2018 at 3:52:15 PM EST", "subject": "Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php\n\nAlex Acosta update\nEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out of a lawsuit that would\nhave given some of his victims the opportunity to testify about his predatory and criminal\nconduct. Victims never got that opportunity when Epstein faced criminal charges, because\nAlex Acosta---then the lead prosecutor, now the Secretary of Labor---let Epstein off with\na ridiculously lenient sentence. Despite having committed hideous sex offenses with dozens\nof minors, Epstein received a sentence of 13 months in jail, during which he was often free\nduring the day.\n\nEpstein's decision to buy his out of the civil lawsuit, one that he had the nerve to initiate,\nbenefits Acosta. The trial would have provided non-stop headlines, coupled with frequent\nreferences to the sweetheart deal Acosta gave him. As Randy Schultz puts it, the trial would\nhave been the occasion for a long overdue public shaming of Acosta. Now, he avoids this\nconsequence.\n\nBut this doesn't mean Acosta is out of the woods. He faces calls for his ouster from the\nTrump cabinet.\n\nSome calls are from the usual suspects. Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times has\nwritten a piece so obnoxious that it almost makes me want to see Acosta ride out the storm.\nBut some conservatives are also advocating Acosta's departure. Concerned Women for\nAmerica is a stalwart conservative organization. It describes itself, accurately, as \"focus[ed]\non seven core issues: the family, the sanctity of human life, religious liberty, education,\nsexual exploitation, national sovereignty, and support for Israel.\" (Emphasis added)\nIts leader, Penny Nance, has called for Acosta's resignation. Noting that labor trafficking,\nwhich the Labor Department combats, is often conjoined with sex trafficking, Nance says\nthat President Trump would not have nominated Acosta if reports fully describing Acosta's\nconduct in the Epstein case had emerged earlier.\n\nSen. Ben Sasse has also weighed in. He sent a letter to the Justice Department asking it to\ninvestigate its treatment of Epstein, including the fact that the plea deal ensured that victims\nof the pervert would be denied the ability to comment on or object to the leniency of his\nsentence. Sasse is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Oversight,\nAgency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts.\n\nSen. Marco Rubio, a longtime supporter of Acosta, says it would be \"very troubling\" if\npolitical influence led to a light sentence for Epstein. In Rubio's view, and that of every\nrational person, Epstein \"should have been in jail for a long time.\" Rubio added, however,\nthat he will reserve judgment until he hears Acosta's side.\n\nThat's fair. But so far, Acosta has provided no real defense for letting Epstein off so lightly.\nIn public, at least, he is standing by his argument that the deal was a reasonable one and that\nthis is old news.\n\nPreviously, Acosta had a different defense. He cited \"a year-long assault on the prosecution\nand the prosecutors\" by \"an army of legal superstars\" who represented Epstein. This\nallegedly included \"defense counsel investigat[ing] individual prosecutors and their\nfamilies, looking for personal peccadilloes that may provide a basis for disqualification.\" In\nthis account, the deal was made to relieve the pressure, while still getting a conviction.\n\nAcosta could hardly assert this explanation----i.e., that he wimped out---while seeking a\ncabinet position with the expectation of being appointed to more exalted jobs in the future.\nNor is the explanation particularly plausible. Acosta isn't the first prosecutor to face a\nscorched earth defense. Ask Ken Starr about this.\n\nI don't doubt that Acosta regarded escaping the wrath of the defense team as a benefit of\nreaching the plea deal. But I don't believe this was incentive enough to cause him, in effect,\nto throw the case.\n\nWhat was the true incentive? As I wrote when this story broke, I think it was the same\nincentive that explains much of his conduct in public life---Acosta's desire to\naccommodate people he thinks can help him down the road.\n\nWhich people? Probably the lawyers at Kirkland and Ellis, where Acosta had once worked.\nEpstein enlisted Ken Starr* and Jay Lefkowitz, both of Kirkland, for his defense team.\nAcosta reportedly worked out the terms of his surrender with Lefkowitz, a former\ncolleague, at a meeting in a location far away from the prosecutor's office.\n\nThe location of the meeting is itself suspicious. Prosecutors and other law enforcement\nofficials normally demand that those seeking a deal come to them.\n\nThe fact that Acosta didn't is another sign---if one were needed---that this was a\ncapitulation. It also casts further doubt on the claim that Acosta was capitulating for the\npurpose of sparing the folks who worked with him in the prosecutor's office.\n\nThe key point, though, is that Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz were power players in\nWashington---men who might help Acosta down the road.\n\nReaders will be quite familiar with Starr's background. Lefkowitz was director of cabinet\naffairs and deputy executive secretary to the domestic policy council under President\nGeorge H.W. Bush. Under President George W. Bush, Lefkowitz served as general counsel\nin the Office of Management and Budget and later as deputy director of domestic policy at\nthe White House.\n\nAccommodating such influential figures must have seemed like a good career move.\nHaving Starr and Lefkowitz on his side might help Acosta get a judgeship, a cabinet\nappointment, or a high-paying job back at Kirkland and Ellis.\n\nI'm speculating, of course. But my speculation finds support in Acosta's practice of\naccommodating the powerful.\n\nMuch of that accommodation is of Democrats. Indeed, at the time Acosta was working in\nMiami as a U.S. Attorney, he had alienated some Republicans by such accommodation\nwhile at the Department of Justice. Some say he was on the verge of being fired when\nAttorney General Alberto Gonzalez parachuted him to Miami. The Epstein settlement was a\nway for Acosta to shore up his standing with some influential Republicans.\n\nWill Acosta be able to survive the current scandal? I don't have a clear sense about this yet.\nBut President Trump, who isn't bashful about sacking cabinet members, may come to\nbelieve (if he doesn't now) that it's disadvantageous to have a cabinet member who sold out\nteenage victims of sexual abuse, especially when the sell-out benefited an ultra-wealthy\nserial offender.\n\n* Some on the left are trying to make something or the fact that Starr, who had investigated\nBill Clinton in connection with sexual misconduct, later defended Epstein, a pervert. This is\nsilly.\n\nIn both instances, Starr was doing his job as a lawyer. Perverts are entitled to a defense and\nthere is nothing hypocritical about investigating Bill Clinton's misconduct when that was\nStarr's job and later joining the team that was defending Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nAcosta, by contrast, was on the team seeking justice for Epstein and for his victims. He\ngave up this quest for reasons that can't be defended."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/6/2018 10:25:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "IF\nhttps://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article222705765.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023282.txt_22302
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023282.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Leon, I decided last week that there was little or no upside in disturbing your well earned holiday especiaily as you seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc. however the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last days of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs , old stock sales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same ,topco midco.etc still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no care for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens audit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to discuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you left. asi said before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't work for me but works for you. . I tried."}, {"sender": "jeffrey", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:03 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Brad Wechsler is asking if you could meet for a half hour with him and Rich Joslin to discuss Use Tax Refund. Below are available dates/times...below that is your schedule. OK for me to schedule in?: NO sorry not until i hear from leon leon. to be fair, I had sent the first note to you one year ago . stating that my work would come to an end on oct 15. that day had meaning as everything would be closed. you asked that 1 continue to help brad. as of nov though he would officially start in jan. I said ok, but ..... \"you told me to continue as we would work something out\" I told you my fee then was 40. feb you came with ben while kathy rnemmler was here. and said next week, debra got bad news. and I quickly prioritzed not adding stress to your situation. I wont regurgitate the interim, though millions of dollars were saved since. millions. . it is now one year later and you propose 10 million , plus a contingent fee . I have said that 1 would work with you , and if contingent and a percentage of something. I strongly believe that is not in your interest. I continue to put our friendship first and dont want you to write a check for over 100million andthe i will have to listen to lewie for the next few years. but if you prefer over my objection a percentage deal then it should be of all savings not just phaidon. ( arandom concept). The idea that iam somehow even marginally responsible for neither you nor heather , ever telling me that there was an unresolved issue, though you said you had been pinged a number of times is emblematic . I can do a call with you and Karp. anytime you like today, but ican assure you 100 percent that there is no light between our positions. ZERO. and he is ready to do his best to try to explain it to you."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "to refresh your recollection, as 4 states. 40 a year for three years. asisaid today. . the other was in addtion as you recall."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "1. 80 percent of contracted job is accomplished, now drafting ,signing and few critical decisions on your part still await , will fill in nec blanks, 1, how much of upside to kids. , 2, protections . 3 allocations. 4. charitiable, inventory, securities,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt_22303
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
subject: Fw: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/17/2018 2:48:49 PM", "subject": "Fw: Viceland", "body": "FYI"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 17, 2018 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Hello Marty,\n\nJust following up on the email I sent you earlier this week requesting comment from Mr Epstein, or a representative of his, in regards a number of questions we had. I'm also cc-ing my colleague Tracie, as going forward she will be a better point of contact should you or Mr Epstein wish to respond.\n\nKind regards,\nMatt"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "13 August 2018 at 15:15", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty,\n\nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me after reviewing. Kind regards - Matt\n\nA former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr Epstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?\n\nOn one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched “young girls try on bikinis” while making comments on their bodies. Does Mr Epstein have any comment?\n\nHow does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as “sex slaves” at his properties?\n\nA former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on numerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?\n\nDid or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein remove those cameras before police raided the property as part of the investigation into alleged crimes? Did Mr Epstein ever hand over any recordings from any cameras at his properties to the authorities as part of his non-prosecution agreement?\n\nDoes Mr Epstein have in his possession any video recordings of Donald Trump taken from inside his Palm Beach estate or any other residence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein hold sex parties at his residences involving girls under the age of sexual consent? Was Donald Trump ever present at any of these parties?\n\nHas Mr Epstein upheld the conditions of his sentencing and registered as a sex offender in all jurisdictions in which he is due to do so?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.txt_22306
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031730.txt
subject: Re: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["DAN CHRISTENSEN"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "He verified the affidavit- like a notary- verifying/swearing to only the fact that the officer who filled it out and signed it\nwas who he purports to be. When an officer does that for the officer drafting the document that is all he is doing- he is\nnot swearing to the contents of the document or their veracity- just like any other notary. Make sense?"}, {"sender": "DAN CHRISTENSEN", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "So he didn’t read the affidavit?"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["DAN CHRISTENSEN"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "He did not- he isn’t required to."}, {"sender": "DAN CHRISTENSEN", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:09 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "when’s your flight?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt_22308
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Friday, February 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Have to go to a funeral of an old relative in NJ. Won't be back into city until 3:30 or 4:00. Or what's your weekend look like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "paris be back the Sth for a few days we can do it then"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 9:58:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt_22311
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: \nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on \"The \nScience of Sleep and Dreams\" - 13 episodes, a full season, on —200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. \nContemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious. \nThree documents: \n1) Proposal (12 pages) \n2) Budget (line item) \n3) Schedule (weekly) \nPlease confirm receipt. \nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of \nfun stuff to cheer our 2017. \nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "From Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US \nrelations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M8o1W GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb  \nEarlier interview on BBC \"What Chinese think of Trump\" - two minute excerpt \n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9b4  \nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 6:02:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When to meet? Weekend OK."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031724.txt_22321
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031724.txt
subject: Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump Misconduct: Gothamist
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2016 9:07:47 PM", "subject": "Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump Misconduct: Gothamist", "body": "http://gothamist.com/2016/10/10/gloria_allred_trump.php"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023296.txt_22325
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023296.txt
subject: Detailed constructive list.
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. -\nnew decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! .overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 art space. .6 regan arts.\n.7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to\nconsider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc\nreview, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges\n, gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16. new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and\nchildren ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and\ndislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints .\n21. bank loans . rates ? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review\nand reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside\nconsultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex\nfilms . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Lesley Groff (iii iiiii-"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Detailed constructive list.", "body": "please print two copes . re formattted so leon can go line by line ie . headings = question,\ngift answer. blank whoresponsible. timeframe. fee paid when?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "I have mixed emotions about what transpired today. really, You saw first hand in nauseating detail what i\nhave been saying to you for quite a while now. _Joslins answers were totally incomprehensible. the charts he\nprepared unreadable. Brads defensive posture was at a minum very surprising . He and I have recently gotten\nalong quite well , thought. Neither Joslin or Brad understood a 180 million dollar number . no cash flow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "I would like to consider the gaming commmison disclosure dates. .2 we should put to bed once and for all\nadas concerns re the bronzes. . alan should opine on valuation ranges? rather than estimates. . 3. Leons input\nre gagosian purchase. ( trade in, 1031 if 17 likely transfer- . scream, phaidon. plane and boat. 4. I would like\nto review all assignment docs. decanting schedules. ( exhibits ). balance sheets for apol-2 .. loan docs re\ntransfer of narrows inside . 5. Leon should be clear regard future steps. pent etc. swaps , paydowns 6 mock-\nups of all before trigger pull."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: moving forward", "body": "Thad forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. __it was at the end of\nthe meeting described below. . as you will recall , not once , not even a peep did alan suggest\ncontemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD, from\nthe begiining . my emails between alan and I that you can read , further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall\nthe obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with my plan. ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033025.txt_22329
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033025.txt
subject: Re: science in Trump time
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new \nPR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time. \nIt can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you G But what I really like it's \nactually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes a kickstarter with no return, you form a 501 c 3 charity, that can accept donations. and give them out \nto scientists. . it s avery clever idea. good work!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:39 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "I'll think how to execute on it. I'm very focused on my fund but I want it to exist, will find a way"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/10/2017 9:01:16 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes, it could be great. ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030794.txt_22330
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030794.txt
subject:
  Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:32:16 PM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/19/counterprotesters-burn-american-flag-outside-office-maxine-waters.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032903.txt_22334
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032903.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["labor V."], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 12:18:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt_22341
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:31 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the moment. everyone lawyering up in wash.."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT called me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I wonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and that I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy Ruemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. Are you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt_22343
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Raafat Alsabbagh"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 10:21:17 AM", "subject": null, "body": "attached is a first draft , tell me what changes additions or modifications you suggest. I am happy you are returning so fast. If Mohammed really wants to see the future, after seeing the past in Washington with Obama, we should take him to see the Laboratory at MIT.\n\nadvanced robotics. Artificial Intelligence etc."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028614.txt_22344
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028614.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 at 4:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe , tomorrow.."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won’t talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028859.txt_22358
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028859.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt_22361
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt
subject: Re: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication\nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Caroline Lang", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 6:37:32 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt_22370
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:02:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes cell 212-533-3739"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt_22372
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank \n got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work \n for Dillon, Read & \n he didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board, what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "LMAO \n Perfect mnuchin hit"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 10:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "getting rid of powell much more important than syria /mattis. . I guess pompeo , only one left. . unless \n ambassador heather has a brilliant idea. - a first. . jared and ivanka, need to go. !!!"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "Can u get rid of Powell or really get rid of mnuchin"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:44:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "no, mnuchin is ok. . its simple , 15 yrs ago. the geriatrics understood that the internet was \n like telephones. connections only, then my nerds taught them thaat cyber is a weapon. , same with the \n fed. . its a weapon to be used with sophistication. . inflation is a concept from the 50s , before the internet set \n instantaneious info around the world.. s0000 dumb"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt_22384
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt
subject:
  J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"

messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.\n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on\n\nthe political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally.\n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt_22387
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:11:02 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt_22388
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 10:23:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we know jared doesnt do squat without direction. . changes coming"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt_22391
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:07:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt_22392
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt
subject: Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, there are \neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it's way to \na museum. \n\nHope all is well. \n\nSincerely,\nEric Roth\nPresident\nInternational Jet Interiors"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number, or have him call 212 750 9895"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029010.txt_22397
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029010.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a bad movie, president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra, again, sunday, I know you moved krause to tonight.."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :) . re regifting you just have to find people wth the same initials. . i thought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes"}, {"sender": "<MII>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i asked, you told me it was ok that you had changed your plans to be able to make it. i will have someone check that you really mean what you say, ::))"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 3:10:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I had a good idea. Why don't you join us for dinner with Lawrence Krause? That way you get to see us :-). Originally when we got those bundles I thought it was the DNA swabs."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031297.txt_22400
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031297.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal <I E- Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal’s office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year’s ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn’t be more thrilled with this year’s impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn’t be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year’s special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging\n\nfrom Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this year’s ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt_22401
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt
subject: Re: STT Customs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:57 AM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nDue to Staffing issues,, customs cannot use North Ramp,, only PreClear in main building,,.\nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm,. Latest 4:30pm\n\nFlight time: 2+25min\n\nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT?\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "pre clear. heli at 2. thanks"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 4:12:22 PM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "Ok 2pm heli\nPreClear"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt_22409
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Hl a little bit | don't think it will turn into romance | am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:29:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031283.txt_22410
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031283.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 166 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029085.txt_22417
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029085.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Grosof <grosof@sloan.mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 6:28:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature\" issue?\n\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?\n\n6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as \"consciousness hacking.\" He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)\n\nMore to come in a day or so.\n\nThanks!\n\nYou're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!\nDavid\n\nPS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf' as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt_22419
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt
subject:
  Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "Here we go again."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 12:23:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "all fun"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt_22423
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt_22429
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt
subject: Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2011 5:29:30 PM", "subject": "Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]", "body": "Subject: Little Hodiaki\n\nThe teacher said, \"Let's begin by reviewing some American History.\nWho said 'Give me Liberty , or give me Death'?\"\n\nShe saw a sea of blank faces, except for Little Hodiaki a bright foreign\nexchange student from Japan, who had his hand up:'Patrick Henry, 1775'\nshe said..\"Very good!\"\n\nWho said, 'Government of the People, by the People, for the People, shall\nnot perish from the Earth?\"\n\nAgain, no response except from Little Hodiaki, ‘Abraham Lincoln, 1863'..\n\n\"Excellent!', said the teacher continuing, ‘let's try one a bit More difficult…'\n\nWho said, 'Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country?'\nOnce again, Hodiaki's was the only hand in the air and he said;'John F. Kennedy, 1961\".\n\nThe teacher snapped at the class, ‘Class, you should be ashamed of yourselves, Little Hodiaki isn't from this\ncountry and he knows more about our history than you do.\"\n\nShe heard a loud whisper: fuck the Japs,'\n\n\"Who said that? I want to know right now!' she angrily demanded.\nLittle Hodiaki put his hand up, ‘General MacArthur, 1945.’\n\nAt that point, a student in the back said, 'I'm gonna puke.\"\n\nThe teacher glares around and asks, 'All right!!! Now who said that!?'"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029992.txt_22433
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029992.txt
subject: Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016
messages:
  [{"sender": "Terry KafkaMill", "recipients": ["jeff epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/1/2016 11:15:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "Ha! That fuckin lou barbati, its about time someone nailed him over those nuts"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Terry KafkaMill"], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:06:06 -0400", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "too many nuts in the spumoni"}, {"sender": "Jeff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "see top story. Below"}, {"sender": "New York Post <email@nypost.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:01:36 -0400 (EDT)", "subject": "New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "JULY 1, 2016\nOwner of iconic Brooklyn pizza\njoint gunned down in hit job\nThe co-owner of iconic Brooklyn pizzeria L&B\nSpumoni Gardens was shot to death in a targeted\nhit outside his Brooklyn home Thursday night.\nPolice found the slumped body of Louis Barbati,\n61, at his home on 12th Avenue in Dyker\nHeights at about 7 p.m. with gunshot wounds to\nthe head and chest, according to law-\nenforcement sources. The assassin, described as\na white man in his 30s wearing a black hoodie,\napproached Barbati, who was returning from the\nBensonhurst pizzeria, which was once at the\ncenter of a Mafia extortion plot over a sto..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt_22438
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/19/2012 5:57:05 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I'm in Istanbul, private meeting of asian, middle eastern + north african families.\nApparently Donald Trump is also in town today to open the Trump Tower Istanbul."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt_22465
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal <>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\n\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone’s groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it.\n\nIn 1987, right after director Oliver Stone won the Academy Award for \"Platoon,\" he immediately turned to a domestic arena and began working on \"Wall Street\" in New York City where his father had been a stockbroker. Although the film was widely seen as a scathing critique of the culture of Wall Street, Stone has said that part of the film is a defense of capitalism, his father's vision of finance (as seen through the Hal Holbrook character) and an homage to his father.\n\nAt the time Oliver was also fascinated with the connection between the psyche of Latino Miami drug dealers from his earlier \"Scarface\" script and the American-born 28- to 35-year-old, white collar stockbrokers. Both groups had an animalistic need to obtain big and fast money. They shared an obsession with corruption and greed.\n\nOliver sent his actors to Bear Stearns for research, including then-newcomer Charlie Sheen, who played Bud Fox, a kid from nowhere. When he learns to cold call, and lands one big client, Gordon Gekko, Fox is thrust into the fast lane with a rock star financial mentor who teaches him corruption.\n\nOliver needed an old-fashioned villain to create drama, and he cast Michael Douglas as Gekko against type. Michael was not known as a heavy at the time, but as a charming, handsome, sensitive leading man. Oliver also saw the anger, confidence, salesmanship and style that Michael brought to the role. Michael's Gekko looked a bit like Laker's coach Pat Riley with his slicked back hair and well-cut suits, and it became Michael’s most important role, winning him the Academy Award for the villain no one could ever forget."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal (i |"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt_22471
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt
subject: FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 10:36:57 PM", "subject": "FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": "Attachments: Trump 1_trump.pdf\n\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:36 PM", "subject": "Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021553.txt_22476
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021553.txt
subject: B-MM-105207-D, 07/25/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Lem"], "timestamp": "07/25/2008", "subject": "Re: B-MM-105207-D, 07/25/2008", "body": "Please deliver the enclosed letter and brochures to\nIn addition, please confirm completion of this\nmatter.\nRead and Clear"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029907.txt_22482
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029907.txt
subject: Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 3:02:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "GOOD FOR THE LACK OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 7, 2019, at 4:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html"}, {"sender": "paul krassner <q", "recipients": ["\"Friend\"", "\"HumanEvents.com” <r-"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "From: Ann Coulter Subject: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal’\n\nDate: March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST\n\nTo: \"Friend\"\n\nReply-To: \"HumanEvents.com” <r-\nsmilbbqqlsnfcqqgvnrswzfrrbsfrffsqzpgqvagfvzccqwisb@humaneventsmail.com>\n\n=a\n\nMedia Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile\nBecame a \"Trump Scandal'\n\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and\nmajor Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt_22483
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know how well you know tom barrack he is great."}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Who is that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 12:01:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He will be a speaker at the convention, he runs colony capital. solid, great real estate judgement. . donalds fund raiser. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-05-31/tom-barrack-the-donald-trump-i-know"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019845.txt_22486
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019845.txt
subject: When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero - ProPublica
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [kathy.ruemmler@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 2:45:19 PM", "subject": "When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero - ProPublica", "body": "https://www.propublica.org/article/when-it-comes-to-wall-street-preet-bharara-is-no-hero\n\nWhen It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt_22503
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjørn Jagland", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:04:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt_22507
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt
subject: Denis McDhimmi White House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:57:57 PM", "subject": "Denis McDhimmi White House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group", "body": "Bill Siegel thought you might find this of interest: \nhttp://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8911/pub_detail.asp \n\nMarch 8, 2011 \nDenis McDhimmi \nWhite House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group \nBill Siegel  \n\nOn March 6, in anticipation of Congressional hearings on domestic radicalization, Deputy National Security Adviser \nDenis McDonough stated the following: \n\"President Obama recognizes that through our words and deeds we can either play into al Qaeda's narrative and \nmessaging or we can challenge it and thereby undermine it. We're determined to undermine it. For example, we \nknow there are many different reasons why individuals—from many different faiths—succumb to terrorist \nideologies. And there is no one easy profile of a terrorist. But based on extensive investigations, research and \nprofiles of the violent extremists we've captured or arrested, and who falsely claim to be fighting in the name of \nIslam, we know that they all share one thing—they all believe that the United States is somehow at war with \nIslam, and that this justifies violence against Americans. So we are actively and aggressively undermining that \nideology. We're exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama \nhas stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam.\" \n\nThis statement encapsulates so much of what this writer has identified as the \"Control Factor:\" that function of \nour minds which will distort our perceptions so as not to present ourselves with the ever so fearful reality that \nconfronts us under the banner of Islam today. That is, rather than to clearly see, focus upon, and set about to \ncreate strategies to properly confront the threat which we currently face- a threat that by definition we do not \ncontrol and see little way over which to regain control- our minds essentially collude to reconstruct in a manner \nwhich deludes us with the sense that we are in control. \n\n1. The statement essentially reduces the threat we face to that of terrorism caused by al-Qaeda. By defining and \nlimiting the threat to a band of \"radical extremists\" who have distorted the doctrine of a great religion, we buy \ninto the sense that our military might and criminal detection methods will ultimately save the day. The fantasy is \nthat this is a problem that we can get our arms around because under our Constitutional principles, terrorism is a \nviolation that we are permitted to fight against. \n\nYet terrorism is only one of three levels upon which the threat is attacking us and al-Qaeda is only a piece of the \nterrorism level. The second level, the \"Civilization Jihad,\" a term used by the Muslim Brotherhood itself to \ndescribe its long term effort to peaceably infiltrate American and Western society at all levels in order to bring it \ndown from the inside through the freedoms that Western Constitutions afford, is well at work and in process \ntoday. This has also been called the \"Stealth Jihad.\" \n\nThere is a third level, the \"International Institutional Jihad,\" upon which organizations such as the UN, along with \nits 57 Member State bloc the Organization of the Islamic Conference, work to push through those principles of \nSharia Law and Islamic doctrine which it Members can agree upon such as the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human \nRights which is fully at odds with U.S. Constitutional tenets. Once these principles become international \nstandards, the institutions seek to push them into Western societies through treaties and trade deals over which \nthe Members have leverage. \n\nMcDonough's words, by limiting the threat to Al Qaeda, intentionally ignore the other levels of threat which, for \nall intents and purposes can be even more dangerous because our Constitution does not afford us easy means to \ncombat. Nor does our desired general sense of morality. \n\n2. By focusing on \"reasons\" for this terrorist piece of the pie, the Control Factor further sets out the narrative \nthat we can gain control over the problem. By looking for \"root causes,\" we advance the notion that by \neliminating or reducing those elements we can eliminate the symptom-terrorism. This is part of a long-engaged \nLeftist narrative that has been utilized across a vast array of social problems in order to gain control over funding \nand policy. Now, it is being used to avoid seeing a problem clearly, much less addressing it intelligently. \n\nIt is this administration's (and also, unfortunately, many members of Bush's as well) distortion to frame terrorism \nas a result of victimhood. That is, by establishing the root causes of terrorism as either a response to U.S. policy, \nto economic conditions, to Israeli occupation, and so on, the Control Factor sells the buried wish that since we \ncause the conditions, we can fix the symptom without the grueling costs of war and confrontation. When both \nsides collude in this form of narrative, we allow it to continue and grow. Yet placing the cause of the problem \nwithin ourselves is false and strips us of the proper incentive to stand up and fight against a threat that simply \nseeks our destruction no matter what we do. \n\n3. McDonough fights the enemy's battle for us in the simple phrase of those \"who falsely claim to be fighting in \nthe name of Islam.\" Here, the Control Factor refuses to accept what the enemy has repeatedly made clear—there \nis a Holy War between Islam and the Western world, it has been declared by a significant faction of Muslims and \nagreed upon by many more either explicitly or through silence and omission, and the war is defined by the enemy \nitself under the banner of Islam to seek the destruction of Western society as it is and to replace it with a Sharia \nbased global Islamic Ummah. This is what the enemy says itself. The Control Factor tells us that this can not be, \nthat Islam is a \"peaceful\" and \"great\" religion that has been \"hijacked\" by a few \"crazies\" and that most \nMuslims worldwide are much like us peace loving Westerners who seek a world based on mutual tolerance. If \nthere is any \"war,\" it emanates from those of us Westerners who are \"racists,\" \"bigots,\" or otherwise and fail to \nacknowledge the realities of the Muslim peoples. The critical issue here is that the Control Factor, as expressed \nthrough McDonough, takes full responsibility for defining Islam and identifying the enemy. The enemy, however, \ndefines itself and needs to identify itself both through its actions, its words, and importantly what it does not do \nand say. \n\nThis \"transfer of responsibility\" from the enemy to ourselves that McDonough's words so freely take on is \nsymptomatic of the deep addictive style the West has adopted to avoid hard confrontation. Once again, the \nControl Factor utilizes Western guilt to define the conflict as resulting from improper acts of its own. It then \nseeks to redeem itself by accommodating the enemy. This shows up in America's dealings with Islam as well as \nthe \"Israeli-Palestinian Conflict;\" responsibility for the problem is transferred to the West or Israel in a grand \npsychological effort to avoid facing the terrors and costs of hard confrontation, terror, or war. And in each \nexample, as with all psychological defenses, the defense creates the very conditions it seeks to avoid. Until the \nWest is fully able to place responsibility back upon the Islamic world for the actions it takes and omits to take, \nthe West will only dig itself deeper into a weaker position. Unfortunately, the game of guilt gives us no guidance \nas to how it is to end; when enough has been repaid. Instead, it is geared to continue indefinitely. \n\n4. McDonough's statement that the U.S. is not at war with Islam is a pleasant Control Factor fantasy but does \nlittle to eliminate the fact that the enemy has declared it so. We can walk away and pretend there is no war, \nfollow the deceptive words of those in this country engaged in the Civilization Jihad who attack us for any \nresponse to the war other than bending over backwards to accommodate Islam and tolerate that which does not \ntolerate anything other than itself. Yet that path leads only to further the cause of the enemy. \n\n5. Perhaps most telling of all of McDonough's statement is the word \"never.\" To claim we will never be at war \nwith Islam regardless of what Islam or Muslims worldwide do to us is the height of Dhimmitude—a phrase coined \nby Bat Yeor, an expert on Dhimmi behavior throughout Islamic history. In Islam, a Dhimmi is generally a Jew or \nChristian (there are others) who has agreed to accept a lesser and humiliating status with duties including the \npayment of a special tax, in exchange for life in an Islamic controlled land. It is a protection contract: you can \nlive as long as you abide by these conditions. In claiming that we could \"never\" be at war with Islam, McDonough \nhas staked out Dhimmi status for all non-Muslims in the U.S. and has put words to the famous act of Obama in \nbowing to the King of Saudi Arabia. \n\nBy denying that we are at war with Islam, McDonough has admitted that those words have meaning, just that \nthey do not fit U.S. policy. By denying that the U.S. would ever be at war with Islam, McDonough has sent the \nmessage of unconditional surrender in advance. This is pure Control Factor maneuvering and threatens our nation \nworse than the underlying threat itself. Put simply, our Constitution does not afford us easy ways to combat the \nthreat we face- we can fight certain types of terrorism in certain (albeit still under great dispute) ways yet we \nhave no effective means to combat the Civilization Jihad and are fast losing leverage to resist the International \nInstitutional Jihad. Unless and until we all obtain better control over our Control Factors so that we can develop \nsufficient acceptable means to fight on these levels, we are headed to self-destruction."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt_22509
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt
subject: US idiocy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 1:36:48 PM", "subject": "US idiocy", "body": "re your comment on predicting Trump, there is HL Mencken's famous phrase: \n\"It is IMPOSSIBLE to underestimate the intelligence of the American people.\" \nand then from Richard Hofstadter's 1964 book on Ant-intellectualism in American Life: \n\"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has \nbeen a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that \ndemocracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.\" \nOnly thing stupefying me about Trump so far is that all his EPA appointees come from the great wasteland called \nOklahoma—Inhofe et al, climate change deniers to the last, but climate change is inescapable and by going back to \nour old way of doing things, it will merely come all the quicker \nall best"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt_22510
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Mr Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\n\n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money.\n\nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions:\n\n2) Why you had Swiss accounts.\n\n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs.\n\nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that:\n\n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison.\n\n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner.\n\n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey.\n\n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\"\n\nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK.\n\nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment.\n\nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to _________________, we shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information.\n\nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate.\n\n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)\n\nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have.\n\nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Mr Weinberg"], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\n\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt_22520
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\n\nNow remember"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:24:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt_22524
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt
subject: Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:55:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Look what has happened to your borough.."}, {"sender": "Dr. Bruce L. Dennis <j", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Dear Packer Families,\n\nLike many of you, I am writing this message on very little sleep. Last night was like no other in our\npolitical memory, defying the predictions of the most erudite pundits and political\nprognosticators.\n\nToday, we are spending a great deal of time unpacking the election results with our students\nacross the three divisions — during morning meeting and throughout the day in Lower School\nclassrooms, in Middle School advisories, during Upper School Community time, as well as in\nmany individual classroom conversations. I write to assure you that we will do our best to handle\nthese discussions with balance, sensitivity, and fairness.\n\nGiven that last week's mock election among Packer’s Upper School students showed that over\n80% favored Secretary Clinton, I don’t think it’s a huge leap to assume that there was more\ndisappointment than joy in Packer households as results unfolded last night. At the same time,\nthere are certainly Packer families who support Mr. Trump and are pleased with this outcome. As\na school community, we have an obligation to recognize that there will be a broad array of feelings\ngenerated by the election results, and it is our responsibility as a school to make space for these\nfeelings to be expressed thoughtfully and compassionately, as well as to model the tolerance and\nacceptance of difference that are among our core values. No doubt, we have our work cut out for\nus, but Iam confident in the good that we can do as a community."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029979.txt_22526
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029979.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2012 8:05:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i spoke with Janusz and he was agreeable and happy to stay on and continue working for you \nhis wife is still working for trump but that will be short term and she will then look for new work \nif janusz still works for you he plans to live on the property with his wife \nplease advise if i should reinstate his employment and if so as of what date?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "just mentioned that you were open to entertaining Janusz staying on with a new clearly defined role \nShould i call and feel him out?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030610.txt_22536
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030610.txt
subject: any fun?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Niki"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "any fun?", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "boris", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "any fun?", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028497.txt_22542
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028497.txt
subject: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \n\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. you her co. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me. \nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I'll send that along your \nway. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2:"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/20/2017 8:09:46 PM", "subject": "RE: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Steven, \nSee below: \n\nCompany Name: The Peggy Siegal Company \nContact Name: Peggy Siegal \nAddress: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt_22566
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "???"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 7:00:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i forget to ask.. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013415.txt_22573
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013415.txt
subject: Privileged and Confidential
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jackie Perczek"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential", "body": "See additional articles.\n\nAttachments: Edwards Articles -1.doc; Edwards Articles - 12.pdf; Edwards Articles - 10.pdf; Edwards Articles - 9.doc; Edwards Articles - 8.doc; Edwards Articles - 7.doc; Edwards Articles - 6.doc; Edwards Articles - 5.doc; Edwards Articles - 3.doc; Edwards Articles - 2.doc; Edwards Article - 13.pdf; Part.012"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt_22590
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein, \nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned. \nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below."}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein, \nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present. \nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts. \nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money. \nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include: \nHSBC (Suisse) SA \nFAMILY INTEREST L.P. \n22079 \nBESSIE \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money. \nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions: \n2) Why you had Swiss accounts. \n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs. \nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that: \n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison. \n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner. \n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey. \n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\" \nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK. \nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment. \nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to \nwe shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information. \nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate. \n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.) \nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have. \nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing."}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg, \nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London. \nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client. \nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded. \nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029042.txt_22593
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029042.txt
subject: Re: interesting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:18:14 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "no, interesting to figure out where it is heading....the funny side it was at the vatican"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 18, 2016, at 12:14 PM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "your view?"}, {"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.\n\nWell before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was a “global tea party movement” and praised European far-right parties like Great Britain’s UKIP and France’s National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist element in far-right parties “all gets kind of washed out,” that the West was facing a “crisis of capitalism” after losing its “Judeo-Christian foundation,” and he blasted “crony capitalists” in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial crisis.\n\nThe remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in a secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 50-minute Q&A during a conference focused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News attended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe’s religious right. The group was founded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the European Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a “Christian voice” in European politics. The group has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic\n\nChurch; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who was ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, 1s chair of the group’s advisory board.\n\nBuzzFeed News originally posted a transcript beginning 90 seconds into the then-\n\nBreitbart News chairman’s remarks because microphone placement made the opening"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031250.txt_22598
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031250.txt
subject: Re item 6:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re item 6:", "body": "Re item 6: You report on ASU’s response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU’s investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along with the statement made in the complaint that\n\n\"It is the University’s understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\n\nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows:\n\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in\n\nan unwelcome manner.\n\n- The conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took\nthe ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested\nin the course of the investigation.\"\n\n(And for the record | often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as | specifically request selfies not to include flashes,\nso that | don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\n\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that | get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come\nup to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. | am particularly proud of the way | attempt to make all\npeople feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what | am about, which is to\nacknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As | understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take\nselfies at the CFl conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, | am proud of the\ninteractions | have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. | have had numerous female graduate students,\npostdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the\ncontrary in fact, as | have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. | treat others as responsible adults,\nand | expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous <n>", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015588.txt_22601
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015588.txt
subject: RE: questions for Dershowitz
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Cassell", "recipients": ["Paul Blake"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 3, 2015 11:14 AM", "subject": "RE: questions for Dershowitz", "body": "Questions for Alan Dershowitz\n\n1. Have you ever met a young girl, under the age of 18, in the presence of Jeffrey Epstein or on one of Jeffrey Epstein’s properties?\n\n2. How many times have you visited Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida?\n\n3. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida reached a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, in which he agreed to make civil restitution for sexual abuse committed against 40 girls at the mansion. Do you have any reason to doubt that that Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused 40 underaged girls.\n\n4. Didn't Jeffrey Epstein tell you that he repeatedly had sex with these underage girls?\n\n4. Jeffrey Epstein is a now a registered sex offender. Do you have any reason to doubt that this registration is appropriate?\n\n5. Have you ever met Ghislaine Maxwell in the presence of Jeffrey Epstein or at one of his properties?\n\n6. Did you send correspondence to the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. (or elsewhere) attacking the credibility of these 40 girls?\n\n7. According to testimony in court cases, when Jeffrey Epstein was at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, he would receive almost daily “massages” that were in fact sexual encounters with these underage girls. Do you have any reason to doubt this testimony?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024295.txt_22606
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024295.txt
subject: What is the French paradox?
messages:
  [{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/7/2019 7:03:04 PM", "subject": "What is the French paradox?", "body": "Answer: People refer to French paradox when they are talking about the puzzlin...\n\nJeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\nWhat is the French paradox?\n\nOlga Persson, knows French\nWritten Jun 26\n\nPeople refer to French paradox when they are talking about the puzzling phenomenon of French people getting away with murder vis-a-vis food and drink. Unapologetic love for...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhat’s the legality of living on a boat (any size) off the coast in the U.S.?\n\nJeanne Pockel, 28 years full-time blue water sailing/cruising, 50 countries\nWritten Jun 24\n\nHave you noticed that you don’t see many boats anchored off the shore of ocean beaches? And rarely if ever overnight? That boats anchor in harbors, bay, rivers, but not off...\n\nRead More »\n\nIf x^2 + 16 = 0, then what is x?\n\nDave Clark, studied Mathematics at Queens' College, Cambridge\nWritten Nov 15, 2018\n\n[math]x^2 + 16 = 0[/math]\n\n[math]\\therefore x^2 = -16[/math]\n\n[math]\\therefore x = \\pm \\sqrt{-16}[/math]\n\nNegative numbers have no square roots in the real numbers, so if you are looking for real values only then there are no solutions. If we are looking for complex values too ...\n\nRead More »\n\nAs a flight attendant, what is the most disrespectful thing a passenger has ever requested from you?\n\nSusan Brown, Flight Attendant\nUpdated Jan 2\n\nI once had a strange passenger that asked me to go and check the ‘’toilet’’ for her, before she went in.\n\nI asked her why she wanted me to check the lavatory FOR HER. She tol...\n\nRead More »\n\nPeople in many countries enjoy bashing the French. Are their reasons the same, or do they vary country to country? What do you think is the source of French-bashing in your country?\n\nDiane Allen, Self-Employed Pharmacy Owner 27 Years and Counting\nWritten May 3\n\nI find this an interesting question. My sister-in-law was born and raised in France. She has lived in the US 35+ years. Last time she went home to visit her family, she cam...\n\nRead More »\n\nIf a car pulls across your driveway and blocks your car in and you need to leave is there any way to move the car without breaking the law?\n\nErik Pistek, former Detective NYPD Retired\nWritten Jul 1\n\nYes. Ask a neighbor if they have a floor jack with wheels. Jack the car up from the center of axle Just enough to get tires off ground. Then push the car from the side fend...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhy does Warren Buffett live like a poor person?\n\nJohn Gill\nUpdated May 23\n\n1.\tHis house is worth $650,000\n2.\tHe flies by private jet\n3.\tHis California vacation home is worth $11,000,000\n4.\tHe drives a Cadillac...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhat indeed happens when you drop the soap in jail?\n\nPaul Passmore, Activist in the black community\nWritten Jun 30\n\nUsually, you have to yell really loudly to one of your friends or bunkmate and tell him to bring you another bar of soap. And that invites everyone within earshot to laugh ...\n\nRead More »\n\nDo you think it's inappropriate for John Oliver to call President Donald Trump an \"Uncooperative Toddler\"?\n\nJames Elefante\nWritten Jun 24\n\nWhat’s that my mother used to say about “if you can’t stand the heat then get out of the kitchen.” He we have THE PRESIDENT of the United States giving childish and bullish...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhat do they say in French at a restaurant when asking the customers “for here or to go?”\n\nCathelène Dechesne, knows French\nUpdated Jun 24\n\nHello! I’m French, and I would love to answer this question for you :)\n\nIn France, when ordering a meal at a restaurant, if the waiter/waitress asks a customer “for here or t...\n\nRead More »"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt_22608
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt
subject: Re: Huffington Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal <r"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 1 2011 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "I think a great opportunity has arisen. Just like the headlines of a hotel maid now proven to have lied in the Stauss Kahn case. The girl who accused Prince Andrew can also easily be proven to be a liar. I think Buckingham Palace would love it . You should task someone to investigate the girl Virginia Roberts, that has caused the Queens son all this agro. I promise you she is a fraud. you and 1 will be able to go to ascot for the rest of our lives. I know there is a public police report that no one has had the courage to publish, as they do not want to be seen attacking a\" vicitm\", but being falsely accused will be the new headline"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <r", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "Ifyou rewrite your last email in better grammar, (and so I have a better understanding) I can cut and paste and send it to Arianna Huffington from me.....\n\nDid you know why Prince Albert's Charlene fled to the airport with a one way ticket back to South Africa? Because she found out about a third illegitimate child that is 3 months old...the palace officials followed her to the airport and propably made her an offer she could not refuse...will get details from Jim Coleman when he comes home Sunday night.\n\nIn Southampton now. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jul 01 07:18:25 2011", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn is Andrews accuser, ,long criminal record. total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send areporter or reporters to investigate,.. the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone answerer,, she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs ridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt_22609
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt
subject: Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2016 3:37:10 AM", "subject": "Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-fills-white-house-counsel-and-deputy-national-security-posts/2016/11/25/c4dee8d2-b341-11e6-belc-8cec35blad25_story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt_22611
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt
subject: Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 9:55:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "patterson book on my a flop and his work with clinton worse. hes old. but has a name. there is also john\nconally. hes on it as well"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "and Patterson's not!!"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "berlinger is a bit of a hack. when you get a moment give me a call"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Patterson , the Perversion of Justice Team , and the guy making the \"Ted Bundy’ film --- sounds like a\npotential hagiography"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 3:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Fw: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey....how much do you know about this?\nWhen can | call you tomorrow? | know nothing but have friends at Netflix.\n\nEleanora Kennedy called me today....out of the blue...and told me the film makers wanted to talk to me. |\nknow director Joe Berlinger, not well, but may have done a screening on one of his films. Would have to\ncheck.\n\n| am around all day tomorrow.\nxoxo Peggy"}, {"sender": "Timothy Jones", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, April 22, 2019 4:16 PM", "subject": "Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Peggy,\n\nMy good friend Eleanora reached out to you on my behalf and | appreciate you wanting to hear\nmore about this project."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029969.txt_22615
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029969.txt
subject: Hello!!!
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/25/2017 8:53:16 PM", "subject": "Hello!!!", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nJust called, but not sure I have the right cell number for you. Thinking of you and hope life is treating you great! Any \nnews? \nAll good here in the District of Corruption — I'm lovin' Trump. He is turning this town on its head, and have to admit, I'm \nenjoying watching the action (except for the shooting, of course, which was tragic). Especially interesting is watching \nthe Dems implode — I'm really shocked at how wrong they judged the public. Am having dinner tonight with one of the \nBlue Dog Dems, and think they could maneuver to take over the party — Rep. Jim Costa is the defacto head — we'll \nsee. Have popcorn, sitting back and watching the show 0 \nJust got a big promotion to Manager of Senior Health, Virginia Hospital Center/Mayo Clinic. Am very excited, and love \nthe job — it is so rewarding. I spend most of my time giving lectures on neurodegenerative diseases, sleep, heart health \nand strategies for longevity. And the rest of the time as liaison to State and local Department's of Aging, facilitator to \nthe Alzheimer and Dementia Caregiver Support Group and managing the assistive technology program. \nIf you hear of any special panels or commissions President Trump is forming, please keep me in mind. Sure the hospital \nwon't mind loaning me out, and pretty sure I'm one of a handful of Republican Gerontologists 0. \nLet me know if you get to DC. Would LOVE to see you!!! \nMiss you and all the great times we had xxxx \nPS. How are Fred and Mort doing? \nGerontologist, Longevity & Successful Aging"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt_22617
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
subject: told you
messages:
  [{"sender": "NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.dov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n\n***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.\n\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\nDocket Text:\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmlerl"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 10:17:45 PM", "subject": "told you", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030600.txt_22620
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030600.txt
subject:
  Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online

messages:
  [{"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["gmax", "Ross Gow"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 at 5:09 AM", "subject": "Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online", "body": "Dear Ghislaine\n\nBelow is a link to today's Mail.\n\nThe allegations are getting worse - this is not astorm you can ride by not making any statement out and get your life back. You have friends saying they don't believe you would act in this way and you need to say that you did not.\n\nThe Mail website is read by 193 million | don't see how a statement denying the allegations will make matters worse which is the acid test. It will make your position better as you will astrong open denial on record. These allegations must not gain traction.\n\n| wont say anymore as | have given my advice - call me.\n\nBest\n\nPhilip\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2900787/Prince-Andrew-Heidi-Klum-Hookers-Pimps-party-New-York-socialite-accused-procuring-underage-girls-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <GMax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 02:52 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online", "body": "lam going o have to make astatement —| will send it to you—| don’t have a choice"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9 2015 02:52 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online", "body": "Ok, tie it to the easily disproved Clinton"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032667.txt_22626
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032667.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "??? very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask.. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 10:32:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028487.txt_22632
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028487.txt
subject: Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 2:22:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/28/2015 5:59:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Sample, Elizabeth <111", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau W"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 28, 2015 5:24 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "\"Fitz Corr\"", "recipients": ["\"Fitz Corr\""], "timestamp": "March 27, 2015 at 5:24:21 PM EDT", "subject": "Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": "Do You Know This Guy?\nHe is Edward \"Ed\" Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937. And so who is\nEd Mezvinsky?\nWell, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's\n1st congressional district in the United States House of\nRepresentatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977.\nHe sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of\nRichard Nixon.\nHe was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to\npolitics and the nation and should be impeached.\nHe and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for\nmany years.\nEd Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue\nMargolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.\nIn 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in\nCongress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton's\ncontroversial tax package through the House of Representatives.\nIn March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31\nof 69 counts of federal criminal bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.\nEd Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people\nvia both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams.\nHe was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison.\nAfter serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in\nApril 2008 and remains on federal probation.\nTo this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his many\nvictims.\nAbout now you are saying, \"So what!\"\nWell, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.\nThat's right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law.\nNow Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a $10.5\nmillion NYC apartment.\nHas anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media?\nIf this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet, Sarah Palin's\ndaughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and\nevery detail would be reported over and over and over.\nAnd yet liberals say there are no double standards in political\nreporting.\nAnd people are already talking about Hillary as our next\nPresident!\nAnd then there is possibly Chelsea for president in our\nfuture!\nThe cycle never ends!\nLying and corruption seem to make Democrat\ncandidates more popular.\nWAKE UP AMERICA\nI have removed all previous addresses before sending this to you as well as sending it to you as a \"blind copy\". Please\nremove my address before forwarding."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033579.txt_22633
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033579.txt
subject: Re: new schedule
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["lsj"], "timestamp": "Feb 4, 2017, at 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "monday 4 pm to lsj, thurs morning pre clear to palm beach. sunday 12 new york. tues paris to 21 new york. 24 santa fe. -march 1"}, {"sender": "Larry Visosk", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/5/2017 12:32:54 AM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "Monday 4pm confirmed\nPres Trump departs Monday at 11 am,. TFR in place until 11:30am Monday, which requires 24 hour notice for\nDeparture screening if departing during TFR hours.,\nTFR (Temporally Flight Restriction),\nOur departure time of 4:30 PM will not be impacted since TFR expires 11:30am Monday,.\nFYI,\nFriday, Josh left voicemail indicating chevron should present purchase agreement by midday Monday. for your\nreview.,\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031278.txt_22642
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031278.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM", "body": "Darren:\n\nCharles"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028493.txt_22656
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028493.txt
subject: Michael Wolff: My Insane Year Inside Trump's White House
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:19:23 PM", "subject": "Michael Wolff: My Insane Year Inside Trump's White House", "body": "Read this\nhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013405.txt_22658
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013405.txt
subject: Privileged and Confidential
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jackie Perczel"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 1:44 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential", "body": "Attachments: Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act I Main Justice.pdf; Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein agreement thrown out.pdf; Edwards Articles - Rush Interview 2.pdf; Edwards Articles - Rush Interview.pdf; Part.005 Additional Articles."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030614.txt_22659
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030614.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gqmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Niko"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <borisnikolic@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time butiam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt_22674
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-emmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "They r all jumping ship - its totally crazy - it's time to worry"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:57:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I hear Kelly Ann Conway next"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt_22676
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt
subject: Fwd: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won't take long to do. We're just swamped. I'll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn't be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean? \n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive. \n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "Melanie Spinella <melanie@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen <barryjcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <melaniespinella@example.com>"], "timestamp": "10/3/2017 12:26:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Plane management", "body": "does this mean that under their brilliant structure you will have a profit and pay tax for using your plane??! . call me re other issue please we need to make a decision today"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029766.txt_22677
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029766.txt
subject: Fwd: raw text
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 02:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: raw text", "body": "Scott was able to send me the attachments below but there are no highlights. Darren, if you want to call me and read me the highlights, I can type them on a Word Doc as you dictate...(?) (Even when Scott opened them on his end he had no highlights)"}, {"sender": "Scott Denett", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM", "subject": "raw text", "body": "According to Friday's NY Post Jeffrey Epstein returned to New York City \"making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an underage girl\". \"I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender,' \" the Wall Street hedge fund manager told The Post. \"It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel,\" said Epstein.\n\nWell that's not exactly the correct analogy...\n\nNot only are Epstein's comments brazen, they are arrogant and self-implicating. By telling a reporter \"I'm an offender\", he seems to be admitting guilt.\n\nWhich brings me to the big question of the day. Why did Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan D.A., allow a Level 3 sex offender (the most dangerous kind) to reside -- even for ten minutes -- in a house that is right next to Central Park and a school? Isn't that unlawful given the housing guidelines for sex offenders?\n\nAccording to the NYPost, Epstein's Level 3 designation means that he is at \"high risk\" to repeat his offense and poses \"a threat to public safety.\"\n\nWhen I rang Vance (twice) to discuss Epstein's residential guidelines he did not take my calls.\n\nAccording to a few of the attorneys who represented Epstein's victims in the civil cases, the financier never agreed to a psychological evaluation prior to or during his sentence, a requirement of all sexual predators.\n\nWhile Epstein's self-incriminating statements are published (this week he told the Post \"the crime that was supposedly committed in Florida is not a crime in New York\" -- an interesting choice of words -- he continues to mock the law that applies to all other sex offenders who are found guilty of the same crime.\n\nEpstein served 13 months in the West Palm Beach Stockade and 18 months under community control (a rather permissive version of house arrest), for 2 Counts of Solicitation of Prostitution with a Minor.\n\nIn August of 2010, immediately following his release from \"community control\", Epstein returned to his $50 million East 71st Street town house given to him by his former client and long time friend Leslie Wexner.\n\nJust in the last few weeks he held a house warming dinner to celebrate his release from jail and reportedly invited television reporters Katie Couric, Charlie Rose, George Stephanopoulus and his close friend, HRH Prince Andrew, according to the NY Post.\n\nYou would think these professional television reporters would have done their homework prior to accepting his invitation no matter how desperate they were to rub elbows with Prince Andrew.\n\nAccording to a 53-page sealed indictment Epstein was facing 10 years to life on multiple counts of statutory rape, and child sex trafficking.\n\nCourt documents in that case claimed he routinely sought out girls as young as 14 and paid them $200 to $1,000 for sexually explicit massages in his homes in Palm Beach, Fla., and Manhattan.\n\nIn the New York sex-offender database, Epstein isn't registered under a zip code rather a \"name search\" option that does not list his New York address.\n\nThe reason for this is because Epstein's Upper East Side home is considered \"temporary\" and by NY state law, he is required to provide only his permanent address to the database.\n\nEpstein is currently listed under his Florida home even though he is no longer a Florida resident either (after his arrest he immediately became a US VI resident), but then again who's keeping count?\n\nOnce again these are mere technicalities when it comes to Epstein's sexual predator case. The two most disturbing parts of this story are that this could easily happen again and that once again there will be no justice.\n\nHad Epstein been a caring benefactor contributing to society and these young girl's education and well being then the world would have judged him differently.\n\nWhat he has done instead is the exact opposite -- causing enormous damage to hundreds of underage girls who could have been sponsored towards a better education.\n\nWith respect to Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance, I'm confused by his decision to allow this sexual predator to live at his Fifth Avenue house all this time (since August 2010), given his rather tough stance on gun control as witnessed by his testimony in Friday's NYPost when asked about a Florida driver cleared in a Manhattan weapon's charge, \"guns brought illegally into New York City\" he said, \" for any reason violate well established state laws and are a threat to our public safety\".\n\nThen wouldn't a registered sex offender living 500 feet from a park (Central Park where young girls congregate), and with resources to spare be an even more dangerous threat to society?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt_22679
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt
subject: Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff [MMIIII;", "Richard Barnnet", "LouellaRabuycll Januiz Banasiak [janusz53@me.com]", "Rich Kahn [IMMIMMIIIIMII;", "Darren Indyke", "Derby Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Francis"], "timestamp": "9/28/2012 2:41:02 PM", "subject": "Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "Lesley, \nPlease inform JEE, Vice President Biden is in West Palm Beach and is schedule to depart between 5pm and \n6pm today. He parks at Galaxy ramp also in Palm Beach. The airport will be closed between 5pm and 6pm. \nFlight time is 2+21min. \nwe'll need wheels up at 4pm or 2pm. Pls advise which time je prefers? \nThank you, \nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Larry", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabuyo", "Januiz Banasiak", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "Sep 28, 2012 10:33 AM", "subject": "3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "3E has moved wheels up to 3pm today! \nLArry, please confirm \nAlso, Larry please confirm you will organize pick up in PB upon the arrival today"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt_22691
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas RE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Ia little bit | don't think it will turn into romance | am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems\nintelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came\nthrough Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas EE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "alcoholic . drugs. unstable . consumate liar. CAREFUL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farka", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gosh I don't drink and I never did drugs"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031287.txt_22692
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031287.txt
subject:
  Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "Aug 16, 2016, at 10:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Darren:"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt_22698
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-landing-on-mars/?utm_term=.64eb9bf54e09"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "All show. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re: Re:", "body": "you told me you were worried about space and i told you not to worry, he will decimate climate change . and support, verifiable projects."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Kraus", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 12:27:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was never worried about space.. I always knew he was enamored with human space exploration because it is big and showy.. I even wrote that in print early on.. for him that is science.. it isn’t for those of us who know.. it is more bad news as far as I am concerned because this big budget will decimate real science.. 900 million cut in DOE office fo science will kill particle physics.. will end funding for me, for example.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029095.txt_22702
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029095.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when i told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure that doing good was going to be the goal\n\nhttps://ww.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.htm"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito <i@...>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i-)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did you talk to reid about the donor advised fund?"}, {"sender": "Joi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:16:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not yet. I will when I talk to him next - but not sure when that is.\n\nBTW, should be expecting funding yet or after we figure out the pitch?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt_22705
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt
subject: Fwd: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:47:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trump", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029982.txt_22718
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029982.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/1/2016 9:50:51 AM", "subject": "Imps ://www.theguardian. comius-news/20 1 6/1u1/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029903.txt_22719
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029903.txt
subject: Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 12:02:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ann Coulter", "recipients": ["Friend <a", "HumanEvents.com <r-smilbbqqlsnfcqqgvnrswzfrrbsfrffsqzpggvggfvzccqwisb@humaneventsmail.com>"], "timestamp": "March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST", "subject": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal’", "body": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal'\n\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and major Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nIn 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm Beach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor's mansion and asked to have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover investigation.\n\nThe police sifted through Epstein's garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the housemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt_22722
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:23:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "page and strokz"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon't follow your note. What texts"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey's chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI's personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Lisa will call.\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:33 AM -0500", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "?? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 9, 2018, at 6:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "WOW"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Goofy corrupt giveaways?\nDo tell."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 8, 2018, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "this bill has the things you were looking for in the last"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt_22737
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joichi Ito <joi@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry. it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy. at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver-sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:14", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "What is the size of the gift?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:25", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "100-200"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <joi@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 01:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt_22739
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt
subject: Re: World economy growth interesting reading
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem [sultanbinsulayem@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2009 11:37:00 AM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "mandelson is in london"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:15 PM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "* 11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA\nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET\n\n*How to tell when a real recovery begins.?\nBy Rick Newman\n\n*Obama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year.\nReuters\n\n11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA\nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET\n\nWhen times are tough, one thing that tends to raise the spirits is knowing that somebody else has it worse. And as wretched as the\nU.S. economy seems, it's not as bad as in other regions.\n\nThe International Monetary Fund's latest tally of world economic conditions forecasts a 2.6 decline in U.S. economic output for all of\n2009, and anemic growth of 0.8 percent in 2010. That's more optimistic than the IMF's prediction from three months ago, but those\nare still lousy numbers. A weak economy throughout 2010 would mean a bleak employment picture, an agonizingly slow housing\nrecovery, and another year or two likely to feel like a recession, whether it's technically labeled that or not.\nWe should count ourselves lucky, though. The IMF expects at least 11 major parts of the world to have more severe economic\ncontractions than the United State this year, including most of western Europe, Japan, Russia, and Mexico. Europe will still be\nstumbling along behind the United States next year, as well. Here are the IMF's projections for economic growth in various parts of\nthe world:\n\n2009. 2010\nChina. 75. 85\nIndia. 54 65\nMiddle East 2.0 3.7\nAfrica. 1.8 4.7\nBrazil. -1.3 2.5\nWorld total -1.4 2.5\nCanada. -2.3 1.6\nUS. -2.6 0.8\nFrance. -3.0 0.4\nSpain. -4.0 -0.8\nU.K. 4.2 0.2\n\nEU. -4.7 -0.1"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt_22747
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 10:12:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt_22756
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt
subject: Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner [paulkrassner@roadrunner.com]", "recipients": ["Nancy Cain", "S Viaric Moneysmith", "xy Steven Gaydos", "George Krassner", "Linda W. Grossman", "Holly Krassner Dawson", "Daniel Dawson", "Qanny Goldberg", "Cary Ratner", "Kevin Cright", "Vichael Sinmons", "Samuel Leff", "Bob Fass", "Lynnie Tofte Fass", "Lee Quarnstron inn", "Barb Cowles"], "timestamp": "1/16/2019 7:50:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 16, 2019 at 6:50:44 AM PST", "subject": "Re: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": "Hi Paul.\n\nThanks so much for sharing both your note to Steven and your latest Manson essay with me. It’s always wild to read that piece. I have parts of it memorized at this point.\n\nAfter reading your comment about vibes from the movie, I feel like I have some explaining to do. This is all stream of consciousness writing so take it on merit, I guess. No harm is meant.\n\nAs 'The Last of the Manson Girls' got closer to completion, I was insanely nervous about showing it to you. I knew it there was very little in it that was “Truth\" in terms of minute details. What I did was take the broad strokes of your essay and make it into the “beats” of my story.\n\nFor example, Sandy’s invitation to take a bath formed the spine of the “mermaid” scene. Squeaky’s line, “Manson never took anybody who wasn’t already discarded by the society\" formed the spin of the animated fever dream where she talks about her father. The visit to Merrick was a good place to get into some of my views about conspiracy and the human mind’s ability to latch on to anything to avoid unpleasant facts. Squeaky’s line “Well what do you expect from me. I’m crazy” was obviously later then this meeting, but it was just too good a line to let go.\n\nI didn’t use elements of your essay that made actual filming and production tougher. For example, the interlude in your essay where you went to a home of friend of the family and smoked weed for example became “you\" smoking weed at their pad.\n\nI added in beats, character traits and dialgoue that helped form that \"dramatic arc\" that works in movies so well. You and the Manson Women must have talked about far more than you mentioned in your essay, but I took liberties with what was said and how it was presented. Maybe I should have reached out to you about these conversations. I guess I was afraid of the Truth getting in the way of a good story."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt_22769
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2016 1:05:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/\n\nnot sure how trump wins without PA.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt_22771
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:28:14 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in \nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he \nhad been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been \nmanufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that \nis what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. \nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with \nhim. I think he is close to finishing up. \nDid you ever speak to him? \nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019302.txt_22779
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019302.txt
subject: Fw: Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels
messages:
  [{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What does this say???\n\nBegin forwarded message:\nFrom: Maria Luisa <>\nDate: July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT\nTo: Steve Bannon <>, Preate Alexandra <>\n<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2018 11:27:26 PM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between\nright-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who was\nDonald Trump's right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist\nviolence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast\nhimself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (II Movimento), right in the heart of Europe\nand its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the European\nelections which will be held in spring 2019.\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor of the\nDemocratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in support of\nNGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist right, accused of\nplots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in order to have labour at\nlow cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current Minister of the Interior Matteo\nSalvini.\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in the\nEuropean campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and Rome\n— is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great \"populist international\" of which he has long\nsince been dreaming.\nThe Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of strategic\nadvice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme European movements.\nAnalysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and channeling funding.\nThe aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of \"super group\" that if victorious can conquer up to a third\nof the European Parliament in the elections next May.\nIndeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own. The\nAmerican strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US Congress —\nand in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016 used data stolen from\nFacebook to try to influence the presidential election from which Donald Trump emerged victor. It is not\na mystery that for a long time he courts nationalists of the right from East to West. And he has already\nmet, among others, the Hungarian Orban, the French Marine Le Pen and the former leader of the British\nseparatists Nigel Farage. The latter reappeared, coincidentally, on Friday in Pennsylvania, USA, to a\nfundraiser in favor of the Republican congressman Lou Barletta. Without forgetting the Italians of Lega\nand 5 stars. Of them, he said: \"If it works in Italy, we can import the model anywhere\".\nThe Movement, which for now will count on a staff of 10 people, will be fully operational in 2019. In\nshort, after the American midterm elections, where Bannon is fighting to influence the primaries\nsupporting candidates potentially able to undermine the prospects of Republican establishment. But in the\nfuture the former spin doctor says he wants to spend more and more time in Europe. Also because the\nrelationships with Trump have worsened after the revelations he made to Michael Wolff and published in\nthe scandal book \"Fire and Fury\". \"Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Paradise,\" Bannon says now\nparaphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise. Hell in this case would\nbe the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The \"army of darkness\" is already among us."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033021.txt_22782
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033021.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 8:13:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030790.txt_22783
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030790.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "my assistant= also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in london. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he's got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to in russia id appreciate it. . dont know parties. ride to london . shes a futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 13:05", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "they are lost"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Let's show them the way - Baruch HaShem"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:14:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "they are in south of france for 2 weeks."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023292.txt_22785
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023292.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Po", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:20 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and\nyou and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing\nthe things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be\nhelpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per\nyear. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. , planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n\n. I wrote it to you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , asarule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\n\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with\nlittle direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyone would\nreport to him. Eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long shot my first choice as I\nprefer only being responsible and standing behind my own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer\nbe transmitted to reflect status stated by others )\n\nWith no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to\nthink through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you\nmight find very costly, very ! (however many structures available some risk sharing, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but\nwould require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure\nwhat role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Rich your controller\nstays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy\nGregory, I would suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be taken into\nconsideration.\n\nTODAY"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032229.txt_22795
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032229.txt
subject: Re: Heads up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2015 4:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that, when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Heads up", "body": "I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028875.txt_22800
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028875.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 9:12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031734.txt_22803
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031734.txt
subject: good and bad
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2017 3:54:45 PM", "subject": "good and bad", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nin a mixed state\n\non the up side 1 now have an excellent agent, am adding two chapters to my expanded memoir that deal with 1.\nmy first five famous papers and 2. my work on genetic conflict within ourselves; so there is a good chance i can\n\nsell the book by this summer to a publisher and start reaping some money off it\n\na friend at Cornell has now contacted me regarding a special senior fellowship they have and i remain hopeful\nthat i will soon be relaxing with the famously beautiful women of Aarhus by late September\n\non the downside, Jamaica is increasingly dangerous, murder rate climbing once again, about 6th highest in\nworld\n\nand i encounter a lot of racism, especially from young thugs—not so much hostility as disrespect—they regard\nme as an easy target—that old white man nah know nothing, we can rob him or do as we please\n\nyesterday morning at 7am very hostile encounter at an ATM machine, no overt attempt to rob me or i would\nhave shot him dead, just cursing me and my mother out because he had to wait an extra minute or two while i\ndid my transaction—all my Jamaican male friends agree that he would not have acted that way toward a dark-\n\nskinned man\n\nmakes me reluctant so spend so much time here or to continue to invest in my property\n\ni hope you are fine, the Trump bump in the market seems to have stalled and 1 would be curious what you\nthought of the market over the next three years—i will be forcibly retired July 1 but as long as 1 have\n‘employment' (equals fellowships at the moment) for a couple of years i need not spend my retirement money\nwhich will be roughly $900,000; at most i might put 450 grand in an annuity and keep the rest invested\n\nall the best\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019316.txt_22812
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019316.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between\nright-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who\nwas Donald Trump's right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the\nracist violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily\nBeast himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (II Movimento), right in the heart\nof Europe and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the\nEuropean elections which will be held in spring 2019.\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor of\nthe Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in support\nof NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist right,\naccused of plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in order to\nhave labour at low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current Minister of the\nInterior Matteo Salvini.\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in\nthe European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and\nRome — is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great \"populist international\" of which he\nhas long since been dreaming.\nThe Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of strategic\nadvice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme European\nmovements. Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and channeling\nfunding.\nThe aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of \"super group\" that if victorious can conquer up to a\nthird of the European Parliament in the elections next May.\nIndeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own. The\nAmerican strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US Congress\n— and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016 used data\nstolen from Facebook to try to influence the presidential election from which Donald Trump emerged\nvictor. It is not a mystery that for a long time he courts nationalists of the right from East to West.\nAnd he has already met, among others, the Hungarian Orban, the French Marine Le Pen and the\nformer leader of the British separatists Nigel Farage. The latter reappeared, coincidentally, on Friday\nin Pennsylvania, USA, to a fundraiser in favor of the Republican congressman Lou Barletta. Without\nforgetting the Italians of Lega and 5 stars. Of them, he said: \"If it works in Italy, we can import the\nmodel anywhere\".\nThe Movement, which for now will count on a staff of 10 people, will be fully operational in 2019. In\nshort, after the American midterm elections, where Bannon is fighting to influence the primaries\nsupporting candidates potentially able to undermine the prospects of Republican establishment. But in\nthe future the former spin doctor says he wants to spend more and more time in Europe. Also because\nthe relationships with Trump have worsened after the revelations he made to Michael Wolff and\npublished in the scandal book \"Fire and Fury\". \"Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Paradise,\"\nBannon says now paraphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise.\nHell in this case would be the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The \"army of darkness\" is\nalready among us."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you'll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn't work Lots and lots of\nface time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018 at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on\nones. however. you will have to come , stay 8 -10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the\nsame. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an\ninsider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage?.?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 11:07:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\nHow do I do that???\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- An Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his\ncareer because he gave a platform to a monster\nOfficially in Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030784.txt_22815
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030784.txt
subject: Re: What's up in trump World?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "3/7/2018 12:17:54 PM", "subject": "Re: What's up in trump World?", "body": "would you like to sit with bannon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:51 AM", "subject": "Re: What's up in trump World?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032913.txt_22816
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032913.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals ay"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 11:50:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in new york tomrow if you want to speak or ill see you tues"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032303.txt_22819
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032303.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Ihsofficel"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:32:18 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030974.txt_22820
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030974.txt
subject: Fwd: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump's 45 years in business were full of his \nshady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even \njuicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's \nperceived A -level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money \nlaunderers. What's more, Trump's own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain \nbillionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle \nschemes. Practically speaking, you couldn't miss him, as the Mueller investigation \nappeared to be finding. \nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal \ninvolving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach, \nFlorida for $36 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and \nTrump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade, \nwith Trump always hopeful that Epstein would provide some of his financial expertise to \nenabvle h8im to survive. Trump was beholden to Deutsch Bank and was on the hook \npersonally for 40 million dollars. \nEpstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues \ninvolved with moving the swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the \nhouse, an incredulous Epstein saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for \nthe property, buying it through an entity named Trump Properties LLC, ultimate owner \nunknown.. Trump, Epstein knew, had been in the buisness of leasing his name. Hotels are \nactually owned by others but renting the trump name would cost a percent or two. , \nTrump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate \ntransaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump's basic business model of \nlicensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein \nsuspected that others actually owned the new house. then getting extensive scrutiny in \nFlorida papers. The disagreement re the purchase of the house became all the more bitter \nwhen, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to \nTrump, who often visited with Epstein at his Palm Beach house, whose visits were \nconfirmed in depostions of Epsteins houseman. It appears that Epstein was visited almost \nevery day, by and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy \nendings—girls recruited, and who often returned to his house from the local massage \n \nparlors strip clubs, and, also, Trump's Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the \ntwo friends increased over the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by \nlocal Palm Beach police. Epstein's legal problems vastly escalated but the new Trump \nproperty, with only minor improvements, was bought 3 years later in 08 , the time \nTrump was facing his huge debt. for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. a Russain oligarch. \nThat is, Trump had either miraculously earned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or \nRybolovlev, or someone such as Rybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner \nunknown—$96 million, thereby providing a clean payment of $55 million to \nsomeone. This at the very same time that trump was into Deutsch bank for over 600 \nmillion dollars but with a 40 millino personal guarnatee .Rybolovlev might have, in effect, \npaid himself for the house, thereby cleansing the money. Epstein, on his part, would be \nsenetenced to 30 months, 12 of those months in jail on a prostitution charge. \nAfter the election, when Bannon was introduced to Epstein, Bannon told him, \"You were \nthe one person I was truly afraid of coming forward during the campaign.\" \n\"not surprising\" said Epstein."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:46:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FYI", "body": "first edit"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt_22825
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 8:41:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "gender difference. unlikely motivational. every cell is different. size is different.\n\nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human cell: the body the membrane. the organism the collections and interactions of brains. wisdom of crowds. mirroring. etc. money used as signals. as is spoken language. what does social behavior mean, it is the coordination of indiv brains.\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math, then political correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotional for me."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry, if I understand correctly you are suggesting there are layers 1 through N. lets call them L1 - Ln. there are times T1-Tn and then conjecture that changing the time correlations (by genetic switch or other method), you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. like telomeres for the cell, are their equivalents for the layers. as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get different (kill yourself if you are not being used instructions).\n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch up), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor development! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place.\n\nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more hunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, delayed gratification for agriculture etc.\n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communication. are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions.\n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social and cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and learn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, because it does not help people or yield social attention."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028604.txt_22826
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028604.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then | am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(| am in london tomorrow-friday but | assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won’t talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid iii", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025842.txt_22833
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025842.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think I should do it."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.txt_22838
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.txt
subject: Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness | Law News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 8:40:32 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness | Law News", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/trump-team-fires-back-after-jane-doe-refiles-rape-lawsuit-with-new-witness/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032471.txt_22849
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032471.txt
subject: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:16:03 PM", "subject": "A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT \ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I \nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and that \nI'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy Ruemmler. \nI need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. \nAre you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032317.txt_22851
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032317.txt
subject: RE: In NYC next week?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Attia"], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2016, at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": "no week after"}, {"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": ":("}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Attia"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:48 AM", "subject": "Re: In NYC next week?", "body": "I like sebastain, bottojm line , nothig to do, took some bloods."}, {"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 12:54:06 PM", "subject": "RE: In NYC next week?", "body": "a\n\nOk. Glad you were able to see him.\nPlease tell me it is officially over for trump..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023251.txt_22863
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023251.txt
subject: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the low end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <iii>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "sorry, I can call on thurs or sit face to face fri afternoon. . I will be in ny until monday morning.\ndecisions- questions good news . I have a really elegant solution for most of the following, 1 gift tax.\ncash or in kind. 2.1031. 3 fire drill brh traetc. 4. xxxx 5. 8865s.\ntax planing running out of time. . 7 restructure office. barry? brad told me he thought you had\nacknowledged high value this year. gift tax audit etc., . April, Oct. . returns. manage joslin , who is\nstill running your tax dept .\n\nyou and I need not rehash old postures, its tedious - I would ask that you tell me if you intend to pay\nfor the work that was done, and for the work you expect to be done, . thanks"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella - —COS@"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but I m encouraged and glad for\nyou. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before\nhim. what would you like me to tell Barry?\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work\nthat i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it\nagain if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very\nsame thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning\nthere was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was\nchosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes 1 personally\naugmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax,\n\nHe complained for over a year , re his direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was\nnot a surprise after months and moths of warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with\njohn and joe. He ran amok, and as i told you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you\ntold him that he works for you and not for me and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that i gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up\nquestions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _)\nbut somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when 1 told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the\ntask, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by\ntrying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his\nwork. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and\ncontinued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes , was also my doing , though\nemail after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your\nresponse was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan\nyou told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.txt_22866
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.txt
subject: Re: some questions...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM", "subject": "some questions...", "body": "Attached and below please find some initial questions for you...\nLooking forward to connecting over the next two days...\n1. Please provide a brief overview of your professional background?\n2. Who were your mentors? Do you keep in touch with any of them?\n3. What are your 5 best professional achievements?\n4. Who are some of your business partners?\nS. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf on the record?\n6. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf off the record?\n7. What business projects are you currently working on?\n8. What are your 5 best scientific achievements?\n9. What are you currently working on in the science field?\n10. What research institutions are you collaborating with?\n11. What past philanthropic causes are you most proud of?\n12. What philanthropic causes are you currently working on?\n13. What organizations are you collaborating with philanthropically?\n14. What upcoming events are you putting together or participating in?\n15. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your career?\n16. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your personal life?\n17. What are the top 10-15 misrepresentations of what actually happened?\n18. How are you specifically treated differently at home and abroad?\n19. Are there any outstanding legal challenges that you are facing?\n20. What are the other outstanding lawsuits that may draw publicity to your case?\n21. Is there anything else upcoming that may draw interest to your case?\n22. Have you agreed to any non-disclosures? Are there things you can't say about your case?\n23. Did you ever write an op-ed? Would you ever write an op-ed?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "Thoughts"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:52 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief. If there's any issues you'd like me to clarify with him or explore, lemme know. It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "Christie back in"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/8/2017 9:07:00 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "As...?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029283.txt_22867
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029283.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did you talk to reid about the donor advised fund?"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ":-)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when i told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure that\ndoing good was going to be the goal\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F05%2F31%2Fus%2Fobama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt_22872
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt
subject: Oil options
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nav Gupta", "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/", "Vinit Sahni/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust got off the phone with Vinit.\nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated I'd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and\nout.\n\nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given\nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is\nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show\nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from\nRussia. Germany gets 30%.\n\nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each\nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused\non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up.\n\nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est):\n\n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92\n\nand\n\n35d expiry 16april2014 underlying clk4 97.59\n\n** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM\n100 call for 25. Net pay 5cents. But 5d is a bit short for me.\n\n**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c\n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents."}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time we'll be much quicker.\nNav Gupta"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 2:24:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "Tam ona plane to and from tokyo tomorrow next 2-3 days, if u need something otherwise available 24/7 on +447703720599."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033358.txt_22884
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033358.txt
subject: "SNL": Baldwin's Trump, De Niro's Mueller season 44 finale cold open - Axios
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [ookahn@hbtkassociates.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2019 10:21:24 AM", "subject": "\"SNL\": Baldwin's Trump, De Niro's Mueller season 44 finale cold open - Axios", "body": "https://www.axios.com/snl-alec-baldwin-trump-dont-stop-me-now-60e0839e-68f5-4ce5-af36-8635dfcb694c.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt_22891
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt
subject: Re: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 7:38:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "- ask him for a financial proposal . Subject to\nMutually acceptable conditions"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, 27 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Unsatisfactory"}, {"sender": "\"Immelt, Stephen J.\"", "recipients": ["\"Kathy Ruemmler\""], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST", "subject": "RE: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\n\nWe will of course do this in whatever sequence makes sense for you. It goes without saying that any move\nwould need to make economic sense. My assumption has been that your comp would fall outside of our \"bell\ncurve\", but that is not an issue for us as long as the potential contribution also falls outside. You would not be\nthe only partner outside the curve, and I am comfortable with expanding that group for people who can\ngenuinely move the needle while embracing the culture that makes us who we are.\n\nOne benefit of having Michael in the mix is that he can provide a global perspective, and he would be\nimportant for explaining the case outside the US if we moved forward.\n\nJust let me know when and how you want to speak next.\nBest,\n\nSteve"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031091.txt_22895
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031091.txt
subject: Fwd: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago
messages:
  [{"sender": "Armando Fernandez, D.D.S. <armando@domain>", "recipients": ["Foley, Daniel", "John Noto", "Joy Toboroff"], "timestamp": "Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:53:54 -0400", "subject": "Fwd: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": "Get it"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["willie friedman", "jerry hirsh", "bawey morgan", "cdy-imi weiss", "peter", "ROBERT SAWYER"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:49:10 -0400", "subject": "[Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:28 PM", "subject": "Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": "Rod Blagojevich is the former Illinois Governor who tried to sell Obama's seat in congress.\n\nObama was asked, by the press, if he had ever met Gov. Ron Blagojevich.\n\nBarack Obama: \"I only saw Rod Blagojevich one time ... and that was in the stands and from"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt_22896
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2??? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 7:35:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023245.txt_22901
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023245.txt
subject: I know you have a lot on your mind.but..
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM", "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??! . I am concerned re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE . org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are all a part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced withnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! | this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note\n\n; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.\n\nI expect as a friend you will understand that\n\nI will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, ,no one. needs toend.. you and I had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge\n\nIf I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I hope you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with you , I find it very distasteful. . so to be clear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40 million per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement . 5 million every 2 months thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin if i am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say.\n\nsent to you JAN 29th 2016\n\nyou've agreed that Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their financial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt_22916
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt
subject: Re: Essays
messages:
  [{"sender": "Edward Rod Larsen [edlarsen@somewhere.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/30/2018 1:06:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "will do"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "essay 1. change next to the last sentence. Similarly. ....... to I look forward to accessing the cultural resources in New York in order that I may continue my cultural journey."}, {"sender": "Edward Red Larsen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM", "subject": "Essays", "body": "Essay 1.\n\nComing from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I believe that the international profile of NYU will provide the best environment for my college education, with the added benefit of returning to the place where I've spent most of my childhood and where my mother will be posted as Norwegian Ambassador to the UN in January 2019.\n\nNYU's Art History department appeals to me because of its wide range of courses, from the global art of antiquity to the contemporary. My passion is the Italian Renaissance and the rich history behind it, especially the works of 15th century masters such as Masaccio and Bellini. Some of the courses that NYU offers such as \"Early masters of Italian Renaissance painting\" and \"Florentine Villas: An Interpretation Based on Historical, Social Factors\" are, therefore appealing to me. What I find exciting, is not only the visual aesthetics and analysis of these masterpieces, but also the manner in which the Renaissance emphasised scientific and economic innovation, areas of study the Global Liberal Arts programme would offer. NYU's unique campus in Florence would give me a once in lifetime opportunity to spend a year immersing myself in the art, culture and history of Italy. This would be an exciting experience to have while studying for a Bachelor's degree in Art History, and would compliment my main interests in the subject.\n\nAs one of the prime cultural centres in the world, NYU's location in NYC ts the perfect place to broaden knowledge within contemporary art. Iam very much looking forward to visiting the Whitney Biennia this May. In addition the New museum, which shows a lot of the kind of work I find interesting is a short walk away from campus.\n\nTaking advantage of being based in central London for the past year, I have completed the Chairman's Programme at Christies, work experience at the Courtauld Gallery and I will be working at Maddox Gallery in the near future. Similarly, I want to take advantage of being based in NYC to gain as much experience as possible. I have chosen to apply Early Decision to NYU as it is the only American university I will be applying to, as there is no better place to obtain experience of the contemporary art world than New York City.\n\nEssay 2.\n\nFrom the age of extremes to the age of bewilderment\n\nWhat captivates me more than anything else is the different ideological phases of the 20th century and how art can be used as a tool of advancement and reflection on ideological and political developments.\n\nMy fascination began when I read; Eric Hobsbawm's \"Age Of Extremes\" and has since developed through books such as Benjamin Carter Hett's \"The Death Of Democracy\" and Yuval Harari \"A Brief History Of Tomorrow\" and \"21 Lessons For The 21st Century\"."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt_22919
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt
subject: Re: B727 deal
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/12/2013 9:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "I spoke to my FAA in Orlando, it will take the buyer 6 months to obtain a FAR125 certificate if we do not include ours,\nDarren and Rich are working on possibility of including JEGE, INC with sale of Boeing, this will be valuable to buyer and\nprove to be beneficial monetarily to you if we can include the company name in the sale. FAA informs me its taken\n\nunder into consideration on a case by case basis if they will approve another buyer to operate my FAR125 certificate. My\nFAA inspector did mention that Trump did the same deal when he purchased his B757, it included the manuals and\ncompany."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 3:37 pm", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "ok to all"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI spoke to Gary and he agrees to make a counter offer, do you agree with the following:\n\n-Counter the offer at $2.750M\n\n-deal to include my FAR125 certificate, along with the company name: JEGE, Inc. this provides the buyer with ease of\ntransition and keeps the B727 on its current FAR125, tremendous value to buyer,.\n\n-Buyer understands purchase is \"As Is\" but has the opportunity to visually inspect the aircraft in Palm Bch along with my\nrecords.\n\n-closing to be on December 30th 2013.\n\n-Buyer will pay round trip repositioning expense Brunswick GA to Palm Beach and return to Brunswick if buyer declines\nthe aircraft (fuel cost round trip $14,930.00).\n\n-Seller will deduct the reposition expense if buyer proceeds with purchase. (fuel expense to fly B727 to Palm Beach is\n$7,465.00).\n\nis this approved?\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029558.txt_22933
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029558.txt
subject: After Words
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 8:21:27 AM", "subject": "After Words", "body": "Dear Friends, \nI wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book 'After Words'. He truly is \nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was \nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. I will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read. \nI trust this email finds you well. \nKindest regards \nKatherine X \nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt_22940
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt
subject:
  Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 1:43:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement_of Senator Barack Obama _on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales_for Attorney General\n\nSent from my iPad"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025895.txt_22954
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025895.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bad news. We decided not to go. I was invited to talk at the Parliament, but what can one say? That aside, they’ve got plenty of people giving them bad advice."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky <q>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad for them , good for you. no need to have only one currency, its old fashioned. . you are of course welcome to use apt in new york with your new leisure time, or visit new Mexico again.\n\nants find the shortest route to food, by trying many and discarding what doesn't work, no algorithm. , no input or output , only a goal. . sounds closer to our probem"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "There were plenty of warnings about one currency. Not heeded, unfortunately.\n\nAppreciate the invitation, but leisure time? Is that an English phrase?\n\nOK for ants, but don’t see how it helps us.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 07, 2015 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "ants and evolution work by trying things and finding the best solution. math and physics works by algorithms. Im suggesting that maybe just as a child sends out many connections and then discards the unused might be a better template for biological thinking."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023279.txt_22959
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023279.txt
subject: Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <richard.joslin@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Melanie Spinella <\nas areflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? ))::\nin the beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to\neat the apple from the knowledge tree)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <i Brad Wechsler ie . Heather Gray", "a -"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office", "body": "sorry but this is emblematic of the silliness that appears to continue. ..... 1. How can we ask for a legal\nopinion when it is crystal clear that we don't yet have accurate facts or numbers ,f. 2 Invoices have not\nbeen reviewed! corporate structure is convoluted and unexplored in detail. ( was the boat captain on the\ncall?) 3 Paul weiss is the attny , and should be charged with getting us info. . 4. Bringing in yet another\noutside lawyer without full vetting and consideration, a waste of time energy and money. .5. ex. what is\nthe location of charters shown on the invoice? do you know. .? if th invoices are incorrect, does that\ngive us any comfort in trying to defend an audit. . I saw three invoices only, and each had a different\nowner or address .."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt_22962
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:51:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not a good time"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in de today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "rison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt_22964
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Didn’t know. Meaning of the rest note?\n\nMahler’s 5th opens with the same rhythmic motif (but 4th note is the same as the first three, not lower as in\nBeethoven’s) - Mahler’s Sth is my favorite symphony."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "its not baba ba- bah. its regular (ba) bababa- bah. regular four eighth notes , but the first is not\nsounded . changes the whole dynamic and wildly misunderstood"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I almost get it..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun (transient) with Trump-China:\n\n'What China Thinks of President-Elect Trump” broadcast on CCTV News, discussion with former Chinese\nambassador to U.S. and head of Chinese Association of American studies - streamed -\nhttp://english.cntv.cn/2016/11/13/VIDEytqd1tlf30eFnd6vTIxy161113.shtml\n\nInterview - http://www.atimes.com/article/china-wants-build-relations-dealmaker-trump/\n\nMore fun (enduring) with Closer To Truth; working new episodes from FQXi conference (e.g., “Physics of the\n\n99 66\n\nObserver”, “Physics of Consciousness”, “Quantum Cosmology of the Beginning?”, Philosophy of\nCosmology\"); progressing on “Sleep & Dreams”.\n\nIn LA for 2 weeks, then back to China; NY in January. You there then?\nLove to get your sense of Trump’s administration, policies.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn Pe"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 4:35:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "there are no policies yet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt_22969
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt
subject: RE: Boeing
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sean J. Lancaster", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 7:28:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Boeing", "body": "I was told it was going for part out by Wendy ? I don't know this buyer you describe\nBest regards,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total,..\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,.\nthx,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt_22971
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 11:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will ask, get back to you tomorw"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi \nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon, email you after. how much \nfun"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think.. and if peace agreement \nwas signed in kuwait that would be 414141414141e"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you going to Saudi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 6:45:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no i will be in dubai"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt_22986
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt
subject: Re: IMPORTANT
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Steven Gaydos"], "timestamp": "3/30/2019 4:23:32 AM", "subject": "Re: IMPORTANT", "body": "THE LAST LAUGH \nSarah Silverman on Al \nFranken, Louis C.K., Losing \nHer Hulu Show and More \nIn the premiere episode of 'The Last Laugh' podcast, Sarah Silverman speaks out for the first \ntime about her Hulu show's cancelation and goes to bat for her friend Al Franken. \nMatt Wilstein  \n03.26.19 4:12 AM ET \nPhoto Illustration by The Daily Beast/Getty \nSubscribe to The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts \nWearing a rainbow-striped hoodie and a \"Beer Nuts\" baseball cap, Sarah Silverman strode into our \nBurbank recording studio ready to talk. \nIt had been just a few weeks since Hulu had unceremoniously canceled her weekly show I Love You,  \nAmerica and the comedian's emotions were still a bit raw. But her unflappable sense of humor was \nfully intact as she recounted to me how she found out the bad news and ended up revealing more than \never before about how the streaming service treated her over the past year. \nDuring our long conversation for the first-ever episode of my new podcast The Last Laugh, Silverman \nalso spoke frankly about what it has been like to see her friend Al Franken accused of alleged sexual  \nmisconduct and attempted to clarify the controversial comments she made to Howard Stern about \nLouis C.K. She reflected on some of her most iconic roles and looked ahead to what comes next. \nHighlights from the interview are below and you can listen to the whole thing right now by subscribing \nto The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts, the Himalaya app or wherever you listen to podcasts. \nOn the 'heartbreaking' cancelation of I Love You, America \n\"It came as a surprise. We were so sure we were getting picked up. We're all super bummed about it. I \nknow that they did love the show, but I think what it cost compared to its popularity or the eyes that \nthey had on it didn't___you know, the people that make the decisions there don't have any connection to \nthe show. And it is just so heartbreaking because I kind offeel cut off at the knees.\" \nOn the 'bullshit' allegations against Al Franken \n\"I can only just be honest and say, if I didn't know Al Franken, I'd probably be like yeah, go girl, me \ntoo, fuck that shit. Because I do know him, I don't feel that way. So maybe I'm too close to it and just \nseeing the dots not the big picture. But I just can't believe it. The U.S.O. thing is bullshit and if you \nwatch the sketch they did, give me a fucking break. He may be guilty of doing pedestrian comedy, I \nguess, but he apologized and she accepted his apology. But it does seem that the Republican Party \nand I don't think this is something to emulate at all___doesn't apologize, denies everything, admits \nnothing and everyone keeps their job. And I hate that that's what we teach our children. But if you \napologize and say, 'I want there to be an ethics investigation on me and I want to do everything by the \nbook, this is my truth but I'm open to [the fact] that these women felt this way, I want to make this \nright,' I don't know why that person then loses their job.\"\nOn looking like an 'asshole' after commenting on Louis C.K. \n\"My experience with Louis as a teenager perhaps informs his pathology a bit. But in no way is it \nanalogous to crimes, to assaults, he subsequently committed that mirror it, that come from it. I was just \nspeaking about my own experience. And the headline was, 'He jerked off in front of me and I didn't \ncare.' And that's so cold and insulting and awful to the women who were hurt by his actions. So if you \nclicked on it, they quoted me. But if you didn't, and nobody does, it just makes me look like an asshole. \nAnd me looking like an asshole is the least of it. It hurt people and there was stuff that I said that I \ndon't think I was articulating the spirit of what I meant.\"\nOn performing stand-up about being single without sounding \n'hacky' \n\"It's such an '80s comedienne premise, but then it was also my truth so I was trying to reconcile with \nit. It's hard to not be meta about it, because just to say 'I'm single' on stage. There's something that \nfeels so inherently hacky about it that I feel like I have these guilt pangs and then it just becomes a \nwhole other bit. It's always weird to navigate. I've always been in relationships for big chunks of time \nand every time I come out I'm like a generation older and I don't know what my station is.\"\nNext week on The Last Laugh podcast: Arrested Development and Veep star Tony Hale."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt_22988
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt
subject: Trump Calls Non-White Countries "S**tholes": The Daily Show
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/13/2018 11:29:05 PM", "subject": "Trump Calls Non-White Countries \"S**tholes\": The Daily Show", "body": "https://youtu.be/OQkfDJ2ZVNo"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt_22989
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt_22991
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 29, 2016 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's connect 2PM\n\nFaceTime is easier as I will be out\nI've known Marla since those days\nHaving lunch with her\n\nShe seems v troubled right now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no -imean her friend was stealing her high heels cutting the backs of the shoes open and fucking the shoe..\nits a funny story."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fascinating !"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-07-16/news/9203040348 _1_pairs-of-maples-shoes-marla-maples-\ntrump-parc"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2016 1:12:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Roman poet whose name I forget - \" Nothing human is foreign to me.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021812.txt_22994
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021812.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?\n\nOn Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, a vote:\n\nDefinitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend HB day and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt_23001
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.\n\nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.\n\nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start up is running out of money.\n\nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\n\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:29:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt_23005
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Rican", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 12:24:49 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt_23006
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt_23015
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt
subject: humor and trump and evolutionary logic
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation article on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer https://www.thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-laugh/ congratulations Robert John and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt_23021
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yikes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2016, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/15/2016 1:38:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's a broad question."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt_23023
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt
subject: TSA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:52:39 PM", "subject": "TSA", "body": "TSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm„ \nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm,? \nIs 2:30pm ok for departure„ \nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm \nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok? \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt_23028
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt
subject: Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:07 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me nw"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I got it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Here is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt_23031
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Here we go"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/19/2017 10:45:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "soo crazy."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt_23037
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What do u hope?))"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "16 Nov 2016, at 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope"}, {"sender": "I", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hey Jeffrey!!\nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not?\n\nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling to NY\noften to see him and can catch up with you..\n\nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-)\n\nHugs,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt_23048
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt
subject: Fwd: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indivig"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The book on you...", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <landon.thomas@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in\nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he\nhad been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been\nmanufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. Iam sure\nthat is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with\nhim. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?\n\nhttp: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde\nx.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023325.txt_23053
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023325.txt
subject: I know you have a lot on your mind.but..
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in your collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. I understand your desire to modifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show you, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I vigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work... you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a reaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint over it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\n\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me ,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea . Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella as"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM", "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "sent to you JAN 29th 2016\n\nyou've agreed that Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their financial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad document after another for over a year , no getting away from it,, bad cashflows nonewIT, each time with \" its gettting better\" no in fact -!itsnot. - the excuse, that Brad is not the numbers guy, is ludicrous. of course he didnt actually prepare the statements. - no ceo would ,- but over and over he presented them to you and me, after , holding them back for his personal review multiple times and after multiple drafts. weeks of his editing, the consistant but \"inexplicable \"missing the obvious serious errors .( gaming ) inaccuracies, ( cashflow ) and mistakes (tax returns). why, ?! the simple answer is that at best, he is ac minus, (note. I, like you ,also give points for effort. )-! an elegant art partnership gone fallow. ??!!I and its core reason to exist. not used ? no docs for plane?, still! why? no docs for decantings why? the docs for deal | received last night , \"no docs at all for deal 2, the biggest \". why wasn't Tom brought in, after 4 times of my incessant reminders your admonition etc. the trading accounts ?\n\nBarry Cohen is great. more like him please .\n you asked ,- I did my best trying to train your brad chosen people in the face of my telling you that they were never going to be more than c-minuses, thousands of emails thousands? _ Brad at its head . you can't asa ceo, have an accountant give you multiple pages with the most important numbers missing altogether and not notice, you and IJ saw the errrors right away ,as did my very junior bookeeper after only a cursory glance. He told me he didnt know the details of his note? ! , my guess is that he wanted to pay less. no more than that, any other story is blather. its silly. Talk to richard yourself.\n re your estate. Yes another Brad issue - your will, needs revision. the tenants in common structure I assume Alan has carefully walked you through. it is way overdue, needed and exciting. I won't list the more serious issues in an email but we can speak over the weekend.\n How can IT help? We agreed at the time when you hired Castrucci , that when you fired him, I would bear no responsibility"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin ifi am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt_23057
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt
subject: Re: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel [aseckel@yahoo.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:20:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "you can call as i am obviously up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then \nanother 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article \nleft on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to \nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on \na daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the \ntop. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to \nthis day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did \nmanage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it \nprominent. \n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now \nremoved. \n\nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head \nlines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, \nPromotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki \nentry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing \nand wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now \nhas an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. \n\nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google \nsearch. \n\nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. \n\nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, \nespecially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add \nnew content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped \ndown (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push \nHuffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google \nsearch are not of your mug shot, etc. \n\nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to \ndepromote you. \n\nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you \nhave no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and \nyou stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work \nhas been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and \nsupervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to \nknow what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not \nallowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. \n\nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 \nbalance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and \nif you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. \n\nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 \nvery toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt_23060
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt
subject: Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2016 8:29:50 AM", "subject": "Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.cozen.com/cozendocs/7-Trump-Administration-Policies-Affecting-Businesses/#_home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030141.txt_23065
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030141.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2019, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think trump has the power to declare a national emergency to build the wall?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmle", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/2/2019 12:56:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it. Quinn offered a $2 mm signing bonus today. I said not leaving Latham."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt_23066
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? wheredo you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure | follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:30:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. | recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven’t heard back from him. | think | talked him out of automating the divans. | agreed with what you said about that."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028957.txt_23070
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028957.txt
subject: following up: WA poetry release
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 3:33:09 PM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education.\nShe's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years\nago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we\n\nwould love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1jjxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basict+Clipt+fort+Viewing.mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed\nconversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\n\nAl Gore\n\nJohn McCain\n\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\n\nMayor Tom Menino\n\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\n\nSir Mervyn King\n\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under\nway to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United\nStates and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television\nseries we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a\nseries of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and\nfor their students.\n\nLet us know if Woody Allen might be open to our sending another release form his way. Of course, if he's\ninterested in releasing the footage for only certain parts of our project, we're open to having a conversation\nabout that, too.\n\nThank you, and I hope to meet you soon.\n\nBest, Leah"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt_23071
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt
subject: Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2011 7:42:56 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 23, 2011 3:37:46 PM EDT", "subject": "1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Dear Friend,\n\nBoth Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin celebrates its 1st anniversary this week. As the\nonly 2 sides/2 women show on national radio, we've grown from 16 stations in May of\n2010 to 110 now.\n\nArianna and Mary find consensus that, contrary to the Washington and media\nconventional wisdom, the Jobs Agenda is more urgent than the Deficit Agenda (\"if people\nonly read about shark attacks, they'll worry about shark attacks,\" says Arianna). And they\nagree that there’s an apparent outbreak of men abusing the help -- Strauss-Kahn,\nSchwarzenegger, Ensign. To paraphase Freud, what do men want?\n\nBut there’s sharp disagreement about whether Rep. Ryan walked into Obama's trap by\nproposing to end Medicare in 10 years. Will the special election this Tuesday in Jack\nKemp's old seat produce a Democratic \"Scott Brown Moment\"?\n\nTo read the show summary and listen, http:/Awww.huffingtonpost.com/huff-radio/both-\nsides-now-1ist-annive b 865325.html\n\nBest,\nMark Green\nHost"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt_23077
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LY", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2017 12:38:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "The inauguration was amazing! And in one day, Trump got more fat women walking than Michelle did in 8 years @)..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt_23080
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/25/2017 1:02:58 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Reid mentioned along with Ted Olson, one or two others as potential add’l lawyers for Trump in today’s Law 360"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt_23081
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers as\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\nmii says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed {J to copy her.\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant fF P|\nand Mr Epstein."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg <>", "Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt_23083
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that\nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:34:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "maybe as a favor to trump. in exchange for yemen and iran support.\n\nsmells doesnt it?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028943.txt_23094
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028943.txt
subject: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 3:17:58 PM", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMay | drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice\nabout my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in\nAmerica? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a\nmessage just for you....\n\n-Lisa\n\nThat you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose\nsupport— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to\nrealize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to\nproduce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of\nhumanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and informal,\nonline and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to\n\nbegin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work.\n\nWhether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker’s Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal\nsponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an elusive\nfriend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or provided\novernight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you highlighted\nour work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors; whether you\nflew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or asked your children’s\nschool to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation to take an interest in the\nproject, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of finance, or of distribution; whether\nyou praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you enabled what we have done.\n\nHere’s what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak peeks\nof works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects.\n\n° The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-\nproduction between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new\nproduction company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring Bill\nClinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez _on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl Sandburg,\nKatie Couric on Elizabeth Bishop, Nas on Whitman, and many more scheduled for nationwide launch\nin 2017.\n\ne Poetry in America’s many initiatives to reach Middle and High School teachers and their\nstudents are taking root. Our first online course for Middle and High School Teachers, Poetry of\nthe City, will launch this Spring with the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Companion\nmaterials to this course will be made available for free on PBS LearningMedia. This course is\ndesigned to meet the needs of English Language Arts and Social Studies teachers in the US and\ninternationally."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023331.txt_23103
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023331.txt
subject: so there is no misunderstanding
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spincll iit"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "so there is no misunderstanding", "body": "sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note ; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more. I expect as a friend you will understand that I will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, , no one. needs toend.. you and I had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge If I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I hope you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with you , I find it very distasteful. . soto be clear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40 million per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement . 5 million every 2 months thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin ifi am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say. Ihave told the brads and barry,- Iam done. its not a negotiation , out !!- fyi given my carlyn joslin castrucci, admonishments,- though my involvement in those - in one instance only gave a name - in another only given an eileen dictated choice btween two 250k preparers. and for castrucci, I actually sent emails that i take no responsiblity for his being hired. - however you felt strongly that I should be saddled with their outcomes .even with brad wechsler , 1 again said two months in, Leon, he doesnt get it. I tell you this so that you will understand that I will not interview, recommend or vet any new hire. A story - In 1993 trump and I had a friend that kept telling his pilots how to fly , and when to fly , he couldnt help himself from hiring morons as co pilots, and maintenance people based on cheapest rates. Donald and I tried and tried to talk some sense into him, to no avail. Donald and I were in aspen, sitting at little nells. when the friends plane crashed into the side of aspen mountain , klliing him and all on board,- Trump looked at me and said without a blink , I guess NOW he wishes he would have listened to us.- a metaphor for your office.. . had we not waited to the very last hour having had a six month window and tens of unasnwered text and emails re decisions needed including the 1031. you would have saved way more than you often feel obliged to argue about. . silly buti reallize you are stressed. Barry will need to sit with brad for months, to absorb all the co's , structures. cash flow, financial statments etc. I will present barry my thoughts on the overall redo _, it will be the exact same email that 1 presented to you and brad two years.ago . accurate numbers first. and foremost. .( last week gaming report stil funky). IT ete I pointed out some of the more glaring errors to barry to give him a flavor of what is to come. Tuesday if you like we should discuss Giacometti , and pesner . difficult to finesse him if they are filing documents that you won't. these ridiculous conversations with tons of people on the phone , removes any claim you might have to not be considered a WILLFUL NON-FILER . ( after youve been told by attnys"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031795.txt_23104
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031795.txt
subject: Re: 11111
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 6:45:14 PM", "subject": "Re: 11111", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM", "subject": "Re: 11111", "body": "Here we go again.... \nhttp://www.politico.com/story/2o17/o2/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235o96"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt_23106
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt
subject: Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:46:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "attached are equity healthcare ideas"}, {"sender": "Ens, Ananda", "recipients": ["Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 10:59:39 AM EST", "subject": "US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "The US team is out with their 2017 Year Ahead this morning (top pick into the new year.\n\nink) running through ALL sub-sectors with each analysts\n\nTop Picks — ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA\n\nWashington DC Backdrop\n\nGiven the clean sweep by the GOP & uncertainty around the ACA, key attention is paid by Andy Bressler to a review of\nthe various scenarios that could play out early next year. With a repeal likely to happen well before a replace\n(essentially via the Budget Reconciliation process in Jan/Feb), Andy notes this is likely to include a repeal of both\nhealth insurance exchange subsidies & a phase-down of Medicaid expansion funding (albeit with a two or three year\ntransition period).\n\nHe also expects a repeal of many of the larger HC related taxes in the ACA, including the HIX ($14.3bn in 2018),\nMedtech Tax (2.3%), pharma industry tax ($4.1bn in 2018) & Cadillac tax (effective 2020).\n\nAs for the views by analysts...\nBiotech (+) — believe sector will outperform largely as pricing risk has diminished (although will remain in pockets) but\npipelines/growth remains. Ying’s top picks are CELG & REGN; Tazeen’s top picks are ACAD & RARE.\n\nSpec Pharma (-) — headwinds remain w/ Sumant’s top pick AGN given lower risk to reimbursement pressures & an\nunderappreciated pipeline. Leverage & CF remain the key focus for investors.\n\nTools/Animal Health (=) — Derik notes more “headline” than “real” risks from policy which will create opportunities for a\ngroup growing MSD, although valuations remain above peers. DHR (US 1 name) top pick, also A, ZTS in Animal\nHealth, BDX in Diagnostics & CTLT in Services.\n\nMedtech (=) — Hopkins’ expects a mixed bag in 2017 w/ stocks trading close to 5yr valuation lows; EW top pick given\nbest growth / purest innovation story."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt_23107
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt
subject: Re: Marilyn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be assayay andI, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate\nBrianna’s 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should\nhave Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morming?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 7:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "what apt is | | staying in. call david mitchell , put her at the life hotel instead. for tonight if they have\nroom."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 12:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "I had iii in apartment 3M. I will ask David about a room for tonight instead"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt_23110
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the nuclear issue is the wrong strategy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023319.txt_23118
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023319.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "As i said yesterday, pointing out places where i think my friend might be taking unnecesarry risks has become tedious and trying. Structures that have been set up 2 years ago. were done so to give you protection and flexibility, NOT FOR ME< for YOU _ they required hiring stafff that could manage these complex entities. you told me over the past two years that as i set them up i should be responsible for their operation. That was never the deal , never. I have heard after -care etc for quite a while. in dec when you unilaterially decided to pay me much less than our agreed amount , we agreed NO MORE money discussions NO MORE after care. The silliness has reached its pinnacle when you suggest i am responsible for the lack of sophisticaiton and thoughtfulness of the 1031 transactions that NO one even told me about. asked my advice or gave me any notice at all before the fact. same as the structure for the CAlifhouse. I would remind you , though Heather is great, it was not she that modified the gagosian contract to give you the protection that resulted in your having no liablity, though you tell me she has done these things many times. 3. Remind me to talk to you about MR"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. atleast 18 months late , but Im encouraged and glad for you. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before him. what would you like me to tell Barry? There is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work that i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it again if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning there was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was chosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes 1 personally augmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax, | He complained for over a year , re his"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, 7 Apr 2018 at 07:54", "subject": null, "body": "no concrete progress. for a year. sorry, it cannot go on this way"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11:21 PM (13 hours ago)", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI created applications one week ago at NDCAS ( doctor of naturopathic medicine centralized application service ) and VMCAS ( veterinary medical college application service ) ,working on my application material , requesting evaluations letters and etc.\n\nOn Tuesday I am going to the job interview, working on my resume today .\n\nP.s.- I hope I will get finally the results from Chinese proficiency exam today /tomorrow."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "anything else by far in your collection at a cost less than agreed upon. . please also remember that you andi agreed no more demands on my time after the last payment for the big transaction. OR, you can decide that brad , tom , and whomever else you choose can screw with my work and they can oversee your audits. they are both aware and sensitive to the issue at hand. alan could be brought in but i would be extra careful having paul weiss given access to entire story.\n\n_-On an unrelated note- you recently seemed shy to discuss certain things. , please be assured I make no judgement on any of your activities , whether or not i agree with them . not my role I am always on your side on the table. I hope your personal life quiets. you ‘ve had a rough 15 months."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt_23129
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt
subject: Trump’s conflict web
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2016 7:43:45 PM", "subject": "Trump’s conflict web", "body": "http://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/trumps-conflict-web/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt_23132
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:21:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won’t take long to do. We’re just swamped. I’ll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn’t be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt_23135
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/10/17 5:12 PM", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail. \nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it. \nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes. \nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time. \nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement. \nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time. \nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish: \n[...incidents and miscellaneous facts detailed...]\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach you. \nThanks, \nPeter Aldhous"}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous <111'>", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss, \nSince sending the note below, we have heard from the Australian National University. They informed us: \n\"The characterisation by Professor Krauss that The Australian National University (ANU) found the complaint to be 'unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent' is false.\" \nThey also told us that you resigned your honorary appointment at ANU on November 3. Can you comment on the reason for your resignation from ANU? \nI would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you. Again, we are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time. Please provide any comments you wish us to consider before then. \nSincerely, \nPeter Aldhous"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter Aldhous"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:34:49 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Hello Peter. I am currently on a plane. I sent you earlier from the plane an email response to your letter, which I hope you received. Regarding your note below: My earlier remark to you was based on my correspondence with the universities during and after the investigation, and the conclusion I drew from the ANU report, which I quoted for you in my response to your note. The claims made in the allegation which were later demonstrated to be false, or which were then not supported after repeated requests from the University to substantiate the claim, provided evidence that the claim was fabricated (as I knew it must be), and therefore maliciously so. \nI had been planning on resigning my honorary appointment at ANU before I received the original letter from ANU because my wife had moved to the US several years ago, and I no longer visited the University regularly to work with colleagues there as I did in earlier years. When I received the letter from ANU regarding the complaint, I decided to wait to resign my appointment until the investigation was completed and the complaint was dismissed. After it was, I sent my note of resignation in, and I note that upon its receipt the Dean he suggested I remain on until my appointment expired at the end of this year, but as I had made my decision to resign earlier I felt no need to wait until then. I received a very nice note from the director of the unit I work with (who was made aware of the complaint and its resolution by the Dean) who expressed thanks for my many contributions to the University while there, and my interactions with staff, students, and faculty there. \nI hope this clarifies your issues. \nLMK"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019106.txt_23137
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019106.txt
subject:
  RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke [mailt", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Irena enreaarern eee rere eee re ern eee rare en eR one ee renee rn eR ree ee en ere ee ee Te rere Teer\n\nThanks,\nRegards,"}, {"sender": "Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Darren:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt_23146
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt
subject: Re: deja' vu' by pk
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM", "subject": "Re: deja' vu' by pk", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM", "subject": "Re: deja' vu' by pk", "body": "Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit\nI shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long\nnurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation's direction is interpreted as an extension\nof the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.\nWithout going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of\na conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator\nAlan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then\n13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would\nbe confirmed.\nThe conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the\nmembers of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an\nappropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas\nwould then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a\njocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill's allegations.\nSenator Simpson was saying, \"Y'know, Clarence, I've seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time,\nbut I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.\"\n\"I'll never forget it,\" Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. \"They were in a barn. Except\nthat the inside of the barn was like a theater.\"\nSenator Hatch interjected, \"Summer stock, eh? No pun intended\"\n\"There was a stage at one end,\" Judge Thomas continued his description, \"and the stage was facing rows\nand rows of wooden folding chairs. There were haystacks piled up on the stage, and in front of the haystacks\nthere was a beautiful, buxom, blond woman—and a donkey. Well, the woman began disrobing and she started\nstroking the donkey to arousal.\"\n\"Doesn't sound at all sleazy to me,\" Senator Simpson said.\n\"Actually, it had Beethoven piano sonatas playing in the background,\" Judge Thomas said. \"Well, when\nthe woman was fully disrobed and the donkey was fully aroused, they began copulating, right there in front of\nthose haystacks on the stage of that barn. Slow and sensual. Then bumping and grinding away, accompanied by\npassionate moans and wild braying. You've never seen a sight like this, I promise. And then the camera panned\nslowly toward the audience . . . and the audience consisted entirely of donkeys.\"\nThe Senate office shook with raucous laughter, especially that of Judge Thomas. His booming guffaws\nrang like huge gongs in a church belfry. And, I must admit, I had to suppress my own laughter. I had been totally\ncaught by surprise, but I appreciated getting the insight. Homo sapiens is, in reality, the only species that has a\nneed for pornography.\nWhen the group's laughter finally began to simmer down, Senator Hatch said, \"I suppose that movie was\none of the demands of the animal rights people.\"\n\"That's correct,\" Senator Simpson added. \"Saving animals' lives is no longer enough. They need culture.\"\nI felt like I was imprisoned in the boys' locker room, but I was getting ready to force myself to leave\nanyway, and it would have ended right there for me if the subject matter hadn't returned to Anita Hill.\n\"I'm glad nobody considered calling her to testify against me, even for a closed-door session,\" Judge\nThomas said. \"But you fellas will really love this. Anita Hill was a very opinionated young lady. Actually, she\nand I once had an extremely animated discussion on the decriminalization of abortion. Can you imagine what\nthe Democrats would've done with that?\"\nAnd that was the precise instant I made the decision to leak Professor Hill's statement to the press. Although\nI have constantly been sexually hassled, I have never really been harassed in the legal sense of the word.\nHowever, I have had an abortion, and I was totally outraged by the blatant hypocrisy I'd overheard. I had never\nleaked a document before, but my anger overshadowed my fear.\nI chose Nina Totenberg because I had come to trust her reporting about the Supreme Court on National\nPublic Radio. I honestly had no idea what leaking the affidavit would accomplish. I certainly did not envision\nthat it would literally embarrass the Senate into delaying the vote until public hearings were held, though that\nprobably was my secret desire.\nBut Judge Thomas testified under oath that he had never discussed the subject of abortion. However, in\nresponse to a question by Senator Hank Brown, Professor Hill testified that she had disagreed with Judge Thomas\nin a discussion about Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately, then-Senator Joseph Biden quickly interrupted her.\n\"That is not the subject of these hearings,\" he said.\nPersonally, I feel quite disappointed about that particular aspect of the testimony, but I have not the slightest\nregret over leaking Anita Hill's affidavit, and I would gladly do it all over again.\nI certainly set a higher moral standard for myself than did the staffer for Senator John Danforth who wrote\nJudge Thomas's statement that began, \"Nobody helped me with this.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt_23150
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt
subject: Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [a", "recipients": ["‘jeffrey E.' [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2017 2:07:16 PM", "subject": "Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque", "body": "Jeffrey --I thought you might be interested in this article-- Nick\n\nTrump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash\n\nPresident-elect Donald Trump rang in the new year together with Joseph \"Joey No Socks\" Cinque — a\nconvicted felon with ties to notorious Gambino crime family boss John Gotti, a recently released video has\nrevealed.\n\nCinque can be seen in a video obtained by the Palm Beach Daily News , cheering loudly as a tuxedo-clad\nTrump runs through a number of campaign promises before the hundreds of guests attending the New Year's\nEve bash the President-elect threw at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Saturday.\n\n\"The taxes are coming down, regulations are coming off, we're going to get rid of Obamacare,\" Trump can be\nheard saying as an exuberant Cinque stands next to him, pumping his fists into the air.\n\nCinque's Sunday appearance with Trump might raise some eyebrows.\n\nBeyond a 1989 felony conviction for possessing nearly $100,000 worth of stolen artwork, Cinque \"used to be\nfriends with John Gotti,\" according to a New York Magazine profile from 1995 .\n\nCinque was also \"shot three times and left for dead\" in a 1980 incident that authorities described as \"a hit,\"\naccording to the profile.\n\nFurther, Saturday's Mar-a-Lago party was far from the first time Cinque cheered on for Trump.\n\nAn Associated Press report from this spring showed that the American Academy of Hospitality Sciences, a\ncompany owned and operated by Cinque, has awarded more than a dozen of Trump's golf courses, hotels,\ncasinos and private clubs with so-called \"Star Diamond\" awards \"of true excellence in hospitality.”\n\nThe same report also found that about half of the roughly 30 people listed as \"trustees\" to the company are\nTrump friends or business associates.\n\nTrump, meanwhile, was listed on the company's website as its \"ambassador extraordinaire,” and he even\nappeared in a 2009 tribute video to Cinque in which he said, \"There's nobody like him. He's a special guy.\"\n\nBut when asked by reporters about Cinque in May, Trump denied knowing anything about him or his criminal\npast.\n\n\"Ifa guy's going to give you an award, you take it,” the President-elect said at the time. \"You don't tend to look\nup his whole life story.”\n\nThe Trump transition team did not immediately return a request for comment on how the President-elect knows\nCinque or why they appeared together Saturday.\n\nWhile standing alongside Cinque, Trump also took a moment to address the terror attack that left scores of\nnightclub revelers in Istanbul dead over the weekend — and how the bloodbath somehow necessitates a\nMexican border wall.\n\n“We will build a wall, you know that. We will build a wall,” the President-elect told the raucous crowd."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt_23154
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt
subject:
  Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early

messages:
  [{"sender": "Anil Ambani <Anil.Ambani>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nInfo.\n\nBR,\nAnil"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anil.ambani aa"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:11:37 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "India Israel Key -not for email"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt_23166
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population, regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed. and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up in lock ups."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 3:13:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "A new guy for your stable of smart guys. He taught at SAIS in DC where I went in 1989. I was just down there a few weeks ago and was on a panel with him. He is vicious on Bill C's NATO expansion -- biggest foreign policy error since WWII. Retiring. Let me know if you want an intro -- I am sure that your Russian friends would enjoy talking to him. Book well worth reading... https://www.amazon.com/Mission-Failure-America-World-Post-Cold/dp/0812994654/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1476889698&sr=1-1&keywords=mission+failure"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt_23171
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in dc today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trust me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:54:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course I trust you...what is going on?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029888.txt_23172
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029888.txt
subject: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell, CP, FRS", "recipients": ["Brad", "Jess"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\n\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a\nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records\nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have\n\nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026490.txt_23178
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026490.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rivkin, David <Q", "recipients": ["Grossman, Andrew M <a"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt_23180
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes,,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:41:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "call me"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt_23189
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:58:30 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "What is this??? When this will stop. This is crazy.\nAnd you are NOT 57 ;)\n\nAnd certainly you are NOT socially awkward.\nWho is that idiot.\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:28 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward>\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who\nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair story\nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt_23190
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt
subject: my occasional tweet
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Kevin Bright", "Danny Goldberg"], "timestamp": "5/9/2019 11:24:30 PM", "subject": "my occasional tweet", "body": "\"Trump has grabbed the pussy of the statue of Liberty.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt_23191
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Just checking in to see how you are getting along these days. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going well\nTake care."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "judge jeannie?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i can to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the system breaks down.\nI assume you were just flipping the channels.\nHope you are doing well. I see they never miss an opportunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking how you missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention much of all you have been put through already. I hope the cases are all behind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you and your team decided on a different direction. Whatever works best."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is it overblown. ? all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. I recall many that told stories of how they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things:\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an open invitation for cross examination and any other exploitation possible as it cannot be an accepted part of the process.\n2. In this whole matter, I am most disturbed by the composition of the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to learn anything from the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted above-board without personal and political baggage. Mueller had a whole universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to make up his team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. I can go one by one; but I will spare you. Here are a couple of examples:\nA. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as \"The Pathological Liar\" after the SNL character. He literally would withhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel went to the bathroom or lunch, stick the documents under others on his table and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. I have been brought into a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have come to me to admit their role in it - to get murder convictions in two cases. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined both Arthur Anderson and Enron through his work, all of which was rejected by the higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton sycophant. Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose Weissmann for his chief counsel at the FBI years ago.\nB. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm, was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email investigation. Now how does that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy and I don't want that kind of character around. I also have an ineffective assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million earnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.\nC. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the EDNY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases, regularly threatened others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he knew it was a completely bogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved. He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama gave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY and on and on.\nI don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I certainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we have meddled in other countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bottom line is, if there is to be an investigation, just play it straight up. I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked him to head up the team, I would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radio (I never would have been asked), as I know he would pick a team of honest folks from across the spectrum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced\" andys office\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions. . - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mueller ? how are you ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a piece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his friends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "nicely put. !. sounds like you suffer a similar bias. :)"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:40:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "One guy in the Times article on him got it about right i think. Apart from the publicity hound bit, i think of him as a guy who cut and run in your case and looked out for himself. He never hesitates to respond to me by email; but when i read about something that came up in his deposition that i thought might help you and emailed him for a copy - radio silence.\nI guess these days he likes to make himself relevant. Oh well, we all have our strengths and weaknesses i am sure and i have many more of the latter."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt_23192
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 1:04:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\nmother 102 in May.)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt_23198
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2019 6:07:04 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey \nPres Trump arrives PBI Friday the 15th at 6pm, \nHe departs Monday 18th 4:30pm \nMay effect our PBI arrival from Puerta Plata if we travel on Monday just heads up,. \nThx, \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt_23206
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt
subject: Re: High Profile
messages:
  [{"sender": "MAILER-DAEMON @p3plsmtp05-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [MAILER-DAEMON @p3plsmtp05-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:20 AM", "subject": "failure notice", "body": "Your mail message to the following address(es) could not be delivered.\nThis is a permanent error. Please verify the address(es) and try again.\n\n<christina@jeffreyepstein.org>:\nchild status 100...The e-mail message could not be delivered because the user's mailfolder is full.\n\n--- Below this line is a copy of the message."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith <christina@jeffreyepstein.org>"], "timestamp": "Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:15:19 -0400", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt_23209
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|cr Sa"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 4:01:37 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "ihtink weak thoughts?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal —"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re: -", "body": "Here it is.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that\nattended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and\n\nElizabeth Price Foley\n\nJune 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt_23213
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Here goes:\n\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and\nnow-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts,\nnor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented\nfederal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order --\ninvolving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal\ngovernment. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest\nprosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not\n\nbelong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time,\nincluding now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns\nthe federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by\njournalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the\nJustice Department in Washington, D.C. .\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history\nwhatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was\nreasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the\nlike were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly\nconnected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal\ngovernment that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tara\nTrump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 6:40:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Also think there should be a line in there somewhere which clearly confirms that JE understands and recognizes\nthat he did something wrong"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt_23214
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 12:03:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Apologies for requesting support in what was originally intended as an update on work done \ni am done with that, you will receive no more messages from me regarding funding, i am most grateful for your \nhelp—without it, i doubt i would have a book in view on Honour killings—i can finish it on my own and fully \nintend to \nyou once said you would \"never not support me\" but never, as we both know, is a very long time—i am much \nmore scared of Trump's capacity to destroy the stock market—but as long as i do not get orders from you to \nsell, i will ride it out \ni hope everything is good in your life \nwarmest best, as always \nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt_23219
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt
subject: RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another \nman, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we \nwant to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this \nbehalf?\n\nMy number is\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\n, and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:47:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032061.txt_23233
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032061.txt
subject: Re: nuts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 3:26:04 AM", "subject": "Re: nuts", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael", "Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 8, 2016 9:24 PM", "subject": "nuts", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014397.txt_23235
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014397.txt
subject: USDJPY testing 110. Buy Japan upside
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "11/17/2016 8:55:12 PM", "subject": "USDJPY testing 110. Buy Japan upside", "body": "We can also discuss single stock and Topix banks index (TPNBNK) ideas\n\nThe Republican sweep means higher USD and yields are a foregone conclusion. We see USDJPY reaching 120 next year and Japanese reflation, bullish for Japanese equities, particularly the banks.\n\nHuge focus on Banks/Financials post Trump election, they're the big winners.\n\nThe Banking sector is the main beneficiary of higher rates/less regulation overhang.\n\nInvestors are still underweight Japan. Especially in financials, so the move can have legs\n\nValuation still at depressed levels. Japanese Banks are cheap versus their peers.\n\nHaving said that, uncertainty still there so buying calls and call spreads makes sense. Some investors are still skeptical. Instead of building a large cash position, we believe options are a better play in case the market reverses and initiates a risk off move again.\n\n-BAML expects USDJPY 115-120 by end of 2017. NKY target of 20,000 (12% upside)\n\n-BOJ’s intentions to refrain from further flattening of local yield curve positive for Banks and Insurers.\n\n-DXJ carries a 12% weight in banks whereas NKY is only 1.07% and even TPX is only 8.55%.\n\n-Positioning light. DXJ shares outstanding at 3year lows as foreigners have net sold $52bIn of JP equities ytd.\n\n-DXJ skew remains flat. 2m 25d Put /Call skew at 19%tile over the past year.\n\nJapan Investment Strategy, Japan Econ Outlook and Japan Macro Watch attached\n\nDXJ 2m 25d Put/Call over the past year."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt_23239
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt
subject: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:57:47 AM", "subject": "Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered \nlawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a \ncase with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he \napparemtly is a successful lawyer. \nOne thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced. \nHope you are doing well. \nDavid \nReport: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal \nhttps://aol.it/2BDSk01"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt_23244
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 6:10:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Finally got the apartment so can \"move in\" tomorrow."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018, at 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Now being reported that Trump's lawyers sent a letter to MW's publisher demanding that they not publish the book."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt_23248
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 4:14:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "zero. do you want to have dinner with rothchild in new york. thurs. , woody?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\n\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012684.txt_23255
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012684.txt
subject: Trump & Patricia Kluge
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/17/2011 6:19:01 PM", "subject": "Trump & Patricia Kluge", "body": "Trump in talks to buy socialite Kluge's Charlottesville vineyard \nand estate \nBy Annie Gowen and Steve Yanda \nWashington Post Staff Writers \nWednesday, February 16, 2011; 10:47 PM \nEmbattled Virginia socialite and winemaker Patricia Kluge may have found a white knight to preserve her Charlottesville \nempire - real estate mogul Donald Trump. \nTrump's business adviser said Wednesday that Trump was negotiating to buy not only Kluge's grand estate, Albemarle \nHouse, which a bank foreclosed on in January, but all of Kluge's former real estate holdings outside Charlottesville near \nThomas Jefferson's Monticello estate. \nThose include 200 acres of land adjacent to the estate that once had a nine-hole golf course designed by Arnold Palmer, \na 900-acre vineyard and a failed real estate development where Kluge had planned to market luxury \"farmettes\" with their \nown grapevines. \nLeslie Goldman, a Washington-based adviser to Trump, said it would be \"premature to speculate\" what Trump had \nplanned for the area, but said the land has \"significant historical value and potential for development.\" \n\"Obviously, the more acreage, the more pieces you acquire, the more possibilities there are,\" he said. \nTrump has already made forays into Virginia real estate. In 2009, he purchased a 600-acre golf club along the Potomac \nRiver in Loudoun County and renamed it the Trump National Golf Club. He raised the ire of local environmentalists last \nsummer after the club removed hundreds of trees that it claimed threatened the shoreline. \nTrump's representative appeared at a foreclosure auction of Kluge's large estate on the courthouse steps in downtown \nCharlottesville Wednesday morning, where a crowd of about 50 lawyers and curiosity seekers had gathered. \nIn the past year, Kluge's travails have become well-known around Charlottesville, where over the last two decades the \nBritish-born socialite has cut a glamorous - and sometimes controversial - figure. \nIn 1999 she founded what became a well-respected vineyard on land around her grand house, which she had received as \npart of a high-profile divorce settlement in 1990 from John Kluge, the late media mogul who was once the country's richest \nman. \nKluge Estate Winery and Vineyard won accolades for sparkling wines - served at the White House and at Chelsea \nClinton's wedding last summer - and a blended red called New World Red. Kluge and her third husband, retired IBM \nexecutive William Moses, worked to promote not only their own wine brand but the growing Virginia wine industry as a \nwhole. \nBut in the past two years, following some aggressive expansion of the winery and the failure of the housing development, \nKluge fell upon hard times. Credit problems forced her to sell off her jewelry and extensive collection of art and antiques \nlast year. She lost the vineyard at a foreclosure auction in December. \nKluge had initially tried to sell Albemarle House - which the Sotheby's listing calls \"one of the most important residences in \nthe United States since the Golden Age\" - for $100 million, but when no buyer came forward the price was ultimately \nslashed to $24 million. The eight-bedroom home has its own movie theater, wine grotto, swimming pool and helipad. \nAt Wednesday's auction, Bank of America, Kluge's creditor, took full ownership of the property with a bid of $15.26 million. \nBut Trump holds what the lawyers called a \"right of first refusal\" to buy the property at a later date. \nKluge and Moses declined to comment directly on yesterday's events, but both have said they have been working \ndiligently with their lawyers over the last several months to help save their business. \nThe Trump organization had been working closely with Kluge and Moses on the deal, but how the partnership will play out \n- if they would have a future role at what would be Trump's vineyard - remained unclear Wednesday. \n\"They've been working together with the objective of trying to preserve the vineyard for the benefit of the Virginia wine \nindustry,\" Goldman said. \"If it all comes together, it may provide them an opportunity to continue to stay involved in their \nlife's work.\" \nYanda reported from Charlottesville. Staff researcher Magda Jean-Louis also contributed to this report."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt_23256
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:40 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazovithe-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already read it. congratulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with Shirley MacLaine last year and went to her ranch in Santa Fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? i'm between albert and santa fe, zorro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I will let you know when I go back. Do you know her?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Still just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:05:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Safe good boy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt_23262
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come, stay 8-10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage? .?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn’t work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\n\nHow do I do that???\n\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- Ari Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\n\nOfficially in Venice , Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:58:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "011-331-441-70210. In 2 hrs"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030343.txt_23266
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030343.txt
subject: Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg, \nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London. \nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client. \nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to \nwhich he has not responded. \nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his \nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email. \nYours faithfully, \nDavid Pegg \nThe Guardian \nKings Place \n90 York Way \nLondon \nNi 9GU"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 8:20:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029174.txt_23269
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029174.txt
subject: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/19/2018 3:53:57 AM", "subject": "Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Jeffrey: \nHow's all in our crazy world? \nI'm in NY until August 31 (then again, after Beijing, Sept. 25 — Oct. 14). If you are in town, meet? \nWhen convenient, I'd like you to meet Peter Getzels, Closer To Truth producer/director (I've worked with Peter \nfor 12 years); he would very much like to meet you in person, describe the Radical Breakthroughs process in \ndetail, get your feedback. He would come up from DC. We can always do Skype, of course, but Peter would \nappreciate to meet in person early in the process. Breakthroughs is a Big Project, big opportunity for impact. \nAll are truly excited. \nBelow are highlights of Breakthroughs progress. \nAttached is latest CNN on trade war and below are links (caution: a few weeks old is ancient history in Trump \ntime). \nThe US trade war against China: The view from Beijing \nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d514f3551544f78457a6333566d54/share p.html \nHow should China handle the trade war? \nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d3449544d79457a6333566d54/share_p.html \nLove to discuss stuff \nRobert \nRadical Breakthrough Development Work \n• Research on each of the 13 episodes is ongoing and we are moving towards creating a short list of the top \ncontributors per episode (with some contributors in multiple episodes). \n• We are aggregating the top contributors around 4 to 5 central locations, such as SF Bay Area, LA, Chicago, \nBoston, New York, Santa Fe, London, Oxford, and Cambridge for the main shoots. \n• We are creating a short list of locations for the secondary shoot - i.e. the more observational shoots on specific \nlabs and research facilities, such as the Music Lab at McGill, the Sleep Lab at Harvard. \n• We are planning a recce in the autumn to assess locations and meet some of the key contributors. \n• We've brought on a production manager / line producer as we develop detailed research, contributors, \nlocations, budgets. \n• Our team is working toward interviewing and hiring a top science-literate associate producer / dedicated \nresearch producer. We've been coordinating with colleagues at HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Association) \nas well as National Geographic for staffing referrals, and now have a strong short list. This is a critical, long-\nterm position. \n• We are assessing graphics and animation companies and researching styles and graphic ideas that we might \nuse to communicate some of the more complex ideas. \n• Our digital team is researching a web extension for the www.closertotruth.com website, developing ideas for a \ndedicated site neighborhood for \"Radical Breakthroughs.\" We are in discussions with several website \ndesign companies, including the company that designed and built our original CTT site, for ideas and bids on \ncreating the expanded site. \n• By mid-October, we expect to begin to schedule the shoots."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030431.txt_23284
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030431.txt
subject: My datebook
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:37:40 AM", "subject": "My datebook", "body": "Three hours with SB who believes DJT won't last to the mid terms. Also saw Brad Karp who is super menchy and offering much help on next book."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029606.txt_23291
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029606.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 117 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow0\nMichael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following\nhttps://www.npr.org/676040070"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "sexy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 7:50:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "()always!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt_23309
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to\n\nTrump circle. http://(www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd... have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <i>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <i>"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we\nwants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <i>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, Ive set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:23:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt_23310
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt_23349
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Iaminparis you?"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland [qq]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. Iam\ntotally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:40:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok but it's easy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019310.txt_23358
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019310.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Il giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": null, "body": "What does this say???"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt_23360
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["soon yi previ"], "timestamp": "3/24/2014 7:06:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "When I was 8 years old, I watched my trial-lawyer father play Horace Vandergelder in the Livingston, N.J., \ncommunity-theater production of \"Hello, Dolly!\" He entered wearing an enormous marching-band bass drum \n(the character is in a parade), and he roared to his sobbing niece, \"Dammit! How am I supposed to play \n'Yonkers My Yonkers' with all that bellowing in my ears!\" It was the most exciting thing I had ever seen. \nI was a melancholic child. Worried, anxious. I never felt as if I belonged anywhere, as if I were a foreign \nexchange student living among the other kids, who seemed predestined to love sports. Add to that alienation the \nfact that my parents were going through a divorce, and I was truly treading water. But in that junior high school \nauditorium, I felt like I'd discovered a secret I didn't even know was being whispered. There was a place where \nI might belong: It was the Theater, and I was sold. \nA few years later, at Stagedoor Manor in Loch Sheldrake, N.Y., I joined an intensive theater boot camp for kids \njust like me. The second I stepped off the bus, I felt like baby Simba when he's lifted into the air in \"The Lion \nKing\" and all the animals sing. Everyone was affectionate; everyone hugged; no was called \"gay\" for doing \nanything that wasn't masculine. (My insecurity about this had shamefully kept me from doing theater in \nschool.) It was utopia, and I never wanted to leave. \nPhoto \nFrom left, Helene Yorke, Zach Braff and Lenny Wolpe in the musical \"Bullets Over Broadway.\" Credit Sara \nKrulwich/The New York Times \nIt was there I met Michael Larsen, the musical director of the camp. He told me that I wasn't just a camper \nhaving fun, but that I also had talent. And he was tough — sometimes he'd scream at me — but I knew it was \nbecause he thought I had a shot. (Michael was the first of many gay men instrumental in guiding me to where I \nam now, which is why I try to speak on behalf of gay rights whenever I can. But I suppose that's a different \nessay.) \nAt 18, I was cast as Woody Allen and Diane Keaton's son in the film \"Manhattan Murder Mystery,\" my first \nmovie role. And now, after studying film and theater at Northwestern University, playing J. D. on \"Scrubs\" on \nTV for nine years and directing two films, I'm working with Woody Allen again. I'm typing these words in my \ndressing room at the St. James Theater, where on April 10 I'll open in \"Bullets Over Broadway,\" a musical \nadaptation of his hit film. I play David Shayne, a struggling writer in 1929 New York who agrees to cast a \nmobster's ditsy girlfriend in one of his plays in order to get it produced. \nThe St. James is where Yul Brynner opened in \"The King and I\" in 1951; where hits like \"Oklahoma!,\" \"The \nPajama Game,\" \"Gypsy,\" \"The Who's Tommy,\" and \"The Producers\" played, and where, in 1964, by the most \nsurreal of coincidences, Carol Channing first descended an endless staircase in \"Hello, Dolly!\" I sit in Dressing \nRoom 201, where many of the great luminaries of the Broadway stage — Patti LuPone, Nathan Lane, Mandy \nPatinkin — have paced waiting for the intercom to chime, \"Places for Act I, please.\" This is the sanctuary that a \nlittle invisible boy in New Jersey dreamed he'd one day find. \nPhoto \nZach Braff in a 1988 production of \"Godspell\" at Stagedoor Manor. Credit Stagedoor Manor \nIt's my first time on Broadway, but not my first time onstage. My first job straight out of college was in George \nC. Wolfe's production of \"Macbeth\" at the Public Theater, starring Alec Baldwin, Liev Schreiber, Angela \nBassett and Michael C. Hall, and I've since appeared Off Broadway in shows at the Delacorte and Second Stage \nTheater. \nContinue reading the main story \nSuzy Menkes on the fashion designer L'Wren Scott \n• A Times selection of noteworthy cultural events in New York City and beyond  \n• Net-a-Porter means \"ready to party\" \nContinue reading the main story \nAdvertisement \nThe first day of rehearsal for \"Macbeth,\" Alec Baldwin sat down next to me. \"Who do you play?\" he asked. My \nvoice quivered: \"Ummm, I play Fleance and Young Seward.\" He paused. \"Oh — so I kill you twice.\" Each \nnight, as he drove his broadsword through my heart, I thought, \"I've made it!\" \nIn the sixth season of \"Scrubs,\" the show's creator, Bill Lawrence (also a major fan of musical comedy), \ndecided to do a musical episode. It was the first time I had done musical comedy since I was at camp, and it \ninstantly reminded me how much I loved it. My favorite song from the episode was called \"Guy Love.\" In it, \nDonald Faison (my best friend in real life and on the show) and I sang about how our homoerotic love for each \nother was nothing to apologize for. (\"It's guy love, that's all it is.\") The experience replanted the seed, and I \nmade a promise to myself: One day I would sing on Broadway. \nPhoto \nZach Braff, left, and Donald Faison on \"Scrubs,\" which had a musical episode in its sixth season. Credit ABC \nI'd be curled in the fetal position spooning a pillow right now, though, if it weren't for my current director, \nSusan Stroman. Directing and choreographing a musical is the most epic undertaking for one human being, yet \nSusan (or Stro, as the cool Broadway kids call her) handles it with aplomb. \nAnd she's not just choreographing the actors and dancers, but also the magnificent set designed by Santo \nLoquasto, which moves in ways I didn't know scenery could move. It's a dance of men and women and \nmachines and winches and elevators and lights. The wings of the St. James are very narrow, so when a giant \npiece of scenery disappears from the audience's view, the most elaborate game of Tetris begins, as the \noutstanding stage crew turns and lifts and twists; not an inch is wasted. The second the orchestra strikes the first \nnote of the overture, no one stops moving until the final curtain hits the deck. \nDuring \"Manhattan Murder Mystery,\" I had every word of my lines memorized down to the punctuation mark. \nI'll never forget: The first thing Woody said to me was, \"We're probably not going to say exactly what's on the \npage so ... you know ... just try to keep up. ...\" While we've been in previews on \"Bullets,\" he and Stro have \nbeen giving us notes each day on the previous night's performance. One night, I dropped a great joke by \naccident. He said to me with a smile, \"You'll probably get a bigger laugh if you actually say it onstage.\" \nAll the people on Broadway are the best at what they do. All dancers want to work with Stro, so she gets the \nbest dancers in New York City. Is there an oboist in the orchestra? You can guarantee he's the best oboist on the \nisland of Manhattan. Need to recreate the look of 1929? The six-time Tony winner William Ivey Long is here to \ndesign the costumes. And the voices! I am in awe. There has yet to be a time when I don't get goose bumps \nwhen Betsy Wolfe, who plays my girlfriend, belts out the final notes of our duet, \"I Found a New Baby.\" \nIn TV and film, where I've had the bulk of my experience, the best moments of the day are edited together to \ncreate the best version of what you've captured. It's a different art, with a different process. But when the \ncurtain rises at 8:05 every night at the St. James, the audience is being treated to a ballet of moving parts as \nintricate as a pocket watch. Whether it's the 19-piece orchestra under the stage, the crew in the wings or the 30 \nperformers on top of it, the gears turn, the set spins and a tiny hidden smile creeps across my face.\nZach Braff is an actor, writer and director. His new film, \"Wish I Was Here,\" opens July 18."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026033.txt_23376
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026033.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd... have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if\n\nwe wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, Ive set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to go to him. if he is shy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is not so much shy, as paranoid. I have to contact him through his wife on a burner phone, which they don't reliably check. But have queried."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They came back to New York yesterday. He would like to meet, tho wary of being seen, etc. I will work it out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "woudl you like to ask him to dinner tomrrow night you me and woody my house"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 1:29:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My guess is that he will be too paranoid. He believes NYP photographers are following him. But will ask."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026508.txt_23378
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026508.txt
subject: Re: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting.\nI admire your friends determination.\nAre you serious about working on this?\nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization.\nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George bush. This might be bad.\nOn other hand, gore would not have to move left to take Nader vote.\nIf I like centrism is it clear that this is better.\nI get that it avoids arbitrary outcomes but assume that a tea party nut is as likely to elect a dem as a lefty is to elect et a republican.\nAnyway thanks for setting up.\nBtw I gave them 10,000.\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:05 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Hi Larry,\nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman's commitment to the project is impressive.\nI AM serious about working on this---it's a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics\nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter's favorite candidate-----in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.\nBest wishes,\nEric"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument\nWhat about aspects not quite in model.\nMore folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit.\nSeparately I pitched this to someone today.\nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. Is there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists.\nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it's important that voters be given the choice to rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one]\nIn fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given lier a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere).\nEric"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Are there empirical studies on turnout."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: This morning", "body": "I believe there are, but don't know how careful they are. I will try to get you references."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:01 AM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "More than u may want to know"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "9/12/2018 6:15:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "https://www.cato-unbound.org/2016/12/13/jason-mcdaniel/ranked-choice-voting-likely-means-lower-turnout-more-errors difficult to judge one way or the other. turnout, does not reflect ethnicity.? stable does not mean same. . looking at the argumnents on both sides , I would have to conclude in your words a big nothingburger"}]


