# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt_2
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that \nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:34:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "maybe as a favor to trump. in exchange for yemen and iran support. . smells doesnt it?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt_12
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "____________________ the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <:MM11>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with Mi=story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <_____________________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "talk then"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt_14
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt
subject: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious manner.\n\nAttached and below the same.\n\nDear Jeffrey:\n\nAs requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV series \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\":\n\n(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional understandings) to justify a major TV series?\n(ii) Even if 'yes' to (i), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?\n\nIn preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the \"Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams\" (2012) and the sole author of the forthcoming \"An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams\" (Cambridge University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.\n\nWhen we asked Patrick, his first response — \"This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story\" — and he cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and established, and (ii) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes (e.g., PTSD and Depression).\n\nTo understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that there are two distinct kinds of sleep — REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves (electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).\n\nFollowing are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.\n\nMemory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories. Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders. This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is 'down-regulated' (and the frontal cortex is associated with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is 'up-regulated\" (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep and dreams can enhance creativity.\n\nAs Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\n\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\n\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\n\nWarm regards, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn <11=1>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for —10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\n\nWhen good to meet?\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 9:46:30 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt_18
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt
subject: Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["BS Stern"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 9 2018 10:47 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all — \n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five specific attributes for a candidate by you as a group. \nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive American President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply overwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation shows no sign of ebbing. \nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will still leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. Watching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all asking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump should not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? \nShould Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't support him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and seemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play such outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. \nIt's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for whatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take those bets. \nThe ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination of both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, democratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this on the national stage now. \nAs a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? \nAs we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary system in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot and presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter turn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a combination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of candidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — and purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. \n• This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would start off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is just too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential election. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, sports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must start out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank Democratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine irrelevance otherwise. \n• A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone with a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral votes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral sweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary challenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be cleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states would be off the table entirely. \n• With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side of entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely Stephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily comedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's across the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to disguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near daily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep the voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing access to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of voters in the months leading up to the general election. \n• This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking time bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, gerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples our candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive action. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and narrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. \n• This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities in Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" supports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president could force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The Senate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto disruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both parties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies passed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda items that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course is better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. \nAnd if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the next president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House would have just elected Trump. \nWould Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as president? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress - the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. Would the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the winner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? Precedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their consciences. \nIf we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy campaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign expertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of 2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-gamed. \nPart and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The raft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the electorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in political views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must incorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe Silicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. \nI am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates into a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, murky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to nominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020? \nI look forward to talking more about all of our ideas on this hopeful project in coming weeks. Please feel free to call me to discuss. Thank you for taking time to review this note. \n\nSincerely,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt_19
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt
subject: Re: Marilyn
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate Brianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should have Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 7:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "what apt is Mt. staying in. call david mitchell, put her at the life hotel instead, for tonight if they have room."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 12:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "I had in apartment 3M. I will ask David about a room for tonight instead"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt_21
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2015 6:48:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "below from \nHi Lesley, \nI'm helping a friend at the doctors and should be available between 5 and 630p if we can talk then. Or anytime \ntomorrow before 5pm. Going to Trump speech tomorrow night - think he's going to get the nomination.... \nBest,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt_28
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt
subject: Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahr", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2016 8:29:50 AM", "subject": "Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses", "body": "https://www.cozen.com/cozendocs/7-Trump-Administration-Policies-Affecting-Businesses/#_home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt_45
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/25/2017 1:02:58 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Reid mentioned along with Ted Olson, one or two others as potential add'I lawyers for Trump in today's Law 360"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt_46
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxlgellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1.______________________says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. men.\n\nwas paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other\n\n5, was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where had sex with him. subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms Maxwell directed to sit on Andrew's knee with_______________ Andrew groped both girls. Ms Maxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell r.ited President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt_50
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt
subject: Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2011 7:42:56 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 23, 2011 3:37:46 PM EDT", "subject": "1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Dear Friend, \n\nBoth Sides Now w/Huffington & Matalin celebrates its 1st anniversary this week. As the \nonly 2 sides/2 women show on national radio, we've grown from 16 stations in May of \n2010 to 110 now. \n\nArianna and Mary find consensus that, contrary to the Washington and media \nconventional wisdom, the Jobs Agenda is more urgent than the Deficit Agenda (\"if people \nonly read about shark attacks, they'll worry about shark attacks,\" says Arianna). And they \nagree that there's an apparent outbreak of men abusing the help -- Strauss-Kahn, \nSchwarzenegger, Ensign. To paraphase Freud, what do men want? \n\nBut there's sharp disagreement about whether Rep. Ryan walked into Obama's trap by \nproposing to end Medicare in 10 years. Will the special election this Tuesday in Jack \nKemp's old seat produce a Democratic \"Scott Brown Moment\"? \n\nTo read the show summary and listen, http://www.huffindtonpost.com/huff-radio/both-\nsides-now-1st-annive b 865325.html  \n\nBest, \nMark Green \nHost"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt_53
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt
subject: Re: Shears Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2014 5:56:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "yes agree\nresult got worse with recent negative press, clinton, as we discussed\nwe were down to 1 negative (forbes) before that - Christina can confirm this.\nIt will get back to 1 and then 0 so long as negative things stop coming out. if new negative keeps coming out it\nreally dismantles much of our effort... especially when it involves an ex-president\nno excuses here i'm not pleased with where it is at and am still working to make it happen"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Results still very bad"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 16, 2014", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nThe social media sites are constantly updated: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, google +.\nI'll be in touch later today re: feature article.\nCould you put a site map into the Net site.? This helps rankings. Also could you add it to google analytics\nusing Jeffrey's gmail account? This allows me to monitor it's progress and index it periodically.\nI'll call you later. Thanks,\nChristina"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2014, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Christina,\nhttp://jeffreyepstein.net/ - Site is live and Share This shows up when you scroll down page (look for top menu\nbar)\nI expect this to rank swiftly - I'm sending a list of all properties we need to point over in this direction with\nsuggested anchor text.\nDo you have the topic right I'm doing a placement around? I'm going to have a few articles spun-off from it\nand put into lower tier publications as well.\nI want to push HARD in August with a premium placement, fresh link pushes, and some supporting\nplacements. We should be able to get down to 1 negative by mid-September with a goal of being clean by end\nof year (unless new negative press comes again...)\nFor social media updates... Are you currently doing these? I'd like to look at how often we are doing them and\ntrying to link to our own content more often.\nI'm also exploring if we can get this new site included in Google News and maybe syndicate other important\nAl news through it... would give us free google news spots when we need them..\nJE - There's 3 negatives today and that's 3 too many. There will be progress please continue to be patient as\nyou have been.\nBest\nTyler"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012689.txt_56
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012689.txt
subject: Oscar diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Stephanie"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 6:12 PM", "subject": "Oscar diary", "body": "grueling work have finally paid off. King George VI and Harvey Weinstein now share the journey of a single man who triumphs over adversity.\n\nThe Governor’s ball, held above the Kodak Theater, recreates the Mocambo-Ciro’s niteries of the 1930’s and 40’s, using a palette of teal and white. Three bands alternate musical styles as hungry guests wolf down wolfgang Puck’s delicious food. The winners triumphantly sachet around the room holding their heavy eight pound gold statues.\n\nAn hour later there is a migration to the famous Vanity Fair party hosted by Graydon Carter at the Sunset Tower Hotel owned by Jeff Klein. One celebrity after another poses in front of the green hedge standing in the middle of the circular Vanity Fair logo to record their devotion and support to Graydon and the magazine.\n\nThere’s a hierarchy of arrival times. The inner circle of Graydon’s 150 best friends attend a seated dinner and viewing of the show at 5pm. They include Barry Diller and Diane Von Furstenberg, Francis Ford Coppola, Jon Hamm and Jennifer westfeldt, Betsey Bloomingdale, Tory Burch and Lyor Cohen, Tom Ford, Sandy Gallin, Mitch Glazer and Kelly Lynch, Carolina and Reinaldo Herrera, L’Wren Scott and Sir Mick Jagger, Naomi Watts and Live Schreiber, Wendi Stark, Judd Apatow, Jackie and Joan Collins, George Hammilton, Donna Karan and Steve Martin.\n\nThe best and the brightest talent in town arrive at 9pm. They are Justin Bieber and his date Selena Gomez, Andrew Garfield, Jude Law, Vera Farmiga, Armie Hammer, Jennifer Lawrence, Kevin Spacey, Charlize Theron, Anne Hathaway, Hailee Steinfield,Taylor Hackford and Helen Mirren, Scarlett Johansson, Michelle williams, Isla Fischer and Sasha Baron Cohen, Jane Fonda after her play, “33 Variations”, Melania and Donald Trump whom I introduce to David 0. Russell as The Trumpster gushes about “The Fighter”. Donald offers me a ride home on his plane. He is leaving in ten minutes. Too bad James Franco didn’t know because he is presently sitting on a commercial flight back to school, skipping his own after party. Social standings of the rest of the guests are determined by half hour increments. Every other person previously mentioned in the story is here. VF’s Beth Kseniak and Matt Ullian tell me the list is cut down to 800 this year.\n\nAt 11:30pm there is another celebrity migration up the hill to Madonna manager Guy Oseary’s house. One should note that earlier in the evening Madonna came down the hill to pose in a risqué outfit with daughter Lourdes in front of the green hedge. Madonna and co-host Demi Moore are able to lure the créme de la créme with the promise of fabulous music, dancing and no cameras. Those reported on their dance floor include Ryan Phillippe with Amanda Syedfried, who were making out all night and Phillippe’s ex-wife Reese Witherspoon and new fiancé Jim Toth. They pregnant Natalie Portman and choreographer Benjamin Millepied, Mick Jagger, Tom Hanks, Sean Penn, Ralph Feinnes, Mila Kunis, Cameron Diaz, Gwyneth Paltrow and Renee Zellweger and Bradley Cooper boogie til dawn.\n\nA winner’s work is never done. Colin Firth, Tom Hooper and David Seidler show up at 4:30am at The Four Seasons Hotel for a live broadcast on The Today Show with Meredith Vieira. Functioning on an adrenalin rush, they are back at the Kodak Theater with Geoffrey Rush to appear on Oprah’s live broadcast. Leave it to Oprah to get the king’s last words.\n\nSend to jeffrey"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt_57
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt
subject: Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2017 2:07:16 PM", "subject": "Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque", "body": "Jeffrey --I thought you might be interested in this article-- Nick \n\nTrump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash \nPresident-elect Donald Trump rang in the new year together with Joseph \"Joey No Socks\" Cinque — a \nconvicted felon with ties to notorious Gambino crime family boss John Gotti, a recently released video has \nrevealed. \nCinque can be seen in a video obtained by the Palm Beach Daily News  , cheering loudly as a tuxedo-clad \nTrump runs through a number of campaign promises before the hundreds of guests attending the New Year's \nEve bash the President-elect threw at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Saturday. \n\"The taxes are coming down, regulations are coming off, we're going to get rid of Obamacare,\" Trump can be \nheard saying as an exuberant Cinque stands next to him, pumping his fists into the air. \nCinque's Sunday appearance with Trump might raise some eyebrows. \nBeyond a 1989 felony conviction for possessing nearly $100,000 worth of stolen artwork, Cinque \"used to be \nfriends with John Gotti,\" according to a New York Magazine profile from 1995  . \nCinque was also \"shot three times and left for dead\" in a 1980 incident that authorities described as \"a hit,\" \naccording to the profile. \nFurther, Saturday's Mar-a-Lago party was far from the first time Cinque cheered on for Trump. \nAn Associated Press report from this spring showed that the American Academy of Hospitality Sciences, a \ncompany owned and operated by Cinque, has awarded more than a dozen of Trump's golf courses, hotels, \ncasinos and private clubs with so-called \"Star Diamond\" awards \"of true excellence in hospitality.\" \nThe same report also found that about half of the roughly 30 people listed as \"trustees\" to the company are \nTrump friends or business associates. \nTrump, meanwhile, was listed on the company's website as its \"ambassador extraordinaire,\" and he even \nappeared in a 2009 tribute video to Cinque in which he said, \"There's nobody like him. He's a special guy.\" \nBut when asked by reporters about Cinque in May, Trump denied knowing anything about him or his criminal \npast. \n\"If a guy's going to give you an award, you take it,\" the President-elect said at the time. \"You don't tend to look \nup his whole life story.\" \nThe Trump transition team did not immediately return a request for comment on how the President-elect knows \nCinque or why they appeared together Saturday. \nWhile standing alongside Cinque, Trump also took a moment to address the terror attack that left scores of \nnightclub revelers in Istanbul dead over the weekend — and how the bloodbath somehow necessitates a \nMexican border wall. \n\"We will build a wall, you know that. We will build a wall,\" the President-elect told the raucous crowd. \n\"And speaking of walls,\" he continued. \"In Turkey tonight — has anybody heard? Big disaster took place in \nTurkey tonight. Many, many, many people killed...It's a horror show. So we're going to get things running \nproperly.\" \nISIS claimed responsibility for the Saturday attack  , which left at least 39 people dead and dozens more \nwounded, calling the lone gunman who carried out the massacre a \"heroic soldier of the caliphate.\" The suspect  \nhad yet to be named and located by Turkish authorities early Tuesday. \nThe President-elect made building a wall along the country's southern border one of his main campaign talking \npoints, frequently promising his supporters that it will be a \"great\" and \"beautiful\" wall. \nBut his pledge to construct a border barrier has gone under several renditions, with the President-elect admitting \nin November that it might actually end up \"part wall, part fence.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt_66
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt
subject:
  Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anil.ambani"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:11:37 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "India Israel Key -not for email"}, {"sender": "Anil Ambani <Anil.Ambani", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nInfo.\nBR,\nAnil"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt_76
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer\nvery useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and\ncongress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. | stock market even in\ntech, needs biotech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are\n20k members ofa tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is\nfocused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion\nthat has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with\nwhat you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in\nthe secondary market... blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in\nseparate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied\nup in lock ups."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "number"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 3:13:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Anew guy for your stable of smart guys. He taught at SAIS in DC where I went in 1989. I was just\ndown there a few weeks ago and was on a panel with him. He is vicious on Bill C's NATO expansion --\nbiggest foreign policy error since WWII. Retiring. Let me know if you want an intro -- Iam sure that\nyour Russian friends would enjoy talking to him. Book well worth reading...\n\n1&keywords=mission+failure"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt_92
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt
subject: Trump's conflict web
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2016 7:43:45 PM", "subject": "Trump's conflict web", "body": "http://therealdeal.com/issues articles/trumps-conflict-web/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt_98
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/10/17 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Since sending the note below, we have heard from the Australian National University. They informed us:\n\n\"The characterisation by Professor Krauss that The Australian National University (ANU) found the complaint to be ‘unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent’ is false.\"\n\nThey also told us that you resigned your honorary appointment at ANU on November 3. Can you comment on the reason for your resignation from ANU?\n\nI would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you. Again, we are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time. Please provide any comments you wish us to consider before then.\n\nSincerely,\n\nPeter Aldhous"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:34:49 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Hello Peter. Iam currently on a plane. I sent you earlier from the plane an email response to your letter, which IT hope you received. Regarding your note below: My earlier remark to you was based on my correspondence\n\nwith the universities during and after the investigation, and the conclusion I drew from the ANU report, which I quoted for you in my response to your note. The claims made in the allegation which were later demonstrated to be false, or which were then not supported after repeated requests from the University to substantiate the claim,\n\nprovided evidence that the claim was fabricated (as I knew it must be), and therefore maliciously so.\n\nI had been planning on resigning my honorary appointment at ANU before I received the original letter from ANU because my wife had moved to the US several years ago, and I no longer visited the University regularly to work with colleagues there as I did in earlier years. When I received the letter from ANU regarding the complaint, I decided to wait to resign my appointment until the investigation was completed and the complaint was dismissed. After it was, I sent my note of resignation in, and I note that upon its receipt the Dean he suggested I remain on until my appointment expired at the end of this year, but as I had made my decision to resign earlier I felt no need to wait until then. I received a very nice note from the director of the unit I work with (who was made aware of the complaint and its resolution by the Dean) who expressed thanks for my many contributions to the University while there, and my interactions with staff, students, and faculty there.\n\nI hope this clarifies your issues.\n\nLMK"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031288.txt_105
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031288.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke [darren@indykepllc.com]", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Regards,\n\nDarren"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt_111
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI. \nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance \nfrom FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting \ntime of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted \non our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US. \nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data \nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I \nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or \nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is \nexpensive and the start up is running out of money. \nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea. \nRegards, \nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:29:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt_116
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack ANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2017 8:48:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You were spot on, Jeffrey!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 10 juil. 2017 a 23:17", "subject": "re trump", "body": "asi said they will first go after his family"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt_117
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt
subject: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In \na sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I \nhave some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll \nsurely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will \namp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've \nencountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Darren Indyke \nPrivileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt_118
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt
subject: Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "8/14/2012 1:05:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "John Connolly Ed.D.", "recipients": ["RALPH BERNSTEIN", "Morad Tahbaz"], "timestamp": "August 4, 2012 3:54:25", "subject": "FW: Public wor vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ed thompson", "recipients": ["Joseph Bernstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.\n\nA recent \"Investor's Business Daily\" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health organization.\n\nPercentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:\n\nU.S. 65%\n\nEngland 46%\n\nCanada 42%\n\nPercentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:\n\nU.S. 93%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:\n\nU.S. 90%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:\n\nU.S. 77%\n\nEngland 40%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nNumber of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:\n\nU.S. 71\n\nEngland 14\n\nCanada 18\n\nPercentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in \"excellent health\":\n\nU.S. 12%\n\nEngland 2%\n\nCanada 6%\n\nAnd now for the last statistic:\nNational Health Insurance?\nU.S. NO\nEngland YES\nCanada YES\nCheck this last set of statistics!!\tThe percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private \tbusiness sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is \ta real-life business, not a government job Here are the percentages.\nT. Roosevelt..................... \t38%\nTaft.................................. \t40%\nWilson ............................. \t52%\nHarding........................... \t49%\nCoolidge.......................... \t48%\nHoover............................ \t42%\nF. Roosevelt.................... \t50%\nTruman............................ \t50%\nEisenhower...................... \t57%\nKennedy.......................... \t30%\nJohnson........................... \t47%\nNixon............................... 53%\nFord................................ 42%\nCarter............................. 32%\nReagan............................ 56%\nGH Bush......................... 51%\nClinton ........................... 39%\nGW Bush........................ 55%\nObama..................... 8%\nThis helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:\nonly 8% of them have ever worked in private business!\nThat's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?\nHow can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as \"community organizers.\" They should have been in an employment line\nPass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt_123
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt
subject:
  J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"

messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. \n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on the political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally. \n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event. \n\nYou are invited to participate in an exclusive conference call\n\nPost-election insights: The road ahead \n\nThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time\n\nHosted by\n\nJohn Duffy, Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Bank\n\nFeaturing\n\nPeter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility, JPMorgan Chase & Co.\n\nAs the new political landscape begins to take shape, join us to hear Peter discuss:\n\n*         Global implications of election results \n\n*         Impact on regulatory and “fiscal cliff” legislation\n\n*         Bipartisanship in the new environment\n\nTO LISTEN TO THE CALL\n\nToll-free: 877.804.2965\n\nInternational Toll: 706.902.2073\n\nConference ID: 68693542"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt_124
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 12:24:49 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt_140
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt
subject: RE: Boeing
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sean J. Lancaster", "recipients": ["BEE", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "ie"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 7:28:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Boeing", "body": "I was told it was going for part out by Wendy ? I don’t know this buyer you describe"}, {"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\n\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total...\n\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\n\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total...\n\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026328.txt_148
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026328.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 1:23:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think it's a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don't think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case--with it's Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the girls.? react to the fact that the case was settled but the lawyers wanted to trumpet their success."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt_152
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <lisanew@harvard.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 7:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021216.txt_158
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021216.txt
subject: Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners
messages:
  [{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": ["Michael"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Another big prize for Miami Herald."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff [is |", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Pile on"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt_176
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <michaelwolff@...>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:53:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt_182
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt
subject: Fwd: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The book on you...", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <landon.thomas@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. He actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up. Did you ever speak to him?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt_187
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt
subject: Re: Keep the March Alive!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/24/2018 11:35:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "happy to help. but I thought by colorful past might be more of a burden with re conribtuions."}, {"sender": "Diane Ziman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "Jeffrey --\nDid you see my son's email on Sunday?"}, {"sender": "Philip Levine", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Keep the March Alive!", "body": "I spent the day with thousands of fellow Floridians, celebrating the one year anniversary of the Women's March.\nI was inspired by the crowds, their voice, and their passion.\nEmpowering women in the age of Trump is an essential part of moving this country forward. But that means moving forward on issues that have long been stalled - equal pay, better education, and a living wage.\nIn 2018, we have the chance to move these issues forward, and I'm asking for your help in makincit happen.\nIf the crowds we saw in St. Petersburg, Miami, and dozens of other cities across this country are any indication, we have the momentum!\nNow we need to bring it to Tallahassee.\nSincerely,\nPhilip"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt_200
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt
subject: humor and trump and evolutionary logic
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Ej 2cvacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation\narticle on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer\n\nhttps: //ww. thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-]laugh/\n\ncongratulations Robert\n\nJohn and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt_211
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt
subject: TSA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:52:39 PM", "subject": "TSA", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm,,\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm, ?\n\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure, ,\n\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\n\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt_212
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here we go"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/19/2017 10:45:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "soo crazy."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt_214
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 12 2018 05:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "E E E"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Aug 12, 2018, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Great picture of you!!!\nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/08/11/steve-bannon-trying-to-get-on-disgraced-jeffrey-epsteins-good-side/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pagesixdaily&utm_content=20180812&mpweb=755-7237853-719173670\nSteve Bannon trying to get on disgraced Jeffrey Epstein's good side"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt_222
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt
subject: Re: new schedule
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/5/2017 12:32:54 AM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "Monday 4pm confirmed \nPres Trump departs Monday at 11 am,. TFR in place until 11:30am Monday, which requires 24 hour notice for \nDeparture screening if departing during TFR hours., \nTFR (Temporally Flight Restriction), \nOur departure time of 4:30 PM will not be impacted since TFR expires 11:30am Monday,. \nFYI, \nFriday, Josh left voicemail indicating chevron should present purchase agreement by midday Monday. for your \nreview., \nThx \nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 4, 2017, at 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "monday 4 pm to lsj, thurs morning pre clear to palm beach. sunday 12 new york. tues paris to 21 new \nyork. 24 santa fe. -march 1"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt_225
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when 1 see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of\nfood for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok , anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeli <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt_258
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\n\nthere, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday\nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs,\ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back\nhere as \"reported fact.\" Problem with ia story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and\nunlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they\nmight. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are\npublic people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk\ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 4:42:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now good?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt_267
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
subject: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "iin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": "iin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories!\n\nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "what do you suggest?"}, {"sender": "CC", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, February 15, 2016 3:25 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Still have Zorro W pjs... Perfect for my lonely Valentine's Day.\nSo, what do you think about my suggestion to help?\nHow are you holding up?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt_273
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt
subject: Reminder Ed Boyden.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 11:55:40 AM", "subject": "Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden <edboyden@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt_277
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "lor. 8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am in paris you?"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. I am totally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:40:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok but it's easy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt_282
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon i.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt_292
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt
subject: Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg", "Gerald B. Lefcourt", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 2:45:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Zimmerman, Malia McLaughlin", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": "Hi Alan\n\nI was reading through the files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, including the original criminal case where\nyou defended Mr. Epstein, and saw a letter both you and Gerald Lefcourt co-authored on his behalf dated July\n6, 2007.\n\nThe letter said \"Mr. Epstein was part of the original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is\ndescribed as a project 'bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative\nsolutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.’ Focuses of this initiative include poverty, climate\nchange, global health, and religious and ethnic conflicts.\"\n\nI just wanted to clarify if Mr. Epstein was on the board of directors or listed as a founder anywhere or on any\npaperwork associated with the foundation and if so, in what capacity. Also wanted to clarify what you\nspecifically mean by being part of the original group.\n\nI attached a screen shot of the exact passage I am referring to.\nThanks,\n\nMalia"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt_295
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt
subject: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 10:54:13 AM", "subject": "NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth.\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-fortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt_303
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt
subject: CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST
messages:
  [{"sender": "Brad Edward", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 3:49:11 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST", "body": "I expect a crisp, new bill. Your personalized message can say whatever you would like but it should include, “you win!”"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt_310
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2019 6:07:04 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nPres Trump arrives PBI Friday the 15th at 6pm,\nHe departs Monday 18th 4:30pm\n\nMay effect our PBI arrival from Puerta Plata if we travel on Monday,, just heads up,,.\n\nThx,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt_319
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 12:42:34 AM", "subject": "", "body": "as you asked"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt_323
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt
subject: failure notice
messages:
  [{"sender": "MAILER-DAEMON@p3plIsmtp05-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:20 AM", "subject": "failure notice", "body": "Your mail message to the following address(es) could not be delivered.\nThis is a permanent error. Please verify the address(es) and try again.\n<christina@jeffreyepstein.org>:\nchild status 100...The e-mail message could not be delivered because the user's mailfolder is full."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt_328
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers [nn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 12:03:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Apologies for requesting support in what was originally intended as an update on work done\n\niam done with that, you will receive no more messages from me regarding funding, i am most grateful for your\nhelp—without it, i doubt 1 would have a book in view on Honour killings—i can finish it on my own and fully\nintend to\n\nyou once said you would \"never not support me\" but never, as we both know, is a very long time—i am much\nmore scared of Trump's capacity to destroy the stock market—but as long as i do not get orders from you to\nsell, 1 will ride it out\n\ni hope everything is good in your life\n\nwarmest best, as always\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt_330
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt
subject:
  From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted

messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/7/2019 3:36:37 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted", "body": "DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-opens-probe-into-plea-bargain-awarded-by-trump-official-to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein\nIt is bizarre to see who tries to get political mileage out of this."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt_339
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in de today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trust me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:54:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course I trust you...what is going on?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt_340
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2017 12:49:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\n\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship asa source,. thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising. very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\n\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt_343
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": "Re:", "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/, ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is who i am, this how i know jeffrey, employed from „ to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed, firmative. . what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue. . during hte time i met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona. ? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <GMax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I need it written out in full."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:41:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "call me"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt_356
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt
subject: my occasional tweet
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Kevin Bright", "Danny Goldberg"], "timestamp": "5/9/2019 11:24:30 PM", "subject": "my occasional tweet", "body": "“Trump has grabbed the pussy of the Statue of Liberty.”"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt_367
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt
subject: Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting.  We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April*, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go.  We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West **.  We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan.  But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n* The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak.  Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday.  According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined.  This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized.  John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week.  I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”.  We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant.  However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991).  It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President.   His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late.  (Justice Felix Frankfurter).   It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. \n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff.   In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold.  I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow.  Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d].  We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff.   Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities. \n\nMy own business perspective has been limited to that small hotel and restaurant in Stratford, Conn., with an especially difficult lease and a severe recession. But my business associates and I also lived with federal, state and local rules that were all passed with the objective of helping employees, protecting the environment, raising tax dollars for schools, protecting our customers from fire hazards, etc. While I never doubted the worthiness of any of these goals, the concept that most often eludes legislators is: `Can we make consumers pay the higher prices for the increased operating costs that accompany public regulation and government reporting requirements with reams of red tape.' It is a simple concern that is nonetheless often ignored by legislators [e].   For example, the papers today are filled with stories about businesses dropping health coverage for employees. We provided a substantial package for our staff at the Stratford Inn. However, were we operating today, those costs would exceed $150,000 a year for health care on top of salaries and other benefits. There would have been no reasonable way for us to absorb or pass on these costs. \n\nSome of the escalation in the cost of health care is attributed to patients suing doctors. While one cannot assess the merit of all these claims, I've also witnessed firsthand the explosion in blame-shifting and scapegoating for every negative experience in life.   Today, despite bankruptcy, we are still dealing with litigation from individuals who fell in or near our restaurant. Despite these injuries, not every misstep is the fault of someone else. Not every such incident should be viewed as a lawsuit instead of an unfortunate accident. And while the business owner may prevail in the end, the endless exposure to frivolous claims and high legal fees is frightening. \n\nOur Connecticut hotel, along with many others, went bankrupt for a variety of reasons, the general economy in the Northeast being a significant cause. But that reason masks the variety of other challenges we faced that drive operating costs and financing charges beyond what a small business can handle. It is clear that some businesses have products that can be priced at almost any level. The price of raw materials (e.g., steel and glass) and life-saving drugs and medical care are not easily substituted by consumers. It is only competition or antitrust that tempers price increases. Consumers may delay purchases, but they have little choice when faced with higher prices.   In services, however, consumers do have a choice when faced with higher prices. You may have to stay in a hotel while on vacation, but you can stay fewer days. You can eat in restaurants fewer times per month, or forgo a number of services from car washes to shoeshines. Every such decision eventually results in job losses for someone. And often these are the people without the skills to help themselves--the people I've spent a lifetime trying to help. \n\nIn short, “one-size-fits-all” rules for business ignore the reality of the market place. And setting thresholds for regulatory guidelines at artificial levels--e.g., 50 employees or more, $500,000 in sales--takes no account of other realities, such as profit margins, labor intensive vs. capital intensive businesses, and local market economics.   The problem we face as legislators is: Where do we set the bar so that it is not too high to clear? I don't have the answer. I do know that we need to start raising these questions more often.\n\n---------\n\nSo, there you have it, one of the more remarkable epiphanies in American politics: a paean to entrepreneurship and government restraint from one of its most progressive members.  Public epiphanies like this are rare, but there have been others.  Last year, Al Gore conceded that first-generation ethanol was “not good policy” given its low energy conversion ratios, and said he had supported ethanol out of “a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president\" [f].  In 2008, former Fed Chair Greenspan conceded that his Ayn Rand philosophies regarding regulations and shareholder self-interest were flawed.  Perhaps the most famous epiphany was from Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense and one of the principal architects of the Vietnam War.  In 1995, he conceded that he was “wrong, terribly wrong” about the war.  George McGovern was one of the war’s fiercest opponents, saying on the floor of the Senate, “I'm tired of old men dreaming up wars for young men to fight”.\n\nThere may be no magic elixir of policies to speed the adjustment the US faces.  Look at it this way: the US is trying the mega-stimulus route, while the UK has accelerated its fiscal austerity program.  Yet both countries are struggling with below-trend growth and employment.  Perhaps after a debt binge, there are no easy answers, other than time.  What to do next?  McGovern’s article suggests that an overly interventionist public sector may be the wrong answer, given the unintended consequences.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt_379
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Now being reported that Trump’s lawyers sent a letter to MW’s publisher demanding that they not publish the book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018, at 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 6:10:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Finally got the apartment so can “move in” tomorrow."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt_380
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt
subject: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "David", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:57:47 AM", "subject": "Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered\nlawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a\ncase with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he\napparemtly is a successful lawyer.\n\nOne thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced.\nHope you are doing well.\nDavid\n\nReport: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal\nhttps://aol.it/2BDSkO1"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023262.txt_381
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023262.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel ae"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:17 PM", "subject": null, "body": "glad to see you are personally on the mend - as well as the fence. -- As you know i dread money discussions with you-- however -we should address the issue of what you would like to do moving forward. re- do family office, accounting trusts , estate and apollo agreements . Along with your \"payment \"last year we agreed . no further obligations on each side. yes, i continued to moan. I realize that though Ive done quite a lot this year already _, it is not your responsibility. . As you often like to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt_384
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 4:14:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "zero. ! , do you want to have dinner with rothchild in new york. thurs. , woody?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "How plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt_388
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/19/2015 9:43:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:54 PM", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "John Sullivan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI'm John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I've been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan\nJohn Sullivan\nReporter\n1150 15th Street NW\nWashinnton DC 20071"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt_391
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt
subject: time to publish this instead ofthe trite.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mortimer Zuckerman"], "timestamp": "2/10/2015 5:22:52 PM", "subject": "time to publish this instead ofthe trite.", "body": "ore\n15 of 141,013\nFwd: Statement for Press"}, {"sender": "Carolyn Cohen", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "February 10, 2015 at 10:40:57 AM EST", "subject": "Statement for Press", "body": "Alan Dershowitz's Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz.\nDershowitz's lawyers have filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3 false charges. In it they definitively respond to all of the alleged evidence presented by Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers. Since that filing Mr. Dershowitz's lawyers have uncovered additional evidence that Jane Doe #3 has lied about her alleged contacts with fonner President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and the then Mrs. Gore."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023276.txt_395
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023276.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Brad", "Jeffrey", "Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Brad and Jeffrey,\n\nGagosian has one final change to the Picasso agreement. As you know, we have structured this\nagreement with the Buyer as either Narrows Holdings LLC or AP Narrows LP, and given both of those\nentities the right to assign the agreement to any one among Leon, Debra, the kids, or family trusts\nincluding APO1 and APO2.\n\nGagosian wants us to agree that, if Narrows/AP Narrows assigns the agreement to someone else,\nNarrows/AP Narrows “Shall not be discharged from its liabilities under this Agreement and\nshall remain primarily liable to Seller.” Larry is concerned that we might assign to the\nBlack kids or to a trust that has no assets, and then when he has to sue us because we\ndon’t make the final payment of the purchase price but have possession of the art, the\nentity/person to which we have assigned the agreement has no money.\n\n| think this is a valid concern and that we should agree to it.\n\nHowever, Ada just reminded me that it is possible that Narrows/AP Narrows (really,\nLeon’s) agreeing to effectively guarantee payment by the assignee might be considered\na gift to the assignee. In the discussions with Alan about rearranging the bank loan once AP\nNarrows is operational, Alan agreed that there could be deemed to be a potential gift from Leon to\nAPO1/APO2 if Leon provides a guarantee to the bank that is for the benefit of the trusts as partners in AP\nNarrows. Alan suggested mitigating this risk by having the trusts sign side agreements with Leon which\nsay that if AP Narrows defaults on the loan and the bank goes after Leon on his guarantee, the trusts will\nmake him whole.\n\nThis issue only arises if we assign the agreement. The risk is also limited in time because it would run\nfrom the moment we assigned the agreement until the final payment is made, which even if we assigned\nimmediately after signing, would only be 11 1/2 months.\n\nShall I agree to Gagosian’s request that Narrows/AP Narrows remain liable even if they assign the\nagreement?\n\nI’m in the office if you would like to discuss this, but I would love to get back to Gagosian ASAP so we\ncan have this agreement signed today.\n\nThanks,\n\nHeather"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "lets look at funding the art partnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 inveestment. and\nthe same amoiunt of value from trust. leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. . later\nwe can amend and add ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt_396
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt
subject:
  Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\n\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\n\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent\nof population...\n\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\n\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or\nthink tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt_406
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4, 2011 4:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow.\nMy telephone numbers are i or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. EE says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led {J upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed to copy her."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt_413
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-landing-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you told me you were worried about space and i told you not to worry, he will decimate climate change . and support, verifiable projects."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 12:27:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was never worried about space.. I always knew he was enamored with human space exploration because it is big and showy.. I even wrote that in print early on.. for him that is science.. it isn't for those of us who know.. it is more bad news as far as I am concerned because this big budget will decimate real science.. 900 million cut in DOE office fo science will kill particle physics.. will end funding for me, for example.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt_416
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt
subject: Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2019 1:23:55 PM", "subject": "Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns", "body": "• https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/tax-expert-tells-congress-there-lot-find-trump-s-tax-n969121"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt_418
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-megowan/ the same boies that represents | who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as aninsurance co. --_ ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help ;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Boies, Voila.", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html. Unclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:49:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "MONEY '!!!! he lost the fee for hank greenburg, and needed money for his firm. if you look into boies and AIG you will find the answer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt_427
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt
subject: Fwd: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmier", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:47:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt_433
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt
subject: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:39:39 PM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able \nto do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a \nsense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have \nsome thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you \nframe your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical \nproficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the \nlines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps \nsome social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive \neffort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely \nbe unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp \nup the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered \nbefore. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt_439
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In \na sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I \nhave some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll \nsurely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will \namp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've \nencountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt_443
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt
subject: Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cs", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabu", "Januiz Banasiak [janusz53@me.com]", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby", "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2012 2:41:02 PM", "subject": "Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "Lesley,\n\nPlease inform JEE, Vice President Biden is in West Palm Beach and is schedule to depart between 5pm and 6pm today. He parks at Galaxy ramp also in Palm Beach. The airport will be closed between 5pm and 6pm. Flight time is 2+21min.\n\nwe'll need wheels up at 4pm or 2pm. Pls advise which time je prefers?\n\nThank you,\n\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Larr", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabuyo", "Januiz Banasiak", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "Sep 28, 2012 10:33 AM", "subject": "3:00 wheels up!!", "body": "JE has moved wheels up to 3pm today!\nLArry, please confirm\n\nAlso, Larry please confirm you will organize pick up in PB upon the arrival today"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt_444
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "On May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "send details ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt_446
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis TS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\n\nemmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis TS", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They r all jumping ship - its totally crazy - it's time to worry\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:57:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I hear Kelly Ann Conway next\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033586.txt_447
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033586.txt
subject: Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 9:25:10 PM", "subject": "Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!", "body": "Donald Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia\n\nClinton attacks Trump's foreign policy as 'dangerously incoherent’ 1 /27U.S. Democratic presidential candidate\nHillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump's foreign policy platform as \"dangerously incoherent\" in a speech on\nThursday that cast her Republican rival as both a dangerous and laughable figure.\n\nA former U.S. secretary of state, Clinton attacked Trump for his policies and his character, suggesting Trump\nmight start a nuclear war if elected to the White House simply because \"someone got under his very thin skin.\"\n\"Donald Trump's ideas are not just different, they are dangerously incoherent,\" she said to a room of supporters\nin San Diego, California. \"They're not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and\noutright lies.”\n\n© Mike Blake U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech on national\nsecurity in San Diego, California, United States June 2, 2016.\n\nClinton, the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, delivered her speech as\nshe seeks to shift her attention to the Nov. 8 election against likely rival Trump and away from Bernie Sanders,\na U.S. senator from Vermont, who is continuing his longshot bid for the nomination.\n\nTrump, the Republicans’ presumptive nominee, has said he would sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong\nUn to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program and has criticized the decades-old NATO alliance with mainly\nEuropean nations as obsolete and too costly for the United States.\n\nClinton derided these and other positions, promising she would do a better job keeping the United States safe\nand standing in front of a backdrop of 19 large U.S. flags, an unusual abundance even by the standards of\npresidential campaign events.\n\nTrump, a billionaire businessman who has never held elected office or worked in government before, says he\nhas experience dealing with foreign governments through setting up hotels, resorts, golf courses and beauty\npageants in foreign countries. Clinton, who is also a former U.S. senator and former first lady, mocked this.\n\"He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,\" she said to loud\nlaughter.\n\nTrump has talked tough on foreign policy. He has said he would bring back waterboarding and other brutal\ninterrogation techniques for terrorism suspects that are widely regarded as torture and were discontinued by\nDemocratic President Barack Obama.\n\nHe has also vowed to renegotiate trade deals, called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country, and\nsaid he would ask members of the 28-nation NATO alliance to \"pay up” or \"get out.\"\n\nTrump has criticized Clinton for her handling of foreign policy during her 2009-2013 stint as foreign secretary,\nincluding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that\nkilled the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.\n\nHe cites Clinton's support for the Iraq war - launched by former Republican President George W. Bush - as\nanother example of her shortcomings.\n\nAta rally Wednesday night in Sacramento, California, Trump said he had seen a copy of Clinton's speech and\n\"it was such lies about my foreign policy.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt_456
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt
subject: RE: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Katka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She’s shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Katka", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:21:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie’s like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60’s and 70’s."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt_459
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Oh my goodness. I'm so sorry about these accusations. I wish there was a way to make them stop but glad that\nthe truth surfaced.\nShe sounds troubled for sure. Did you even know her?\n\nHope your trip went well ----"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ugh\n\nHopefully this nonsense stops NOW!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt_460
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is not trustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commision it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017 at 11:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "alcoholic . drugs. unstable . consumate liar. CAREFUL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gosh I don't drink and I never did drugs"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030118.txt_463
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030118.txt
subject:
  Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Ob, sorry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think Iam pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 11:45:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028757.txt_464
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028757.txt
subject: Re: press
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I am glad to see you managed to find a way to improve your reputation in the press. Your concern and charitable\ncontributions are touching...\n\nYou forgot about everyone else your actions affected and the promises you made to fix it, but you clearly make an\neffort to improve your own image with contributions you can parade in the press. Congratulations.\n\nI suppose the few people who actually cared enough to put their lives and reputation on the line for you can fend for\nthemselves. I will never understand your priorities...\n\nHave a nice trip."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 26, 2012, at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I have not seen this, not my doing. as you guessed I am not very well.. I hope you are. 1 believe in you."}, {"sender": "Mi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:08", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I told you I wasn't when you asked and then ignored me.\nWhat do you need?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 26 2012 06:30 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "i would appreciate it if you would stop being aggressive and accusatory, with me."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt_473
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 10:12:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028926.txt_477
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028926.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "dkiesq"], "timestamp": "3/19/2015 8:40:59 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:54 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sullivan, John", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI'm John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I've been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan\nJohn Sullivan\nReporter\n1150 15th Street NW\nWashington DC 20071\nPhone:\nMobile:\nEmail"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt_482
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2016 1:05:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast!\nnot sure how trump wins without PA.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt_487
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt
subject: Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 1:41:49 AM", "subject": "Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics", "body": "In case you missed it- Nick \nhttps://www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/politics/sdny-subpoena-trump-inauguration-committee/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt_488
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando", "Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:28:14 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [landon.thomas@nytimes.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in\nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he\nhad been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been\nmanufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that\nis what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with\nhim. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012035.txt_500
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012035.txt
subject: FW: Victoria
messages:
  [{"sender": "Abi Schwinck", "recipients": ["Pink", "Jean Luc Brunel", "Jeff Fuller"], "timestamp": "16/01/2015 05:16 (GMT+07:00)", "subject": "FW: Victoria", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Erik Bechtol <erik@pageparkes.com>", "recipients": ["Abi Schwinck"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:12 PM", "subject": "Victoria", "body": "Hey Abi!\n\nHope you’re well. :) I’ve just had a conversation with Victoria, and she isn't comfortable\nremaining with MC2 with all the drama going on right now in the press. She's asked me to\ncontact you on her behalf. Please let me know if you see any issue with this. Thanks so much!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028780.txt_517
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028780.txt
subject: TRUMP / POPE SCORECARD .....
messages:
  [{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "TRUMP / POPE SCORECARD .....", "body": "TRUMP I POPE\n\nCORE: Jennie Enterprise |\nwww.coreaccess.net |\n@dandjenterprise | Founder & Chairman | 66 East 55th Street New York NY 10022 | Main:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt_519
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tor"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "???\n\nJEE"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he’s the real deal.\n\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, any wordon karyyna plans. . can you belive MBS sent mea TENT carpets and all."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:07:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Will call Japan tonite. A tent? Hmmm... | think that is code for ‘I love you’. Or, maybe code for ‘go pound sand’. Better check your KSA urban dictionary."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028958.txt_522
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028958.txt
subject: Re: following up: WA poetry release
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis <LeahReisDennis@unknown>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years ago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we would love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1jxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVDbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basic+Clip+for+Viewing.mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed conversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\nAl Gore\nJohn McCain\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\nMayor Tom Menino\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\nSir Mervyn King\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has underway to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United States and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television series we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a series of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and for their students."}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 5:58:45 PM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised- both subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions. Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter project with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt_523
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:24:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt_527
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt
subject: Re: Huffington Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffiey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jul 01 07:18:25 2011", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn is Andrews accuser, long criminal record, total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or reporters to investigate,., the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone answerer„ she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs ridiculous, but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "If you rewrite your last email in better grammar, (and so I have a better understanding) I can cut and paste and send it to Arianna Huffmgton from me\nDid you know why Prince Albert's Charlene fled to the airport with a one way ticket back to South Africa? Because she found out about a third illegitimate child that is 3 months old...the palace officials followed her to the airport and propably made her an offer she could not refuse.. will get details from Jim Coleman when he comes home Sunday night.\nIn Southampton now. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal <I_>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 1 2011 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "I think a great opportunity has arisen. Just like the headlines of a hotel maid now proven to have lied in the Stauss Kahn case. The girl who accused Prince Andrew can also easily be proven to be a liar. I think Buckingham Palace would love it . You should task someone to investigate the girl Virginia Roberts, that has caused the Queens son all this agro. I promise you she is a fraud. you and i will be able to go to ascot for the rest of our lives. I know there is a public police report that no one has had the courage to publish, as they do not want to be seen attacking a \" vicitm\", but being falsely accused will be the new headline"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt_528
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt
subject: Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2016 3:37:10 AM", "subject": "Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-fills-white-house-counsel-and-deputy-national-security-posts/2016/11/25/c4dee8d2-b341-11e6-belc-Scec35blad25_story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt_532
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
subject: told you
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 10:17:45 PM", "subject": "told you", "body": ""}, {"sender": "NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to\nthis e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n*** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits\nattorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of\nall documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees\napply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first\nviewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not\napply.\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\n\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of\nCivil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-\ncaptioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document\nfiled by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt_541
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt_545
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt
subject: Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide I Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/10/2019 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt_560
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nNewsmax.com  \nLaffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the \nnation's economic woes is to adopt \"common-sense\" Reaganomics, the policy's architect Arthur Laffer claims \nin an exclusive Newsmax interview. \nLaffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama's former Council of \nEconomic Advisors' chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing. \n\"Reaganomics would fix any economy that's in the doldrums,\" Laffer said. \"It's not a magic sauce, it's \ncommon sense. \n\"You've got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business \nnet sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That's number one. \n\"Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not \ncure unemployment. \n\"Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I've ever \nheard of,\" Laffer said. \n\"Number four you need regulations, but you don't need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and \ncreate collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here. \n\"And lastly you need free trade,\" Laffer said. \"Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we \nproduce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn't sell them those things \nwe produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.\" \nIn the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor's was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit \nrating — in fact it should have done so far earlier. \nThe agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody's and Fitch, don't do the same they won't be doing \ntheir jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of \ngovernment revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes. \n______`If you had a company that had revenues of $21/2 million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in \nsight, $11/2 million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what \nwould you rate that company? I surely wouldn't rate it AAA. \n\"That is the U.S. situation today,\" Laffer said. \"Taxes are about $21/2 trillion, government spending is about $4 \ntrillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don't see that as being a AAA country. \n\"If the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.\" \nLaffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are \ncompletely turned around. He said President Barack Obama's administration's only economic plan seemed to \nbe to expand government ownership of the means of production. \n\"They have nationalized the health care industry pretty extensively. They've done that with home building as \nwell. They've tried it with the auto industry as well. So they have moved very, very deliberatively and \npurposefully toward extending the government ownership of the means of production. \n\"That to me, if you read the tealeaves, is what they are doing. It is not what they are saying they are doing, but \nthat is what they actually are doing. \n\"People don't work to pay taxes, people work to get what they can after taxes. It's that very private incentive \nthat motivates them to work. If you pay people not to work and tax them if they do work, don't be surprised if \nyou find a lot of people not working.\" \nLaffer said the current economic woes started to form under President George W. Bush but have been made \nworse by Obama's policies. \n\"There's a wedge driven between wages paid and wages received and that wedge is the tax/government \nspending wedge,\" he said. \n\"That wedge has grown dramatically in the last 4 1/2 years...under W and a Republican administration \nand...under Obama. Bipartisan ignorance has led us to this very disastrously desolate state.\" \nLaffer had high praise for the role the tea party has played in bringing the problem of the deficits to the fore. \n\"The tea party is not the problem, the tea party may well be the solution,\" he said. \"They are critical to the \nfuture of the country in a positive way. They are the only fiscally sound people I know out there all the time. \n\"I don't know that I would go as far as they go on a lot of issues but I surely respect their movement very \nmuch.\" \nAnd he said any one of the group of Republicans vying for the party's nomination for the White House would \nmake\" a great president.\" \n\"Tim Pawlenty is spectacular. Newt Gingrich knows more about issues than anyone you've ever seen. Michele \nBachmann is out-of-sight wonderful,\" he said. \n\"Rick Perry is second to no one in this stuff If you look at Herman Cain, he's phenomenal. \n\"Oh and (Jon) Huntsman was a great governor of the state of Utah and is a phenomenally experienced \nintellectual competent man. \n\"When you look at the Republican candidates, you see a group of people who are absolutely outstanding in \nattributes.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt_568
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "A tiCsSCS"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028964.txt_574
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028964.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 20, 2016, at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "barnaby and I will come up april 1"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "3/20/2016 7:33:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m around.\n\nThat’s the day that Anonymous is supposed to take down Trump’s page.\nJust saying.\n\n- Joi"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt_577
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt
subject:
  FW: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2", "Michael", "Charles", "TO ROGER STONE"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE\n\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt_579
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2017 11:08:13 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Great talking. Covered lots. All fun!\n\nAttached is the Shanghai Science of Consciousness program (Stuart Hameroff put together; I advised).\n\nGregory Chaitin on Closer To Truth - https://www.closertotruth.com/contributor/gregory-chaitin/profile (scroll down for videos).\n\nMy Bloomberg TV on Trump/China (Feb. 1, pre Trump-Xi call)\n\n- https://www.dropbox.com/s/o06wvejllmsi917/Dr%20Kuhn%20Bloomberg%20Daybreak%20-%20Asia.mov?dl=0 -\n\nAppreciate discussing “Science of Sleep & Dreams” - I'l pull together significance of recent research/discoveries yielding inflection point, such that timing is propitious for the definitive TV series benchmarking the field and making impact.\n\nWarmest, Robert"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.txt_583
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Bo"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Lets start. |]. am aware that you are currently angry at the world. . me, karp wechsler. even\nyourself, all willing absorbers of the current high heat. (though you ,calling me ,Debra , did take away some\nofthe sting) Iam sorry to see you this way.\n\nemblematic ; I was asked to opine on whether to hire castrucci. an hour after I gave a preliminary yes. . I\ncalled you then texted you that i had thought more about it and changed my mind. The next day brad called\nand asked for my vote. I told him ,in no uncertain terms itisano , I categorically vote no. I called\n\nyou . youcame to see me. I said it was a bad idea. you said you were going to do it anyway , I said and\nfollowed up in writing ITIS A MISTAKE. and added Please don't come back to me with anything suggesting\notherwise , you and I should be clear I think it is wrong . A very strong NO . you of course can hire whomever\nyou like.\n\nearly on I told you I thought Tom remarkably careless . Eilleen goofy and your art lawyer not well informed to\nsay the least. you told me Tom was a senior partner. Eileen had headed the trading desk , and Ralph Lerner had\nto know what he was doing as he wrote the book. . I said I thought you deserved better ,should get better\npeople and no , am not an HR person. yesterday you told me that the reason you have hired whomver you\ncould find was to avoid being dependent on me. a decision by far , not the best place to try to save money )\nJoslin- who you say I hired. I neither found nor hired. With a two person given choice I approved joslin over\nsome woman that eileen preferred. against my repeated advice you and eileen decided the pay range at under\n300k. I told you at that time that I would personally pay the difference for a higher quality person, that was\nyears ago. I have sent over a hundred emails to you clearly saying he needs to be closely managed by\nbetter professionals. initially , that referred to Eillen and Ada.and after, brad. john etc. THere are\nmany emails each and every month from me, telling you , he is slipping failing cracking fragile. . crazy, nuts,\nheading towards incompetence. Unless YOU- TAKE ACTION! when I pressured him for accurate numbers ,\nyou told him, to tell me, that he works for you and NOT for me.. When I continued to press for accuracy from\nyour office , you told me that they were now all afraid of me and i should let brad communicate any requests, (\nyou now tell me \" we know what Brad is\"?). When I told you you office needs to be reviewed and changed you\ntold me i was being destructive rather than constructive. when 1 ultimately confronted joslin, in an attempt to\nprotect you, told him that his numbers were wildly inaccurate , you told me that i had caused his ultimate\nresignation and now have an affirmative obligation to fill in the resultant gap.\nI did give you a bad number , and apologized as soon as i realized it. an error that was an embarrassment for me\n, the fact that that the accurate number is still way below what you agreed to pay , has fallen by the\nwayside.( the preposterous argument that the end of year transaction was Alans idea , which you now know\nwas not true and that me not receiving Phaidon documents was unexplainable. was your justification\nthough, for non - full payment )\n\nHopefully You will recall that when you initially asked for my help. I declined repeatedly with the\nadmonition that that having a financial arrangement is fraught with danger and could complitcate our\nfriendship (as you will be unhappy paying what you will view as a large sum. while choosing to ignore"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt_591
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt
subject: Re: NYT
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehbarak <111111>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff \nAbout time for our actions to turn into theatre and movie pieces. \nShall we talk? Any news from BC/AdR? \nBest \nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehbarak"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 16:06", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/theater/oslo-broadway-review.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumbsquare&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F04%2F13%2Ftheater%2Foslo-broadway-review.html&eventName=Watching-article-click\nJEE"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "30 Apr 2017, at 19:43", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "both have the flu"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/30/2017 8:23:59 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "High stress."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030614.txt_596
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030614.txt
subject: Re: any fun?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: any fun?", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: any fun?", "body": "Different kind of fun. \nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings! \nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft. \nHow are you? \nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030600.txt_605
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030600.txt
subject:
  Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["gmax", "Ross Gow"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 at 5:09 AM", "subject": "Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702]", "body": "Dear Ghislaine \n\nBelow is a link to today's Mail.\n\nThe allegations are getting worse - this is not a storm you can ride by not making any statement out and get your life back. You have friends saying they don't believe you would act in this way and you need to say that you did not. \n\nThe Mail website is read by 193 million I don't see how a statement denying the allegations will make matters worse which is the acid test. It will make your position better as you will a strong open denial on record. These allegations must not gain traction.\n\nI wont say anymore as I have given my advice - call me.\n\nBest\n\nPhilip \n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2900787/Prince-Andrew-Heidi-Klum-Hookers-Pimps-party-New-York-socialite-accused-procuring-underage-girls-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <GMax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702]", "body": "I am going o have to make a statement – I will send it to you – I don’t have a choice"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["G Maxwell <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 2:52:36 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702]", "body": "Ok , tie it to the easily disproved Clinton"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023302.txt_606
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023302.txt
subject: Fw: Fw: sched
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM", "subject": "fee", "body": "I wouldn’t mind attending a meeting or portion of a meeting with JE. If he is the mastermind, and you want to move quickly, it might get a lot of questions resolved quickly."}, {"sender": "Brad Wechsler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:37 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "On different subject: general time frame is: docs (notes and purchase and sale agreement to you tomorrow end. of biz); incorporate your comments monday and get docs to trust attorney tuesday; contemporaneously meet in person with you tuesday or wednesday and do a dry run. On these days ada will also take the trustees through outline of docs they will receive thursday. Docs to trustees, leon et al on thursday and signatures gathered by friday for first close 12/22. Tight but doable. Ada, alan agree?\n\nPS: ada, you shld begin to think abt where people are (jh, rr, bc, Idb) next week."}, {"sender": "Heather Gray", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Fw:", "body": "No, ’m meeting with him at 9:30 am tomorrow."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "elegant solution ;re fee. , 30 million paid now. with purchase of noel kalb, paid with funds from the drawdown. you should use and keep open the line for the full 30m and leave it outstanding until its expiration. in four months. legit biz reason, very nice , - the balance of the fee - paid inkind either low basis art . or interest in either milenium ,lone cascade ,or king street."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "saved you 500k at the last minute, . brad has had the same chart since march 16th, its his job to review NOT MINE .appears he is one of those living in the dark leiwe. I found 8 million dollars today, missed deductions. . not yet in the numbers, .?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "1 did the paul weiss bill get paid ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today important\n\n10m paid today to gratitude america, a 501 c 3, willl make last year complete. 20 million paid today ftc . 10 million july 15 5 million sept 30. ,5 millionjan 1 forall of 16. tax savings paid at 37 percent . of net. savings. 50 million credit. net. so 150 million free. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033579.txt_608
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033579.txt
subject: Re: new schedule
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visosk", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/5/2017 12:32:54 AM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "Monday 4pm confirmed\n\nPres Trump departs Monday at 11am,. TFR in place until 11:30am Monday, which requires 24 hour notice for\nDeparture screening if departing during TFR hours.,\nTFR (Temporally Flight Restriction),\n\nOur departure time of 4:30 PM will not be impacted since TFR expires 11:30am Monday,,.\n\nFYI,\n\nFriday, Josh left voicemail indicating chevron should present purchase agreement by midday Monday. for your\nreview.\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 4, 2017, at 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "monday 4 pmtolsj, thurs morning pre clear to palm beach. sunday 12 new york . tues paris to 21 new\nyork. 24 santa fe. -march 1"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032667.txt_610
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032667.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "nn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time.\nthnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["nn"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["nn"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["nn"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "nn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["nn"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 10:32:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very Welle &"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026676.txt_613
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026676.txt
subject: Re: long time, no talk...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["GREG FARRELL (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: )"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: long time, no talk...", "body": "In trial in sdny"}, {"sender": "Greg Farrell (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:54 AM", "subject": "long time, no talk...", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nper my vm, I'm chasing a few DC-related legal stories and was hoping you\nmight be able to help me out.\n\nGot any time in the next few days?\n\nThanks,\n\nGreg\n\np.s. Any word from Bernie E? Given Skilling's reduction, Bernie certainly\ndeserves a second look, no?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028970.txt_623
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028970.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["‘Martin G. Weinberg’"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nSorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Roy Black"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:51:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031278.txt_625
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031278.txt
subject:
  PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nTO ROGER STONE\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS CO VER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BOOK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !nu\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM.\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !Hu"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Thanks,\nRegards,\nDarren"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren:"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:27 AM", "subject": "PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029437.txt_626
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029437.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "you and Chapman"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 7:36:39 PM", "subject": "", "body": "attached a message i just sent to President Struppa of Chapman—i am certain that your gift will do the trick—\nand that the West Coast is indeed more convivial and supportive than the East \ni hope i did not f... up your contact with Finkelstein \nCarlos told me of the devastation to your island—pretty much as i feared \nam amused (at a safe distance) as Bannon takes on Trump—he responds as he always does, threatening a suit he \nwill not in fact file \nno internet in my home or nearby in the great, retarded country of Jamaica so i am now at a restaurant some 35 \nminutes away and only go on-line twice a day—hoping that i will work instead \nall best"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt_631
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt
subject: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 7:11:08 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": "----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Wolfe, Alexandra\" [•\nSent: 03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\nSubject: RE:"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\nMartin Weinberg\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on\nthe phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he\ncould tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the\ninformation I already have by you or him.\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the\nsame clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\nThank you,\nJay"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033358.txt_633
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033358.txt
subject: "SNL": Baldwin's Trump, De Niro's Mueller season 44 finale cold open - Axios
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2019 10:21:24 AM", "subject": "\"SNL\": Baldwin's Trump, De Niro's Mueller season 44 finale cold open - Axios", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.axios.com/snl-alec-baldwin-trump-dont-stop-me-now-60e0839e-68f5-4ce5-af36-8635dfcb694c.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029887.txt_648
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029887.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt_651
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 7:35:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029893.txt_653
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029893.txt
subject: Re: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [iy", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell [iy"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [mailto", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell [iy"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:57 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022947.txt_661
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022947.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 3:10:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help;)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032052.txt_668
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032052.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about Ef Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because I was in your visitors list but somers and Margo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off I have never been in a big book before and I think it would have been great and they never even asked me I told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful j"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth of the claims. unvierstiy of virgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape accusation no penaltiy etc. mine is ripe with same"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there,If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031303.txt_675
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031303.txt
subject:
  RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Darren:"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nThanks,\nRegards,\n\nDarren"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030454.txt_679
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030454.txt
subject: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 7 2011 04:18 PM", "subject": "FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\n\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jagger and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - or this email address.\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt_680
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is she in dc today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:51:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not a good time"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030332.txt_681
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030332.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2014, at 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Administration officials were firm that President Obama was only beginning to think about a new\nattorney general, but many in Washington are already focusing on Kathryn Ruemmler, the former\nWhite House counsel, who recently returned to private practice.\n\nMs. Ruemmiler, 43, is known to be highly trusted by the president, and she helped guide his thinking on\ngay rights, the health care law and the reach of executive authority.\n\nShe is one of only three women to serve as White House counsel.\n\nMs. Ruemmler, who grew up in Washington State and studied law at Georgetown, also has a history of\nwinning over skeptical Republicans. “You never had to question where she was coming from, and she\nnever volunteered something she didn’t know,” said Senator Saxby Chambliss, Republican of Georgia.\n“She is very precise but very firm also, and held her own well.”\n\nShe also won admirers as a lead prosecutor on the Enron task force. But if Ms. Ruemmler is nominated,\nthe advice she dispensed to the White House about the I.R.S. scandal and the attacks on Benghazi, Libya,\nwill certainly draw scrutiny."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 26 2014 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I saw that."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029663.txt_682
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029663.txt
subject: Re: After Words
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating qq", "recipients": ["Dear Friends"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:21 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book ‘After Words’. He truly is\nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was\nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. | will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read.\n\n| trust this email finds you well.\n\nKindest regards\n\nKatherine X\n\nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 10:50:46 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "where are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt_696
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt
subject: Re: Essays
messages:
  [{"sender": "Edward Rod Larsen", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/30/2018 1:06:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "will do"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "essay 1. change next to the last sentence. Similarly. ....... to I look forward to accessing the cultural resources in New York in order that I may continue my cultural journey."}, {"sender": "Edward Rod Larsen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "Essay 1.\nComing from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I believe that the international profile of NYU will provide the best environment for my college education, with the added benefit of returning to the place where I've spent most of my childhood and where my mother will be posted as Norwegian Ambassador to the UN in January 2019.\n\nNYU's Art History department appeals to me because of its wide range of courses, from the global art of antiquity to the contemporary. My passion is the Italian Renaissance and the rich history behind it, especially the works of 15th century masters such as Masaccio and Bellini. Some of the courses that NYU offers such as \"Early masters of Italian Renaissance painting\" and \"Florentine Villas: An Interpretation Based on Historical, Social Factors\" are, therefore appealing to me. What I find exciting, is not only the visual aesthetics and analysis of these masterpieces, but also the manner in which the Renaissance emphasised scientific and economic innovation, areas of study the Global Liberal Arts programme would offer. NYU's unique campus in Florence would give me a once in lifetime opportunity to spend a year immersing myself in the art, culture and history of Italy. This would be an exciting experience to have while studying for a Bachelor's degree in Art History, and would compliment my main interests in the subject.\n\nAs one of the prime cultural centres in the world, NYU's location in NYC is the perfect place to broaden knowledge within contemporary art. I am very much looking forward to visiting the Whitney Biennia this May. In addition the New museum, which shows a lot of the kind of work I find interesting is a short walk away from campus.\n\nTaking advantage of being based in central London for the past year, I have completed the Chairman's Programme at Christies, work experience at the Courtauld Gallery and I will be working at Maddox Gallery in the near future. Similarly, I want to take advantage of being based in NYC to gain as much experience as possible. I have chosen to apply Early Decision to NYU as it is the only American university I will be applying to, as there is no better place to obtain experience of the contemporary art world than New York City.\n\nEssay 2.\nFrom the age of extremes to the age of bewilderment\nWhat captivates me more than anything else is the different ideological phases of the 20th century and how art can be used as a tool of advancement and reflection on ideological and political developments.\n\nMy fascination began when I read; Eric Hobsbawm's \"Age Of Extremes\" and has since developed through books such as Benjamin Carter Heft's \"The Death Of Democracy\" and Yuval Harari \"A Brief History Of Tomorrow\" and \"21 Lessons For The 21st Century\".\n\nIn the years after the First World War, until the end of the Second World War, three political models for shaping the future of nation states emerged; Fascism, Communism and liberal democracy. These all offered great ideas for the future of the world. Fascism and Communism shared some common features: authoritarian, strong leaders and a belief that their revolutions had to be carried through with violence. This led to the mass murders in the Nazi concentration camps and in the Soviet Gulags.\n\nIn the mid war periods, the \"Litfass columns\" that were originally designed to carry advertising, became the outdoor galleries for the war of ideologies. The political poster was born. High quality posters from every political party in Germany popped up on the columns. Hitler's propaganda chief G8ebels stated that the Nazi election campaign should be run through speeches and posters. The other parties responded in kind. An art form thus became an essential political tool in the battle for votes.\n\nThe propagandist Art used by the Nazis and communists alike was essential in helping sell their message to the masses. Indeed, much of the art that was critical of these movements was suppressed or censored and \"subversive\" artists cowed, in some cases imprisoned or even worse.\n\nThe liberal democratic model departed sharply from these authoritarian perspectives by presenting the alternative of free and transparent elections, the rule of law and freedom of speech. In the mid-war period the three narratives were competing to be the conceptual frame for society. After the Second World War fascism was crushed leaving the two competing ideologies of communism and liberal democracy. After the demise of communism in 1989, through to the late 1990's, liberal democracy was victorious in the idealogical battlefield. Some historians, like Francis Fukuyama, went so far as to proclaim this period as \"the end of history\".\n\nA key piece of art that championed this kind of ideology was Sheppard Fairey's campaign poster for Barack Obama. In this poster, Fairey, a well established graffiti artist uses urban colours and stencilling techniques combined with the message \"HOPE\" to promote the incoming presidents positive values and popularity with the young. It is notable that Fairey's most recent political poster protests the Trump presidency rather than promote it.\n\nWith the rise of so called \"illiberal democracy\", with strong parties standing for populist ideologies, we have now moved into what can be described as the age of bewilderment. We were not in fact at the \"end of history\". Once again the future looks unpredictable and insecure and artists are responding in different ways.\n\nJeremy Deller, a British Turner prize winning artist created a work which features a car damaged in the bombing of the historic Mutanabbi Street book market, which resulted in the deaths of 38 people. Here, an art work has been used to show the aftermath of an event. This event was the result of the Iraq war, which was seen as a way to spread democracy. Here Art is used as a means by which to explore the effects of ideology rather than promote it, another really interesting area in the study of the intersections between ideology and art.\n\nExploring how art reflects the historical and ideological contexts of the world around it is fascinating to me and I would love to study these ideas in more depth at undergraduate level."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030326.txt_698
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030326.txt
subject: Congressional candidate compares Melania Trump to prostitute
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/1/2018 1:34:05 PM", "subject": "Congressional candidate compares Melania Trump to prostitute", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/07/31/congressional-candidate-compares-melania-trump-to-prostitute/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20180801&mpweb=755-7157445-719004712\n\nCongressional candidate compares Melania\n\nTrump to prostitute\nBy Chris Perez\n\nA congressional candidate from Oregon has caused an uproar on social media after\ncomparing first lady Melania Trump to a prostitute.\n\n“Did you know the First Lady works by the hour?” tweeted independent House candidate\nMark Roberts on Monday, using the hashtags “#thinkdirty” and “#hoebag.”\n\nTwitter users were quick to blast the politician for his crude comment, with some calling on\nhim to pull out of the 2nd Congressional District race for Republican incumbent Greg\nWalden’s seat.\n\n“Very unprofessional on your part,” tweeted one person. “Grow up and stick to the issues, so\nthe voters in your district can decide on your stand regarding the issues.”\n\nAnother added, “Wow no class Mark. You’re definitely using liberal tactics and it makes me\nwonder if you really are a conservative at all.”\n\nRoberts sparked the social media storm on Monday afternoon after replying to a tweet from\nCharlie Kirk, president of the right-wing youth organization Turning Point USA. Kirk had\ncompared Melania’s staff numbers to those of former first lady Michelle Obama.\n\n“Did you know: There are thirty-nine fewer staffers dedicated to The First Lady of the\nUnited States (FLOTUS) than under Obama,” Kirk tweeted, referencing data reported in\nJanuary.\n\n“There are only five staffers dedicated to Melania Trump vs. forty-four staffers who served\nMichelle Obama,” he said."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032708.txt_699
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032708.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2018 11:04:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just passing reference that you, Tom Barrack, and Trump were once friends. One mention. No inference."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "am i mentioned in the book? ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029190.txt_703
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029190.txt
subject: Re: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Michael Braun"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of Time.. or I could speak about Science in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer?\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time.\nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to make clear where your talk will go for..\nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus on ORIGINES.\nI do look forward to having you here again!\nAs ever Jakob\nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do.\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob\nThere has been a complication. The G6ttingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I am going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I thought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket.\nLawrence."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a discount ticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the event in UK with Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a dialogue at your place whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more money perhaps..\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2018, at 10:04 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the ticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to buy out the old ticket before they cancel it.\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\".\nAs promised you will get my message promptly.\nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget implies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily on amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before deadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum).\nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment.\nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines.\nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come.\nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 cancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the other place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am going to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could take a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to upgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:56 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 7:07:18 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "please call me asap"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029111.txt_706
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029111.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Nov 22, 2017, at 10:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "all good?"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Pretty good. Had a pinched nerve in my neck that screwed me up for awhile. How about you? Any plans to come to Boston?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Nov 22, 2017, at 10:57", "subject": "Re:", "body": "maybe week of 3rd not seeing anything that exciting ornew ? you? with all these guys getting busted for harassment , 1 have moved slightly up on the repuation ladder and have been asked everday for advice etc. this morning I have Ken Starr coming to point out how if clinton cigar lewinsky were to be outed today the world would be a different place"}, {"sender": "Joi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/22/2017 6:14:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lots of stuff going on that week but I’m in town.\n\n#metoo is quite amazing...\n\nMadars is doing well. His PhD paper won an award and he found a vulnerability in ING’s new crypto currency."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt_707
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt
subject: Re: B727 deal
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/12/2013 9:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "I spoke to my FAA in Orlando, it will take the buyer 6 months to obtain a FAR125 certificate if we do not include ours, \nDarren and Rich are working on possibility of including JEGE, INC with sale of Boeing, this will be valuable to buyer and \nprove to be beneficial monetarily to you if we can include the company name in the sale. FAA informs me its taken \nunder into consideration on a case by case basis if they will approve another buyer to operate my FAR125 certificate. My \nFAA inspector did mention that Trump did the same deal when he purchased his B757, it included the manuals and \ncompany."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 3:37 pm", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "ok to all"}, {"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI spoke to Gary and he agrees to make a counter offer, do you agree with the following: \n-Counter the offer at $2.750M \n-deal to include my FAR125 certificate, along with the company name: JEGE, Inc. this provides the buyer with ease of \ntransition and keeps the B727 on its current FAR125, tremendous value to buyer,. \n-Buyer understands purchase is \"As Is\" but has the opportunity to visually inspect the aircraft in Palm Bch along with my \nrecords. \n-closing to be on December 30th 2013. \n-Buyer will pay round trip repositioning expense Brunswick GA to Palm Beach and return to Brunswick if buyer declines \nthe aircraft (fuel cost round trip $14,930.00). \n-Seller will deduct the reposition expense if buyer proceeds with purchase. (fuel expense to fly B727 to Palm Beach is \n$7,465.00). \nis this approved? \nthank you,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291.txt_710
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291.txt
subject: Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/14/2015 11:56:48 PM", "subject": "Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-\npedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031734.txt_724
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031734.txt
subject: good and bad
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2017 3:54:45 PM", "subject": "good and bad", "body": "Jeffrey \nin a mixed state \non the up side i now have an excellent agent, am adding two chapters to my expanded memoir that deal with 1. \nmy first five famous papers and 2. my work on genetic conflict within ourselves; so there is a good chance i can \nsell the book by this summer to a publisher and start reaping some money off it \na friend at Cornell has now contacted me regarding a special senior fellowship they have and i remain hopeful \nthat i will soon be relaxing with the famously beautiful women of Aarhus by late September \non the downside, Jamaica is increasingly dangerous, murder rate climbing once again, about 6th highest in \nworld \nand i encounter a lot of racism, especially from young thugs—not so much hostility as disrespect—they regard \nme as an easy target—that old white man nah know nothing, we can rob him or do as we please \nyesterday morning at 7am very hostile encounter at an ATM machine, no overt attempt to rob me or i would \nhave shot him dead, just cursing me and my mother out because he had to wait an extra minute or two while i \ndid my transaction—all my Jamaican male friends agree that he would not have acted that way toward a dark-\nskinned man \nmakes me reluctant so spend so much time here or to continue to invest in my property \ni hope you are fine, the Trump bump in the market seems to have stalled and i would be curious what you \nthought of the market over the next three years—i will be forcibly retired July 1 but as long as i have \n'employment' (equals fellowships at the moment) for a couple of years i need not spend my retirement money \nwhich will be roughly $900,000; at most i might put 450 grand in an annuity and keep the rest invested \nall the best \nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt_730
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\nxoxo Peggy"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. I am sick as a dog with a cold. I am supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a \ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist? \nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the \nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show \ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on. \nI have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried.. .1have emailed three doctors this morning! \nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call. \nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in \nthe planes. \nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because its 3D. \nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue... its going to be highest grossing film in the world is an \nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow., no cleaning, stay in bed.. sorry.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028582.txt_732
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028582.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030784.txt_737
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030784.txt
subject: Re: What’s up in trump World?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "3/7/2018 12:17:54 PM", "subject": "Re: What’s up in trump World?", "body": "would you like to sit with bannon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:51 AM", "subject": "Re: What’s up in trump World?", "body": "Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office me UU"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033021.txt_751
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033021.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 8:13:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030790.txt_752
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030790.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistan ae also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in\nlondon. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\n\nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give tofJin russia id appreciate it. . dont\nknow parties. ride tolondon . shesa futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "On 12 Jul 2018, at 13:05", "subject": "Re:", "body": "they are lost"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let’s show them the way - Baruch HaShem"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:14:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "they are in south of france for 2 weeks."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021404.txt_757
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021404.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [mail TT]", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nPS\nThank you,\n\nJay"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029609.txt_764
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029609.txt
subject: Re: $25K from ASU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey. \nHow are things? \nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is \ngetting bounced by MIT back to ASU. \nSorry... \n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump \ntypes . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2019 4:08:40 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck! \n- Joi"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030358.txt_770
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030358.txt
subject: Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i know, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i tired to call you , not for email"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "'Thanks for sharing the foxhole'"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic --but to answer a random gmail email, that is not smart!\nHow are you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:35 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "call now --"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027030.txt_777
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027030.txt
subject: Pritzker Alert
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kaczorowski, Monica M.", "recipients": ["Eisenberg, Marshall F.", "Richman, Lawrence"], "timestamp": "May 22, 2013, 8:54:07 PM CDT", "subject": "Pritzker Alert", "body": "WashingtonPost.com\nCopyright 2013 The Washington Post\n\nMay 22, 2013\n\nSection: in-the-loop\n\nObama nominee Penny Pritzker's $80 million mistake\n\nPresident Obama's billionaire nominee to head the Commerce Department, Penny Pritzker, understated her\n\nincome by $80 million.\nEmily Heil"}, {"sender": "Eisenberg, Marshall F.", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd: Pritzker Alert", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Pritzker Alert", "body": "I clearly did something wrong in my last life to have to deal w this bullshit. AND I warned her."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Pritzker Alert", "body": "nice to see you , please come more often"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2013 11:45:14 AM", "subject": "RE: Pritzker Alert", "body": "Always fun."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.txt_786
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.txt
subject: Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness I Law News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren lndyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 8:40:32 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness I Law News", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://lawnewz.com/high-profile/trump-team-fires-back-after-jane-doe-refiles-rape-lawsuit-with-new-\nwitness/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025520.txt_793
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025520.txt
subject: Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Oliver Lane", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adricnne Ro"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "German Media Confess to\nUnderestimating Steve\nBannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous\nas Ever’"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 7:47:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Pretty powerful"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026512.txt_799
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026512.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way out. .. execution not to his liking but on another note , what were you thinking about me in the book, with what moniker"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what I think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of Trump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff Doesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him until the end."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 8:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "take photos"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032913.txt_808
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032913.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals <________________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 11:50:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im in new york tomrow if you want to speak or ill see you tues"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030974.txt_817
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030974.txt
subject: Fwd: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:46:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FYI", "body": "first edit"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff [ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump’s 45 years in business were full of his\nshady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even\njuicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's\nperceived A -level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money\nlaunderers. What’s more, Trump’s own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain\nbillionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle\nschemes. Practically speaking, you couldn’t miss him, as the Mueller investigation\nappeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal\ninvolving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach,\nFlorida for $36 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and\nTrump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade,\nwith Trump always hopeful that Epstein would provide some of his financial expertise to\nenabvle h8im to survive. Trump was beholden to Deutsch Bank and was on the hook\npersonally for 40 million dollars.\n\nEpstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues\ninvolved with moving the swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the\nhouse, an incredulous Epstein saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for\nthe property, buying it through an entity named Trump Properties LLC, ultimate owner\nunknown. . Trump, Epstein knew, had been in the buisness of leasing his name. Hotels are\nactually owned by others but renting the trump name would cost a percent or two. ,\nTrump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate\ntransaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump’s basic business model of\nlicensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein\nsuspected that others actually owned the new house. then getting extensive scrutiny in\nFlorida papers. The disagreement re the purchase of the house became all the more bitter\nwhen, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to\nTrump, who often visited with Epstein at his Palm Beach house, whose visits were\nconfirmed in depostions of Epsteins houseman. It appears that Epstein was visited almost\nevery day, by and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy\nendings—girls recruited, and who often returned to his house from the local massage"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030402.txt_821
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030402.txt
subject: Re: my suggested type of edits. lets talk
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "my suggested type of edits. lets talk", "body": "The Special Counsel's office, nearly leak-proof since its inception more than a year ago and seemingly immune to the President's constant taunts, might appear to be operating in some parallel universe unmoved by the every-day political turmoil. But in the course of conversations I've had recently, as a I research a new book on President Trump and the forces arrayed against him, what has become clear is that Robert Mueller and his office are preparing for a life or death confrontation with the President and the mother of all constitutional crises.\n\nMy discussions have been with both White House advisors and people close to the investigation. No source involved in this story would speak on the record.\n\nThe sources firmly believe that Special Counsel has ready an aggressive legal theory for the indictment of the president for obstruction of Justice. In the last few weeks, as the President has indulged his pardon authority, the Mueller team has also developed a legal strategy to oppose the ikely pardon of former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, who had previously struck a plea bargain which could include his testimony against the President.\n\nRobert Mueller, according to one person familiar with the Special Counsel's thinking, could hardly contain his disgust when Rudy Giuliani, the President's new lawyer—hired to makes a television case for the President and to push back against the Mueller team—in May airily dismissed the notion that a president can be indicted. Adding insult to injury, Giuliani—who a White House source said had likely learned of aspects of the pending indictment—said Mueller agreed with that assessment. White House sources believe Giuliani was daring the Special Counsel to tip his hand. Mueller, in character, contained his outrage and continued to hold his cards close as his team finished preparing the obstruction case and refined the legal theories under which it would claim the right to haul the president into court.\n\nThe Mueller team, according to sources both near the investigation and the White House, has prepared a case, but it requires the approval of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who—with the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions from the Russia-related investigation—oversees the Mueller team. He would need to set aside He could do this based on a finding that the former opinion was inaccurate re the president being above the law. ttherby creating an inability to indict a sitting president. Indeed, Rosenstein, as recently as April, publicly declared that the President was not a target. This may have been a form of fig leaf to soothe a President who regularly demands aides assure him he is not being pursued: the President does not become a formal target until Rosenstein agrees to designate him as one.\n\nAny proposed indictment would confront Rosenstein with matters with which he has been intimately involved. The case, according to my conversations , is fundamentally Trump versus the FBI, Justice Department, and Mueller investigation itself. In many ways, it boils down to the word of former FBI Director James Comey against the word of Donald Trump. Rosenstein, at the President's behest, drafted a memo justifying the Comey firing for how the former FBI Director handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation. But that justification, in an embarrassment for Rosenstein, was shortly brushed aside by the President when he admitted that he fired Comey to disrupt the Russian investigation. What's more, the indictment is said to charge that the firing of Andrew McCabe, the former Deputy Director of the FBI, who reported directly to Rosenstein after the Comey dismissal, was an instance of illegal retaliation tampering or consipracy by the President against a potential witness.\n\nAccording to a source with knowledge of the strategy, it will be all the more controversial because if finds the entire narrative of the case for obstruction in plain sight. Almost nothing about the case involves new information. \"This indictment could have been drafted without anyone being interviewed,\" said this source. Rather it takes well covered public events and moves them to a set of circumstantial conclusions. There is no smoking gun beyond the often flagrant, custom-breaking, events of the President's 16 months in office. Indeed, much of the evidence is based on the President's public statements and tweets about those events.\n\nThis is, according to White House sources who have gotten wind of this approach, good news: the case then, is just an issue of what motives you ascribe to the President's behavior—behavior that is, the President's supporters believe it is easy to show, impulsive and not thought out. Hence no intent. For the Mueller team, it is precisely that careless behavior and flagrant disregard for the rules that they aim to put on trial.\n\nThere is no certainty that the Special Counsel's office will ultimately pursue its plan to indict the President. But, according to a source the worry is that the plan is \"more advanced\" than previosly believed. . The investigation continues and new evidence or other factors might push both prosecutors and the grand jury in another direction. Just passing its first anniversary, the Mueller investigation has conducted itself with remarkable secrecy. Descriptions of a proposed indictment provide one of the few insights into its strategy and its sense of the political peril in front of it.\n\nIt may be noteworthy that there appears now not to be plan for an indictment related to collusion, although, legal experts say, that could come later.\n\nThe White House view is that without the underlying collusion charge, Mueller will be presenting a weak and politically-motivated case. The Mueller view seems to be that the obstruction charges go to the heart of exposing how Trump has abused his power and turned the White House into a corrupt fiefdom.\n\nThe President's scheme to obstruct the FBI's investigation into connections between the Trump campaign and Russian efforts to undermine the U.S. election, according to Mueller began on the 7th day of the Trump administration. Three days prior to this, on January 24, National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, lied to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian Ambassador, Sergey Kislyak. These were contacts, directed by an unnamed person.\n\nThat unnamed person, in the view of several lawyers who discussed the case with me, is very likely Trump himself, and might imply that Trump encouraged Flynn to lie to the FBI, promising to protect him—using his influence or pardon powers.\n\nOn January 27th, seven days after Donald Trump's inauguration, the President had the one-on-one dinner with FBI"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: my suggested type of edits. lets talk", "body": "my suggested edits"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re: my suggested type of edits. lets talk", "body": "Thanks. It's still quite challenging. Will speak shortly to Michael."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "6/13/2018 2:36:34 PM", "subject": "Re: my suggested type of edits. lets talk", "body": "he is commited to not doing it - now , if any hint of trouble ill explain on the phone I had a long talk this morning."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026260.txt_826
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026260.txt
subject:
  Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "coin issues. : receive coins, distribute coins, pay in coins, coin cooperative, prohibitions foreign donor.? i need to understand flow of funds. . donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it have to go there at all etc."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a confession privelege. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Populist/Nationalist first\nConservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next\nReverse alabama\nThis coalition staves off \"times up\" for next decade plus"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:24:39 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "understood. but need details. money needed for think tank, for ads. for policy meetings. . though leaders. we could also make the coin in some instances non negotiable for 2 years. . is there a super smart FEC person. ?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:26:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Yes...I've got the 2nd best--best is don mcgahn who is occupied currently"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030365.txt_836
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030365.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 14, 2017 4:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2017 9:32:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt_837
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:49 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026507.txt_840
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026507.txt
subject: Fwd: Trump @ War
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/24/2018 12:47:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trump @ War", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:25 PM", "subject": "Trump @ War", "body": "https://app.frame.io/presentations/a87092af-cb6a-473b-9241-582c03dbb906"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023101.txt_846
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023101.txt
subject: Re: Trump told me
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/16/2016 10:34:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump told me", "body": "Send me pic of you and trump !"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Trump told me", "body": "I was the smartest woman he had ever met he offered me a job .(€ based on who I was )\n\nNot a resume no one took me seriously but he did !!!\n\nHe would be wise to put me on his Champaign trail my Trump story would lead him to Victory\nHis intuition lead him to his success and his intuition would make this country great .."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt_855
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt
subject: Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2016 7:53:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story", "body": "I saw this on the BBC News App and thought you should see it: \nsilver linin in #Trum iTaies stor \nWhile the video of Donald Trump denigrating women has horrified \nmany, the backlash has also showed how much has changed for \nomen. Trumps PUSSY Gate"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030417.txt_859
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030417.txt
subject: RE: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:28:31 -0800", "subject": "RE: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2O11/O3/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-cou ple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine- maxwell.html > by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaircom/contributors/vicky-  ward> March 8,2011,2:30 PM \"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.\" So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true. When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. And Ghislaine? Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has been open about. So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}, {"sender": "Eva Dubin", "recipients": ["Jeffrey leevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 11:49 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "superb!!!! Where and when will this be published??"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026028.txt_860
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026028.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Afri zp", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "November 29, 2016 at 3:26:13 AM GMT-3:30", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Larry,"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Who is the guy you have set me up with?\n\nSpend zero effort on anything about me w trump. Seeing his approach to conflict of interest, his Putin proximity, and his mindless response on Castro death I'm best off a million miles away.\n\nUntil they are deeply humbled by the fuckups that are sure to come, I serve myself and country best by doing nothing that involves loyalty to them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 29, 2016, at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "ok, except I hope they can rely on you to give them guidance privately after the fact.? Karim Wade. is the son of the president of Senegal. (they just found GAS offshore ). He is well educated and one of the most important figures in west africa. however full disclosure , he was put in jail to remove him from running against the current president . He isin qatar awaiting his political return to power which is almost guaranteed. He is the most charismatic ,and rational of all the africans and has theire respect."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 12:13:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Always quiet advice to anybody who can use it. Try always discreet. If u become associated publicly w something the reputations converge. Looking fwd to meeting Karim."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030371.txt_861
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030371.txt
subject: Fwd: draft
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/21/2018 9:34:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: draft", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million, ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for restructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price, for both, lets say approx $8 - 15m . leaving loss of between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28 % obama. tax 3.8%. city and state 12% total aprox 43 %. tax rate. savings 38.7 - 44 m"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt_863
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt
subject:
  Re: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 1:58 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html", "body": "dinner with woody sun?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 2:02 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html", "body": "7?"}, {"sender": "David Blaine", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html", "body": "Perfect"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:08:36 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt_869
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017, at 10:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume you do not want to represent. Hamad bin jassim? Qatar. Hired Ashcroft. ? Silly, Anyone you would like to suggest for him?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why does he need counsel?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Navigate wash views on intl law and sanctions"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017, at 10:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We're you on tv today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun? When are you in New York this week"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All week. How do you know if you have appendicitis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017, at 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lower right side excrutiating"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017 at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Maybe Trump wants to get impeached. Going after Mueller is declaring holy war."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 1:32:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "However not firing him might be suicide"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029851.txt_875
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029851.txt
subject: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid =)", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:39:37 PM", "subject": "Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley <i>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague, Bob Costa,\nand I getting ready to post a story about President Trump’s decision to move ahead with retaining outside counsel, and\nwe understand you’re one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior White House officials. I just\nwanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if you want to comment), and I also\nwanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record, just in case there is any nuance or guidance\n\nyou’d like to provide. I’m at [EE or my desk is =\n\nThanks,\nAshley"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019322.txt_876
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019322.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Oth circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels\n\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance\nbetween right-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru\nwho was Donald Trump’s right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following\nthe racist violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the\nDaily Beast himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (Il Movimento), right in the\nheart of Europe and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view\nof the European elections which will be held in spring 2019.\n\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor\nof the Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in\nsupport of NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist\nright, accused of plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in\norder to have labour at low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current\nMinister of the Interior Matteo Salvini.\n\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in\nthe European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and\nRome — is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great “populist international” of which he\nhas long since been dreaming.\n\nThe Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of strategic\nadvice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme European\nmovements. Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and channeling\nfunding.\n\nThe aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of “super group” that if victorious can conquer up to a\nthird of the European Parliament in the elections next May.\n\nIndeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own. The\nAmerican strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US Congress\n— and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016 used data\nstolen from Facebook to try to influence the presidential election from which Donald Trump\nemerged victor. It is not a mystery that for a long time he courts nationalists of the right from East to"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029689.txt_881
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029689.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:45:53 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Tunisia: Tunisia’s transition suffered a terrible blow on February 6\" when leftist opposition alliance founder and\nhead of the Democratic Patriots party Chokri Belaid was shot dead outside his home in Tunis. The event drew\nthousands of protestors to the streets, clamoring against the leading Islamist Ennahda party. The events heighten\nthe Islamist-secular divide that has featured in the Tunisian transition and the Arab Spring at large. Tunisian Prime\nMinister Hamadi Jebali described the event as the “assassination of the Tunisian revolution” and promised to\ndissolve the Islamist-led government and form a technocrat government aimed at promoting national unity at this\ndivisive time.\n\nEgypt: The second anniversary of the Egyptian revolution on January 25\" was marked less by celebration than it\nwas by violence, culminating in a week of unrest that took the lives of more than 50 people. The week was also\nmarked by the imposition of a curfew, state of emergency, and large military deployment in the cities of Suez,\nIsmailliya, and Port Said. The events reflect the disillusionment of Egyptians, given the lack of progress on both\npolitical and economic fronts, while also revealing the state’s limitations in restoring order and the rule of law to\nthe streets. That the army—the country’s most powerful institution—warned of the “collapse of the state” is a\ntelling and serious message, conveying the institution’s growing frustration with the political impasse.\n\nThe recent violence has also generated serious economic losses and fuel shortages, and caused yet another delay\nwith the much-needed IMF loan. It will be interesting to see how the recent violence—as well as the general\nmalaise caused by economic woes—affects the Muslim Brotherhood’s performance in the upcoming\nparliamentary election (which is yet to be scheduled). A recent report issued by the Brotherhood’s political bureau\nhinted that the party’s popularity has been in decline.\n\nAgainst this backdrop of political and economic turmoil, the 12\" summit of the Organization of Islamic\nCooperation (OIC) convened in Cairo on February 5“ with a number of key players in the region in attendance—\namong them President Giil of Turkey, Emir Hamad al-Thani of Qatar, and Saudi Crown Prince Salman. The\nsummit aimed to discuss Syria, Mali, and the Palestinian issue. The spotlight, however, was on Mahmoud\nAhmadinejad: the first Iranian president to visit Egypt since the 1979 Islamic revolution.\n\nLibya: On January 31“, European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton announced the launch of a two-\nyear civil mission to help secure Libya’s 4,000-kilometer border. The announcement was complemented by a\nsurprise visit to Tripoli by David Cameron, who also announced his government’s commitment to helping the\nLibyan military and police with training and support. Furthermore, a meeting in Paris the week of February 11™\nwill bring together a number of countries to discuss security cooperation and the future of the Libyan legal system.\nThese initiatives are a telling manifestation of the urgent need to address security in Libya—especially border\nsecurity—given the Mali crisis, the recent terrorist incident in Algeria, and concerns about security and stability\nacross North Africa.\n\nJordan: The results of the Jordanian parliamentary election came as no surprise: pro-government candidates\nstrengthened their hold, though state television reported that the majority of the 150 seats had been won by\nindependents (an indicator that tribal allegiance is becoming a more important factor than party politics).\nAccording to official figures, 56 percent of the country’s 2.3 million registered voters turned out for the ballot,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt_892
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sent you his book cover, he has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. on the short list."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt_908
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt
subject: Trump; Prince of Believers .docx
messages:
  [{"sender": "aziza alahmadi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:48:34 AM", "subject": "Trump; Prince of Believers .docx", "body": "Attachments: Trump; Prince of Believers .docx; Untitled attachment 454977.htm \nImportance: High \nhttps://www.google.ca/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/20/saudi-aramco-ceo-says-to-sign-50-billion-of-deals-with-u-s-companies.html  \nhttp://www.argaam.com/en/article/articledetail/id/486123"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021411.txt_923
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021411.txt
subject: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "case, that the University would remove the allegation from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated\nthat written agreement with you.\n\nRe item 6: You report on ASU’s response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never\nany allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related specifically\nto your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was\nallegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. | was\nsurprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that\nbecause of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be\ninvestigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible\nand no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU’s investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies\nin the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, | will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a\ntemporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along with the statement made\nin the complaint that\n\n\"It is the University’s understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\n\nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim\nand apparent later claims as follows:\n\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in\n\nan unwelcome manner.\n\n- The conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took\nthe ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested\nin the course of the investigation.\"\n\n(And for the record | often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as | specifically request selfies not to include flashes,\nso that | don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\n\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that | get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come\nup to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. | am particularly proud of the way | attempt to make all\npeople feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what | am about, which is to\nacknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As | understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take\nselfies at the CFl conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, | am proud of the\ninteractions | have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. | have had numerous female graduate students,\npostdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the\ncontrary in fact, as | have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. | treat others as responsible adults,\nand | expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous Iii", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations\nagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in\ndetail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6\nbelow). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and\nfabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious\nintent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt_928
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt
subject: Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:43:53 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "sums it up well. , needs to add melania. pressure, bibi indictment. jared money grubbing. _ recipe\nfor tragedy"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019336.txt_936
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019336.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve.bannon@example.com>", "recipients": ["ben_harnwell@dignitatishumanae.com"], "timestamp": "22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": null, "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": "<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032709.txt_942
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032709.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 12:46:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also, gently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down Trump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031470.txt_948
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031470.txt
subject: Re: tomorrows news today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/05/20/trump-bill-clinton-rape_n_10062090.html"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "Yup. Going to be ugly. Who will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "difficult to bet against the card cheat , if you are gambling on the outcome. . I have some great stories , as i have just returned from a week of jeffrey style meetings a any time today"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 12:31:20 PM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "Who is the card cheat? Both have aspects. Will call"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031316.txt_950
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031316.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "steven hoftenber", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033371.txt_955
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033371.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/26/2018 7:34:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "direction of trump? criminal tax fraud??\nhttps://therealdeal.com/2018/04/26/shvo-settles-tax-evasion-case/?utm_source=The+Real+Deal+E-Lerts&utm_campaign=9f5d9ae9f9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6e806bb87a-9f5d9ae9f9-385784701"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029185.txt_963
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029185.txt
subject: Re: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 6:29:24 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to upgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 cancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the other place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am going to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could take a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\". \nAs promised you will get my message promptly. \nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget implies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily on amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before deadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum). \nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment. \nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines. \nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come. \nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Am 26.08.2018 um 22:04", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the ticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to buy out the old ticket before they cancel it. \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a discount ticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the event in UK with Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a dialogue at your place whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more money perhaps.. \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence \nyour mail meets me on the way out to a week abroad. \nI need my financial colleague to decide. So, I shall be \nback at the end of this month. \nWhat would our share be? \nBest Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 17.08.2018 um 16:37", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob \nThere has been a complication. The Gottingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I am going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I thought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket. \nLawrence."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence \nmy colleague is waiting for two sentences on your planned topic... \nCould you save him?... \nJakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Am 07.06.2018 um 17:40", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do. \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time. \nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to make clear where your talk will go for.. \nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus on ORIGINES. \nI do look forward to having you here again! \nAs ever Jakob \nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 06.06.2018 um 19:13", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of Time.. or I could speak about Science in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer? \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Michael Braun", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence Krauss, \nmy name is Michael Braun and I am working on the DAI Heidelberg's fall program brochure. \nMay I ask you if you settled on a topic for your Heidelberg talk? \nIf so, could you send me title and a short abstract for me to include in the brochure and on our website? \nBest \nMichael"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031302.txt_965
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031302.txt
subject:
  Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF
  EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 3:50:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nH\nIbeeeL vepeeneL ve pernitL verermL ererme erent epee cape eee PE EL eer eee vee ee er rere, i"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nDARREN K. INDYKE\nDARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC\n575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor\nNew York, New York 10022"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025967.txt_968
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025967.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "RE:", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at a time . put one in storage or covered, but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste - this is why I am asking!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:16:43 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "exactly"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/28/2016 4:14:35 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Are you around this Friday and weekend.\nI am - and leaving on Sunday at 5pm for Greece until August 15th/.\nIf you around would love to see you.\nJust a quick question - do you have any name for a potential LP for my fund. I am planning a final close end of September /October.\nPlease let me know"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.txt_974
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <j_wolff@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 7:00:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Well, I guess if there's anybody who can wave thus away, it's Donald. Let me know if there's anything I can do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is, and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016413.txt_976
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016413.txt
subject: Opportunity Zones
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul V Morris", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2019 4:44:33 PM", "subject": "Opportunity Zones", "body": "Hope all well, are you doing anything around these or clients?"}, {"sender": "Paul V. Morris", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Opportunity Zones", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033403.txt_980
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033403.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in dc today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trust me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course I trust you...what is going on?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 2:46:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she flew to london yesterday. back in dc. tonight dallas. then seatle. then tel aviv. totally jet lagged and cranky"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030752.txt_981
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030752.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when 1 see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite\nof food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok , anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:26:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031084.txt_990
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031084.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor, are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga. \nAre you in? \nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? I will come w bill at that time. Pis let me know."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me„ sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower! \nWorked most of fight. \nLets plan rather to meet tmr. \nLets talk tmr. \nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:45:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "perfect"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029892.txt_994
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029892.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\n\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a\nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records\nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have\n\nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know.\n\nJess"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.txt_1005
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.txt
subject: Trump shoots back at Democrats, declares 'I don't do cover-ups'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2019 5:02:24 PM", "subject": "Trump shoots back at Democrats, declares 'I don't do cover-ups'", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/05/22/i-dont-do-cover-ups-president-trump-during-rose-garden-press-conference.html  \nhttps://nypost.com/2019/05/22/trump-shoots-back-at-democrats-declares-i-dont-do-cover-ups/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20190522&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-7962477-719004712"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031090.txt_1012
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031090.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: [Pen-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "6/14/2010 8:18:52 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: [Pen-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: [Pen-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients"], "timestamp": "Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Armando Fernandez,D.D.S.", "recipients": ["Coleman Christie", "Edward Petillo", "Foley, Daniel", "JJuncal", "John Noto", "John Noto", "Joy Toboroff", "lennycorp", "Richard Savino"], "timestamp": "Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:53:54 -0400", "subject": "Fwd: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Leonard Lebovitch", "recipients": ["willie friedman", "gregg&gisele dimant", "jerry hirsh", "harwey morga edy-imi weiss peter weiss", "ROBERT SAWYER"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:49:10 -0400", "subject": "[Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:28 PM", "subject": "Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": "Rod Blagojevich is the former Illinois Governor who tried to sell Obama's seat in congress. \nObama was asked, by the press, if he had ever met Gov. Ron Blagojevich. \nBarack Obama: \"I only saw Rod Blagojevich one time ... and that was in the stands and from \na distance at a Chicago Bears Football Game.\" \nRod Blagojevich, Barack Obama and Richard Daley during a rally in Chicago , April \n16, 2007. (Photo Reuters) \nTo understand the next 4 years, you have to understand the world according to Chicago ... \nWhile Chicago is a city in Illinois , it is almost a completely different country when \nit comes to politics, with a whole different set of morals and language. \nThere are only three rules and a Prime Directive which anybody can understand. You don't \neven need an attorney to understand them --and if you need an attorney, well, you know too \nmuch...so look out for Rule #3! \nRULE #1...No matter what you see, hear, or do --you don't know anybody and you don't \nknow nothing! \nRULE #2...If you capture something on tape or camera -- it doesn't reveal nothing! \nRULE #3...If you know what everybody knows in Chicago --well, you still don't know \nnothing. \nThe PRIME DIRECTIVE in CHICAGO ...No matter what the vote Democrats win \nthe election. Now pay close attention! \nIt's very simple....we'll illustrate. Remember, you know nothing. \nThese two? They don't know each other! They said they didn't. \nThe fellas in this picture. They never actually met face to face. What fellas? We don't see \nnothing! \nThe guy on the left? For all you know he's Santa Claus. \nAnd the guy on the right.., well, he's the Easter Bunny! That's all you need to know. \nGo to your eye doctor...your eyes are lying to you! Ca'pish? \nRemember Jimmy Hoffa? He knew too much and now, well, now no one knows where \nhe is. \nIs the big picture clear? Not these pictures! Remember, You've already forgot them... \nNow, ain't that simple? They don't know each other and they never met! \nHow is that possible? 'cause they said so! And don't forget it! \nP.S. If you pass this on to your friends, don't forget, you know nothing and they will \nknow nothing.\nDavid Gibson, M.D. Chicago"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029886.txt_1015
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029886.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [mailto:JCadwell@bclclaw.com]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\n\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [mailto:jjohnson@rra-law.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of | going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [mailto:JCadwell@bclclaw.com]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [mailto:jjohnson@rra-law.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition\n\nwill follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030746.txt_1018
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030746.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": null, "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/ , ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is whoiam, this how i know jeffrey, employed from ,, to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed , firmative.. what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue.. during hte time 1 met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona .? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded. the --"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033578.txt_1030
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033578.txt
subject:
  Adam Pashut shared a link: Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump

messages:
  [{"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 4:30:33 PM", "subject": "Adam Pashut shared a link: Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump", "body": "Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump from Ran Harnevo’s Tweet"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023303.txt_1032
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023303.txt
subject: ulysses 2.0
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spin hii"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "ulysses 2.0", "body": "I realize it is only due to a lack of understanind of the job ahead. and not out of any sense of unwillingess to pay\n\n- as opposed to merely hiring people to set up a family office, someone will have to do_ the following- separate from the art partnership which is my responsiblity . there still needs to be a huge amount of work done for 2015,16. not to mention that brad at the moment is going to have train the incoming team?? your call strategic decisions re estate and other planning , sale of phaidon etc. . in addition setting up for the accounting for each strategy ie.:\n\nincome, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise picasso, 1031 calder.. review and detailed oversite of IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, entity valuations (many ) tax _filings- disclosures, follow up of  grats,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028728.txt_1045
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028728.txt
subject: prep for dinner, israel pres briefing
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/11/2013 5:45:09 PM", "subject": "prep for dinner, israel pres briefing", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt_1053
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt
subject: Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Soon Yi Previn [asoonyiprevin@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Soon Yi Previn"], "timestamp": "6/30/2017 2:23:16 AM", "subject": "Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt_1059
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt
subject: Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 7:04:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching", "body": "not sure if this applies to Leon\n\nThe reporting threshold for Schedule 2 is $200 million in total fair value of all foreign securities owned by the SHC Reporter and not held with a U.S.-resident custodian"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019108.txt_1061
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019108.txt
subject:
  JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2", "Roger Stone"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "C EO STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC/ GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\n\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029344.txt_1071
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029344.txt
subject: Post-Death Actions of Foundation Affecting Estate Tax Value
messages:
  [{"sender": "Halperin, Alan S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/2/2014 10:51:32 AM", "subject": "Post-Death Actions of Foundation Affecting Estate Tax Value", "body": "I thought of you when I read this article. Was this your idea? Alan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032672.txt_1074
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032672.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and\nsend me the day and time.\nthnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032672"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "aS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2017 10:53:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i m trying to wear the sweater but it has been gecting a bit warm here@\nhope you doing well"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023317.txt_1079
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023317.txt
subject: Fwd: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:51 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Valuation Discount", "body": "Leon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS__, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked for a re-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the outrageous incompetence in your family office... Alans words \" but I was told that.., but I was told by the office (sic) that ... , BUT i was told by joslin,. , but I was told by. \" why is leon blaming me for...\" . I ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe , had remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your office. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , youtold me last week that the emotional reason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring the benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email ,where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance dept ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and have pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off , so what if the categories are off. whats the big deal?? . I suggest you de risk you finances and make the tough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im afraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the low end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Valuation Discount", "body": "did you get the agent?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032292.txt_1085
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032292.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "give me a number ill call"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:56:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031523.txt_1086
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031523.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:13:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032882.txt_1094
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032882.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:02:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [ia asia]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033222.txt_1100
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033222.txt
subject: Fwd: February 2nd Hot Topic Briefing: Challenging Immigration Detention with Habeas Petitions
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke <darren@indykepllc.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:02:59 PM", "subject": "Fwd: February 2nd Hot Topic Briefing: Challenging Immigration Detention with Habeas Petitions", "body": "Thought you’d find it amusing that the legal education providers are already on top of Trump issues. LOL."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt_1108
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt
subject: Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [a", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2018 6:56:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Judie Taylor <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 15, 2018 at 2:36:30 PM EDT", "subject": "The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032384.txt_1109
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032384.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 7:34:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Who is the guy you have set me up with?\n\nSpend zero effort on anything about me w trump. Seeing his approach to conflict of interest, his Putin proximity, and his mindless response on Castro death I'm best off a million miles away.\n\nUntil they are deeply humbled by the fuckups that are sure to come, I serve myself and country best by doing nothing that involves loyalty to them."}, {"sender": "Afri zp", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "November 29, 2016 at 3:26:13 AM GMT-3:30", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Larry,\nI'll be very please to meet or take you for diner. My mobile in Doha is +97455125119"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 29 nov. 2016 a 00:16", "subject": "Re:", "body": "larry, karim, karim - larry, larry will be in doha on wed, 1 think you two would enjoy meeting"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032390.txt_1117
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032390.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Torn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "??"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 3:54:53 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I’m stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he’s the real deal.\ntip"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028781.txt_1119
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028781.txt
subject: FW: World Bank Nominee
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2012 7:10:58 PM", "subject": "FW: World Bank Nominee", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt_1120
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt
subject: RE: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:23:25 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use\nbonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure | follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do withit/ ? wheredo\nyou stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030587.txt_1128
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030587.txt
subject: crazy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie [kirsty.mackenzie@bbc.co.uk]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "crazy", "body": "We are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach’ of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - i or this email address.\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\n\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "crazy", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031699.txt_1130
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031699.txt
subject: FW: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky
messages:
  [{"sender": "Fred Simon", "recipients": ["Ralph Simon iii", "rcd Sino: ii"], "timestamp": "November 3, 2013 at 4:07:53 PM CST", "subject": "Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "VERY INTERESTING. G\n\nThe problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.\n\nWe Are Not Coming Back\n\nPlease take a moment to digest this provocative article by a Jewish Rabbi from Teaneck , N.J.\n\nIt is far and away the most succinct and thoughtful\n\nexplanation of how our nation is changing. The article appeared in The Israel National News, and is directed to Jewish readership. 70% of American Jews vote as Democrats. The Rabbi has some interesting comments in that regard."}, {"sender": "Brad Bowen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 04, 2013 9:42 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Terry Katka", "recipients": ["Michael S. Buchholtz"], "timestamp": "11/4/2013 4:06:12 PM", "subject": "FW: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "MB: this sums up my feelings on the direction of the country and the blind loyalty of Democratic Jews. | trust | do not offend. Its blunt but in many ways true. tk"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032896.txt_1143
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032896.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 3:05:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ponzi-schemer-steven-hoffenberg-pledges-50-million-to-help-trump/article/2593931"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033198.txt_1147
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033198.txt
subject: Doctor Behind Knock-Off "Cancer Moonshot" Meets with Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/22/2016 5:35:05 PM", "subject": "Doctor Behind Knock-Off \"Cancer Moonshot\" Meets with Trump", "body": "FYI\nhttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/602954/doctor-behind-knock-off-cancer-moonshot-meets-with-trump/?utm_campaign=internal&utm_medium=homepage&utm_source=top-stories_3&set=602951"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt_1152
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/3/2016 11:10:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hi Jeffrey long time now hear don't sweat Patterson was with trump last week small dinner he really would \nmake a good financial steward no agenda woody is busting his ass for him Rudy too wiki leaks tonight on \nHillary stopped caring fed wants to raise I guess terrible luck brexit Deutschebank then probably some terror \nthing smart to be out of it best jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.txt_1157
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.txt
subject:
  GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post

messages:
  [{"sender": "Heberlig, Brian", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid", "Silverman, Nicholas"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 17, 2018 6:47 PM", "subject": "GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-fundraiser-broidy-under-inyestigation-for-alleged-effort-to-sell-goyernment-influence-people-familiar-with-probe-say/2018/08/17/c9e55792-a185-11e8-8e87-c869fe70a721_story.html?utm term=.f7126cd4d51c  \nGOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation \nfor alleged effort to sell government \ninfluence, people familiar with probe say \nCarol D. Leonnig \nThe Justice Department is investigating whether longtime Republican fundraiser Elliott \nBroidy sought to sell his influence with the Trump administration by offering to deliver U.S. \ngovernment actions for foreign officials in exchange for tens of millions of dollars, \naccording to three people familiar with the probe. \nAs part of the investigation, prosecutors are scrutinizing a plan that Broidy allegedly \ndeveloped to try to persuade the Trump government to extradite a Chinese dissident back to \nhis home country, a move sought by Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to two of the \npeople. \nThey are also investigating claims that Broidy sought $75 million from a Malaysian business \nofficial if the Justice Department ended its investigation of a development fund run by the \nMalaysian government. The Malaysian probe has examined the role of the former prime \nminister in the embezzlement of billions of dollars from the fund. \nA Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment. Christopher Clark, an attorney \nfor Broidy, declined to comment. \nBroidy's alleged activities were detailed in news reports earlier this year that cited hacked \nemails. The Los Angeles-based venture capitalist, who served as top fundraiser for the \nRepublican Party and President Trump, has said  that allegations against him are an effort by \nhis enemies to smear him. \nRudolph W. Giuliani, an attorney for Trump, said he had no knowledge of any request for \nrecords related to Broidy. The White House referred a request for comment to the \nRepublican National Committee, which declined to comment. \n[Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy sues Qatar alleging cyber smear campaign] \nIn recent weeks, prosecutors with the Justice Department's public integrity section___which \nexamines possible political and government corruption___have sought documents related to \nBroidy's business dealings. \nAmong the information sought by investigators are details about Broidy's work on behalf of \nand interactions with the Chinese and Malaysian officials, according to two people familiar \nwith the document requests. \nAs part of their efforts, prosecutors have subpoenaed casino magnate Steve Wynn, the \nformer RNC finance chairman and longtime Trump friend, for copies of records and \ncommunications related to Broidy. \nAn attorney for Wynn, Reid Weingarten, declined to comment, saying only that Wynn is \ncooperating with the Justice Department. \n\"Steve Wynn is completely cooperating with the investigation and he certainly has no reason \nto believe that anyone acted improperly in anything he knew about or was involved in,\" \nWeingarten said in a statement. \nWynn was tapped by Trump to serve as the RNC 's lead fundraiser after the election. Earlier \nthis year, he stepped down from that post and from his executive role at his resort company \nafter reports of sexual misconduct. Wynn has denied the allegations of inappropriate \nbehavior. \nThe public integrity probe is the latest legal challenge for Broidy, who helped corral big  \ndoners to support Trump's presidential campaign, throwing a lavish fundraiser for the then-\nnominee at his Los Angeles-area home during the 2016 campaign. After the election, he was \nappointed to serve as a national deputy chairman for the RNC. \nBroidy sought to parlay his party role and connections to the White House and on Capitol \nHill in pitches to foreign governments, according to a person with direct knowledge of his \nactivities. \nIn April, he resigned from his RNC position in the wake of a report that he had paid a former \nPlayboy model $1.6 million in exchange for her silence about a sexual affair. Trump's \npersonal attorney, Michael Cohen___another RNC fundraiser___helped arrange the \nsettlement, Broidy acknowledged. \n[RNC deputy finance chair steps down after admitting Trump's lawyer negotiated settlement \nbetween him and pregnant Playboy model] \nCohen is under investigation by federal prosecutors in Manhattan who are examining \nwhether he fraudulently obtained millions of dollars in loans and whether his efforts to \nsquash negative stories about Trump during the campaign violated election law. \nBroidy's business dealings captured the attention of investigators for special counsel Robert \nS. Mueller III, who asked at least one witness about Broidy's activities, according to a \nperson familiar with the matter. \nBroidy's attempts to solve high-level headaches for the Chinese and Malaysian governments \nwere first reported this spring by the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, which \ncited in part a cache of hacked emails. \nBroidy has said the documents were stolen by enemies seeking to ruin his reputation. \n\"This whole narrative is a fabrication driven by hackers who want to undermine me,\" Broidy \nsaid in a statement to the Times. Earlier this year, he filed a lawsuit against the country of \nQatar, alleging that it hacked his email accounts in retaliation for his allegations that Qatar \nsupports terrorists. A spokesman for the Qatari government has called the suit \"without fact \nor merit. \n,1 \nThe Journal reported in March that, according to a draft contract, Broidy and his wife, Robin \nRosenzweig, were seeking $75 million from Malaysian businessman Jho Low if federal \nprosecutors dropped their investigation into a Malaysian state investment fund. \nThe Justice Department has filed civil suits claiming $4.5 billion in public money was \nmisappropriated from the fund, 1Malaysia Development Berhad, seeking to claim a portion \nof those assets. Last month, Malaysian authorities charged former prime minister Najib \nRazak with embezzling billions in public money from the fund. \nClark, the Broidy attorney, told The Journal that Rosenzweig's firm had been hired to \nprovide strategic advice to Low, adding that \"at no time did Mr. Broidy or Ms. Rosenzweig, \nor anyone acting on their behalf, discuss Mr. Low's case with President Trump, any member \nof his staff, or anyone at the U.S. Department of Justice.\" \nThe Times reported  in April that Broidy had explored ways to force Chinese exile Guo \nWengui to leave the United States. The billionaire businessman had fled China in 2014 as he \nwas facing arrest for a range of charges, including corruption. Guo has said the allegations \nwere fabricated by a government that wants to silence him. \nSince his arrival in the U.S., Guo has publicly detailed allegations of corruption in the \nChinese ruling party. \nThe Times reported that Broidy drafted a plan to enlist Emirati officials to pressure the U.S. \nto turn over Guo. In his statement to the newspaper, Broidy said he \"never had a strategy or \nplan regarding Mr. Guo nor was there any compensation given or even discussed.\" \nBroidy's alleged efforts to push for Guo's extradition came after Wynn separately helped \ndeliver a message from the Xi government seeking to have the dissident returned to China, \naccording to a person familiar with the effort. \nWynn, who has contacts with Chinese officials because of his business interests in Macau, \nhand-delivered a letter to Trump seeking Guo '5 deportation, The Journal reported  last year. \nA spokesman for Wynn Resorts has said that the report about Wynn's role was false. \nAt the time, the president expressed interest in assisting the Chinese, but was met with \nresistance by senior law enforcement officials, according to the person. \nWhite House officials did not respond to requests for comment."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2018 4:51:06 PM", "subject": "Fw: GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt_1158
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt
subject: The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "Global Asset Allocation\n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\nAsset allocation — Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market correlations to remain much lower than in recent years.\n\nEconomics — US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are responding to higher taxes.\n\nFixed Income — Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\nEquities — Japan remains our main country overweight.\n\nCredit — We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the core.\n\nCurrencies — Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the dollar.\n\nCommodities — Stay long Brent and short gasoline.\n\nUS stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds are generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains the troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt.\n\nOur overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead a number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk premia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been largely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”.\n\nIn addition, we are seeing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into a bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD activity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst offsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile for the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\nWithout a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a local impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this environment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various markets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our view of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term investors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\nLocal issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese policy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028933.txt_1166
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028933.txt
subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of \"American exceptionalism\" or \"Israeli self-defense\" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a \"transcendental purpose,\" and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn't matter because the facts are just \"abuse of history\" while real history is \"the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,\" then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I quite agree. And I'm pretty sure Lawrence does too."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 8:08:32 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Yup."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt_1176
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: <no subject>", "body": "Call me"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 17:48:01 2011", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“lve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity\nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt_1180
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?\n\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.htm!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Story [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:47:12 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031770.txt_1181
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031770.txt
subject: US special counsel's office: Trump ally Roger Stone arrested in Florida
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2019 1:11:27 PM", "subject": "US special counsel's office: Trump ally Roger Stone arrested in Florida", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/25/us-special-counsels-office-trump-ally-roger-stone-arrested-in-florida.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032279.txt_1185
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032279.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 11:04:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Woody said it doesn't mean anything."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 12, 2016, at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/295423-bill-clintons-cia-chief-joins-trump-campaign"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt_1189
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt
subject: Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records I TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/21/2016 12:01:29 PM", "subject": "Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records I TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/296818-trump-clinton-debate-expected-to-shatter-ratings-records"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt_1190
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt
subject: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kristin Andersen", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST", "subject": "Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:09 PM", "subject": "Here are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\nJay"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt_1191
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt
subject: Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg\nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\n\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\n\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\nThanks for your consideration.\nInvestigative Reporter,\n\nFoxNews.com"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt_1195
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 1:49:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just reading this...will call this morn..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt_1205
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TO ROGER STONE CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE DS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO OK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!! STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM. WIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!! STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Thanks, Regards, Darren"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Aug 16, 2016, at 10:42 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren: Best, Charles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Best, Charles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:45:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026850.txt_1209
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026850.txt
subject: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stevenhoftenberg <a>", "recipients": ["as"], "timestamp": "May 19, 2016 at 10:43:26 PM EDT", "subject": "Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)", "body": "steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)\n\n5/19/16, 10:42 PM\nCLINTON CRIMES RAPING LITTLE GIRLS TRUMP SUPER PAC GET OUR JOBS BACK INC ADS\nSHOWS CLINTON CRIMES\n\nDownload the official Twitter app here"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025904.txt_1219
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025904.txt
subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2016 at 11:07:17 PST", "subject": "Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Joi, Iam so very sorry but Jeffrey is canceling his trip to Vancouver! It is very sudden and he is sorry, but he\n\nis flying to Washington, DC now.\nI am sure he will be in touch with you...\nPlease accept our apologies..\n\nLesley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 16 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Good not bad"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2016 7:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Good. Was worried you getting deposed about Trump or something. :-)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808.txt_1224
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \"\n\n. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been\n\nmade by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me\n. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place\nand which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck\nand call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been\ncalled dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations\n\n. She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean\n\nIsland, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a21st century tale\n\nof power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to\ngain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former\n\npresident. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little\ndifferent than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her\nmother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and\nasked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless\nrecord. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are\nsupposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well.\nIn this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth ,"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous..\n\nLove the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions\nwould have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026936.txt_1228
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026936.txt
subject: Michael Cohen says he's postponing testimony over threats by Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2019 7:12:03 PM", "subject": "Michael Cohen says he's postponing testimony over threats by Trump", "body": "https://nypost.com/2019/01/23/michael-cohen-says-hes-postponing-testimony-over-threats-by-trump/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20190123&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-7579323-719004712"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031292.txt_1231
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031292.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ramsey Elkholy", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/13/2017 5:07:22 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "My sister's in a wheelchair the cancer is getting worse, she's just about done, so trying to spend some time \nwith her. My mother's alzheimer's has gotten worse, but it's not so bad, I tell her whatever I want her to know, \nlike my father is off at work and coming home soon and I have a beautiful wife and 3 kids that very much \nenjoyed her company yesterday and she's happy, so I've figured out how to manage that one. Otherwise no \nnews, going to Brazil in a few weeks. If you're still interested in Joy I'll let them know, I remember they wanted \nto meet you at Paris when they went for VS show, so not sure what their future plans are, but Marcelo - one \nof the owners/investors - will probably try to impress you Brazilian style (over-stating/inflating everything), \nbut the girls are there and they're trying to network in Eastern Europe, so if you get involved for that reason \nalone I guess you'll be satisfied at the end of the day. \nCongrats on your Trump.... but if any of that is true I guess he will be impeached (fingers crossed, lo1)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ramsey Elkholy"], "timestamp": "January 12, 2017 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "news?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032353.txt_1232
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032353.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals Po"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals Po"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "its funny, dont lose your sense of humor"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:19:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll try not to. Need to meet with you Tuesday."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt_1240
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt
subject: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:12:10 PM", "subject": "B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for\nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like\nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 - 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many\nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading\nits path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have\nseen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\n\nSincerely,\n\nLawrance Visoski\n\nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031994.txt_1241
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031994.txt
subject: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke jeevacation@gmail.com", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "1/29/2015 8:33:35 PM", "subject": "FW: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Gonzalez, Patricia", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:29 PM", "subject": "National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja--\n\nThe National ENQUIRER is preparing to publish a story that Bill Clinton used a private \"orgy\" jet to travel to \nBrunei for an extraordinary dinner with a royal accused of duping American women into \"white slavery.\" \nThe ENQUIRER will report that Bill was accompanied by the 727's owner, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, \nwhen he landed in the tiny South-East Asian country on May 25, 2002. His entourage also included two \nwomen who allegedly worked as \"madams\" for Epstein, luring teenaged girls into sex trysts with the tycoon \nand his powerful and famous friends. \n\nAccording to The ENQUIRER's investigation, Bill spent the day playing golf at a seven-star hotel -- and then was \ninvited to dine with Brunei's sultan, Hassanal Bolkiah .....who was charged with holding a deeply-religious \nChristian beauty queen as a \"human chattel.\" Far from being embarrassed by the ruler's tawdry \nreputation, moreover, records for Bill's nonprofit foundation reveal that Brunei made a donation towards his \nClinton Presidential Library that year of between $1. million and $5 million. \n\nPlease kindly attempt to provide any comment by 4 pm ET tomorrow, Friday January 30th to Lachlan \nCartwright, Executive Editor, at [Office] or \n\nThank You, \nPatricia Gonzalez \nThe National Enquirer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt_1242
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private [i"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope you are well. photos look good. fyi I receive many calls a week about both Donald ( i .\nME, beauty contest. mara lago etc) and clinton from reporters. less so recently with clinton , but my\nanswers are always i have nothing to say . ori try to ignore altogether. A few times i have been ambushed on\n\nthe street with questions . but am more careful now"}, {"sender": "Tom Barrack Private", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope ur good. Let's catch up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private [i"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 5:32:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "send photos of you and child. -- make me smile"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025125.txt_1243
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025125.txt
subject:
  Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers <lhsummers@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\n\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers <a>"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023277.txt_1245
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023277.txt
subject: jobs ahead
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechs >, Melanie Spinel: i, Ada Clapp"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "1. review accounting system. Book keeping softaware. _ staff, ( senior accountant ) methods on line banking, brokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax filings FBAR FATCA, gaming commsion, pfics, insurance . uk co law.\n\n2. review docs for TRA BRH grats, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing powers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death\n\n3 review bills . boats , planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands all outside. legal and accounting. Toms bills over 400k . house projects. south ny ben\n\n4 cashflow projections tax projections , interaction with Apollo accounting tax, Phaidon ,art space ,and Regan. legal accounting. audit\n\n5. children meetings , review to date and allocations\n\n6 review all role in payables. files scanned, no paper\n\n7 review invesmtents for tax basis and unrecognized gain\n\n8 schedule of all hedge funds . redeemables commitments etc.\n\n9 charities pledges strucutre, staff,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: jobs ahead", "body": "the list that we discussed.. i spent time with brad again. re the candidates . fiiling due, this week, next month, .\n\n2 hire an IT person asap\n\n3.I would hire jerry the woman. gittis. person\n\n4 I will find a subpart k person to handle partnership acct\n\n5 , accounting software upgrade, onlilne banking needs to be seamless\n6. not sure status of bringing plane boat acct inhouse?\n\n7 prepare fbar report for june. draft next week\n\n8 pahidon actuals vs projections. . new valuation\n\n9 . new valuation of tra contract?\n\njpm db goldman sachs acct? new Ilc?\n\nreview of dec 31 books for all entities? bfp . etc"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Melanie Spinella <"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "as areflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? ))::\nin the beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to\n\neat the apple from the knowledge tree)\n\nthat was it. ada was at the bank but reviewing docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush ( abel and cain)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt_1248
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 5:11:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Perfect. You should ping SB. He has some weird ADD thing. You remind him tho and he sometimes clicks\n\nback into plan."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he in keeping with past tradtion said he would confirm a time around 11. no word since. . the example you\nmight use, was when john mccain was grilling comey, and made some really weird statements everone\n\nlooked at each other , with a\" what is going on: \" look.\n\nit turned out to be a brain tumor.. eveyone looks\nnow with the same , WTF, look, at trump but has no idea what the future holds."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029224.txt_1249
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029224.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 12:19:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Kabuki Sec royals money"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 4, 2015", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Interesting.... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "bad press in full' swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he \nwas sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt_1252
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "we discussed what color shirt he should wear at the hearing. :)/. as you recognize there is the one major inflection point. . congress has begun the long process of trying to get answers from him. . invitation. subpoena. future contempt. wh responding. executirve privlege. . special counsel rules different but either very short or very long."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028884.txt_1255
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028884.txt
subject: Re: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift. \nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money. \nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking—Modernism) and including three episodes of tv. \nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBH), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more. \nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs. \nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250. \nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar ) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible. \nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. \nAnd I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media manager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a second stage. \nLet me know what you think? And when are we reading Whitman together. Why don't we set a date for Feb when Poetry in America 3: Whitman is running online and we could screen a little video and then have a discussion around your table with you and some friends?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:53 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 5:09:58 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Okay. Shall I attach budget? Edit the above and send it. Send it to whom?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025643.txt_1266
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025643.txt
subject: Fwd: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 5:43:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly", "body": "FYI - Alice Fisher stated to be in the mix of potential candidates for new FBI director."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt_1279
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the nuclear issue is the wrong strategy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt_1286
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt
subject: Re: Duke Buchan III
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 6:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "This guy apparently is constantly texting Trump/Trump. Have you heard of him?\nhttp://hginvestors.com/?pageid=10"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026103.txt_1287
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026103.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 12:35:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}]


