# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031074.txt_23379
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031074.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n1 why are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?\nLawrence Krauss"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:56:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024624.txt_23385
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024624.txt
subject: Re: rather long and a few typos
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "5/15/2019 10:21:20 AM", "subject": "Re: rather long and a few typos", "body": "On September 14, 1964, Dean Katherine Towle announced that existing University regulations prohibiting\nadvocacy of political causes or candidates, outside political speakers, recruitment of members, and fundraising\nby student organizations at the intersection of Bancroft and Telegraph Avenues would be \"strictly enforced.\"\n\nshouldnt you write an artile 55 years later. on campus speech today. ."}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["“For the American Male”) was published the year"], "timestamp": "Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: rather long and a few typos", "body": "REMEMBERING CAVALIER MAGAZINE\n\nLAUNCHING A MAGAZINE\n\nMy friend Michael Simmons, who has been the editor of National Lampoon and High\nTimes, observes that Cavalier hired fine scribes. A few examples: Thomas Pynchon, Philip\nRoth, William Saroyman, Isaac Asimov, Theodore Sturgeon. Cavalier was launched by Fawcett\n\nPublications in 1952.\n\nMen’s magazine Cavalier (motto: “For the American Male”) was published the year\nbefore Playboy to whom it has often been compared, and back in the day tried to be seen as\nslightly hipper, more youthful and considered a bit more clever than its big name rival. Almost\nan anti-establishment Playboy. A slogan stated: “Your dad bought Playboy, you\n\nbought Cavalier.”\nI BECAME A COLUMNIST\n\nI was invited to write a column, named “The Naked Emperor,” for Cavalier, that was beginning\nto publish underground writers and artists. They paid me $1,000 a month. My first column was\nareport on an auction of two-inch squares from the hotel bedsheets slept on by the Beatles during\n\ntheir first trip to America.\n\nThere were 300 screaming young girls, off on a fetishist’s holiday. Obviously, there wouldn’t be\n\nenough items to go around, but it was announced that the Beatles’ unwashed towels and bed"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033007.txt_23400
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033007.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert Gold"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 1:32:13 AM", "subject": null, "body": "hey, hope this finds you well. our president trump , recently told someone that i had in the past a bulldog\n\nlawyer that had sued him , that he tried to get me to stop him.\n\nseparrate from you. doesitringabell? thx"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019305.txt_23407
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019305.txt
subject: Re: Fw: Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels
messages:
  [{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re: Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels", "body": "Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels\n\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between\nright-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who\nwas Donald Trump’s right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist\nviolence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast\nhimself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (Il Movimento), right in the heart of Europe\nand its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the European\nelections which will be held in spring 2019.\n\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor of\nthe Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in support of\nNGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist right, accused of\nplots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in order to have labour at\nlow cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current Minister of the Interior Matteo\nSalvini.\n\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in the\nEuropean campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and Rome\n— is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great “populist international” of which he has long\nsince been dreaming."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/22/2018 11:58:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt_23423
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt
subject: sorry I missed your call
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Brockman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/6/2017 8:34:19 PM", "subject": "sorry I missed your call", "body": "3E,\n\n--Last week was misery.. .On Tuesday, Katinka's' younger brother, Jonathan Matson, was planning on flying \nin from Boston and having dinner with her. After several emails back and forth in the morning, he wrote \nto say he was packed and ready to leave the house but he had been fighting a stomach bug, so he had \ndecided it was best to postpone and go to bed. He was fine at 6pm when his wife (a mass General health \nprofessional) came home. She brought him a coke, went downstairs to make dinner. Half an hour later she \nwent upstairs to check on him. He had died. We got the news at 9pm on a phone call from someone we hadn't \ntalked to in 20 years\" \"Jonathan Matson has died\" was impossible to process. Katinka is still was \ndistraught and, just coming out of shock. \n\n--And...this, from my older brother Philip (\"Distinguished NASA Physcist\" awardee), who had prostate \nsurgery about 25 years, and got lucky be living in Raliegh-Durham, near Duke medical center which is \ntops. They've kept him alive and it's finally caught up to him: \n\n\"1 have run out of standard treatments. chemo is getting less effective with increasing side effects. \nThere is a new drug Keytruda it has been approved for some cancers but is still experimental for prostate \ncancer. \nhttps://prostatecancernewstoday.com/pembrolizumab-immune-therapy-help-men-prostate-cancer/. I have been \napproved to get Keytruda and will start on Thursday.\" \n\n--Finally, did I ever tell you about the Biosphere crowd? Absolutely nutty cult I represented in the \nearly 90s. (Although individually the people were sometimes fun). My friend Roy walford, the doctor \ninside the Biosphere, eventually died because of a condition he developed while inside. I kept sending \nwriters down there to work with them and they would inevitably sneak away in the dead of night. I had to \nsell their book three times, each time for a fractions of the previous advance which started in 7 \nfigures. Turns out Bannon took over as CEO of the place in 1993 so we may have overlapped. See: \nSteve Bannon Was Once Hired to manage an Artificial World of People Living Under Glass (Before the Trump \ncampaign)-\nhttp://slate.me/2kesDun \n\nIn the office this afternoon and after 10:30am tomorrow."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031480.txt_23431
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031480.txt
subject: RE: FW: Audio recording
messages:
  [{"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Marin", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Wall St Journal:\n\nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/lawyers-for-imam-wanted-by-turkish-authorities-fear-for-their-clients-life-1470418445\n\nLawyers for Imam Wanted by Turkish\nAuthorities Fear for Their Client’s Life\n\nFethullah Gulen has been accused by Turkish President Erdogan of\n\nordering the launch of July coup\n\nDEVLIN BARRETT\nAug. 5, 2016 1:34 p.m. ET\n\nLawyers for the imam living in Pennsylvania whom Turkish authorities accuse of directing a coup last month in\n\nthat country said Friday they fear for his life and may ask U.S. authorities to help protect him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 3:19 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Audio recording", "body": "funny can you speak"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/5/2016 7:39:39 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Audio recording", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032921.txt_23441
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032921.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "any new york plans"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , i can organize. anytime with wife your call. otherwise new york dec. 6-9? \ninteresting times. http ://www. dailymail. co .uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-us e-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-p arty-age-13 -FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election cruise. Bad timing on our part.\nWe'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there.\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\nHope you're well. Best, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famille as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in the Sunshine State?\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 5:32:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll be there wed"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032935.txt_23448
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032935.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 10:29:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "will let you know tomorw morning"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Trump is still scheduled to depart Sunday between 4 and 6pm\nLet me know if we are firm for wheels up Saturday at 6pm still?\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019339.txt_23452
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019339.txt
subject: Re: Fw: 9th circle
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels\n\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance\nbetween right-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru\nwho was Donald Trump’s right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following\nthe racist violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the\nDaily Beast himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (Il Movimento), right in\nthe heart of Europe and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in\nview of the European elections which will be held in spring 2019.\n\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor\nof the Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in\nsupport of NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist\nright, accused of plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in\norder to have labour at low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current\nMinister of the Interior Matteo Salvini.\n\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in\nthe European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London\nand Rome — is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great “populist international” of\nwhich he has long since been dreaming.\n\nThe Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of\nstrategic advice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme\nEuropean movements. Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and\nchanneling funding.\n\nThe aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of “super group” that if victorious can conquer up to a\nthird of the European Parliament in the elections next May.\n\nIndeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own.\n\nThe American strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US\nCongress — and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Harwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031494.txt_23457
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031494.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any thoughts on the guy?\n\nMeanwhile, I hope all is going well for you now and I wish you a happy and healthy new year.\n\nDavid Schoen"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 22, 2010 5:09 pm", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the strange person is"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As terrible as the system is and has been to you, I have to tell you one encouraging thing. Last Friday I spoke on a panel in DC on the justice system. I was seated next to Justice Breyer and got to know him a bit. For what it is worth, he certainly seem to understand that the system is broken and I hear this more and more. Indeed, he made it very clear that he thinks the sentencing system (which he helped form as a member of the Sentencing Commission) is broken and while you are past having to deal with that, I would like to think this raises some hope that the rest of the system will improve if others in his position feel the same.\n\nTomorrow I go to Alabama to argue before the court of appeals regarding the constitutionality of Alabama's Community Notification Act, which the lower court struck down as unconstitutional already. Ultra right wing court and election year, so who knows; but these laws are so Draconian.\n\nI saw that the U.S. Attorney's office is appearing in your civil cases as well. Some strange folks in that office. Anyway, I will look forward to talking and while all the judges are going to be tough, Judges Marra and Johnson so far have not been rubber stamps for government in my case and that means something.\n\nDavid"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt_23459
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt
subject: RE: Oscar diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephanie [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/4/2011 11:15:40 PM", "subject": "RE: Oscar diary", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nPeggy's story is attached to the e-mail. I have included the story in the body of the e-mail as well.\n\nThanks,\nStephanie"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Stephanie"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 6:12 PM", "subject": "Oscar diary", "body": "Send to jeffrey"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt_23468
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt
subject: Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide | Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/10/2019 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide | Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article226168500.html\n\nTop aide of Jeffrey Epstein\nprosecutor Acosta: We acted with\nintegrity\n\nFebruary 15, 2019 12:17 PM\n\nPalm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually abusing\ndozens of underage girls according to police and prosecutors. His victims have never\nhad a voice, until now. By Emily Michot | Julie K. Brown\n\nA former top prosecutor involved in the Jeffrey Epstein sex case is defending his old\nboss, Alexander Acosta, whose decision to craft a secret plea deal with the wealthy\nNew York hedge fund manager has come under federal scrutiny.\n\nIn his first public comments on the 10-year-old case, Jeffrey H. Sloman — who at\nthe time was second in command under Acosta at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033395.txt_23474
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033395.txt
subject: Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios", "body": "What do we think of this?\nhttps://www.axios.com/recession-threat-2019-regulatory-risk-google-facebook-amazon-b8966b22-57dc-426c-9f4f-5526982383c7.html"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 3:41:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios", "body": "easy and beneficial for you. . I will try to negotiate am automkoatic reset if.. such and such and so and so."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt_23480
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "10/11/2016 3:50:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/high-profile-casey-anthony-attorney-now-representing-jane-doe-in-trump-rape-lawsuit/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt_23482
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt
subject: Re: Duke Buchan III
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon [i"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 6:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "This guy apparently is constantly texting Trump/Trump. Have you heard of him?\n\nhttp://hginvestors.com/?page_id=10\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ jr thomas/index."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030761.txt_23486
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030761.txt
subject: Re: Question
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone [as"], "timestamp": "11/19/2016 5:09:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Question", "body": "its fine. will be fun"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Question", "body": "I'm not sure it's safe long term or a good option to live in the US for a Trump/Pence presidency with Bannon as\na key advisor.\n\nAm I wrong? The hate, anti-semitism (swastikas painted all over the park a few blocks from me), and \"His\"\n\ndesire to be Putin.... All super concerning.\nXX\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt_23489
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/24/2012 4:58:47 PM", "subject": null, "body": "have one of your cronys ask to see the mortgage to mara lago\n\ncash from electricinas union,, (his driver MAtt\n\nwas the bag man, later made an exec at the public co. ) and the 30 milllion dollar loan from the casino to donald\n\ntrump. backdated,\n\nDo ee ee ee ee ee i ee ee a"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032706.txt_23490
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032706.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Now being reported that Trump's lawyers sent a letter to MW's publisher demanding that they not publish the book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt_23494
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "happy chanukah. . - has anyone in the past made a linguistic model that used fields instead of\ndefinitions. similar toa magnet field. to some degree. there is no one vector that describes the word but\na field of them. home surrounded by a field of definitions. not based on 3 d space but based on context\none could integrate over the field. see smoothness. strength , change.. not sure itis useful. but\nhaving fun"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "For word meanings, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in\nCarnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't\nsee how to work it out, or to extend it to the interpretations of longer units."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "one of donalds closet people said that remember , he has written three books. . which makes him one of the\nfew people in the world that has written more books than he has read"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/26/2016 6:56:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I read what his ghost-writer said about him. Pretty scary.\n\nReminds me of something I was told by Jon Snow, one of England's most sensible newsmen. He was with the\npress entourage accompanying Tony Blair on his visit to Saudi Arabia, and walking around one of the palaces\none day, he saw Blair sitting in a room with a book in his lap, which greatly surprised him -- until he came over\nto talk. It was the New Testament.\n\nAnd then Blair started telling about how delighted he and Cheri were with the gold door handles,....\n\nI notice that your prediction was right about Trump's avoiding the White House as far too primitive. Must be\ndriving the Secret Service up the wall.\n\nI'll keep in mind what you say about Trump's tweets, but they are hard to ignore. Whatever he may think,\nothers here and abroad can't help considering the meaning of the words, and take action accordingly.\n\nAbout meaning, It's not clear to me how to distinguish the meaning of \"New York\" (however it is correctly\nspecified) from the concept. Still don't see how to work out field models.\n\nNoam"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033418.txt_23495
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033418.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/20/2018 6:36:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Think no response for a while probably appropriate. \nJust had lunch w \nIs trump getting crazier as many of my pals think or is it steady crazy."}, {"sender": "Keyu Jin", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2018 at 12:46:35 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Did RA come back with answers to the yellow highlighted? did you take a look at the section that was written \nup? apart from your revision of intro there was the first section."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt_23496
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he in keeping with past tradtion said he would confirm a time around 11 . no word since. . the example you \nmight use, was when john mccain was grilling comey, and made some really weird statements everone \nlooked at each other, with a \" what is going on: \" look, it turned out to be a brain tumor. . eveyone looks \nnow with the same , WTF , look, at trump but has no idea what the future holds."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 5:11:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Perfect. You should ping SB. He has some weird ADD thing. You remind him tho and he sometimes clicks \nback into plan."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt_23500
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!ft a"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist” platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!ft a"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we discussed what color shirt he should wear at the hearing. :)/. as you recognize there is the one major inflection point. . congress has begun the long process of trying to get answers from him. . invitation. subpoena. future contempt. wh responding . executirve privlege. . special counsel rules different but either very short or very long."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031325.txt_23510
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031325.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/25/2019 7:25:08 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033342.txt_23511
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033342.txt
subject: PBI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2019 9:53:52 PM", "subject": "PBI", "body": "spoke to TSA at Palm Bch Atlantic, \nOnce the President departs Palm Beach area, the TFR (temporary flight restriction) is lifted, \nwe should be able to land in RBI., \ncurrently the TFR expires at 10:30pm„ the superbowl is typically 3 hours long, it starts at 6:30pm„ \nOnly a guess, Trump will leave around 10pm is my guess."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt_23513
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 9:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:40:36 -0800", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who\nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory\nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033424.txt_23519
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033424.txt
subject: G550
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/18/2018 3:21:16 AM", "subject": "G550", "body": "Pete informs the new spoilers board install going well, should be return to service late wed evening, or Noon Thursday at the latest.,they are painting the white underside this evening, Blue upper surface tomorrow and clear coat wed morn.\n\nPresident Trump arrives Friday at 4:30pm ish.\n\nShould Dave and Darren move the G550 to Boca Thursday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt_23521
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents________________ who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All. With gods help;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Boies, Voila.", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2o17/n/o7/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html. Unclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:49:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "MONEY!!!! he lost the fee for hank greenburg, and needed money for his firm. if you look into boies and AIG you will find the answer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031443.txt_23528
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031443.txt
subject: High Profile
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "congratulate you on your wonderful financial successes since your days as\nmy Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good! !\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press\nprovides you with much benefit. Perhaps I am wrong? Not the first time! !\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging\ncertainly ain’t for sissys.\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in\nAmagansett in November."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "thanks,  what is david doing?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "High Profile", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026491.txt_23535
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026491.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"Grossman, Andrew M\" <andrew.grossman@example.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree"}, {"sender": "\"Rivkin, David\" <david.rivkin@example.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon <steve.bannon@example.com>"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve.bannon@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 23, 2018, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "ihtink weak thoughts?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathy.ruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 5:25:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "exactly my view. on facebook I thought you might look at the recent internet and privacy opinions and pose some open questions. to be discussed . mark wants to bring the internet to the rest of the world.. and healthcare. . his wife is nice but boring.. what do you see as the challegnes what does she or he see.\n\nsocial"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031457.txt_23538
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031457.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 8 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK\nbecause after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for\nme either way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Pass on midelfart wealthiest girl in Norway"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 11:08:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Maybe I will wait for the pics in your kitchen:)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016480.txt_23541
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016480.txt
subject: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maksim Nemtsev <menemtsev@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Browning, Jack <JackBrowning@dwt.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 10:33 AM", "subject": "Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Hi Jack,\n\nAttached is a draft Stipulation to adjourn the return date to January 7, 2019. Answering papers will be due January 4 and reply papers will be due January 6.\n\nWe are also enlisting the assistance of local counsel to sponsor Marty's pro hac vice petition. We will provide you with copies of the motion papers once they are prepared.\n\nLet me know if you have any questions. Happy Holidays.\n\nThank you,\n\nMax Nemtsev"}, {"sender": "Browning, Jack <JackBrowning@dwt.com>", "recipients": ["Maksim Nemtsev <menemtsev@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 12:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Maksim,\n\nPlease find attached a copy of the stipulation with some minor edits, which you can go ahead and file/serve. If you do ultimately file an opposition, please serve us with copies via email.\n\nBest regards and happy holidays,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg <owlmgw@att.net>", "recipients": ["Browning, Jack <JackBrowning@dwt.com>", "Maksim Nemtsev <menemtsev@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 27, 2018 8:55 AM", "subject": "RE: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Jack, my local counsel in NY (we are filing for pro hac vice) has advised that the Court Clerk may require a signature on the Stipulaion. Out of an abundance of caution, can you sign and return and we will file today. Thanks, Marty"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt_23544
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt
subject: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jack Goldberger", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:16:00 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Trump has been moved to Sept. 24."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please let me know when u do."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033430.txt_23545
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033430.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:51:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in dc today or tomorrow?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt_23546
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt
subject: draft
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla", "Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "10/26/2015 6:08:48 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million, ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for \nrestructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price, for both, lets say approx $8 - 15m . leaving loss \nof between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28 % obama. tax 3.8%. city and state \n12% total aprox 43 %. tax rate. savings 38.7 - 44 m"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033356.txt_23548
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033356.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2019 9:28:17 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/opinion/trump-taxes.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt_23552
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late \nPresident himself As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a \njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of \npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas \nshould themselves feel ashamed. \nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the \nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are \nslanderous. \nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little \nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government \nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the \nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete \nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the \nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in \nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\" \nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would mean he - or his \nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go \nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party \nfor only two months... so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially \neverything to lose in the June vote. \nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy \nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover \nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal \nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the \nmemory of those who died. \nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to come in the coming presidential campaign - \nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the \npresidency. \nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obama is not \nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course, \nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous. \nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abiltiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on \nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago \nas well, and commented on with deep sorrow and respect by U.S. politicians from Mayor Daley to President \nObama himself"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt_23553
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\n\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\n\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:32:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032480.txt_23555
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032480.txt
subject: Fwd: RE: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 5:54:14 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: TR: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 12:15 PM", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\n\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will\nuse mostly wires.\n\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-\nends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\n\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in\nmultiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\n\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\n\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have\nsomeone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be\nneed for some work on my side before final filing is done.\n\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers\n(like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\n\nPlease do let me know.\n\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt_23556
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when \nI get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but \nit seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfasters. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention \nto, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual \nwill find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering \nother people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same \ngroup, slower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go ogle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/  \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks  \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or \nhand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of \nPython code. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They \ncurrently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object \nfeatures, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is \nmissing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor \nsimulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They \ntry to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Am 23.07.2016 um 04:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for )04 I thought? \nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male. \nVariation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain \nsize difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think \ngender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . \nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the \norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used \nas signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridination of indiv brains. = \nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are \nall math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not \nemotinal for me. \nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent \nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 10:02:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "no worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \n\nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly \na good thing for the species \n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033577.txt_23583
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033577.txt
subject:
  PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early

messages:
  [{"sender": "Anil Ambar i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:01:20 AM", "subject": "PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nInfo.\n\nBR,\nAnil"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023318.txt_23590
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023318.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "aaa Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "grats 3,4,5,6, also need accounting documents and backup. year 2014. other info request to follow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "A couple of questions:\n1. Jeffrey-you saw the format in which we organized the back-up for year one of grat 1 (quite thick/alot of back-up).\n\nDoes that format work (for you and internal use) or do you want it simplified/modified. Let's discuss.\n\n2. Since this will take the focus and effort of a lot of people (just to pull and organize the various records...both\nlegal and accting, I'd like to tell the staff that we are answering an \"information request\" from the irs on the\ngrats. It will generally be helpful for them to know why the work is impt.\n\nYou and leon ok with this?\n\nWill call you to discuss."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in\nyour collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. J understand your desire to\nmodifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show\nyou, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I\nvigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work.. you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a\nreaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint\nover it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me\n,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea\n. Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I\nguess you wanted to save money. ?\nThe audit has brought to the fore the lack of your office quality that i have been violently squawking about. ie\n. children playing with works of art. . It is inconceivable to me that John castrucci is still there , joslin part\ntime, but relied on . joe error prone and brad a corporate bandleader talking about the office's finance team,\naccounting dept, and directing wendy to do things that are clearly not in your interest. ( saving money again\n?) its nuts!!.a still non-existent IT dept. impossible , it was the first thing on my list of things that were\nneeded to be done. Still no trading accounts to speak of , though its prophylactic quality has been discussed\nover and over during the past three years . computers do not read Page Six. the women atthe IRS do.! you\nsaid your motivation in keeping this group of part timers was a consequence of the high cost of my\nartwork. . the unfortunate result was easily predictable. - now\n\nIf you want my and my atelier to continue, I will oversee the audits. take charge of the TRA BRH\n\nassignments and review 2012 amendment options!!( note :your redo of the estate fire drill has not progressed\nvery far ). Lots of paper needs to be collected and reviewed, At MY direction. the outside team will be brought\nin at my expense working for me and you. coming in for interviews and reviews, . sucession, technology, tax\nand compliance. investment reporting , , computerized timelines for filings etc. . household\nclassifcations and reporting with a system of best practices.\n\nMy goal is clear - to end, not extend , our financial interactions. you will have a machine that works , it\nwill not be complexto oversee , to create it, is some thing else . Unfortunatley for us both, the price for my\nworks has not changed since day one. 40m per year, I m willing to discount it to 35 as I did give you a bad\nnumber when asked and should pay an embarassment fine. Im also aware, as you made perfectly clear . that\nyou have already paid what you consider a great deal of money, for my work , but again its value exceeds"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031964.txt_23591
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031964.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 31, 2013, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Time to write the wait \"until too late \"op Ed ???"}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it might be launched before the op ed will be accepted by any major paper"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 31, 2013, at 21:06", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it will be at a minmumm a week or two not before g20"}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "After listening to POTUS speech, You're probably right. EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "8/31/2013 7:21:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I would use the opportunity to compare it with iran. the solutions become more compelx with time not less. i \nthink many people would like your views on egypt. syria, etc. russias role.? i think you might point out the \ngassing of\" women and children\" is an expressions from the 20th centry. women are no longer equiv to \nchildren, . civilians. vs combatants . only."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.txt_23592
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.txt
subject: Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (05)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Susan Moss", "recipients": ["Thomas E. Scott", "Steven R. Safra", "Simpson, Richard", "Borja, Mary", "Eiler, Ashley", "Jack Scarola", "Mary E. Pirrotta", "smccawley@bsfllp.com"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:22:42 AM", "subject": "Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (05)", "body": "Good morning,\n\nI am advising of Judge Lynch's rulings on the above referenced case. His rulings are\nas follows:\n\nNon Party's motion to quash, or for protective order, regarding subpoena served on\nnon party law firm Boies Schiller: | The subpoena, as to the law firm, is quashed\n\nAs to the \"Jane Doe #3\" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9, 17,\n18, 20 and 23.\n\nThe motion is denied as to the other requests, but a confidentiality order shall be\nentered.\n\nRegarding the deposition: The depo shall be limited to 4 hours without prejudice to\nrequest additional time in the future.\n\nThe Defendant can be present at the depo.\nThe depo will be taken at the law firm representing the witness.\n\nThere shall be a special master, paid by the Defendant, present at the depo, to rule\non objections.\n\nThe depo will be limited to the issues of this case without prejudice for another\ndepo, if required, in the future.\n\nThe issues and said limitations will be determined by the special master.\n\nEach attorney who had a motion heard, is to prepare the order on their motion for\nthe judges signature, along with sufficient copies, self addressed, self stamped\nenvelopes for all parties.\n\nThese orders cannot be submitted through the order portal.\n\nRespectfully,\n\nSusan Moss\n\nJudicial Assistant to Judge Thomas M. Lynch, IV"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033563.txt_23593
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033563.txt
subject: Fwd: RE: Barrack is not
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/9/2018 7:48:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: Barrack is not", "body": "For ur info\n\nhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalcovers/2018/07/09/disastrous-deal-staggers-trump-ally-thomas-barrack/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031504.txt_23596
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031504.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to?\nI would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London.\nAny thoughts?\nPS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed. and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market, more like custodian than investor."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:55:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up in lock ups."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt_23598
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 8:23:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019107.txt_23600
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019107.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 166 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026225.txt_23603
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026225.txt
subject: Re: Plane management
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do withit/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure | follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033205.txt_23607
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033205.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2016 8:51:06 PM", "subject": null, "body": "President-elect Donald J. Trump kicked around ideas for his inauguration in his office at Trump Tower on Tuesday with two of his oldest friends, Mark Burnett and Thomas Barrack Jr."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt_23613
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Oct 25, 2015, at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence. . the cinese are willing to build a new\ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech. if he were to call it the obama xi\ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 1:02:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good idea. It didn’t seem like Obama was that interested in hard sciences though... What’s your read?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt_23618
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Siad"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you call me \nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza with 8 top girls he said he would like to \nbuild some thing with you \ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this meeting even Jean Luc could doo a \ngreat biz also \nIhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any deals with anybody before he meet \nwith you. \nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me know what is your plans \nwarmest regards \nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the other girl name is Anastasia kuznetsova"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Siad"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 24 2010 04:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will be in paris tom000rw night"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031682.txt_23627
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031682.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y. as"], "timestamp": "4/20/2019 10:09:26 PM", "subject": null, "body": "On the American side, a varied cast of characters was fielding overtures and proposals from Russians or pro-Russian Ukrainians during the campaign and transition, including: Mr. Gerson; George Nader, the Lebanese-American with Trump campaign connections; Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman; Michael D. Cohen, the president’s longtime fixer and lawyer; and Erik Prince, the Blackwater founder and brother of Betsy DeVos, Mr. Trump’s pick for education secretary."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023330.txt_23632
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023330.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinell"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "tax planing running out of time. .7 restructure office. barry? brad told me he thought you had acknowledged high value this year. gift tax audit etc., . April, Oct. . returns. manage joslin , who is still running your tax dept .\n\nyou and I need not rehash old postures, its tedious - I would ask that you tell me if you intend to pay for the work that was done, and for the work you expect to be done, . thanks"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but Im encouraged and glad for you. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before him. what would you like me to tell Barry?\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work that i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it again if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning there was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was chosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes i personally augmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax, | He complained for over a year , re his direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was not a surprise after months and moths of warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with john and joe. He ran amok, and as i told you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you told him that he works for you and not for me and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that 1 gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up questions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _) but somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the task, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by trying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his work. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and continued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes , was also my doing , though email after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your response was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan you told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the foreign funds repatriation plan that 1 had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions to make re my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit much time and make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced mess.\n\nThat being said, the tasks at hand are the following.\n\nYou have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??!. Iam concermed re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are alla part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. Joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced with new. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030626.txt_23643
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030626.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Ken Starr", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Martin Weinberg", "Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "12/21/2018 9:22:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg <martinweinberg@...>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren Indyke AO <...>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:06 PM", "subject": "FW: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Browning, Jack [jack.browning@dwt.com]", "recipients": ["Marty"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 21, 2018 3:37 PM", "subject": "Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Please find attached of the motion papers we just filed to unseal the redacted briefs in the 2011 appeal we discussed yesterday. As per my client's instructions, we have set the return date on the motion as December 31. If Mr. Epstein has no opposition to the motion, however, no opposition or response is necessary.\n\nBest regards and happy holidays,\n\nJack"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033197.txt_23644
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033197.txt
subject: Markets and DJT
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/22/2016 1:49:24 PM", "subject": "Markets and DJT", "body": "Donald has got to love this -- NYT calling him next Reagan:) You called it... \nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/ ii/ 2i/business/ de alb o ok/investors-make-bullish-b et-on-trump-and-\nan-era-of-tax-cuts-and-\nspending.html?hpw&rref=business&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-\nregion&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well& r=o"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt_23646
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:49:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032899.txt_23653
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032899.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson"], "timestamp": "11/6/2016 8:32:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump/ and having agreat deal of fun. in hindsight. you were right about staying away from andrew. I was right in your staying with rinaldo"}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What’s the donald white house ? And how are you ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 19:42", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in the donald white house"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 19:15", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "63 years old. . you made it"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026650.txt_23658
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026650.txt
subject: Private equity has direct line to new administration
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/19/2017 11:12:21 PM", "subject": "Private equity has direct line to new administration", "body": "Private equity has direct line to new administration\n\nJan. 19, 2017 12:05 PM ET|By: Stephen Alpher, SA News Editor\n\nThere's not just Wilbur Ross who will serve as Commerce Secretary, but also Blackstone (NYSE:BX) CEO\nSteve Schwarzman who will chair the President’s Strategic and Policy Forum, and attorney Jay Clayton - who\nhas advised on numerous major P-E deals - to lead the SEC.\n\nAside from those official posts, the president-elect has met with the heads of Carlyle Group (NASDAQ:CG)\nand KKR since his election.\n\n\"There seems to be more interest in the advice of real-world practitioners than in the past,” says the head of the\nP-E industry's D.C. lobbying group. \"This is encouraging.”\n\nIndeed. Among P-E's top priorities is carried interest - one of the few things Trump and Clinton agreed on\nduring the campaign. Carried interest is currently taxed at 23.8% vs. the top ordinary income tax rate of 39.6%.\nLike Clinton, Trump wanted carried interest taxed as ordinary income, though Trump would lower the top rate\nto 33%. Other tax law changes Trump is proposing could cut the effective tax rate further - perhaps to as low as\n25%, or just marginally higher than currently.\n\nAnother big priority is retaining the tax deductibility of interest. Trump wants to give companies the ability to\neither keep that deduction or pass and gain the ability to immediately expense capital investment. A plan by\nHouse Republicans might not be as favorable.\n\nOther players: OAK, APO, FIG, ARES"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033239.txt_23660
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033239.txt
subject: Per your point about Trump/Aramco/Ponzi
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 12:51:12 PM", "subject": "Per your point about Trump/Aramco/Ponzi", "body": "https://www.fairobserver.com/region/middle_east_north_africa/donald-trump-saudi-arabia-oil-aramco-news-60922/?utm campaign=Daily%2o0Fringe%20&utm source=hs email&utm medium=email&utm content=52487236& hsenc=p2ANqtz--UTwt81DzZpk6zyw34g9GdPZPoZwsqwM128tJRlurvCO743YcshoDCCjkHnAUT_ aPi33tdrUG6_Paht5ufCkN48qfxw& hsmi=52487236"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031696.txt_23668
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031696.txt
subject: Fwd: "Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin"
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff PD", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/16/2011 8:08:35 PM", "subject": "Fwd: \"Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin\"", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2011 3:59:12 PM EDT", "subject": "\"Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin\"", "body": "Dear Friend,\n\nMary Matalin and Hilary Rosen debate torture, Afghan, and Obama after Osama. How is the Barack & Hillary\n\"Team of Rivals\" performing on foreign policy? And the women clash on Gingrich and Gibson (Mel).\n\nHere, fyi, is today's HuffingtonPost feature and audio:\nhttp://www.huffinetonpost.com/huff-radio/both-sides-now-w-huffinet 16 b 862240.html\n\nBest,\nMark"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt_23675
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I got it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Please call me\n\nMy number is blocked and it does not go through when I am calling you\nB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt_23677
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "ron as", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:48:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hey Jeffrey! !\nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not?\n\nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling\nto NY often to see him and can catch up with you..\n\nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-)\n\nHugs,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032504.txt_23678
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032504.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is It possible for you to pass by Strasbourg, it would be great. I really need to understand more about Trump \nand what's going on in the American society."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 17, 2017 21:27", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im in paris until thurs? you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 11:14", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, that should be possible. remind me how long is the fast train? otherwise ill fly. what days are good \nfor you"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 9:11:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Train, 1h45, I'll pick you up at the train station. Tuesday afternoon is ok. Also Wednesday, but only after 6 \nson."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032406.txt_23691
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032406.txt
subject: Re: From a physicist friend
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:53 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "Awareness is you\n\nChair and Body / Mind and The Universe are re created in consciousness with every experience in you / being\nExperience is in time\n\nYou are not in time\n\nThis mornings post\n\nHas so far reached 300,000 people in less than 1 hour\n\nSome people are getting it !!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "im glad. I think the encyclpedia of meditation is going to be great __ we still have to work on the app and the\nboardgame. . instead of jail maybe it is spending time with Trump."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, January 2, 2017 10:58:07 AM", "subject": "Re: From a physicist friend", "body": "I'm with you Sir !\nHoping to see you soon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030801.txt_23692
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030801.txt
subject: Re: guess who
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2018, 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: guess who", "body": "by late fall he had sold most his clothes including his black winter overcoat, and so the snow and cold drove him to further humiliation. Huddled in a light jacket late one afternoon just before Xmas he trudged all the way to Meidling in the outskirts of town. It took two and a half to reach his destination the ASy Fur abdachlose a shelter fore the destitute , and by the time he arrived he was exhausted. his feet sore Run by a philanthropic society whose principal support was the Epstein family,"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: guess who", "body": "Hitler\nThat's the men's dorm he lived in during those 3 dark years as failed artist"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/30/2018 8:01:43 PM", "subject": "Re: guess who", "body": "Not only billionaire pedophile friend of trump but helped hitler just what i need"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033168.txt_23696
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033168.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 3:18:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "trump is on the move..\nhttp://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/\nplease get your rest today as debate begins 3am for you.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028771.txt_23705
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028771.txt
subject: AW: AW: NY plane
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Robert Frost", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell\nyour friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI’m getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let’s get together on Friday night.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nKevin"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\n\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much\nenjoy the Gala.\n\nI’ve also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey’s information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance.\n\nAll the best,\n\nLena"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt_23707
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 11:00:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes around 22nd."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When marrahesh ? Is it definite"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties\nand meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with\nthe Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you\nin Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt_23725
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm so sorry this happened to you. It's terrible. And sad."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016636.txt_23726
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016636.txt
subject: Information Regarding Water Supply
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sarah E. Hannah, Assistant Town Manager", "recipients": ["David A. Rosow, Chair", "Denis P. Coleman, Member", "Peter B. Elwell, Town Manager"], "timestamp": "January 23, 2009", "subject": "Information Regarding Water Supply", "body": "The following documents are attached for your review in preparation for the Water Committee meeting on January 29 at 3 p.m.:\n1. Agenda\n2. PowerPoint presentation from the City of West Palm Beach regarding the four options for the Town’s water supply and relationship with the City.\n3. Cost estimates and other information regarding private wells.\n4. Follow-up on prior water committee information requests:\na. Information from the City regarding per capita usage in Palm Beach.\nb. Information from the City regarding a comparison of the City’s water quality with New York City’s water quality\nc. Statistical analysis of the top 100 water consumers on the island.\nd. Average daily effluent flow for the cities that use the East Central Regional Water Reclamation Facility (ECRWR).\ne. Executive summary of the results from the Town’s testing of the City’s potable water (the rest of the report is available in the Town Manager’s Office)."}, {"sender": "Eduardo Balbis <EBalbis@wpb.org>", "recipients": ["Sarah E. Hannah <SHannah@TownofPalmBeach.com>"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 01:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Sarah,\nWe have obtained information about the water supply in NYC as requested. Note that the City of NY produces about 33 times the amount of water than the City of West Palm Beach. We tried to compile data that can be comparable. However, NYC act as their own State agency and track different parameters than the State of Florida. See below for additional information."}, {"sender": "David Hanks", "recipients": ["Eduardo Balbis/WESTPALM@WESTPALM"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 10:33 AM", "subject": "WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Please let know if you want any changes made. NCY produces 1.1 billion mgd per day.\nBelow is what they say about their treatment process:\nWater Treatment\nAll surface water and groundwater entering New York City’s distribution system is treated with chlorine, fluoride, food grade phosphoric acid and, in some cases, sodium hydroxide. New York City uses chlorine to meet the New York State Sanitary Code and federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) disinfection requirements. Fluoride, at a concentration of one part per million, is added to help prevent tooth decay and has been added since 1966 in accordance with the New York City Health Code. Phosphoric acid is added to create a protective film on pipes that reduces the release of metals such as lead from household plumbing. Sodium hydroxide is added to Catskill/Delaware water to raise the pH and reduce corrosivity."}, {"sender": "Jim Bowser", "recipients": ["Patricia Gayle-Gordon"], "timestamp": "01/22/2009 01:54 PM", "subject": "Water Committee Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Pat, I believe one of the questions asked was what was the sewage flows to West Palm Beach. Here is an email to Peter sent on 1/9/09."}, {"sender": "Jim Bowser", "recipients": ["Peter B Elwell/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "01/09/2009 10:36 AM", "subject": "Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Peter, as requested, attached is sewage flow data from our Lake Worth Billings and ECRWRF monthly report. I am seeking the peak daily flows, but that is going to take additional time.\nBase upon the monthly flows, here is the average daily flow for each entity in Fiscal Year 2008 expressed as million gallons a day:\nMonth WPB LW\nOct 2.70 0.654\nNov 2.39 0.593\nDec 2.23 0.627\nJan 2.33 0.668\nFeb 2.36 0.691\nMar 2.23 0.672\nApr 2.12 0.561\nMay 2.02 0.408\nJun 2.09 0.389\nJul 2.22 0.552\nAug 2.33 0.537\nSep 2.54 0.563\nYearly Ave 2.30 0.563\nTotal average daily flow from Town to ECRWRF 2.863 million gallons a day."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt_23727
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/9/2018 1:35:43 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Three short pieces that might amuse you (still working on Obama)\n\nAttachments: French Chauvinism.docx; President Obama and Self-dec.doc; It is difficult to pick the stupidest op.docx"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032538.txt_23728
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032538.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "alcoholic . drugs. unstable . consumate liar. CAREFUL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gosh I don't drink and I never did drugs"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you still own apple?"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:38:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No I sold too soon 110"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033140.txt_23733
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033140.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don, ignores the fact that he has great dangerous power. . tightening the noose too slowly, risks a very bad situation. . gambino was never the commander in chief there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid <IMIMI>", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not a stupid point...he is starting to behave very erratically...."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 7:30:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "borderline insane, and corroberated by some that are close"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032682.txt_23740
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032682.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "xy", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["xy"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "xy", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["xy"], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i m trying to wear the sweater but it has been getting a bit warm here hope you doing well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["x"], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2017, at 2:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what have you been doing? any fun?"}, {"sender": "RR", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im ok .. still waiting for new york trip .. taking the family to dubai for new year &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["RR"], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2017, at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great. have fun. . with the crazy tax bill, Ill stayin US until end of year."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/25/2017 6:02:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "washington post .. new york times .. i think saudis need some help .. maybe our proposal can help .. just a thought"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022947.txt_23754
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022947.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon [iy|"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 3:10:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help ;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents i who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of adinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. --_ ... phone only"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025894.txt_23757
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025894.txt
subject: Re: Re: the mathematical model
messages:
  [{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Re: the mathematical model", "body": "I’m writing about the Iran deal. So far have only sent a form paragraph in response to requests. Below.\n\nNoam\n\nOn Iran, as usual, I’m a gloomy contrarian. I’m glad the treaty was signed, and it’s kind of fun to watch the\nRepublican lunatics shrieking hysterically as they try to kill it (as they may). And Israeli hypocrisy has gone\nwell beyond being comical. But in fact the whole thing is farcical, in my opinon. In the US, Iran is “the\ngreatest threat to world peace”, intoned constantly from on high, in the media, everywhere. There is also such a\nthing as world opinion, as measured by such ultra-radicals as Gallup. It turns out that the greatest threat to\nworld peace is the US, by a very wide margin, no one else even close, and Iran barely mentioned. The\nAmerican population is protected from these unwanted facts by the Free Press: not reported. There is an\norganization called US intelligence. They brief Congress regularly on the international security situation, all\nquite public. On Iran, they point out that it has very limited military power, even by regional standards (a small\nfraction of Saudi Arabia, for example). Its strategic doctrine is defensive. If—a big If—it has plans for nuclear\nweapons, that would be part of its deterrent strategy. Now who would be opposed to Iran having a deterrent\nstrategy? Answer is clear: the rogue states that rampage violently in the region and don’t want any impediment:\nthe US and Israel, also lesser ones like UK and France. One simple way to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons\nwould be to establish a nuclear-weapons free zone in the region, as has been done elsewhere (over US\nobjections). That’s been advocated by the Arab states for 20 years, with very wide global support, including\nIran. It comes up regularly at the 5-year review meetings of the Nonproliferation Treaty, at the UN, again a few\nmonths ago, when, again, it was blocked by the US to protect its Israeli client, which has a huge nuclear\nweapons arsenal and wants to keep it. Again, the population is protected from such facts by the Free Press\n(though in this case there are some fringe exceptions, and of course the Arms Control literature). Same with the\nrest of the litany. Reading the US and UK press is like living in some lunatic asylum. I’m wondering whether\nto write about it — again; have done so repeatedly. It’s like talking to a wall. Iran has an awful government,\nthough by the standards of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, it’s practically heaven.\n\nNevertheless, better to have the treaty than not to, given the nature of the asylum.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 07, 2015 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: the mathematical model", "body": "is quite beautiful, though the basic rules are simple , once they have run over and over again, and produced a result you cannot tease them out by any form of reductionism. or\n\nalgorithm, just like the series 7-21-37... cannot be found by alogrithm, itis simply the difference of cubes, . Have you written about the iran deal?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021740.txt_23758
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021740.txt
subject: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 4:30:53 PM", "subject": "Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html\n\nJeffrey Epstein prosecutor was\npreviously rebuked for handling of a\nchild sex case\n\nJulie K. Brown\n\nNine months before cutting a covert plea deal with sex trafficking suspect Jeffrey\nEpstein, Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta was notified that the lead\n\nprosecutor in Epstein’s case had concealed victim information in another underage\nsex crimes case, the Miami Herald has learned.\n\nThe prosecutor, A. Marie Villafafa, was harshly rebuked by a federal judge in\nJanuary 2007 for what he called her “intentional and/or serious lapse in judgment”\nwhen she failed to explicitly inform him that the defendant, a Texas man who\ntraveled to Florida to have sex with a 14-year-old girl, had a prior history of\npredatory behavior with minors, court records show.\n\nAcosta, her boss at the time, not only knew about Villafafa’s breach — records show\nthat he subsequently defended it. Acosta assigned another prosecutor in his office to\nwrite a treatise for the judge in an unsuccessful attempt to persuade him to soften\nthe stinging language in his order.\n\nSenior U.S. District Court Judge William J. Zloch copied Acosta on his order,\nnoting, “The court is at a total loss as to why the Office of the United States Attorney\nfor the Southern District of Florida, as well as the Assistant United States Attorney\nassigned to the above-styled cause, found it appropriate to intentionally withhold ...\ninformation from the court.”"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt_23763
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 11:18:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn is Andrews accuser,\nlong criminal record. total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or\nreporters to investigate,.. the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone\nanswerer,, she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs\n\nridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt_23770
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt
subject:
  Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Oct 14, 2014 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "I'm almost home. Call there in 10?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 12:23:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031302.txt_23771
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031302.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Players2 <players02@hotmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nTO ROGER STONE\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE\nDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO\nOK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 mu\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM.\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS\n!!!!!"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Thanks,\nRegards,\nDarren"}, {"sender": "\"Michael, Charles\"", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren:\nBest,\nCharles"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 3:50:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.txt_23775
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 7:00:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Well, I guess if there's anybody who can wave thus away, it's Donald. Let me know if there's anything I can do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California \nWill go to press in several hrs \nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another \nman, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we \nwant to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this \nbehalf? \nMy number is________ \nThank you in advance. \nDavid Ingram \nCorrespondent \nReuters News \n, and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt_23777
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick, Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused. Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur # I will call u"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:32:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He said that because he wants to discredit or downgrade u with the person he said it to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt_23781
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt
subject: AVG°
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": "AVG°", "body": "Richard Kahn \nIm not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the \nspy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. you took a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you \ndecided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time \npremium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you set a target. . it hit the \ntraget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you \npanicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, no discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip \nfof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike, is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same \nindex. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re \nbroadcom. the crack happend in the morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is \nno way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you \ncould . would.. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn . i would \nbe less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise \nmoney .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a \nsolution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey \nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will \nsend you over the weekend if that is OK. \nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of \nfocus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from \nmanagement as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger. \nThis morning the pricing is as follows: \nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10 \nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90 \nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. \nHowever I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "Paul Barred", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 5:40:46 PM", "subject": "AVG°", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50. \nAug puts now $6.50"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033403.txt_23783
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033403.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trust me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course | trust you...what is going on?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid as"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 2:46:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she flew to london yesterday . back in dc. tonight dallas. then seatle. then tel aviv. totally jet lagged and cranky"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023278.txt_23786
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023278.txt
subject: ulysses 2.0
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:53 AM", "subject": "ulysses 2.0", "body": "I realize it is only due to a lack of understanind of the job ahead. and not out of any sense of\nunwillingess to pay\n\n- as opposed to merely hiring people to set up a family office, someone will have to do _ the following-\nseparate from the art partnership which is my responsiblity . there still needs to be a huge amount of\nwork done for 2015,16. not to mention that brad at the moment is going to have train the incoming\nteam?? your call\n\nstrategic decisions re estate and other planning , sale of phaidon etc. . in addition setting up for the\naccounting for each strategy te.:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032709.txt_23797
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032709.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 12:46:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also,\ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down\nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn’t offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031470.txt_23800
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031470.txt
subject: Re: tomorrows news today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/05/20/trump-bill-clinton-rape n 10062090. html"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "Yup. Going to be ugly. Who will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "difficult to bet against the card cheat, if you are gambling on the outcome. . I have some great stories , as i have just returned from a week of jeffrey style meetings any time today"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 12:31:20 PM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "Who is the card cheat? Both have aspects. Will call"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt_23803
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolf"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:23:41 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "of course ok to both. .."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff [iS]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and\nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy\nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt_23808
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt
subject: Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <a\nnfw"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Yablon, Aly", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be\nhere until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30.\n\nBest,\n\nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home?\n\n-do you work on alaptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at\nhand? Is the dining room windowless?\n\n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home?\n\n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort?\n\n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred\nbillion dollars? When was this meal?\n\n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival\ngovernments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of\ntheir fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself?\n\n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly\ndied?\n\n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them?\n\n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives?\n\n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004?\n\n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ?\n\n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant?\n\n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through\ntheir own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When\nMichael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you\narranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do\nyou maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy\nmakers and businessmen with whom you often meet?\n\n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York?\n\n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school?\n\n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the\nwomen who work for you accompany you?\n\n-Did you invite Michael to sit inon a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have\ndeveloped promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025880.txt_23812
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025880.txt
subject: Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cathy Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "To: Martin Weinberg, Esq.\n\nDear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island’s manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. while I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\n\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033371.txt_23822
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033371.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/26/2018 7:34:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "direction of trump? criminal tax fraud??\n\nhttps://therealdeal.com/2018/04/26/shvo-settles-tax-evasion-case/?utm_source=The+Real+Deal+E-Lerts&utm_campaign=9f5d9ae9f9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6e806bb87a-9f5d9ae9F9-385784701"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026379.txt_23826
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026379.txt
subject: Re: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve,\n\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more\nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse,\nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition\nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.\n\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!\n\nBest,\n\nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\n\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up\nan opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MlIchael is an International\nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish\nupbringing.\n\nLet me know.\n\nBest,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt_23828
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 4:01:11 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "ill call you from new york"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:55 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "Rich person problem"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "id, Morris concedes that American Dharma could be an uncomfortable experience for those still wrestling with\nthe realities of ‘st'the Trump era in America: \"It's a kind of horror movie,\" says Morris. \"I don't know how\nbetter to describe it.\""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:13 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "It makes no difference whether it was his money. Issue is failure to disclose. Plus, fact that he has lied his\nass off about it makes clear that he knew it was illegal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 11:03 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "I think he makes the argument that it was his , trumps money , making it not illegal. though he also said he\nonly found out afterwards? and the fact according to the indicment was billed as services rendered and\ngrossed up. im sure his acct has flipped anyway. . I did talk in detail to starr yesterday re indicments how\ntrump can make a deal ( special counsel). clintons trash can yes starr gave me more. YECHHHH!."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "Here's a story from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting:\n\nThe principled case for impeachment is clear. What’s missing is the courage.\n\nRead More..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.txt_23834
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.txt
subject: Trump shoots back at Democrats, declares ‘I don’t do cover-ups’
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2019 5:02:24 PM", "subject": "Trump shoots back at Democrats, declares ‘I don’t do cover-ups’", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/05/22/i-dont-do-cover-ups-president-trump-during-rose-garden-press-\nconference.html\n\nhttps://nypost.com/2019/05/22/trump-shoots-back-at-democrats-declares-i-dont-do-cover-\nups/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20190522&tpcc=\nnypbreaking&mpweb=755-7962477-719004712"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023244.txt_23837
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023244.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3 apr. 2018 kl. 16:29", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "im in paris now"}, {"sender": "Lisa Emelia Svensson <Q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Air France has a strejk ... so French\nTrying to rebook later in the week Will let you know"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <- 3 iii >"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but Im encouraged and glad for\nyou. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that 1 not tell him what a disaster lay before\nhim. what would you like me to tell Barry?\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work\nthat i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it\nagain if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very\nsame thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning\nthere was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was\nchosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes i personally\naugmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax,\n\nHe complained for over a year , re his direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was\nnot a surprise after months and moths of warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with\njohn and joe. He ran amok, and as i told you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you\ntold him that he works for you and not for me and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that i gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up\nquestions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. ( that was Eileen _ )\nbut somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the\ntask, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by\ntrying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his\nwork. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and\ncontinued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes , was also my doing , though\nemail after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!!, , your\nresponse was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan\nyou told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the\nforeign funds repatriation plan that 1 had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions\nto make re my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit\nmuch time and make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced\nmess.\n\nThat being said, the tasks at hand are the following.\nYou have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt_23838
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffic"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:36:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising. very hard to be law firm representing\nPOTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly , by\nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031090.txt_23841
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031090.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "6/14/2010 8:18:52 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Elkman <steven.elkman@db.com>", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients"], "timestamp": "Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Steven Elkman/db/dbcom@DBAmericas"], "timestamp": "06/12/2010 07:59 AM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029282.txt_23848
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029282.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hofman"], "timestamp": "3/16/2017 11:26:44 AM", "subject": null, "body": "a HUGE donor advised fund is an elegant solution to the cuts trump proposes to what some consider critical programs. youcould organzie a huge public charity that would continue the work of many worthwhile orgs. not my thing but structurally beautiful. its the wealthiest now stepping into a quasi govt funding. national endowment for arts. climate science. as extraordinary amounts of wealth have moved into private hands. elons and jeff space goals should be mirrored with many other former govt ones. hope to see you soon"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029203.txt_23849
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029203.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 30, 2018, at 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "george church and i having lunch at my istittue at harvard sunday. join.?"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/30/2018 3:32:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm getting there v late on Sunday\nHave filming for Al Gore before\nSee my text re Monday ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030752.txt_23850
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030752.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:26:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ","}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 27, 2015", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ok, anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what time, I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think I am going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop on the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will have a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023250.txt_23853
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023250.txt
subject: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinclla (iii i i!", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Monday, 3 October 2016", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Leon, Iam on the verge of giving up. sorry. I cannot deal with the major incompetence of your family office. I have been vocal about change. you have made none. john castrucci, still involved etc. the bullshit corporate speak, of -our accounting dept , our bookeeping dept our finance dept, the comptroller now gives me responses that --we have heard from Deloitte , I ask, who at Deloite?. -- dont know , the new team at Deloite says the old team was wrong ! what new team? what old team? -- dont know. . Pwe agrees who at PWC ,?? Iask,- dont know. BDO is almost finished - who,? dont know; . akin gump agrees. . Fenn? - not sure. I have spoken to each of karp,, pezner, fenn, brad. joslin, bodian. multiple times . like your office no one in charge with knowledge. so rudderless hysteria . silly beyond belief as this issue is a non event. other issues have been shunted aside that have real consequences. I know you are jet lagged. I am schedule tightly today , but can free myself for 15 minutes if you want . if so have melanie talk to lesley"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:51 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Valuation Discount", "body": "alan told me you are going to meet tomorrow morning. He has asked me to review the presentation. I suggest you see for yourself. since you argued that he was partial architect of the big transaction. you will see. -- bad numbers. unclear assumptions. opaque presentation. no alternatives. no review of agreements. standardized schedules without names , handed out to the dentists.. NOT even up to date inputed numbers , why in the world would they present numbers 4 months old. ??!!/ it is only imputs. dividend assupmtions. a mix of silliness. ( art given to museums is listed as cash out ). discount rates of 13.05 %. what type of number. . 100k for illness expense and funeral, in a spread sheet of 5 billion dollars.? insurance numbers left out. says debra owns half the boat? taxes? all a waste of time A clat probabaly makes sense. however who runs it, if interest rates change. did you give them the assunptions on growth?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <i"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Leon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS__, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked for are-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend If you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the outrageous incompetence in your family office .. Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by the office (sic) that ..., BUT 1 was told by joslin,. , but I was told by . \" why is leon blaming me for ..\" I ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe , had remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your office. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , you told me last week that the emotional reason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring the benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email »where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant ( in brads corporate speak his\" finance dept ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and have pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off , so what if the categories are off. whats the big deal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the tough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im afraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031084.txt_23856
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031084.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (C3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (C3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower! Worked most of fight.\n\nLets plan rather to meet tmr.\n\nLets talk tmr.\n\nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun.\n\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:45:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "perfect"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029565.txt_23865
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029565.txt
subject: Re: you and Chapman
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert Trivers"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 7:45:38 PM", "subject": "Re: you and Chapman", "body": "Nice"}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:36 PM", "subject": "Re: you and Chapman", "body": "attached a message i just sent to President Struppa of Chapman—i am certain that your gift will do the trick—\nand that the West Coast is indeed more convivial and supportive than the East \ni hope i did not f... up your contact with Finkelstein \nCarlos told me of the devastation to your island—pretty much as i feared \nam amused (at a safe distance) as Bannon takes on Trump—he responds as he always does, threatening a suit \nhe will not in fact file \nno internet in my home or nearby in the great, retarded country of Jamaica so i am now at a restaurant some 35 \nminutes away and only go on-line twice a day—hoping that i will work instead \nall best"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028848.txt_23871
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028848.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:55:07 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Can you talk now?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "if you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-fortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt_23875
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2019 2:42:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have thought many, many things about you over the years,,,,,never thought you were my cheryl....."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but ,,,"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise | will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....Ahhhhmmmm....first reaction is déja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know | am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt_23879
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031709.txt
subject: Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2016 7:53:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: BBC News: A silver lining in #TrumpTapes story", "body": "I saw this on the BBC News App and thought you should see it:\n\nA silver lining in #TrumpTapes story\nWhile the video of Donald Trump denigrating women has horrified\n\nmany, the backlash has also showed how much has changed for\nwomen. Trumps PUSSY Gate"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt_23884
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032906.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 1:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dinner with woody sun?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 2:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "7?"}, {"sender": "David Blaine [qT]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": "David Blaine [qT]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Perfect"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Blaine"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:08:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt_23886
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033008.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Navigate wash views on intl law and sanctions"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why does he need counsel?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017, at 10:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume you do not want to represent. Hamad bin jassim? Qatar. Hired Ashcroft. ? Silly, Anyone you would like to suggest for him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We're you on tv today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Jun 12, 2017, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun? When are you in New York this week"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All week. How do you know if you have appendicitis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017, at 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lower right side excrutiating"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Maybe Trump wants to get impeached. Going after Mueller is declaring holy war."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 1:32:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "However not firing him might be suicide"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020143.txt_23889
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020143.txt
subject: Fwd: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Sinofsky PO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:48:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below...\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures\nfounder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing\n—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors\n\nthat she should get a male co-founder.\n\ne She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before\n\nremembering it's rooted in sexism."}, {"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "View in browser\n\nPro Rata\n\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva -Feb 21, 2018\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops\nand tips at kia@axios.com or find me on Twitter at @imkialikethecar."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt_23890
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt
subject: Fwd: woody and deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["soon yi previn"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:28:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: woody and deadline", "body": "22?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum\nsent me....I found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need\nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than\nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years.\n\nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next\n\nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing\n\nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and\n\nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those.\n\nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by\n\ncomputer."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt_23895
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 2:09:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can chat now. Or if not, when works?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "time to talk today, ? now that the book is a dud, no trump, clinton etc. I woudl like to move forward."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt_23898
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032912.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals [email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt_23905
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt
subject: Fwd: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant <etienne.binant@example.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen \nI hope you are having a great week. \nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on? \nIf not yet, when please \nthanks"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach. \nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or \nanything of the kind. \nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already \nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home). \nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great \nartists when they need it. \nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source. \nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, \nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in \nperson. \nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source. \nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication \nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 feyrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren \nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging) \nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in \nfact, it has started) \nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:11:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt_23906
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lajcak Miroslav/MINISTER/MZV"], "timestamp": "sobota, marca 24, 2018 6:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028605.txt_23909
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028605.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in this communication is\nconfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may\nconstitute inside information, and is intended only for\nthe use of the addressee. It is the property of\n\nJEE\n\nUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this\ncommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited\nand may be unlawful. If you have received this\ncommunication in error, please notify us immediately by\nreturn e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and\ndestroy this communication and all copies thereof,\nincluding all attachments."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe , tomorrow."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt_23913
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\nthere, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday\nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs,\ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back\nhere as \"reported fact.\" Problem with ]story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and\nunlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they\nmight. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are\npublic people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk\ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ME 2k: tren"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt_23914
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031735.txt
subject: Trump; Prince of Believers .docx
messages:
  [{"sender": "aziza alah madi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:48:34 AM", "subject": "Trump; Prince of Believers .docx", "body": "Attachments: Trump; Prince of Believers .docx; Untitled attachment 454977.htm\n\nImportance: — High\n\nhttps://www.google.ca/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/20/saudi-aramco-ceo-says-to-sign-50-billion-of-\ndeals-with-u-s-companies.html\n\nhttp://www.argaam.com/en/article/articledetail/id/486123"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt_23920
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030785.txt
subject: Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:43:53 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "sums it up well. , needs to add melania. pressure, bibi indictment. jared money grubbing. recipe \nfor tragedy"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt_23922
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Blac Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:39:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberr", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number | and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt_23931
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033020.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sent you his book cover, he has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. on the short list."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt_23937
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt
subject: RE: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 5:40:45 PM", "subject": "RE: update", "body": "666"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around it been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019465.txt_23938
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019465.txt
subject: Fw: Oscar Diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/7/2013 2:03:11 PM", "subject": "Fw: Oscar Diary", "body": "I am struggling thru this. It is so late already. I am so stressed out. Will finishe is in a day or two.. I can not write about the Katzenberg party. Maybe can just mention is happened in my hotel. But the reason to go was to support Katzenberg and network. More to come. Peg"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 07, 2013 08:51 AM", "subject": "Oscar Diary", "body": "It's Thursday morning on Wilshire Boulevard and the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has just opened it's doors for ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast. \n\nForty voting members, the distinguished director Norman Jewison and I are on a long single file line that snakes thru the lobby patiently waiting to go upstairs to pick up our tickets. My seats were awarded via a lottery system. We clutch our photo I.D. \n\nSuddenly, a messenger slips in wearing a smart khaki windbreaker and cuts through the line. He announces to the uniformed guard in a stage whisper, \"Dreamworks\", and as if Steven Spielberg himself had just delivered the Gettysburg address, is ushered upstairs. \n\nThat is the final act of social justice of the \"Lincoln\" campaign. \n\nI am sleep deprived and jet lagged having just spent six hours on a flight sitting next Paula Wagner who is Tom Cruise's ex-agent turned Broadway producer for Jessica Chastain's \"The Heiress\". We discuss Jessica's not so great chances to beat Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress. I mention Harvey Weinstein's concern about Emmanuel Riva's last minute surge. The French phenomena doesn't speak English, has never been to L.A. and it's like voting for a ghost, even on her 86th birthday. \n\nThis is the year I got phone calls in September from top studio executives announcing each are winning the Oscar. Their euphoric giddiness is due to the quality of the films resulting in the priciest oscar campaigns on record and astounding audience support at the theaters. \n\nSeven of the nine best picture nominees have taken in well over $100 million at the domestic box office to date, but it's the worldwide numbers in the millions that are staggering. \n\nTwentieth Century Fox's \"Life of Pi\" caused a tsunami at $595, Universal's \"Les Miserables\" scored $412, the Weinstein Cos.' \"Django Unchained\" whipped up $395, DreamWorks' \"Lincoln\" delivered at $254, Warner's \"Argo\" captured $219, Weinstein's \"Silver Lining Playbook\" danced to $187 and Sony's \"Zero Dark Thirty\" killed at $107 million. \n\nIn comparison, Sony Classics' \"Amour\" received $19 and Fox Searchlights' \"Beast of the Southern Wild\" worked up $19 million. \n\nHugh audiences having actually seen the films this year have an ear for the nuances of the Oscar race and everyone including Ben Affleck follow the bloggers religiously. \n\nSo by Thursday morning on line at the Academy the informed buzz was as follows: \"Argo\" takes best picture because is was most entertaining. The director snub to Ben Affleck was a Godsend as George Clooney's advice came from far away Berlin where he was in pre-production on \"The Monuments Men\". Warner's president Sue Kroll kept the campaign clean and calm on the home front. \n\n\"Lincoln's\" victory is Daniel Day Lewis from day one of shooting, no pun intended. The suggestion that Obama is our answer to Lincoln was interesting. Voters knew Obama secretly hosted three screenings in the White House, but they weren't invited. The Hollywood Foreign press were the biggest winners with Bill Clinton's surprise appearance on their broadcast. DreamWorks' ran an impeccable patriotic campaign that the media ate up. \n\nThe best director race had the most drama. Hollywood dreaded Spielberg loosing to Ang Lee. (Eventually everyone was thrilled Steven was anointed president of the Cannes Jury for 2013 the day after the awards show.) \n\nThe voters knew beloved Ang Lee's three year boat ride was the technical miracle. Fox's $595 million international box office blew in the win. \n\nHarvey Weinstein having three horses running is always the most talked about. His loquacious Quentin Taratino was a lock for screenplay. Best supporting actor was a total toss up with a sentimental edge to Robert DeNiro. We even applauded Bob putting his handprints in cement in front of Grauman's Chinese Theater. \n\nThe conversations continued about how our government put the cabasch on \"Zero Dark Thirty\" with their arrogant denial of enhanced interrogation. Even MPAA President Chris Dodd could not help Mark Boal, Katherine Bigalow and Amy Pascal. \n\nAdditional chatter was the renewed last minute love for \"Les Miserables\". Clearly the most polarizing film in the race, this 27 year old theatrical musical seen by 60 million fans is now the talk of the Oscar weekend. \n\nHugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Russell Crowe, Amanda Segfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sasha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter and Samanthe Barks are making an historic one time live performance as part of Sunday's television broadcast. Producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron's will attempt to razzel dazzel us with an homage to movie musicals for three plus hours at the Dolby theater. \n\nBarbra Streisand, Adele and Shirley Basse's appearances also create high anxiety and a blood bath for tickets...hence the hysteria created by DreamWorks' messenger cutting the line. \n\nAfter checking into the iconic Beverly Hills Hotel, my home away from home for 30 years of Oscar weekends and meticulously laying out all the ensembles sent from Valentino and Ralph Rucci, I hit the party circuit overdressed for life."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt_23958
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030578.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: <no subject>", "body": "Call me"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 17:48:01 2011", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest- couple-j effrey- ep stein- and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\"\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Steams in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity\nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte.\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I\nhadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a\npackage at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\"\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He\nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few\nmoments in his company and you know this to be true.\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that\n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his\nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what\nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other\nfinanciers hang out with him.\nAnd Ghislaine?\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to.\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours\ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is\ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent\nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even\nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill\nClinton with whom she is close friends.\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When\nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her\nvulnerability.\nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck;\ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\"\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect\nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his\nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving\na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that\nstrange.\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful\npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues,\nand moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't\ntend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't\nquite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has\nbeen open about.\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her\nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always.\nLook at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up\nfor all sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt_23968
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032869.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. He actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up. Did you ever speak to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:47:12 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt_23970
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033167.txt
subject: Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records | TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/21/2016 12:01:29 PM", "subject": "Trump-Clinton debate expected to shatter records | TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/2968 18-trump-clinton-debate-expected-to-shatter-ratings-records"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt_23980
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033173.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/3/2016 11:10:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hi Jeffrey long time now hear don't sweat Patterson was with trump last week small dinner he really would\nmake a good financial steward no agenda woody is busting his ass for him Rudy too wiki leaks tonight on\nHillary stopped caring fed wants to raise I guess terrible luck brexit Deutschebank then probably some terror\nthing smart to be out of it best jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021556.txt_23988
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021556.txt
subject: 31E-MM-108062, 08/07/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "31E-MM-108062, 08/07/2008", "body": "Please deliver the enclosed letter and brouchures to\nIn addition, please confirm completion of this\n\nmatter.\nRead and Clear"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt_23990
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031114.txt
subject: The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "Global Asset Allocation \n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\n*   Asset allocation –– Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market correlations to remain much lower than in recent years. \n\n*   Economics –– US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are responding to higher taxes.    \n\n*   Fixed Income –– Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\n\n*   Equities –– Japan remains our main country overweight.  \n\n*   Credit –– We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the core.\n\n*   Currencies –– Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the dollar.\n\n*   Commodities –– Stay long Brent and short gasoline. \n\n*   US stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds are generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains the troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt. \n\n*   Our overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead a number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk premia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been largely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”. \n\n*   In addition, we are seeing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into a bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD activity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst offsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile for the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\n*   Without a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a local impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this environment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various markets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our view of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term investors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\n*   Local issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese policy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The strong control of the government and its high approval rating are steadily raising the chance of success. We stay overweight Japanese equities and grow wary of the short yen trade, as capital inflows and rising growth expectations (chart of right) are ultimately bullish for the currency. Watch next week’s BoJ meeting, led by newly appointed Governor Kuroda, for new reflationary measures.  \n\n*   The Euro area economy remains in recession, while policy makers are making little effort to reverse the contraction. We monitor signs of any large deposit flight post Cyprus over coming weeks and months to judge whether the bailout may actually be worsening conditions in the Euro. Economic forecast momentum remains negative (chart of right). These are good reasons to underweight the Euro area, if not all of Europe, across asset classes, against the rest of the world. \n\n*   The US, in contrast, is seeing better spending from both corporates and consumers than we could have expected post Fiscal Cliff and sequestration. But given the huge amount of fiscal drag, which is a fact, we want to see another 1-2 months of data before extrapolating the good news. It did support US equities in recent weeks, which continue to benefit from US corporates issuing debt to buy their own shares and others', through M&A. This corporate rotation from debt to equities is almost exclusively a US flow, which helps explain US equity outperformance. \n\n*   Across risk assets, we are similarly seeing huge delinking, with equities rallying greatly and commodities and credit seeing no gains (chart p. 1), very much unlike last year. Commodities are delinking as there are no growth upgrades in EM, and inflation concerns are concentrated on two countries, UK and Japan. Credit is delinking as most investors are massively overweight credit versus equities, as evidenced by the disparity in buying flows in 2011-12. Relevering by US corporate and the Fed debating the end of QE are signaling that the 3-decade long rally in bonds is likely over. Investors are starting to dollar-average away from bonds to equities. \n\nFixed Income\n\n*   Bonds rallied again, except for Euro area peripherals, the source of this week’s market concerns. The imposition of capital controls on Cypriot deposits is to be sure a watershed moment, but for now not one we expect to spark significant deposit withdrawals elsewhere. Meanwhile, the most likely outcome to the Italian impasse appears to be new elections in the autumn. With seemingly little prospect of a material rise in yields on the safest assets, we think the search for carry evident across the full gamut of asset markets will see peripheral spreads narrow over time. \n\n*   Ten-year JGB yields have rallied to within a few bps of their all-time low, ahead of next week’s inaugural meeting for the new BoJ leadership. We do indeed expect aggressive easing, with JGB purchases out to 30 years, but think this will be trumped by profit taking in JGBs after the fiscal year end. \n\n*   Our latest Inflation Expectations Survey (F. Diamond, K. Gupta) was out yesterday. One interesting result is that almost 90% of respondents believe the BoJ has less than a 50/50 shot of hitting its 2% inflation target in two years, a reflection of the formidable challenge of sparking inflation expectations after two decades of falling prices. \n\nEquities\n\n*   The global rally in equity markets slowed this week, but did not reverse, on continued concerns about the fallout from a poorly executed Cyprus solution. The Euro area underperformed again, for a second week in a row.  As discussed last week, we view Cyprus as a local problem that we address by underweighting Euro area equities in a global portfolio. A potential negative feedback loop from markets to the economy poses a serious downside risk for Euro area growth over coming months prolonging the current run of negative economic surprises from the region.\n\n*   Japan is the region we like the most. In our mind the Japanese equity trade has further legs not only due to prospective BoJ balance sheet expansion but more importantly due to a reform agenda to be unveiled into the summer.  \n\n*   EM equities are suffering from renewed policy tightening in major EM economies such as Brazil and China. Investors have bitter memories of previous property tightening measures in China. As within DM, we see a lot of divergences within EM and prefer to focus on under-owned markets with good domestic demand story such as Mexico and Malaysia.  See “Consensus Asset Allocation”, Adrian Mowat and team, Mar 26th. Open overweights in Mexican and Malaysia equities vs MSCI EM.\n\n*   For long-term investors we just released our quarterly publication \"Trade opportunities for long term investors\" Mar 27. We monetize risk premia in Value stocks via a long in S&P500 Value vs S&P500 ETFs. It appears that a five year long underperformance of Value stocks has come to an end. We take profit on trades that monetize skew risk premia in S&P500 due to sharp contraction over the past quarter. We continue to monetize equity risk premia via buying high dividend yield equity ETFs against USTs. Our preference is to buy ETFs which track the S&P US Preferred stock due to its high yield, around 6%, and its high weight on Financials. \n\nCredit\n\n*   The news flow from the Cypriot bailout continued to push spreads wider and vol higher this week, with European Financials underperforming as creditor bail-in risks returned to the forefront. iTraxx senior and subordinated financials indices widened 20bp as investors sought to hedge via CDS rather than sell bonds. European credit continued to underperformed US credit.\n\n*   The fact that Cypriot banks debt is only 1.3% of total liabilities was a key factor in the decision to bail-in depositors. Yet events surrounding the banking sector restructuring also suggest that keeping senior unsecured bondholders immune from costly bail-outs is politically untenable. This removes the implicit ‘cover’ that senior bonds holders have enjoyed and has increased speculation that implementation of the bail-in proposals under the EU’s Resolution & Recovery Directive (RRD) will be brought forward to 2015 from the current 2018 time-frame.\n\n*   As such, our colleagues in European Credit have examined the implications of changing recovery rate expectations across the bank capital structure. Assuming that covered bonds remain outside the scope of the proposals, we expect senior bank bond spreads to widen relative to covered bonds and prefer being OW covered bonds vs senior bonds in the periphery, particularly in Spain where covered bonds have first claim over the entire mortgage book of the bank. From a relative value point of view, we also suggest owning subordinated bank bonds vs senior bank bonds in the core as, under the new RRD regime, there is a higher probability than before that senior bank bond holders will lose money and this risk is, in our mind, not yet in the price (Rethinking the capital structure, R. Henriques et al., Mar 27).\n\nForeign Exchange\n\n*   Today’s research note, Sacrificing Cyprus, examines several presumptions which have arisen over the past two weeks due to the Cyprus crisis, and scores them on a scale of truths, half-truths and falsehoods. There are indeed some right conclusions to draw from this experience, but also some wrong ones. As examples, it is true that capital controls have created a two-tier euro, but very unlikely that Cyprus is exiting EMU. And while it is true that markets deserve a risk premium for policy uncertainty, the size of the premium should be much lower than in previous crises due to backstops like the OMT.\n\n*   For example, during the first Greek crisis in May 2010 EUR undershot by 10% relative to cyclical conditions at that time, and during Greek elections in May 2012 the currency undershot by 5%. The combination of Italian and Cypriot events have eliminated the euro’s overvaluation from early 2013, when the currency spiked to the high $1.30s on a presumption that LTRO funds would be repaid rapidly, driving European rates higher. The currency is now close to fair value, so carries no risk premium for contagion. The message is similar in vol markets: the 1% premium for 3-mo implied versus realized vol is far less than the 5% premium witnessed during previous crises. \n\n*   While there is no evidence that the EUR/USD cash or options market carries a risk premium, it is also true that the required premium should probably be far less than in previous crises given that a sovereign funding backstop like the OMT is in place. We are thus reluctant to extrapolate this mini-crisis into a systemic event which triggers broad deleveraging, or to forecast trend euro weakness. The currency could trade down a couple of cents around an ECB rate cut, but assuming that fears around Cyprus contagion pass in a month or two, the currency should reverse its recent decline by the summertime. \n\nCommodities \n\n*   Commodities rallied this week, up almost 2%, led by energy. We went tactically long Brent in last week’s J.P. Morgan View as we believed that the correction in oil markets had brought prices too far below our price forecast of $112/bbl. Since then Brent is up around 1.5%. We stay long and expect further price appreciation over coming months. We are also short gasoline vs. Brent. Gasoline cracks (the premium for gasoline over crude prices) spiked over the first three months of the year due to a combination of low inventories and refinery closures that came during refinery maintenance season. As refinery maintenance comes to a close and demand falls seasonally, gasoline prices should fall relative to Brent. \n\n*   We went long Soybean time spreads late last year (GMOS, Dec 5) on a view that much higher Brazilian supplies would find it difficult to leave the country due to logistical constraints. Since then we have seen a record number of ships planning to load soybeans in Brazilian ports and this number is still rising. The average waiting time before loading is also rising, now 38 days compared to 26 days a month ago. This has caused the front Soybean contract to rally while longer maturity contracts have been depressed by the much higher than normal supply inside the country. The spread between the May-13 and Jul-13 contracts has doubled since we put the trade on in December. We stay long as we think these logistical issues are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt_23993
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt
subject: RE: ICYMI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "ICYMI\nMy occasional roundup of interesting links and\nwriting I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\nNew and Notable\n* We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock Partners. LINK\n* And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the LinkedIn team!\nLINK\n* Change.org celebrates its 100 million users milestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO\nBen Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n* Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new civic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor\nmarket.\" Tom Friedman's post: LINK\n* Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer online coding camp using Minecraft.\nLINK\nWorthwhile Reads\n* Jeff Weiner: How LinkedIn is Helping Power the President's Tech Jobs Initiative\nLINK\n* The New Yorker: R U There? - Nancy Lublin and Crisis Text Line LINK\n* Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n* Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined Infrastructure LINK\n* Sheryl Sandberg's powerful tribute to Dave Goldberg. LINK\nSome of My Recent Essays\n* Wired: Why the block chain matters LINK\n* Financial Times: Acquiring proven entrepreneurs is a smart way to innovate\nLINK\n* Press Start to Continue: One More Role of Founders LINK\nTo Watch\n* My conversation with Peter Thiel at CEIBS LINK\n* I enjoyed participating in this fun video by Founders Forum imagining what life would be like for\ntech entrepreneurs if the World Wide Web had never been invented. LINK\nInterviews\n* Vox: My discussion with Ezra Klein on the biggest lie employers tell employees\nLINK\n* Entrepreneur: Why I'm betting big on Bitcoin LINK\n* HuffPo: My discussion with Dawn Nakagawa in advance of the WorldPost conference\nLINK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "Sunday, July 05, 2015 2:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2015 5:04:31 PM", "subject": "RE: ICYMI", "body": "slow progress.\nplanning to see you in August.\nHope you're well."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt_24001
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt
subject: Re: July 22
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "6/27/2009 11:22:50 AM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "now is fine"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Jun 27 07:04:52 2009", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "Call me this afternoon\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Jun 26, 2009, at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "So I go to a designer's cocktail party last night and Jonanthan and Kimberly Farkus are there telling me about your coming home\ncelebration and there might be on seat left on his cousin's plane....do you know about this?\n\nI mentioned that you said there was no \"release\" party...\n\nIam coming if there is one- if you don't a \"surprise\" event- you might want to get into this.\nYour friends are counting the days to freedom...\n\nWent to Heyward Isham's funeral today...father of Ralph and Chris...very sad. Old wasp diplomat who was our Ambassador to\nHaiti in 60's- sounds like CIA....is CIA\n\nGoing to dinner with Amy Irving, her husband and Mario Platero, a brilliant Italian G@ewish) journalist- very chic- wife in\nEngand- he travels with Obama...runs big news agency here- very funny- you will love him- will introduce in your new life..\n\nCannes Diary finally went to press...\n\nWas in LA for 3 days of meetings with every studio...working hard for the business...it's there, but it'a like begging to get them\nto spend so we spend our days getting underwriting...thank God I have a guy in the office that does this...\n\nPoured all day in Hamptons- sun just came out...\n\nMiss you...\nxoxo Peg"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027038.txt_24008
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027038.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how much time should i allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 2:59:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, For taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready And , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd for a YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YIVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt_24009
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:34:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt_24010
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026326.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way out. . . execution not to his liking but on another note , what were you thinking about me in the book, with what moniker"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what I think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of Trump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff Doesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him until the end."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnks for letting me sound smart:)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 8:25:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I haven't done that party yet..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt_24011
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["reid"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when 7 told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure that doing good was going to be the goal\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html"}, {"sender": "Joi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "me)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt_24021
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt
subject: Missing message
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers FS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 8:21:20 PM", "subject": "Missing message", "body": "no evidence you got the latest so i have sent you just the key message itself—rather long so 1 have put in bold\nthe only references to Enhanced Learning Foundation—references had to do with paying Amy Jacobson 30\ngrand for a year of work on Honour killings—my own expenses covered by myself\n\nof course i know little or nothing about stocks but i do feel like Trump is nothing but bad news for them, which\n\nfrightens me, given that he has 2 more years—it has cost me >$100,000 recently not for obvious economic\nreasons but because it looks like we have no one sensible in charge of the whole country\n\nDecember 16\n\nam good so far\n\nhad a very productive two days with my research assistant Amy Jacobson in New Jersey\nwe now have 60+ papers on honour killings in Jersey and another 20 in Jamaica\nespecially important areas are Pakistan, Turkey (Kurds), Saudi Arabia and India\n\nlots of variation in mating system, form of homicide, reasons given, frequency of multiple victims and/or\nmultiple perpetrators, degree of retribution and so on\n\nam working out the logical details on inheritance—females seem invariably to count for 1/2 of what a male does\nin Islam\n\nparallel-cousin marriages—father's brother—occur in the desserts of Saudi Arabia—it radiated out from there\nwith Islam—such systems are selected in competition with each other, as in Iraq—two paternal lineages bind\nagainst others similarly binding\n\ndeserts in other primates are often associated with more intense male-male between group fighting, e.g.\nhamadryas vs regular baboons—that we were doing more than riding the camels in the dessert is suggested by\nthe fact that a lactose-tolerant gene arose in that area related to the lactose of camels, so we were apparently\nmilking our camels !\n\ni believe you have heard of the Enhanced Learning Foundation; it got me to where i am today on this\nsubject, and perhaps it may wish to go further\n\ni intend to do a year of intense work and then summarise. i was never mentally as fast as you and i am certainly\nnot getting faster with age (76 this February) but i do have a good eye for fundamental logic and i believe this\nwill be the last serious project in my life--i will not let go until i have wrapped this whole thing up, especially\n\nwith the help of Amy, who is now putting together a master Excel file on all this\n\ni plan a book on all of this of course, it will be co-authored by Dr Jacobson"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt_24032
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026440.txt
subject: Re: Subject to change
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "So the publisher wants me to trim down 700 to 400 pages in \"The Best of...\" collection. Tsk tsk. Below will be the revised mini-essay to serve as the final piece. Although I detest Trump, to be fair, I realized, thanks to you, that I had no evidence that he had raped a 13-year-old, though I did have have evidence that, as an adult, there was evidence that she made an accusation. Also, I added another sentence with a positive ending. Meanwhile, Happy Earth Day.\n\nThe Last Word: Yikes!\nWhen George W. Bush was elected president in the year 2000, it was due to the electoral college (a rigged system which originally intended to prevent slaves from voting and evolved to gerrymandering), even though Bush's opponent, Al Gore, won the national popular vote. Hillary Clinton was elected senator that year, and she announced that the first thing she would do was to get rid of the electoral college. A few years later, as a columnist for the New York Press, I sent her a letter asking about the status of that promise. She didn't reply.\nOn November 8, 2016, a crooked businessman, liar extraordinaire, bragging pussy-grabber, make-America-white-again, anti-choice, anti-Semite, fake Christian, accused rapist of a 13-year-old in 1994 (she canceled a press conference one week before the election because of death threats if she filed a lawsuit), climate-change hoaxer, twitter addict, homophobic, apprentice politician, fucking fascist, and Vladimir Putin's \"useful idiot,\" namely Donald Trump, who was elected as an insanely narcissistic dictator based on the electoral college, whereas his opponent, Hillary Clinton, won the national popular vote by almost three million individuals galore, to no avail.\nIrony lives. But the monster has inadvertently awakened a population to resist."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "4/23/2017 11:20:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Subject to change", "body": "you can read the guardian article on the alleged 13 year old. put up to it by a pr guy, former jerry springer sales pitch man"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt_24033
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt
subject: FW: Daily Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["GMAX"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:29:24 +0000", "subject": "Re: Daily Mail", "body": "Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. Fax: Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted."}, {"sender": "Kevin Maxwell", "recipients": ["NY Max"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:11 -0500", "subject": "Fw: Daily Mail", "body": "Please see below. My take:A) voluntary rules are meaningless in terms of arranging for a cessation of crap articles/stories etcB) doesn't offer redress (financial or in terms of publicity.Law here definitely provides more protection and redress if individual(s) involved in approaches from newspapers are employees or have any form of contractual relationship with target.Let's talk.Kevin"}, {"sender": "GMAX", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 11 2011 12:54 AM", "subject": "FW: Daily Mail", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt_24034
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033593.txt
subject: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:12:10 PM", "subject": "B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey, \nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this. \nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with \nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,. \nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you: \nMr. Tarek El Sayed, \nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you. \nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for \nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like \nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase. \nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department \nwere as follows: \n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.) \nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr \nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations. \nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also \nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for \nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport \ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring \ncountries. \nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of \nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and \nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable. \nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many \nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading \nits path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have \nseen already. \nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft \nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility. \nSincerely, \nLawrance Visoski \nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt_24035
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032855.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope you are well. photos look good. fyi I receive many calls a week about both Donald (, beauty contest. mara lago etc) and clinton from reporters. less so recently with clinton , but my answers are always i have nothing to say. or i try to ignore altogether. A few times i have been ambushed on the street with questions . but am more careful now"}, {"sender": "Tom Barrack Private", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope ur good. Let's catch up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 5:32:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "send photos of you and child. -- make me smile"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt_24040
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032699.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 7:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 1:49:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just reading this...will call this morn..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt_24041
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt
subject: Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Mr. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "I was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\nThanks for your consideration.\nInvestigative Reporter,\nFoxNews.com\n2044 Armacost Avenue\nLos Angeles, CA 90025"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt_24052
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031286.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:45:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE", "body": "JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!\nAttachments: 2016.08.17 - Draft Letter to Eric Rayman re Epstein Book re Steven Hoffe....docx; Untitled attachment 110342.htm\n\nImportance: — High"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt_24076
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
subject: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, \nmedia, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by \nmail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. \nI left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that \nI would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great \npotential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could \nnever understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of \n1 \nyou (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. \nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared \nfor this."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am \ntrying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me \nto give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't \nthink you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories! \nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have \npeople coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your \nhelp. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize \nyou're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help \nme otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "what do you suggest?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, February 15, 2016 3:25 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Still have Zorro V pjs... Perfect for my lonely Valentine's Day. © \nSo, what do you think about my suggestion to help? \nHow are you holding up?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt_24077
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "<x>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<x>"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in florida ,"}, {"sender": "<>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<>"], "timestamp": "On Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night ."}, {"sender": "<x>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<x>"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. ifi1am here"}, {"sender": "<_____>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait .. will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_____>"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 1:38:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. 1 m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032672.txt_24082
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032672.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "????"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i forget to ask.. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2017 10:53:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m trying to wear the sweater but it has been geeting a bit warm here° hope you doing well"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033578.txt_24086
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033578.txt
subject:
  Adam Pashut shared a link: Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump

messages:
  [{"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 4:30:33 PM", "subject": "Adam Pashut shared a link: Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump", "body": "Where God had sex with Maria: Israel joins trend with welcome video for Trump from Ran Harnevo's Tweet\nDownload the Twitter app"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt_24098
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt
subject: CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST
messages:
  [{"sender": "Brad Edwards", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 3:49:11 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST", "body": "I expect a crisp, new bill. Your personalized message can say whatever you would like but it should include, \"you win!\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031279.txt_24102
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031279.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren K. Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM", "body": "Regards,\n\nDarren"}, {"sender": "Steven J. Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt_24111
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "11111 \"girls?\"„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on or next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "• lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031699.txt_24118
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031699.txt
subject: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky
messages:
  [{"sender": "Fred Simon", "recipients": ["Ralph Simon"], "timestamp": "November 3, 2013 at 4:07:53 PM CST", "subject": "Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "VERY INTERESTING. G"}, {"sender": "Brad Bowen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 04, 2013 9:42 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Michael S. Buchholtz"], "timestamp": "11/4/2013 4:06:12 PM", "subject": "FW: Rabbi Steven Pruzansky", "body": "MB: this sums up my feelings on the direction of the country and the blind loyalty of Democratic Jews. I trust I do not offend. Its blunt but in many ways true. tk"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030587.txt_24122
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030587.txt
subject: crazy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty MacKenzie [kirsty.mackenzie@bbc.co.uk]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "crazy", "body": "We are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, \nhowever inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that \nthe various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the \nmost important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many \nrespects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and \ninternational news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means \nthe global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts \nincluding US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, \nformer President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al \nGore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul \nMcCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the \nmost important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - or this email address. \nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "crazy", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032896.txt_24126
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032896.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 3:05:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ponzi-schemer-steven-hoffenberg-pledges-50-million-to-help-trump/article/2593931"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033198.txt_24132
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033198.txt
subject: Doctor Behind Knock-Off “Cancer Moonshot” Meets with Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/22/2016 5:35:05 PM", "subject": "Doctor Behind Knock-Off “Cancer Moonshot” Meets with Trump", "body": "FYI\nhttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/602954/doctor-behind-knock-off-cancer-moonshot-meets-with-trump/?utm_campaign=internal&utm_medium=homepage&utm_source=top-stories_3&set=602951"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031523.txt_24138
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031523.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\n\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:13:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt_24142
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 4:42:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now good?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032882.txt_24145
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032882.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:02:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033222.txt_24153
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033222.txt
subject: Fwd: February 2nd Hot Topic Briefing: Challenging Immigration Detention with Habeas Petitions
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:02:59 PM", "subject": "Fwd: February 2nd Hot Topic Briefing: Challenging Immigration Detention with Habeas Petitions", "body": "Thought you'd find it amusing that the legal education providers are already on top of Trump issues. LOL."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt_24155
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "train? yes, i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 09:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022197.txt_24157
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022197.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations. She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out M, in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "it was only meant as a pun on"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, cute just a joke about people's unique sensitivities. You must have heard many this week. How are You doing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "sexy cute"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032894.txt_24170
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032894.txt
subject: Re: Since you are super well connected...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "A small point on the election that maybe you think might have some value for HC \n1-In Europe a LOT of citizens start becoming very angry and voting for populist parties \n2-A major reason is that the interconnected world shows them every minute on their smartphones how rich \npeople are living and envy sets in (especially with raising inequality that is perfectly normal when financial \nreturns of rich people are exponential and work returns are linear) \n3-They want change and risk electing completely wrong people (Italy 5stelle, France LePen might be next, \nHungary, Greece already lost, Brexit and anti-trade another example) \n4-US election is over, Trump has destroyed himself as expected (I was in Wharton with Donald Jr, 3.95GPA \nvs. 2.5 GPA but he thought he was a god... what a family) \nthe message: \n5-Maybe HC can use the last debates to create weapons for change. She could acknowledge that she \nunderstands that people want change, and ask for a clear majority in the senate thinking abou that instead of \npresidential elections. Then if she does bad in 4 years she is out, but she could make the public understand \nthat senate is key to show what a president can do. \nBut again, I know 0.001% of what you or them understands about politics, I am however worried that europe \nis just 5 or 10 years ahead on this trend compared to the US in anti-establishment feelings and I have seen \nwith friends how irrational and influenceable masses can become in voting when they are frustrated (Hitler \nwas elected after all...) \nHope to see you soon!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "agreed"}, {"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 2:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "Thanks for answering, your opinion on many life aspects means a lot to me"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gianni Serazzi"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 6:16:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "lets see how he hnadles the debate tonight. he sholud apologize to hillary and ask her to do the same."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033234.txt_24173
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033234.txt
subject: The Party Girl Who Brought Trump to His Knees - The Daily Beast
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/24/2017 8:32:33 AM", "subject": "The Party Girl Who Brought Trump to His Knees - The Daily Beast", "body": "Stayed with this woman in st moritz. Was in NYC for a while.\nGino\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/01/the-party-girl-who-brought-trump-to-his-knees.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014695.txt_24178
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014695.txt
subject: Meet with our Global Head of Commodities - Monday at 10:15am at One Bryant Park
messages:
  [{"sender": "Amanda Ens", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "1/27/2017 8:03:49 PM", "subject": "Meet with our Global Head of Commodities - Monday at 10:15am at One Bryant Park", "body": "Please let me know if you’re interested in joining a small group meeting with our head of Global Commodities. Apologies for the short notice but they just created this based on client request.\n\nMonday, January 30 at 10:15am at One Bryant Park (42nd St & 6th Ave), Room 5F\n\nFrancisco Blanch is a managing director and head of Global Commodities and Derivatives Research. Regular Research publications include: The Global Energy Weekly, Commodity Portfolio Monthly and Quantitative Investment Strategies Monthly. Research produced by the Commodities, Asset Allocation, and Global Derivatives teams has been recognized by Institutional Investor, Extel, Greenwich, Bloomberg, or Energy Risk, among others. Previously he was Head of Global Asset Allocation Research. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, Blanch was an energy economist focusing on global oil & gas in the commodity research group at Goldman Sachs & Co. and consulted for the European Commission and other public and private organizations. Blanch has a masters degree in public administration from Harvard University and a doctorate in economics from Complutense University of Madrid.\n\nKey topics of discussion:\n\n1 - OPEC / Saudi Policy - OPEC agreed to cut production by 1.2mb/d, along with 600kb/d from non-OPEC producers. Francisco believes Saudi’s key objective will be to push the oil forward curve into backwardation to 1)lower global refinery margins 2) lower prices for forward sellers and prevent capex spending 3) reduce downside oil price risks. Francisco believes it is in OPEC’s best interest to comply with the stated cuts, and thinks Saudi remains under significant pressure to either achieve higher oil prices, or inevitably de-peg the Riyal.\n\n2 - Oil fundamentals - OPEC’s cut has significant implications for supply/demand balances and throws the global market into a meaningful deficit for 2017. We estimate the global market will be in a 560kb/d deficit throughout 2017. US Shale output remains a headwind for a rebound in global balances and will vary with price. Given our $59/bbl 2017 outlook for WTI, Francisco believes shale will reverse its current trend before rebounding sequentially by 660kb/d between 2Q17 and 4Q17.\n\n3 - US Energy Policy / Trump Administration — Francisco views the likelihood for Trump’s administration to implement a border adjustment tax to be extremely low, but recognizes that if a tax was imposed, it would have profound implications for EM demand and the WTI/Br arb. The appointment of key cabinet members Rex Tillerson, Rick Perry, and Scott Pruitt pose significant implications for the US energy sector.\n\n4 - Commodity Macro — Forward inflation expectations around the world have jumped sharply since Trump’s victory. So far, rising inflation and steeper yield curves have neutralized the strong dollar, pushing commodities higher. We believe the recent breakdown in USD/Oil correlation since OPEC/Fed can persist so long as inflation expectations remain supported. However, a toxic mix of much faster-than-anticipated US interest rate hikes, a much stronger USD, and a trade war with China pose risks."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032880.txt_24195
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032880.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yikes"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2016, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 15 July 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "That's a broad question."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "7/15/2016 1:58:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I no longer use terms like \"broad\" :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.txt_24200
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.\n\nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance\nfrom FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting\ntime of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted\non our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.\n\nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data\nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I\nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or\nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is\nexpensive and the start up is running out of money.\n\nIam going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\n\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 11 Nov 2016 at 10:29 am", "subject": "Re:", "body": "New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 6:34:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just checked report again. NY is correct. We only got WI wrong.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030617.txt_24208
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030617.txt
subject: Camp Hits Carried Interest in Tax Plan With Wall Street in Focus
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "2/26/2014 5:08:53 PM", "subject": "Camp Hits Carried Interest in Tax Plan With Wall Street in Focus", "body": "Camp Hits Carried Interest in Tax Plan With Wall Street in Focus\nPosted February 25, 2014, 10:29 P.M. ET\n\nThe top Republican tax writer in Congress will lean on the financial industry with his planned revamp of the U.S. code,\nchanging the treatment of carried interest and imposing a levy on the assets of banks and insurers.\n\nHouse Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) is to unveil the proposed tax code changes Feb.\n26 that also include revisions that affect how investment fund managers’ compensation is taxed. He offered a preview\ntonight using rhetoric that in part echoes President Barack Obama's own calls to change tax laws.\n\nDo ee ee oe ee ee ee ee i i ee ie"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033208.txt_24221
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033208.txt
subject: re: Palantir
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2016 3:09:19 PM", "subject": "re: Palantir", "body": "not sure your thoughts on Palantir but if remotely positive then david access to shares seems like a 50% discount to market\nplease advise\nthank you\nhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-26/palantir-mulls-ipo-and-expects-to-be-profitable-next-year\nhttp://fortune.com/2016/10/26/palantir-ceo-ipo/"}, {"sender": "David Fiszel", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 16, 2016 at 9:47:07 AM EST", "subject": "re: Palantir", "body": "Can you see if we can get an update on palantir view. I heard the meeting with Trump was Huge for the company and I can buy more at $5 which is $9.5B valuation. Seems like a home run"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016218.txt_24225
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016218.txt
subject: AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 1:51:01 AM", "subject": "AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/08/att-confirms-it-paid-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-insights-on-administration.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt_24230
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt
subject: RE: Oscar diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephanie", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal 2<Vacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2011 11:15:40 PM", "subject": "RE: Oscar diary", "body": "Jeffrey,\nPeggy's story is attached to the e-mail. I have included the story in the body of the e-mail as well.\nThanks,\n\nStephanie\n\nOmar Quadhafi is hunkering down in Tripoli giving press interviews denying that rebels are taking over\nEastern Libya. Oi] prices are shooting over one hundred dollars a barrel. The US government is on the\nverge of a shut down. These are not the top secret opening lines to Aaron Sorkin’s new script, but the\nglobal headlines of a world spinning out of control. I head to Los Angeles like an overdressed lemming to\nattend the 83rd Academy Awards and attempt to make sense of artists thrust into combat.\n\nFor the second year nearly 6,000 Academy members have nominated 10 films and the battle is down to two.\nThe beloved timeless classic, \"The King's Speech\" marches into the arena as the front runner, but\npassionate supporters of the brilliant edgier (and critics darling) \"The Social Network\" have not\nconceded. The ballots are counted, the party invites are out and still the feelings are raw. Filmmakers\nare exhausted from campaigning.\n\nAt Bryan Lourd's famous star studded party Sony Classics’ Co-President Michael Barker announces to me he\nhas taken a random sampling of voters in the room. He says, \"There will be a ‘Social Network’ upset at\nthe Kodak Theater.\" Shear panic radiates from my every pore as he says, \"I am joking.\" It's like color\nwar at summer camp.\n\nwoody Allen and George Lucas tell me they are no longer members of the Academy because pitting artists\nagainst each other to determine the quality of their work is insane. They are right.\n\nMy event and publicity company is considered \"Switzerland\" by the studios, as we help every filmmaker to\npresent and position his work. This year I am somewhat emotionally sucked in.\n\nIn 2005 I meet the unknown 32-year-old English director Tom Hooper on his first film for HBO,\"Elizabeth\nI\". The Emmy award winning movie stars Helen Mirren, who takes credit for discovering him directing\nEnglish television. Helen later wins her Oscar for portraying Queen Elizabeth in “The Queen”. Queen\nElizabeth is the daughter of King George VI portrayed by Oscar winner Colin Firth in “The King's Speech\".\n\nI also become Hooper's champion encouraging many to see his early work including his herculean 10 hour\nHBO mini-series \"John Adams\" produced by Tom Hanks.\n\nSix years later at the Telluride Film Festival Tom Hooper is bathing in the glory of a hysterical\nstanding ovation with Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush at the very first screening of \"The King's Speech.”\nSurprisingly, this drama's subtle humor gets big laughs leading up to its emotional ending.\n\nwithin two weeks, at The Toronto Film Festival, Harvey Weinstein is now standing with his filmmakers\nwitnessing the same reaction. The film wins The Audience Prize. Their strategy is to say nothing. Do\nnothing. They have a possible Oscar winner. Four out of five past Best Pictures have premiered in\nToronto.\n\ncut to New York City at the end of September. It's the opening night at The Film Society of Lincoln\ncenter. One of America’s most important and prolific producers Scott Rudin, along with Jesse Eisenberg,\nAndrew Garfield and Aaron Sorkin are in a brightly lit box waving down to their equally hysterical\naudience who have just seen \"The Social Network\".\n\nThe film opens the next day to rave reviews and endless publicity. David Fincher is off making “The Girl\nwith the Dragon Tattoo\". Aaron Sorkin becomes the face of the film and an immediate shoo-in for an Oscar.\n\nThe Hamptons International Film Festival in October suddenly becomes a launching pad for \"127 Hours\",\nwhere cool Yale/NYU student James Franco appears and receives a heroic standing ovation. More Oscar buzz.\n\n“Black Swan\" also unspools there in a tiny theater as Madonna, Alec Baldwin and even Harvey Weinstein\n\nslip in the back. Darren Aronofsky, sporting the ever present cool wool scarf around his neck is hailed a\ngenius. Natalie Portman is instantly the hot nominee for Best Actress."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt_24236
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt
subject: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Saturday, August 11, 2018 12:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Hello Martin, \nThank you for getting back to me. We would be looking for on record comments or a \"no comment\" to our \nquestions. But I am certainly happy to have an off record conversation with yourself as well. Perhaps we \ncould set up a time to chat briefly off record on Monday before I send you our questions for Mr Epstein? \nKind regards, \nMatt"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["Matt Williams"], "timestamp": "On 11 August 2018 at 11:08", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Mr Williams, I am in receipt of your emails to Jackie Percyzk. If you first agree that any communications between you \nand me are off the record, I would be agreeable to receiving your questions or a clip of the episode that relates to Mr \nEpstein. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["Matt Williams"], "timestamp": "On 13 August 2018 at 14:52", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "If you still want, send the questions. I would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my \noption to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty, \nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on \nafter reviewing. Kind regards - Matt"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "8/13/2018 7:30:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030603.txt_24237
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030603.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Also nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032857.txt_24247
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032857.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/16/2016 10:08:48 AM", "subject": null, "body": "vs jeffrey trump. its awful, I wish your side won."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026442.txt_24252
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026442.txt
subject: Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Parker, Ashley <ashley.parker@washpost.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with\nsenior White House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course\nsee if you want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the\nrecord, just in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm at , or my desk\nis\n\nThanks,\nAshley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "do you want it? or jared?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:28 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Do I have the choice? And if so, your view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 9:52:23 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "we should talk"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt_24255
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt
subject: Re: Filing in Epstein case
messages:
  [{"sender": "Josh Gerstein", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "December 31, 2014 at 1:03:19 PM EST", "subject": "Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Hi Prof. Dershowitz:\n\nI've been following the Jeffrey Epstein litigation saga on and off for some time.\n\nWhen I checked the federal court docket last night, I came across the attached filing. It makes some serious allegations about you and several other people related to the case.\n\nI wanted to make sure you had a copy of the filing and to ask if you have any comments on the allegations raised in it.\n\nI'm planning to write a blog entry or story on this and will probably do so fairly soon since the filing is a public record at this point.\n\nAnyway, if you want to respond, please let me know as soon as possible.\n\nThanks\n\n--Josh Gerstein\n\nReporter\nPOLITICO"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2014, at 1:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2014, at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2014 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2014 at 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Martin G Weinberg"], "timestamp": "12/31/2014 11:43:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt_24266
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 10:18:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "have fun"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "prostittion isastate crime. never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting.! in Florida first offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get pre trial diversion. no criminal record... there isa felony solication for the THIRD offense.. A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count of felony solitciation . because there were many girls. . mandatory diversion. sentence. .!!!!. a grand jury\n\n. ususally only for capital murder cases. . Recarey and Reiter ( police chief ). pulled my garbage for months, and surveilled the house . letting all the gilrs come and go?! called inthe FBI. they did not like the grand jury result. and released to the press, the raw sewage of police interviews , ie, no girl was cross examined EVER. . Unheardof. . - the girls retunred the house multiplie times. for 200 dollars for a rub and\n\ntug. . no sex. . some worked in the locak massage parlors. most in thier mid twenties.. There is only press stories told my strippers of me buying my girlfiedn from slovakia from her parents . girls under\n\n15. . all made up to get press.._ FBI / puts a task force together title \" operation leap year \" to investigate my personal massage activity?! nuts. interviews my chiropractor? medical info. . etc.\n\nHE orked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that period. The testimony of the houseman John allessi confiremed it. He never got a massage. abe gosman a friend of mine . ran into financial difficulty with assited living homes. . His home was listed at 45 million dollars. with no takers for months on end . He and J agreed a price of 30m. ( His wife | | . ends up going to jail for lying to the bankrupty trustee about her jewelry. ) this is in the summer of 04.. I became the stalking horse bidder at 36 m. ie if someone bid higher I would receive a fee. trump buys the house at the telephone auction. only me trump andd his friend pulty the developer. He quickly puts it on the market for 125 million. serves the purpose of a justification for a high sale later\n\n. and no one will touch it. it is is bough in the name of trump properties Ilc.. no idea who owns it. or what else it\" owns \". Three years later 08 he sells it to Ryboloolev for approx 100 million. He should have had a 50 million plus capital gain. he tells people and press he spent 20-30 m to fix up. that would justifiy a reduction in captial gains. key question how did he report the sale , if he did at all on his 08 tax return. He has no money. when he buys the house. His biz model is putting his name on a real estate development and gets a fee for using his name. The hotel biz is just that. someone else buys the hotel. hoping to make a profit from its operation and eventual sale. Trump put his name on it , and get a 2 % fee and maybe a piece of the profit if any on sale. He touts the project as\" his\" .... just as in his current financial statements on file as president he lists his\" income\" as the GROSS receipts of the clubs. with no expenses deducted. not his personal revenue. ie the doral golf club loses money every year. it pays out more than it takes in , but he lists the revenue as his income. AMAZING."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029017.txt_24272
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029017.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did she also drop civil case against you ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Good\nSee you this Sat 230 PM ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:30:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thanks"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029096.txt_24273
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when i told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought 1 was being cynical, as he was sure\nthat doing good was going to be the goal\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediald=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal &contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F05%2F31%2Fus%2Fobama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ":-)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did you talk to reid about the donor advised fund?\n\nts."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not yet. I will when I talk to him next - but not sure when that is.\n\nBTW, should be expecting funding yet or after we figure out the pitch?\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ineed to edit and hand. sorry, 1 will try to get to it this weekend. soo swamped here. its so much fun."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:37:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks\n(Tip: Use NRR to mean No Reply Required - thank you!)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026324.txt_24274
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026324.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\n\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "Le 20 sept. 2018 a 12:01", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i was offline for yom kippur . can you put me in direct contact.? happy holiday"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/24/2018 2:43:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dear Jeffery,\n\nThe best solution is to put you in contact with Philippe Castro who works on the film with Serge Moati and who\nspeaks english.\n\nSerge Moati doesn't speak english.\n\nHere are the contacts from Philippe\n\nWithe my friendship,\n\nJack"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029003.txt_24279
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029003.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a bad movie, president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra, again, sunday, I know you moved krause to tonight.."}, {"sender": "<______________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": "Soon-Yi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 12:04:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025639.txt_24285
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025639.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\nLawrence\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of \"American exceptionalism\" or \"Israeli self-defense\" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a \"transcendental purpose,\" and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn't matter because the facts are just \"abuse of history\" while real history is \"the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,\" then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist., his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "or we can visit him on his"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 7:02:55 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "will bring up that possibility. :)\nso glad we are aging to see you down there.. working hard now after a week of traveling with Johnny and late nights, to finish my new book so I can actually celebrate that as planned on the trip."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031284.txt_24288
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031284.txt
subject:
  JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven J. Hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["dkiesq@aol.com"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033585.txt_24297
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033585.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 12, 2016, at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/295423-bill-clintons-cia-chief-joins-trump-campaign"}, {"sender": "soon yi previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 11:04:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Woody said it doesn't mean anything."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016595.txt_24300
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016595.txt
subject: Re: ARCOM
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirk Blouin", "recipients": ["John Page", "Police Code Enforcement"], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ARCOM", "body": "JP,\nHere is a copy of the minutes from the April CEB hearing. Each month thereafter the case was postponed\nbecause we were aware that it was being brought to ARCOM. Now that this matter has been resolved\nwith ARCOM we will proceed with a code enforcement case until the property is in compliance (meaning\nthey plant the shrubbery and hedges approved by the Town).\nSgt. Krauel or Rob Walton will be available on July 23rd as I will be attending a conference.\nH. Case # 08-2484, 515 N. County Road, Trump Properties, LLC"}, {"sender": "John Page/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Kirk Blouin/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "06/26/2008 09:00 AM", "subject": "ARCOM", "body": "Kirk: We had our June monthly ARCOM meeting yesterday. You likely know that ARCOM is working\nwith Mr. Trump to re-install a hedge on his North County Road property. I believe this case is now\npending in front of Code Enforcement. In May, ARCOM approved a plan to replace the former hedge\nwith silver buttonwood shrubbery, which would additionally be back-planted with silver buttonwood\ntrees....the overall effect would be an eventual 20' high screen. The shrubs have been planted, but\nyesterday attorney Ray Royce asked for postponing the trees until the end of the Hurricane season.\nARCOM said NO and directed the attorney and landscaper to get the trees in ASAP. Also, more\nshrubbery was required at the main entry (north side) to match the newly installed hedge on the south\nside.\nAs the meeting was ending, the Commissioners asked for one of two things. They asked that either 1) a\nquick written report from Code Enforcement be made available to them at their next meeting on July 23\n(9:00 a.m.) about the enforcement status of the case, or 2) that someone from Code Enforcement attend\ntheir meeting to provide a verbal status report. Their patience is wearing thin with the whole hedge issue,\nand it has them naturally curious about what is happening with their counterparts on Code Enforcement.\nWould you or the appropriate representative from Code Enforcement be available on July 23? That\nwould be my preference because follow-up questions almost always pop up. If not, can you provide me\nwith a brief summary of your enforcement history and pending status? Thanks, JP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029914.txt_24310
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029914.txt
subject: This is business develpt to diagnose illness
messages:
  [{"sender": "PETER MANDELSON", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/22/2011 3:00:54 PM", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Greenberg", "recipients": ["Ben", "Lord Mandelson"], "timestamp": "16 November 2010 18:34", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": "My late reply does no justice to my enthusiasm to follow up on our previous call and to your interest in the same. Apologies.\n\nA word of explanation about the past two weeks:\n= Financing:\nAm in the midst of a $8-10 mn financing\nIn past two weeks have met potential investors in Toronto, Vancouver, DC, NYC, and Boston.\nHave in this time already closed approximately $2 mn, which is encouraging\nThis pace will continue for another month or so until the financing is fully closed.\n= US DoD:\n\nLast week several of us took our prototype device to be demonstrated for the US military's Walter Reed Army Institute of\nResearch (WRAIR).\n\nAt the conclusion of a four-hour session our host, Colonel Colin Ohrt, MD, who is in charge of the relevant WRAIR program,\ncalled our device a game-changer. He would like to pilot our device in Tanzania, Cambodia, Kenya, and Thailand. Follow up is\nbeing arranged.\n\nColonel Ohrt also separately evaluated our white paper on malaria elimination and expressed strong interest in also pursuing this\nproject with Fio.\n\nAccompanying Fio for these meetings was General Richard Tubb, MD (retired last year from the US Air Force). Dick was Chief\nof the White House Medical Unit and physician to Presidents Clinton and Bush.\n\n=» USAID\n\nAlso last week we successfully demonstrated our device for USAID and the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI). Follow up is\nbeing arranged.\n\nAccompanying Fio for these meetings was Andrew Natsios, former head of USAID.\nFor all the foregoing meetings our prototype device performed well. Exciting times.\n\nMy trip to London has yet to be arranged and is dependent on financing events. In the meantime, I will happily travel to meet you\nin NYC.\n\nAttached is the White Paper on Malaria Elimination which Fio had written and invited several academic partners to join. Since the\ntime the document was first drafted, we discovered an even simpler technical strategy based on our new prototype device and\nreinforced by our recent discussion with WRAIR. This simplification would result in field trials as early as next year, which is\nmuch sooner than in the attached White Paper. To accomplish this we would team up with WRAIR rather than some of the current\nacademic partners in the paper.\n\nBest regards and wishes,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031102.txt_24315
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031102.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kate"], "timestamp": "8/5/2009 12:59:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i saw it. where are you?"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did you see whos plane Clinton went on to north korea...bing"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032509.txt_24333
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032509.txt
subject: Re: Masa
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:34:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "OK. Let me see what I can do. What is the latest from the inner circle?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "great , thanks, or new york , or this weekend as donald arrives at 5pm tonight"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Linon (iii iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event.\nI know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not\nopposed."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he\nshould know.\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-\nthe-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-\nheading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029981.txt_24345
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029981.txt
subject: Re: Studio
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2013 12:54:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "Barak Obama?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paula"], "timestamp": "Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:41:30 +0100", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "come afterward, i have interesting people. ehud barak, mandelson, zucekrman"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "Hi! Last night we confirmed a studio recording with an stunning soprano to record a new aria Fred wrote. Its early 7:30-9pm on April 4. F really wants to see you, so is after that too late? Wanna join us somewhere to eat after? Wanna come to the studio? Fred will be playing the piano for the demo. Otherwise, we could have a visit anytime you want after the 4th. But if you can, the studio would be fun and I would love to have your input in the booth:). Tora and Miasha might come too. Its an awesome aria sung by a Vampiress who looks just like (better) Vanessa Williams from our day. ( The Miss USA that somehow had some haha nudie photos floating around). ANYWAY. .what do ya think?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025163.txt_24357
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025163.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "im in wed, fri. edelman?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:47:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033171.txt_24361
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033171.txt
subject: Update on US Elections
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/27/2016 9:46:03 PM", "subject": "Update on US Elections", "body": "We have processed 943,338 tweets since the start of the presidential debate till now.\n\nClinton's popularity has increased dramatically since the debate. According to our recent data, 62% support\nClinton and 38% Trump.\n\nClinton is now more popular in New York, California and Michigan. She is likely to win in these states with\nhuge margins. Clinton has also gained popularity in Texas (Clinton 65% - Trump 35%).\n\nTrump has huge support in Ohio (90% Trump - 10% Clinton) and in New Jersey.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Update on US Elections", "body": "Sure. Let me know your availability.\n\nRegards,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 11:09 PM", "subject": "Update on US Elections", "body": "Skype this week?"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 25 September 2016", "subject": "Update on US Elections", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\nPlease find attached InsightsPod business plan for your consideration.\n\nSince Twitter is live streaming the presidential debates, the social media activity will accelerate and it will help\nus in making better predictions of outcome. It was apparent from the US Election report, which I sent you\npreviously that we need a Data Scientist who can translate our data into better insights. Taking this into\naccount I hope you can help us by backing this venture.\n\nThanks,\nZubair"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023285.txt_24367
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023285.txt
subject: draft
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella", "Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:08 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million , ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for restructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price. for both, lets say approx $8-15m ._ leaving loss of between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28% obama. tax 3.8% . city and state 12% total aprox43 %. tax rate. savings 38.7-44m"}, {"sender": "Brice", "recipients": ["me", "Richard", "Karen"], "timestamp": "0:51 PM (15 hours ago)", "subject": "draft", "body": "Good afternoon\n\nRemoval of headers in Cabana’s | and 2 started today\n\nDock Shelters proposed start date 16 Apr\n\nLSJ staff cottage and Sams kitchen and bath cabinets are due in this week.\nHave yet to schedule install.\n\nWill have estimate for GSJ Staff Cottage from EB by the end of the week\nUnable to contact Jimmy again regarding thIs project, Reached our Monday to schedule site meeting, got\na - No Can Do -\n\nreply !!!\n\nRegards Brice"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:37 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "gain at 20 % not 28. . so total , 35.8%. taxrate. same for boat. and plane each around 10m so total 7 m savings if both sold"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Heather Gray"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "heather leon seems to not recall the issue of finding an alternative to the eschange agents resale cerificate. he didnt remeebr you suggesting a gallery instead. you mentioned that he did not want to get another gallery involved.? has any of the transactions been audited using this method , which even i find agressive."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nAs you will recall, we used this same exchange agent last year on the Calder 1031. At the time, we discussed the merits of using a gallery versus a commercial exchange agent and my recommendation to Leon was to use a gallery. | felt that there were advantages to using a commercial exchange agent instead of a gallery on the 1031 side (e.g., less likelihood of a breach of confidentiality, IRS familiarity with CDEC in the event of an audit, security of"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030787.txt_24375
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030787.txt
subject:
  Re: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-so-desperate-hes-talking-steve-bannon-amid-multiple-investigations-912040

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-so-desperate-hes-talking-steve-bannon-amid-multiple-investigations-912040", "body": "nyt says trump talking directly to steve"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-so-desperate-hes-talking-steve-bannon-amid-multiple-investigations-912040", "body": "I can't get to Boston tomorrow—but thanks for inviting. Where in NYT did you see this—can't find."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 11:34:36 PM", "subject": "Re: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-so-desperate-hes-talking-steve-bannon-amid-multiple-investigations-912040", "body": "http://www.newsweek.com/trump-so-desperate-hes-talking-steve-bannon-amid-multiple-investigations-912040"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022825.txt_24385
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022825.txt
subject: Re: off the record
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon i"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. MEE the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [77> wrote]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose?\n\nBut you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV....\nCall me any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon i"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:20:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033398.txt_24388
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033398.txt
subject: Re: Chat? #?
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 4:21:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Chat? #?", "body": "https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrismcedaniel/trump-employee-said-he-knew-of-misconduct-at-the-"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Chat? #?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022831.txt_24392
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022831.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mee the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\nthere, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday\nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs,\ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated\nback here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line,\nand unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record,\nthey might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources\nare public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk\ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 10, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now good?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Need 15"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 5:58:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "free now"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019467.txt_24396
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019467.txt
subject: Bill Clinton pictured with Jeffrey Epstein's social fixer at Chelsea's wedding I Daily Mail Online
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/14/2015 11:43:26 PM", "subject": "Bill Clinton pictured with Jeffrey Epstein's social fixer at Chelsea's wedding I Daily Mail Online", "body": "Attachments: WebPage.pdf; Untitled attachment 272040.htm\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2906981/Bill-Clinton-pictured-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-social-fixer-Chelsea-s-wedding.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028862.txt_24398
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028862.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 7:02:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033022.txt_24404
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033022.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 8:52:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he wants to be needed."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030793.txt_24405
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030793.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 114 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 10:42:07 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re: 'You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,' Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President's Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-mayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023291.txt_24406
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023291.txt
subject: Detailed constructive list.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:37 PM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "gain at 20 % not 28. . so total , 35.8%. tax rate. same for boat. and plane each around 10m so total 7m savings if both sold"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! .overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 art space. .6 regan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rentsale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16. new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and children ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and dislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints . 21. bank loans . rates ? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review and reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside consultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex films . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Detailed constructive list.", "body": "please print two copes . re formattted so leon can go line by line ie . headings question, gift answer. blank whoresponsible. timeframe. fee paid when?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022397.txt_24407
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022397.txt
subject: Fwd: Wednesday's Headlines: Labor pick cut deal with billionaire accused of haying sex with minors
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 2:35:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Wednesday's Headlines: Labor pick cut deal with billionaire accused of haying sex with minors", "body": "JEFFREY—\nAS A FRIEND I'M SAYING MY ATHEIST PRAYERS FOR YOU. \nDON'T LET THE BASTARDS FRAME YOU. \n—PAUL"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt_24411
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 10:21:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They're huge!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 6:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great photos"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, 10 October 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Either one I guess. Just came back from Ireland where I have a show called \"Torture.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 4:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no good choice. how are u"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI was prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I'm so disgusted by the outrage over \"grab \nthem by the pussy\" that I may give him my sympathy vote. \nI'm sure Bill C said things, too. \nAndres"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032904.txt_24418
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032904.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas J, .2ndr i"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando ri", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas J, .2ndr i"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:58:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt_24424
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt
subject: Re: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty,\n\nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on\na after reviewing. Kind regards - Matt\n\nA former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr\nEpstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?\n\nOn one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched “young girls try on bikinis” while\nmaking comments on the their bodies.” Does Mr Epstein have any comment?\n\nHow does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as “sex slaves” at his\nproperties?\n\nA former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on\nnumerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?\n\nDid or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 13, 2018, at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/14/2018 2:09:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028613.txt_24428
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028613.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. ima cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt_24433
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 4:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "did you enjoy sultan?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "btw. michael wolff is doing a trump book. spent 45 minutes on the phone with him over the weekend he asked if he could ask you some off the record questions re policy procedures, noramlly followed etc."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:28:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, of course."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt_24439
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 12:29:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No. what happened? R u about to be dragged in?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump roles out clintons four accusers. recall our dinner?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029519.txt_24440
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029519.txt
subject:
  Noam Chomsky Calls Dem Focus on Russia a 'Huge Gift' to Trump: 'They May Have Handed Him the Next Election’

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2019 10:49:45 AM", "subject": "Noam Chomsky Calls Dem Focus on Russia a 'Huge Gift' to Trump: 'They May Have Handed Him the Next Election’", "body": "https://ww.mediaite.com/trump/noam-chomsky-cal1s-dem-focus-on-russia-a-huge-gi ft-to-trump-they-may-have-handed-him-the-next-election/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt_24444
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt_24447
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt
subject: Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Quora Digest [digest-noreply@quora.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2019 9:34:40 AM", "subject": "Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\n\nTOP STORIES FOR YOU\n\nDo French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?\n\nHendrik Vanger, studied at Pompeu Fabra University\n\nI am not French, I am Spanish, so my answer will be about my own impression of France,\nhaving been in the country several times and knowing some French people.\n\nCulturally, t...\n\nRead More »\n\nMy dad is a US citizen and I'm currently on F1 visa. Can he file for me while\nI'm in the US?\n\nEee\n\nKathryn Berck, Retired US consular(visa) officer, INTJ,CASA,writer,dog saver"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032910.txt_24449
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032910.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any new york plans"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr (TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your\n\ncall. otherwise new york dec.6-9?  \\\n\ninteresting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-\nclaimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-\nstory.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031079.txt_24451
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031079.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from\n\nok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here..\nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution\n\nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:55:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "noiam in paris thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023246.txt_24466
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023246.txt
subject: tight schedule lets try a set time to speak
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in your collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. I understand your desire to modifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show you, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I vigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work .. you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a reaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint over it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\n\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me ,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea . Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I guess you wanted to save money. ?\n\nThe audit has brought to the fore the lack of your office quality that 1 have been violently squawking about. ie. children playing with works of art. . It is inconceivable to me that John castrucct is still there , Joslin part time, but relied on . joe error prone and brad a corporate bandleader talking about the office's finance team, accounting dept, and directing wendy to do things that are clearly not in your interest. ( saving money again?) its nuts!! . a still non-existent IT dept. impossible , it was the first thing on my list of things that were needed to be done. Still no trading accounts to speak of , though its prophylactic quality has been discussed over and over during the past three years . computers do not read Page Six. the women atthe IRS do.! you said your motivation in keeping this group of part timers"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt_24473
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by firms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\nOf gross ignorance surely\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "On May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship as a source, . thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM -0400", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "prospectus"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "Lisa biz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 7:46:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt_24478
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young \ngirl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\" \nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you \nwere so kind to make it happen."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:56:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031328.txt_24482
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031328.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 11:27:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Somewhere"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Wed May 18 06:37:36 2011", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032737.txt_24493
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032737.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:10:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031086.txt_24494
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031086.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:35:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033429.txt_24498
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033429.txt
subject: Re: Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 19, 2019, at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695954246/trump-officials-tried-to-rush-nuclear-technology-to-saudis-house-panel-finds?ft=nprml&f=1001"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribs Ii", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 8:25:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Saw it"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt_24503
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt
subject: Re: From Politico Magazine
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "12/12/2016 7:52:15 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "talk to danny hillis he had some legisative ideas"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "Any ideas?"}, {"sender": "Margaret Slattery <a>", "recipients": ["ET ies"], "timestamp": "November 28, 2016 at 3:04:51 PM CST", "subject": "From Politico Magazine", "body": "Dear Joi,\n\nHello, I’m writing from Politico Magazine, where we’re working on a special package of stories timed to Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, and I wondered if you would be interested in contributing.\n\nAs he prepares to take office, our plan is to publish a handful of out-of-the box ideas for President Trump, suggested by writers and thinkers from a variety of fields and ideological positions. Whether the idea has to do with politics, policy, personnel or governing style, we’re looking for suggestions that are specific and, above all, surprising; something inventive if slightly far-fetched is better than a pet cause or a well-trod policy proposal. (This exercise doesn’t require that you support or even agree with Trump, but it does require a willingness to engage.)\n\nDo you have an idea along these lines that you wish the new president would consider, whether something in economics or otherwise? If so, I’d love to hear, and we can discuss next steps from there. Ultimately, we’re aiming to publish a handful of short pieces (about 800 words each) as a package of proposals.\n\nMany thanks, and please let me know if you have questions.\n\nMargy Slattery\n\nDeputy Editor, Politico Magazine"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt_24509
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. Ikid younot. their view. how else ,could one explain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\n\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population....\n\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\n\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <ns", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:46:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Lot of ruin in a nation"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033401.txt_24511
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033401.txt
subject: Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["nicholas.ribis in"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 8:24:07 PM", "subject": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695954246/trump-officials-tried-to-rush-nuclear-technology-to-saudis-house-panel-finds?ft=nprml&f=1001"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt_24512
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen <markcohen@example.com>", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted allegation]\n2. [redacted allegation]\n3. [redacted allegation]\n4. [redacted allegation]\n5. [redacted allegation]\n6. [redacted allegation]\n7. [redacted allegation]\n8. [redacted allegation]\n9. [redacted allegation]\n10. [redacted allegation]\n11. [redacted allegation]\n12. [redacted allegation]\n13. [redacted allegation]\n14. [redacted allegation]"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <gmax@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt_24514
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt
subject: RE: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "Im not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. you took a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you set a target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, no discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike, is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would.. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "Jeffrey\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts.\nHowever I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry.\nPaul"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "lye had enough!!!! Which puts ???"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:13:06 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031466.txt_24518
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031466.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/16/2016 2:52:57 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "I am kind of shocked that our reporters did not contact you re the Trump/women story. Seems to me he got off rather lightly. How are you doing?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt_24524
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt
subject: Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners
messages:
  [{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!\n\nSidney Hillman Foundation Names Winners of 2019 Prizes for Journalism in Service of the Common Good\n\nReuters, NBC News and MSNBC, ProPublica Receive Honors; Adam Serwer to receive Opinion & Analysis Prize\n\nNEW YORK — The Sidney Hillman Foundation announced Tuesday winners of the 69th annual Hillman Prizes, recognizing a Reuters expose of slum-like living conditions on U.S military bases, the Miami Herald's investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's sweetheart deal with serial sex abuser, Jeffrey Epstein, and NBC News and MSNBC's reporting on the Trump Administration's family separation policy, among other standout reporting in service of the common good.\n\nHannah Dreier of ProPublica won a Hillman Prize for reporting that showed how the government's bungled crackdown on MS-13 has torn apart the lives of Latino immigrants. The Atlantic's Adam Serwer, who has emerged as a defining voice of the Trump era, won for his essays on racism and Trump's political movement, and Anna Clark won for her book on the Flint water crisis.\n\nThis year's prizes were judged by writer Ta-Nehisi Coates, the New Yorker's Jelani Cobb, Reuters' Al Freedman, the New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg, the American Prospect's Harold Meyerson and The Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel.\n\nThe 2019 winners of the Hillman Prizes are:\n• Newspaper — Miami Herald, Julie K. Brown and Emily Michot: Perversion of Justice\n• Magazine — ProPublica with New York magazine, Newsday, This American Life, New York Times Magazine, Hannah Dreier: Trapped in Gangland\n• Web — Reuters, Joshua Schneyer, Michael Pell, Andrea Januta, Deborah Nelson: Ambushed at Home\n• Broadcast — NBC News and MSNBC, Jacob Soboroff and Julia Ainsley: Torn Apart: Crisis at the Border\n• Opinion & Analysis — Adam Serwer, The Atlantic\n• Book — Anna Clark: The Poisoned City: Flint's Water and the American Urban Tragedy, Metropolitan Books\n\nReporting by this year's prize winners has had significant positive impact, including:\n• Reversal of the Trump administration's \"Zero Tolerance\" family separation policy\n• Three federal investigations, new legislation, widespread repairs, and a $386 million emergency program to inspect military housing for hazards\n• The exposure of pervasive bias and negligence by Long Island police, leading to federal and local investigations and reforms\n\nThis year's honorees follow in the trailblazing tradition of past winners ranging from Murray Kempton in 1950 for his articles on labor in the south and Edward R. Murrow in 1954 for his critical reports on civil liberties and Joseph McCarthy at the height of the Red Scare; to 2017 newspaper winner, David Fahrenthold, for exposing Donald Trump's sexual harassment and mismanagement of his foundation.\n\nThe Hillman Prizes are open to journalists and subjects globally for any work widely accessible to a U.S. audience. Winners will be awarded a $5,000 prize at the Hillman Foundation's annual ceremony in New York City on May 7.\n\n\"In a time when this country's highest powers have taken it as their business to demean the work of journalists, it is particularly significant for us to honor those who have taken up the tools of journalism to challenge corrupt power wherever it may reside,\" said Hillman judge Ta-Nehisi Coates.\n\nIn 2011, the Sidney Hillman Foundation inaugurated the Canadian Hillman Prize. This year's winners, Harvey Cashore, Bob McKeown and Kimberly Ivany of CBC's The Fifth Estate, won for their sweeping investigation into the research and regulatory failures that have put millions of children at risk on their way to and from school each day. Their reporting exposed fraudulent science behind Transport Canada's seminal seatbelt study and led the Transport Minister to form a task force with the provinces to look at implementing seatbelts on school buses across the country.\n\nThe Hillman Foundation announced Monday that CUNY professor and historian, Joshua B. Freeman, is the recipient of its 2019 Sol Stetin Award for Labor History. Freeman has written extensively about the history of labor, industry, modern America, and New York City. The Hillman Foundation established the award in 2005 to honor a labor historian who has made significant contribution to the field, researching and telling the stories of working peoples' lives.\n\nSince 1950, the Hillman's Prizes for Journalism honor the legacy of Sidney Hillman, an immigrant who dedicated his life to a \"better America.\" Hillman believed that a free press was essential to a fair and equal society. The Sidney Hillman Foundation has sought to carry on his legacy by honoring journalists who illuminate the great issues of our times—from the search for a basis for lasting peace, to the need for better housing, medical care, and employment security for all people, to the promotion of civil liberties and the battle against discrimination based on race, nationality, or religion.\n\nFor more information, including to RSVP to the event, please contact Alexandra Lescaze at 646-448-6413 or Alex@HillmanFoundation.org"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz [1.1.11.110....ii]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 12:58:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt_24527
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["BillGates", "Larry Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19 2015 09:48 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I guess I won't be able to run for office for a while. the forbes 400 list is now over 3 trillion in wealth that will be transfered. obama will try to void the step -up , it won't pass this time, but more of an impetus for some, (though hardly needed)."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt_24545
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "9/3/2009 11:18:47 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "she is your second biggest fan... iam the first. i sell dubai, to its detractors."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "An interesting piece to read before you start your weekend. Guest Post by Jim Krane: Dubai, Not Obama, is the Mideast's Best Peace Hope Tuesday, Sep 01 2009, 3:11PMThis is a guest note by Jim Krane, a former AP Persian Gulf correspondent. His new book on Dubai, City of Gold: Dubai and the Dream of Capitalism, is available. As Americans, Israelis and Palestinians continue their endless peace-jockeying, a more hopeful solution has emerged. It is a fresh Arab initiative that depends neither on America nor Israel. It is Dubai. Dubai, you must know, is the flashy Gulf city-state that is one of the seven United Arab Emirates. In my book, I argue that Dubaians, descended from illiterate Bedouin who faced starvation in the 1940s, have authored the most exciting Arab accomplishment in 700 years. >From nowhere, Dubai has mushroomed into a trading city-state on the lines of Hong Kong and Singapore, with sidelines in real estate and tourism. Dubai accomplished all this without (much) oil, and without the help - or even recognition of the United States. While Washington has been caught up prolonging the Israel-Palestinian conflict and starting a war in Iraq, Dubai was erecting one of the worlds most spectacular cities. So, how can Dubai fix the Middle East? It certainly can't do much to help Palestinians suffering under Israeli misrule. But that is the point. Dubai has succeeded in spite of the plight of the Palestinians, and in spite of what Arab leaders describe as US meddling that stymies their development. One of the favorite themes of Dubai leader Sheikh Mohammed is that his counterparts should stop bloviating about the Israelis and start serving the interests of their own citizens. Dubai's wild growth backs up Sheikh Mohammed's message. His business-before-politics way is becoming a development model for the rest of the Arab world. But wait, Dubai is in financial trouble. How could it be a role model?Dubai's downturn is temporary. Being one of the worlds most globalized cities, it couldn't help but be infected by a global recession. The contagion kneecapped each one of its economic pillars: Shipping, logistics, tourism, and its binging real estate sector. Most of these pillars remain sound. Dubai's economic example isn't widely understood in Washington. But its a good thing. Emulating Dubai could make Arab countries more stable and secure, along with the rest of us. For America, which has mistreated Dubai despite synergies with our interests, its a windfall. If you remember, Dubai in 2006 bought US port operations and found itself vilified as a terrorist logistics center. Members of Congress now in the Obama administration -- among them the senator who is now president -- joined the Dubai-bashing. Well, it may turn out that this \"terrorist logistics center\" has one of the keys for fixing the Mideast's terrorism problem. The Dubai model is a mixture of social freedom, unbridled immigration, and raw capitalism. It is overseen by a government that is one of the world's least democratic. This is no accident. Dubai avoids both elections and the Arab obsession with politics, especially the syndrome of feeling slighted by the West. Dubai is pragmatic. It makes money doing business with Israel and Iran, countries shunned by other Arab states. The city's finessing of simultaneous friendships with Washington and Tehran is as deft as it is precarious. Dubai's government wrings efficiencies using schemes from Harvard Business School and General Electric. Its use of strategic planning is a new concept in the Middle East. Dubai conceives developments, like no-tax business parks, and builds them exactly as promised. In contrast with the surrounding police states, Dubai functions on the honor system. Alcohol is legal. Prostitution is tolerated. A nice example is the e-Gate scheme, which allows residents to use a biometric card to skip passport control. None of the neighbors has the confidence to replace state security with a smart card. Not Saudi Arabia, not Iran, not Israel. Saudis and Iranians, especially, find a refreshing dignity in Dubai, a respect for their ability to make the right choice. \"Friday you can pray, but Thursday night you might want to go to the bar,\" says a Dubai-based Saudi. \"It's up to you. \"Dubai is certainly taking risks. But rulers from Morocco to Iran are already Xeroxing parts of the Dubai playbook and waiting to see how the more controversial approaches pan out. For some, its a matter of self-preservation: Dubai's state-led development doesn't involve elections. For others its a bid to stop the hemorrhage of bright citizens and cash fleeing to Dubai. All of them ought to do more. Egypt, with its unemployed masses, could make use of Dubai's incentives for foreign investment. Syria might adopt its free trade ways. Iraq and Israel could use a dose of its religious tolerance. And its Gulf neighbors might streamline their bureaucracies as Dubai has. Of course, there are areas where neighbors emulate Dubai to their detriment. Dubai's abusive \"in-sourced\" labor market is one. Real estate is another. One hopes Dubai's property crash taught admirers what not to copy. And Dubai pays no heed to the environment. Thus Dubaians, with their monster 4x4s and chilled swimming pools, are the worlds most prolific polluters. But overall, Dubai's self-help mentality is the best hope for dragging this stagnant region into the global economic mainstream, with the accompanying stability and peace it implies. Its time Washington took notice.-- Jim Kranehttp://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/09/guest_post by L12/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt_24548
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 8:11:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thu, 4/23/15", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031472.txt_24560
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031472.txt
subject: Audio recording
messages:
  [{"sender": "King, Kathryn", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Will Bohlen", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:27 PM", "subject": "Audio recording", "body": "All, \nI just received a copy of the audio recording with Q&A. The video recording will be available mid-to-late \nafternoon. As the file will be too large to distribute via email, we have two posting options: \n\na) Upload to Steptoe's FTP site, where the file is public but not (easily) discoverable to the casual Steptoe.com \nbrowser or searcher. We would send reporters the link, at which point they would download the recording in \norder to watch it. \nB) Upload the file to Steptoe's YouTube channel and set the security around the video so that it's only \nwatchable by someone who has the link. It would not be discoverable by anyone who doesn't have the exact \nURL (searching or browsing). The advantage with this option is the reporters could watch the video via the \nYouTube player, rather than downloading a file. \nI believe our preference is the second choice? \nThanks, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:36 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Kathy. I think for now the FTP site is the right choice for getting it in the hands of reporters. We don't want it \ntoo accessible to people who might slice it up, and a youtube link would travel faster, I believe. We eventually want to \ntrim the video into chunks and post on YouTube through AFSV's channels."}, {"sender": "King, Kathryn", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:48 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Will, if you're concerned that people might want to slice it up, then we likely should not go with the FTP site \n(option A), because the link would not be protected and someone could find it. Posting on Steptoe's YouTube \nchannel (option B) with secured settings would make the link only accessible to those who receive the link. It \nwould also provide reporters with a faster way to view the video since they would not have to download \nit. Does that make sense?"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:50 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Ah, yes. That makes sense. Thank you."}, {"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "FYI — our vendor is creating a transcript from the audio recording, so I'll send that around when it's ready."}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Michael."}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "BBC story: \nhttp://www.bbc.comInews/world-europe-36988726"}, {"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn W", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:28 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "USA TODAY and Al Arabiya as well: \nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/08/05/cleric-extradition-turkey-coup/88288220/ \nhttp://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2016/08/05/US-eyaluating-new-Turkish-documents-on-\nGulen.html"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Wall St Journal: \nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/lawyers-for-imam-wanted-by-turkish-authorities-fear-for-their-clients-life-1470418445"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com)"], "timestamp": "8/5/2016 7:11:50 PM", "subject": "FW: Audio recording", "body": ""}]


