# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt_10393
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt
subject: Fwd: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["a Weingarten, Reid", "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": "Mccain cee mtn mn mr me a mmm Ni a mmm A mm em A NR ea RE NR ER RT ere TN"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nO00CO0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein's victims' attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims's lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt_10396
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 2:36:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fe"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "chat? #?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump likely to hire dershowitz , no kidding"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030736.txt_10397
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030736.txt
subject: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 1:41:12 AM", "subject": "Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article216997195.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032989.txt_10403
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032989.txt
subject: Re: Masa...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:22:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa...", "body": "tell him to ask nathan mhyrvold. . or bin salman"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa...", "body": "Trying to get you in with Masa crowd. Some resistance though, due to all the headlines/controversy - \n- as you might expect. I tell them about your relationship with Saudis/Gates/Trump crowd, but still \ndoubts. Working on it!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt_10407
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2014 7:06:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "When I was 8 years old, I watched my trial-lawyer father play Horace Vandergelder in the Livingston, N.J.,\ncommunity-theater production of “Hello, Dolly!” He entered wearing an enormous marching-band bass drum\n(the character is in a parade), and he roared to his sobbing niece, “Dammit! How am I supposed to play\n“Yonkers My Yonkers’ with all that bellowing in my ears!” It was the most exciting thing I had ever seen.\n\nI was a melancholic child. Worried, anxious. I never felt as if I belonged anywhere, as if I were a foreign\nexchange student living among the other kids, who seemed predestined to love sports. Add to that alienation the\nfact that my parents were going through a divorce, and I was truly treading water. But in that junior high school\nauditorium, I felt like ’'d discovered a secret I didn’t even know was being whispered. There was a place where\nI might belong: It was the Theater, and I was sold.\n\nA few years later, at Stagedoor Manor in Loch Sheldrake, N.Y., I joined an intensive theater boot camp for kids\njust like me. The second I stepped off the bus, I felt like baby Simba when he’s lifted into the air in “The Lion\nKing” and all the animals sing. Everyone was affectionate; everyone hugged; no was called “gay” for doing\nanything that wasn’t masculine. (My insecurity about this had shamefully kept me from doing theater in\nschool.) It was utopia, and I never wanted to leave.\n\nFrom left, Helene Yorke, Zach Braff and Lenny Wolpe in the musical “Bullets Over Broadway.” Credit Sara\nKrulwich/The New York Times\n\nIt was there I met Michael Larsen, the musical director of the camp. He told me that I wasn’t just a camper\nhaving fun, but that I also had talent. And he was tough — sometimes he’d scream at me — but I knew it was\nbecause he thought I had a shot. (Michael was the first of many gay men instrumental in guiding me to where I\nam now, which is why I try to speak on behalf of gay rights whenever I can. But I suppose that’s a different\nessay.)\n\nAt 18, I was cast as Woody Allen and Diane Keaton’s son in the film “Manhattan Murder Mystery,” my first\nmovie role. And now, after studying film and theater at Northwestern University, playing J. D. on “Scrubs” on\nTV for nine years and directing two films, I’m working with Woody Allen again. I’m typing these words in my\ndressing room at the St. James Theater, where on April 10 Pll open in “Bullets Over Broadway,” a musical\nadaptation of his hit film. I play David Shayne, a struggling writer in 1929 New York who agrees to cast a\nmobster’s ditsy girlfriend in one of his plays in order to get it produced.\n\nThe St. James is where Yul Brynner opened in “The King and I” in 1951; where hits like “Oklahoma!,” “The\nPajama Game,” “Gypsy,” “The Who’s Tommy,” and “The Producers” played, and where, in 1964, by the most\nsurreal of coincidences, Carol Channing first descended an endless staircase in “Hello, Dolly!” I sit in Dressing\nRoom 201, where many of the great luminaries of the Broadway stage — Patti LuPone, Nathan Lane, Mandy\nPatinkin — have paced waiting for the intercom to chime, “Places for Act I, please.” This is the sanctuary that a\nlittle invisible boy in New Jersey dreamed he’d one day find.\n\nZach Braff in a 1988 production of \"Godspell\" at Stagedoor Manor. Credit Stagedoor Manor\n\nIt’s my first time on Broadway, but not my first time onstage. My first job straight out of college was in George\nC. Wolfe’s production of “Macbeth” at the Public Theater, starring Alec Baldwin, Liev Schreiber, Angela\nBassett and Michael C. Hall, and I’ve since appeared Off Broadway in shows at the Delacorte and Second Stage\nTheater."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt_10411
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:14:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt_10414
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt
subject: Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2018, at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2018 12:53:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "This drives me f*ing crazy.\n\nSimple question for your boy: Did Donald Trump actively promote the theory that Barak Obama was not born\n\nin the US and was therefore not a legitimate President?\n\nAnswer: Yes.\n\nHe should not defend that shit. He can defend populist/nationalism all he wants, but when he bullies people\n\ndefending obvious Trump lies, he loses credibility."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt_10417
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt
subject: Re: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "<111=1M>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032023.txt_10422
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032023.txt
subject: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/1/2019 12:46:20 PM", "subject": "AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?", "body": "Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?\nIn July 1915, Hussein ibn 'Ali, the Sherif of Mecca, sent a letter to Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, informing him of the terms for Arab participation in the war against the Turks. The letters between Hussein and Mac-Mahon that followed outlined the areas that Britain was prepared to cede to the Arabs in exchange for their help."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt_10428
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:58:30 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "What is this??? When this will stop. This is crazy. \nAnd you are NOT 57;) \nAnd certainly you are NOT socially awkward. \nWho is that idiot. \nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:28 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance \n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2on/o3/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaincom/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \n\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who \nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory \nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at \nhome via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \n\nAnd Ghislaine? \n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl \nissues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You \ndon't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett \ndidn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he \nhas been open about. \n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look \nat Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for \nall sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt_10439
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <ee>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:26:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt_10459
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
subject: Re: Darren Indyke
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Here goes:\n\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\n\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\n\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\n\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\n\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 6:40:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Darren Indyke", "body": "Darren Indyke\nAlso think there should be a line in there somewhere which clearly confirms that JE understands and recognizes\nthat he did something wrong"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030394.txt_10460
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030394.txt
subject: RE: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 22:58", "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Over crests and furrowed field\nWirey talons arching back\nEmpty roosts the plagued aspise\nRevel in their bloodied eyes\n\nWe fight on.\n\nThanks for sharing the foxhole.\n\nBest\n\nJes"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt_10476
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt
subject: Missing message
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 8:21:20 PM", "subject": "Missing message", "body": "no evidence you got the latest so i have sent you just the key message itself—rather long so i have put in bold \nthe only references to Enhanced Learning Foundation—references had to do with paying Amy Jacobson 30 \ngrand for a year of work on Honour killings—my own expenses covered by myself \n\nof course i know little or nothing about stocks but i do feel like Trump is nothing but bad news for them, which \nfrightens me, given that he has 2 more years—it has cost me >$100,000 recently not for obvious economic \nreasons but because it looks like we have no one sensible in charge of the whole country \n\nDecember 16 \nam good so far \nhad a very productive two days with my research assistant Amy Jacobson in New Jersey \nwe now have 60+ papers on honour killings in Jersey and another 20 in Jamaica \nespecially important areas are Pakistan, Turkey (Kurds), Saudi Arabia and India \nlots of variation in mating system, form of homicide, reasons given, frequency of multiple victims and/or \nmultiple perpetrators, degree of retribution and so on \nam working out the logical details on inheritance—females seem invariably to count for 1/2 of what a male does \nin Islam \nparallel-cousin marriages—father's brother—occur in the desserts of Saudi Arabia—it radiated out from there \nwith Islam—such systems are selected in competition with each other, as in Iraq—two paternal lineages bind \nagainst others similarly binding \ndeserts in other primates are often associated with more intense male-male between group fighting, e.g. \nhamadryas vs regular baboons—that we were doing more than riding the camels in the dessert is suggested by \nthe fact that a lactose-tolerant gene arose in that area related to the lactose of camels, so we were apparently \nmilking our camels ! \ni believe you have heard of the Enhanced Learning Foundation; it got me to where i am today on this \nsubject, and perhaps it may wish to go further \ni intend to do a year of intense work and then summarise. i was never mentally as fast as you and i am certainly \nnot getting faster with age (76 this February) but i do have a good eye for fundamental logic and i believe this \nwill be the last serious project in my life--i will not let go until i have wrapped this whole thing up, especially \nwith the help of Amy, who is now putting together a master Excel file on all this \ni plan a book on all of this of course, it will be co-authored by Dr Jacobson \nif the ELF wanted a formal proposal, i am happy to do so \n\nBTW resistance already making itself known—Texas A&M biology showed interest in hiring me but faculty \nwere critical of my honour killing work—particularly (as usual) my claim that victims were often beautiful—\nwhere was my \"metric\" for beauty?—without which i was not allowed to speculate--and wasn't i disrespecting \nthe dead by saying they were often beautiful while still alive !! \ni have thought through trans-sexuality in humans to my satisfaction—i will get back to you shortly on that \n\nall best \none final anecdote on Trans \nmet a very attractive 42 year old woman in New Orleans, married, 4 children, thoroughly heterosexual—no \nlesbian relationship—but she had a fantasy of being f—kid by a male -> female trans because she preferred a \ncock in her but also liked a female figure, hips, ass, soft skin etc—hadn't seen that anywhere on the internet! \n\nall best, in haste \nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt_10479
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk, I have great hopes for this and am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and presence is less than A , and probaby closer to a C +/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would like to chat."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\nHow's late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\nmother 102 in May.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 1:04:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt_10496
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt
subject: Re: July 22
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "6/27/2009 11:22:50 AM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "now is fine"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Jun 27 07:04:52 2009", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "Call me this afternoon\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <1111.111.1111>", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 26, 2009, at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "So I go to a designer's cocktail party last night and Jonanthan and Kimberly Farkus are there telling me about your coming home \ncelebration and there might be on seat left on his cousin's plane... .do you know about this? \nI mentioned that you said there was no \"release\" party.... \nI am coming if there is one- if you don't a \"surprise\" event- you might want to get into this. \nYour friends are counting the days to freedom... \nWent to Heyward Isham's funeral today... father of Ralph and Chris...very sad. Old wasp diplomat who was our Ambassador to \nHaiti in 60's- sounds like CIA... is CIA \nGoing to dinner with Amy Irving, her husband and Mario Platero, a brilliant Italian (Jewish) journalist- very chic- wife in \nEngand- he travels with Obama...runs big news agency here- very funny- you will love him- will introduce in your new life.. \nCannes Diary finally went to press... \nWas in LA for 3 days of meetings with every studio.. working hard for the business.. its there, but it'a like begging to get them \nto spend so we spend our days getting underwriting.. thank God I have a guy in the office that does this... \nPoured all day in Hamptons- sun just came out... \nMiss you... \nxoxo Peg"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt_10498
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you can, send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks. . as you can see trump now said he wants a deal with iran. nuts"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["JEFF EPSTEIN [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 7:57:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free information.\nV-BR\nAlireza ITTIHADIEH"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt_10499
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny Po", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future.\n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from you soon."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny Po"], "timestamp": "8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:20:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to 10% per yr with a kicker"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt_10500
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt
subject: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is 0UUCOY and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:47:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt_10501
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt
subject: Re: STT
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "9/30/2017 9:46:50 PM", "subject": "Re: STT", "body": "no hes going to pr only maybe pence on fri"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski <P", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM", "subject": "Re: STT", "body": "Jeffrey\nI hear Pres Trump arrives in St Thomas on Tuesday FYI\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023427.txt_10503
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023427.txt
subject: Re: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or, getting creamed on my \nproducer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be \nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there. \nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready. \nA few other follow ups: \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget. \nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no \nactors, no travel beyond the one location, certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david \n brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less --\nprobably 1, 250,000 all in. But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does Wgbh. \nBut I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for templeton, so \nthank you. \nI really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff, but in googling him I noticed that we have the \nsame birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:06:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Fab! And tomorrow?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt_10512
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt
subject: Re: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New <1111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or, getting creamed on \nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be \nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there. \nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready. \nA few other follow ups: \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget. \nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance, \nno actors, no travel beyond the one location, certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or \ndavid brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said, I think If were hiring the crew id do it \nfor less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As \ndoes Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for \ntempleton, so thank you. \nI really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff, but in googling him I noticed that we have the \nsame birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "What time????"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "thurs 1"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2014 1:47:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "See you at 1:00...."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt_10514
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 5:13:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "schwartman"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn [unknown]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump in your neighborhood today. Looks like he is going to 740 Park for a fundraiser."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021475.txt_10524
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021475.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 08/17/2007
messages:
  [{"sender": "FBI Miami", "recipients": ["New York"], "timestamp": "08/17/2007", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 08/17/2007", "body": "FBI Miami requests travel concurrence from FBI New York to conduct witness interviews and serve target letters on subjects."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt_10530
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
subject: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — \nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a \nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records \nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have \nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. \nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? \nPlease let me know."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... \nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition \nwill follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:05 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt_10537
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt
subject: Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren lndyke [dkiesg@aol.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 9:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2018 at 4:38:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein\nAs-it-happens update • May 3, 2018\nTom Arnold is gonna find the pee tape\nAV Club\n... Trump and Charles Kushner with \"young Russian hookers\" in Florida; a tape involving\nbillionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein; what Arnold has called Trump's \"version\nof the Ray Rice elevator tape;\" assorted \"Howard Stern tapes;\" and, most obviously \"The Pee Pee\nTape,\" essentially the ... \nas irrelevant\nSee more results Edit this alert\nYou have received this email because you have subscribed to Google Alerts.\nUnsubscribe I View all your alerts\nReceive this alert as RSS feed\nSend Feedback"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt_10540
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt
subject: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:08:12 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nOOO00C0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights case to\n\nthe U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said Tuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims.\n\nThe reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. “BJay” Pak, will\noversee the case for the government. Pak, a former Georgia lawmaker, was appointed Atlanta’s chief federal\n\nprosecutor by President Trump in October 2017.\n\nThe Justice Department is still under a Friday deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims’ attorneys in an\neffort to settle the case. On Feb. 22, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in Palm Beach ruled that federal\n\nprosecutors, under former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, broke the law when they concealed a plea"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt_10541
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how much time should 1 allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nFor taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready\n\nAnd , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd fora YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YTVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)\nLisa"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 6, 2013, at 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill check ,, what time do you have to be in ny on the 23 rd? ?."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This event is at the apartment of the chairman of the YIVO board. My plan had been to take the 4 or 5 shuttle and cab right here"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt_10549
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 5:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "happy chanukah. . - has anyone in the past made a linguistic model that used fields instead of definitions, similar to a magnet field. to some degree. there is no one vector that describes the word but a field of them. home surrounded by a field of definitions. not based on 3 d space but based on context . one could integrate over the field. see smoothness. strength, change. . not sure it is useful. but having fun"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "For word meanings, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in Carnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't see how to work it out, or to extend it to the interpretations of longer units."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 12:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "one of donalds closet people said that remember, he has written three books. few people in the world that has written more books than he has read which makes him one of the"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/26/2016 6:56:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I read what his ghost-writer said about him. Pretty scary. Reminds me of something I was told by Jon Snow, one of England's most sensible newsmen. He was with the press entourage accompanying Tony Blair on his visit to Saudi Arabia, and walking around one of the palaces one day, he saw Blair sitting in a room with a book in his lap, which greatly surprised him -- until he came over to talk. It was the New Testament. And then Blair started telling about how delighted he and Cheri were with the gold door handles,.... I notice that your prediction was right about Trump's avoiding the White House as far too primitive. Must be driving the Secret Service up the wall. I'll keep in mind what you say about Trump's tweets, but they are hard to ignore. Whatever he may think, others here and abroad can't help considering the meaning of the words, and take action accordingly. About meaning, It's not clear to me how to distinguish the meaning of \"New York\" (however it is correctly specified) from the concept. Still don't see how to work out field models.\nNoam"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt_10551
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/24/2012 4:58:47 PM", "subject": null, "body": "have one of your cronys ask to see the mortgage to mara lago cash from electricinas union„ ( his driver MAtt \nwas the bag man, later made an exec at the public co. ) and the 30 milllion dollar loan from the casino to donald \ntrump. backdated,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt_10553
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt
subject: Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/16/2011 8:28:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "Yes\nSorry for all the typos"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2011, at 5:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "confirming that donation is to Stockholm School of Economics for 25k"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2011 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "25k from enhanced ed"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Check out", "body": "- Sok pa Google"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2011-05-14 12:18:45 Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "she has been in my house. I will give you the 25k that you need."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "Click here:________________________- Sok pa Goodie I met this terrific girl in a church in Gotland, godmother to my friend Angelina Johns baby girl..she was so beautiful I thought - and she is obviously! And nice! Wants to do more good for Africa than she already does..thought of you but she may not be the Swedish girl we look for.... I am packing last minute - did not hear back from you...its ok I understand if it was much to ask for...but you did it last year so now when things are tough you spoilt me..! I will meet your friend Bill Clinton in Stockholm this Thursday - at the royal opera!! - next year SALSS - if I survive this year...will have a focus on Globalization and I thought I ask him to come....?! Anyway, off we go, me and Lalla...to start with to interview 10 candidates for FEOY 2011...Much love BE"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt_10583
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt
subject: Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race
messages:
  [{"sender": "FT Breaking News <FTgemailbriefings.ft.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "September 15 2013 23:50:52 GMT+03:00", "subject": "Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "Sunday September 15 2013\nBREAKING NEWS\nSummers withdraws from Fed race\nLawrence Summers has taken himself out of the running to be the next chair of the Federal Reserve, withdrawing his name after opposition from key Democratic senators indicated they would oppose his nomination.\nMr Summers, a former Treasury Secretary and senior economic adviser to Barack Obama in his first term, galvanised opposition among left-of-centre Democrats who painted him as symbol of the wrongs of financial deregulation."}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL.\nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:15:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "yes the good side is now he is free to have fun and a life. LIsa the wife is very happy as she did not want to live in two cities. tell you more when i see you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027054.txt_10592
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027054.txt
subject: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Frost [kevin.frost@amfar.org]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris:\n\nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI’m getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let’s get together on Friday night.\nSee you soon,\n\nKevin"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\n\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\n\nI’ve also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey’s information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt_10601
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["?", "larry"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where 1 will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be assayay andI, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We have a ticket for [J to go back to Paris on Nov 24. What date shall I change this to since she will be\ntraveling with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:52:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "27"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023426.txt_10602
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023426.txt
subject: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/23/2014 10:17:55 PM", "subject": "Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on \nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may \nbe someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table \nthere . when do we do Whitman's \"song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready . \nA few other follow ups : \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low \nbudget . No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright \nclearance , no actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or \njustice elena kagan or david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think if were \nhiring the crew id do it for less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David \nhas . That has value too. As does wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to \nbe much more prepared for templeton, so thank you . \nreally liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have \nthe same birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt_10606
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do \nwith his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with \nbeautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I \nalways judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've \nnever seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would \nbelieve him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, \nKrauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a \nthoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who \nhave been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against \nEpstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or \nrational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is \npossible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with \nunderage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you \nwant to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were \nunderage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such \ncircumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage \nof him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine \nhis life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for \nsomething that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I \nfully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with \nJeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI \nknow and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, \nbecause in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of \nthe young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, \nand I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very \nstrongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the \ntime to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and \nthere was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or \nconsequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from \nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:15:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt_10607
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "if you can, send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks. . as you can see trump now said he wants a deal with iran. nuts"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free information."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "On 24 Jul 2018, at 22:10", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i thought you were selling it"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 8:13:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm not being funny, We got an Offer a few hours ago and we're going to accept it."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt_10610
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt
subject: Re: World economy growth interesting reading
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:15 PM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "* 11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA \nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET \n*How to tell when a real recovery begins.? \nBy Rick Newman \n*Obama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year. \nReuters \n11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA \nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET \nWhen times are tough, one thing that tends to raise the spirits is knowing that somebody else has it worse. And as wretched as the \nU.S. economy seems, its not as bad as in other regions. \nThe International Monetary Fund's latest tally of world economic conditions forecasts a 2.6 decline in U.S. economic output for all of \n2009, and anemic growth of 0.8 percent in 2010. That's more optimistic than the IMF's prediction from three months ago, but those \nare still lousy numbers. A weak economy throughout 2010 would mean a bleak employment picture, an agonizingly slow housing \nrecovery, and another year or two likely to feel like a recession, whether its technically labeled that or not. \nWe should count ourselves lucky, though. The IMF expects at least 11 major parts of the world to have more severe economic \ncontractions than the United State this year, including most of western Europe, Japan, Russia, and Mexico. Europe will still be \nstumbling along behind the United States next year, as well. Here are the IMF's projections for economic growth in various parts of \nthe world: \n2009. 2010 \nChina. \t7.5. \t8.5 \nIndia. \t5.4 \t6.5 \nMiddle East 2.0 \t3.7 \nAfrica. 1.8 4.7 \nBrazil. -1.3 2.5 \nWorld total -1.4 2.5 \nCanada. \t-2.3 \t1.6 \nU.S. \t-2.6 \t0.8 \nFrance. \t-3.0 \t0.4 \nSpain. \t-4.0 \t-0.8 \nU.K. \t-4.2 \t0.2 \nE U. \t-4.7 \t-0.1 \nE Europe. -5.0 1.0 \nItaly. \t-5.1 \t-0.1 \nJapan. \t-6.0 \t1.7 \nGermany. \t-6.2 \t-0.6 \nRussia. \t-6.5 \t1.5 \nMexico. \t-7.3 \t3.0 \nIf these projections come true, it means the United States, despite its overspent consumers, wrecked banks, and insolvent auto \nmakers, will be leading the world economy out of recession. Somehow. The developing world will help, but those high growth \nprojections in China and India can be deceiving. \nChina in particular has government policies that practically mandate high growth, and 8.5 percent in 2010 would be just about the \nbare minimum to keep employment at tolerable levels. And neither China nor India is a major buyer of American-made goods and \nservices; for the most part, its the other way around. With much of the developed world trailing the United States, it will take \nAmerican consumers to ratchet up demand for the world's products. Scary thought. \nHow to tell when a real recovery begins.? \n4 Ways to Tell When a Real Recovery Has Begun \nYou could conclude just about anything from the daily cavalcade of economic statistics. Some suggest an imminent recovery. Others \nseem to foretell years of gloom. The bent of the expert interpreting the latest news—bull, bear, Obama-basher, Wall Street-hater—\nhas as much to do with the outlook as the numbers themselves. \nFor the foreseeable future, there will be an aggressive hunt for two economic recoveries. One is the technical improvement in \neconomic indicators that signals the economy is growing again. That's the one economists care about, which is why they scour the \nnumbers on retail sales, business inventories, purchasing manager sentiment, subatomic inflation, the mood in Shanghai, and \nanything else that could help pinpoint the exact inflection point for a turnaround. \nThe other recovery, the one that most consumers are waiting for, is the one in which companies stop firing and start hiring, banks \nreturn to normal lending, and families stop worrying about jobs and income. And that turnaround—the consumer recovery—is likely \nto take much longer to materialize than the technical recovery. \nThe danger of hyping a technical recovery is that it will arrive, with much fanfare—but fail to make ordinary consumers feel better \noff. Many economists, for example, are predicting that the recession will officially end by this summer or fall. The only problem is \nthat when a technical recovery begins, a lot of companies fail to get the memo. They don't play along; they keep payrolls lean and \nmaybe even continuing to lay off workers. So to guard against false optimism, here's how to tell when a real recovery is finally \nkicking into gear: \nUnemployment improves. The single best indicator of the health of the economy is the job market. People who have lost their job, or \nworry that they might, obviously hoard their money and don't spend. That spells doom for an economy driven by consumer spending, \nas ours is. But once its clear that jobs are coming back, consumers are more likely to relax and open their wallets. \nProjections about unemployment should make anybody queasy about the prospects for a recovery this year. The unemployment rate \nis currently 9.4 percent, a steep rise from one year ago, when it was an unremarkable 5.5 percent. And by most accounts, its going to \nget worse. The International Monetary Fund expects the U.S. unemployment rate to be 10.1 percent in 2010. Economist Gary \nShilling thinks unemployment will hit 11.4 percent and not peak until late next year. \nIts hard to imagine a \"recovery\" in which jobs are even more scarce than they are now. When the unemployment rate finally starts to \ngo in the other direction, we can start to think about putting the umbrellas away. Until then, no number of upticks or volume of \noptimistic talk will persuade Americans worried about their jobs that they should part with precious cash. \nHousing prices stabilize. This has become a mantra by now: For the economy to get healthy, housing prices must stop falling. \nProblem is, the houses haven't been listening. \nHousing matters for two reasons: It represents a big chunk of the economy, and its the largest single repository of Americans' \nhousehold wealth. With prices falling, buyers are scarce, since nobody wants to buy an expensive good today if its going to be worth \nless tomorrow. With few buyers, all the other economic activity that swirls around real estate—remodeling, appliance and furniture \nsales, relocation services—is depressed. Homeowners are worse off, too, because the value of one of their vital assets is eroding. \nHouse prices have already fallen by 32 percent nationwide from the 2006 peak. And they have further to go. The latest readings on \nthe S&P/Case-Schiller home price index, one prominent measure, showed another record decline in May. At some point, the declines \nwill moderate and stop being records. But prices need to stop falling altogether, and probably rise, for a real recovery to happen. The \nFederal Reserve thinks home prices could stop falling in 2010, after a total decline of 41 to 48 percent. Other metrics, like housing \nstarts and new-home sales, might point upward before then. Those will be signs of signs of a turnaround, not the real thing. \nHousehold wealth increases. The housing bust and the volatile stock market have hammered the traditional investment tools that \nmost Americans use, causing epic declines in the wealth of Americans. Since 2006, household net worth has declined by about $12 \ntrillion, which equates to about $107,000 of lost wealth for each of America's 112 million households. That's partly because of the 40 \npercent plunge in the stock market since October 2007 and partly because of the steep declines in real estate values. \nAmericans simply own less, too. Home equity for the typical homeowner is just 41.1 percent, a record low. In 2002, it was 58.4 \npercent. Owning less means we owe more and will have to rebuild savings before we can spend like we used to. \"This will be a drag \non all discretionary purchases,\" says Dirk van Dijk, an analyst at Zacks Investment Research who thinks the tightfistedness will cut \ninto the earnings of firms ranging from hotel chains to furniture makers to motorcycle manufacturers. Those are the same kinds of \ncompanies that need to start hiring again for a real recovery to develop. But they won't if sales stay sluggish. A turnaround will \nrequire sustained stock market gains and an end to the housing bust. \nPresident Obama stops fudging on the economy. There's still a lot that could go wrong, and Obama knows it. Yet part of the \npresident's job is to reassure skittish Americans, even as his economic lieutenants are fighting battles in the war room. That's why \nObama has been making half-hearted pronouncements, like saying that the economy shows \"some return to normalcy\" and that \"we \nexpect there'll be some stabilization of the economy.\" Virtually all of Obama's remarks on the economy contain modifiers and future \ntense and a not-quite-there-yet quality, since hell blow his own credibility if he tries to convince Americans that they're better off \nthan they actually are. When Obama starts hedging less, be happy. That will signal better days. Finally. \nThe IMF does offer a bit of more heartening news: The global wipe out finally seems to be receding. \"The world economy is \nstabilizing,\" the IMF reports. Its global economic growth projection of 2.5 percent in 2010 is 0.6 points higher than predicted in \nApril. But the global economy isn't expected to gain its footing in earnest until the second half of 2010. Maybe by then American \nspenders will have come out of hiding. \nObama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year Reuters \nObama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year \nBy Tom Doggett — Sat Jul 11, 3:13 pm ET \nWASHINGTON (Reuters) — President Barack Obama said Saturday more time was needed for his $787 billion stimulus package to \nwork, predicting the spending would have a bigger impact on the economy later this year. \nIn an advanced text of his weekly radio speech, Obama said the stimulus plan approved by Congress and signed into law in mid-\nFebruary \"was not designed to work in four months -- it was designed to work over two years.\" \nU.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said it was too soon to decide whether the U.S. economy needed the help of a second-\nround of government stimulus to recover from recession. \n\"I don't think that's a judgment we need to make now, can't really make it now prudently, responsibly,\" he said in a taped interview \nwith CNN that will air Sunday. \nAccording to a transcript provided by CNN, Geithner said the \"biggest thrust\" of the stimulus package signed into law earlier this \nyear would take effect in the second half of the year. \nObama's comments follow government data showing the unemployment rate soared to 9.5 percent in June, the highest level since \n1983 and above the 8 percent peak predicted by the White House when it worked with Congress to pass the package. Republicans \nsay the stimulus plan is not working. \nObama now warns unemployment likely will top 10 percent in the coming months. \n\"We must let (the stimulus plan) work the way its supposed to, with the understanding that in any recession, unemployment tends to \nrecover more slowly than other measures of economic activity,\" Obama said. \nHe said the benefits of the plan would \"accelerate greatly throughout the summer and the fall.\" \nThe continuing recession and further steep job losses are wearing away the patience of Americans and raising doubts about Obama's \nhandling of the economy. \nThe share of Americans who believe the stimulus package will restore the economy slipped to 52 percent in late June, down from 59 \npercent two months earlier, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll. \nVice President Joe Biden said the administration had \"misread\" how bad the economy was when it took office but that the stimulus \npackage would help the economy recovery and create jobs. \nSenate Republican Leader Mich McConnell Friday called the stimulus plan a failure. \nObama said it takes time for the plan's money \"to get out the door\" to pay for roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects that will \ncreate jobs \"because we are committed to spending it in a way that is effective and transparent.\""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "7/12/2009 11:37:00 AM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "mandelson is in london"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt_10615
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023616.txt_10616
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023616.txt
subject: Re: Larry Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much.\n\nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein:\n\nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. MB 2c | flew home today with Mr.\nFarkas and his family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. Andrew and\nare still stuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car.\n\nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us.\n\nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard.\n\nFondly,\nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 6, 2014, at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad it worked out. if you husband woudl like to see the island this week i will arrange it."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friend", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 12:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Andrew and Caroline would love to come see the island! I've cced him to work out the details....\nHappy New Year!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt_10623
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt
subject: Re: P.S.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:37:31 AM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "he can only be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. not oath breaking. . impeachment not likely \n, but eventual resignation, a possiblitiy - maybe after a period of time. not for a while. . \nmoney - its a privlege to help"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "I neglected to mention the importance of ACLU attorneys who have been receiving donations of many millions \nto aid their actions such as impeaching Trump based on breaking his oath of the affirmation of the \nconstitution..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt_10630
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt
subject: Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "----- Original Message -----\nFrom: Kristin Andersen\nSent: 03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\n\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New\nYork/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM -----\n\n\"wolfe,\nAlexandra\n\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\n\ncc\n03/07/201 Subject\n1 02:09 RE:\nPM\n\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein.\nwould he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his\nthoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on\nthe record. Also I'd like to run the information I\nalready have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending\nmore time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the\n2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new\ndirection he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that\narranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social\nlife changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions\nto his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it"}, {"sender": "Kristin Andersen", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "\"wolfe,\nAlexandra\n\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\n\ncc\n03/07/2011 02:09 PM\n\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein.\nwould he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his\nthoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on\nthe record. Also I'd like to run the information I\nalready have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending\nmore time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the\n2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new\ndirection he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that\narranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social\nlife changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions\nto his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt_10631
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_____________________>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff.. i m praying"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek.. i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night."}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait.. will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< -"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "< -", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "00 i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_____________________>"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "perfect. I 11 be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "<_____________________>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffreyi"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 7:28:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "women to drive in saudi .. bold move"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt_10633
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt
subject: Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 9:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:40:36 -0800", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance \n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \n\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who \nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair story \nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you, Vicky,\" was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at \nhome via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \n\nAnd Ghislaine? \n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdoch's. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual peccadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about the very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl \nissues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You \ndon't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett \ndidn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he \nhas been open about. \n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look \nat Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for \nall sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024407.txt_10639
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024407.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazovithe-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? i m between alber and santa fe„ zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 8:48:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I will let you know when I go back. Do you know her?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt_10648
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "00 i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "perfect. I 11 be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffreyi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 11:02:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very wellci4"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt_10649
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\nSkype\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:32:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt_10654
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt
subject: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr. [Deeyacation@gmail.com]", "Connie Zaguirre"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:16:00 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Trump has been moved to Sept. 24."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please let me know when u do."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... Still working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know.\nJess —"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt_10656
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny"], "timestamp": "8 févr. 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "EL HACHEM Johny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:01:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "I agree with your analysis.\n\nOn the debt side the yield will be low for sure. Nevertheless by leading the consortium and by being the Equity provider of the PPP than the double digit return will be possible\n\nHappy to discuss further"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt_10657
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt
subject: draft
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella x 8 rad Wechsler [nn"], "timestamp": "10/26/2015 6:08:48 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million , ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for\nrestructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price. for both, lets say approx $8-15m ._ leaving loss\nof between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28% obama. tax 3.8%. city and state\n\n12% total aprox 43%. tax rate. savings 38.7-44m"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030910.txt_10663
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030910.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss iii"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peoplel know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of.. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt_10667
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm ler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmlecr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler Sa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm ler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:59:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt_10671
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 10:33:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/a-putin-friendly-oligarchs-top-us-executive-donated-285000-to-"}, {"sender": "LHS qa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2018, at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/d-e-shaw-fired-fund-manager-michalow-for-gross-violations STAY AWAY!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt_10672
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt
subject: A few thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff [is", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 7:55:54 AM", "subject": "A few thoughts", "body": "Importance: — High\n\n1) Isaw SB in London yesterday and he seemed especially paranoid about any reporters seeing me with him.\nMy guess is that he is working hard on his relationship with Trump who he sees as newly ascendent and being\nseen with me might queer that.\n\n2) He went on Hannity last night and will be on Piers Morgan tomorrow and that seemed with an eye toward an\naudience of one.\n\n3) He was having a meeting yesterday with the French right wingers, including Le Pen's husband, about\nrefinancing the National Front Party because apparently a good part of their money comes from Russia. Two\nthoughts here, these guys seemed like idiots, pure Ruritania, and Bannon, surrounded by his own thuggish-\nlooking security people and whacky-bloggers advisors, thrives precisely because the world of populism is so\nunprofessional (if not farcical).\n\nmore later..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt_10675
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 6:40:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Opinions"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt_10688
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match\nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East,\nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40-60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide\nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt_10692
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt
subject: Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/21/2018 7:26:45 AM", "subject": "Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics", "body": "Does the statement will help?\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/politics/top-republicans-slam-trump-saudi-arabia-khashoggi/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019384.txt_10701
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019384.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "09/13/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006", "body": "Please contact sat ed at\n[sd] should any further Information be needed."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt_10703
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt
subject: Re: TSA
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:53:26 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "TSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm,?\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt_10708
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:21:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Yes\n\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it, , we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to\ncome to europe?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt_10716
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 3:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So...a couple of times a year somebody can cull the Internet and write an article about you that recycles every other article. That's a reason to try to create a new story. But, on the other hand, by not offering new news the old seems just ho-hum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030356.txt_10721
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030356.txt
subject: RE: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 22:58", "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Over crests and furrowed field\nWirey talons arching back\nEmpty roosts the plagued aspise\nRevel in their bloodied eyes\n\nWe fight on.\n\nThanks for sharing the foxhole.\n\nBest\n\nJes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt_10722
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:22:33 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "this may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:"}, {"sender": "Lawrance Visoski", "recipients": ["Mr. Tarek El Sayed"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Mr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for\nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like\nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many\nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading\nits path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have\nseen already.\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\nSincerely,\nLawrance Visoski\nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt_10734
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt
subject: sorry | missed your call
messages:
  [{"sender": "John Brockman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/6/2017 8:34:19 PM", "subject": "sorry | missed your call", "body": "JE,\n\n--Last week was misery...On Tuesday, Katinka's' younger brother, Jonathan Matson, was planning on flying\nin from Boston and having dinner with her. After several emails back and forth in the morning, he wrote\nto say he was packed and ready to leave the house but he had been fighting a stomach bug, so he had\ndecided it was best to postpone and go to bed. He was fine at 6pm when his wife (a Mass General health\nprofessional) came home. She brought him a coke, went downstairs to make dinner. Half an hour later she\nwent upstairs to check on him. He had died. we got the news at 9pm on a phone call from someone we hadn’t\ntalked to in 20 years\" “Jonathan Matson has died” was impossible to process. Katinka is still was\ndistraught and, just coming out of shock.\n\n--And...this, from my older brother Philip C\"Distinguished NASA Physcist\" awardee), who had prostate\nsurgery about 25 years, and got lucky be living in Raliegh-Durham, near Duke Medical Center which is\ntops. They've kept him alive and it's finally caught up to him:\n\n\"IT have run out of standard treatments. Chemo is getting less effective with increasing side effects.\nThere is a new drug Keytruda it has been approved for some cancers but is still experimental for prostate\ncancer.\n\nhttps: //prostatecancernewstoday.com/pembrolizumab-immune-therapy-help-men-prostate-cancer/. I have been\napproved to get Keytruda and will start on Thursday.\"\n\n--Finally, did I ever tell you about the Biosphere crowd? Absolutely nutty cult I represented in the\nearly 90s. (Although individually the people were sometimes fun). My friend Roy walford, the doctor\ninside the Biosphere, eventually died because of a condition he developed while inside. I kept sending\nwriters down there to work with them and they would inevitably sneak away in the dead of night. I had to\nsell their book three times, each time for a fractions of the previous advance which started in 7\nfigures. Turns out Bannon took over as CEO of the place in 1993 so we may have overlapped. See:\n\nSteve Bannon Was Once Hired to Manage an Artificial world of People Living Under Glass (Before the Trump\nCampaign) -\n\nhttp://slate.me/2keSDUn\n\nIn the office this afternoon and after 10:30am tomorrow."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt_10735
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt
subject: Watching
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 2:03:17 AM", "subject": "Watching", "body": "chomsky's requiem for the American Dream. Fascinating. Brilliant guy. \nSeparately, trump is not a force for a civil society. EVERY taxi/uber driver I've encountered is FOR him. \nreally don't get it. \nHow are you? \n xo \nco-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt_10742
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2018 12:27:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "i think we have divergent views on Trump and trade for obvious reasons \nthe best economists say all-out trade war will cost the WORLD 2-3% of its GDP \nthis can hardly help the stock market \nbut the \"perturbations\" are meat for you—if you can see what to buy and sell ahead of time—or very quickly—\nin response to the latest tariffs you can beat the system \nTIA-CRF can not \nin good times, it does better than average—here it does distinctly worse—each hit is taken hard, each recovery \nis feeble—precisely because it does not change its portfolio or only slowly"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt_10767
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch. He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "After"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 9:10:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He shouldn't laugh off the grand jury"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt_10783
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 121 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:20:06 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "Hope you are Satisfied with the outcome all things considered.\n\nRidiculous article. All of sudden the NPA in EB’s case goes from no\njurisdiction even to prosecute to you avoiding a possible life\nsentence. Moronic.\n\nMan I sure would like to see you getting some in the W column though and\nsome press that at least presents the true facts that some of the girls have\nadmitted under oath. Still a story no one ever has heard and they are\ncompelling facts.\n\nGood Shabbos.\n\nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by\nwealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to\ntestify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil\nlawsuit against the registered sex offender.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-\ncivil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt_10788
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:40:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt_10789
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon [as]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\n\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and\n\nElizabeth Price Foley\n\nJune 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt_10790
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Please call me at \nMy number is blocked and it does not go through when I am calling you"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they \nneeded to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) \nfor two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell \nindividual seats). \nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. \nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all \nparty access. \nI have the same ones (through Bill). \nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. \nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is \nhard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. \nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena \nSchuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner \nwhich happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell \nyour friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =) \nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night. \nSee you soon,"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin, \nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much \nenjoy the Gala. \nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information. \nLet me know how I can be of further assistance. \nAll the best,\nLena"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt_10795
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt
subject: January 20, 2017
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey, \nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!! \nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA! \nLOVE & KISSES \nBE for your BBB!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt_10796
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?\n000"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 4:35:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt_10797
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump doesn’t like him"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont belive thepress"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 1:25:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt_10799
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt
subject: Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Auren Hoffman", "recipients": ["Lisa Randall", "Fouad"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:58 -0800", "subject": "Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Dear Fouad, \nDear Lisa — \nYou are invited to join us at Dialog 2014 -- a two-day bipartisan retreat discussing how to change the world. \nThere will be no speeches ... just many moderated break-out discussions of 6-15 people on various topics. And \nwe design the agenda around your ideas and needs. \nPlease let us know if you would like to join us, \n/- Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman/ \np.s. and yes, we know Dialog 2014 is 16 months away, but we are giving you a chance to sign up now \n*DETAILS*: \nYou're invited to join us at the Dialog Retreat ... 150 people to change the world ... a participatory and \nentrepreneurial conversation on changing the world. \nThe *Dialog*//participants aren't modest. We want to change the world. \nBut we don't want to spend our time being in a large audience listening to winded speeches. There are no \nspeakers. No panels. All attendees participate in break-out facilitated discussions. And we *limit the discussion \nto only 150 global leaders*who can have an impact now and emerging leaders who can help implement the \nplans we develop. \n*Dates**:**March 13-15, 2014 \n*Location:* Sundance Resort, Utah (40 minutes from the Salt Lake City airport) \n/We've rented out the entire resort/ \nRegister at: \nhttp://dialog2014.eventbrite.com  \npassword: dialog2014 \nYou qualify for a significant discount on the retreat fee. On the registration page, click on the link that says \n'Enter promotional code' and enter: \n*AcademicDialoger* \n/note: the invite is only for Lisa Randall and is not transferable as we are limited to only 150 participants. \nThere are no sponsors. We increase the retreat fee weekly to reward the people that sign up early. And this \nretreat is 100% off-the-record. / \nWe hope you can join us."}, {"sender": "Lisa Randall", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Is this worthwhile?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa Randall"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "sundance is nice „ go"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/28/2012 5:28:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "So let me understand. You are suggesting tourism?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt_10802
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt
subject: Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 9:18:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'", "body": "Hello Jeffrey\nI understood very well that it is in the Congress's hands now;\nBut there are a lot of reactions"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt_10805
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt
subject: Re: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 1:27:43 PM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf"}, {"sender": "+", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:26 AM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "Inside Job (2010)\n\nNYT Critics' Pick; This movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York Times.\n\nSony Pictures Classics\n\nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary “Inside Job.”\n\nWho Maimed the Economy, and How\n\nBy A. O. SCOTT\n“Inside Job,” a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime without\npunishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The betrayal\nof public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and damaging than\n\nthe adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than villain.\n\nThe gist of this movie, which begins in a mood of calm reflection and grows angrier and more incredulous\nas it goes on, is unmistakably punitive. The density of information and the complexity of the subject\nmatter make “Inside Job” feel like a classroom lecture at times, but by the end Mr. Ferguson has\nsummoned the scourging moral force of a pulpit-shaking sermon. That he delivers it with rigor, restraint\n\nand good humor makes his case all the more devastating."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt_10813
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
subject: Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Oliver Lane", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'\n\nby THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.11 Mar 2018\n\nAs Steve Bannon continues his tour of Europe, energizing the anti-establishment populist base, the mainstream media cannot help but admit their admiration for his abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. In this week's issue, the left-wing German weekly Stern articulates the greatest fear of the European establishment: that Bannon \"could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.\"\n\nMany thought that the reign of the \"Dark Lord\" had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon's adversaries had underestimated him, because he is \"as dangerous as ever,\" he confesses.\n\nKramper cannot conceal his respect for Bannon's ability to move a crowd. He was greeted by \"frenetic applause\" in his recent address before France's National Front party, Kramper writes, demonstrating his \"impressive potential,\" which the writer describes as \"dangerous.\"\n\nIn the mind of his audience, Bannon is something of a miracle-worker, Stamper notes, having \"done the impossible\" by bringing Donald Trump into the White House.\n\nThe reason Bannon is dangerous, Kramper continues, is because he \"lays out the political program of a worldwide right: He has already conquered the USA; now Europe and then the whole world will follow.\"\n\n\"You are part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary, bigger than all that,\" Bannon told French populists.\n\nBannon showed that he \"dominates the mood against the 'elites,' the 'establishment' and the 'perverse system' of greedy corporations and banks, and of course also against the press, which is led around 'like a dog on the Leash,\" Stamper writes.\n\nAnd now he Mr. Bannon setting himself up as an instigator, if not an outright shepherd, of a movement that crosses borders, languages and parties.\n\n\"Bannon is a master of apocalyptic rhetoric,\" Stamper continues, effortlessly weaving together nationalist interests with an international populist movement.\n\nThe American strategist showed his \"true caliber\" by expounding modern methods of political freedom through blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, Stamper said, leaving many of his hearers behind.\n\nBannon has demonstrated that if the right wants to rule the future, \"it must dominate modern themes and rhetorically position them,\" he added.\n\nAspiring to be far more than an uncle who tells stories to his nephews of how he won the fight for the White House, Stamper writes, \"Bannon wants to become the super godfather of the international right.\"\n\nAlthough Bannon often looks a bit disheveled, \"he should not be underestimated,\" the writer warns. Past business partners attribute impressive \"strategic foresight\" to the eccentric tactician, saying he was often \"three or four steps ahead\" of his opponents in business. Because of his phenomenal memory, his nickname is \"the encyclopedia,\" Stamper notes with a certain reverence, and in his speeches he will spontaneously cite \"forgotten thinkers, known only to a handful of specialists.\"\n\n\"Bannon brings with him exclusive knowledge of power from the very heart of power,\" Stamper writes, which he will bring to bear on Europe's fragmented populist populism.\n\nAccording to Stamper, Bannon has established his \"European headquarters\" in Italy, from where he intends to galvanize European populists.\n\nThe Italian political situation is completely to his liking, Stamper declares, with a political landscape \"dominated by populists, right-wing ideologues and the political puppeteer Berlusconi.\"\n\nFollow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter\nRead More Stories About:\nBig Government, Breitbart London, National Security, Europe, Germany, Nationalism, Populism, Stephen K. Bannon, Stern"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed. I will fly there tomorrow night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay out a strategy plan. how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Sean Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Roger that. Thanks for having us today."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt_10824
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt
subject: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2019 8:08:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "This is what I'm now going with—what do you think? \nIn the White House, the President, to general surprise, announced that he would not accompany his family to \nMar-a-Lago over the holidays—a confounding, even alarming, turn for anyone who knew how much he valued \na golf-and-warm-weather opportunity over any presidential business. Melania certainly had no intention of \nstaying behind. Among other issues, friends suggested that she was still furious about his fireside Christmas Eve \nchat with a seven-year-old boy, during which Trump asked the boy if he still believed in Santa. \"Melania didn't \nthink that was funny,\" said one aide. Trump was \"clearly a guy who had never dealt with a seven-year-old.\" \nIn an empty White House, Trump's personal secretary, 28-year-old Madeleine Westerhout, brought his \npapers and call sheets from the West Wing up to the residence, finding him, she told friends, in his underwear. \nAnd herein, suddenly, was another subplot. \nWesterhout had been the elevator girl in Trump Tower during the transition. The comely young woman ferrying \ndignitaries and job-seekers up to the President-elect soon became something of a meme herself Bannon recalled \nnoting that Trump took a particular interest in her. A leering Trump kept repeating, \"She's got a way about her,\" \nhis signature, and creepy, stamp of approval for young women. \nNow the president was telling friends that he wasn't staying at the White House because of the shutdown—he \nwas staying because he was \"banging\" Madeleine. \nShutdown bravado? Locker room talk? Or all part of a new alternative reality that only he seemed to be living \nin?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033509.txt_10830
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033509.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo off going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt_10834
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when I get settled..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Would put us in a different place...may even rouse you into action"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:07:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil in a fundamental way"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt_10842
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/9/2018 1:35:43 AM", "subject": "Three short pieces that might amuse you (still working on Obama)", "body": "Three short pieces that might amuse you (still working on Obama)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt_10853
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt
subject: RE: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett [paul@alphagroupcapital.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:57:15 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "We own 8000 shares on the thesis that their growing exposure to data center capex spend would be a big positive for the stock.\n\nRecommendation: Keep the stock and buy Aug $200 puts on the 8000 shares costing $6.50 or $52,000. Nothing has changed regarding their core business. Data center spending is not going to change based off this M&A transaction. However if I am wrong and the market further penalizes the stock at least our losses are contained. The stock has dropped $40 and I think we could easily recoup our premium if the market buys into the CEO's reason for the merger.\n\nIf I never had a position I would absolutely buy the stock using options. I would be selling October $185 puts and buying Oct $220 calls costing 50c/share.\n\nPaul"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Again?? How many puts ? What are the alternatives. The fact that you own the stock at a higher price is affecting your decision. Sorry. This is just ridiculous!!! Would you buy the stock here . ???? If you would would you also buy puts ??? My patience is at its end"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management.\n\nPaul Barrett"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt_10858
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt
subject: Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 2:22:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau"], "timestamp": "3/28/2015 5:59:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Elizabeth Sample <elizabeth.sample@samplepowers.com>", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 28, 2015 5:24 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fitz Corr <fitz.corr@example.com>", "recipients": ["Fitz Corr"], "timestamp": "March 27 4 PM EDT", "subject": "Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt_10879
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt
subject: Oil options
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nay Gupta", "recipients": ["njeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/ Vinit Sahni/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey \nJust got off the phone with Vinit. \nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated Pd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and \nout. \nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given \nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is \nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show \nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from \nRussia. Germany gets 30%. \nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each \nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused \non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up. \nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est): \n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92 \nand \n35d expiry 16apri12014 underlying clk4 97.59 \n** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM \n100 call for 25. Net pay Scents. But 5d is a bit short for me. \n**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c \n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents. \nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask. \nIf 5d is too short and 35d is too long / not enough gamma, Tazia may be able to source liquidity from the street. Am Cc'ing her for any \nlive pricing or additional comment \nBest \nNay"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time well be much quicker. \nNay Gupta"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 2:24:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "I am on a plane to and from tokyo tomorrow next 2-3 days, if u need something otherwise available 24/7 on +447703720599."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt_10887
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt
subject: Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth\nstocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle. Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on\nTV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen. I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good\nhamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling\n\ndiscussions. Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt\nceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency. The implication: reservations about raising\nthe debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then. This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt\nceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States. Today, the\nproposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues. While a default\nis a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is\nbad as well. Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal\nReserve would keep yields in check. That logic is irresponsible at best. Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way\nfor a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest.\n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been\nraised up the flagpole and then lowered. By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3\ntrillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all). However,\nCongress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first. For now,\nwe wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to. Last week’s Profiles in Courage\npiece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here. Here’s our take on what\nhas been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what\nsteps they recommend to get to that baseline first. For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s\nbudget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71%\ndebt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt_10890
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt
subject: Re: High Profile
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nYour name popped up again in the Press and I thought it was time to congratulate you on your wonderful\nfinancial successes since your days as my Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good!!\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press provides you with much benefit.\nPerhaps I am wrong? Not the first time!!\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging certainly ain't for sissy's.\n\nRegards,\n\nJamie Rosenwald\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in Amagansett in November."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt_10891
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt
subject: Please
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2015 5:22:10 AM", "subject": "Please", "body": "Please tell me Trump will not win the election... \n xo \n co-authored with i Phone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt_10900
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt
subject: Re: speak. JE
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak x"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Sure. Speak. When? #?\n\nBest\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehbarak"], "timestamp": "5 Nov 2016, at 8:52", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "speak?"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2016 3:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Hi Jeff\nThe Trump momentum,\nI believe was stopped.\n\nHillary might be on her way to Win. But with much lower margin, and probably still GOP controlled Senate.\n\nBest\nEB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt_10903
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 11:56:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was good...judge is new and afraid to go outside the box...maybe I should rep your buddy here...agreed to \nmeet pence one-on-one Thursday in dc"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how did today go . . https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-\nalleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share btn fb"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024384.txt_10910
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024384.txt
subject: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siege!", "recipients": ["Charlotte Abrams iy"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 7:40:43 PM", "subject": "Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt_10911
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt
subject: FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake <vinodabasnayake@...>", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho", "Bob Crowe", "Cheikh Tidianc Sy", "Mohamed Seydou Diagne", "El Hadji Amadou Sall"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details."}, {"sender": "abuulabass", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho", "Bob Crowe", "Mohamed Seydou Diagne", "El Hadji Amadou Sall"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com .\n\nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards.\n\nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Bob Crowe", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025975.txt_10913
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025975.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?\n\nB"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture ata time . put onein storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at atime."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste - this is why | am asking!\n\nB"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What | do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold.\n\nand maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt_10915
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [rs", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 11:04:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "looks like donald and mort are not to friendly..\n\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/ny-daily-news-calls-voters-mindless-zombies-after-donald-trump-wins-\nnew-hampshire-2016-02-10/print"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt_10923
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2017 12:03:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is truly stupid."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt_10924
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The Science of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt.\n\nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn RR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdul pmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert a Ottis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/22/2017 9:49:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "I’m flexible after Tuesday. (Doing CNBC on Trump-China Tues morning)\n\nI forgot to congratulate you on winning your loooooong-odds bet on Trump with Woody. Everyone I know, including me, would have bet against you. Quite extraordinary."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt_10939
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt
subject: Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting. We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April*, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go. We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West **. We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan. But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n* The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak. Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday. According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined. This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized. John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week. I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”. We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant. However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991). It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President. His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. (Justice Felix Frankfurter). It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.\n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff. In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d]. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012045.txt_10944
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012045.txt
subject: Financials: buy XLF call spreads
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.\n\nThat said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of Trump’s policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat call skew, “appearing” call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.\n\nBuy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium\n\ne Buyaii0% call\n\ne = Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)\no Total premium is 2.6%\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%\n\nPost Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)\ne US Buyback Flows\n\ne Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials sectors.\n\nGlobal Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector and are UW this sector in all regions.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)\n\nTrades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt_10947
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Sick a"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad ee", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you call me\n\nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza with 8 top girls he said he would like to\nbuild some thing with you\n\ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this meeting even Jean Luc could doo a\ngreat biz also\n\nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any deals with anybody before he meet\nwith you.\n\nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me know what is your plans\n\nwarmest regards\nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad (qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the other girl name is Anastasia kuznetsova"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Sick a"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 24 2010 04:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will be in paris tomooorw night"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt_10949
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Oct 25, 2015, at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence. . the cinese are willing to build a new \ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech. if he were to call it the obama xi \ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 1:02:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good idea. It didn't seem like Obama was that interested in hard sciences though... What's your read?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt_10952
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt
subject: Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Juleanna Glover FO", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 03:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Flagging for you. This went out to that circle of third party thinkers. Hope all is well, Jeffrey.!"}, {"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 2, 2018 at 2:45:08 PM CDT", "subject": "Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all —\n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five\n\nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group.\n\nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive\nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s\nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply\noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation\n\nshows no sign of ebbing.\n\nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will\nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election.\nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all\nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump\n\nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own “chaos” candidate in 2020?\n\nShould Trump run again, this could be a “break glass” moment for the majority of Americans who don’t"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt_10959
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joscha 82h", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 7:02:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry, if I understand correctly you are suggesting there are layers 1 through N. Lets call them L1 - Ln. There are times T1-Tn and then conjecture that changing the time correlations (by genetic switch or other method), you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. Like telomeres for the cell, are there equivalents for the layers. As you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get different (kill yourself if you are not being used instructions).\n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch up), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor development! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place.\n\nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more hunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, delayed gratification for agriculture etc.\n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communication. Are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions.\n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social and cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and learn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, because it does not help people or yield social attention.\n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with people, one will not have good social cognition.\n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect historically, the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and anti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia.\n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to understanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a motivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music. It would mean that Chomsky’s life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt_10963
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt
subject: Re: Quick question
messages:
  [{"sender": "[in", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc,\n\nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the\ngovernment in general, etc?"}, {"sender": "Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Do you want more free city for chanukH?"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Noy 3, 2010, at 3:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hmm perhaps. But I was thinking that I maybe wanted a speaker system for my room and bathroom..?!?"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 03:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "2: aa\n\nAs always , whatever you want!!\n\nSorry for all the typos ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt_10968
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [ia", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2018 3:32:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest ina 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish | was with you right now...so where are you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032208.txt_10971
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032208.txt
subject: lawkrauss -- 2017/07/11
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["lawkrauss"], "timestamp": "07/11/2017 11:42:34 PM", "subject": "lawkrauss -- 2017/07/11", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "07/11/2017 10:42:34 PM", "subject": "lawkrauss -- 2017/07/11", "body": "ok.. in france now.. we can talk next week.. after we deal with trump. :) Thanks for the driver!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt_10978
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029269.txt
subject: Fwd: woody and deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["soon yi previn"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:28:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: woody and deadline", "body": "???"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum \nsent me... .1 found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need \nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than \nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years. \nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next \nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing \nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and \nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those. \nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by \ncomputer."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031426.txt_10979
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031426.txt
subject: The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/28/2019 7:41:52 PM", "subject": "The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors", "body": "For ur info\nHow Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors\nThe Washington Post\nTrump's 'statements of financial condition' are a key component of inquiries by House Democrats and New York investigators. Read the full story\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026461.txt_10981
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026461.txt
subject: Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "December 2, 2017 at 8:16:13 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?", "body": "Did you see this"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?", "body": "27\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 2, 2017, at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?", "body": "like the hunt for easter eggs. your friend andrew has so far only found one . and it was brighly colored :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:30 AM", "subject": "Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?", "body": "I don’t know whether to laugh or cry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 2:36:15 PM", "subject": "Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?", "body": "after DJT actually signs it. I'll point out the location of the other eggs much more creative - overall though,\nthe writers were very sophisticated. they closed many many loopholes. and did it elegantly. example closing\nall the 1031 crazy transactions by merely inserting the word \" real\" in from of the word property very\n\nclever, or not redoing the paragraph but merely changing the penalty to zero. . or detailing related party\ndefinitions that had teeth. . they cant be faulted for not getting it right -100 percent :)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030738.txt_10982
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030738.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article216997195.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it „ we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to come to europe?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive News & Observer", "body": "Yes\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive News & Observer", "body": "yes . no worry, november too important to risk diversion, mission first"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:28:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer", "body": "Exactly\nBut somebody big has u in the gunsights"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023022.txt_10983
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023022.txt
subject:
  Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs: \nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial \nand the witness list which names________________and other young women who allege they were underage \nvictims of Mr Epstein. \nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their \nclaims. \nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and \ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter. \nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of \nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact \ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records. \nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET."}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:38:16 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 11:25:53 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt_10994
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt
subject: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [richardkahn@hbtk.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:06:12 PM", "subject": "Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbe.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedl y-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-\nmilken.html\n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a\npardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken\n\nTae Kim\n\nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken,\nBloomberg News reported Friday.\n\nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for\nsecurities fraud.\n\nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci,\nTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy\nGiuliani support the pardon for Milken.\n\nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered\nthe market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10\nyears in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and\nExchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years.\n\nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond\nto requests for comment.\n\nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033327.txt_11004
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033327.txt
subject:
  Former NJ Gov. Chris Christie visits the White House as Trump considers him to replace Jeff Sessions as attorney general

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2018 8:46:41 PM", "subject": "Former NJ Gov. Chris Christie visits the White House as Trump considers him to replace Jeff Sessions as attorney general", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/08/trump-considers-chris-christie-to-replace-sessions-as-attorney-general.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030496.txt_11005
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030496.txt
subject: any fun?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "any fun?", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "boris", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "any fun?", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt_11010
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028611.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe, tomorrow.."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won't talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is déjà vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month.."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2019 2:42:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have thought many, many things about you over the years.....never thought you were my cheryl....."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031340.txt_11011
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031340.txt
subject: Jones is crazier than Trumpo the Elephant
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/1/2018 11:59:13 PM", "subject": "Jones is crazier than Trumpo the Elephant", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028848.txt_11012
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028848.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Loi to Se", "Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:55:07 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "can you talk now?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "ae i * you havetime"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama’s response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has\n\nreinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader’s hidden wealth.\n\nhttp://ww.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\n\nfortune. html ?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt_11025
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt
subject: Re: off the record
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. QM the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon PY", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:17:14 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose?\n\nBut you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023548.txt_11028
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023548.txt
subject: Fwd: INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2013 5:32:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Begin forwarded message:\n\nFrom:\n\nSubject: INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY\nDate: March 7, 2013 7:31:14 AM EST\n\n1\n\nDear Mr. Jeffrey Epstein\n\nJared Kushner, New York's youngest powerhouse publisher, is celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the New York\nObserver on Thursday, March 14th.\n\nMayor Michael Bloomberg will be by his side to toast you all.\n\nThe Observer is honoring those who have defined and shaped New York since 1987. They are celebrating the cities\nbest, brightest and most influential in culture,media and finance. The salmon pink pages are revered among New\nYork's elite as the preeminent voice on power.\n\nThe celebration is going to be one of those quintessential New York nights. We are looking forward to seeing you.\n\nXOXO,\n\nPegey\n\nJared Kushner, Publisher Joseph Meyer, CEO\n\nCory Booker Arthur Carter Georgina Chapman Katie Couric Lauren Santo Domingo\nLarry Gagosian Mariska Hargitay Carolina Herrera Katie Holmes Woody Johnson\nPeter Kaplan Comm. Ray Kelly Ken Kurson Matt Lauer Blake Lively Terry Lundgren\nPeter Martins Cynthia McFadden Sean Parker Ron O. Perelman Stephen Schwarzman\nLara Spencer Steve Tisch Donald Trump Ivanka Trump Harvey Weinstein George C. Wolfe\n\ncordially invite you to join them at\n\nTHE NEW YORK OBSERVER\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023548"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030482.txt_11031
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030482.txt
subject: Re: basketball player
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 3 2011 12:55 AM", "subject": "Re: basketball player", "body": "Its such a circus with this politics thing...its ridiculous"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:40:02 +0200", "subject": "basketball player", "body": "obama was scheduled to sign the debt bill late yesterday, just hours before the midnig|ht Treasury deadline that could have seen the US default on its debts, a national in tar likely t t0 have Had a huge impact on markets and the global economy."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033333.txt_11032
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033333.txt
subject: President Trump’s Private Plane Clipped On Ground At LaGuardia Airport
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski ME", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 10:02:09 PM", "subject": "President Trump’s Private Plane Clipped On Ground At LaGuardia Airport", "body": "https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/11/28/president-trumps-private-plane-clipped-on-ground-at-laguardia-airport/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033455.txt_11036
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033455.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKAS", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/21/2019 1:21:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Somers and I talked to trump and Melania last night He looked and seemed very tired but upbeat\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt_11046
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:52:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting\nGrey is at least reasonably smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 28, 2016, at 7:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2016/05/01/trump-touts-henry-kravis-as-treasury-secretary-again-and-again-declines.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031432.txt_11047
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031432.txt
subject:
  The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump's Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him

messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 7:25:25 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump's Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him", "body": "He is crazy!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026475.txt_11048
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026475.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:23:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he feels alone. and is nuts !!!, I told everyone from day one. evil beyond belief. mad, and most thought i was\n\nspeaking metaphorically. its obvious he could crack. stormy daniels. ? lies after lies aflter lies."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is scaring the shit out of me now. He could well tank global economy. Can Barrack talk sense to him\nanymore?\n\nMaybe it’s time for you to jump in now. Given how he is throwing caution to wind in such epic fashion, why\nwouldn’t he take your call?\n\nGive it a shot!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt_11058
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.txt
subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:39:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is\n\nand I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt_11079
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt
subject: Re: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel [aseckel@yahoo.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:20:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "you can call as 1 am obviously (iim"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month,, you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then\nanother 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article\nleft on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to\nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on\na daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the\ntop. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to\nthis day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did\nmanage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it\nprominent.\n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now\nremoved.\n\nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head\nlines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthropic work, Epstein Foundation,\nPromotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki\nentry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing\nand wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now\nhas an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success.\n\nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google\nsearch.\n\nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material.\n\nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility,\nespecially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add\nnew content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped\ndown (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push\nHuffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google\nsearch are not of your mug shot, etc."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030710.txt_11082
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030710.txt
subject: Corker 'hopeful' on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2018 10:04:58 AM", "subject": "Corker 'hopeful' on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/14/corker-hopeful-war-powers-authorization-trump-464373"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026449.txt_11083
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026449.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "7/25/2017 10:03:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "MM had emailed me a couple of times. over the past 2 months. after I sent her that note she said she had little\nmoney, couldnt afford air condintioner. was living on a friends couch. really needed money. !!!!! 'Isent\nhersome\" , your friend bill is nuts. his former girl. cant afford air con, , cant affrod to travel to bridge\n\n, she said that sharon osborne used to arrange. . the lawyer helped her with papers. so she is ok, but\n\nbroke. . that story would take trump off the front pages The richest man in the world is so cheap , his\nformer bridge girl and toy , lives ona friends sofa. . WOWO"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt_11087
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/25/2018 2:19:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perhaps i misunderstood \"let's concentrate on you\"\nJamaica is bad enough but i have mastered that—at least the danger—4th highest murder rate in the world\n\nas for the US i have alienated large stretches of it—i will spare you the details\n\ni was amused that you are now friends with JD Watson\n\nhe single-handedly prevented me from getting a Junior Fellowship at Harvard\n\nIn 1972 I got my PhD in Biology and it was conventional to nominate the very best post-docs for a Junior\nFellowship, Harvard’s most prestigious award—it provided three years of research support without any duties. I\nwas the best student out of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology in more than 20 years. The entire department\n\nwas behind me.\n\nbut Watson was on the 3-man committee, in charge of all the science candidates and he deemed my two papers,\nreciprocal altruism and parental investment and sexual selection as “not being science” and dismissed me in one\nsentence. Well bless his soul, he now does not even understand his own subject—yes, 1 speak of genetics—\nbecause having remained resolutely ignorant of evolutionary logic and biology he can neither understand the\n\nshape and form of the genotype nor how it differs systematically within life\n\ni have been preparing something for you for a long time on human intelligence, Africa, parasites etc because 1\n\nprefer to get things right but i am ready to send you what i have\n\nmain focus is—Africans stupid or smart?\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023212.txt_11088
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023212.txt
subject: agenda
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <i iii"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "we need to coordinate. brad bank, cannot be clumsy\n\n1. brad orrichard. makes litte difference. 2. gagosian . no written contract??!! fishy to me - who transfers 100 million dollars overseas without a contract ,- dont want you pulled into a scandal. careful especially as he is on the tax dept radar,. 3. I would like you to delineate what you would like me to do - the more specificity the better.- I think it important to avoid any misunderstandings as to each of our obligations and responsbilities. I will always give you my best advice. I have made my views re ada and the office clear . no hedging. . THEY should go. no hesitation . no zeus, your choice obviously. good news - I will not bring it up again. moving forward- These transactions will require a great deal of manpower over the next holiday month, every document needs minute review. . I would like to fix our fee agreement , in detail no later than this weekend .ie amounts , dates paid . entities paid. any concept you may have of\" after care\"? all on the table. .other questions such as how much to leave your children ,in what form, has no right answer. but you and I can dialougue as long as you like about issues of judgement. it is out of o friendship. not biz. ( bill hellman as a trustee? ) . we can talk about that during walks etc . I would like for you and I to go back to having fun."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <9 >"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "25 minutes needed. 1 new and vastly improved plan, needs your thoughtful input. decisions on legacy paintings bronzes. books etc. 2. we need to reach fee agreement. and authorities.( alan and I spent time over the weekend, ) , hundred documents to be drafted. 3. gagosiaon 4 revolver .5 inspire - FBI. 6. Phaidon, solution. 7 plane. no need to reinvent the wheel. . ( rowen )."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <i’ ~"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Loan", "body": "Please talk to him"}, {"sender": "Alan S. Halperin", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Melanie Spinella", "Alan S. Halperin", "Ada Clapp", "Joc Avantaric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 24 November 2015", "subject": "Loan", "body": "Jeffrey-given the high daily interest cost (50k+/-) on $$ borrowed which you pointed out yesterday, here's what I'm thinking, but I want to be 100% on the same page as you:\n\n1. Close next monday on the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.)\n\n2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While probably not impt on a \"substantive\" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely good for leon.\n\n3. We are hoping to have signature pages to the trustees (and returned to us) by early to mid next week. (Ada will oversee.)\n\n4. We will then get the new trust to bofa who, moving quickly (according to them), will have an acct open the following week, 12/7-9.\n\n5. We need to manage execution of paperwork associated with decanting which I assume occurs once apo- ol and bank acct are operative. (Ada I'm sure you'll be on top of this)."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032777.txt_11089
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032777.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 22, 2018, at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good lord. A novella of rehashed crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 22, 2018, at 10:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sign of the times"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 3:13:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Small update when you have a second."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033482.txt_11090
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033482.txt
subject: Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 5:26:12 AM", "subject": "Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short", "body": "Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short\n\nDear Donald Trump: China, Japan and Mexico are not “killing us”\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Thursday, September 17, 2015\n\nDonald Trump’s presidential bid is centered on the promise of his personal talents. He says he’s the “most successful\nperson ever to run for the presidency, by far.” (George Washington and Dwight Eisenhower, sit down!) But if there is an\nidea animating his candidacy, it is that the United States is being badly beaten by its economic competitors. In his speech\non foreign policy this week, Trump explained that America is being bested by countries such as China, Japan and Mexico\nbecause their leaders are “smarter, more cunning and sharper than our leaders.” “They’re killing us,” he often says.\n\nThis is an odd moment to make these charges because the reality is almost entirely the opposite. The United States is\nmore dominant on the global economic landscape than at any point since the heyday of Bill Clinton’s presidency —\nperhaps even more so.\n\nLast quarter, the U.S. economy grew at a 3.7 percent clip. Annual growth now is almost twice that of Europe and four\ntimes that of Japan. Unemployment is at 5.1 percent, the lowest in seven years. The deficit as a percentage of gross\ndomestic product (2.8 percent in 2014) is at its lowest since 2007.\n\n“The U.S. has come out of the 2008 crisis better than all the others,” says Ruchir Sharma, head of global macro investing\nat Morgan Stanley. “Americans have reduced their debt burden more than the Europeans, while China’s debt has\nskyrocketed to extremely dangerous levels. If you look outside of China, U.S. growth is actually faster even than the\nemerging markets. Since the 2008 crisis, U.S. equity markets have outperformed all others — in fact 9 out of the 10 most\nvaluable companies in the world are now American. The dollar is the currency of choice. Global growth is not what it\nused to be, but in a bad neighborhood, the U.S. has the best house by far.” Sharma points out that for the past four\nyears, the United States’ share of global GDP has increased while Europe’s and Japan’s have moved down.\n\nWhen | was in Europe last week, businessmen there were concerned with what they saw as a new level of U.S.\ndominance in everything from technology to entertainment to finance. Consider America’s big banks. They were at the\nepicenter of the financial crisis and were badly battered by it. Since then, bankers have complained that they’ve faced\nuncertainty about government policies, overzealous regulators trying to compensate for their laxness before the crisis\nand the unwieldy burdens of the Dodd-Frank law.\n\nWell, U.S. banks today are more dominant than ever. The Wall Street Journal notes that in the past five years, JPMorgan\nChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have increased in value by $254.6 billion. In the\nsame period, their European competitors, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS and Royal Bank of Scotland added\njust $9.5 billion. In July, Barclays Chairman John McFarlane was asked if America’s banks were eating European lenders’\nlunch. He replied: “They are doing a good job of it.” He added that the U.S. banks “are the only ones that really claim to\nbe global and successful.”"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032944.txt_11091
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032944.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Ton"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 3:58:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, any word on karyyna plans. . can you belive MBS sent mea TENT carpets and all."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom [unknown]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he’s the real deal.\ntip"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tor"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "??"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031383.txt_11097
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031383.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["J Jep jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/2/2011 2:15:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did you have a chance to look at the potential idea of having people fulfill there contract with Sunrise? Just want to know what you think as this is something you know well..as it says int he article the only thing that you don’t get a pass on is poverty.."}, {"sender": "J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/2/11 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026827.txt_11099
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026827.txt
subject: Terrorism - Metrojet and Paris Mark Externalization of ISIS Threat
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kevin Neater", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 14, 2015", "subject": "Terrorism - Metrojet and Paris Mark Externalization of ISIS Threat", "body": "It has been a consensus view in the US and Europe that the dangers posed by ISIS included metastasizing into other Middle Eastern and African countries -- something that Turkey has already experienced and Saudi Arabia and others likely face. Europe was believed to be at less risk, although as the flow of refugees from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan increased, that risk has risen. \n\nThe US and everywhere else were thought to be tertiary targets, subject to opportunistic attacks but almost a distraction to ISIS (cf. Al Qaeda), given its preoccupation with exploitation of Sunni/Shia divisions and goal of regional territorial gains. Remember, ISIS' military leadership largely is drawn from Sunnis who were a part of Saddam's military; they are motivated by revenge for how they have been treated by the Shia-dominated post- Saddam Iraqi government.)\n\nLast week's Metrojet bombing in Egypt, the suicide attacks Thursday in a Shiite neighborhood of Beirut, and yesterday atrocities in Paris all demonstrate an unexpected level of sophistication and effort. As a result, European countries and the US are likely to see an increase in incidents and threats that harken back to Al Qaeda's early agenda or are comparable to the Black September and early Hezbollah attacks of the '70s. \n\nWhat are the consequences? \n• ISIS can be expected to undertake further spectacular attacks. It has eclipsed AQ in operational capability, financing, and recruitment. It is not only the wealthiest terror group in history, but one with global reach and ambitions. (The Obama Administration's claims that ISIS is contained now look naive, and that characterization will haunt President Obama and Democrats next year.)\n• Expect a significant uptick in ELI, US, and Russian engagement against ISIS in the Iraq/Syria theater, but also in Europe. The failure to detect this elaborate scheme (no less complex because it was \"low tech\" -- so was 9/11) will prompt European security and intelligence agencies to take a much more intrusive and perhaps even confrontational approach both to indigenous Muslim groups and to arriving refugees. While that risks a feed-back loop, the instinct will be to err on the side of immediate results, not impact on radicalization as a social challenge.\n• Germany and other ELI nations will have to re-examine their commitments to welcome more refugees from the Middle East, and British opposition to allowing refugees, already strong, will harden. The scale of the Paris attacks will energize right-wing politics and pressure center-left governments to make threat reduction a higher priority than humanitarian concerns.\n\n• The universal horror at what happened in Paris is likely to strengthen the determination of countries gathered in Vienna for the Syria conference to better coordinate and prosecute the campaign against ISIS in Syria and Ira.\n\nBottom Line: Has risk to the United States increased? There are no indications yet that ISIS has changed its approach here. It encourages radicalization and lone wolf attacks but has not mounted direct attacks. But the Metrojet bombing has resulted in a stepped up global effort to secure American airlines. So too, targeting of American institutions/events — it is unlikely a coincidence that an American band was playing at the site of the largest casualities in Paris -- seems highly probable. This applies equally to American bases and facilities overseas, including embassies."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022695.txt_11121
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022695.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/31/2015 2:46:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well, I think, but not because of me. The existential crisis thing is not a PMS or menopausal pose."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 9:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how did musk call go?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 2:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 12:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ce\n\nPlenty Of Innuendo, But No Hard Evidence Of New\nClinton Sex Scandal\n\nMuch-discussed documents in Jeffrey Epstein affair don’t live up to the hype.\n\nKen Bensinger\n\nBuzzFeed News Reporter"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt_11124
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf . or just give your talking points. allowances . commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i understand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmle", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:21:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt_11125
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/17/2016 1:53:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My Extraordinarily Talented, Outrageous Friend,\n\nThank you for asking how Iam doing. The short answer is very well. I hope that you are in good health and\ncontinue to use your special talents to make the world a better place and for your somewhat unique\namusements.\n\nThe longer answer to your question is that at the end of 2014 I closed down the office of Landmark, transferred\nall of the assets to pay all of the major creditors, except me, and found myself as broke as I was when you first\ncalled me that Friday after Thanksgiving, with my only remaining assets, a large capital loss, my reputation, and\nmy energy.\n\nSince then, our luck has been better than even an optimist like me would expect. Being free of the $500,000 a\nday I was fined by the OTS, after several years they abandoned this fine, which was initiated strictly to ensure\nthat I had no opportunity to finance any new developments, I became involved with an extraordinary, large,\nimportant real estate development in Oklahoma City and two others in the D.C. area.\n\nThe bad news is that my dear friend and good partner, Aubrey McClendon, was killed in a single car accident\non March 2\" of this year and the development with great potential is now either delayed or abandoned. The\ngood news is that our involvement in a 1,000 acre development on Deep Creek Lake in western Maryland is in\nthe process of being financed and should be underway sometime this summer. Our second project is a 405 acre\ndevelopment in Harper’s Ferry, West Virginia, that is probably the prettiest piece of property I know of in the\nU.S. that is zoned and developable. Its business plan is now underway and we should be in the financing mode\nthis fall. My impression is that there is a tremendous amount of money on the sidelines, but the top 5% or 10%\nthat control it are terribly frightened of losing money they don’t need, while the 90% to 95% of the citizens are\ncontinuing their daily labors somewhat frightened that they are not certain where next month’s or next year’s\nmortgage payment is coming from.\n\nOn a lighter note, Donald Trump recently bought our development in Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been\nrated the first or second best resort in Europe. To-date, to my surprise, he is managing it reasonably well,\nprobably because he is presently devoted to an endeavor that amuses him.\n\nJeffrey, I want you to understand that I am extremely pleased and not at all melancholy about my present\ncircumstances. Whenever I get an opportunity, I always visit those assets I helped create and almost without\nexception, I wish I had been smarter, but generally satisfied that I made a positive contribution and one much\nhigher than normally done by my competitors, because I am fortunate that the labor focus of my life has not\nattracted the best and the brightest.\n\nWhen good fortune brings you to the D.C. area, please let me know. I always enjoy understanding your\nactivities and do so with amazement and amusement."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt_11133
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:40:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031039.txt_11135
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031039.txt
subject: Re: A few questions just in case please?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 1:07:51 AM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to\nknow. ? is obama good for the country, .? israel? . if you could live one day of your lives over again, what\nwould it be?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032788.txt_11136
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032788.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried u. Am at 6178179452"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "just tried"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/18/2018 12:51:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried back. Now here"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033496.txt_11137
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033496.txt
subject: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": "Guy Amico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh", "ugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:16 pm", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Photos", "body": "can you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer,\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033076.txt_11141
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033076.txt
subject: Re: What's up in trump World?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "3/7/2018 11:49:41 AM", "subject": "Re: What's up in trump World?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:51 AM", "subject": "Re: What's up in trump World?", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nPlease direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:\nFollow me on twitter glhsummers\nwww.larrysummers.com"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031011.txt_11144
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031011.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, To)"], "timestamp": "6/14/2010 8:18:52 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Unknown [unknown]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:", "Steven Elkman/db/dbcom@DBAmericas"], "timestamp": "Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Fw: [Perl-Cousins] Fw: Nobody knows nobody in Chicago", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031011"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029565.txt_11159
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029565.txt
subject: Re: you and Chapman
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert Trivers"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 7:45:38 PM", "subject": "Re: you and Chapman", "body": "Nice"}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:36 PM", "subject": "Re: you and Chapman", "body": "attached a message i just sent to President Struppa of Chapman—i am certain that your gift will do the trick—\n\nand that the West Coast is indeed more convivial and supportive than the East\n\ni hope i did not f... up your contact with Finkelstein\n\nCarlos told me of the devastation to your island—pretty much as i feared\n\nam amused (at a safe distance) as Bannon takes on Trump—he responds as he always does, threatening a suit\n\nhe will not in fact file\n\nno internet in my home or nearby in the great, retarded country of Jamaica so 1 am now at a restaurant some 35\n\nminutes away and only go on-line twice a day—hoping that i will work instead\n\nall best"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031005.txt_11168
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031005.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George [rush.george@nydailynews.com]", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Just woke up to find this from Howard. A going to canyons today, so not sure about phone reception."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mortimer Zuckerman"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:19:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021806.txt_11170
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021806.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 3, 2015 12:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why is the press calling me?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2015, at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "prince andrew under fire. ignore."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why now? Something new?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2015, at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is detailing her version of my many parties, clinton on the island dershowitz having sex with her. . all fantasy but the press love it."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 3, 2015 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I loved Alan's response..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033062.txt_11171
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033062.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Finally got the apartment so can \"move in\" tomorrow."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018 6:17:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029282.txt_11174
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029282.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman", "Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "3/16/2017 11:26:44 AM", "subject": null, "body": "a HUGE donor advised fund is an elegant solution to the cuts trump proposes to what some consider critical programs. you could organzie a huge public charity that would continue the work of many worthwhile orgs. not my thing but structurally beautiful. its the wealthiest now stepping into a quasi govt funding. national endowment for arts. climate science. as extraordinary amounts of wealth have moved into private hands. elons and jeff space goals should be mirrored with many other former govt ones. hope to see you soon"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029203.txt_11175
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029203.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 30, 2018, at 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "george church and i having lunch at my istittue at harvard sunday. join.?\n\n in this communication is\nconfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may\nconstitute inside information, and is intended only for\nthe use of the addressee. It is the property of\nJEE\nUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this\ncommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited\nand may be unlawful. If you have received this\ncommunication in error, please notify us immediately by\nreturn e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and\ndestroy this communication and all copies thereof,\nincluding all attachments. \n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029203"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/30/2018 3:32:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m getting there v late on Sunday\nHave filming for Al Gore before\nSee my text re Monday ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033125.txt_11185
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033125.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Rei"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 11:29:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how unfair yes, it was written by financial illiterates. . referencing \" todays dollars? with no back up. IRS looked at all. .they ignored taxes paid along the way. . they didnt understand the rules.. Im nota supporter but this is nothing but a hit job."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt_11194
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt
subject: Re: off the record
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes __and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose? But you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:24:30 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "on phone now -- will call when i am done"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt_11198
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky <noam@chomsky.mit.edu>", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\nLawrence\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist., his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 6:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "or we can visit him on his"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023038.txt_11200
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023038.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:56 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 11:46:49 2011", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Hey there! What's all this? I don't know anything about this! You must SAY so please. This has NOTHING to do with me.\nI can't take any more of this."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt_11205
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:23:25 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Lawrance Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "this may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this. \nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with \nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031624.txt_11206
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031624.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed. and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market, more like custodian than investor."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:48:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018893.txt_11212
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018893.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM, 07/24/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": "s. . _", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM, 07/24/2006", "body": "It is requested by SAL ——C | that the above captioned case be opened and assigned."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030680.txt_11227
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030680.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal’s office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year’s ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn’t be more thrilled with this year’s impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn’t be more"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Steven Pfeiffer", "Rich Kahn", "Joana Vicente"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:31 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards. Chairs from Jeffrey Epstein OK.", "body": "Jeffrey; every year I beg you to come and every year you don't. I will sit with you this year. If you bail, please let me know ASAP. You will have four seats with me. Xoxo peggy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028486.txt_11244
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028486.txt
subject: Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 1:34:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nBill Clinton 1994.\n\nFood for thought.\n\nEB\n\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026111.txt_11245
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026111.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029968.txt_11258
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029968.txt
subject: Tom McMillen
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/22/2013 10:45:31 PM", "subject": "Tom McMillen", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nI saw Tom McMillen last night and he asked about you - said he lost touch. He's tight with the Obama's and is going to be\nan Ambassador - apparently any country he wants. So great! I'd LOVE to be an Ambassador and am going attempt to\nraise enough money on the next election cycle.\n\nHis info is: and GEE I hesitate to give him your info w/out ur permission...\n\nAm doing Aspen Institute Socrates Society program over President's weekend if you're in Aspen! Miss you!\nLove and Happiness, Gwendolyn\n\nPS. Have a conference call with Jessica Joffe tomorrow.\n\nwww.beckresearchlabs.com\nwww.flirtingwithfinances.com\n\ncheck out: www.webegirls.com"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030506.txt_11261
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030506.txt
subject: Re: Quick question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 02:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "He couldn't for a few months , too hot \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc, \nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the \ngovernment in general, etc? \nSent via BlackBerry from T- Mobile"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031618.txt_11262
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031618.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "5/16/2016 3:41:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <11.11@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, 16 May 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am kind of shocked that our reporters did not contact you re the Trump/women story. Seems to me he got off rather lightly.\n\nHow are you doing?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032575.txt_11271
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032575.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "{nn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:15:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he just did© it seems i will be in new york from sep 14 until 20 .. if you happen to be there let me know it will\nbe great to see you .. if not, i will have a bag dilevered to your house with some souvenirs from kuwaithia"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030512.txt_11278
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030512.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 4:42:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:18 AM", "subject": "FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\nI can best be reached via my cell phone -\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty\nKirsty MacKenzie,\nInterviews Editor,\nToday Programme,\nBBC News\n- or this email address."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032803.txt_11284
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032803.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "Neal Kassel", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 12:46:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks Melanie \nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish Melanie was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the 25th \nthrough Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available. \nBe well."}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal \nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke - \nDonald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pine introduced \nus ... \nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month. \nI think you would both enjoy spending time together - \nThanks to you both for always supporting me. \nYou are both copied."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt_11292
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remember She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2, were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8. answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with• AndMworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much. Does franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "that is old news -- buy dollar and take a nap? Kind of like buying Apple?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031549.txt_11297
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031549.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Acela...type it or wait till | get to a quiet place"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch . He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 8:42:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When?...(did you ask him after or before he got his grand jury subpoena?)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt_11325
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029983.txt
subject: RE: ICYMI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "ICYMI\n\nMy occasional roundup of interesting links and\nwriting I've shared - in case you missed them. :)\n\nNew and Notable\n\n* we are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock Partners. LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93868&i d=fd2b3c4c94&e=5c5da67d46>\n\n* And also very excited to welcome lynda.com<http://lynda.com> to the LinkedIn team!\nLINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8f199d93868&i d=c5d4aeaddb&e=5c5da67d46>\n\n*  change.org celebrates its 100 million users milestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO\nBen Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage.com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8f199d9386&i d=1lcecbh3c616&e=5c5da67d46>\n\n* Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@work, a new civic enterprise aimed at “rewiring the U.S. labor\nmarket.\" Tom Friedman's post: LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanagel.com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8F199d9 38681 d=5656e94c3e&e=5c5dab67d46>\n\n* Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer online coding camp using Minecraft.\nLINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 868i d=fa8cele400&e=5c5da67d46>\n\nworthwhile Reads\n\n* Jeff Weiner: How LinkedIn is Helping Power the President's Tech Jobs Initiative\nLINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanagel.com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8F199d9 38681 d=604ec30797&e=5c5dab67d46>\n\n* The New Yorker: R U There? - Nancy Lublin and Crisis Text Line LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d9386&i d=0e06052ca2&e=5c5da67d46>\n\nia Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 8681 d=99ca65 F63c&e=5c5dab67d46>\n\n* Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined Infrastructure LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage2.com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8F199d93868i d=266fd91F7c&e=5c5dab67d46>\n\n* Sheryl Sandberg's powerful tribute to Dave Goldberg. LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 8681 d=9e42d166b8&e=5 c5da67d46>\n\nSome of My Recent Essays\n\n* Wired: why the block chain matters LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage.com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 868i d=13d941la4df&e=5c5da67d46>\n\n* Financial Times: Acquiring proven entrepreneurs is a smart way to innovate\nLINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 868i d=87d9caa3fO&e=5c5da67d46>\n\n* Press Start to Continue: One More Role of Founders LINK<http://reidhoffman.us7.list-\nmanage. com/track/click?u=3a27d4e452178cc8fF199d93 86871 d=30298b2c77&e=5c5dab67d46>\n\nTo Watch"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "Sunday, July 05, 2015 2:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2015 5:04:31 PM", "subject": "RE: ICYMI", "body": "slow progress.\nplanning to see you in August.\n\nHope you're well."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt_11327
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know...I just saw that and almost threw up....also have to decide today whether or not to take flynn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 11:51:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Would be conflicted out of everything to come"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031195.txt_11328
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031195.txt
subject:
  Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Brad Edwards"], "timestamp": "January 27, 2016 at 11:57:38 AM EST", "subject": "ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": "HI BRAD\nPLEASE CONSIDER WISDOM IN THE YEARS OF LITIGATION AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN .\n1 ST THOMAS HAS THE MAJOR BENEFIT BY THE ATTACHMENT OF ALL THE JEFF EPST EIN & CLIENTS ASSETS IN THE EPSTEIN OPERATIONS ON ST THOMAS.\n2 EPSTEIN IS NOW THE COLLECTION PROCEEDING UNDER THE FEDERAL & ST THOMAS LAW .\n3 EPSTEIN HAS THE WRONG PERSON AS THE ST THOMAS AGENT FOR EPSTEIN WHEREB Y THE EPSTEIN ST THOMAS AGENT IS THE WIFE OF THE FORMER HEAD OF ST THOMA S NOT THE PARTY PERSON FROM THE LEADERSHIP IN ST THOMAS.\n4 EPSTEIN BACKED THE PARTY IN ST THOMAS THAT DID NOT WIN THE ST THOMAS RA CE.\n5 ST THOMAS NEEDS MONEY THAT THE ATTACHMENT OF THE EPSTEIN ASSETS ON ST THOMAS WILL PROVIDE AT ONCE.\n6 BANKS LENDING EPSTEIN & CLIENTS ALL OF THE MONEY FOR TRADING THE MARGI N ACCOUNTS MUST PUT EPSTEIN et al INTO BANKRUPTCY ONCE ST THOMAS MOVES AGAINST EPSTEIN & ALL OF THE ASSE TS ON ST THOMAS THAT EPSTEIN WORKS WITH EVERY DAY.\n7 BRAD THE YEARS OF LITIGATION AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN ARE OVER WITH NO MAJOR COLLECTION FROM EPSTEIN IN THE PROCEEDINGS BRAD IS LITIGATING.\n8 BRAD CALL ATTORNEY ALAN FRAADE 212 486 2500 , TO JOIN THE ST THOMAS PROCE EDINGS AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN.\nTHANK YOU BRAD\nGO TRUMP !!!!!!!!"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 27, 2016 at 12:01:01 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/27/2016 5:02:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ST THOMAS CASE TOWERS INVESTORS VS JEFF EPSTEIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ST THOMAS ATTACHMENT OF ALL JEFF EPSTEIN ASSETS", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030643.txt_11333
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030643.txt
subject: Re: Ri did see this coming...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure\nout if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage\nmight offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes\ntrump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 7:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "How's that?\nWhich team you pulling for?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "And just had a great time with Joi.\nYou still in Paris?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Nov 13, 2016, at 9:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "trump tower"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 3:19:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Perfect\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt_11337
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt
subject: FW: Daily Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "GM AX", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 11 2011 12:54 AM", "subject": "FW: Daily Mail", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kevin Maxwell", "recipients": ["NY Max"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:11 -0500", "subject": "Fw: Daily Mail", "body": "Please see below. My take:A) voluntary rules are meaningless in terms of arranging for a cessation of crap articles/stories etcB) doesn't offer redress (financial or in terms of publicity.Law here definitely provides more protection and redress if individual(s) involved in approaches from newspapers are employees or have any form of contractual relationship with target.Let's talk. Kevinx"}, {"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["GMAX"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:29:24 +0000", "subject": "Re: Daily Mail", "body": "Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest.\n\nMaz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective.\n\nBelow is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted.\n\n15 Witness payments in criminal trials\n\ni) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981.\n\nThis prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has announced its verdict.\n\n*11) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033512.txt_11338
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033512.txt
subject: FW: epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jackie Perczek", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 4:57:42 PM", "subject": "FW: epstein", "body": "fyi"}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:57 PM", "subject": "epstein", "body": "Dear we have no comment on the trump story. We are finalizing our pleading regarding the plaintiff's position on remedies. I intend to hold off commenting until we file it. After that I will be free to comment on the pleading which will address your question."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029773.txt_11342
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029773.txt
subject: RE: Oscar diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephanie [rs", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal [jcevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2011 11:15:40 PM", "subject": "RE: Oscar diary", "body": "Jeffrey,\nPeggy's story is attached to the e-mail. I have included the story in the body of the e-mail as well.\nThanks,\n\nStephanie\n\nOmar Quadhafi is hunkering down in Tripoli giving press interviews denying that rebels are taking over\nEastern Libya. Oi] prices are shooting over one hundred dollars a barrel. The US government is on the\nverge of a shut down. These are not the top secret opening lines to Aaron Sorkin’s new script, but the\nglobal headlines of a world spinning out of control. I head to Los Angeles like an overdressed lemming to\nattend the 83rd Academy Awards and attempt to make sense of artists thrust into combat.\n\nFor the second year nearly 6,000 Academy members have nominated 10 films and the battle is down to two.\nThe beloved timeless classic, \"The King's Speech\" marches into the arena as the front runner, but\npassionate supporters of the brilliant edgier (and critics darling) \"The Social Network\" have not\nconceded. The ballots are counted, the party invites are out and still the feelings are raw. Filmmakers\nare exhausted from campaigning.\n\nAt Bryan Lourd's famous star studded party Sony Classics’ Co-President Michael Barker announces to me he\nhas taken a random sampling of voters in the room. He says, \"There will be a ‘Social Network’ upset at\nthe Kodak Theater.\" Shear panic radiates from my every pore as he says, \"I am joking.\" It's like color\nwar at summer camp.\n\nwoody Allen and George Lucas tell me they are no longer members of the Academy because pitting artists\nagainst each other to determine the quality of their work is insane. They are right.\n\nMy event and publicity company is considered \"Switzerland\" by the studios, as we help every filmmaker to\npresent and position his work. This year I am somewhat emotionally sucked in.\n\nIn 2005 I meet the unknown 32-year-old English director Tom Hooper on his first film for HBO,\"Elizabeth\nI\". The Emmy award winning movie stars Helen Mirren, who takes credit for discovering him directing\nEnglish television. Helen later wins her Oscar for portraying Queen Elizabeth in “The Queen”. Queen\nElizabeth is the daughter of King George VI portrayed by Oscar winner Colin Firth in “The King's Speech\".\n\nI also become Hooper's champion encouraging many to see his early work including his herculean 10 hour\nHBO mini-series \"John Adams\" produced by Tom Hanks.\n\nSix years later at the Telluride Film Festival Tom Hooper is bathing in the glory of a hysterical\nstanding ovation with Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush at the very first screening of \"The King's Speech.”\nSurprisingly, this drama's subtle humor gets big laughs leading up to its emotional ending.\n\nwithin two weeks, at The Toronto Film Festival, Harvey Weinstein is now standing with his filmmakers\nwitnessing the same reaction. The film wins The Audience Prize. Their strategy is to say nothing. Do\nnothing. They have a possible Oscar winner. Four out of five past Best Pictures have premiered in\nToronto.\n\ncut to New York City at the end of September. It's the opening night at The Film Society of Lincoln\nCenter. One of America’s most important and prolific producers Scott Rudin, along with Jesse Eisenberg,\nAndrew Garfield and Aaron Sorkin are in a brightly lit box waving down to their equally hysterical\naudience who have just seen \"The Social Network\".\n\nThe film opens the next day to rave reviews and endless publicity. David Fincher is off making “The Girl\nwith the Dragon Tattoo\". Aaron Sorkin becomes the face of the film and an immediate shoo-in for an Oscar.\n\nThe Hamptons International Film Festival in October suddenly becomes a launching pad for \"127 Hours\",\nwhere cool Yale/NYU student James Franco appears and receives a heroic standing ovation. More Oscar buzz.\n\n“Black Swan\" also unspools there in a tiny theater as Madonna, Alec Baldwin and even Harvey Weinstein\n\nslip in the back. Darren Aronofsky, sporting the ever present cool wool scarf around his neck is hailed a\ngenius. Natalie Portman is instantly the hot nominee for Best Actress."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031213.txt_11353
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031213.txt
subject: Program & Attendee list
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom <unknown>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2012 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI am sorry I did not call back yesterday - I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep as soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this is the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer - But he is a bit busy I gather!\n\nAnyway, hope J got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail about possibly coming here end of September - however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-raiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda and she is just super - if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\n\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\n\nLet me know what you think!\n\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there - our friend Goldsamt! First prize for perseverance!\n\nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful!\n\nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!\n\nKRAM\nBE"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is your wife choice this year?"}, {"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/21/2012 9:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "She is the one! Now SALSS 4 days...will get back to you next week...\n\nKram BE."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt_11355
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029015.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:34:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt_11356
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029094.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "• when i told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure that doing good was going to be the goal\n• https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F05%2F31%2Fus%2Fobama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ": - )"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033274.txt_11359
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033274.txt
subject: Alert - trump im palm
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 2:19:27 PM", "subject": "Alert - trump im palm", "body": "February 16, 2018 9:00 AM : trump im palm"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033260.txt_11364
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033260.txt
subject: Trump 'made comment about p**sy years before tape' I Daily Mail Online
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/30/2017 10:28:42 AM", "subject": "Trump 'made comment about p**sy years before tape' I Daily Mail Online", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5131173/Trump-comment-p-sy-years-tape.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031207.txt_11368
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031207.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 131 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenbero", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWwW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD\nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP\nWHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON\nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\n\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\n\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031561.txt_11369
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031561.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Just checking in to see how you are getting along these days. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going well\n\nTake care.\nDavid"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and iam committed to doing what i can to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the system breaks down.\n\nI assume you were just flipping the channels.\n\nHope you are doing well. I see they never miss an opportunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking how you missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention much of all you have been put through already. I hope the cases are all behind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you and your team decided on a different direction. Whatever works best.\n\njeevacation@gmail.com\n\njudge jeannie?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is itoverblown. ? all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. I recall many that told stories of how they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "B. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm, was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email investigation. Now how does that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy and I don't want that kind of character around. I also have an ineffective assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million earnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.\n\nC. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the EDNY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases, regularly threatened others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he knew it was a completely bogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved. He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama gave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY\n\nand on and on.\n\nI don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I certainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we have meddled in other countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bottom line is, if there is to be an investigation, just play it straight up. I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked him to head up the team, I would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radio (I never would have been asked), as I Know he would pick a team of honest folks from across the spectrum."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt_11378
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt
subject: Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayer a"], "timestamp": "9/22/2011 10:19:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "we will have dinnner at 8 ,, you can bring your maldives friend or anyone else. (no women ). we should\nspend an hour together just the two of us. today tomorrow:? It is always fun to see you"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt_11381
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt
subject: Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2018 4:59:21 PM", "subject": "Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/14/trump-to-name-larry-kudlow-as-gary-cohn-replacement.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029017.txt_11382
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029017.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good\nSee you this Sat 230 PM ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:30:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029096.txt_11384
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when i told reid that obama just wanted to make money, he thought i was being cynical, as he was sure \nthat doing good was going to be the goal \n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/us/obama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F05%2F31%2Fus%2Fobama-buys-house-washington-kalorama.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ":-)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did you talk to reid about the donor advised fund?"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not yet. I will when I talk to him next - but not sure when that is. \n\nBTW, should be expecting funding yet or after we figure out the pitch?\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2017 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i need to edit and hand. sorry, i will try to get to it this weekend. soo swamped here. its so much fun."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/1/2017 12:37:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks\n(Tip: Use NRR to mean No Reply Required - thank you!)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025874.txt_11387
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025874.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/22/2015 2:48:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Understood"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, the govt opposed her joining, nothing more. the only thing that can be proven, is that her story re clinton is totlaly nade up, he was never ever there and the press shoudl be challenged to prove it. secret service records as wlell as local virgin isalds support will clearly prove he was never there, she detailed how he arrived,\" black heli flown by ghislane . LIES sitting on my left lies, all bulshit and as it is the only non he said she said argument i think it should be stressed"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you confirm Doe 3 has been thrown out of the case against the US gov to reopen ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024923.txt_11406
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024923.txt
subject: rather long and a few typos
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner [ie", "recipients": ["George Krassner", "nick kazan", "Vrisman02", "Rebecca Risman", "indaW. Grossman"], "timestamp": "5/15/2019 12:17:32 AM", "subject": "rather long and a few typos", "body": "REMEMBERING CAVALIER MAGAZINE\nLAUNCHING A MAGAZINE\n\nMy friend Michael Simmons, who has been the editor of National Lampoon and High\nTimes, observes that Cavalier hired fine scribes. A few examples: Thomas Pynchon, Philip Roth,\nWilliam Saroyman, Isaac Asimov, Theodore Sturgeon. Cavalier was launched by Fawcett\n\nPublications in 1952.\n\nMen’s magazine Cavalier (motto: “For the American Male”) was published the year\nbefore Playboy to whom it has often been compared, and back in the day tried to be seen as\nslightly hipper, more youthful and considered a bit more clever than its big name rival. Almost\nan anti-establishment Playboy. A slogan stated: “Your dad bought Playboy, you\n\nbought Cavalier.”\nI BECAME A COLUMNIST\n\nI was invited to write a column, named “The Naked Emperor,” for Cavalier, that was beginning\nto publish underground writers and artists. They paid me $1,000 a month. My first column was a\nreport on an auction of two-inch squares from the hotel bedsheets slept on by the Beatles during\n\ntheir first trip to America.\n\nThere were 300 screaming young girls, off on a fetishist’s holiday. Obviously, there wouldn’t be\nenough items to go around, but it was announced that the Beatles’ unwashed towels and bed\nlinens were to be cut into two-inch squares and sold for $1 each. The price included a notarized\n\nstatement of authenticity."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt_11408
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt
subject: Re: Jed Rubenfeld
messages:
  [{"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Good morning!\n\nJed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend’s unhappy situation? Ifso, happy to make the connection.\n\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Can you talk? Impt. PF"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above the law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely to give king like powers to a president. on one above the law. I would like lunch pail joe to come away and think , this guy is smart .I understood. lets see what he writes about the clintons.\n\nsomeone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose a vote. that is true , but would make little sense for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the allowed civil depo setting precedent for criminal process , is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down, again , and suggesting that you can sue your neighbor , even if you neighbor is the president. makes little sense that the you can be indicted for assaulting him but he cannot ifhe assaults you. low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . at some point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you were that the clinton and betty curries' trashcan story , was reopened. ."}, {"sender": "Starr, Ker i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 7:17:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Wise counsel. Thx!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt_11412
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt
subject: Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/5/2017 12:02:43 PM", "subject": "Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029003.txt_11414
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029003.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["q"], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans. all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a bad movie. president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra , again, sunday , I know you moved krause to tonight. ."}, {"sender": "q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as IJ didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Soon-Yi"], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": "se", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 12:04:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026399.txt_11421
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026399.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "thank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail.\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as always very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like conceding anything on the conceptual one)."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 4:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "no worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 -\nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch\nor other method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer\ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for\nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would\nget dfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time,\nand structure of interactions. .\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of\nthose layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments\nbest describe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\"\ndeveloped\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a\nrecapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little\ndevelopment. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process.\nre taboo\n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly\na good thing for the species\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense\nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if\nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought?\nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\nVariation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average\nbrain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. .\nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, the\norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used\nas signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridination of indiv\nbrains. =\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are\nall math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its\nnot emotinal for me.\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent\nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 10:20:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt_11422
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 7:51:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029914.txt_11425
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029914.txt
subject: This is business develpt to diagnose illness
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Greenberg", "recipients": ["Ben and Lord Mandelson"], "timestamp": "16 November 2010 18:34", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": "My late reply does no justice to my enthusiasm to follow up on our previous call and to your interest in the same. Apologies.\n\nA word of explanation about the past two weeks:\n\n• Financing:\nAm in the midst of a $8-10 mn financing\nIn past two weeks have met potential investors in Toronto, Vancouver, DC, NYC, and Boston.\nHave in this time already closed approximately $2 mn, which is encouraging\nThis pace will continue for another month or so until the financing is fully closed.\n\n• US DoD:\nLast week several of us took our prototype device to be demonstrated for the US military's Walter Reed Army Institute of\nResearch (WRAIR).\nAt the conclusion of a four-hour session our host, Colonel Colin Ohrt, MD, who is in charge of the relevant WRAIR program,\ncalled our device a game-changer. He would like to pilot our device in Tanzania, Cambodia, Kenya, and Thailand. Follow up is\nbeing arranged.\nColonel Ohrt also separately evaluated our white paper on malaria elimination and expressed strong interest in also pursuing this\nproject with Fio.\nAccompanying Fio for these meetings was General Richard Tubb, MD (retired last year from the US Air Force). Dick was Chief\nof the White House Medical Unit and physician to Presidents Clinton and Bush.\n\n• USAID\nAlso last week we successfully demonstrated our device for USAID and the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI). Follow up is\nbeing arranged.\nAccompanying Fio for these meetings was Andrew Natsios, former head of USAID.\n\nFor all the foregoing meetings our prototype device performed well. Exciting times.\n\nMy trip to London has yet to be arranged and is dependent on financing events. In the meantime, I will happily travel to meet you\nin NYC.\n\nAttached is the White Paper on Malaria Elimination which Fio had written and invited several academic partners to join. Since the\ntime the document was first drafted, we discovered an even simpler technical strategy based on our new prototype device and\nreinforced by our recent discussion with WRAIR. This simplification would result in field trials as early as next year, which is\nmuch sooner than in the attached White Paper. To accomplish this we would team up with WRAIR rather than some of the current\nacademic partners in the paper."}, {"sender": "Benjamin Wegg-Prosser", "recipients": ["Michael Greenberg"], "timestamp": "November-08-10 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: GoToMeeting Invitation - Meet Now", "body": "Hi Michael\nJust wondered if you had an update on things, we are keen to hear more.\nBest\nBen"}, {"sender": "Michael Greenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "27 October 2010 06:54", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": "It was great to speak with you both. Am eager to follow up on all fronts mentioned. In transit since we spoke\n- will reply more fully tomorrow.\nBest wishes,\nMichael"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Wegg-Prosser", "recipients": ["Michael Greenberg"], "timestamp": "Mon Oct 25 10:35:12 2010", "subject": "Re: GoToMeeting Invitation - Meet Now", "body": "Michael,\nThanks for your time on Friday, it was great to hear more about FIO, we are keen to hear more.\n\nIn terms of follow up\n- we look forward to receiving the White Paper that you mentioned.\n- we will consider opportunities in Russia, principally via Rusnano, who we are in discussions\nwith http://www.rusnano.com/Home.aspx?dummy=634236281106041875\n- you asked about Onexim, this is the principal investment vehicle for Prokhorov (think New Jersey\nNets). He's reckoned to be the wealthiest man in Russia post-crisis. He is investing more in nanotech and\ngreen energy projects.\n\n- London meeting - please let us know dates when you might be coming through Europe.\n- NY meeting - we will update when we know more about plans to come to New York as we could also aim\nto meet there.\n\nLet's keep in touch and see where we get.\nBest\nBen"}, {"sender": "Michael Greenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 October 2010 20:08", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": "Hello:\nIf you would kindly click to this URL: https://wwwl.gotomeeting.com/join/526754137\nand follow the instructions, you will be able to view my laptop screen, on which I will be able to show\nyou our corporate presentation.\nSincerely,\nMichael Greenberg\nCEO, Fio Corporation"}, {"sender": "PETER MANDELSON", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/22/2011 3:00:54 PM", "subject": "This is business develpt to diagnose illness", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt_11428
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex ). . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with M. AndMworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much. Does franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "that is old news -- buy dollar and take a nap? Kind of like buying Apple?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/16/2015 8:12:46 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "yes, but not if you own dollars. bitcoin collapse pound is the most overvalued of all' but its a tax haven. norwegina kroner weak. sfr ,dollar. only thing to own"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt_11430
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume no dinner"}, {"sender": "Michael Wol [rr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt_11440
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt
subject: Ri did see this coming...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Ri did see this coming...", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?\nHow are you?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 7:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "How's that?\nWhich team you pulling for?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 1:53:35 PM", "subject": "Ri did see this coming...", "body": "And just had a great time with Joi.\nYou still in Paris?\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt_11447
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:18:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032056.txt_11449
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032056.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 8:17:01 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I know...I just saw that and almost threw up....also have to decide today whether or not to take flynn"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029981.txt_11452
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029981.txt
subject: Re: Studio
messages:
  [{"sender": "qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "Hi! Last night we confirmed a studio recording with an stunning soprano to record a new aria Fred wrote. Its early 7:30-9pm on April 4. F really wants to see you, so is after that too late? Wanna join us somewhere to eat after? Wanna come to the studio? Fred will be playing the piano for the demo. Otherwise, we could have a visit anytime you want after the 4th. But if you can, the studio would be fun and I would love to have your input in the booth:). Tora and Miasha might come too. Its an awesome aria sung by a Vampiress who looks just like (better) Vanessa Williams from our day. ( The Miss USA that somehow had some haha nudie photos floating around). ANYWAY ..what do ya think?\n\nSent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["5"], "timestamp": "Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:41:30 +0100", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "come afterward , i have interesting people. ehud barak, mandelson, zucekrman"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2013 12:54:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Studio", "body": "Barak Obama?\n\nSent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt_11458
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "{aE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 4:30:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt_11459
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt
subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["nancy dah!", "Lawrence Kraus [i"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:53:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft:\n\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements\non your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor\nstudents, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your\nreporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known\nindividuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to\nmore scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and\nallegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have\nremained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer\nor an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the\nfact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3\nmeetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally\nappreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your\nreport is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of\nyour ‘miscellaneous facts’, as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than\nallegations and innuendo. J also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other\norganizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my\ncontributions and my actions.\n\nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in\n2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be\nappropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an\nanonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in\nany university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn’t want to go out to a\nbar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don’t do that. Re incident\n5: The ‘female companion’ in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is\nwhat I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\n\nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\n\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came\nto me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was\ndifferent than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school,\nbut she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since\nshe was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult\nfor her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had\nasked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have\ngone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I\nusually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee\nwith her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch\nme do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt_11464
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt
subject: Questions for article
messages:
  [{"sender": "CSC", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 5:22:16 AM", "subject": "Questions for article", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHuffington Post is almost done with their article. They need couple answers to use them for your quotes. Please\nsee below.\n\nQuestions for you:\n\n1. As aresult of Trump's budget cuts, more scientists are turning to private donors for funds. How have you\nhelped these scientists thrive during this time in particular?\n\n2. Why do you think it’s important to have funded the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics and how will this\nprogram help us in the future?\n\nQuestions for a scientist (can I ask Martin to answer and quote him)?\n1. How has Jeffery Epstein’s donations helped you advance your research?\n\nLet me know if you have any questions or comments. Would appreciate speedy response.\n\nThank you!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019219.txt_11473
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019219.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2017, at 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "worse in real life and upclose.\n\nTrump is so gross."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hard to imagine. He really does remind me of mcgyver and I am suffering ptsd."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 11, 2017, at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if hes meguyver. are you marla maples?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/11/2017 1:37:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No, I ranked much much lower"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt_11491
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt
subject: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:19:56 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!! \nhttps://bossip.com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-her-pornographic-pleasure-pocket-43081/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026372.txt_11496
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026372.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Meaning I win the bet that I will never receive an apology and acknowledgment of acceptance of responsibility?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i could never ever verify its authenticity. so- yes ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 23, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will just say I told you so. Not to sound overly dramatic, but he is very close to being a psychopath -- he has no conscience. It's scary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Jan 23, 2016, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was wrong"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He obviously said something to you yesterday that was disturbing, and you don't want to tell me. Just tell me -- I can take it. I promise."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 23, 2016, at 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My memory is a friend killer - I stopped talking to clinton when he swore, with whole hearted conviction to me , that he had done something„ he had forgotten that he also swore the exact opposite to me only weeks before. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Macgyver takes it to another level because if you call him out on it, he will explain with a straight face that both statements are true."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "1/23/2016 3:40:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "with conviction"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt_11498
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt
subject: from revival, a new book..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 15 2010 07:13 PM", "subject": "from revival, a new book..", "body": "I thought you might find this amusing. \"But more often then not, the team of economic advisers was \noperating from different playbooks, with Summers calling his plays the loudest. Take, for instance, the debate \nthat surrounded the Volcker rule -- the regulatory reform component that curtailed proprietary trading at U.S. \nbanks and limited their investments in private equity firms and hedge funds. As Wolffe reports: \n[Summers'] doubts sat there in the West Wing, blocking the Volcker rule for months. Obama had \nsignaled that he wanted the rule to move forward back in October. The banks were on safe ground again, \nbut could still benefit from subsidized lending by the federal government. That seemed wrong when they \ncould use the money to trade for themselves rather than lend it to customers in the real economy... Biden \nwas an old friend of Volcker 's and started to press for the rule to take force. But as the weeks dragged on, \nSummers rehashed his same old questions and concerns. At one fall meeting with his economics team in \nthe Oval Office, Obama wanted to know why nothing had moved yet. Summers dug in once again, while \nGeithner - whose media coverage cast him as a supposed ally of Wall Street - wanted to push ahead. \nObama noted dryly, \"I think I can argue everyone's position now. \""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt_11506
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 1:29:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you think you will be in new york?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt_11510
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt
subject: Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg \nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. \nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about \nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump? \nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week? \nThanks for your consideration. \nInvestigative Reporter, \nFoxNews.com  \n2044 Armacost Avenue \nLos Angeles, CA 90025"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt_11511
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt
subject: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/10/2018 12:23:04 PM", "subject": "Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "It Begins"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt_11531
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great.\nIm thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers. no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which i believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times . two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:32:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt_11533
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it legs--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself What I'd like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think about it."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigative journalism so does your suggested pr group have the better contacts to place a story. on why it is not. . howeer to you point, to what end?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't tweet this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution. sex for money. . a state crime. with state laws."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "At this point I don't think you can go legalistic. They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im aware. im thinking what would trump do"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:53 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He never tries to explain. He denies, blames media, denigrates someone else."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Claims are ludicrous and self-serving, media is working with the other side's lawyers, this is all about Donald Trump."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/1/2018 3:57:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "...all about Donald Trump, the real villain."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026107.txt_11537
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026107.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026428.txt_11544
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026428.txt
subject: Fwd: Ref. : TR:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:46:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Ref. : TR:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jean HUGUEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Ref. : TR:", "body": "Dear jeffrey \n\nFrom our side we could postponed the trip ,visit the 2 works from Plant Thursday the 15th and have our \nmeeting Friday the 16th all of us,but need an answer from Plant. \nPlease tell me if it is convenient for you Friday the 16th,or Thurday late afternoon \nThanks\njean"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "lundi 28 novembre 2016 01:23", "subject": "Fwd: Ref. : TR:", "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121.txt_11552
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by firms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\nOf gross ignorance surely\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship as a source, . thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM -0400", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "prospectus"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 3:08:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "??"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt_11557
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:51:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and\nimportant?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness\nof understandings."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound\ntheir silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same\nyear ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023550.txt_11559
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023550.txt
subject: a JokeLand E-Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "JokeLand", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/9/2015 7:17:32 PM", "subject": "a JokeLand E-Mail", "body": "A guy's walking down the boardwalk in Atlantic City and he runs into a hooker. He says, \"How much?\" She says \"A hundred bucks.\" He says, \"All right.\" They climb down under the boardwalk and he bangs her. The next night, he runs into the same hooker, they go under the boardwalk, only this time while he's banging her, she blasts two incredible farts. When they get done, he hands her a hundred and twenty dollars. She says, \"What's the extra twenty?\" He says, \"That's for blowing the sand off my balls.\"\n\nhiya ...\nit's beautiful and I already jumped into Long Island Sound!\nall's right with the world.\n... well ...\nif you enjoy classic comedy stories ... please try this!\nme & Bill Maher, Eddie Murphy & The Jade Fountain in Paramus, New Jersey!\nThe Hal Ennis Comedy Caravan, 1979\nhuge thanks to John Fugelsang & Penn Jillette & Jim Kerr & Mark Simone &\nPhoenix's Wild Jokers for helping me get the word out about my shtuff. love you all much\nplease spread the word about The JokeLand E-Mail List ...\n... and enjoy.\nJackie\n\nstarting 8pm, Monday, July 13th!\nand all Mondays thereafter forever!\n\"The Jackie Martling Show\"\nBroadway Comedy Club\n318 West 53rd St. (8th & 9th)\nNew York New York\n(212) 757-2323\n\n8pm this Saturday, May 9th\nThe RRazz Room New Hope\nin The Ramada New Hope,\n6426 Lower York Road\nNew Hope, Pennsylvania\ntickets (888) 596-1027\nwww.therrazzroom.com\n\n9pm Saturday, May 16th\nMiami Mike's @ Fairbridge Hotel\n130 Route 10\nEast Hanover, New Jersey\n1-877-Uncle-Vin ... 1-877-862-5384\nunclevinniescomedyclub.com\n\nit's The JokeLand E-Mail List! free yuks!\nplease tell everybody you know! free jokes! free jokes! ...\nby just e-mailing me, jokelandeaol.com\n\nThe World's Best Gifts!\nthey keep on giving!\nall six of Jackie's Oglio joke CD's ...\nThe Joke Man, Sgt. Pecker, Hot Dogs & Donuts,\nCome Again?, F. Jackie & Snort ...\nare available on Amazon, iTunes,\nand at Oglio.com\n\nwww.jokeland.com\nfor information on Jackie's shows,\nyou can always just \"Use Your Finger!\"\nthirty-six years of free jokes!\nand dial (516) 922-WINE ... (516) 922-9463\nnot a pay service, just a local call ...\n\nthanks for enjoying the jokes ..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025647.txt_11564
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025647.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ESE= Steve Bannon to me Feb 24 (1 day ago) https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437  do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-) Are you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "onlyu slightly, said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:05:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out What is Benjamin upset about?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt_11576
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:56:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt_11577
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt
subject:
  Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/22/2019 12:11:49 PM", "subject": "Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein", "body": "This nut site today has you as an informant for mueller and as being friends with another informant,\nNadler. I assume they don’t realize they are undercutting their friend in the white House as well Re:\nAcosta and the Prez himself. I ordinarily would not send a whacko site but this one gets a lot of play.\n\nhttps: //teapartypac.org/muel lers-star-witness-against-trump-once-arrested-for-chi ld-porn-hung-out-wi th-\npedos-clinton-and-epstein-photos/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt_11580
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:43:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "your world does not understand how dumb he really is. he will blame everyone around him. for bad results.\n. gary cohn in good place. . as is jared. all others , not long for this world.. intresting argument whether\nusing whats app is obstruction of justice. deletes after sending. ?"}, {"sender": "LHS <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising. very hard to be law firm\nrepresenting POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly , by\nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R ustill plugged in to the show?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt_11585
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt
subject: Re: Joe cinque
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 11:45:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "never heard off him. donald is close to no one. . he talks to many people. he tells each one something differnt."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem <1=I=1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "Do you know him I heard he is so close to trump"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt_11587
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt
subject: Re: From Politico Magazine
messages:
  [{"sender": "Margaret Slattery", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "November 28, 2016 at 3:04:51 PM CST", "subject": "From Politico Magazine", "body": "Dear Joi, \nHello, I'm writing from Politico Magazine, where we're working on a special package of stories timed to Donald Trump's \ninauguration in January, and I wondered if you would be interested in contributing. \nAs he prepares to take office, our plan is to publish a handful of out-of-the box ideas for President Trump, suggested by \nwriters and thinkers from a variety of fields and ideological positions. Whether the idea has to do with politics, policy, \npersonnel or governing style, we're looking for suggestions that are specific and, above all, surprising; something inventive if \nslightly far-fetched is better than a pet cause or a well-trod policy proposal. (This exercise doesn't require that you support or \neven agree with Trump, but it does require a willingness to engage.) \nDo you have an idea along these lines that you wish the new president would consider, whether something in economics or \notherwise? If so, I'd love to hear, and we can discuss next steps from there. Ultimately, we're aiming to publish a handful of \nshort pieces (about 800 words each) as a package of proposals. \nMany thanks, and please let me know if you have questions."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "Any ideas?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "12/12/2016 7:52:15 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "talk to danny hillis he had some legisative ideas"}]


